Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Table of Contents Acknowledgments vii List of Abbreviations ix Introduction 1 Varieties of Anti-Nazi Resistance 4 Sources of Resistance: Jewish, Youth, Leftist Movements 6 Chapter 1: Assimilation and Alienation: The Origins and Growth of German-Jewish Youth Movements 11 The Jewish Experience in Germany 12 Assimilation: An Uneasy Balance 14 German and German-Jewish Youth Groups, 1900-1933 15 German-Jewish Youth Groups, 1933-1939 19 Socialism and Jewish Youth Politics 22 Chapter 2: Neither Hitler Nor Stalin: Resistance by Dissident Communists and Left-Wing Socialists 27 End of Weimar Democracy and the Emergence of Left Splinter Groups 33 The “Org” (Neu Beginnen) 34 Decline and Demise of the Org 40 The Left Opposition in Berlin 41 Clandestine Activities of the Left Oppositionists 44 Jews in Socialism’s Left Wing 47 Chapter 3: Repression and Revival: Contradictions of the Communist-led Resistance in Berlin 57 Initial Setbacks and Underground Organization 58 Stalin-Hitler Treaty: Disorientation and Accommodation 61 German Marxism and the “Jewish Question” 63 Jews in Berlin’s Communist-led Resistance 67 Communist Politics: Weapon or Obstacle? 73 vi Jewish, Leftist, and Youth Dissidence in Nazi Germany Chapter 4: “Thinking for Themselves”: The Herbert Baum Groups 81 Herbert Baum: Origins and Influences 83 Baum and the Structure of His Groups, 1933-1942 86 Toward Anti-Nazi Action 91 Chapter 5: “We Have Gone on the Offensive”: Education and Other Subversive Activities Under Dictatorship 95 Persecution and Perseverance 96 Heimabende: Underground Self-Education 98 The Impact of Kristallnacht and the Non-Aggression Pact 104 New Opportunities, New Dangers 108 “We have Gone on the Offensive” 110 The Final Period of the Baum Groups 114 The Noose Tightens 116 Chapter 6: The “Soviet Paradise” and the Demise of the Baum Groups 125 Countering Goebbels’ Exhibit: Debates and Motives 126 The Attack on the “Soviet Paradise” 129 Arrests, Reprisals, Recriminations 131 Were They Betrayed? 135 Epilogue: Escape and Reunion 137 Chapter 7: The Baum Groups Remembered: Communist Martyrs or Jewish Resistance Fighters? 145 Official Memory in the German Democratic Republic 146 Antisemitic Campaigns in East Germany 150 Baum as East German Hero 152 Baum Veterans Remember Their Life in the Resistance 154 Other Baum Veterans 161 Replacing a Lost German Identity 164 Chapter 8: Jewish, Leftist, and Youth Resistance in Its Time and Beyond 177 Jewish Resistance and Memory 180 Legacies 182 Bibliography 187 Index 197 Acknowledgments Numerous colleagues and mentors have enriched this manuscript with their insightful critiques, but space allows me to single out only a handful of them: Konrad Jarausch, whose patience, wisdom, and trust were indispensable; David Carlson, who subjected most of these chapters to a challenging and incisive “ruthless criticism of everything existing,” as we used to say; Cora Granata, whose comments were especially helpful on Chapter Seven; and Chris Hamner and Sharon Kowalsky. I also wish to express my gratitude to several institutions and their respective staffs for supporting my research, travel, and writing: The Berlin Program for Advanced German and European Studies, which provided a fellowship that allowed me to research this book; the Center for European Studies at the University of North Carolina; and UNC’s Department of History. I profited greatly from the resources of the following archives and institutions: the Bundesarchiv in Lichterfelde, Berlin; the BA Zwischenarchiv at Dahlwitz-Hoppegarten; the Yad Vashem Archives; the Gedenkstätte deutscher Widerstand and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation in Berlin; the Centre de Documentation Juive Contemporaine in Paris; Amsterdam’s International Institute of Social Research; and the Wiener Library in London. I would also like to acknowledge the encouragement and guidance I have received from past professors, particularly Rennie Brantz, Christopher Browning, Don Reid, Jay Smith, and Jim Winders. Some of the most valuable and stimulating exchanges I’ve had in recent years have been with friends who happen to reside outside the world of higher education, so thanks also to Will, Tim, Edwin, Andy, and Martin. Michael Kreutzer was very generous in sharing his expertise at an early stage of my research. I would not presume to match the work of the leading authorities on the Baum groups—Eric Brothers and Regina Scheer, in addition to Michael—but I hope my chapters on Baum complement their efforts in some small way. I also owe a large debt to the veterans of the anti-Nazi underground who shared their viii Jewish, Leftist, and Youth Dissidence in Nazi Germany experiences with me. Thanks in particular to Gerhard Zadek, who up until his passing in October 2005 dedicated great time and energy to the memorialization of the resistance and of pre-1933 German-Jewish life. Above all I thank my parents, who instilled in me a love not only for education but also for justice, and my wife, Marty—also my dearest friend and most valued compañera, to whom this book is dedicated. She knows I can’t express here how much she’s meant to me throughout this process. John Cox April 2009 Abbreviations BA Bundesarchiv Lichterfelde, Berlin BAZw Bundesarchiv Zwischenarchiv, Dahlwitz-Hoppegarten, Berlin CV Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens (Central Union of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith) DJJG Deutsch-Jüdische Jugendgemeinschaft (German-Jewish Youth Society) GDR German Democratic Republic (East Germany) GdW Gedenkstätte deutscher Widerstand, Berlin (German Resistance Memorial Center) IfZ Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Munich (Institute for Contemporary History) KJVD Kommunistische Jugendverband Deutschlands (Communist Youth Association of Germany) KPD Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (Communist Party of Germany) SED Sozialistische Einheitspartei (Socialist Unity Party, East Germany’s Communist party) SPD Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (Social Democratic Party of Germany) Stasi Staatssicherheitsdienst (East German State Security Service) USPD Unabhängige Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany) YVA Yad Vashem archives, Jerusalem Introduction On May 8, 1942, the Sowjetparadies (the “Soviet Paradise”), an exhibition staged by Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels depicting the poverty and degradation of Russia under the “Jewish-Bolshevik” regime, opened with great fanfare in central Berlin’s Lustgarten square. Almost three years to the day before the real Red Army brought down the “thousand-year Reich,” a captured Soviet tank rumbled down the Unter den Linden boulevard to inaugurate the show. One newspaper predicted optimistically that it would be “the most successful political exhibition yet.... Several million people shall visit.”1 Not everyone was quite as enthusiastic. At approximately 8:00 p.m. on May 18, several explosives ignited around the periphery of the exhibition. Although fire trucks responded quickly, a portion of the installation burned that evening. “Again in our big cities a communist opposition…has established itself,” angrily wrote Goebbels in his diary the next day.2 Had the propaganda minister and his immediate supe- rior, Adolf Hitler, known the identity of the saboteurs at the time, they would undoubtedly have been even more enraged: This bold action was organized by young Jews, and, further, by German Jews who were members of far leftist organizations. In the very same location—the Lustgarten—four decades later, East Berlin’s city government unveiled a memorial to the Herbert Baum groups, a network of resisters that was coordinated by German- Jewish Communist Herbert Baum, who had personally led the sabo- tage of the “Soviet Paradise.” The organizers of the November 1981 event saw in the Baum groups a stirring example of Communist resis- tance to the Hitler regime, the continuous invocation of which was essential to the legitimacy of the East German state. An inscription on the square, granite memorial celebrated the “young Communist Her- bert Baum.” On the other side of the stone read the text: “Forever allied in friendship with the Soviet Union.” Two years later and only a few kilometers west of the Lustgarten, West German students campaigned to memorialize Herbert Baum on the campus of the Technical University of Berlin (TU). The Christian 2 Jewish, Leftist, and Youth Dissidence in Nazi Germany Democrats’ student organization vigorously fought the proposal, de- claring that “Herbert Baum fought a deeply inhuman system in order to establish a no less inhuman one.”3 The “Herbert Baum Building” would have been located on “June 17 Street,” which commemorates the 1953 workers’ uprising against the East German state—an event that the West German government never tired of citing to buttress its own narrative of Germany’s recent history.4 Weary of constant re- minders of Communist “totalitarianism”—and now enduring the second year of the Helmut Kohl government—some of TU’s leftist stu- dents wished to advance their own interpretation of Germany’s tumultuous twentieth century. How would Herbert Baum and his comrades have regarded all this? Probably in widely differing ways, reflecting the multiple identi- ties and political views that Baum’s network accommodated. Like many loose-knit circles of young dissidents, the Baum-organized groups were heterogeneous and should not be easily categorized. Al- though Baum was a committed member of the German Communist Party (KPD), his colleagues represented a variety of movements and influences
Recommended publications
  • Bibliographical Essay
    Bibliographical Essay Below is a working bibliography of the most important books and artides that have been particularly useful to the editors and that complement the essays contained in the volume. Since we focused on the structural, i. e., economic, dass, and power dimensions that largely led to the collapse of the Weimar Republic and the successful ascension to power of the Nazi party, most of the items listed reßect that ap- proach. Although not exhaustive, this list indudes some of the most significant works in the field and those which have shaped our thinking. For a discussion of the emergence of fascism and its relation to dass, economics, and political development, see: Nicos Poulantzas, Fascism and Dictatorship (London: NLB, 1974); Renzo De Felice, Fascism: An Informal Introduction to lts Theory and Practice (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1976); Stanley Payne, Fascism: Comparison and Definition (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1980); Stein Ugelvik Larsen, Bernt Hagtvet, Jan Petter Myklebust, eds., Who Were the Fascists: Social Roots of European Fascism (Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1980); Peter Stachura, ed., The Shaping of the Nazi State (London: Croom Helm, 1978); Walter Laqueur, Fascism: A Readers Guide (London: Wildwood House, 1976); Ernst Nolte, Three Faces of Fascism (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1965); Barrington Moore, Jr., Social Ori- gins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966); Eugen Weber, Varieties of Fascism (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1964); Francis L. Carsten, The Rise of Fascism (London: Batsford, 1967); John Weiss, The Fascist Tradition (New York: Harper & Row, 1967); Hans Rogger and Eugen Weber, eds., The European Right (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1965); George L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Hatred*
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HATRED* by Edward L. Glaeser October 26, 2004, Third Draft Abstract This paper develops a model of the interaction between the supply of hate-creating stories from politicians and the willingness of voters to listen to hatred. Hatred is fostered with stories of an out-group's crimes, but the impact of these stories comes from repetition not truth. Hate-creating stories are supplied by politicians when such actions help to discredit opponents whose policies benefit an out-group. Egalitarians foment hatred against rich minorities; opponents of redistribution build hatred against poor minorities. Hatred relies on people accepting, rather than investigating, hate-creating stories. Hatred declines when there is private incentive to learn the truth. Increased economic interactions with a minority group may provide that incentive. This framework is used to illuminate the evolution of anti-black hatred in the United States South, episodes of anti-Semitism in Europe, and the recent surge of anti-Americanism in the Arab world. * I am grateful to George Akerlof, Alberto Alesina, William Easterly, Lawrence Katz, David Laibson, Steven Levitt, George Loewenstein, Richard Posner, Jose Scheinkman, Jesse Shapiro and Andrei Shleifer for extremely helpful comments, and to the NSF for financial assistance. Giacomo Porzetto provided excellent research assistance. I am enormously indebted to Paul Romer, whose thinking, only some of which appears in Romer [1996], is the starting point for this paper. Naturally, I alone bear blame for my excesses and errors. I. Introduction From the Thirty Years’ War to the Holocaust to the contemporary wars in Rwanda and the Balkans, much of human misery is due to religious and ethnic conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Left's Views on Israel: from the Establishment of the Jewish State To
    ‘The Left’s Views on Israel: From the establishment of the Jewish state to the intifada’ Thesis submitted by June Edmunds for PhD examination at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 UMI Number: U615796 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615796 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F 7377 POLITI 58^S8i ABSTRACT The British left has confronted a dilemma in forming its attitude towards Israel in the postwar period. The establishment of the Jewish state seemed to force people on the left to choose between competing nationalisms - Israeli, Arab and later, Palestinian. Over time, a number of key developments sharpened the dilemma. My central focus is the evolution of thinking about Israel and the Middle East in the British Labour Party. I examine four critical periods: the creation of Israel in 1948; the Suez war in 1956; the Arab-Israeli war of 1967 and the 1980s, covering mainly the Israeli invasion of Lebanon but also the intifada. In each case, entrenched attitudes were called into question and longer-term shifts were triggered in the aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a New Political Dawn: the Cuban Revolution in the 1960S
    Notes 1 A New Political Dawn: The Cuban Revolution in the 1960s 1. For an outline of the events surrounding the Padilla Affair, see chapter two. 2. Kenner and Petras limited themselves to mentioning the enormous importance of a Cuban Revolution with which a great number of the North American New Left identified. They also dedicated their book to the Cuban and Vietnamese people for “giving North Americans the possibility of making a revolution” (1972: 5). 3. For an explanation of the term gauchiste and of its relevance to the New Left, see chapter six. 4. However, this consideration has been rather critical in the case of Minogue (1970). 5. The general consensus seems to be that, as the Revolution entered a period of rapid Sovietization following the failure of the ten million ton sugar harvest of 1970, Western intellectuals, who until then had showed support, sought to distance themselves from the Revolution. The single incident that seemingly sparked this reaction, in particular from some French intellectuals, was the Padilla Affair. 6. Here a clear distinction must be made mainly between the Communist Party of the pre-Revolutionary period, the Partido Socialista Popular (Popular Socialist Party) and the 26 July Movement (MR26). The former had a legacy of Popular Frontism, collaboration with Batista in the post- War period and a general distrust of “middle class adventurers” as it referred to the leadership of MR26 until 1958 (Karol, 1971: 150). The latter, led by Castro, had a radical though incoherently articulated ideo- logical basis. The process of unification of revolutionary organizations carried out between 1961 and 1965 did not completely obliterate the individuality of these competing discourses and it was in their struggle for supremacy that the New Left’s contribution was made.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Paediatric Treatment in the Reichsuniversität Straßburg (1941-1944) Aisling Shalvey
    History of paediatric treatment in the Reichsuniversität Straßburg (1941-1944) Aisling Shalvey To cite this version: Aisling Shalvey. History of paediatric treatment in the Reichsuniversität Straßburg (1941-1944). His- tory. Université de Strasbourg, 2021. English. NNT : 2021STRAG002. tel-03283700 HAL Id: tel-03283700 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03283700 Submitted on 12 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG ÉCOLE DOCTORALE 519 Sciences humaines et sociales – Perspectives européennes [ ARCHE ] THÈSE présentée par : Aisling SHALVEY soutenue le : 12 mars 2021 pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur de l’université de Strasbourg Discipline/ Spécialité : Histoire Contemporaine de la Médecine History of Paediatric Treatment in the Reichsuniversität Straßburg (1941-1944) THÈSE dirigée par : Professeur MAURER Catherine Directrice du thèse, Université de Strasbourg Professeur WEINDLING Paul Directeur du thèse, Oxford Brookes University RAPPORTEURS : Professeur VON BUELTZINGSLOEWEN Isabelle Professor, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Professeur ROELCKE Volker Professor, Justus-Liebig- Universität Gießen AUTRES MEMBRES DU JURY : Professeur BONAH Christian Professor, Université de Strasbourg 1 Do mo sheantuismitheoirí Le grá 2 Acknowledgements I am extraordinarily lucky to have so many people who have supported me throughout the process of writing my PhD thesis; too many people to list, so I will begin by saying thank you to everyone who has helped me along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky
    Hamburg University Press Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 3 Zum Gedenken an Peter Borowsky Hamburger Universitätsreden Neue Folge 3 Herausgeber: Der Präsident der Universität Hamburg ZUM GEDENKEN AN PETER BOROWSKY herausgegeben von Rainer Hering und Rainer Nicolaysen Hamburg University Press © 2003 Peter Borowsky INHALT 9 Zeittafel Peter Borowsky 15 Vorwort 17 TRAUERFEIER FRIEDHOF HAMBURG-NIENSTEDTEN, 20. OKTOBER 2000 19 Gertraud Gutzmann Nachdenken über Peter Borowsky 25 Rainer Nicolaysen Trauerrede für Peter Borowsky 31 GEDENKFEIER UNIVERSITÄT HAMBURG, 8. FEBRUAR 2001 33 Wilfried Hartmann Grußwort des Vizepräsidenten der Universität Hamburg 41 Barbara Vogel Rede auf der akademischen Gedenkfeier für Peter Borowsky 53 Rainer Hering Der Hochschullehrer Peter Borowsky 61 Klemens von Klemperer Anderer Widerstand – anderes Deutschland? Formen des Widerstands im „Dritten Reich“ – ein Überblick 93 GEDENKFEIER SMITH COLLEGE, 27. MÄRZ 2001 95 Joachim Stieber Peter Borowsky, Member of the Department of History in Recurring Visits 103 Hans Rudolf Vaget The Political Ramifications of Hitler’s Cult of Wagner 129 ANHANG 131 Bibliographie Peter Borowsky 139 Gedenkschrift für Peter Borowsky – Inhaltsübersicht 147 Rednerinnen und Redner 149 Impressum ZEITTAFEL Peter Borowsky 1938 Peter Borowsky wird am 3. Juni als Sohn von Margare- te und Kurt Borowsky, einem selbstständigen Einzel- handelskaufmann, in Angerburg/Ostpreußen geboren 1944 im Herbst Einschulung in Angerburg 1945 nach der Flucht aus Ostpreußen von Januar
    [Show full text]
  • Social Penetration and Police Action: Collaboration Structures in the Repertory of Gestapo Activities
    Social Penetration and Police Action: Collaboration Structures in the Repertory of Gestapo Activities KLAUS-MICHAEL MALLMANN* SUMMARY: The twentieth century was "short", running only from 1914 to 1990/ 1991. Even so, it will doubtless enter history as an unprecedented era of dictatorships. The question of how these totalitarian regimes functioned in practice, how and to what extent they were able to realize their power aspirations, has until now been answered empirically at most highly selectively. Extensive comparative research efforts will be required over the coming decades. The police as the key organization in the state monopoly of power is particularly important in this context, since like no other institution it operates at the interface of state and society. Using the example of the Gestapo's activities in the Third Reich, this article analyses collaboration structures between these two spheres, which made possible (either on a voluntary or coercive basis) a penetration of social contexts and hence police action even in shielded areas. It is my thesis that such exchange processes through unsolicited denunciation and informers with double identities will also have been decisive outside Germany in the tracking of dissident behaviour and the detection of conspiratorial practices. I do not think it is too far-fetched to say that the century which is about to end will go down in history as the era of dictatorships. But a social history of this state-legitimized and -executed terror, let alone an interna- tional comparison on a solid
    [Show full text]
  • List of Films Set in Berlin
    LisListt of ffilmsilms sesett in Berlin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is a list of films whose setting is Berlin, Germany. Contents 1 1920s 2 1930s 3 1940s 4 1950s 5 1960s 6 1970s The world city Berlin is setting and filming location of 7 1980s numerous movies since the beginnings of the silent film 8 1990s era. 9 2000s 10 2010s 11 See also 1920s 1922 Dr. Mabuse the Gambler ( ( Dr Dr.. Mabuse, dederr SpielSpieler er ), 1922 - first (silent) film about the character Doctor Mabuse from the novels of Norbert Jacques, by Fritz Lang. 1924 The Last Laugh ( ( Der Letzte Mann), 1924 - The aging doorman at a Berlin hotel is demoted to washroom attendant but gets the last laugh, by F.W. Murnau. 1925 Varieté ( (Variety), 1925 - Circus melodrama set in Berlin, with the circus scenes in the Berlin Wintergarten, by EwEwalaldd AnAndrédré DDuupontpont.. Slums of Berlin ( ( Di Diee Verrufenen), 1925 - an engineer in Berlin is released from prison, but his father throws him out, his fiancée left him and there is no chance to find work. Directed by Gerhard Lamprecht. 1926 Di Diee letzte DrDroschkeoschke vvonon BeBerlirlinn, 1926 - showing the life of an old coachman in Berlin still driving the droshky during the time when the automobile arises. Directed by Carl Boese. 1927 Ber Berlin:lin: Symphony of a GGreatreat City ( ( Ber Berlin:lin: DiDiee Sinfonie der GroßsGroßstadt tadt ), 1927 - Expressionist documentary film of 1920s Berlin by Walter Ruttmann. Metropolis, 1927 - Berlin-inspired futuristic classic by Fritz Lang. 1928 Refuge ( ( Zuflucht ), 1928 - a lonely and tired man comes home after several years abroad, lives with a market-woman in Berlin and starts working for the Berlin U-Bahn.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Landau 1 (1903-1937)
    KURT LANDAU 1 (1903-1937) Kurt Landau nacque a Vienna il 29 gennaio 1903 da una famiglia ebrea agiata. A 18 anni, nel 1921, aderì al Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ, Partito comunista austriaco) e, un anno dopo, divenne responsabile di sezione del quartiere viennese di Währing. Agli inizi del 1923 criticò duramente la parola d’ordine del «governo operaio» adottata nel novembre- dicembre 1922 dal IV Congresso Mondiale della Terza Internazionale Comunista (Komin- tern). Egli respinse la possibilità di formare dei governi di coalizione con i socialdemocratici, in quanto tale posizione costituiva per lui una revisione della teoria marxista dello Stato. Il suo atteggiamento lo collocò in tal modo su posizioni «ultrasinistre» simili a quelle di Ama- deo Bordiga. Nominato capo del dipartimento di agitazione e propaganda del Comitato Cen- trale del KPÖ e responsabile delle pagine culturali dell’organo del partito Die Rote Fahne (La Bandiera Rossa), assunse la difesa di Trotsky allorché la direzione del KPÖ mise in atto la campagna antitrotskista nel quadro della cosiddetta «bolscevizzazione». 1 Pubblichiamo di seguito la traduzione in lingua italiana della lunga nota biografica – che nella presente ver- sione è stata riveduta e ampliata, soprattutto grazie ad alcune indicazioni gentilmente fornite da Agustín Guilla- món – redatta in francese da Paolo Casciola e originariamente pubblicata in forma anonima sotto il titolo «En guise d’introduction: Kurt Landau (1903-1937)» nel reprint dell’opuscolo dello stesso Landau, La guerre civile en Autriche (1934), Quaderni Pietro Tresso, n. 67, dicembre 2008, pp. 3-7. Per la sua stesura l’autore si è basato principalmente sulla grande biografia di Landau scritta da Hans Schafranek, Das kurze Leben des Kurt Landau.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical and Comparative Analysis of Organisational Forms of Selected Marxist Parties, in Theory and in Practice, with Special Reference to the Last Half Century
    Rahimi, M. (2009) A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/688/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] A critical and comparative analysis of organisational forms of selected Marxist parties, in theory and in practice, with special reference to the last half century Mohammad Rahimi, BA, MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Centre for the Study of Socialist Theory and Movement Faculty of Law, Business and Social Science University of Glasgow September 2008 The diversity of the proletariat during the final two decades of the 20 th century reached a point where traditional socialist and communist parties could not represent all sections of the working class. Moreover, the development of social movements other than the working class after the 1960s further sidelined traditional parties. The anti-capitalist movements in the 1970s and 1980s were looking for new political formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Appeal TROTSKY’S MONUMENT Official Weekly Organ of the Socialist Workers Party, Section of the Fourth International
    Trotsky’s Final Message: Go Forward ! SOCIALISM WILL BE Socialist Appeal TROTSKY’S MONUMENT Official Weekly Organ of the Socialist Workers Party, Section of the Fourth International VOL. IV— No. 34. NEW YORK, N. Y„ SATURDAY, AUGUST 24, 1940 FIVE (5) CENTS WE BRAND STALIN AS THE MURDERER OF TROTSKY Trotsky’s Fight Goes On Under The Banner Of The Fourth International Death Follows Leon Trotsky 1870-1040 Fight Now As Never Brutal Attack Before, Comrades! Leon Trotsky, co-leader with Lenin of the Russian Revolution, died in Mexico City Statement O f The National Committee on August 21 at 7 :30 P. M., victim of a bru­ Leon Trotsky, organizer of the Russian genius are preserved in his writings. They con­ tal assault by a GPU assassin. Revolution and its true representative, has stitute both a faultless analysis of the decay' He fought for life for 26 hours after finally been done to death by Stalin, the be­ of capitalism and a clear program of struggle Stalin's hired murderer had driven a pickaxe trayer of the Revolution and the mass mur­ for the socialist future of humanity. derer of the whale heroic generation that Armed with these weapons the oppressed into his brain. made it. of all the world w ill arise out of the bloody It was his last battle. Trotsky was murdered in cold blood by welter of the present society and fight their But he did not surrender until he had an agent of the Kremlin-Borgia. W ith his last way to freedom. They have been deprived of indicted the monster in the Kremlin as the words Trotsky accused Stalin of the crime, thp physical presence of Trotsky.
    [Show full text]
  • When and Why Socialism in the Soviet Union Failed
    Does Socialism Have a Future? Volume 1 When and Why Socialism in the Soviet Union Failed Translated into English by George Gruenthal Published by: Red Star Publishers P.O. Box 1641 Manhattanville Sta. New York, NY 10027 www.RedStarPublishers.org Table of Contents Critical Comments on the Book ...........................................7 Note on the Translation ........................................................9 Preliminary Remark ...........................................................11 1. Some Observations by Eugen Varga .............................13 Huge Income Differentials .............................................14 Production Determines Consumption ............................15 Gossweiler and Holz Cover up the Class Interests ........17 Marxist Socialism ..........................................................18 Gossweiler and Holz: Fighters for the Survival of Revisionism....................................................................19 Stalin against the Pigs in the State’s Vegetable Garden 22 Varga on the Abolition of the Party Maximum .............23 Varga on Conditions during the War .............................24 Svetlana Alliluyeva: Stalin Was in Many Ways a Prisoner of the Relations ................................................26 Varga on Stalin ..............................................................28 2. From the October Revolution to Collectivization ..........30 The Chain of the Imperialist World System Breaks Where It Is Weakest .......................................................30
    [Show full text]