One Problem Led to Another, and the Apache Helicopters Never Flew a Combat Mission in Kosovo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

One problem led to another, and the Apache helicopters never flew a combat mission in Kosovo. Task Force Hawk By Benjamin S. Lambeth An Army AH-64 Apache in Albania. At right, a line of Apaches in Bosnia. nly days after Operation Allied dorse the deployment. That approval Force commenced in March finally came on Day 12 of Allied 1999, Gen. Wesley K. Clark, Force. The US Defense Department NATO’s Supreme Allied Com- at first indicated that it would take omander Europe, asked the up to 10 days to deploy the package. United States Army to deploy In the end, it took 17 days just to a contingent of its AH-64 Apache field the first battalion of Apaches, attack helicopters to the combat zone which arrived in Albania on April to provide a better close-in capabil- 21. ity against enemy tanks and armored At first glance, the idea of using personnel carriers than that offered Apaches to reinforce NATO’s fixed- by fixed-wing fighters, which re- wing aircraft seemed entirely appro- mained restricted to operating at me- priate, considering that the AH-64 dium altitudes as a general rule. Clark had been acquired by the Army ex- initially had hoped to deploy this pressly to engage and destroy enemy force to Macedonia, where the roads armor. As Pentagon spokesman Ken- and airfields were better and the ter- neth Bacon put it in announcing the rain was less challenging. The Mace- deployment, they would offer NATO donian government, however, de- “the type of tank-killing capability clined to grant permission because it that the bad weather has denied us. It was already swamped by the flood will give us the capability to get up of Kosovar refugees, so Albania was close and personal to the Milosevic sought instead as the best available armor units units in Kosovo.” In a alternative. normal weapons load, the Apache Within four hours, NATO ap- mounts up to 16 Hellfire anti-tank proved Clark’s request. It took more missiles, 76 folding-fin anti-person- than a week, however, for the US nel rockets, and 1,200 rounds of 30 and Albanian governments to en- mm armor-piercing ammunition. 78 AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2002 US Army photo by Spc. Johnny H. Vazquez With that armament, it gained de- fenses, military engineers, and head- ing vehicles; an armor company with served distinction by destroying more quarters overhead. As the core of 15 M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks; than 500 Iraqi armored vehicles dur- this larger force complement, now a howitzer battery with eight 155 ing Operation Desert Storm. Yet in designated Task Force Hawk, the mm artillery pieces; a construction Desert Storm, the Apaches had de- Apaches were drawn from the Army’s engineer company; a short-range air ployed as an organic component of 11th Aviation Brigade stationed at defense battery with eight more Brad- two fully fielded US Army corps. In Illesheim, Germany. The deployment ley armored fighting vehicles armed this case, the Army was being asked package included, however, not only with Stinger infrared surface-to-air by SACEUR to cobble together an the two battalions of AH-64s but missiles; a smoke generator platoon; ad hoc task force designed to oper- also 26 UH-60L Black Hawk and a brigade headquarters complement; ate essentially on its own, without CH-47D Chinook helicopters from and diverse other elements. In all, to the backstopping support of a fielded the 12th Aviation Regiment at Wies- backstop the deployment of 24 at- US ground combat presence in the baden, Germany. Additional assets tack helicopters to Albania, Task theater. The Army is not configured whose deployment was deemed es- Force Hawk ended up being accom- to undertake such ad hoc deploy- sential for supporting the Apaches panied by a support train of no fewer ments, and its units do not train for included a light infantry company; a than 5,350 Army personnel. them. Instead, an Apache battalion Multiple Launch Rocket System pla- To be sure, there was a legitimate normally deploys only as a part of a toon with three MLRS vehicles; a force-protection rationale behind this larger Army division or corps, with high-mobility multipurpose wheeled accompanying train of equipment and all of the latter’s organically attached vehicle (humvee) anti-tank company personnel. Unlike the Marines, who elements. equipped with 38 armed utility ve- deployed 24 F/A-18D fighters to hicles; a military intelligence pla- Hungary only a few weeks thereaf- Apaches, and More toon; a military police platoon; and a ter and had them flying combat mis- Accordingly, the Army was driven combat service support team. The sions within days with nothing even by its own standard operating proce- Army further determined a need for approaching Hawk’s overhead and dures to supplement the two Apache its Apaches to be accompanied by a support baggage, Army planners had battalions with a heavy additional mechanized infantry company equip- to be concerned about the inherent contingent of ground forces, air de- ped with 14 Bradley armored fight- risks of deploying a comparable num- AIR FORCE Magazine / February 2002 79 ber of Apaches on terrain that was way and ramp specifications to ac- tion concluded that the first accident not that of a NATO ally, that lacked commodate the more capacious C-5.) had been caused by the pilot’s hav- any semblance of a friendly ground In the end, it took more than 500 C- ing mistakenly landed short of his force presence, and that could easily 17 sorties, moving some 22,000 short intended touchdown point. The sec- have invited a VJ (for Vojska Jugo- tons in all, to transfer Hawk in its ond was attributed to an apparent slavskaya, the Serb army) cross-bor- entirety. Commenting later on the failure of the tail rotor, considering der attack in the absence of a US deployment, one Army officer com- that the aircraft had been observed ground force sufficient to render that plained that the Army is “still orga- to enter a rapid uncontrolled spiral an unacceptable gamble for VJ com- nized to fight in the Fulda Gap.” during the last moments before its manders. Even the outgoing Army Chief of impact with the ground. That said, it bears noting that the Staff, Gen. Dennis J. Reimer, admit- threat of Serbian forces coming ted in an internal memo to senior Rising Costs across the Albanian border did not Army staff officers once the deploy- As of May 31, the cost of the appear to be a matter of great con- ment package had finally been as- Task Force Hawk deployment had cern to anyone in the Allied Force sembled in theater that the manifold reached $254 million, much of that command hierarchy before the ar- problems encountered by Hawk had constituting the expense for the rival of Task Force Hawk, even underscored a “need for more adap- hundreds of C-17 sorties that had though there were US troops already tive force packaging methodology.” been needed to haul all the equip- on the ground. The troops, who were In all events, 23 Apaches with their ment from Germany to Albania, not provided with any comparable attached equipment and personnel plus the additional costs of build- force protection package, were in arrived in Albania in late April. (The ing base camps and port services Albania as a part of Joint Task Force 24th Apache had developed hydrau- and conducting mission rehearsals. Shining Hope, the Albanian refugee lic trouble en route and remained on Yet despite SACEUR’s intentions relief effort. the ground in Italy.) No sooner had to the contrary, the Apaches flew not the Army declared all but one of the a single combat mission during the Baggage Problems aircraft ready for combat on April entire remainder of Operation Al- As one might have expected with 26 when, only hours later, one crashed lied Force. The reason given by then– that much additional equipment and at the Tirana airfield in full view of JCS Chairman Army Gen. Henry H. personnel, however, the Apache de- reporters who had been authorized Shelton was that Serb air defenses in ployment soon encountered the pre- to televise the flight. Neither crew Kosovo, although noticeably de- dictable consequences of the Army’s member was injured, but the acci- graded by early May, remained ef- decision to accompany the AH-64s dent made for an inauspicious start fective enough to warrant keeping with such a surfeit of arguably un- for the widely touted deployment. the Apaches out of action until sup- necessary extra baggage. It was at Less than two weeks later, on May 5, pression of enemy air defenses op- first estimated that 200 USAF C-17 a second accident occurred, this time erations had “reduced the risk to the transport sorties would be needed to killing both crew members during a very minimum.” airlift the assorted support elements night training mission some 46 miles In a final coda to the Army’s with which the Apaches had been north of Tirana. The aircraft was plagued Task Force Hawk experi- burdened. (The airport at Tirana, carrying a full load of weapons and ence, Shelton conceded later in a Albania, lacked the required taxi- extra fuel. A subsequent investiga- written response to questions from the Senate Armed Services Commit- tee that “the anticipated benefit of employing the Apaches against dis- persed forces in a high-threat envi- ronment did not outweigh the risk to our pilots.” Shelton added that by the time the Apache deployment had reached the point where it was ready to engage in combat, VJ ground for- USAF photo by SrA.
Recommended publications
  • 1) ATQ Summer 2004

    1) ATQ Summer 2004

    CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments......................................................................... 2 President’s Message ............................................................................... 3 AIRLIFT TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 12 • Number 3 • Summer 2004 Secretary’s Notes ................................................................................... 3 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, Col. Barry F. Creighton, USAF (Ret.), Secretary, Association Round-Up .......................................................................... 4 1708 Cavelletti Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23454. (757) 838-3037. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $30.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. Cover Story The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the AMC: 12 Years of Excellence ......................................................... 6-17 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $30 annually A New Era in American Air Power Began on 1 June 1992 or $85 for three years. Full-time student membership is $10 per year. Life membership is $400. Corporate membership includes five individual memberships and is $1200 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Departments Airlift/Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published for the use of the officers,
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For

    Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For

    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
  • Army Press January 2017 Blythe

    Army Press January 2017 Blythe

    Pfc. Brandie Leon, 4th Infantry Division, holds security while on patrol in a local neighborhood to help maintain peace after recent attacks on mosques in the area, East Baghdad, Iraq, 3 March 2006. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Jason Ragucci, U.S. Army) III Corps during the Surge: A Study in Operational Art Maj. Wilson C. Blythe Jr., U.S. Army he role of Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno’s III (MNF–I) while using tactical actions within Iraq in an Corps as Multinational Corps–Iraq (MNC–I) illustrative manner. As a result, the campaign waged by has failed to receive sufficient attention from III Corps, the operational headquarters, is overlooked Tstudies of the 2007 surge in Iraq. By far the most in this key work. comprehensive account of the 2007–2008 campaign The III Corps campaign is also neglected in other is found in Michael Gordon and Lt. Gen. Bernard prominent works on the topic. In The Gamble: General Trainor’s The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama, which fo- 2006-2008, Thomas Ricks emphasizes the same levels cuses on the formulation and execution of strategy and as Gordon and Trainor. However, while Ricks plac- policy.1 It frequently moves between Washington D.C., es a greater emphasis on the role of III Corps than is U.S Central Command, and Multinational Force–Iraq found in other accounts, he fails to offer a thorough 2 13 January 2017 Army Press Online Journal 17-1 III Corps during the Surge examination of the operational campaign waged by III creating room for political progress such as the February 2 Corps.
  • Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo

    Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo

    Theater Airlift Lessons from Kosovo by Lt Col Rowayne A. Schatz, USAF This basic doctrine presents the guiding principles of our Service and our view of the opportunities of the future… As airmen, we must understand these ideas, we must cultivate them and, importantly, we must debate and refine these ideas for the future.1 General Michael E. Ryan Chief of Staff, USAF Operation Allied Force, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military operation to compel Serbia to cease hostilities against ethnic Albanians in Kosovo and allow a peacekeeping presence on the ground, was the first major war in history fought exclusively with air power. NATO air forces flew over 38,000 sorties from 24 March through 9 June 1999 to allow NATO to achieve its political objectives in Kosovo.2 Although you may not have heard or read much about them, air mobility forces were key to the success of the air war over Serbia. The air mobility team moved enough airmen and equipment to increase the number of air expeditionary wings in Europe from three to ten, provided aid directly to thousands of Kosovar refugees, and deployed a large US Army contingent to Albania—all at the same time. In the words of Colonel Scott Gray, the USAFE Assistant Director of Operations during Operation Allied Force, "This was a phenomenal success, enabling the forces which forced Milosevic to back down while sustaining the refugees he created until they were able to go home.3 According to AFDD1, "Air and space doctrine is an accumulation of knowledge gained primarily from the study and analysis of experience, which may include actual combat or contingency operations as well as equipment tests or exercises."4 I am a firm believer that doctrine is key to warfighting.
  • The Demand for Responsiveness in Past U.S. Military Operations for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    The Demand for Responsiveness in Past U.S. Military Operations for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    C O R P O R A T I O N STACIE L. PETTYJOHN The Demand for Responsiveness in Past U.S. Military Operations For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4280 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0657-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Air Force/Airman 1st Class Gerald R. Willis. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Department of Defense (DoD) is entering a period of great power competition at the same time that it is facing a difficult budget environment.
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)

    US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)

    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
  • Disjointed War: Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999

    Disjointed War: Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999

    Disjointed War Military Operations in Kosovo, 1999 Bruce R. Nardulli, Walter L. Perry, Bruce Pirnie John Gordon IV, John G. McGinn Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Arroyo Center The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under contract number DASW01-01-C-0003. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Disjointed war : military operations in Kosovo, 1999 / Bruce R. Nardulli ... [et al.]. p. cm. “MR-1406.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3096-5 1. Kosovo (Serbia)—History—Civil War, 1998—Campaigns. 2. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Armed Forces—Yugoslavia. I. Nardulli, Bruce R. DR2087.5 .D57 2002 949.703—dc21 2002024817 Cover photos courtesy of U.S. Air Force Link (B2) at www.af.mil, and NATO Media Library (Round table Meeting) at www.nato.int. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE Following the 1999 Kosovo conflict, the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to prepare an authoritative and detailed account of military operations with a focus on ground operations, especially Task Force Hawk.
  • The 1990S: Trouble in the Balkans 117

    The 1990S: Trouble in the Balkans 117

    The 1990s: Trouble in the Balkans 117 Chapter Five The 1990s: Trouble in the Balkans A CHANGING WORLD The end of the Cold War brought profound changes to international relations. During the Cold War, both the Soviets and the West had supported client states around the globe, sometimes suppressing internal dissent in those countries to prop up friendly regimes. Now that the Cold War’s strategic rationales had dwindled away, dissent could reappear, sometimes turning into conflict. Coun- tries and alliances either adapted to the changed situation or disappeared. The US Army was also facing major changes, most notably, a substantial re- duction in size. With fewer threats on the horizon, neither the public nor poli- ticians were willing to spend as much money on the military. The American public expected a “peace dividend” of lower defense spending, and the political question shifted from whether candidates were hawkish about defense to how they would spend the “dividend.” Some favored spending the money on various programs, others preferred tax cuts. Meanwhile, the active duty Army fell by 32%, from 772,000 to 529,000. A less obvious change for the Army was a shift in the locations where it might see combat. Since Vietnam, the Army’s major emphasis had been preparing to fight a Soviet/Warsaw Pact attack in Europe. Now that the Soviet threat was over and an invasion of Germany unlikely, major reductions of American forces in Europe, especially in Germany, were planned. Remaining troops had to be ready to deploy elsewhere, wherever the trouble was. Germany would be a starting point, not the scene of action.
  • Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom

    Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom

    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Sustainment of Army Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom Battlefield Logistics and Effects on Operations Eric Peltz, John M. Halliday, Marc L. Robbins, Kenneth J. Girardini Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No.
  • V Corps Inactivates After Nearly a Century of Service to U.S. Army

    V Corps Inactivates After Nearly a Century of Service to U.S. Army

    V Corps inactivates after nearly a century of service to U.S. Army June 12, 2013 By Sgt. Daniel Cole, U.S. Army Europe Public Affairs Tweet . V Corps commander Lt. Gen. James L. Terry (left) and corps Command Sgt. Maj. William Johnson place a Meritorious Unit Commendation streamer on the corps colors during the unit's inactivation ceremony at Schloss Biebrich in Wiesbaden, Germany, June 12. (Photo by Karl Weisel) RELATED ITEMS: Social Media - More images in U.S. Army Garrison Wiesbaden's Flickr photostream Facebook WIESBADEN, Germany –- V Corps marked its inactivation after nearly a century of prestigious service to the U.S. Army with a ceremony at Wiesbaden’s Schloss Biebrich, Twitter June 12. Flickr The ceremony served to inactivate V Corps and to give a final salute to the unit for YouTube everything it has accomplished in its 95-year history. It was also a time to present two campaign steamers to the corps for its service. A Meritorious Unit Commendation streamer was presented for the unit’s most recent deployment serving as the of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force Joint Command (IJC) in Afghanistan. The second streamer, the Superior Army Unit Award, honors the unit for its efforts during the reconstitution, modularization and relocation of V Corps to Wiesbaden from Heidelberg. During the ceremony V Corps commander Lt. Gen. James L. Terry and corps Command Sgt. Maj. William Johnson placed the streamers on the unit’s colors and cased the banner for inactivation. Terry spoke about how the corps has provided USAREUR and the U.S.
  • V Corps Public Affairs News Release

    V Corps Public Affairs News Release

    V Corps Public Affairs News Release For more information, contact: Maj. Rich Spiegel/Hilde Patton DSN 314.370.5812/16 Civ. 49(0)6221.57.5812/16 Email: Richard [email protected] Email: [email protected] For Immediate Release: V Corps Commander nominated for Pentagon position Heidelberg, Germany (July 26, 2007) -- Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates announced yesterday that the President has nominated Lt. Gen. James D. Thurman, commander of V Corps here, to become the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C. The nomination has to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. General Thurman has been commander of V Corps since January this year. V Corps serves the U.S. European Command and is the United States Army's only forward-deployed corps headquarters. With more than 25,000 soldiers and civilians, V Corps is the Army's contingency force for European and Central Command missions and stands ready to deploy from its bases in Europe to Central and Eastern Europe, the Mediterranean, Africa, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. During his command, Thurman used his experience gained during command in Iraq to improve readiness and training of deploying units. He was also instrumental in starting the transformation of the current military structures to create an operational corps-level joint deployable headquarters. If confirmed by the Senate, Thurman will be leaving Germany to head the Army G-3/5/7 which has the Army General Staff responsibility for strategy formulation, overall force development, individual and unit training policy, the functional aspects of strategic and tactical command and control systems, nuclear and chemical matters, and establishing requirements and priorities for the employment and sustenance of Army forces.
  • Cultural Resource Survey of Cold War Properties Fort Bragg, North Carolina

    Cultural Resource Survey of Cold War Properties Fort Bragg, North Carolina

    CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY OF COLD WAR PROPERTIES FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA AUGUST, 2005 Report Prepared By Thomason and Associates Preservation Planners P.O. Box 121225 Nashville, TN 37212 Tel and Fax: 615-385-4960 e-mail: [email protected] Report Prepared For the US Corps of Engineers, Savannah, Georgia and the Cultural Resources Management Program, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Principal Investigator, Philip Thomason ──────────────────────── TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures....................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. iv I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Cold War Context of Fort Bragg ...................................................................................... 8 III. The Cold War and National Register Eligibility ................................................................... 36 IV. Fort Bragg’s Cold War-Era National Register Eligible Properties ....................................... 48 V. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 66 VI. Bibliography ..........................................................................................................................