Society for Threatened Peoples Imprint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Society for Threatened Peoples Imprint April 2012 society for threatened peoples Imprint For human rights. Worldwide. Society for Threatened Peoples (STP) P.O. Box 2024, D-37010 Goettingen Tel.: ++49 551 49906-0 Fax: ++49 551 58028 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.gfbv.de Donation Account: 1909 Bank Code: 260 500 01 Bank: Sparkasse Göttingen (IBAN) DE 87 2605 0001 0000 0019 09 (BIC) NOLADE 21 GOE Society for Threatened Peoples has been acredited with the dzi-Certificate testifying to the transparency and proper usage of donations. Society for Threatened Peoples (STP) is an international human rights organisation which campaigns with and on behalf of threatened and persecuted ethnic and religious minorities, nationalities and indigenous peoples. STP has had an advisory status at the United Nations (UN) since 1993 and participant status at the Council of Europe (COE) since 2005. Text: Ulrich Delius Translation: Robert Kurth, Elizabeth Crawford, Owen Beith, Kaan Orhon Cover picture: In Goettingen's partner city Nanjing in prison: the writer Yang Tongyan Price: 10 Euros Published by Society for Threatened Peoples, April 2012 society for threatened peoples Enemies of the State – Persecuted Writers in China ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents: Enemies of the State – Persecuted Writers in China Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 1 Synopsis ...................................................................................................................................... 3 The Communist Party's Cultural Offensive ................................................................................ 7 Dissident Writers in Trouble ...................................................................................................... 9 Perfecting Censorship .............................................................................................................. 10 Fear Leads to Self-Censorship .................................................................................................. 11 Misleading Figures .................................................................................................................... 13 (Han) Chinese Writers in Prison ............................................................................................... 15 Tibetan Writers in Prison.......................................................................................................... 48 Uyghur Writers in Prison .......................................................................................................... 62 Mongolian Writers in Prison .................................................................................................... 72 Writers subjected to Harassment ............................................................................................ 76 Persecuted Artists, Comedians and Filmmakers ...................................................................... 95 List of Writers in Prison .......................................................................................................... 102 List of Persecuted Artists ........................................................................................................ 104 List of Writers subjected to Harassment (House Arrests, Threats) ....................................... 104 List of Released writers .......................................................................................................... 106 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 109 1 Enemies of the State – Persecuted Writers in China ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 Enemies of the State – Persecuted Writers in China ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Synopsis The new Society for Threatened Peoples (STP) human rights report, Enemies of the State - Persecuted Writers in China, documents the imprisonment of 54 writers and Internet authors in the People's Republic of China who are currently being held prisoner for political reasons, whether in secret prisons, work camps or in conventional prisons. The disproportionately high percentage of ethnic Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians among these political prisoners is striking. Although these "national minorities" make up only 20 million of the 1.4 billion inhabitants of the People's Republic, 28 of the 54 jailed writers are of these "nationalities:" 16 Tibetans, 10 Uyghurs, and 2 Mongolians. The other 26 imprisoned dissident authors are Han Chinese. The high percentage of "nationalities" among the arrested authors is an indication of how drastically political persecution has been stepped up, particularly in their regions. Other prominent exponents of the traditional cultures of Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians are also targets of repression. This clearly contradicts the Chinese government's claim that they are making serious efforts to preserve the cultural assets of these minorities. In particular, writers and Internet authors who advocate reconciliation between minorities and Han Chinese are often the victims of arbitrary imprisonment. Tibetan Internet author Tsering Woeser, currently being held under house arrest, as well as Uyghur Gheyret Niyaz, who has been condemned to a prison sentence of many years, made huge efforts to ease the escalating tensions between the nationalities and the majority Han Chinese population. Internet author Gheyret Niyaz has been sentenced to 15 years in jail for describing in an interview his unsuccessful attempt to warn the Chinese authorities of an imminent outbreak of protests in Urumqi. More than 200 people were killed in the ensuing protests in July 2009. Niyaz's biggest mistake was stating publicly that the Chinese authorities knew in advance of the impending turmoil and intentionally failed to take any action to defuse the situation. While the number of writers imprisoned has declined in recent years, it would be incorrect to conclude from this that persecution of dissident authors in China has abated. On the contrary; suppression of free speech has become far more subtle. Chinese state security forces are moving away from long prison sentences as an instrument of repression used against authors, because it has done lasting damage to the international image of the People's Republic. China's reputation around the world suffered severely from the incarcerations of writer Liu Xiaobo and artist Ai Weiwei. That is why security forces in China have instead begun using threats and intimidation much earlier and more decisively against writers who are critical of the government. The aim is to force authors to censor themselves in order to avoid harm to themselves and their families. In the past two years, 55 of 70 honorary members of the Independent Chinese PEN Center have been released from prison. But the pressure on dissident writers continues to grow. The "cultural reform" announced by the Communist Party of China, or CPC, in October 2011 3 Enemies of the State – Persecuted Writers in China ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ only resulted in stricter controls for writers, Internet authors and bloggers. In the scope of this so-called "reform" the CPC has interfered in cultural affairs more than ever. The omnipotent state publishing houses, editorial boards, and propaganda departments have been subjected to political cleansing. More restrictive regulations are applied for the issuing of ISBN numbers for new books, and state publishers are unequivocally called upon to promote "socialist values." In numerous various internal directives, furthermore, the CPC proclaimed that in all cultural discussions the party must guide opinion, the "Marxist viewpoint" is the decisive viewpoint, and the "stability and unity of the country" as well as the "harmonious society" must not be endangered. In other words, writers must steer clear of any criticism relating to ethnic, social, constitutional or political topics to avoid getting into trouble with the state security forces. In the face of continuing intimidation, even after their release from prison, many authors are now adhering to these strict regulations in order to protect themselves and their families. This report focuses on 25 writers as well as three artists and filmmakers who are not officially in prison, but who are under massive pressure from the state security forces and live in fear for their lives. There are dozens of similar cases that could be added to those detailed here, but only a few cases from the past five months are presented as an example. Meanwhile, state security forces continue use these tactics and are growing more brazen from month to month. The released dissidents, for example, regularly receive invitations to "tea" – but this is a form of code; in reality they are subjected to yet another interrogation. They are intimidated and threatened, their families are threatened, relatives lose their jobs, friends and relatives are not allowed to visit, friends are explicitly intimidated, police keep the writers' residences and activities under surveillance - either around the clock or just on so-called "sensitive occasions." Writers are arbitrarily restricted in their movements and placed under
Recommended publications
  • Confession, Redemption, and Death: Liu Xiaobo and the Protest Movement of 1989
    Confession, Redemption, and Death: Liu Xiaobo and the Protest Movement of 1989 Geremie Barmé1 There should be room for my extremism; I certainly don’t demand of others that they be like me... I’m pessimistic about mankind in general, but my pessimism does not allow for escape. Even though I might be faced with nothing but a series of tragedies, I will still struggle, still show my opposition. This is why I like Nietzsche and dislike Schopenhauer. Liu Xiaobo, November 19882 I FROM 1988 to early 1989, it was a common sentiment in Beijing that China was in crisis. Economic reform was faltering due to the lack of a coherent program of change or a unified approach to reforms among Chinese leaders and ambitious plans to free prices resulted in widespread panic over inflation; the question of political succession to Deng Xiaoping had taken alarming precedence once more as it became clear that Zhao Ziyang was under attack; nepotism was rife within the Party and corporate economy; egregious corruption and inflation added to dissatisfaction with educational policies and the feeling of hopelessness among intellectuals and university students who had profited little from the reforms; and the general state of cultural malaise and social ills combined to create a sense of impending doom. On top of this, the government seemed unwilling or incapable of attempting to find any new solutions to these problems. It enlisted once more the aid of propaganda, empty slogans, and rhetoric to stave off the mounting crisis. University students in Beijing appeared to be particularly heavy casualties of the general malaise.
    [Show full text]
  • Standoff at Tiananmen: Recollections of 1989: the Making of Goddess of Democracy
    2019/4/23 Standoff At Tiananmen: Recollections of 1989: The Making of Goddess of Democracy 更多 创建博客 登录 Standoff At Tiananmen How Chinese Students Shocked the World with a Magnificent Movement for Democracy and Liberty that Ended in the Tragic Tiananmen Massacre in 1989. Relive the history with this blog and my book, "Standoff at Tiananmen", a narrative history of the movement. Home Days People Documents Pictures Books Recollections Memorials Monday, May 30, 2011 "Standoff at Tiananmen" English Language Edition Recollections of 1989: The Making of Goddess of Democracy Click on the image to buy at Amazon "Standoff at Tiananmen" Chinese Language Edition On May 30, 1989, the statue Goddess of Democracy was erected at Tiananmen Square and became one of the lasting symbols of the 1989 student movement. The following is a re-telling of the making of that statue, originally published in the book Children of Dragon, by a sculptor named Cao Xinyuan: Nothing excites a sculptor as much as seeing a work of her own creation take shape. But although I was watching the creation of a sculpture that I had had no part in making, I nevertheless felt the same excitement. It was the "Goddess of Democracy" statue that stood for five days in Tiananmen Square. Until last year I was a graduate student at the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing, where the sculpture was made. I was living there when these events took place. 点击图像去Amazon购买 Students and faculty of the Central Academy of Fine Arts, which is located only a short distance from Tiananmen Square, had from the beginning been actively involved in the demonstrations.
    [Show full text]
  • China Human Rights Report 2009
    臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 本出版品係由財團法人臺灣民主基金會負責出版。臺灣民主基金會是 一個獨立、非營利的機構,其宗旨在促進臺灣以及全球民主、人權的 研究與發展。臺灣民主基金會成立於二○○三年,是亞洲第一個國家 級民主基金會,未來基金會志在與其他民主國家合作,促進全球新一 波的民主化。 This is a publication of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD). The TFD is an independent, non-profit foundation dedicated to the study and promotion of democracy and human rights in Taiwan and abroad. Founded in 2003, the TFD is the first democracy assistance foundation established in Asia. The Foundation is committed to the vision of working together with other democracies, to advance a new wave of democratization worldwide. 本報告由臺灣民主基金會負責出版,報告內容不代表本會意見。 版權所有,非經本會事先書面同意,不得翻印、轉載及翻譯。 This report is published by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. Statements of fact or opinion appearing in this report do not imply endorsement by the publisher. All rights reserved. No portion of the contents may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the publisher. Taiwan Foundation for Democracy China Human Rights Report 2009 CONTENTS Foreword ....................................................................................................................i Chapter I: Preface ............................................................................................. 1 Chapter II: Social Rights .......................................................................... 25 Chapter III: Political Rights ................................................................... 39 Chapter IV: Judicial Rights ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download (2595Kb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/131594 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Learning to Teach Moral Education through Drama in a Chinese Primary School By Mengyu Feng A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Philosophy Centre for Education Studies March 2019 Abstract This thesis explores the possibilities of introducing drama to facilitate primary children’s moral learning in the Chinese educational context. As she is an inexperienced teacher, the author also focuses on her own self-improvement in learning to teach through educational drama as well as examining drama’s potential to complement the moral education curriculum for primary aged children in China. The thesis begins with a literature review that explores the authority-oriented nature of the moral education curriculum in mainland China and points out that basic challenges still exist in the current course despite reforms that have been implemented since 1999 on a national scale. It then argues for the potential of story-based drama as an innovative pedagogy that may help students develop their autonomous moral thinking as a way to address some of the shortcomings that exist in the present moral curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2007 ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 10, 2007 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 2007 ANNUAL REPORT VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2007 ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 10, 2007 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–026 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 01:22 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 38026.TXT CHINA1 PsN: CHINA1 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman BYRON DORGAN, North Dakota, Co-Chairman MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio MAX BAUCUS, Montana TOM UDALL, New Mexico CARL LEVIN, Michigan MICHAEL M. HONDA, California DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California TIM WALZ, Minnesota SHERROD BROWN, Ohio CHRISTOPHER H.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Republic of China
    PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA NINE YEARS AFTER TIANANMEN - STILL A “COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY RIOT" ? INTRODUCTION The 4th of June 1998 will mark the ninth anniversary of the massacre of hundreds of unarmed civilians in Beijing on 4 June 1989, when heavily armed troops and hundreds of armoured military vehicles stormed into the city to clear the streets of pro-democracy demonstrators, firing at onlookers and protesters in the process. In the aftermath of the massacre, thousands of people were detained throughout China. Some received long sentences and are still imprisoned. Amnesty International maintains records of over 250 people who are still imprisoned in connection with the 1989 pro-democracy protests and believes the real number is much higher than the cases it has identified. Every year, new cases of political prisoners imprisoned since 1989 have come to light. Nine years after the massacre and the massive arrests which followed, the Chinese authorities still appear unwilling to reassess the official “verdict” passed at the time that the protests were a “counter-revolutionary riot”. So far, the authorities have taken no step to publicly investigate the killings and bring to justice those found responsible for human rights violations, or to review the cases of those still imprisoned for their activities during the protests. This official “verdict” was used in 1989 to justify the brutal suppression of the protests, despite clear evidence that the seven-weeks protests, starting in mid-April 1989, were overwhelmingly peaceful and drew wide popular support. Several million people took part in the demonstrations, demanding an end to official corruption and calling for political reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiananmen Square Fast Facts
    HOME | CNN - ASIA PACIFIC Tiananmen Square Fast Facts CNN May 20, 12:34 pm News 2019 Here is some information about the events in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on June 3-4, 1989. Facts: Tiananmen Square is located in the center of Beijing, the capital of China. Tiananmen means “gate of heavenly peace.” In 1989, after several weeks of demonstrations, Chinese troops entered Tiananmen Square on June 4 and fired on civilians. Estimates of the death toll range from several hundred to thousands. It has been estimated that as many as 10,000 people were arrested during and after the protests. Several dozen people have been executed for their parts in the demonstrations. Timeline: April 15, 1989 – Hu Yaobang, a former Communist Party leader, dies. Hu had worked to move China toward a more open political system and had become a symbol of democratic reform. April 18, 1989 – Thousands of mourning students march through the capital to Tiananmen Square, calling for a more democratic government. In the weeks that follow, thousands of people join the students in the square to protest against China’s Communist rulers. May 13, 1989 – More than 100 students begin a hunger strike in Tiananmen Square. The number increases to several thousand over the next few days. May 19, 1989 – A rally at Tiananmen Square draws an estimated 1.2 million people. General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, Zhao Ziyang, appears at the rally and pleads for an end to the demonstrations. May 19, 1989 – Premier Li Peng imposes martial law. June 1, 1989 – China halts live American news telecasts in Beijing, including CNN.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Tiananmen: 20 Years of Oppression, Activism and Hope Chrd
    THE LEGACY OF TIANANMEN: 20 YEARS OF OPPRESSION, ACTIVISM AND HOPE CHRD Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) Web: Hhttp://crd-net.org/H Email: [email protected] THE LEGACY OF TIANANMEN: 20 YEARS OF OPPRESSION, ACTIVISM AND HOPE Chinese Human Rights Defenders June 1, 2009 Twenty years since the Tiananmen massacre, the Chinese government refuses to accept responsibility, much less apologize or offer compensation, for killing, injuring, imprisoning and persecuting individuals for participating in peaceful protests. The number of the victims, and their names and identities, remain unknown. Families continue to be barred from publicly commemorating and seeking accountability for the death of their loved ones. Activists are persecuted and harassed for independently investigating the crackdown or for calling for a rectification of the government’s verdict on the pro‐democracy movement. Many individuals continue to suffer the consequences of participating in the pro‐democracy movement today. At least eight individuals remain imprisoned in Beijing following unfair trials in which they were convicted of committing “violent crimes”. Those who were released after long sentences have had difficulty re‐integrating into society as they suffer from continued police harassment as well as illnesses and injuries resulting from torture, beatings and mistreatment while in prison. Many of those injured have had to pay for their own medical expenses and continue to struggle as the physical and psychological scars leave them unable to take care of themselves or to work. Some who took part in the protests still find it difficult to make ends meet after they were dismissed from comfortable jobs or expelled from universities after 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Prodigals in Love: Narrating Gay Identity and Collectivity on the Early Internet in China
    Prodigals in Love: Narrating Gay Identity and Collectivity on the Early Internet in China by Gang Pan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of East Asian Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Gang Pan 2015 Prodigals in Love: Narrating Gay Identity and Collectivity on the Early Internet in China Gang Pan Doctor of Philosophy Department of East Asian Studies University of Toronto 2015 Abstract This dissertation concerns itself with the eruption of a large number of gay narratives on the Chinese internet in its first decade. There are two central arguments. First, the composing and sharing of narratives online played the role of a social movement that led to the formation of gay identity and collectivity in a society where open challenges to the authorities were minimal. Four factors, 1) the primacy of the internet, 2) the vernacular as an avenue of creativity and interpretation, 3) the transitional experience of the generation of the internet, and 4) the evolution of gay narratives, catalyzed by the internet, enhanced, amplified, and interacted with each other in a highly complicated and accelerated dynamic, engendered a virtual gay social movement. Second, many online gay narratives fall into what I term “prodigal romance,” which depicts gay love as parent-obligated sons in love with each other, weaving in violent conflicts between desire and duty in its indigenous context. The prodigal part of this model invokes the archetype of the Chinese prodigal, who can only return home having excelled and with the triumph of his journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008
    L A O G A I HANDBOOK 劳 改 手 册 2007 – 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation Washington, DC 2008 The Laogai Research Foundation, founded in 1992, is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization [501 (c) (3)] incorporated in the District of Columbia, USA. The Foundation’s purpose is to gather information on the Chinese Laogai - the most extensive system of forced labor camps in the world today – and disseminate this information to journalists, human rights activists, government officials and the general public. Directors: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao LRF Board: Harry Wu, Jeffrey Fiedler, Tienchi Martin-Liao, Lodi Gyari Laogai Handbook 劳改手册 2007-2008 Copyright © The Laogai Research Foundation (LRF) All Rights Reserved. The Laogai Research Foundation 1109 M St. NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 408-8300 / 8301 Fax: (202) 408-8302 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.laogai.org ISBN 978-1-931550-25-3 Published by The Laogai Research Foundation, October 2008 Printed in Hong Kong US $35.00 Our Statement We have no right to forget those deprived of freedom and 我们没有权利忘却劳改营中失去自由及生命的人。 life in the Laogai. 我们在寻求真理, 希望这类残暴及非人道的行为早日 We are seeking the truth, with the hope that such horrible 消除并且永不再现。 and inhumane practices will soon cease to exist and will never recur. 在中国,民主与劳改不可能并存。 In China, democracy and the Laogai are incompatible. THE LAOGAI RESEARCH FOUNDATION Table of Contents Code Page Code Page Preface 前言 ...............................................................…1 23 Shandong Province 山东省.............................................. 377 Introduction 概述 .........................................................…4 24 Shanghai Municipality 上海市 .......................................... 407 Laogai Terms and Abbreviations 25 Shanxi Province 山西省 ................................................... 423 劳改单位及缩写............................................................28 26 Sichuan Province 四川省 ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Profit Or Purpose Legal and Ethical Issues for U.S
    HONORS CAPSTONE: FALL 2010 Profit or Purpose Legal and Ethical Issues for U.S. IT Companies in China Caleb Skeath 12/11/2010 Advisor: Professor Michael Mass General University Honors Skeath 2 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Part I: Overview of Chinese Censorship ................................................................................................... 5 Content Censorship via Hardware ............................................................................................................ 6 Content Censorship via Software .............................................................................................................. 8 Content Censorship at the ISP/ICP Level ................................................................................................. 9 Censorship of Online Communications (Email and Chat/IM) ................................................................ 12 Methods of Circumventing Censorship Efforts ...................................................................................... 13 Part II: Case Studies: Yahoo! Inc. ........................................................................................................... 14 Part II: Case Studies: Microsoft Inc. ...................................................................................................... 20 Part II: Google Inc. ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]