Commission of the Peace-1861

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Commission of the Peace-1861 (No. 21.) 18 6 2. TASMAN.I A. COMMISSION OF THE PEACE-1861. RETURN TO AN ORDER OF THE HOUSE. (Mr. C. Meredith.) Laid upon the Table by the Attorney-General, and ordered by the House to be · printed, 25 July, 1862. RETURN of the Names of all Persons who were in the CoMMISSION of the PEACE .at the time the last Commission was issued. James Cox. John Atkinson. Robert Quayle Kermode. Benjamin Horne. Richard Barker. James Maclanachan. Joseph Hone. Edward Samuel Pickard Bedford. James Mackersey. John Ogle Gage. Alexander Clerke. Richard Lewis. James Cubbiston Sutherland. Arthur Thomas Collett. William Robertson. Robert Harrison. Richard Dry. John Cameron. William Henry Glover. Charles Brown Hardwicke. William Carter. John Burnett. Hezekiah Harrison. James Robertson. Malcolm Laing Smith. Charles Shum Henty. Philip Thomas Smith. William Sorell. Anthony Fenn Kemp, Thomas Cruttenden Roderick O'Connor. Askin Morrison. Stephen Henry Grueber. ,John Beamont. James George Parker. William Stanley Sharland. Edward Abbott. Joseph Penny. Abraham Walker. Henry Nicholls. Horace Rowcroft. Henry Hopkins. Robert Officer. Frederick Coape Smith. Thomas Manley. Francis Aubin. Francis Gerard 'l'abart. Simeon Lord. D' Arey Wentworth. Archibald Thompson. James Grant the younger. Thomas Mason. Edward Tobin. David Ogilvy. George Hull. Thomas Walker. William Francis Wright. Jocelyn Bartholomew Thomas. John Helder Wedge. Henry Graham. Theodore Bryant Bartley. Robert W ettenhall. John Redman Bateman. George Anthony Kemp. William Wood. Thomas Coke Brownell. George Stephen Davies. James Ryley Kenworthy. Francis Evans. Joseph Milligan. William Gardner Sams. Samuel Henrv Thomas. John Leake. John Pevton Jones. Robert Wyndham Fenwick. Robert Hepburn. George Brooks Forster. Frederick Evans Tensh. William Proctor. Alfred Garrett. Henry Lloyd. John Whitefoord. Edward Carr Shaw. Walter Davidson. Charles Schaw. Frederick Synnot. Joseph Bonney. Ronald Campbell Gunn. John Walker. Charles Headlam. James Radcliffe. William Taylor Noyes. John Swan. George King. Robert Davidson. Alexander Orr. James Crear. William Crooke. William Race Allison. Cornelius Gavin Casey. John Coverdale. James Barnard. William Gunn. J olm Forster. John Stephen Hampton. William Langdon. Francis Hartwell Henslowe. George Francis Huston. William Neilley. Frederick Lewis Von Stieglitz. Francis Groom. Harvey Welman. James Alexander Gibson. ·John Lyne. William Archer. William Fletcher. HPnry James Vicary. Francis Young W"ilmore. James Richardson. John Doughty. William Pritchard Weston. William Tarleton. John Dickson Loch. ,T ohn Frederick Sharland. Peter Gordon Fraser. William Harrison. Algernon Burdett Jones. William Edward Nairn. Henrie Nichola~. William Thomas Napier Champ. Francis Burgess. Thomas Tucker Parker. John Dunn. Frederick Edmund Chalmers. Richard Pitt. Charles Arthur. Charles Meredith. William George Gardner Sams. Joseph Gellibrand Jc·nnings. Edwin Whiting. Ed ward Martfo. Henry D' Arch. Frederick Arundel Downing. Donald Cameron the younger. Hobert Pringle Stuart. Robert Power. Thomas Lloyd Gellibrand. Frederick George Brock. Thomas Daniel Chapman. Robert Blyth. John Foster. John Dunn the younger. John Cartwright Burnett. Henry Miller. Hugh Calvely Cotton. Thomas Christie Smart. John Abbott. Edward B1sdee. Oliver Goldsmith Armstrong. Edward Archer. Francis Walter Von Stieglitz. William George Gibson. 4 Edwm·d Last. Henry Butler. Alexander Reid the younger James Lord. William Stammers Button. John Watson. John Lord. Colin Nicol Campbell. George Stevenson. William Gore Elliston. Henry James Chamberlain. Robert Walker. Keith Jackson King. William Cleveland. Rodham H ulke Douglas. John Thompson. James Crear the younger. James Macnam_ara. William Mill. John Crookes. William Barnes. Frederick Browne Russell. George Drew. George William Keach. William De Gillem. William Gunn the younger. David Taylor. Christopher Henry Wright. John Meredith. Henry Allison. John Lewis Benjamin Tabart. William Russell Paton. Joseph Cohen. Henrv James Emmett. Robert Cartwright Read. Ebenezer Geiss. · .James W ootlhouse Kirwan. William Villeneuve Smith. William Crosby. J olm Compton Greg8on. John Stokell. George Gilmore. John Kellaway. James Turnbull. ·Crawford Mayne Maxwell. George Thomas Harrison. Arthur George Walker. Henry Boase Tonkin. Henry Frampton Anstey. Charles James Weedon. Alfred Kennerley. Robert Charles Chester Eardley- Charles Stanhope Thomas. John Effingham Lawrence. Wilmot. William John Clarke. John Rudd. A dam Jackson J arries Mercer. John Smith. Arthur Leake. William Seccombe. James Aikenhead. Robert Clerk. Joseph Ward. James M'Arthur. ,Tames John Bayles. William Edmund Strong. Esh Lovell. Marcus Synnot Bames Aitkin. Henry Dowling the younger. William Henry Clayton. James Winter. William Lushington Goodwin. George Marshall the younger. Henry Douglas. J olm Fletcher Walker. Fitzclarence Roberts. John Kinder Archer. William Archer. Robert De Little. Samuel Robinson Dawson. William Windsor. Isaac Bisdee. Charles Octavius Eardley-Wil- John Fawns. John Bisdee. mot. Duncan M'Pherson. Edward Nicholas. George Shekleton. Henry John Daldy. Gordon Walter Harries Burgess. Arthur O'Connor. James Fenton: Samuel Horton. Philip Hoskins Gell. 'George Robson. Matthew Ingle Browne. James Boyd. Frederick Maitland Innes. John James Butler. James Reid. William Gibson. Edwin Meredith. James Alfred Dunn. William Lyne. John Amos. Henry Clayton. Dennis Rock. David Lewis. Thomas Giblin. ,l ames Murdoch. James Eckford. Nigel J olm Davis Gresley. William Storev. Charles Friend. Charles Thomson. James Grant.· William Birch. Samuel Westbrook. Hugh Munro Hull. James Peters. Bassett Dickson the younger. James Ritchie. William Johnstone. Bartholomew William Thomas. Richard Strachan. James Denton Toosey the Edward Johnstone Manlev. Richard Allison. younger. James Edward Donlevy. • Ja mes Edwards. Robert M'Kenzie Ayre. John Norman M'Leod. Edward Boyd Stevenson. George Thomas Gleadow. ,l ohn Ralston. Robert Williamson. William Alcock Tully. Edward Atkyns Walpole. Joshua Ferguson. Frederick Thomas Walker. Henry Thomas Ayton Murray. George Rouse. James Cogle. Henry Manning. Charles Clarke. Robert Keate Sams. John Summerfield Hawkins. Michael Fenton the elder. William Keeler Hawkes. Francis Smith. Michael Fenton the younger. Christopher Leach. Alexander Rose. Claudius Thomson. Henry Hopkins the younger. Allan M'Kiunon. J olrn Leslie Stewart. George Nicholas. Douglas Thomas Kilburn~ Rohert Patten Adams. William Blackburne Wood. John Nicolson. James Whyte. Rodham Catherine Davison Thomas Ransom. William Knight. Home. Malcolm M'Gregor. George Gibson. Henry Lewis Stieglitz. Augustus 1''rederick Ja mes John Donellan Balfe. Augustus Nash Spong. Bowen. William Campbell. Ralph Terry. J olm Mitchell. Alexander Finlay. John James Aston Watkins. Francis Allison the younger. The Honorable William Henty. John Swan. Nathaniel Paul Allison. Joseph Kirkby. Henry Cook. George Maddox. David Ritchie. Isaac Sherwin. Samuel Moses. Emest Ross Lewin Scott. James Hepburn. Alexander M'Naughtan. Macdonald Kinnear Swanston. Michael Steel. Frederick vVilbraham Ford. Charles Nimroud John Willes. Charles Allan Barker. Thomas Kentish Archer. Richard Thomas Allwright. William Kent O'Keefe. Alfred Henry Bisdee. Thomas Gorringe. Charles M 'Arthur. Henry Gord.on Brock. William Benson. Alfred William Gilles. Edward William Birchall :Archibald M'Dowall. Butcher. J"AMES BAllNARD, . SOVERNMENT l'RIN·rnn; TASMANIA, .
Recommended publications
  • The Rifle Club Movement and Australian Defence 1860-1941
    The Rifle Club Movement and Australian Defence 1860-1941 Andrew Kilsby A thesis in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences February 2014 Abstract This thesis examines the rifle club movement and its relationship with Australian defence to 1941. It looks at the origins and evolution of the rifle clubs and associations within the context of defence developments. It analyses their leadership, structure, levels of Government and Defence support, motivations and activities, focusing on the peak bodies. The primary question addressed is: why the rifle club movement, despite its strong association with military rifle shooting, failed to realise its potential as an active military reserve, leading it to be by-passed by the military as an effective force in two world wars? In the 19th century, what became known as the rifle club movement evolved alongside defence developments in the Australian colonies. Rifle associations were formed to support the Volunteers and later Militia forces, with the first ‘national’ rifle association formed in 1888. Defence authorities came to see rifle clubs, especially the popular civilian rifle clubs, as a cheap defence asset, and demanded more control in return for ammunition grants, free rail travel and use of rifle ranges. At the same time, civilian rifle clubs grew in influence within their associations and their members resisted military control. An essential contradiction developed. The military wanted rifle clubs to conduct shooting ‘under service conditions’, which included drill; the rifle clubs preferred their traditional target shooting for money prizes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of India on Colonial Tasmanian Architecture and Artefacts
    The influence of India on colonial Tasmanian architecture and artefacts Lionel Morrell Background India has a long history of connections with Australia. Long before Captain Cook set foot on southern shores, cloth from ‘the Indies’ had traded its way from Gujarat and Coromandel down through the Indonesian archipelago to be traded with Aborigines by Makassar seamen negotiating seasonal camps to collect trepang, fish and pearl. According to Sharrad in Convicts, Call Centres and Cochin Kangaroos 1 it was men like Mitchell and Lang, from the 1820s on, who retired to land grants in Van Diemen’s Land and later other parts of Australia, who brought with them the verandahs of the Raj that became part of Australian architecture, and familiarity with India. As early as 1824, an attempt was made to found an institution for the sons of Anglo- Indians and British men in Van Diemen’s Land. Following the Indian mutiny of 1857, there was a rise in the numbers of Anglo-Indians settling in Australia, There were 372 Indian-born registered in 1881 2. Among them was Dr John Coverdale, born in 1814 in Kedgeree, Bengal, who was a medical practitioner at Richmond for many years. The term ‘Anglo-Indian’ was first used by Warren Hastings in the eighteenth century to describe both the British in India and their Indian-born children. 3 The first Anglo-Indian to settle in Tasmania was Rowland Walpole Loane in 1809, followed by many others, including Edward Dumaresq, a retired Indian Army officer who bought Mt Ireh in 1855 and lived there until his death in 1906 at the age of 104; Charles Swanston, who first came to VDL in 1828 on leave because of ill-health from his position as military paymaster in the provinces of Tranvancore and Tinnevelly in India and eventually settled here permanently in 1831 and Michael Fenton, who joined the 13 th Light Infantry in 1807 and served in India and Burma until 1828 when he sold his commission and emigrated to Van Diemen’s Land.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal History Journal: Volume 21
    Aboriginal History Volume twenty-one 1997 Aboriginal History Incorporated The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Secretary), Peter Grimshaw (Treasurer/Public Officer), Neil Andrews, Richard Baker, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Luise Hercus, Bill Humes, Ian Keen, David Johnston, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Diane Smith, Elspeth Young. Correspondents Jeremy Beckett, Valerie Chapman, Ian Clark, Eve Fesl, Fay Gale, Ronald Lampert, Campbell Macknight, Ewan Morris, John Mulvaney, Andrew Markus, Bob Reece, Henry Reynolds, Shirley Roser, Lyndall Ryan, Bruce Shaw, Tom Stannage, Robert Tonkinson, James Urry. Aboriginal History aims to present articles and information in the field of Australian ethnohistory, particularly in the post-contact history of the Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders. Historical studies based on anthropological, archaeological, linguistic and sociological research, including comparative studies of other ethnic groups such as Pacific Islanders in Australia will be welcomed. Issues include recorded oral traditions and biographies, narratives in local languages with translations, previously unpublished manuscript accounts, resumes of current events, archival and bibliographical articles, and book reviews. Editors 1997 Rob Paton and Di Smith, Editors, Luise Hercus, Review Editor and Ian Howie Willis, Managing Editor. Aboriginal History Monograph Series Published occasionally, the monographs present longer discussions or a series of articles on single subjects of contemporary interest. Previous monograph titles are D. Barwick, M. Mace and T. Stannage (eds), Handbook of Aboriginal and Islander History; Diane Bell and Pam Ditton, Law: the old the nexo; Peter Sutton, Country: Aboriginal boundaries and land ownership in Australia; Link-Up (NSW) and Tikka Wilson, In the Best Interest of the Child? Stolen children: Aboriginal pain/white shame, Jane Simpson and Luise Hercus, History in Portraits: biographies of nineteenth century South Australian Aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • Brothers Under Arms, the Tasmanian Volunteers
    [An earlier version was presented to Linford Lodge of Research. The improved version, below, was to have been presented to the Discovery Lodge of Research on 6 September 2012, but, owing to illness of the author, was simply published in the Transactions of Discovery Lodge in October 2012.] Brothers under Arms, the Tasmanian Volunteers by Bro Tony Pope Introduction For most of my life, as a newspaper reporter, police officer, and Masonic researcher, I have been guided by the advice of that sage old journalist, Bro Rudyard Kipling:1 I keep six honest serving men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. But this paper is experimental, in that I have also taken heed of the suggestions of three other brethren: Bro Richard Dawes, who asked the speakers at the Goulburn seminar last year to preface their talks with an account of how they set about researching and preparing their papers; Bro Bob James, who urges us to broaden the scope of our research, to present Freemasonry within its social context, and to emulate Socrates rather than Moses in our presentation; and Bro Trevor Stewart, whose advice is contained in the paper published in the July Transactions, ‘The curious case of Brother Gustav Petrie’. Tasmania 1995 Rudyard Kipling Richard Dawes Bob James Trevor Stewart I confess that I have not the slightest idea how to employ the Socratic method in covering my chosen subject, and I have not strained my brain to formulate Bro Stewart’s ‘third order or philosophical’ questions, but within those limitations this paper is offered as an honest attempt to incorporate the advice of these brethren.
    [Show full text]
  • L'ton Thematic History Report
    LAUNCESTON HERITAGE STUDY STAGE 1: THEMATIC HISTORY Prepared by Ian Terry & Nathalie Servant for Launceston City Council July 2002 © Launceston City Council Cover. Launceston in the mid nineteenth century (Sarah Ann Fogg, Launceston: Tamar Street Bridge area , Allport Library & Museum of Fine Arts, State Library of Tasmania). C O N T E N T S The Study Area ........................................................................................................................1 The Study .................................................................................................................................2 Authorship................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................3 Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................3 HISTORIC CONTEXT Introduction..............................................................................................................................4 1 Environmental Context .........................................................................................................5 2 Human Settlement.................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Intercolonial Exhibition Report of Tasmanian Commissioners
    (No. 66.) l 8 6 7. TASMANIA. LEGISLATIVE CO UN GIL. INTER COLONIAL EXHIBITION. REPORT OF THE TASMANIAN COMMISSIONERS. Laid upon the Table by. Sir R. Dry, and ordered by the Council to be printed, · October l 0, J 867. By His Excellency Colonel THOMAS GoRE BROWNE, Companion of the Most Honorable Order oftlte Bath, Capta,in-General and Governor-in­ Chief of Tasmania and its Dependencies. To the Honorable EDWARD ABBOTT, Esquire, M.L.C., JAMES WILSON AGNEW, Esquire, M.D., MORTON ALLPORT, Esquire, ABRAHAM BARRETT, Esquire, HENRY BUTLER, Esquire, M,H.A., EDWARD LEWIS DITCHAM, Esquire, ADYE DouGLAs, Esquire, M.H.A., · Mayor of Launceston, the Hunorable Sir RICHARD DRY, Knight, M.L.C., CHARLES GouLD, Esquire, RONALD CAMPBELL GUNN, Esquire, the Honorable . ALFRED KENNERLEY, Esquire, M.L.C., the lionorable ALEXANDER K1ssocK, Esquire, M.L.C., DAVID LEWIS, Esquire, M.H.A., THOMAS MACDOWELL, Esquire, the Honorable RoBERT OFFICER, Esquire, M.H,A, JAM~S RoirnRTSON, Esquire, JAMES SCOTT, Esquire, and RoBERT WALKER, Esquire, M.H.A., Mayor of Hobart Town. GREETING: WHEREAS it is expedient that a Commission be appointed for the purpose of making and carry­ ing out all necessary arrangements to enable the Colony of Tasmania to take due part in aid of the Inter-Colonial Exhibition to be held in Melbourne, _in tlie Colony of Victoria, during the current year: Know ye that I, reposing great trust and confidence in your fidelity, discretion, and integrity, have authorised and appointed, and do by these Presents authorise and appoint, you, or any three or more
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania's Neglected Children, Their Parents and State Care, 1890-1918
    PROTECTING THE INNOCENT: TASMANIA'S NEGLECTED CHILDREN, THEIR PARENTS AND STATE CARE, 1890-1918 CAROLINE EVANS BA (HONS) Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Tasmania, June 1999. AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution. To the best of the candidate's knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. For my daughters, Freya and Leah Sant and my mother, Cleone Evans CONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgments Map Notes on the Text Introduction 1 Part One: Reformers, Public Servants and Changing Concepts of Neglect in Childhood 1. The Neglected Child 17 2. "Poor wand'rers": Street Children and Welfare Reform 32 Liberal and Evangelical Influences on Child Welfare Policy 34 Challenges to and Support for Liberal Social Visions 42 The Introduction of Child Welfare Legislation, 1895-6 48 Street Children after 1896 56 Truancy 61 3. "The infant's wail": Children's Physical Efficiency and Welfare Reform 64 Child Welfare Reformers and National Efficiency 69 The Causes of Ex-Nuptial Infant Deaths 74 The 1907 Infant Life Protection Act 77 A "better provision for the protection of infant life"? 83 The Effects of World War I on Policy 87 "The most valuable department of the government": The Administration of the Neglected Children's Department 90 F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference to the Index of John Reynolds
    Reynolds DX.17 Donated by John and Prof. Henry Reynolds 1985 Access: open for consultation JOHN REYNOLDS John Reynolds (1899-1986) was educated at Friends' Schovl, Hobart, and Hobart Technical School, where he studied chemistry. He had a distinguished career as a metallurgist, starting with the E.Z.Co., and played a leading role in the establishment of the Australian aluminium industry with its beginnings at Bell Bay following the discovery of bauxite at Ouse in 1943. In 1939, at the beginning of the War, he was seconded to the Public Service as Commerce Officer, Department of Agriculture, Commerce & Industry Section, Hobart, to advise on the production of industrial charcoal for carbide manufacture. He was involved in making a contract for the sale of wolfram and tungsten to the British Government. He held a number of advisory and official posts in Tasmania during the next two decades, including responsibility for the implementation of the Grain Reserve Act 1950. John Reynolds main interest, however, lay in journalism and historical research. He won a Commonwealth Literary Fund Award for his biography of Toby Barton. He wrote a life of William Lawrence Baillieu, Launceston - the history of an Australian City (1969); Men &Mines (1974) and articles for the Australian Dictionary of Biography and the Transactions of the Tasmanian Historical Research Association. His last book, Countries of the mind, a biography of Edmund Morris Miller, completed in collaboration with Margaret Giordano, was published in 1987 after his death. DIARIES DX.17/ 1 Desk diaries 1945, 1950, 1955, 1960, 1976 Appointments and memoranda. MINING & BUSINESS 2 Australian Magnesium Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Magistrates & Justices of the Peace in Van Diemen’S Land
    Magistrates & Justices of the Peace in Van Diemen’s Land Entries in bold are those known to be Police Magistrates, Assistant Police Magistrates or Visiting Magistrates. Entries in normal text are listed as Magistrates until 1847 then as Justices of the Peace. Initials Magistrate's/JP’s Name Police District Residence Period ?H Major Harold Norfolk Island Norfolk Island 1847 AB Andrew Barclay Port Dalrymple Camden Vale 1824–1825 ABJ Algernon Burdett Jones Somerville, Westbury 1846 ABJ Algernon Burdett Jones Glenorchy Glenorchy 1847 AC Alexander Cheyne Launceston 1846 AC Alexander Cheyne Hobart 1847 AC Alexander Clerke Ravensworth, Norfolk 1846–1847 Plains ACE Arnold Charles Errington Port Arthur 1846 AD Arthur Davies 1846 AEW Augustus Hillier Eardley Wilmot New Norfolk New Norfolk 1847 AEW Augustus Eardley Wilmot Hobart 1848–1849 AFK Anthony Fenn Kemp Mount Vernon, Green 1846–1847 Ponds AG Arthur Gardiner Avoca 1838 AG Arthur Gardiner Launceston Launceston 1843, 1846 AG Arthur Gardiner Launceston Launceston 1847 AG Alfred Garrett Hobart 1846–1847 AM A Mackenzie Great Swanport 1834 AM Alexander McPherson Cluny, Bothwell 1846–1847 AM Afleck Moodie Hobart Hobart 1825–1827 AM Askin Morrison Hobart 1846–1847 AM A Mundy 1835 APM Assistant Police Magistrate AR A Reid 1830 AT Archibald Thomson Cormiston, West 1846 Tamar, Launceston AT Adam Turnbull Hobart 1846–1847 ATC Arthur Thomas Collett Ridgeside, Evandale 1846–1847 ATR Augustus Thomas Rice Hobart 1846 AW Abraham Walker Home Vale, Norfolk 1846–1847 Plains AWH AW Horne Norfolk Plains 1834 AWHH
    [Show full text]
  • Papers on Parliament: 'The Truest Patriotism': Andrew Inglis Clark And
    Papers on Parliament ‘The Truest Patriotism’: Andrew Inglis Clark and the Building of an Australian Nation Proceedings of a conference held at Parliament House, Canberra, on Friday 8 November 2013 Number 61 May 2014 Published and printed by the Department of the Senate Parliament House, Canberra ISSN 1031–976X Published by the Department of the Senate, 2014 ISSN 1031–976X Papers on Parliament is edited and managed by the Research Section, Department of the Senate. Edited by Dr Rosemary Laing and Dr David Headon Cover portrait of Andrew Inglis Clark by J.W. Beattie courtesy of the University of Tasmania Special and Rare Collections, http://eprints.utas.edu.au/11798 All editorial inquiries should be made to: Assistant Director of Research Research Section Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Telephone: (02) 6277 3164 Email: [email protected] To order copies of Papers on Parliament On publication, new issues of Papers on Parliament are sent free of charge to subscribers on our mailing list. If you wish to be included on that mailing list, please contact the Research Section of the Depart- ment of the Senate at: Telephone: (02) 6277 3074 Email: [email protected] Printed copies of previous issues of Papers on Parliament may be provided on request if they are available. Past issues are available online at: www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/pops Contents Opening Remarks Andrew Inglis Clark, Moby Dick and the Australian Constitution The Hon. Rev. Prof. Michael Tate AO 1 Political Thought and Practice Andrew Inglis Clark: A Dim View of Parliament? Dr Rosemary Laing 5 Shadow or Illumination? Kingston’s Rival Constitution The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Carriage Licences Amount Received 18669
    (No. 39.) 18 7 0. TASMANIA. ,c ARR I AGE LICE N C ES. AMOUNT RECEIVED, 1865-69. I7-Laid upon the Table by the Colonial Treasurer, and ordered by the House to be printed, August 23, 1870. RETURN of the Amounts received for CARRIAGE LICENCES in 186.15, 1866, 1867, 1868, and 1869 ; spec(fj;ing the various Municipalities and Police Districts throughout the L~land, with tlte Names of the Licencees in each District, and the Amounts paid in each Year in juxtaposition. NAME. NAME. ------·----!·--- ------------- -------------------- ----- £ .£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ Sir F. Smith ......... .. 2 l.m-Hobart Torvrt. J. C. Tolman ..••.••••. 2 George Wilson • • . • • . 2 2 2 2 John Fi~her .......... 4 Richard Lewis . .. • . • . 6 2 2 Frederick Rout ....... 2 Edward Wilkinson . 2 R. J. Lucas ......• , ... 2 Sir Valentine Fleming . 6 6 6 6 6 Chnrles Heathorn ..••.. 2 Robert Pate • • • • . • • • • . 2 ,John Strathern ....... 2 A. G. Webster......... 2 2 2 2 2 H. M. Nichol ......... 2 George Crisp . • . 2 2 4 2 2 J. T. Ruclall '(Melbourne) 2 Ebenezer W. Sims . • . • . 2 W. H. Gill ........... 2 John A. Watkins 2 2.' G. R. Napier ........ 2 2 2 Francis Flexmore . • . 4 4 4 4 4 Daniel Simpson , ...... 2 George Dexter • . • • . 2 2. 2 2 2 Richard Hill ...•..•... 2 2 Samuel Crisp, sen.. • • . 2 2 2 Richard Powis ..•..... 2 2 William Dossiter • • • • • . 2 2 2. 2 2 Thomas Jackson 2 2 Joseph Lester.......... 2 2 2 2 James A. Dunn ••...... 4 4 4 4 4 William Green • • • • • • . • 2 Ann Prentis .... 2 Robert Wiggins . • . • . • . 2 'William B. Watchorn .. 2 George Campbell . • • . 2 2 2 2 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Allocation in Tasmania Under the Waste Lands Acts, 1856-1889
    i Cronyism, Muddle and Money: Land Allocation in Tasmania under the Waste Lands Acts, 1856-1889 Bronwyn Meikle Grad Dip Hum (University of Tasmania 2007), B Business (Accounting) (CQU 2004), B Education (BCAE 1989), G Dip Teacher-Librarianship (BCAE 1980), Cert Teaching (KGCAE 1969). Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, August 2014 ii This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Bronwyn Dorothy Meikle iii This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree in any tertiary institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Bronwyn Dorothy Meikle iv Abstract With the granting of self-government to the colonies of eastern Australia in the 1850s, each colony became responsible for its own land legislation. Each produced legislation that enabled settlement by small farmers, the selectors. In New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland this led to conflict between the selectors and those who had previously established their sheep runs on the land, the squatters, as they became known in Australia. The land legislation also enabled the development of agriculture in those colonies. Tasmania produced twenty-one Waste Lands Acts over a period of thirty-one years, and introduced a number of land schemes to attract immigrants. In spite of these attempts, the Tasmanian economy remained in depression, agricultural output declined, and immigration stagnated.
    [Show full text]