DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Federation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : RUSSIAN FEDERATION Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 28 October, 2002) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 8 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 12 THE CONFLICTS IN CHECHNYA 12 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT: CHECHNYA RECENT HISTORY (1922-1998) 12 THE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN DAGESTAN AND CHECHNYA (SEPTEMBER 1999 - MARCH 2000) 14 VIOLATIONS OF HUMANITARIAN LAW BY THE FEDERAL FORCES HAS LED DIRECTLY TO THE DISPLACEMENT OF THE CIVILIAN POPULATION (1999-2000) 16 INSECURITY AND VIOLENCE HAMPER GOVERNMENT'S PLANS OF NORMALIZATION IN CHECHNYA (2000-2002) 17 CIVILIAN POPULATION IN CHECHNYA ALSO EXPOSED TO VIOLENCE FROM THE CHECHEN REBEL GROUPS (2000-2002) 19 REVIEW OF POPULATION MOVEMENTS BETWEEN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (SEPTEMBER 1999-DECEMBER 2000) 20 VIOLENCE AND INSECURITY CONTINUE TO TRIGGER DISPLACEMENT IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2001-2002) 22 OTHER CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 23 ETHNIC RUSSIAN POPULATION LEAVE NORTH CAUCASIAN REPUBLICS IN A CONTEXT OF ETHNIC ANTAGONISMS 23 DISPLACEMENT RESULTING FROM THE INTER-COMMUNAL CONFLICT IN THE PRIGORODNY DISTRICT (1992-1998) 24 MINORITIES UNDER PRESSURE TO LEAVE THE KRASNODAR AND OTHER REGIONS IN NORTH CAUCASUS (2001-2002) 25 DEFINITIONS 25 INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT IN THE CIS REGION: A WIDE RANGE OF CATEGORIES 25 POPULATION PROFILE AND FIGURES 28 POPULATION FIGURES : DISPLACEMENT AS A RESULT OF THE SECOND CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA (SINCE AUGUST 1999) 28 DISPLACED POPULATION IN INGUSHETIA: ABOUT 110,000 PERSONS ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES (OCTOBER 2002) 28 DISPLACED POPULATION IN CHECHNYA: ABOUT 140,000 PERSONS (AS OF OCTOBER 2002) 31 MOVEMENTS BETWEEN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA SINCE 1999: NO PATTERN OF LARGE-SCALE RETURN (2002) 33 NO PRECISE FIGURE FOR THE DISPLACED WHO LEFT CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA TO OTHER PARTS OF RUSSIA (2000-2001) 35 INGUSHETIA HOSTS BETWEEN 120,000 AND 170,000 DISPLACED PERSONS FROM CHECHNYA (NOVEMBER 2000-MARCH 2001) 35 ESTIMATES FOR THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED POPULATION IN CHECHNYA RANGE FROM 138,000 TO 235,000 PERSONS (FEBRUARY 2001) 37 POPULATION FIGURES : OTHER SITUATIONS OF DISPLACEMENT 39 DISPLACEMENT AS A RESULT OF THE FIRST CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA (1994-1996): ABOUT 65,000 PERSONS STILL REGISTERED AS "FORCED MIGRANTS" (JUNE 2002) 39 INGUSHETIA HOSTS AT LEAST 12,000 DISPLACED FROM THE PRIGORODNY DISTRICT (NORTH OSSETIA) (JUNE 2002) 39 CASELOAD FROM THE FIRST CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA (AS OF 2000 AND 2001) 40 STATISTICAL SOURCES 41 POPULATIONS FIGURES OF THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL MIGRATION SERVICES FLAWED BY INCONSISTENT PRACTICES 41 UN OCHA NOTE ON IDP REGISTRATION IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2001) 42 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT 44 GENERAL 44 CONSTANT MOVEMENTS OF IDPS BETWEEN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2000) 44 HIGH-RISK ROAD TO SAFETY: SELECTED REPORTS (NOVEMBER 1999) 44 PHYSICAL SECURITY & FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 46 PHYSICAL SAFETY AND PERSONAL LIBERTY 46 REPORTS OF IDPS BEING RESETTLED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (JUNE-SEPTEMBER 2002) 46 INGUSH PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS RAISES CONCERN AMONG CHECHEN DISPLACED POPULATION (APRIL-MAY 2002) 47 TENSIONS BETWEEN THE DISPLACED POPULATION AND LOCAL RESIDENTS AND OFFICIALS (2000- 2002) 47 DISPLACED IN INGUSHETIA UNDER PRESSURE TO RETURN TO CHECHNYA (1999-2001) 48 CIVILIAN POPULATION IN CHECHNYA CONTINUOUSLY EXPOSED TO MAJOR THREATS TO THEIR PHYSICAL AND PERSONAL SECURITY (2001-2002) 51 REPORTS OF SECURITY INCIDENTS IN IDP CAMPS AND SETTLEMENTS IN INGUSHETIA AND CHECHNYA (2000-2002) 54 A SPECIAL GROUP OF CONCERN: THE CHILDREN (2002) 55 DISPLACED EXPOSED TO INSECURITY: THE CASE OF THE SWEEP OPERATION IN SERNOVODSK (WESTERN CHECHNYA) (JULY 2001) 56 WOMEN IN CHECHNYA EXPOSED TO RAPE AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE (2001) 58 WIDESPREAD USE OF LANDMINES IN CHECHNYA (2001) 59 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 60 THE PROPISKA SYSTEM REMAINS DE FACTO IN PLACE (2002) 60 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2001-2002) 63 SUBSISTENCE NEEDS (HEALTH NUTRITION AND SHELTER) 65 2 FOOD 65 IDPS IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA RELY ON FOOD ASSISTANCE FOR THEIR SURVIVAL (2001) 65 CHECHNYA: DANISH REFUGEE COUNCIL CONFIRMS NEED FOR FOOD ASSISTANCE (OCTOBER 2001) 65 IDPS IN INGUSHETIA FACE INSECURITY OVER FOOD RATIONS PROVIDED BY FEDERAL AUTHORITIES (2000-2001) 67 SHELTER 68 INTERNALLY DISPLACED IN INGUSHETIA FACE HIGH RISK OF EVICTION FROM THEIR TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION (2001-2002) 68 URGENT NEEDS OF SHELTER ASSISTANCE TO IDPS IN INGUSHETIA (2002) 69 VAST SHELTER NEEDS IN GROZNY AND OTHER TOWNS IN CHECHNYA (2000) 72 DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE DISPLACED CHECHEN DISPLACED REPORTEDLY IMPEDES THEIR ACCESS TO ACCOMMODATION IN MOSCOW (1999-2001) 72 HEALTH 72 TB HAS REACHED EPIDEMIC PROPORTIONS AMONG THE IDP POPULATION IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2002) 73 WHO REPORTS GROWING NUMBER OF HIV CASES IN INGUSHETIA (2001) 74 GENERAL HEALTH SITUATION IN INGUSHETIA AND CHECHNYA UNDER SURVEILLANCE (2001- 2002) 74 NUMBER OF CASES OF HEPATITIS A AMONG DISPLACED CHILDREN CONTINUE TO GROW IN INGUSHETIA (2001) 76 UNICEF ISSUES REPORTS ON CHILDREN HEALTH IN INGUSHETIA (2001) 77 7,000 PERSONS IN NEED OF PROSTHETIC OR ORTHOPAEDIC HELP IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2000) 79 PSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS OF THE DISPLACED CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES (2000-2002) 80 WATER AND SANITATION 81 SANITATION AND WATER IN TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION CENTRES NOT SATISFACTORY (2002) 81 INGUSHETIA: INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE STILL NEEDED TO MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (2001) 83 CHECHNYA: LACK OF CLEAN WATER AND POOR SANITATION THREATEN PUBLIC HEALTH (2001) 84 ACCESS TO EDUCATION 85 INGUSHETIA 85 INGUSHETIA: LACK OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE DISPLACED POPULATION (2001) 85 CHECHNYA 86 CHECHNYA: 200,000 CHILDREN ARE ENROLLED BUT NEEDS ARE STILL HUGE (2001) 86 OTHER AREAS 86 LOCAL AUTHORITIES DENY ACCESS TO DISPLACED CHILDREN IN RUSSIAN CITIES (2001) 86 ISSUES OF SELF-RELIANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 88 SELF-RELIANCE 88 ACTION CONTRE LA FAIM REPORTS A DEGRADATION OF THE ECONOMIC SITUATION OF THE DISPLACE HOUSEHOLDS IN INGUSHETIA (2002) 88 INFLUX OF IDPS FROM CHECHNYA AGGRAVATES THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION IN NORTH CAUCASUS (MARCH 2000) 89 ICRC IDENTIFIES COPING MECHANISMS OF IDPS IN INGUSHETIA (OCTOBER 2001) 90 3 DISPLACED FACE DISCRIMINATORY ACCESS TO THE LABOUR MARKET IN RUSSIAN CITIES: THE EXAMPLE OF MOSCOW (2001) 91 DEPENDENCY ON EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE REMAIN WIDESPREAD IN CHECHNYA (2001-2002) 92 ESSENTIAL CONTRIBUTION OF HOST FAMILIES (2000) 93 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES NEED EXTERNAL SUPPORT TO ENHANCE SELF-RELIANCE CAPACITY OF THE DISPLACED POPULATION IN INGUSHETIA AND CHECHNYA (2000) 94 COPING STRATEGIES OF THE DISPLACED IN INGUSHETIA: HEAVY DEPENDENCE ON AID (JULY 2000) 95 PARTICIPATION 96 IDPS IN INGUSHETIA VOICE THEIR CONCERNS (2001) 96 PARTICIPATION OF THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED POPULATION TO THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS (26 MARCH 2000) 97 DISPLACED IN INGUSHETIA WERE ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE CHECHNYA REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE DUMA (AUGUST 2000) 98 DOCUMENTATION NEEDS AND CITIZENSHIP 99 DOCUMENTATION NEEDS 99 DISPLACED FROM CHECHNYA FACE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO THE STATUS OF FORCED MIGRANTS (1999-2002) 99 REPORTS OF PROBLEMS OF ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS (1999-2002) 100 SUSPENSION OF REGISTRATION OF NEW IDPS FROM CHECHNYA INTO INGUSHETIA (2001-2002) 101 ISSUES OF FAMILY UNITY, IDENTITY AND CULTURE 104 FAMILY UNITY 104 DISPLACED IN INGUSHETIA GATHERED INTO "FAMILIES" AVERAGING 9 MEMBERS (1999-2000) 104 REPORTS OF CHECHEN MEN SEPARATED FROM THEIR FAMILIES AT THE CHECHEN-INGUSH BORDER AND CHECKPOINTS (JANUARY 2000) 104 PROPERTY ISSUES 106 GENERAL 106 COURTS REJECT CLAIMS FOR COMPENSATION FOR LOST PROPERTIES IN CHECHNYA (2002) 106 SAVINGS BANK SUSPENDED THE PAYMENTS TO DEPOSITS IN CHECHNYA (1995-2002) 106 COMPENSATION FOR LOST PROPERTY: NO SCHEME FOR THE VICTIMS OF THE CURRENT CONFLICT IN CHECHNYA (2002) 107 25 % OF THE DISPLACED POPULATION INTERVIEWED BY MSF DESCRIBED THEIR HOMES IN CHECHNYA AS INTACT OR LIGHTLY DESTROYED 109 REPORTS OF WIDESPREAD LOOTING BY RUSSIAN FORCES INSIDE CHECHNYA (1999-2001) 109 PATTERNS OF RETURN AND RESETTLEMENT 111 RETURN TO CHECHNYA 111 ACTION PLAN ADOPTED BY INGUSH AND CHECHEN AUTHORITIES FORESEES RETURN OF IDPS BY OCTOBER 2002 (MAY 2002) 111 4 RETURN ASSISTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES SUPPORTS VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTS (2002) 112 INSECURITY IN CHECHNYA REMAINS THE MAIN CONCERN OF THE DISPLACED (2002) 113 CHECHEN GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTS RESETTLEMENT POLICY WITHIN CHECHNYA (2001-2002) 114 RETURN POLICY: PRACTICES INDUCING IDPS TO RETURN TO CHECHNYA (2000-2001) 115 GOVERNMENT RETURN POLICY: THE EXAMPLE OF IDPS IN INGUSHETIA (1999-2001) 116 NO LARGE-SCALE RETURN MOVEMENTS FROM INGUSHETIA (1999-2001) 118 LARGE MAJORITY OF IDPS IN INGUSHETIA HAS NO IMMEDIATE PLANS TO RETURN HOME (JULY 2001) 119 UNHCR AVOIDS STIMULATING FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY IN CHECHNYA (FEBRUARY 2001) 120 RETURN TO THE PRIGORODNY DISTRICT (NORTH-OSSETIA) 120 COOPERATION AGREEMENT SIGNED BETWEEN NORTH OSSETIA AND INGUSHETIA (OCTOBER 2002) 120 MOST DISPLACED WILL RETURN BUT A SMALL PORTION IS LIKELY TO STAY DURABLY IN INGUSHETIA (2001-2002) 121 RESETTLEMENT 122 ABOUT 35,000 ETHNIC INGUSH DISPLACED
Recommended publications
  • Endangered Caucasian Languages in Georgia (Ecling)

    Endangered Caucasian Languages in Georgia (Ecling)

    100 100 95 95 75 75 25 25 5 5 0 0 DOBES Tsova-Tush, Svan, Udi Endangered Caucasian Languages in Georgia (ECLinG) The Caucasus region has been renowned since antiquity as an area with an extra- Kalmyk K Blagodarnyj ub ordinarily high number of distinct languages. an The linguistic diversity of yore has not only Majkop Stavropol' Russian Avar Kuma Lak Georgian Adyghe Neftekumsk Juúno-Suxokumsk survived until the present but has even been Prikumsk Dargwa Kuban Abaza Avar considerably extended by the migration of Kabardian Avar KoÄubej ¨erkessk Dargw a Georgian Beslenei Noghay L speakers of Indo-European, Turkic, Mongol- Tuapse Abaza a Caspian D Kabardian Georgian a k Chech rg Mineral'nyje Vody en w ian, Semitic, and other languages into the a Mozdok- Kizljar (Bz Ka Kabardian area. Today, the linguistic map of the SoÄi yb') ra Ka ek Sea Ab ch Kabardian bard Mozdok er Gagra kh ay ia T Caucasus area comprises appr. 40 indigenous a n Av z Nal'Äik C ar I h M Ba n Kostek languages, pertaining to three groups which ingr Suxumi lk Tatisch ec ( (Upper) g el A ar h ia u k n b (Digor) e a z n Groznyj Dargwa L h Digora s have not been proved to be genetically Sva h Xasavjurt u MaxaÄkala i n O Vladikavkaz Go Lak Kiziljurt ) n (Lower) do a s Ch be Andi OÄamÄire i (Iron) am ri Kumyk related with each other, but also Indo- l s Bujnaksk e e alal Botlikh r t Manaskent g i Di Tati ) do Karata n Zugdidi a ( European languages such as Armenian, i M ur (Racha) n o vs Akhvakh Black M k he Sergokala h (K (Tual) e ( Bagulal D Enguri v T Tindi GegeÅÖori ) r Russian, Ossetic, or Tati, Turkic languages Cxinvali u a Kutaisi s Khvarshi (Marïvili) (Kist) h a r ) Khunzal v g v) w Azeri Turkic such as Azeri, Karachay-Balkar, Kumyk, or (Imeretian) ha Kapucha A Sea Poti (Ps i L a Rioni Hinukh h a Telavi c Gori r k an i (Guri) (Mtiulian) A r at Derbent Bats KubaÄi a T Trukhmen, the East-Aramaic Semitic Batumi Axalcixe as (Adzhar) (Ka Udi ab Armenian rtl (K Balak„n T Georgian ian ak Agh language Aysor, and Mongolian Kalmyk.
  • Health Sector Field Directory

    Health Sector Field Directory

    HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St.
  • ON the EFFECTIVE USE of PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Andrew Peek All Rights Reserved

    ON the EFFECTIVE USE of PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 © 2021 Andrew Peek All Rights Reserved

    ON THE EFFECTIVE USE OF PROXY WARFARE by Andrew Lewis Peek A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May 2021 2021 Andrew Peek All rights reserved Abstract This dissertation asks a simple question: how are states most effectively conducting proxy warfare in the modern international system? It answers this question by conducting a comparative study of the sponsorship of proxy forces. It uses process tracing to examine five cases of proxy warfare and predicts that the differentiation in support for each proxy impacts their utility. In particular, it proposes that increasing the principal-agent distance between sponsors and proxies might correlate with strategic effectiveness. That is, the less directly a proxy is supported and controlled by a sponsor, the more effective the proxy becomes. Strategic effectiveness here is conceptualized as consisting of two key parts: a proxy’s operational capability and a sponsor’s plausible deniability. These should be in inverse relation to each other: the greater and more overt a sponsor’s support is to a proxy, the more capable – better armed, better trained – its proxies should be on the battlefield. However, this close support to such proxies should also make the sponsor’s influence less deniable, and thus incur strategic costs against both it and the proxy. These costs primarily consist of external balancing by rival states, the same way such states would balance against conventional aggression. Conversely, the more deniable such support is – the more indirect and less overt – the less balancing occurs.
  • Guide to Investment the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania Pwc Russia ( Provides Industry–Focused Assurance, Tax, Legal and Advisory Services

    Guide to Investment the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania Pwc Russia ( Provides Industry–Focused Assurance, Tax, Legal and Advisory Services

    Guide to investment The Republic of North Ossetia–Alania PwC Russia (www.pwc.ru) provides industry–focused assurance, tax, legal and advisory services. Over 2,300 people work in our offices in Moscow, St Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Yuzhno–Sakhalinsk and Vla- dikavkaz. We share our thinking, extensive experience and creative solutions to deliver practical advice and open up new avenues for business. Our global network includes more than 169,000 people in 158 countries. PwC first began working in Russia in 1913, and re-established its presence in 1989. Since then, PwC has been a leader of the professional services market in Russia. According to Expert magazine’s annual ratings prepared by the Expert RA independent ratings agency, PwC is a leading provider of assurance and advisory services in Russia (see Expert magazine for 2000–2011). This guide has been prepared in collaboration with the Permanent Representation of the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania to the President of the Russian Federation. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this brochure with- out obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication. The PwC network, its member firms, employees and agents accept no liability and disclaim all responsi- bility for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining from acting, relying on the information contained in this publication, or for any decision based upon it.
  • 1222 RUS Khashiyev H/Exec Disappearance Cases

    1222 RUS Khashiyev H/Exec Disappearance Cases

    DIRECTORATE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW DIRECTORATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT FOR THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS H/Exec(2015)5 rev – 20 August 2015 ——————————————— Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russian Federation (No. 57942/00) group of cases Overview of the Court’s judgments concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus Memorandum prepared by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights ——————————————— The opinions expressed in this document are binding on neither the Committee of Ministers nor the European Court. This document contains an overview of the judgments delivered by the European Court against the Russian Federation concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus between 1999 and 2006 (Khashiyev and Akayeva group of cases). It also indicates the fate of the disappeared persons, where known, at the time of the examination by the European Court. 1 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/ 2 Case name Disappeared Facts as established by the Criminal investigation file, as Fate of disappeared persons Violations Application no. persons (name Court noted in the Court’s judgment as indicated in the Court’s found Date of definitive and year of birth) judgments (where known) judgment Bazorkina Mr Khadzhi-Murat The applicant’s son was Case no. 19112 opened on 14 July Unknown. Art. 2 69481/01 Yandiyev (1975) detained on 2 February 2000 2001 by the Chechnya Prosecutor’s (substantive 11/12/2006 by State servicemen during a Office under Article 126 § 2 of the and counter-terrorist operation in Criminal Code (aggravated procedural), the village of Alkhan-Kala kidnapping).
  • Economic and Social Council

    Economic and Social Council

    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2004/62/Add.1 26 March 2004 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH ONLY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixtieth session Agenda item 11 (c) CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING QUESTIONS OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION The right to freedom of opinion and expression Addendum ∗ Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received ∗ ∗ The present document is being circulated in the language of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions GE.04-12400 E/CN.4/2004/62/Add.1 Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction 1 – 2 5 SUMMARY OF CASES TRANSMITTED AND REPLIES RECEIVED 3 – 387 5 Afghanistan 3 – 5 5 Albania 6 – 7 6 Algeria 8 – 25 6 Argentina 26 – 34 11 Armenia 35 – 38 13 Azerbaijan 39 – 66 15 Bangladesh 67 – 87 30 Belarus 88 – 94 36 Benin 95 – 96 39 Bolivia 97 – 102 39 Botswana 103 – 106 42 Brazil 107 -108 43 Burkina Faso 109 -111 43 Cambodia 112 – 115 44 Cameroon 116 – 127 45 Central African Republic 128 – 132 49 Chad 133 – 135 50 Chile 136 – 138 51 China 139 – 197 52 Colombia 198 – 212 71 Comoros 213 – 214 75 Côte d’Ivoire 215 – 219 75 Cuba 220 – 237 77 Democratic Republic of the Congo 238 – 257 82 Djibouti 258 – 260 90 Dominican Republic 261 – 262 91 Ecuador 263 – 266 91 Egypt 267 – 296 92 El Salvador 297 – 298 100 Eritrea 299 – 315 100 Ethiopia 316 – 321 104 Gabon 322 – 325 106 Gambia 326 – 328 108 Georgia 329 – 332 109 Greece 333 – 334 111 Guatemala 335 – 347 111 Guinea-Bissau 348 – 351 116 E/CN.4/2004/62/Add.1
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention

    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention

    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
  • Annex E.4.15

    Annex E.4.15

    ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.15-Corr 06-11-2015 1/35 EC PT Annex E.4.15 Public Corrected Version of ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.15 ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.15-Corr 06-11-2015 2/35 EC PT SOUTH OSSETIA: THE BURDEN OF RECOGNITION Europe Report N°205 - 7 June 2010 lnternationa Crisis Group WORKING TO PREVENT CONFLICT WORLDWIDE GEO-OTP-0001-1242 ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.15-Corr 06-11-2015 3/35 EC PT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS i I. IN.TRODUCTION 1 II. POST-RECOGNITION DEVELOPMENTS 2 A. THEPOPfilJ\TION 2 B. TIIE Soc10-EcoNOMIC SITUATION AND RECONSTRUCTION 4 l. Local conditions .4 2. Russian aid and corruption 6 C. RUSSI/\ '8 MILITARY PRR8F.NCE-SOOTH 0SSETIJ\ '8 STRJ\ TRGTC V /\LUE 7 Ill. LOCAL POLITICS 9 A. CoMPr:rnroN FOR RlJ8SIJ\N RRSOlJRCKS 9 B. Tl IE RULE OF LAW ANI) HUMAN RIOI ITS 12 C. FUTURE PROSPECTS 13 IV. GEORGTAN-OSSETTAN RELATIONS 15 A. FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 15 B. Dt-:TENTTONS 16 C. DISPLACEMENT ISSUES 17 V. THE INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE 19 A. THE GENEV J\ T /\LKS 19 B. FIELD PRESENCE 20 C. TIIE EU MONITORINGMI SSION 21 VI. CONCLUSION 23 APPENDICES A. MAP OF G.EOROlA 24 B. MAP OF Soun 1 OssHTIA 25 C. MAP OF sotrra 0SSETIA SHOWING VILLAGES UNDER GEORGIANAND 0SSETIAN CONTROL PRIOR TO 7 AUGUST 2008 26 D. AnOUTTIIEINTERNATIONALCRl SIS GROUP 27 E. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRll:FINGS ON ElJROPli SINCE 2007 28 F. CRJSlS GROUP BOAR!) OFTRUSTEES 29 GEO-OTP-0001-1243 ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.15-Corr 06-11-2015 4/35 EC PT lnternationa Crisis Group WORKING TO PREVENT CONFLICT WORLDWIDE Program Report N°205 7 June 2010 SOUTH OSSETIA: THE BURDEN OF RECOGNITION EXECUTIVE SUlVIMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS South Ossetia is no closer to genuine independence now threats on its own North Caucasus territory, Moscow than in August 2008, when Russia went to war with has preferred to work with Kokoity and his entourage, Georgia and extended recognition.
  • Location, Event&Q

    Location, Event&Q

    # from what/ where which how why who for MOBILE versi on click here when who who where when index source "location, event" "phys, pol, med, doc" detail physical detail political name "9/11 Truth Interactive Spreadsheet Click on dow n arrow to sort / filter, click again to undo." Top 100 / compilations entity entity detail country / state date Item .. right-click on li nk to open in new tab 1 "Francis, Stephen NFU" WTC physical Controlled demolition Explosive experts "Overwhelming evidence indicates that a combination of n uclear, thermitic and conventional explosives were used in a controlled demoliti on of the WTC on 9/11. Nanothermite contributed but does not have sufficient det onation velocity to pulverize the WTC into dust. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is leading gatekeeper trying to deflect Israel's role. See Cozen O'Connor 9/11 lawsuit." pic "9/11 Truth, anti-Zionists" Engineers / Scie ntists "U.S., Israel, SA, Britain" 2 "Francis, Stephen NFU" "WTC, Pentagon, PA" political False flag Cabal "The cabal: U.S., Britain, Saudi Arabia and Israel execu ted the 9/11 false flag attack in order to usher in a new 'war on terror' along with the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and fullfil the PNAC's 'Full Spectrum Dominan ce' of the Middle East and its resources ... all have roots that go back to Zion ist / Nazi Germany, the Cold War ... 9/11 was a planned step." lnk Intel ag encies "Cabal: US, UK, Israel & SA" Mossad / Sayeret Matkal "U.S., Israel, S A, Britain" 3 "Fox, Donald" WTC 1-2 physical "Mini Neutron, Fissionless Fusio n" Controlled demolition "VeteransToday: Fox, Kuehn, Prager, Vike n,Ward, Cimono & Fetzer on mini neutron bombs discuss all major WTC theories micr o nuke (neutron) most promising comparatively low blast effects, a quick blast o f radiation that doesn't linger, a series of shape charged mini-neutron bombs we re detonated from top to bottom to simulate a free fall collapse.
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention

    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention

    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2006 to 2012 October 2012, Moscow Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. Introduction This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Interregional Committee against Torture, Human Rights Institute, Russian Justice Initiative (Utrecht), Legal Assistance Astreya (Moscow), Moscow office of the Penal Reform International, International Human Rights Youth Action, Krasnoyarsk Public Committee for Human Rights Protection, Center of Civic Education and Human Rights in Perm region. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Fifth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts’ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report. When working on the Report we did not strive to refute the official information and to confront the Russian Federation’s official position.
  • Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) Is a Quarterly Peer-Reviewed, Non- Profit and Only-Online Academic Journal Based in Germany

    Caucasian Review of International Affairs (CRIA) Is a Quarterly Peer-Reviewed, Non- Profit and Only-Online Academic Journal Based in Germany

    CCCAUCASIAN REVIEW OF IIINTERNATIONAL AAAFFAIRS Vol. 4 (((3(333)))) sssummersummer 2020201020 101010 EU DEMOCRACY PROMOTION THROUGH CONDITIONALITY IN ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD JANINE REINHARD EU ENGAGEMENT IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN GEORGIA : TOWARDS A MORE PROACTIVE ROLE MEHMET BARDAKÇI RELIGION AND ITS IMPORTANCE IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS : A CASE STUDY OF 2008 RUSSIAN -GEORGIAN WAR INES -JACQUELINE WERKNER FROM RACKETEER TO EMIR : A POLITICAL PORTRAIT OF DOKU UMAROV , RUSSIA ’S MOST WANTED MAN KEVIN DANIEL LEAHY THE CRISIS OF GAZPROM AS THE CRISIS OF RUSSIA ’S “E NERGY SUPER -STATE ” POLICY TOWARDS EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION ANDREY KAZANTSEV EURASIAN BARGAINING , AGRICULTURE , AND THE DOHA ROUND SARITA D. JACKSON WAS KOSOVO ’S SPLIT -OFF LEGITIMATE ? BACKGROUND , MEANING AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE ICJ’ S ADVISORY OPINION HEIKO KRUEGER UKRAINE : A CHALLENGE FOR U.S., EU & NATO REGIONAL POLICY TAMERLAN VAHABOV ISSN: 1865-6773 www.cria -online.org EDITORIAL BOARD: Dr. Tracey German (King’s College Dr. Robin van der Hout (Europa-Institute, London, United Kingdom) University of Saarland, Germany) Dr. Andrew Liaropoulos (Institute for Dr. Jason Strakes (Analyst, Research European and American Studies, Greece) Reachback Center East, U.S.) Dr. Martin Malek (National Defence Dr. Cory Welt (George Washington Academy, Austria) University, U.S.) INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Prof. Hüseyin Bagci , Middle East Prof. Werner Münch , former Prime Technical University, Ankara, Turkey Minister of Saxony-Anhalt, former Member of the European Parliament, Germany Prof. Hans-Georg Heinrich, University of Vienna, Austria Prof. Elkhan Nuriyev , Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies under the Prof. Edmund Herzig , Oxford University, President of the Republic of Azerbaijan UK Dr.
  • S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\Committee Print 2018\Henry\Jan. 9 Report

    Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! S. PRT. 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT 115–21 PUTIN’S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY A MINORITY STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 10, 2018 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations Available via World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–110 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN. 9 REPORT FOREI-42327 with DISTILLER seneagle Embargoed for Media Publication / Coverage until 6:00AM EST Wednesday, January 10. COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, Tennessee, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland MARCO RUBIO, Florida ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JEFF FLAKE, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware CORY GARDNER, Colorado TOM UDALL, New Mexico TODD YOUNG, Indiana CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon RAND PAUL, Kentucky CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey TODD WOMACK, Staff Director JESSICA LEWIS, Democratic Staff Director JOHN DUTTON, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:06 Jan 09, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\COMMITTEE PRINT 2018\HENRY\JAN.