<<

Native or introduced? Fossil pollen and spores may say. An example from the Azores Islands

Jacqueline F.N. van Leeuwen1), Hanno Schäfer2) , W.O. van der Knaap¹), Tammy Rittenour3), Svante Björck3) & Brigitta Ammann1)

¹) University of Bern, Institute of Sciences, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland 2) University of Regensburg, Institute of , D-93040 Regensburg, Germany 3) University of Lund, GeoBiosphere Science Centre, Quaternary Sciences, Sölvegatan 12, SE- 223 62 Lund, Sweden Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary Aim: Among the various possible approaches to assess whether a species is native or introduced, the analysis of subfossil pollen and spores from natural archives is a valuable tool. Requirements include a sufficiently high taxonomic resolution of the pollen morphology, as well as sufficient temporal and spatial resolution. The aim of this study is to show the usefulness of this method in solving whether the taxon is native or introduced. Location: The results are derived from two islands of the Azores: Flores and Pico. Methods: Analysis of pollen and spores in lake sediments; radiocarbon dating of the studied sedi- ments. Results: kraussiana (Kunze) A. Braun has occurred on the Azores Islands at least for the last 6000 years. Main conclusions: Different authors had assigned three different types of status to Selaginella kraus- siana: native, introduced (invasive), or uncertain. High numbers of spores of this taxon were pre- sent in the sediment cores from the two studied lakes already several thousand years before the Portuguese discovery and the Flemish settlement in the 15th century. This proves that the species is native on the Azores Islands. Pollen and spore analysis can therefore contribute to historical bio- geography not only regarding questions about pre-Quaternary plate tectonics but also about early human impact. Key words: palynology, Holocene, .

1. Introduction warming may play a role, because it may Invading species are an increasing threat shift the climatic constraints of species. to many native floras and faunas (Wil- The causes of the high vulnerability of liamson 1996; http://www7.nationalaca- island floras and faunas are often discus- demies.org/usnc-diversitas/index.html), sed in the vast field of Island Biogeo- and small isolated areas such as oceanic graphy, in which data collection and hypo- islands seem to be especially vulnerable. thesis generation interact in a fascinating The causes for the increasing threat may way (e.g. Vitousek et al. 1995; Whittaker primarily come from increasing propagu- 1995, 1998). Six conditions (Cronk & Ful- le pressures due to human impacts, such ler 1995) may explain why oceanic islands as trans-continental travel and transport may be especially susceptible to invasions (either by ship or plane), but also global (“oceanic” here means mid-ocean, as op-

In: Nentwig, W. et al. (Eds.): Biological Invasions – From Ecology 27 to Control. NEOBIOTA 6 (2005): 27-34 J.F.N. van Leeuwen, H. Schäfer , W.O. van der Knaap, T. Rittenour, S. Björck & B. Ammann posed to continental shelf): 2. Material and methods 1) species poverty (because of great 2.1 Taxonomic and biogeographical distances from continents), background 2) evolution in isolation, Selaginella kraussiana (Selaginellaceae) is a 3) early European colonisation, heterosporous related to the 4) small spatial scales, clubmosses and has characteristic reticulate, 5) crossroads of international trade, and narrowly winged megaspores (c. 750 µm) µ 6) ecological release (alien species may and echinate (26-32 m) arrive without natural pests). with bases of spines joined to form rid- ges. It was described as kraussi- To collect reliable data on invasions, anum by the German botanist G. Kunze in the first step is to clarify which species are 1844 on the basis of a specimen collected native and which are not, and if not, by C. von Krauss 1839 in Natal, South when were they introduced. The most (Kunze 1844). It was later transfer- important criteria were listed by Webb red to the Selaginella (Braun 1860) (1985): fossil evidence, historical eviden- and reported as native throughout the ce, habitat, geographical distribution, ease African continent from the Cape to of naturalisation elsewhere, genetic diver- Sudan and Ethiopia, and from Sierra sity, reproductive pattern, and supposed Leone to Kenya and Mozambique (e.g. means of introduction. These criteria Hassler & Swale 2002). It is widely plan- were used by one of us in an attempt to ted as an ornamental, certainly the most analyse the flora of the Azores (Schäfer common Selaginella in cultivation world- 2003). An approach combining phytoso- wide, and it has been reported as an esca- ciological, ecological, phytogeographical, ped, naturalised, or invasive species from and historical data was recently presented the Neotropics (Brazil, Panama, Jamaica, by Decocq et al. (2004). The use of fossil Hawai’i), the southern USA (California, pollen to answer status questions has Alabama, Georgia, the Carolinas), South been criticised because the taxa are usual- , New Zealand, and several W- ly identifiable only to genus level, and European countries (Portugal, Spain, doubts about long-range transport remain Great Britain, France, Belgium) (e.g. (Webb 1985). Wilson 1996). It is common on the Cana- Here we show that under certain con- ries, Madeira, and all islands of the ditions pollen and spores in lake sedi- Azores (Schäfer 2003) but its status in the ments can be very useful to clarify status middle-Atlantic islands is controversial problems. As an example we discuss the (see Tab. 1). It cannot be a Tertiary relict species Selaginella kraussiana (Kunze) A. because the Azorean islands are too Braun on the oceanic Azores archipelago, young: the oldest rocks are c. 5 million to which different authors assigned three years old (Féraud et al. 1980). different types of status: native, introdu- ced (invasive), or uncertain (see Table 1). 2.2 Palaeoecology Palynology in lake sediments provides a datable record of its spores. Presence or We studied sites on two different islands absence of the plant before the first of the Azores. Flores is the westernmost discovery and settlement of the Azores in island, and like all Azorean islands of vol- the late 15th century can thus be assessed. canic origin. It is situated on the Ameri-

28 Native or introduced?

Table 1: and biogeography of Selaginella kraussiana and S. azorica.

Literature Selaginella kraussiana (G. Kunze) A. Braun S. azorica Baker Seubert & Hochstetter Native (as Lycopodium denticulatum)– 1843; Watson 1844; Seubert 1844 Drouet 1866 Native (as )– Watson 1870 Native; this species has always passed (..) for – Lycopodium (Selaginella) denticulatum (..) Those reserved for my herbarium belong to Kraussiana (..) I assume this to be equally true also of the Selaginella recorded as denticulata in the works by Seubert and Drouet. Baker 1883 & 1884 Cape Colony, Natal, Fernando Po, Cameroon Described as new endemic of Mountains, Azores, Madeira, and reported also the Azores (based on single, from Sicily. ‘S. Brownii Hort. Stansfield’ is a sterile specimen collected by dwarf variety from the Azores. Arruda Furtado in the “mountains of the Azores”) Trelease 1897 Native,common Endemic to the Azores, rare or local (not seen) Gandoger 1899 Endemic (or almost endemic) to the Azores Endemic (or almost endemic) to the Azores Tutin & Warburg 1932 Not mentioned Endemic to the Azores (Faial, Pico) Palhinha 1943 Native; Azorean and African specimens identical Endemic to the Azores (not seen) Dansereau 1961 Macaronesian-African Endemic to the Azores (not seen) Palhinha 1966 Subspontaneous, native in tropical and S Africa; Synonymous to S. kraussiana commonly cultivated in continental Portugal Ward 1970 Native; ubiquitous as extensive mats in woods, Synonymous to S. kraussiana? fields, and calderas more work is needed Franco 1971 Introduced to the Azores and to Portugal, Not mentioned native in tropical and South Africa Sjögren 1973 Now frequent in most plant communities on Not mentioned all islands; probably extension of the distribution during the last 100 years Nogueira 1980 Spores or fragments of this species could have Synonymous to S. kraussiana been brought to the Azores together with seeds or ornamental imported from S Africa, ... Today it is perfectly adapted,... and almost showing characters of native status. Dostal 1984 Native on the Azores (and Central and Southern Synonymous to S. kraussiana Africa), in gardens since 1800, often escaped and found in Belgium and Northern Italy Valentine & Moore 1993 Native in tropical and southern Africa. On the Synonymous to S. kraussiana Azores status doubtful,possibly native, in some western European countries not native Schäfer 2003 Escaped ornamental plant, naturalised and Synonymous to S. kraussiana invasive; native to tropical and S Africa

29 J.F.N. van Leeuwen, H. Schäfer , W.O. van der Knaap, T. Rittenour, S. Björck & B. Ammann can continental plate. The island was pro- The taxon in question, Selaginella kraus- bably discovered in the early 14th century siana, shows high values since the begin- (Bento 1993) but remained uninhabited ning of the record, about 2435 radiocar- until 1472 when Wilhelm van der bon years BP, i.e. about 500 BC (calibra- Haegen founded a small settlement near ted). The record of this very characteristic the coast (Frutuoso 1589). Its landscape is continuous throughout the contains seven crater lakes. Lagoa Rasa approximately 2500 years recorded, whe- on Flores (39° 24.49823' N, 31° reas human impact sets in during the late 13.49822' W, 530 m a.s.l.) is, as the name 15th or early 16th century AD (at about suggests, a shallow lake. In 1998 we obtai- 190 cm sediment depth). ned 340 cm of sediment beneath 620 cm Spores of Selaginella kraussiana were of water with a square-rod piston corer also encountered in the sediments of (Wright 1991). Radiocarbon dates on ter- Lagoa do Caveiro on Pico (analysis: T. restrial plant macrofossils were obtained Rittenour). This lake has so-far the lon- at Utrecht and Poznan (details follow in gest sediment record found on the Amman et al. in prep.). For the pollen Azores, and the oldest cored sediments analysis of 45 samples reference material are radiocarbon dated to ca. 4000 years from the Palynological Laboratory of the BC (calibrated). High values of Selaginella Instituto Português de Arqueologia (Lis- kraussiana spores (up to 27 %) were found bon) was used as well as the keys of Reille in the oldest sediments and throughout (1992) and Punt & Blackmore (1991). the sediment sequence. Further palynological information These finds show that the taxon is nati- comes from Lagoa da Caveiro on the ve to at least two islands of the Azores island of Pico (38° 26.10' N, 28° 11.79' W, archipelago, Flores and Pico. 903 m a.s.l.), whose volcano is the highest mountain of Portugal, situated on the Eu- 4. Dicussion rasian plate in the central group of the Pielou (1992) states: “Oceanic islands (..) Azores. The 625 cm of sediment, mainly can only have acquired their biota by clay gyttja and gyttja, has a robust chro- jump dispersal”, and “waif biota (..) are nology based on >20 radiocarbon dates. disharmonic – they contain a dispropor- tionately high number of organisms adap- 3.Results ted to jump dispersal.” The sediment of Lagoa Rasa on Flores is Selaginella kraussiana on the Azores re- mainly organic gyttja, and the lowermost ceives three different biogeographical sta- 1.5 cm is compressed. Volcanic material, tuses, i.e. native, introduced/escaped/ e.g. pyroclastics, were not reached. The naturalised/invasive, or uncertain and was depth-age relationship is based on five even listed as Azorean endemic by radiocarbon dates. Gandoger (Tab. 1). It was first collected The complete results of pollen analysis on the Azores by C. F. Hochstetter in of Lagoa Rasa will be discussed in a sepa- 1838 and considered as a native species rate paper focussing on the composition but confused with Selaginella denticulata, of the vegetation before and after human which had never been collected in the impact (Ammann et al. in prep.). In Fig. 1 Azores. In 1870 H. C. Watson in his revi- we present a summary diagram and the sion of the flora of the Azores identified record of Selaginella kraussiana. the Azorean specimens as S. kraussiana

30 Native or introduced?

Fig. 1: Pollen and spore percentages.

(Watson 1870). Baker (1883) described a question of the biogeographical status of new endemic Selaginella azorica on the S. kraussiana on the Azores. basis of a single, sterile specimen collec- The degree of dispersibility of pro- ted by Arruda Furtado in the Azores. This pagules is a major factor for the colonisa- taxon was cited as Azorean endemic by tion of oceanic islands. Spores and minu- several authors (Tab. 1), but it was actual- te seeds can be transported very easily by ly seen on the islands (on Faial & Pico) wind. Adsersen (1995) in his overview of only by Tutin & Warburg (1932), who do groups of organisms and their dispersibi- not mention S. kraussiana, which today is lity mentions spores as the smallest ent- a very common plant on both islands. ities and therefore with the lowest percen- Alston (1956) stated that the type of S. tage of endemism. This is certainly true azorica is in fact only a form of the varia- for with many cosmopolitan ble S. kraussiana, which is the only species. However, there seems to be a Selaginella reported from the Azores wit- considerable difference in dispersibility hin the past 40 years. Thus we conclude between and pteridophyte spo- that the taxonomic questions have been res. Among the bryophytes of the Azores clarified and therefore concentrate on the very few true endemics occur, but among

31 J.F.N. van Leeuwen, H. Schäfer , W.O. van der Knaap, T. Rittenour, S. Björck & B. Ammann the c. 66 endemic species of Historical biogeography, as the inter- the Azores are seven (Schä- face between biogeography and geology, fer 2003). Apparently these pteridophytes usually attempts to explain disjunct range were unable to reach the nearby Madeira patterns with either plate tectonics or group, where they could have established Pleistocene glaciations as potential causes. populations under similar ecological con- But for the question of native or introdu- ditions. In the opposite direction, other ced, shorter time scales and a higher tem- pteridophytes such as Selaginella denticulata poral resolution are required. Human (not rare on Madeira), never seem to have impacts on flora and fauna are a pheno- reached the Azores. The transport of menon of the Holocene, i.e. the last short-lived spores of certain that 11,500 years, in which a temporal resolu- depend on high humidity and of large tion of 50 years or less is appropriate. On Selaginella megaspores, which are produced many remote islands, like the Azores, the in comparatively small numbers, seem to time period of human impact can be redu- be much more difficult than the transport ced to only a few hundred years. of small bryophyte spores. Thus, the first The precondition for the assessment of megaspores of Selaginella kraussiana, which a native or introduced status of a species has the largest megaspores of its genus, is that the taxon produces sufficient and were probably not transported by wind identifiable fossils (such as pollen, fruits, directly from the African continent to the chitinous remains). The fossils should the- Azores but originated from populations refore be morphologically unique, and the established earlier on Madeira. The total animal or plant should have lived close distance that had to be covered by wind enough to the basin where the fossil is transport is then reduced to c. 800 km. archived (usually a lake or mire). Sauer (1988) suggests that spores fol- Organisms that are not recorded are those low “Beijerinck’s Law: everything is eve- without hard fossilising parts (e.g., many rywhere but the environment selects”. amoebae), groups producing fossils that This would imply that the microspores of cannot be identified to species or genus Selaginella kraussiana observed in the pre- level (e.g., pollen of Poaceae), and species settlement sediments might have resulted producing good fossils but in insufficient from long-distance transport from the numbers (e.g., entomophilous plants of a African population, and it would then not dry meadow). In the middle-Atlantic indicate the local presence of the plant on islands, the absence of adequate lakes or the islands of Flores and Pico. But we feel peat bogs is also a major problem (e.g., confident that we can exclude long- Canaries, Madeira, Cabo Verde, lowland distance transport here for most of the regions of the Azores). But even with this microspores for the following reasons: (1) restriction, palaeoecology and biostrati- the spores are present in every sample graphy of Holocene deposits can clarify at studied, (2) the spores reach quite high least some cases of unclear status. percentages (ca. 2.5 % in Lagoa Rasa and >25 % in Lake Caveiro), and (3) high per- Conclusions centages are reached in a period with rich communities, including high pollen- and With palaeobotanical methods we could spore-producers, so the high spore per- unequivocally confirm the status of centages are not a result of generally low Selaginella kraussiana as native on the pollen or spore production. Azores islands. Its populations on

32 Native or introduced?

Madeira and the Canary Islands are pro- culaires. – Agronomia Lusitanica 23: 151- bably also native and can be considered as 181. Decocq, G. B. D., Wattez, J.-R. & Racinet, P. the connecting link between the main (2004): A practical approach to assess the African populations of Selaginella kraussia- native status of a rare plant species: the na and the remote Azores populations. controverse of Buxus sempervirens L. in For certain groups of organisms high- northern France. – Plant Ecology 173: resolution studies in Holocene lake sedi- 139-151. Dostal, J. (1984): Selaginella.In:G.Hegi: ments and peats may answer the question Illustrierte Flora Mitteleuropas. Vol. 1, when a certain taxon arrived in the area. Berlin The time of its arrival can then be com- Drouet, H. (1866): Catalogue de la Flore des pared to the traces of prehistoric or histo- îles Açores. – Mémoires de la Société ric human impact on the vegetation and académique de l'Aube 30: 81-233. Féraud, G., Kaneoka, I. & Allègre, C.-J (1980): environment. This may give a clue whet- K/Ar Ages and stress pattern in the her the taxon is native or introduced. For Azores: Geodynamic implications. – Earth plants, the analysis of pollen, spores, and and Planetary Science Letters 46: 275-286. macrofossils may provide an answer. Franco, J. do Amaral (1971): Nova Flora de Portugal (continente e Açores). Vol. 1. Thus we may fulfil the promise of “A Lisboa. Factual Basis for Phytogeography” Frutuoso, G. (1589): Saudades da Terra. Mscr. expressed by the subtitle of Sir Harry Reprint 1984. Ponta Delgada. Godwin’s (1975) monumental work “The Gandoger, M. (1899): Plantes nouvelles pour History of the British Flora”. We may les îles Açores. – Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 46: 252-258. thus contribute to “historical biogeogra- Godwin, H. (1975): The History of the phy” by concentrating on the Holocene British Flora. A Factual Basis for Phyto- and on human impact, thereby providing geography. Cambridge University Press. an interface between palaeoecology, bio- Hassler, M. & Swale, B. (2002): Family Sela- geography, and our efforts to recognise ginellaceae, genus Selaginella; world species list. At: http://homepages.caverock.net. early invasions. nz/~bj/fern/selaginella2.htm [accessed Sept. 2004]. References Kunze, G. (1844): Filicum in Promontorio Bonae Spei et ad Portum Natalensem. – Adsersen, H. (1995): Research on Islands: Linnaea 18: 113-124. Classic, Recent, and Prospective Approa- Nogueira, I. (1980): Selaginella kraussiana.In ches. Islands. Biological Diversity and Fernandes A. & Fernandes R. Batarda. Ecosystem Function 115 (ed. by H. Iconographia Selecta Florae Azoricae, vol. Adsersen). Springer, Berlin. 1(1), tab. 3. Coimbra. Alston, A. H. G. (1956): Selaginella. Royal Palhinha, R. Telles (1943): Pteridófitos do Horticultural Society, Dictionary of arquipélago dos Açores. – Boletim da Gardening. Suppl., 317. Sociedade Broteriana 2, ser. 17: 215-249. Baker, J. G. (1883): A synopsis of the genus Palhinha, R. Telles (1966): Catálogo das Selaginella. No. 58. – Journal of Botany 21: Plantas vasculares dos Açores. Lisboa. 210. Pielou, E. C. (1992): Biogeography. Krieger. Bento, C. Melo (1993): História dos Açores. 2. Punt, W. & Blackmore, S. (1991) The North- ed. Ponta Delgada. 177 pp. west European Pollen Flora VI. Elsevier, Braun, A. (1860): Selaginella kraussiana. Index Amsterdam. Seminum Hort. Bot. Berol. Append., 22. Reille, M. (1992): Pollen et Spores d’ et Cronk, Q. C. B. & Fuller, J. L. (1995): Plant d’Afrique du Nord, vol. 1 et supplément 1. Invaders. Chapman & Hall. Laboratoire de Botanique Historique et de Dansereau, P. (1961): Etudes macaronési- Palynologie, Marseille. ennes I. Géographie des cryptogames vas- Sauer, J. D. (1988): Plant Migration. The Dyna-

33 J.F.N. van Leeuwen, H. Schäfer , W.O. van der Knaap, T. Rittenour, S. Björck & B. Ammann

mics of Geographic Patterning in Seed Function, Vol. 115 (ed. P. M. Vitousek, L. Plant Species. University California Press, L. Loope & H. Adsersen). Springer, Berlin. Berkely, Los Angeles, London. 282 pp. Ward, C. M. (1970): The Pteridophytes of Schäfer, H. (2003): Chorology and Diversity Flores (Açores): a survey with bibliogra- of the Azorean Flora. Dissertationes phy. – Brit. Gazette 10(3): 119-126. Botanicae 374: 1-130 and CD (536 pp). Watson, H. C. (1844): Notes on the Botany of Seubert, M. & Hochstetter, C. F. (1843): Über- the Azores. – Journal of Botany (Hooker) sicht der Flora der azorischen Inseln. – 3: 614. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 9: 1-24. Watson, H. C. (1870): Botany of the Azores. Seubert, M. (1844): Flora Azorica. Adolph In: F. du Cane Godman, Natural History Marcus, Bonn. 50 pp. of the Azores or Western Islands, 113- Sjögren, E. (1973): Recent changes in the vas- 288. John van Voorst, London. cular flora and vegetation of the Açores Webb, D. A. (1985): What are the criteria for Islands. Memórias da Sociedade Broteri- presuming native status? – Watsonia 15: ana 22: 55-60. 231-236. Trelease, W. (1897): Botanical observations on Whittaker, R. J. (1995): Disturbed island ecol- the Azores. Missouri Botanical Garden ogy. – Trends Ecology Evolution 10: 421- Annual Report 1897, 177. 425. Tutin, T. G. & Warburg, E. F. (1932): Notes on Whittaker, R. J. (1998): Island Biogeography. the Flora of the Azores. – J. Bot. 70: 7-46. Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation. Valentine, H. & Moore, D. M. (1993): Selagi- Oxford University Press, Oxford. nella. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Williamson, M. (1996): Biological Invasions. Burges (eds): Flora Europaea. Vol. 1, 2. Chapman & Hall, London. edition, Cambridge. Wilson, K. A. (1996): Alien Ferns in Hawai’i. Vitousek, P. M., Adsersen, H. & Loope, L. L. – Pacific Science 50(2): 127-141. (1995): Why focus on Islands? In Islands. Wright, H. E. (1991): Coring tips. – Journal of Biological Diversity and Ecosystem Paleolimnology 6: 37-49.

34