Processes of International Negotiation Network Perspectives 44 Juni 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Processes of International Negotiation Network Perspectives 44 Juni 2017 PIN•Points Processes of International Negotiation Network Perspectives 44 juni 2017 IN THIS ISSUE: CURRENT AND FUTURE CHALLENGES IN NEGOTIATION MEDIATION IN WEST-AFRICA AND THE LEVANT NEGOTIATION AND MEDIATION IN EURASIA PREVIEWS OF PIN PUBLICATIONS 2 PIN•Points 44/2017 EDITORIAL The world today is faced with a will continue. Earlier mediation lenges, has bruited a new approach plethora of obstinate negotiation by two of the world’s leading dip- involving the whole region’s coming challenges: Syria, Cyprus, Pales- lomats went nowhere because the together in a cooperative secu- tine, North Korea, South Sudan, UN Security Council did not support rity endeavor, drowning the smaller Russia, not to speak of the im- its own mandate and the conflict cancer in a common health club. pending multilaterals over NAFTA, was not ripe in the central parties’ A pound of convention is worth an Brexit, NATO cost-sharing, and minds, a situation elaborated on in ounce of cure. Unlike Syria and others. Some of these represent an article by I. William Zartman and Cyprus, agreement may be more missed opportunities, others tacti- Raymond Hinnebusch in this issue within reach at this higher level; cal experiments, still others chal- of PINPoints. anyhow, it’s worth a try, as another lenge to creativity and construction, article by Moti Cristal in this issue and others the need for a tough Cyprus presents an opportunity for of PINPoints examines and Dr. Go- approach, but all have some les- resolution every decade and until lan speaks eloquently of it as well. sons for negotiating. The list is this decade has been destroyed elaborated on in the remarks of four by one party or the other, facing South Sudan, newly independent leading commentators presented at an S5 (Soft, Stable, Self-Serving from (North) Sudan, immediately the PIN-sponsored negotiation Day Stalemate) situation. This time, all fell into a fratricidal civil war when in Washington DC at the Johns Hop- depends on whether the leader of its external enemy was removed. kins University School of Advanced one of the patron parties, Turkey, Incredibly, two rival leaders, backed International Studies (SAIS) on 27 newly narrowly confirmed as dicta- by decades and more of tribal ani- February: Ambassador Thomas R tor, will throw his weight in favor of mosities, have been able to cause Pickering, former US Undersecre- an agreement that both North and hundreds of thousands of deaths, tary of State and ambassador to 6 South Cypriot parties grudgingly absorb billions of dollars of devel- different countries and the UN; Am- see in their own interests, prefer- opmental aid, absorb quantities of bassador Princeton Lyman, former able to a continued S5. As in Syria, arms from bystanding states, rank US Assistant Secretary of State and the external patrons generally op- second to last (175th) on Transpar- ambassador to Nigeria and to South erate to keep accord from breaking ency Inc.’s corruption scale, and Africa; Dr Galia Golan, professor out since the stalemate is serving thumb their noses at UN and emeritus at the Hebrew University most to their own selves. There may Western efforts to arrange a truce and at the Interdisciplinary Center be better chances of agreement if and peace. (The African Union com- Herzlia; and Dr. Vali Nasr, Dean of the local parties could be left alone mittee, with patrons of each side in SAIS and special advisor to Rich- to make their own agreement, as its membership, says only that they ard Holbrooke in Afghanistan and analyzed by Paul Meerts in an arti- should try again). Unfortunately, Pakistan. cle in this issue of PINPoints. there is no lesson because there is no process. An article in a fellow Syria represents a sick outcome Palestine/Israel still on the docket, publication, International Negotia- to the encouraging story of the despite efforts every US presiden- tion, examines the insolent tragedy Arab Spring, the only major case tial mandate to show that ripeness and Ambassador Lyman speaks of (among Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen is a subjective thing within the par- it as well. and Libya) where egregious au- ties, no matter what the objective tocracy, formerly considered the facts would indicate. As in Syria, North Korea poses an escalating Arab way of government, has not the parties both feel that they can challenge of serious proportions. been overthrown. It is now subject win but even more, that they daren’t The Six Party Talks have not met to a ceasefire that neither side re- lose. Yet it may be that the patron under Kim Jong Un and Barack spects, with no indication of what powers do feel the hurt of a stale- Obama, but the missile and nuclear comes next; the khilafa will be mate and the threat of a common industry in North Korea have made destroyed, leaving tentacles of the enemy. The new US administration, dangerous progress. New US Sec- hydra on their own, and civil war which seems to like Great Chal- retary of State Rex Tillerson has not www.pin-negotiation.org 3 CONTENTS COLOPHON PINPoints 2 EDITORIAL Copyright 2017 PIN 4 POTENTIAL NEGOTIATIONS IN THE UPCOMING YEAR: A SYMPOSIUM PINPoints is the biannual publication THOMAS PICKERING, PRINCETON LYMAN, GALIA GOLAN, VALI NASR of the Processes of International Negotiation Program (PIN). 17 ECOWAS MEDIATION IN THE GAMBIA MARK ANSTEY PIN is a non-profit group of scholars and practitioners that encourages 21 CYPRUS NEGOTIATIONS ON THE BRINK and organizes research on a broad PAUL MEERTS spectrum of topics related to international negotiation seen as 26 A REGIONAL PARADIGM FOR THE MIDDLE-EAST a process. The PIN network includes CONFLICT more than 4,000 scholars and MOTI CRISTAL practitioners of international negotiation. The organization is 30 RUSSIA IN CONFLICT MEDIATION: presided over by a Steering Committee, NEW OPPORTUNITIES, NEW TACTICS? which organizes its many activities and I. WILIAM ZARTMAN & MIKHAIL TROITSKIY edits the PINPoints. 33 TUG OF WAR: NEGOTIATING SECURITY IN EURASIA, PIN is a project of the Netherlands A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Institute of International Relations FEN OSLER HAMPSON & MIKHAIL TROITSKIY ‘Clingendael’, a leading think tank and academy on international affairs, 37 NEGOTIATING HISTORY IN EURASIA European integration and security VALERIE ROSOUX issues based in The Hague. 45 IN MEMORIAM – MORTON DEUTSCH Issue Editor: I. William Zartman GUY OLIVIER FAURE Associate Editors: 46 NEGOTIATING JUSTICE: FROM CONFLICT TO Chloe Colbert, Paul Meerts and COOPERATION 2017 PIN PROJECT ANNOUCEMENT Jan-Willem Pot CECILIA ALBIN Design and lay-out: 49 NEGOTIATING RECONCILIATION IN PEACEMAKING: Symon Maks - www.maksimaal.nl QUANDRIES OF RELATIONSHIP BUILDING BOOK PREVIEW ED. I. WILLIAM ZARTMAN Contact The Netherlands Institute of 51 INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATION: A JOURNAL OF International Relations ‘Clingendael’ THEORY AND PRACTICE Wilbur Perlot, PIN Coordinator JOURNAL PREVIEW Clingendael 7 2597 VH The Hague The Netherlands STEERING COMMITTEE: T +31 70 374 6681 E [email protected] W www.pin-negotiation.org M. CRISTAL MEERTS P. F. O. HAMPSON F. M. ANSTEY G. O. FAURE C. ALBIN W. PERLOT W. ROSOUX V. R. SCHÜSSLER ZARTMAN I W. M. TROITSKIY 4 PIN•Points 43/2016 ruled out negotiations but only after PART 1: AMBASSADOR THOMAS PICKERING “denuclearizing, giving up their weapons of mass destruction” or, POTENTIAL NEGOTIATIONS IN THE UPCOMING as earlier intimated, at least some YEAR: A SYMPOSIUM of them. That is not a promising start for a conflict that has known a US-DPRK Framework Agreement in 1994, Six-Party Talks in 2000-2008, In a world of tremendous and very open for that is a fundamental area of and several promises to denuclear- rapid change, change itself is part and common agreement. Were we able to ize. What it has not now, half a cen- parcel of all international problems we reach agreement on a one sentence tury after the war, is a peace treaty, are facing. Let us postulate some sets communique that says that we are and the escalating confrontation of issues on where negotiation can be both committed to keeping air and raises so many preceding hurdles a useful tool in dealing with them. sea lanes open, that would not only that it is ever more difficult to turn have begun the destruction of the to the underlying issue. In a classic First of all, issues of great power fiction of the nine-dash line, but it security dilemma, Pyongyang feels rivalries, for example the West would also open the door for other that the US is targeting it with sanc- dealing with Russia. There is a need agreements in the region. tions and if course it is right. It then for reducing the number of nuclear takes more measures to raise the weapons on both sides. We seem to The United States needs to avoid ante, in response or independently be prohibited by Putin’s reservations destroying Europe or allowing or for domestic reasons, all invit- from getting there and Trump’s Europeans destroy Europe, there is ing more sanctions. Such vicious blandish don’t seem to have opened no formula for that. The French voted spirals are hard to break. The only the door. Several of the precursors wisely and so did the Dutch. Hopefully lesson is that, as often, analysis is for that may well be how, and what the Germans will follow these not praxis, perception is not policy, way, ABM cooperation could be examples. It is hoped that our friends empathy is not engagement, and designed and usefully pursued. And in London are confecting an article 50 that understanding is useless if it in a world of logic and rationale that legislation for the British parliament does not help us think how to im- would be an important step towards that will build in the notion that the prove the situation.
Recommended publications
  • From Crisis to Opportunity for Sustainable Peace
    From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19 From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19 November 2020 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2020 First published 2020 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publishing (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. From crisis to opportunity for sustainable peace: A joint perspective on responding to the health, employment and peacebuilding challenges in times of COVID-19. International Labour Office, Interpeace, United Nations Peacebuilding Support Office and World Health Organization – Geneva: ILO, 2020 ISBN 9789220336809 (web PDF) Also available in French: De la crise à l’opportunité d’une paix durable.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Mixed Signaling Strategies in International Crisis Negotiations
    USE OF MIXED SIGNALING STRATEGIES IN INTERNATIONAL CRISIS NEGOTIATIONS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Unislawa M. Wszolek, B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Brian Pollins, Adviser Daniel Verdier Adviser Randall Schweller Graduate Program in Political Science ABSTRACT The assertion that clear signaling prevents unnecessary war drives much of the recent developments in research on international crises signaling, so much so that this work has aimed at identifying types of clear signals. But if clear signals are the only mechanism for preventing war, as the signaling literature claims, an important puzzle remains — why are signals that combine both carrot and stick components sent and why are signals that are partial or ambiguous sent. While these signals would seemingly work at cross-purposes undermining the signaler’s goals, actually, we observe them frequently in crises that not only end short of war but also that realize the signaler’s goals. Through a game theoretic model, this dissertation theorizes that because these alternatives to clear signals increase the attractiveness, and therefore the likelihood, of compliance they are a more cost-effective way to show resolve and avoid unnecessary conflict than clear signals. In addition to building a game theoretic model, an additional contribution of this thesis is to develop a method for observing mixed versus clear signaling strategies and use this method to test the linkage between signaling and crisis outcomes. Results of statistical analyses support theoretical expectations: clear signaling strategies might not always be the most effective way to secure peace, while mixed signaling strategies can be an effective deterrent.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Journal of International Law 2015 Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hayek, Vincent El, "Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law" (2015). Minnesota Journal of International Law. 286. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/286 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Journal of International Law collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Palestinian Economic Development: Israeli Actions in Light of the 1994 Paris Protocol and International Economic Law Vincent El Hayek In 1993, Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization signed the Oslo Accords,' starting a peace process that was meant to end with a Palestinian State. The Oslo Accords were only the start of numerous agreements, including the 1994 Gaza-Jericho Agreement, which became Annex IV to the Accords, commonly known as the Paris Protocol.2 The Paris Protocol laid out the framework for what was to be the economic relationship between Israel and a Palestinian state. Its writers recognized the importance that stability and growth in the Palestinian economy had for any hope of a lasting peace. 3 As such, they developed a strategy which hinged on four "pillars" for Palestinian economic development: 11] International aid; [2] close Israeli-Palestinian economic relations; [3] foreign and private investment; and [4] access to foreign markets for Palestinian exports.4 When the Paris Protocol was first signed, excitement was high.
    [Show full text]
  • International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War
    Mercer Law Review Volume 43 Number 2 Lead Articles I - The Legal Article 1 Implications of a Nation at War 3-1992 International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War Francis A. Boyle Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the International Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Boyle, Francis A. (1992) "International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran- Iraq War," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 43 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol43/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEAD ARTICLES International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy Toward the Iran-Iraq War by Francis A. Boyle* Prescript This Article was written in 1986 and submitted to the University of New Orleans Symposium on Neutrality. The Article reflects the author's analysis regarding the United States military intervensionism into the Middle East with a special focus on the Persian Gulf region. The author analyzes the United States' policies to divide-and-conquer the Arab oil * Professor of International Law, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illi- nois. University of Chicago (A.B., 1971); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1976); Harvard University (A.M., 1978 and Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Talking to the Enemy Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia Dalia Dassa Kaye NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION This research was conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center (ISDP) of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus
    Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus DECEMBER 2011 INTERNATIONAL PEACE INSTITUTE Cover Photo: UN Secretary-General ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ban Ki-moon (left) is received by Guillaume Soro, Prime Minister of IPI owes a debt of thanks to its many donors, whose Côte d'Ivoire, at Yamoussoukro support makes publications like this one possible. In partic - airport. May 21, 2011. © UN ular, IPI would like to thank the governments of Finland, Photo/Basile Zoma. Norway, and Sweden for their generous contributions to The views expressed in this paper IPI's Coping with Crisis Program. Also, IPI would like to represent those of the authors and thank the Mediation Support Unit of the UN Department of not necessarily those of IPI. IPI Political Affairs for giving it the opportunity to contribute welcomes consideration of a wide range of perspectives in the pursuit to the process that led up to the Secretary-General's report of a well-informed debate on critical on preventive diplomacy. policies and issues in international affairs. IPI Publications Adam Lupel, Editor and Senior Fellow Marie O’Reilly, Publications Officer Suggested Citation: Francesco Mancini, ed., “Preventive Diplomacy: Regions in Focus,” New York: International Peace Institute, December 2011. © by International Peace Institute, 2011 All Rights Reserved www.ipinst.org CONTENTS Introduction . 1 Francesco Mancini Preventive Diplomacy in Africa: Adapting to New Realities . 4 Fabienne Hara Optimizing Preventive-Diplomacy Tools: A Latin American Perspective . 15 Sandra Borda Preventive Diplomacy in Southeast Asia: Redefining the ASEAN Way . 28 Jim Della-Giacoma Preventive Diplomacy on the Korean Peninsula: What Role for the United Nations? . 35 Leon V.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution
    Cultural Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution Introduction In his poem, The Second Coming (1919), William Butler Yeats captured the moment we are now experiencing: Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. As we see the deterioration of the institutions created and fostered after the Second World War to create a climate in which peace and prosperity could flourish in Europe and beyond, it is important to understand the role played by diplomacy in securing the stability and strengthening the shared values of freedom and democracy that have marked this era for the nations of the world. It is most instructive to read the Inaugural Address of President John F. Kennedy, in which he encouraged Americans not only to do good things for their own country, but to do good things in the world. The creation of the Peace Corps is an example of the kind of spirit that put young American volunteers into some of the poorest nations in an effort to improve the standard of living for people around the globe. We knew we were leaders; we knew that we had many political and economic and social advantages. There was an impetus to share this wealth. Generosity, not greed, was the motivation of that generation. Of course, this did not begin with Kennedy. It was preceded by the Marshall Plan, one of the only times in history that the conqueror decided to rebuild the country of the vanquished foe.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Operations Lexicon
    Complex Operations Lexicon Senior Editor R. Scott Moore, PhD Principal Researcher Christopher Ehrhart Contributors Geary Cox Aileen McLaren Scott Miller Jenny Mitchell Nicole Neitzey Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Introduction iv Lexicon of Terms 1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 172 Sources 192 Center for Complex Operations 198 ii Acknowledgements The research and writing of this lexicon would not have been possible without the efforts and dedication of a wide range of organizations and people. Thanks must first be given to those individuals from the US Departments of Defense and State, the US Agency for International Development, the United Nations, NATO, the NGO community, and a host of other official and semi-official organizations whose largely anonymous but important work compiled the many word lists, glossaries, and publications that form the basis of this lexicon. The list of sources offers but a sampling of their efforts. Within the Center for Complex Operations (CCO), a host of research associates and student interns conducted literature reviews and research, sought out new sources, contacted government agencies, proofread drafts, and cross-checked definitions and references over the course of many months. Notable among these individuals was Scott Miller, whose research acumen resulted in an initial draft that formed the core of the lexicon. Jenny Mitchell and Aileen McLaren spent long hours doing the necessary final editing as well as ensuring each term was appropriately and accurately cited. For those whose names may not be listed, rest assured your contributions did not go unnoticed and are much appreciated. James Madison University’s Center for International Stabilization and Recovery (CISR) fleshed an original draft into a robust reference of value across the community of conflict practitioners, military and civilian, by drawing in the language of a diverse set of communities who operate in conflict zones.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRINK BACK to the Hague Centre for Strategic Studies the BRINK ESCALATION and INTERSTATE CRISIS
    HCSS StratMon 2016 StratMon HCSS HCSS StratMon 2016 BACK ON THE BRINK BACK TO The Hague THE BRINK Centre for Strategic Studies Centre for Strategic ESCALATION AND INTERSTATE CRISIS The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies < TABLE OF CONTENTS HCSS helps governments, non-governmental organizations and the private sector to understand the fast-changing environment and seeks to anticipate the challenges of the future with practical policy solutions and advice. HCSS STRATEGIC MONITOR 2016 1 BACK TO THE BRINK ESCALATION AND INTERSTATE CRISIS HCSS StratMon 2016 The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies ISBN/EAN: 978-94-92102-33-1 Authors Tim Sweijs, Artur Usanov, Rik Rutten Thanks to Stephan de Spiegeleire, Frank Bekkers, Scott Michael Ward, Willem Theo Oosterveld and Clarissa Skinner The HCSS StratMon Program offers strategic assessments of global risks to Dutch national security. The Program has received financial support from the Dutch Government within the context of the Dutch Government’s Strategic Monitor. © 2016The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced and/or published in any form by print, photo print, microfilm or any other means without prior written permission from HCSS. All images are subject to the licenses of their respective owners. Graphic Design Dana Polackova & Studio Maartje de Sonnaville The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies Lange Voorhout 16 [email protected] 2514 EE The Hague HCSS.NL The Netherlands BACK TO THE BRINK ESCALATION AND INTERSTATE CRISIS HCSS StratMon 2016 The
    [Show full text]
  • The Looming Crisis: Displacement and Security in Iraq
    Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS POLICY PAPER Number 5, August 2008 The Looming Crisis: Displacement and Security in Iraq Elizabeth G. Ferris The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20036 brookings.edu Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS POLICY PAPER Number 5, August 2008 The Looming Crisis: Displacement and Security in Iraq Elizabeth G. Ferris -APOF)RAQ Map: ICG, “Iraq’s Civil War, the Sadrists, and the Surge.” Middle East Report No. 72, 7 February 2008. &OREIGN0OLICYAT"ROOKINGSIII ,ISTOF!CRONYMS AQI Al Qaeda in Iraq CAP Consolidated Appeals Process CPA Coalition Provisional Authority CRRPD Commission for the Resolution of Real Property Disputes EIA Energy Information Administration (U.S.) GOI Government of Iraq ICG International Crisis Group ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IDPs Internally Displaced Persons IOM International Organization for Migration IRIN Integrated Regional Information Service ITG Iraqi Transitional Government KRG Kurdistan Regional Government MNF-I Multi-National Force Iraq MoDM/MoM Ministry of Displacement and Migration (recently renamed Ministry of Migration) NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NCCI NGO Coordination Committee in Iraq OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs PDS Public Distribution System PKK Kurdistan Workers’ Party PLO Palestinian Liberation Organization PRTs Provincial Reconstruction Teams RSG Representative of the Secretary-General TAL Transitional Administrative Law UIA United Iraqi Alliance UNAMI United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq UNDP United Nations Development Program UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund USAID U.S. Agency for International Development USG United States Government &OREIGN0OLICYAT"ROOKINGSV !WORDONTERMINOLOGY The term “displaced” is used here to refer to both refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) which have clear meanings in international law.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) Introduction
    Collen V. Kelapile DIP‐401 1 Student Name: COLLEN V. KELAPILE Student Country: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Course Code or Name: DIP‐401 Professor / Assigned Tutor: ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ Note: This paper uses US English (with punctuation and rule of style). NEGOTIATION: THE MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTION OF DIPLOMACY 1) INTRODUCTION Geoff R. Berridge observes that negotiation is one of the functions of diplomacy and correctly identifies the other diplomatic duties, including gathering of information, clarifying intentions and promotion of goodwill. He nonetheless asserts that negotiation is “the most important function of diplomacy”1 if the latter is conceived in a broader sense. Jean‐Robert Leguey‐Feilleux, on the other hand, sees 1 G.R. Berridge, Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave, 2005, pp. 27, 214 -215. Collen V. Kelapile DIP‐401 2 negotiation as one among several functions of diplomacy. He said: “Diplomacy serves a large variety of functions, and negotiation, albeit important, is only one of them.”2 A premise in this argument is that, in today’s international relations, negotiation takes place more often than the other functions. While the trend has declined in bilateral relations, it is much dominant in multilateral diplomacy. Though at times ceremonial and symbolic, summit level interactions are equally frequent. Mediation is also undertaken as “a special kind of negotiation designed to promote the settlement of a conflict.”3 My diplomatic experience informs me that the importance of negotiation is not exaggerated. As discussed below, evidence suggests that disputes and conflicts permeate every sphere of our existence. Diplomacy is of constant resort and negotiation is pervasively utilized.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. II: Anns. 1-29
    Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official character 14579 Corr. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING IMMUNITIES AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (EQUATORIAL GUINEA v. FRANCE) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF EQUATORIAL GUINEA VOLUME II (Annexes 1-29) 3 January 2017 [Translation by the Registry] LIST OF ANNEXES Annex Page 1. Basic Law of Equatorial Guinea (new text of the Constitution of Equatorial 1 Guinea, officially promulgated on 16 February 2012, with the texts of the Constitutional Reform approved by referendum on 13 November 2011) 2. Regulation No. 01/03-CEMAC-UMAC of the Central African Economic and 43 Monetary Community 3. Decree No. 64/2012, 21 May 2012 44 4. Decrees Nos. 67/2012, 66/2012, 65/2012 and 63/2012, 21 May 2012 46 5. Institutional Declaration by the President of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, 47 21 October 2015 6. Presidential Decree No. 55/2016, 21 June 2016 49 7. Paris Tribunal de grande instance, Order for partial dismissal and partial 51 referral of proceedings to the Tribunal correctionnel, 5 September 2016 (regularized by order of 2 December 2016) 8. Paris Tribunal de grande instance, Public Prosecutor’s Office, Application for 88 characterization, 4 July 2011 9. Report of the Public Prosecutor of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, 91 22 November 2010 10. Summons to attend a first appearance, 22 May 2012 93 11. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Note Verbale No. 2777/PRO/PID, 96 20 June 2012 12. Letter from the investigating judges to the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 98 25 June 2012 13.
    [Show full text]