DOCSLIB.ORG

4.0 Technical Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

4.0 Technical Appendices Appendix Document Title Author Approval Status A Bushfire Management Plan Eco Logical Australia B Environmental Assessment Report 360 Environmental C Local Water Management Strategy Hyd2o D Transport Impact Assessment Transcore E Engineering Infrastructure Report TABEC Lots 1-38 Caporn Street & Lot 9015 Saponara Drive, Wanneroo | Structure Plan 32 APPENDIX A Bushfire Management Plan Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan: Caporn Street, Wanneroo Acumen Development Solutions © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan: Caporn Street, Wanneroo | Acumen Development Solutions DOCUMENT TRACKING Project Name Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan Caporn Street, Wanneroo Project Number 19PER-12726 Project Manager James Leonard Prepared by James Leonard Reviewed by Daniel Panickar (BPAD Level 3 – 37802) Approved by Daniel Panickar (BPAD Level 3 – 37802) Status Draft Version Number v1 Last saved on 18 August 2020 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2020. Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan: Caporn St, Wanneroo . Prepared for Acumen Development Solutions.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Acumen Development Solutions. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Acumen Development Solutions . The scope of services was defined in consultation with Acumen Development Solutions , by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. Template 2.8.1 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD i Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan: Caporn Street, Wanneroo | Acumen Development Solutions Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Proposal details .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and application of the plan ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental considerations .............................................................................................................. 1 2. Bushfire assessment results ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Bushfire assessment inputs .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Vegetation classification ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Topography and slope under vegetation .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Post-development bushfire assessment ........................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Assessment outputs.............................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 BHL assessment ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Identification of issues arising from the BHL assessment ..................................................................... 7 3. Assessment against the Bushfire Protection Criteria ................................................................... 11 3.1 Compliance ......................................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Additional management strategies ..................................................................................................... 13 4. Implementation and enforcement ............................................................................................. 15 5. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 16 6. References ................................................................................................................................ 17 Appendix A – Plates....................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix B – Standards for Asset Protection Zones ........................................................................ 26 List of Figures Figure 1: Site overview ............................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2: Proposed District Structure Plan ................................................................................................. 2 Figure 3: Bushfire Prone Areas ................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 4: Vegetation classification ............................................................................................................. 5 Figure 5: Bushfire Hazard Level (BHL) assessment – predevelopment ...................................................... 9 Figure 6: Bushfire Hazard Level (BHL) assessment – post development ................................................. 10 Figure 7: Spatial representation of the bushfire management strategies ............................................... 14 Figure 8: Illustrated tree canopy cover projection (WAPC 2017) ............................................................ 26 List of Tables Table 1: Bushfire Hazard Level assessment ............................................................................................... 7 Table 2: Summary of solutions used to achieve bushfire performance criteria ...................................... 11 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Bushfire Management Plan: Local Structure Plan: Caporn Street, Wanneroo | Acumen Development Solutions 1. Introduction 1.1 Proposal details Eco Logical Australia (ELA) was commissioned by Acumen Development Solutions to prepare a Bushfire Management Plan (BMP) to support a Local Structure Plan being lodged over Multiple Lots Caporn Street, Wanneroo (hereafter referred to as the subject site; Figure 1; Figure 2). The entire subject site is within a designated bushfire prone area as per the Western Australia State Map of Bush Fire Prone Areas (DFES 2019; Figure 3), which triggers bushfire planning requirements under State Planning Policy 3.7 Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas (SPP 3.7; WAPC 2015) and reporting to accompany submission of the Structure Plan in accordance with the associated Guidelines for Planning in Bushfire Prone Areas v 1.3 (the Guidelines; WAPC 2017). This assessment has been prepared by ELA Bushfire Consultant James Leonard with quality assurance undertaken by ELA Senior Bushfire Consultant, Daniel Panickar (FPAA BPAD Level 3 Certified Practitioner No. BPAD37802-L3). 1.2 Purpose and application of the plan The primary purpose of this BMP is to act as a technical supporting document to inform planning assessment. This BMP is also designed to provide guidance on how to plan for and manage the bushfire risk to the subject site through implementation of a range of bushfire management measures in accordance with the Guidelines. 1.3 Environmental considerations Some bushfire prone areas also have high biodiversity values. SPP 3.7 policy objective 5.4 recognises the need to consider bushfire risk management measures alongside environmental, biodiversity and conservation values. Environmental approvals for the development are being obtained and impacts associated with bushfire protection measures have been considered through consultation with the project team. Some retention and revegetation is proposed within the subject site and this has been accounted for in the post development Bushfire Hazard Level assessments. A summary of the retention considerations is provided below and depicted in Figure 2: • Within the Public Open Space (POS) areas, it is noted that clearing/thinning of vegetation will be required for drainage, POS facilities etc. Areas to be retained are yet to be determined and will be finalised through the subsequent planning processes (e.g. Structure Plans and subdivision); and • It is not anticipated that any revegetation within POS areas will be undertaken. These considerations are addressed further in section 2 and any changes to revegetation and/or landscaping will be addressed in future BMPs. © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 Figure 1: Site Overview Joondalup (! Wangara (! Beechboro (! Perth (! Caporn St d a G o R a r r d a j e n n i P P a r k D r 0 65 130 260 Legend Metres Subject site Datum/Projection: GDA
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J

    Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp.
  • AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements

    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements

    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name.
  • Are Mitochondrial Genes Useful for the Analysis of Monocot Relationships?

    Are Mitochondrial Genes Useful for the Analysis of Monocot Relationships?

    55 (4) • November 2006: 857–870 Davis & al. • Mitochondrial genes for monocot phylogeny Are mitochondrial genes useful for the analysis of monocot relationships? Jerrold I. Davis1, Gitte Petersen2, Ole Seberg2, Dennis W. Stevenson3, Christopher R. Hardy4, Mark P. Simmons5, Fabian A. Michelangeli3, Douglas H. Goldman6, Lisa M. Campbell3, Chelsea D. Specht7 & James I. Cohen1 1 L. H. Bailey Hortorium and Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, U.S.A. [email protected] (author for correspondence). 2 Botanical Garden and Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Sølvgade 83, Opg. S, DK-1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark. 3 Institute of Systematic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458, U.S.A. 4 Department of Biology, Millersville University, Millersville, Pennsylvania 17551, U.S.A. 5 Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U.S.A. 6 Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A. 7 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. A phylogenetic analysis of monocots and related dicots was conducted, using a four-gene matrix consisting of two genes from the plastid genome (matK and rbcL) and two from the mitochondrial genome (atpA/atp1 and cob). The taxon sample includes 101 monocots and 36 dicots, and all four genes were sampled for all 137 taxa. Jackknife support was assessed for clades resolved by the four-gene analysis, and compared to support for the same clades by each of the four three-gene subset matrices, in order to quantify the degree to which each gene contributed to or detracted from support for each clade.
  • Environmental Impact Assessment.PDF

    Environmental Impact Assessment.PDF

    City of Wanneroo Mather Drive Environmental Impact Assessment Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd 57 Boulder Rd, Malaga WA, 6090 Ph: (08) 9209 2767 [email protected] www.naturalarea.com.au City of Wanneroo Mather Drive Environmental Impact Assessment Disclaimer Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as Natural Area Consulting Management Services (Natural Area), has prepared this report for the sole use of the Client and for the purposes as stated in the agreement between the Client and Natural Area under which this work was completed. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written agreement of Natural Area. Natural Area has exercised due and customary care in the preparation of this document and has not, unless specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. Therefore, Natural Area assumes no liability for any loss resulting from errors, omission or misrepresentations made by others. This document has been made at the request of the Client. The use of this document by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Natural Area shall be at their own risk, and we accept no duty of care to any such third party. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on circumstances and facts as they existed at the time Natural Area performed the work. Any changes in such circumstances and facts upon which this document is based may adversely affect any recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this document.
  • Nzbotsoc No 72 June 2003

    Nzbotsoc No 72 June 2003

    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 72 JUNE 2003 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Doug Rogan Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 Subscriptions The 2003 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2003 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28th February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2003 issue (73) is 25 August 2003. Please post contributions to: Joy Talbot 17 Ford Road Christchurch 8002 Send email contributions to [email protected] Files are preferably in MS Word (Word XP or earlier) or saved as RTF or ASCII.

  • South Coast, Western Australia

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.

  • Structuration Écologique Et Évolutive Des Symbioses

    Structuration ´ecologiqueet ´evolutive des symbioses mycorhiziennes des orchid´eestropicales Florent Martos To cite this version: Florent Martos. Structuration ´ecologiqueet ´evolutive des symbioses mycorhiziennes des or- chid´eestropicales. Biologie v´eg´etale. Universit´ede la R´eunion,2010. Fran¸cais. <NNT : 2010LARE0019>. <tel-00732894> HAL Id: tel-00732894 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00732894 Submitted on 17 Sep 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. Universit´ede La R´eunion – Ecole´ doctorale Sciences Technologie Sant´e– Facult´edes Sciences et des Technologies Structuration ´ecologique et ´evolutive des symbioses mycorhiziennes des orchid´ees tropicales Th`ese de doctorat pr´esent´ee et soutenue publiquement le 19 novembre 2010 pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Universit´ede la R´eunion (sp´ecialit´eBiologie des Populations et Ecologie)´ par Florent Martos Composition du jury Pr´esidente : Mme Pascale Besse, Professeur `al’Universit´ede La R´eunion Rapporteurs : Mme Marie-Louise Cariou, Directrice de recherche au CNRS de Gif-sur-Yvette M. Raymond Tremblay, Professeur `al’Universit´ede Porto Rico Examinatrice : Mme Pascale Besse, Professeur `al’Universit´ede La R´eunion Directeurs : M.

  • Borello, Neerabup V1.1

    Borrello Family Level 2 Flora Survey – Lot 902 Flynn Drive Neerabup D1 – 17 October 2019 Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd 99C Lord Street, Whiteman, WA, 6076 Ph: (08) 9209 2767 [email protected] www.naturalarea.com.au Mr Mark Borrello Level 2 Flora Survey – Lot 902 Flynn Drive Neerabup Disclaimer Natural Area Holdings Pty Ltd, trading as Natural Area Consulting Management Services (Natural Area), has prepared this report for the sole use of the Client and for the purposes as stated in the agreement between the Client and Natural Area under which this work was completed. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written agreement of Natural Area. Natural Area has exercised due and customary care in the preparation of this document and has not, unless specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. Therefore, Natural Area assumes no liability for any loss resulting from errors, omission or misrepresentations made by others. This document has been made at the request of the Client. The use of this document by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Natural Area shall be at their own risk, and we accept no duty of care to any such third party. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on circumstances and facts as they existed at the time Natural Area performed the work. Any changes in such circumstances and facts upon which this document is based may adversely affect any recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this document.
  • Isolation and Characterization of Epiphytic Orchidaceous Mycorrhizas Associated with the Populations of Rhynchostylis Retusa from Kangra Valley, Himachal Pradesh

    Isolation and Characterization of Epiphytic Orchidaceous Mycorrhizas Associated with the Populations of Rhynchostylis Retusa from Kangra Valley, Himachal Pradesh

    Isolation and characterization of epiphytic Orchidaceous Mycorrhizas associated with the populations of Rhynchostylis retusa from Kangra valley, Himachal Pradesh A dissertation submitted in the partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MICROBIOLOGY Under the supervision of: Prof M. Sudhakara Reddy Co supervisor: Dr. Anil Kumar By Yadvinder Bhardwaj (Reg No. 301205013) Department of Biotechnology Thapar University, Patiala-147004 Punjab (India) JULY 2014 i i ii iii Abstract Orchids are most extravagant group of flowering plants and are getting depleted and threatened due to habitat destruction, macroclimatic changes, shifting cultivation, overexploitation and developmental activities. Orchids produce the smallest seeds (nearly microscopic in size) of any flowering plant. These dust-like seeds are produced in great numbers, often over a million seeds per plant and lack an endosperm, resulting in a small embryo covered only by a thin protective wall. This lack of storage tissues for food reserves and protection makes the seeds extremely vulnerable to their environment, resulting in a high mortality rate unless optimum conditions are found for germination. The rate of seed germination in nature is very poor, that is, 2-5%. The symbiotic association between epiphytic orchids and mycorrhizal fungi is vital for essential nutrient supply during germination and seed establishment. Most of the mycorrhizal fungi of orchids fall into a non- sporing group known as Rhizoctonia, Rhizoctonia solani is a common symbiont of the members of Orchidaceae. Rhynchostylis retusa(L.) Bl. is a epiphytic orchid species found in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India. The ITS region is highly variable among fungal species, allowing to discrimination between even closely related species-based mycological studies at the sub-generic level and used for fungal species identification.
  • Native Vascular Plant Taxa SWAFR

    Native Vascular Plant Taxa SWAFR

    SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:08:17 AM This analysis uses a pro tem definition of the SWAFR that served to define the study area. It was based on the collection of IBRA 6.1 bioregions most closely approximating the original definition of the Southwest Province by Beard (1980). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. Native vascular taxa with current names Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFIBR with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_NATIVE. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. SWAFR - IBRA Area (ha): 29,851,921 Records: 365,276 Taxa: Native 8,133 Endemics: 3,663 Families: 133 Genera: 720 Conservation Status: P1 442 P2 559 P3 596 P4 297 T 394 X 6 MS Status: ms 50 pn 838 pub 7,245 Hybrids: 38 Rank: Species 6,648 Subsp. 1,485 Top 10 families (native) Top 10 genera (native) Species Records Species Records Myrtaceae 1396 64580 Acacia 513 24062 Fabaceae 1118 53100 Eucalyptus 372 19538 Proteaceae 910 40648 Grevillea 245 9215 Orchidaceae 421 14514 Stylidium 217 9936 Ericaceae 361 17127 Leucopogon 210 9322 Asteraceae 304 13639 Banksia 208 8784 Cyperaceae 258 10697 Melaleuca 191 11084 Stylidiaceae 226 10591 Caladenia 177 5440 Goodeniaceae 220 11545 Verticordia 139 7099 Malvaceae 183 6085 Gastrolobium 111 4679 Wednesday, 22 June 2016 Page 1 of 50 Endemics Species Status Acacia acellerata Acacia aciphylla Acacia aculeiformis Acacia adjutrices P3 Acacia aemula subsp.
  • Ancient Polyploidy and Genome Evolution in Palms

    Ancient Polyploidy and Genome Evolution in Palms

    Faculty & Staff Scholarship 2019 Ancient Polyploidy and Genome Evolution in Palms Craig F. Barrett Michael R. McKain Brandon T. Sinn Xue Jun Ge Yuqu Zhang See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Biology Commons Authors Craig F. Barrett, Michael R. McKain, Brandon T. Sinn, Xue Jun Ge, Yuqu Zhang, Alexandre Antonelli, and Christine D. Bacon GBE Ancient Polyploidy and Genome Evolution in Palms Craig F. Barrett1,*, Michael R. McKain2, Brandon T. Sinn1, Xue-Jun Ge3, Yuqu Zhang3, Alexandre Antonelli4,5,6, and Christine D. Bacon4,5 1Department of Biology, West Virginia University 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama 3Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article-abstract/11/5/1501/5481000 by guest on 05 May 2020 4Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden 5Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Go¨ teborg, Sweden 6Royal Botanical Gardens Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: April 19, 2019 Data deposition: This project has been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession BioProject (PRJNA313089). Abstract Mechanisms of genome evolution are fundamental to our understanding of adaptation and the generation and maintenance of biodiversity, yet genome dynamics are still poorly characterized in many clades. Strong correlations between variation in genomic attributes and species diversity across the plant tree of life suggest that polyploidy or other mechanisms of genome size change confer selective advantages due to the introduction of genomic novelty.