DOCSLIB.ORG

Country of Origin Information Report China June 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country of Origin Information Report China June 2008 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT CHINA 1 JUNE 2008 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE CHINA 1 JUNE 2008 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN CHINA FROM 2 MAY TO 1 JUNE 2008 REPORTS ON CHINA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 MAY AND 1 JUNE 2008 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Map ................................................................................................ 1.04 Languages ................................................................................... 1.05 Population..................................................................................... 1.06 Naming conventions .................................................................. 1.07 Tibetan names ........................................................................... 1.08 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................. 2.01 Poverty .......................................................................................... 2.03 Currency........................................................................................ 2.05 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 1949-1976: The Mao Zedong era ................................................. 3.01 1978-1989: China under Deng Xiaoping..................................... 3.03 1990-2000: Post-Tiananmen Square........................................... 3.04 2000 onwards: A new generation of leaders.............................. 3.05 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ....................................................................... 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION ...................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................ 6.01 The leadership (fourth generation)............................................. 6.03 Chinese Communist Party (CCP)................................................ 6.04 Human Rights 7. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 7.01 8. SECURITY FORCES................................................................................. 8.01 Police............................................................................................. 8.02 Private security firms ................................................................. 8.05 Torture ....................................................................................... 8.06 Extra-judicial killings .................................................................. 8.13 Protection of witnesses / organised crime ................................. 8.14 Avenues of complaint .................................................................. 8.16 9. MILITARY SERVICE................................................................................. 9.01 Postponement and exemption .................................................... 9.04 Desertion....................................................................................... 9.06 10. JUDICIARY........................................................................................... 10.01 Organisation ................................................................................. 10.01 Independence ............................................................................... 10.02 Fair trial ......................................................................................... 10.05 Restrictions on lawyers ............................................................... 10.08 Criminal Procedure Law (1997)................................................... 10.11 ii This Country of Origin Information Report contains the most up-to-date publicly available information as at 1 June 2008. Older source material has been included where it contains relevant information not available in more recent documents. 1 JUNE 2008 CHINA State Security Law (1993) ............................................................ 10.12 Double jeopardy ........................................................................... 10.14 11. ARREST AND DETENTION – LEGAL RIGHTS............................................ 11.01 Arrest warrants............................................................................. 11.08 Wanted posters ............................................................................ 11.10 Resisting arrest/hitting an official............................................... 11.13 Punishment of minor offences.................................................... 11.15 12. PRISON CONDITIONS............................................................................ 12.01 Psychiatric custody (Ankang system)........................................ 12.06 Xiamen prison (Fujian Province)................................................. 12.10 Drapchi prison (Tibet) .................................................................. 12.11 Qushui prison (Tibet) ................................................................... 12.13 Other known detention facilities in Tibet ................................... 12.14 Administrative detention/labour camps..................................... 12.15 Re-education Through Labour (RTL)......................................... 12.15 Other forms of administrative detention..................................... 12.20 13. DEATH PENALTY.................................................................................. 13.01 Suspended death sentences....................................................... 13.07 Number of executions.................................................................. 13.08 Judicial oversight......................................................................... 13.10 People exempted from the death penalty .................................. 13.14 14. POLITICAL AFFILIATION........................................................................ 14.01 Freedom of political expression ................................................. 14.01 Freedom of association and assembly ...................................... 14.04 Civil disturbances....................................................................... 14.08 Opposition groups and political activists.................................. 14.14 China Democracy Party (CDP).................................................. 14.16 UK Branch of the China Democracy Party ................................ 14.21 Tiananmen Square activists ...................................................... 14.22 Responses to the ‘Nine Commentaries’ .................................... 14.26 15. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND MEDIA ........................................................ 15.01 Journalists .................................................................................... 15.09 16. HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONS, ORGANISATIONS AND ACTIVISTS............ 16.01 17. CORRUPTION....................................................................................... 17.01 Breaches of Party discipline ....................................................... 17.04 Guanxi (social connections) ....................................................... 17.06 18. FREEDOM OF RELIGION........................................................................ 18.01 Registration .................................................................................. 18.06 Buddhists...................................................................................... 18.14 Taoists........................................................................................... 18.16 Folk religions ................................................................................ 18.18 19. CHRISTIANS ........................................................................................ 19.01 Availability of Bibles .................................................................... 19.03 Proselytising................................................................................. 19.05 Catholics ....................................................................................... 19.07 Relations with the Vatican ......................................................... 19.14 Protestants (including ‘house churches’).................................. 19.17 Russian Orthodox Church........................................................... 19.22 20. MUSLIMS............................................................................................. 20.01 Uighurs (Uygur, Uyghur).............................................................. 20.03 Human rights in Xinjiang (East Turkestan) ................................ 20.06 Religious freedom in Xinjiang (East Turkestan)......................... 20.09 Uighur terrorist groups ............................................................... 20.13 Other Uighur opposition groups................................................. 20.15 This Country of Origin Information Report contains the most up-to-date publicly available information as at 1 June 2008. iii Older source material has been included where it contains relevant information not available in more recent documents. CHINA 1 JUNE 2008 Hui (Huihui) ................................................................................... 20.17 21. BANNED SPIRITUAL GROUPS ................................................................ 21.01 The Shouters (Huhan Pai) or Local Church..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Palacký University Olomouc Faculty of Education Institute of Education and Social Studies
    Palacký University Olomouc Faculty of Education Institute of Education and Social Studies The Representation of China in History Textbooks of the United Kingdom，1991-2015 ZHANG Lijuan, ME.d Supervisor doc. Mgr. Štefan Chudý, Ph.D Olomouc, Czech Republic 2018 ZHANG Lijuan The Representation of China in History Textbooks of the United Kingdom，1991-2015 Declaration of Originality I, ZHANG Lijuan (Student number 80062329) declare that this dissertation entitled “The Representation of China in History Textbooks of the United Kingdom, 1991-2015” submitted as partial requirement for Ph.D. study programme of Education is my original work and that all the sources in any form (e.g. ideas, figures, texts, tables, etc.) that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged in the text as well as in the list of references. _____________________ _________________ Signature Date I ZHANG Lijuan The Representation of China in History Textbooks of the United Kingdom，1991-2015 Acknowledgement My doctoral study at Palacký University will come to an end soon. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to many people who supported me during my study. First and foremost, I would like to express my great appreciation and sincere thanks to my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Štefan Chudý, Ph.D. You have provided me with good suggestions and instructions in my study. Especially when I lost my confidence, your encouragement and support gave me so much power and really cheered me up. I would like to thank Doc. PhDr. Hana Marešová, Ph.D., Doc. PhDr. Zdeněk Novotný, CSc., Doc. Mgr. Miroslav Dopita, Ph.D., Danping Peng and other members of the academic committee for your comments and suggestions on my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2003: China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong and Macau)
    Page 1 of 66 China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 (Note: Also see the section for Tibet, the report for Hong Kong, and the report for Macau.) The People's Republic of China (PRC) is an authoritarian state in which, as directed by the Constitution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP or Party) is the paramount source of power. Party members hold almost all top government, police, and military positions. Ultimate authority rests with the 24-member political bureau (Politburo) of the CCP and its 9-member standing committee. Leaders made a top priority of maintaining stability and social order and were committed to perpetuating the rule of the CCP and its hierarchy. Citizens lacked both the freedom peacefully to express opposition to the Party-led political system and the right to change their national leaders or form of government. Socialism continued to provide the theoretical underpinning of national politics, but Marxist economic planning has given way to pragmatism, and economic decentralization increased the authority of local officials. The Party's authority rested primarily on the Government's ability to maintain social stability; appeals to nationalism and patriotism; Party control of personnel, media, and the security apparatus; and continued improvement in the living standards of most of the country's 1.3 billion citizens. The Constitution provides for an independent judiciary; however, in practice, the Government and the CCP, at both the central and local levels, frequently interfered in the judicial process and directed verdicts in many high-profile cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporters Without Borders Xiaoning-31-08-2012,43312.Html
    Reporters Without Borders http://www.rsf.org/chine-cyber-dissident-wang- xiaoning-31-08-2012,43312.html Asia - China Free at last Cyber dissident Wang Xiaoning freed but many Chinese netizens still in prison 2 September 2012 Reporters Without Borders acknowledges the release today of the cyber dissident Wang Xiaoning. “We are relieved to know that Wang Xiaoning is finally free and we share the joy of his family and friends,” the press freedom organization said. “However, we note that he served his sentence in its entirety and there has been no question of leniency on the part of the Chinese authorities. We urge the latter to allow Wang Xiaoning to lead a normal life and spare him the surveillance and intimidation to which many dissidents are subjected after they leave prison. “We repeat our appeal for the release of the 67 netizens and journalists still in prison in China for their reporting activities. In particular, we would like to draw attention to the case of the dissident Chen Pingfu, whose trial is due to open on 5 September. The charges against him must be dropped and he must be released as soon as possible. “As regards the leadership of Yahoo!, it would be best if they communicated more clearly how they deal with requests from the Chinese authorities for personal data and other possible instances of collaboration with China’s censors which may not have been made public up to now. It is also vital that the company uses its influence in China to obtain the early release of the journalist and cyber dissident Shi Tao.” Wang was arrested in September 2002 and sentenced the following September to 10 years’ imprisonment and two years’ deprivation of his civil rights for “incitement to subversion”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Tiananmen: 20 Years of Oppression, Activism and Hope Chrd
    THE LEGACY OF TIANANMEN: 20 YEARS OF OPPRESSION, ACTIVISM AND HOPE CHRD Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) Web: Hhttp://crd-net.org/H Email: [email protected] THE LEGACY OF TIANANMEN: 20 YEARS OF OPPRESSION, ACTIVISM AND HOPE Chinese Human Rights Defenders June 1, 2009 Twenty years since the Tiananmen massacre, the Chinese government refuses to accept responsibility, much less apologize or offer compensation, for killing, injuring, imprisoning and persecuting individuals for participating in peaceful protests. The number of the victims, and their names and identities, remain unknown. Families continue to be barred from publicly commemorating and seeking accountability for the death of their loved ones. Activists are persecuted and harassed for independently investigating the crackdown or for calling for a rectification of the government’s verdict on the pro‐democracy movement. Many individuals continue to suffer the consequences of participating in the pro‐democracy movement today. At least eight individuals remain imprisoned in Beijing following unfair trials in which they were convicted of committing “violent crimes”. Those who were released after long sentences have had difficulty re‐integrating into society as they suffer from continued police harassment as well as illnesses and injuries resulting from torture, beatings and mistreatment while in prison. Many of those injured have had to pay for their own medical expenses and continue to struggle as the physical and psychological scars leave them unable to take care of themselves or to work. Some who took part in the protests still find it difficult to make ends meet after they were dismissed from comfortable jobs or expelled from universities after 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008
    L A O G A I HANDBOOK 劳 改 手 册 2007 – 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation Washington, DC 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation, founded in 1992, is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization [501 (c) (3)] incorporated in the District of Columbia, USA. The Foundation’s purpose is to gather information on the Chinese Laogai - the most extensive system of forced labor camps in the world today – and disseminate this information to journalists, human rights activists, government officials and the general public. Directors: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao LRF Board: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao, Lodi Gyari Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008 Copyright © The Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) All Rights Reserved. The Laogai Research Foundation 1109 M St. NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 408-8300 / 8301 Fax: (202) 408-8302 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.laogai.org ISBN 978-1-931550-25-3 Published by The Laogai Research Foundation, October 2008 Printed in Hong Kong US $35.00 Our Statement We have no right to forget those deprived of freedom and 我们没有权利忘却劳改营中失去自由及生命的人。 life in the Laogai. 我们在寻求真理, 希望这类残暴及非人道的行为早日 We are seeking the truth, with the hope that such horrible 消除并且永不再现。 and inhumane practices will soon cease to exist and will never recur. 在中国，民主与劳改不可能并存。 In China, democracy and the Laogai are incompatible. THE LAOGAI RESEARCH FOUNDATION Table of Contents Code Page Code Page Preface 前言 ...............................................................…1 23 Shandong Province 山东省.............................................. 377 Introduction 概述 .........................................................…4 24 Shanghai Municipality 上海市 .......................................... 407 Laogai Terms and Abbreviations 25 Shanxi Province 山西省 ................................................... 423 劳改单位及缩写............................................................28 26 Sichuan Province 四川省 ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Custody: People Imprisoned in Connection with Journalism Or the Internet
    In Custody: People Imprisoned in Connection with Journalism or the Internet The official directive from China's Propaganda Bureau this past November prohibiting the reporting of incidents of unrest indicates how threatened the Chinese authorities feel by the dissemination of accurate information regarding current events. Likewise indicative is the rash of detentions of journalists and writers at the end of 2004. While many of these detentions were temporary, they have had an intimi- dating effect on writers, and a number of those detained remain in custody awaiting formal charges. On the 2004 index of press freedom issued by Reporters sans Frontieres, China is exceeded only by North Korea and Myanmar in its censorship and persecution of journal- ists, and tops the list of countries imprisoning journalists. The list below employs a broad definition of journalism to include a wide range of activities related to free expression and access to information. Even so, the list cannot claim to be comprehensive, and there is no doubt but that many more people are languishing in prison for no crime greater than the peaceful expression of their views. Sources: HRIC, Independent Chinese PEN Center, Human Rights Watch, Reporters sans Frontìeres, Committee to Protect Journalists, International PEN, Amnesty International Abbreviations: CDP—China Democracy Party; CDF—Chinese Democratic Federation; WAF—Workers Autonomous Federation; FLUC—Free Labor Union of China; CFDP—China Freedom and Democracy Party; RTL—Reeducation Through Labor; PSB—Public Security Bureau DATE OF DETENTION/ NAME LOCATION ARREST BACKGROUND SENTENCE OFFENSE PRISON Chen Renjie Fujian Jul-83 In September 1982 Chen, Aug-83, life propaganda and incitement Lin Youping and Chen Biling to encourage the overthrow published a pamphlet entitled of the people's democratic Freedom Report and distributed dictatorship around 300 copies in Fuzhou.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 14, Spring 2000, No. 1 Judicial Psychiatry in China
    COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF ASIAN LAW VOL. 14, SPRING 2000, NO. 1 JUDICIAL PSYCHIATRY IN CHINA AND ITS POLITICAL ABUSES * ROBIN MUNRO I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 II. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON ETHICAL PSYCHIATRY.......................................6 III. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................10 A. LAW AND PSYCHIATRY PRIOR TO 1949 .......................................................................10 B. THE EARLY YEARS OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC ..........................................................13 C. THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION .....................................................................................22 D. PSYCHIATRIC ABUSE IN THE POST-MAO ERA ..............................................................34 IV. A SHORT GUIDE TO POLITICAL PSYCHOSIS ...............................................................38 A. MANIFESTATIONS OF COUNTERREVOLUTIONARY BEHAVIOR BY THE MENTALLY ILL ...38 B. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PARANOIAC AND A POLITICAL DISSIDENT?......40 V. THE LEGAL CONTEXT.......................................................................................................42 A. LEGAL NORMS AND JUDICIAL PROCESS.......................................................................42 B. COUNTERREVOLUTIONARY CRIMES IN CHINA .............................................................50 VI. THE ANKANG: CHINA’S SPECIAL PSYCHIATRIC
    [Show full text]
  • The Olympics Countdown – Failing to Keep Human Rights Promises
    People’s Republic of China The Olympics countdown – failing to keep human rights promises Introduction With just two years to go until the Olympic Games take place in Beijing, the Chinese authorities are failing to meet the human rights commitments they made when Beijing was awarded the Olympics in April 2001.1 Serious human rights violations continue to be reported across the country fueling instability and discontent. Grassroots human rights activists continue to be detained and imprisoned, and official controls over the media and the Internet are growing tighter. While there have been some positive legislative and judicial changes in connection with the application of the death penalty, progress appears to have stalled in connection with other punishments, including “Re-education through Labour” (RTL) and other abusive forms of administrative detention. This report summarizes a number of Amnesty International’s human rights concerns in China – concerns which the organization is continuing to highlight as key areas for reform in the run-up to the Olympics. They are: the continuing use of the death penalty and abusive forms of administrative detention, the arbitrary detention, imprisonment, torture and harassment of human rights defenders, including journalists and lawyers, and the censorship of the Internet. Amnesty International considers that positive reforms in all of these areas are essential if China is to live up to its promises to improve human rights. Each section is accompanied by recommendations, summarized at the end of the report, which Amnesty International considers would constitute significant and concrete progress in the run-up to the Olympics. They form a core component of the organization’s broader agenda for human rights reform in China.
    [Show full text]
  • “Race to the Bottom” RIGHTS Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship WATCH August 2006 Volume 18, No
    China HUMAN “Race to the Bottom” RIGHTS Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship WATCH August 2006 Volume 18, No. 8(C) “Race to the Bottom” Corporate Complicity in Chinese Internet Censorship Map of the People’s Republic of China..................................................................................... 1 I. Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 II. How Censorship Works in China: A Brief Overview........................................................ 9 1. The “Great Firewall of China”: Censorship at the Internet backbone and ISP level.................................................................................................. 9 2. Censorship by Internet Content Providers: Delegating censorship to business...................................................................................................................... 11 3. Surveillance and censorship in email and web chat.................................................... 14 4. Breaching the Great Chinese Firewall .......................................................................... 15 5. Chinese and International Law...................................................................................... 17 III. Comparative Analysis of Search Engine Censorship...................................................... 25 1. Censorship through website de-listing ......................................................................... 25 2. Keyword censorship.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ankang: China's Special Psychiatric Hospitals
    The Ankang: China’s Special Psychiatric Hospitals ROBIN MUNRO * In the former Soviet Union during the Khrushchev–Brezhnev era, the KGB used its forensic psychiatric institutions to brand, arbitrarily and for political reasons, large numbers of political dissidents as suffering from ‘schizophrenia’ and ‘paranoid psychosis’ and then incarcerated them for long periods in ‘special psychiatric hospitals’. In 1976, the Soviet Union was severely censured on this account by psychiatrists from all over the world at a conference in Hawaii of the World Psychiatric Association. Only after Gorbachev’s rise to power were these errors rectified. We have now discovered that similar such practices have also occurred in certain parts of China.1 Jia Yicheng (China’s top forensic psychiatrist), 1998 Since the earliest years of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), political dissidents, religious nonconformists, ‘whistle-blowers’ and other dissenting citizens have consistently been viewed by the Communist Party as posing a major political threat to society. Even in today’s economically more open China, such people continue to be arrested and imprisoned as enemies of the state. Until 1997, the criminal charge of choice under the PRC legal system was ‘counterrevolution’, while nowadays the less politically sounding charge of ‘endangering state security’ is most often applied.2 In a significant minority of such cases, however, the official psychiatric literature in China unequivocally records that, since the late 1950s, detained dissidents of various kinds have additionally been ordered to undergo examination by police psychiatrists, a process known as ‘forensic psychiatric evaluation’, and have then been labelled as * Research Associate in the School of Law, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London; and Research Director at China Labour Bulletin, Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Shi Tao, Yahoo!, and the Lessons for Corporate Social Responsibility
    Shi Tao, Yahoo!, and the lessons for corporate social responsibility A working paper (Version 1.0 – December 30, 2007) by Rebecca MacKinnon Assistant Professor, Journalism & Media Studies Centre, University of Hong Kong e-mail: [email protected] weblog: http://rconversation.blogs.com Corrections and comments welcome. Future revisions will be posted at: http://rconversation.blogs.com/about.html This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. (In other words: you are welcome to distribute this document to your students, friends, colleagues, whoever, as long as you attribute me as the author and don’t publish it for profit.) ABSTRACT: In 2005, Chinese journalist Shi Tao was convicted and sentenced to ten years in prison for leaking state secrets abroad. Key evidence cited in Chinese court documents included information about Shi’s account supplied by Yahoo! to the Chinese State Security Bureau. Condemnation by human rights groups and investors, U.S. congressional hearings, a Hong Kong government investigation, and a U.S. lawsuit followed. This paper documents the core facts, events, issues and debates involved. The Shi Tao case highlights the complex challenges of corporate social responsibility for Internet and telecommunications companies: They are caught between demands of governments on one hand and rights of users on the other – not only in authoritarian countries such as China but in virtually all countries around the world.
    [Show full text]