DOCSLIB.ORG

A.3.5 Montenegro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A.3.5 Montenegro A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT WASTE MANAGEMENT SITUATION IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES FOR THE SECTOR INCLUDING OPTIONS FOR REGIONAL CO- OPERATION IN RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC WASTE TASK 1: NATIONAL WASTE ASSESSMENT AND ROADMAP FOR IMPROVING WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MONTENEGRO Dr Dominic Hogg Marijana Krivokapic Thomas Vergunst Olivera Miljanic Tim Elliott Jasminka Mikalacki Wim Van Breusegem Ivana Madžarević Costis Nicolopoulos Chara Kotsani 12th January 2017 Report for: Maja Mikosinska DG Environment of the European Commission Prepared by prepared by: Dr Dominic Hogg (Eunomia), Thomas Vergunst (Eunomia), Tim Elliott (Eunomia), Wim Van Breusegem (EMS), Costis Nicolopoulos (LDK), Chara Kotsani (LDK) and the following country experts Marijana Krivokapic, Olivera Miljanic, Jasminka Mikalacki, and Ivana Madžarević Approved by …………………………………………………. Dr Dominic Hogg (Project Director) Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd Tel: +44 (0)117 9172250 37 Queen Square Fax: +44 (0)8717 142942 Bristol Web: www.eunomia.co.uk BS1 4QS United Kingdom Disclaimer The information and views set out in this study are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Eunomia Research & Consulting has taken due care in the preparation of this report to ensure that all facts and analysis presented are as accurate as possible within the scope of the project. However, no guarantee is provided in respect of the information presented, and Eunomia Research & Consulting is not responsible for decisions or actions taken on the basis of the content of this report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1.1 Introduction A key task of the Project A Comprehensive Assessment of the Current Waste Management Situation in South East Europe and Future Perspectives for the Sector Including Options for Regional Co-Operation in Recycling of Electric and Electronic Waste, funded by DG Environment, and undertaken by a Consortium led by Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd.,1 is the development of a National Waste Assessment and Roadmap for improving waste management in Montenegro. The National Waste Assessment and Roadmap is being developed by means of a 13-stage approach. The stages are as follows: Stage 1 – Develop assessment criteria; Stage 2 – Gather baseline information and data; Stage 3 – Develop overview of waste management situation; Stage 4 – Assess country performance; Stage 5 – Identification of issues; Stage 6 – Consultation on key issues; Stage 7 – Development of the Roadmap; Stage 8 – Define sequencing of selected measures; Stage 9 – Review of financing sources; Stage 10 – Submission of draft Roadmap to the European Commission; Stage 11 – Consultation with Ministry officials; Stage 12 – Discussion at national workshop; and Stage 13 – Produce final version of country Roadmaps. Further details about the approach taken to developing the Roadmap are provided in Section 3 of the Main Report. E.1.2 The National Waste Assessment The National Waste Assessment for Montenegro indicates that although some progress is being made in introducing waste legislation and improving planning for waste management. In reality, however, progress towards meeting the objectives set out in the EU waste acquis is slow. There remain some significant omissions in respect of various key Directives where transposition is concerned, though our understanding is that legislation transposing the EU waste acquis is expected to be complete by the end of 2016 and to have come into force by 2018. Implementation of the legislation remains an issue. The Law on Waste Management seeks to establish certain principles of the Waste Framework Directive, but the hierarchy is 1 The other consortium partners are EMS, LDK, and IVL. i not accurately transposed, and nor is it given adequate meaning through implementing measures. The recently approved National Plan for Waste Management for the period 2015-2020 takes some significant strides towards the development of a coherent approach to waste management in Montenegro, but it also raises questions regarding the appropriate locus for decision making in respect of waste management. Montenegro is a small country in terms of the quantity of wastes which are generated, but there are large parts of the country which are relatively sparsely populated, and which would merit a quite different approach to logistics and choice of vehicles than other parts of the country. The diversity of situations, and the effect this would logically have on logistics, suggest local adaptation of systems is required rather than a single scheme for the country. Similarly, the collection methods chosen in different locations would be expected to influence the nature of treatment infrastructure required. The details of the National Waste Assessment are presented in Sections 4 to 15 of the Main Report – each Section explores a different theme of the waste management system (e.g. key organisations involved in waste management, performance of the regulatory system, status of planning and strategy documents, waste data and infrastructure, and approach to extended producer responsibility). Key observations include the following: 1) The Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism (MSDT) has struggled to ensure that municipalities change their approach to waste management in a manner that laws envisage. If MSDT is to develop a strategy and a Plan that delivers change on the ground, it needs to work closely with municipalities and other stakeholders, and to develop policies that are conducive to bringing about change, not least through using financial incentives to drive the change. It is disappointing that such limited progress has been made since the elaboration of the Republic-Level Waste Strategic Master Plan, which was developed with support from the European Agency for Reconstruction back in 2004. This is not for lack of commitment on the part of MSDT’s small, but committed, team, but reflects the prevailing political realities as well as the absence of appropriate incentives, and enforcement of the legislation being developed. 2) In terms of landfill infrastructure, there are two sanitary landfills in the country designed to, or close to, EU standards. A further four are in various stages of design / seeking financing support.2 According to the Report on the Implementation of the National Waste Management Plan in 2013, of the total amount of waste generated, about 30% of waste ends up in unregulated landfills, and about 30% in uncontrolled landfills. This unsatisfactory situation reflects inadequate infrastructure, especially in the North and the northern part of the Central regions, as well as a lack of proper enforcement in those areas where sanitary landfills already exist. 2 These proposed landfills will be developed in Niksic (located in Budos), Herceg Novi (located in Duboki Do), Bijelo Polje (located in Celinska Kosa), and Berane (located in Vasov Do). ii 3) Formal collection services for waste are yet to reach some households (11% or so of the total population), thereby exacerbating the problem of improper disposal. 4) The National Plan steps heavily into the appropriate domain of Local Plans for municipal waste management (for example, in - seemingly - seeking to completely specify, at a national level, systems for recycling). As noted above, the geographical diversity suggests that systems will be different across the country and this will affect treatment options and patterns. 5) Apart from the fact that there is not a complete set of waste management plans that are aligned with the national one (the latest National Plan indicated that of the 21 municipalities, 13 developed Municipal Waste Management Plans in accordance with legislation), the latest National Waste Management Plan (NWMP) suffers from a number of shortcomings, including some inconsistencies between the Plan’s recommendations and the evidence it presents. Although, for example, incineration is the option deemed least affordable, it is retained as an option whose feasibility is to be explored further. It should also be noted that in the collection system being envisaged, the high level of organic – mainly food waste – content of the residual waste would likely render it unsuitable for combustion. Further work is required to understand the options, and potential of, different collection schemes. 6) The regionalisation process – envisaged in the 2004 plan, but never actually formalised – has been slower than many would like: regional planning is now gaining momentum, but the expectation that these should identify significant projects gives rise to concerns that this will lead – as in other countries – to over-investment in residual waste treatment technologies. This is made more likely by virtue of the fact that the approach envisages only limited separate collection, a fact that may make the meeting of longer term targets (now being discussed at the European level) more problematic. 7) Capacity at the state and local level suffers from some shortcomings, with capacity gaps in terms of both resourcing, and technical competence, suggesting a need for capacity building and training. The gap between the current levels of skill and competence, and the levels required, is considerable at the local level. 8)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation Report Montenegro LG
    Evaluation of the project “Strengthening mechanisms for public finance at the local level in Montenegro” Lilit V. Melikyan 10/12/2013 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Background and objective of the project .............................................................................................................. 12 1.1.1. Country context: local governance and local government finance .............................................................. 12 1.1.2. Budget process ............................................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3. The project concept ..................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2. Purpose of the evaluation ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Ministry of Human and Minority Rights Podgorica, March
    Montenegro Ministry of Human and Minority Rights REPORT on the implementation of the Strategy for Social Inclusion of Roma and Egyptians in Montenegro 2016 - 2020 for 2019 Podgorica, March 2020 CONTENT INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY 3 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS 6 Area 1. 6 Housing 6 Area 2. 7 Education 7 Area 3. 10 Health Care 10 Area 4. 12 Employment 12 Area 5. 17 Legal status 17 Area 6. 18 Social status and family protection 18 Area 7. 22 Culture, identity and information 22 RECOMMENDATIONS 75 APPENDICES 77 2 INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY The main goal of the Strategy for Social Inclusion of Roma and Egyptians in Montenegro 2016-2020 is "Social Inclusion of Roma and Egyptians through Improving the Socio-Economic Position of Members of this Population in Montenegro". The Strategy is implemented through one-year action plans. The most significant result achieved in 2019 in the field of housing within the Regional Housing Program during 2019, is the completion of implementation of subproject MNE 4: "Construction of 94 housing units in the municipality of Berane" whose construction began in 2017, and the occupancy by beneficiaries was completed on 26 March 2019, including two families from the Roma and Egyptian population who obtained two housing units. When it comes to education, the number of Roma and Egyptian students at all levels of education has increased, and support has been provided to parents and children to raise their awareness of the importance of education. In the field of health care, according to a CEDEM survey in mid- 2018, over 95% of the Roma population is covered with health insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean | Montenegro
    THE MEDITERRANEAN | MONTENEGRO BASE ADDRESS Šuranj b.b. Kotor 85330 GPS POSITION: 42° 25.3931' / 18° 46.1982' E OPENING HOURS: 8am – 10pm BASE MAP BASE CONTACTS If you need support while on your charter, contact the base immediately using the contact details in this guide. Please contact your booking agent for all requests prior to your charter. BASE MANAGER & CUSTOMER SERVICE: Name: Goran Grbovic Phone: +382 67440999 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] BASE FACILITIES ☒ Electricity ☐ Luggage storage ☒ Water ☐ Restaurant ☐ Toilets ☒ Bar ☐ Showers ☒ Supermarket / Grocery store ☒ Laundry ☒ ATM ☐ Swimming pool ☒ Post Office ☐ Wi-Fi BASE INFORMATION LICENSE Sailing license required: ☒ Yes ☐ No PAYMENT The base can accept: ☒ Visa ☒ MasterCard ☐ Amex ☒ Cash EMBARKATION TIME Embarkation is on Saturday. YACHT BRIEFING All briefings are conducted on the chartered yacht and will take 40-60 minutes, depending on yacht size and crew experience. The team will give a detailed walk-through of your yacht’s technical equipment, information about safe and accurate navigation, including the yacht’s navigational instruments, as well as mooring, anchorage and itinerary help. The safety briefing introduces the safety equipment and your yacht’s general inventory. STOP OVERS For all DYC charters starting and/or ending in Kotor, a stopover on the last day of the charter is free of charge at the marina. DISEMBARKATION TIME Disembarkation is by Saturday 9am at the latest. All boats have to return to base on Friday and spend the last night in the marina. To assist in making checkout as smooth as possible, we ask that you arrive back at the base the evening before disembarkation.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Montenegro
    Government of Montenegro Ministry of European Integration Questionnaire Information requested by the European Commission to the Government of Montenegro for the preparation of the Opinion on the application of Montenegro for membership of the European Union I Democracy and the rule of law Minister: Gordana Djurovic Podgorica, December 2009 I Democracy and the rule of law 2 I Democracy and the rule of law TABLE OF CONTENTS POLITICAL CRITERIA....................................................................................................................5 I Democracy and the rule of law.....................................................................................................6 3 I Democracy and the rule of law 4 I Democracy and the rule of law POLITICAL CRITERIA 5 I Democracy and the rule of law I Democracy and the rule of law Constitution 1. Please provide a brief description of the constitutional and institutional situation in Montenegro. Montenegro, as the youngest member state of UN and other international, political, economic and other associations and integrations, adopted the new Constitution of Montenegro on 22 October 2007. Montenegro is an independent and sovereign state, with the republican form of government. Montenegro is a civil, democratic, ecological and the state of social justice, based on the rule of law. Bearer of sovereignty is the citizen with Montenegrin citizenship. The citizen shall exercise power directly and through the freely elected representatives. The power not stemming from the freely expressed will of the citizens in democratic election in accordance with the law, can neither be established nor recognised. The Constitution stipulates that the power shall be regulated following the principle of the division of powers into the legislative, executive and judicial. The legislative power shall be exercised by the Parliament, the executive power by the Government and the judicial by courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No
    Tourism Newsletter No. 2 NEWSLETTERtourism July 2015 1 NEWSLETTERtourism Foto: Luka Ratković July 2015 July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1 INTRODUCTION BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO Minister: Branimir Gvozdenović State Secretary for Tourism: Predrag Jelušić 2 JUNE TOPICAL ISSUES IN TOURISM Public Relations: 10 JUNE CENTRAL TOPIC Zoja Spahić Kustudić Milica Lekić 10 Interview with the Secretary General of the UN Ana Kostić Jovanović World Tourism Organization Address: IV Proleterske brigade 19 14 NEW HOTELS OPENED IN JUNE 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: PALMON BAY HOTEL & SPA, Igalo +382 (0)20 446 346 +382 (0)20 446 347 Hotel MAGNOLIJA, Tivat +382 (0)20 446 341 Fax: +382 (0)20 446 215 Apart Hotel SEA FORT, Sutomore E-mail: [email protected] Hotel PORTO SOLE, Sutomore Web site: www.mrt.gov.me Apart Hotel CRUISER, Ulcinj NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANIZATION OF MONTENEGRO 19 BATHING SITES IN MONTENEGRO Director: Blue Flag raised at 18 Bathing Sites Željka Radak Kukavičić Dolcinium Kitesurfing Club Address: Bulevar Svetog Petra Cetinjskog 130 20 ANNOUNCEMENTS OF JULY EVENTS 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: 20 Capital City of Podgorica +382 (0)77 100 001 Fax: +382 (0)77 100 009 21 Old Royal Capital of Cetinje E-mail: [email protected] 22 Central and Northern Region Web site: www.montenegro.travel 27 Coastal Region Call center: 1300 28 INTERNATIONAL MEDIA ON MONTENEGRO 30 TOURIST TURNOVER IN MONTENEGRO 30 Number of Tourists and Overnight Stays 31 Road Border Crossings 31 Sozina Tunnel 31 National Parks of Montenegro 31 Durmitor National Park 32 METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN JUNE Tourism Newsletter No.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads Reconstruction Project M-2 Tivat-Jaz Road Section Stakeholder
    Montenegro: Main Roads Reconstruction Project M -2 Tivat-Jaz Road Section Stakeholder Engagement Plan Prepared for: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development July 2020 Tranche 3 ESIA Disclosure Package / Stakeholder Engagement Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SEP Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 SEP Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 3 3 Legal and Policy Framework for Stakeholder Engagement ................................................... 5 3.1 National regulatory requirements ......................................................................................... 5 3.2 International standards and commitments ............................................................................ 8 3.2.1 EBRD PR10 ............................................................................................................................ 8 4 Stakeholder Identification and Analysis ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision on Privatization Plan for 2012
    Pursuant to the Article 3 of the Law on Privatization of Economy ( “Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro ”, no 23/96, 6/99, 59/00 and 42/04), The Government of Montenegro, at the session held on 1 March 2012, issued THE DECISION ON PRIVATIZATION PLAN FOR 2012 I. MAIN PRIVATIZATION OBJECTIVES This Decision establishes the main privatization objectives and other aspects of this process, methods and principles of privatization along with the list of companies and percentage of share capital to be privatized. The main privatization objectives are to increase competitiveness and efficiency of companies’ performance, encourage foreign investments and entrepreneurship in all fields, increase employment and improve standard of living. II. METHODS AND PRINCIPLES OF PRIVATIZATION Privatization in 2012 shall be based on privatization methods and principles adjusted to the free market requirements. 1. Sale of shares and assets by public tender 1.1. The implementation of the annou nced tender for the company NIG „Pobjeda“ AD – Podgorica shall continue. 1.2. Pursuant to the decisions passed by the Privatization and Capital Projects Council, the preparation of tenders for the following companies shall continue: 1.2.1. AD „Montecargo“ Podgorica, 1.2.2. „Montenegro airlines“ AD Podgorica, 1.2.3. AD „Kontejnerski terminal i generalni tereti “ Bar, /Container terminal and general cargo/ 1.2.4. „Jadransko brodogradilište“ AD Bijela, /Shipyard/ 1.2.5. AD "Zora" Berane, 1.2.6. HG „Budvanska rivijera“ AD Budva, 1.2.7. HTP „Ulcinjska rivijera“ AD Ulcinj, 1.2.8. „Institut crne metalurgije“ AD Nikšić, /Ferrous Metallurgy Institute/ 1.2.9. Fabrika elektroda „Piva“, Plužine /Electrode Plant/.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of the Available Knowledge and Gap Analysis
    MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM PROJECT Montenegro: Platamuni and Ratac areas Summary report of the available knowledge and gap analysis Financed by: NOTE: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA. © 2016 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P. 337 - 1080 Tunis Cedex - TUNISIA E-mail: [email protected] All property rights of texts and content of different types of this publication belong exclusively to RAC/SPA. Reproduction of these texts and contents, in whole or in part, and in any form, is prohibited without prior written permission from RAC/SPA, except for educational and other non- commercial purposes, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. For bibliographic purposes, this volume may be cited as: UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA, 2016. Montenegro: Platamuni and Ratac areas. Summary report of the available knowledge and gap analysis. By Torchia G., Pititto F., Rais C., Trainito E., Badalamenti F., Romano C., Amosso C., Bouafif C., Dragan M., Camisassi S., Tronconi D., Macicˇ ´ V., Sghaier Y.R. & Ouerghi A. Ed. RAC/SPA - MedKeyHabitats Project, Tunis: 32 p. Graphic design : Zine el Abidine MAHJOUB - www.zinetoon.com and Yassine Ramzi SGHAIER.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: Main Roads Reconstruction Project, M-2 Tivat-Jaz Road Section
    Montenegro: Main Roads Reconstruction Project, M-2 Tivat-Jaz Road Section Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework (LARF) Prepared for: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development July 2020 Tranche 3 ESIA Disclosure Package / LARF Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................. 1 List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Overview ................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Need for the Project .............................................................................................................. 7 1.4 The Project Plan & Land Use Context .................................................................................... 7 1.5 Requirement for a LARF/ LARP ............................................................................................. 8 1.6 Report Structure ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Plan Montenegro Eng Final
    Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 SPATIAL PLAN OF MONTENEGRO UNTIL 2020 Podgorica, March 2008 1 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Title of the document: Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ordering party: Ministry of Economic Development (Contract No. 01/367/2/02, 9 th December 2007) Contractor: “Montenegroinženjering”, Podgorica Technical support: GTZ German Technical Cooperation Elaboration: ‘Montenegroinženjering’, Podgorica, Ratimir Mugoša, CEO Institute for Architecture and Urbanism of Serbia, Belgrade, Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., CEO Institute for Urbanism of Slovenia, Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, Ph.D., CEO Core Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Ratimir Mugoša, Architect, Coordinator of the elaboration and main planner Ivan Stani č, udia Miodrag Vujoševi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Predrag Bulaji ć, Graduate Engineer in Electrotechnics Svetislav Popovi ć, MA in Architecture Vasilije Radulovi ć, Graduate Engineer in Geology Extended Team for Elaboration and Synthesis of the Plan: Vasilije ðurovi ć, Architect Spatial organization and development Kaliopa Dimitrovska Andrews, PhD, udia Nenad Spasi ć, Ph.D., Architect Ksenija Vukmanovi ć, Architect Dragana Čeni ć, Architect Vasilije Radulovi ć, Geology Engineer Natural Spatial Characteristics Maja Ba ćovi ć, Ph.D. in Economics Demography Vasilije Buškovi ć, MA in Biology Qualities of environment and protection of nature 2 / 220 Spatial Plan of Montenegro Until 2020 Ljubiša Kuzovi ć, Traffic Engineer Traffic- economy activity Drašenko Glavni ć, Traffic Engineer Simeun
    [Show full text]
  • " the Effect and Influence of Privatization on Touristic Values In
    "THE EFFECT AND INFLUENCE OF PRIVATIZATION ON TOURISM IN EX YUGOSLAVIAN COUNTRIES, MORE SPECIFICALLY SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO." Bachelor Thesis for Obtaining the Degree Bachelor of Business Administration Tourism and Hospitality Management Submitted to MODUL University Vienna Promoted by Eva Aileen Jungwirth-Edelmann, MA Aleksandar Djordjevic Student ID: 1211072 30.05.2015 ABSTRACT Topic: The effect and influence of privatization on tourism in Ex Yugoslavian countries, more specifically Serbia and Montenegro Name of Author: Aleksandar Djordjevic Course/Year: BBA in Tourism and Hospitality Management/2015 Pages: 55 Content: Privatization is a complex concept, which is often discussed in theory and implemented in practice. Privatization process is commonly used in countries that are transforming their market from closed to open. During the communism in Yugoslavia, private property has been abolished. When Yugoslavia ceased to exist, member states faced the property rights challenges. Privatization was one of the channels to convert collective ownership to private one. In this paper, all of the aspects of privatization are being observed. The focus is on the positive effects and successful examples of the privatization on the territory of former Yugoslavia. Side effects and negative aspects of privatization processes are also pointed out in this work. The precedent and actual situation in transitional economies is displayed for comparison, especially between Serbia and Montenegro. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the tourism industry in the former Yugoslavia and to explore how market transformation affected tourism in the post-socialistic economies. Several cases from Serbia and Montenegro has been studied in order to present current situation in these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Development Strategy of Tivat Municipality for 2020-2024 with an Action Plan for 2020 - 2024
    Tourism Development Strategy of Tivat Municipality for 2020-2024 with an action plan for 2020 - 2024 Tourism Development Strategy of Tivat Municipality for 2020-2024 with an action plan for 2020 - 2024 Table of content Baseline for making of of tourism development strategy of Tivat municipality ..... 6 Mission and vision of the Strategy ......................................................................... 8 Methodology and process of development of Tivat Municipality Tourism Development Strategy ........................................................................................... 8 Analysis of the macroeconomic environment with a focus on Montenegro ........ 10 Global ekonomic trends ............................................................................................................ 10 Macroeconomic environment - Montenegro ............................................................................ 11 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ............................................................................................. 11 Montenegro budget .............................................................................................................. 11 Zaposlenost ........................................................................................................................... 12 Unemployment ..................................................................................................................... 12 Gross and net earnings ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]