DOCSLIB.ORG

FIREFORCE EXPOSED the Rhodesian Security Forces and Their

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FIREFORCE EXPOSED the Rhodesian Security Forces and Their FIREFORCE EXPOSED The Rhodesian security forces and their role in defending white supremacy CONTENTS Page FOREWORD iii INTRODUCTION 1 WHOCONTROLSTHESECURITYFORCES? 2 MILITARY SPENDING 3 MANPOWERFORTHESECURITYFORCES 5 CONSCRIPTION -WHITES, ASIANS & COLOUREDS 7 CONSCRIPTION -AFRICANS 9 THE ARMY 12 THE SELOUS SCOUTS 17 THE POLICE FORCE 20 THE GUARD FORCE 24 INTERNAL AFFAIRS 25 THE AIR FORCE 26 AIRFIELDS AND AIRSTRIPS 30 MERCENARIES 31 SECURITYFORCEAUXILIARIES 33 SOUTH AFRICAN COLLABORATION 36 THE RHODESIAN ARMS INDUSTRY 37 CHEMICALWARFARE 39 RACISM IN THE SECURITY FORCES 40 DISAFFECTION AND DESERTION 42 CONCLUSION 45 AppendixI:ARMSSUPPLIESTORHODESIA 46 Appendix I1: INVENTORY OF RHODESIAN ARMAMENTS 50 Appendix III: RHODESIAN AIRCRAFT REPORTED SHOT DOWN 51 BY THE PATRIOTIC FRONT Appendix IV: SELECTED PRESS CUTTINGS 52 ANTI-APARTHEID MOVEMENT 89 Charlotte Street, London W1P. 2DQ November 1979 ISBN No. 0 900065 04 4 Typset at Alden Press Oxford, London and Northampton Printed by Anvil Printers Ltd. (T.U.) FOREWORD This book is being published at a time of heightening war in Southern Africa. While'the future of the people of Zimbabwe is being debated at Lancaster House in London, events are taking place on the ground which, while they receive little coverage in the Western press and media, clearly reveal the aggressive and menacing character of the white supremacist regimes. In the current discussions on the future of Zimbabwe, there is major division about the process of transition to genuine majority rule. The illegal regime in Salisbury and the British government both insist that the existing Rhodesian security forces should be used to "police" the transitional period. The Patriotic Front, however, has demanded that the transitional period be supervised by an impartial international force, followed by the establishment of an army and police force which genuinely serve the interests of a new and democratic Zimbabwe. In the process of transforming the present war situation to a peaceful society, it is impossible to conceive of those forces which have upheld the system of white supremacy for so many years being "impartial" in any way. This book gives details which are crucial to a proper understanding of the Rhodesian situation. It must also be remembered that the Rhodesian forces operate, in effect, as an informal extension of the South African armed forces, both in their repressive role inside Zimbabwe and in the attacks which they repeatedly carry out against the front line states. The retention of these forces will assure South Africa that its interests in the region will be more adequately protected, and that Pretoria will exercise substantial influence and control over the process of change. Anyone who reads this book cannot but reach the conclusion that no genuine peace is possible without disbanding the existing forces. Abdul S. Minty Hon. Secretary, Anti-Apartheid Movement INTRODUCTION In August 1979, Bishop Muzorewawas reminded by a British television interviewer that at the opening of the Geneva constitutional talks nearly three years before, he had delivered a hard-hitting speech in which he had accused the Rhodesian army of conducting a -reign of terror and extermination against the rural population of Zimbabwe. Interviewer: Do you think that's changed now you're head of the security forces? Muzorewa: I believe it has been customary in the history of decolonisation by the British government, that the forces who were there before are taken by those who come to power. The only thing we must do now, and that I must do now, is (to ensure) that they behave in a relationship to the people (which) reflects that they are forces of a popularly elected government. And that is what we are doing, that is what I am doing as the head of these forces. (Taken from a live television interview with Bishop Muzorewa, ITV "Face the Press", 5.8.79) Bishop Muzorewa's revised opinion of the Rodesian security forces is perhaps the most dramatic symptom of his decision to abandon the aims and ideals of the Zimbabwean liberation struggle and to throw in his lot with the illegal regime. From the time of his entry on to the political stage in 1971, up to and even beyond the Geneva talks, Muzorewa was an outspoken critic of the brutal methods used by the regime's police, army and airforce to suppress popular support for the liberation struggle. But today, he and his colleagues in the "government of ZimbabweRhodesia" do not simply argue that the security forces have been brought under their control, but that they have somehow undergone a far-reaching change in character and have emerged as a "army of the people", responsive to, and ready to defend, the interests of the Zimbabwean people as a whole. Part of the purpose of this publication is to examine the truth of this claim. Bishop Muzorewa's present position is not, however, a particularly surprising one, in the light of the role that the Rhodesian security forces have always played in defending the colonial system. From the earliest days of white conquest, Rhodesia enjoyed a significantly different status from that of Britain's other African colonies, in that the white settlers were able to build up and control their own police, army and airforce. As such, the security forces have always been the guarantee of white power and privilege. For decades they have been responsible for enforcing a mass of racist and exploitative laws and practices, and for suppressing African opposition to colonial rule, both through peaceful means and in recent years through the armed liberation struggle. They have committed crimes in clear contravention of the Geneva Conventions on the international laws of war, and against all basic tenets of human rights. (See for example the publications of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, the International Defence and Aid Fund for Southern Africa and the Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace in Rhodesia). The fact that the Salisbury regime, by mounting bombing raids and commando strikes, is today able to bully and intimidate the population not only of Zimbabwe but of the front line states, owes much to decisions which were taken by the British government at the time of the break-up of the Central African Federation in 1963. During the period of the Federation, responsibility for the defence of the three territories (Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia - now Zambia, and Nyasaland - now Malawi) was exercised by the Federal government. The Rhodesian Light Infantry, for example, now the main all-white unit within the Rhodesian army, started life in 1961 as a Federal force deployed on Zambia's northern border (see THE ARMY). In June 1963, a conference convened by the British government at Victoria Falls to plan and implement the dissolution of the Federation formally decided that when the Federal government ceased to exercise responsibility for defence, the position should revert to that which obtained before 1953 - i.e. when Southern Rhodesia had responsibility for its own defence and Britain had operational control of the forces in the other territories. In practice, however, and in consequence of subsequent manoeuvres in Salisbury involving British and Southern Rhodesian government officials, most of the Federal forces were handed over to the white Rhodesian settlers. This deal, under which powerful and well-equipped military forces were handed over lock, stock and barrel to a government which was clearly committed to white supremacy and racist exploitation, provoked a storm of protest internationally. The arrangements meant that the white settlers ended up with much more than they had originally put into the Federal defence pool. The Federal air force, in particular, comprising Canberra bombers, Hunter fighters and Alouette helicopters, was one of the most advanced in Africa at the time. The widespread concern that these forces would be used not only to suppress the Zimbabwean population but also to terrorize neighbouring states was expressed in a Security Council resolution of 13 September 1963 calling upon Britain "not to transfer to its colony of Southern Rhodesia the armed forces and aircraft as envisaged by the Central Africa conference of 1963". In response, Britain used its Security Council veto for the first time since the Suez crisis in 1956 -thereby also rejecting a Security Council appeal not to transfer to the white settlers "any powers or attributes of sovereignty until the establishment of a government fully representative of all the inhabitants of the colony". The British permanent representative at the United Nations denied that the situation in Southern Rhodesia represented "a threat to peace and security" and dismissed fears about the use to which the white settlers would put their air force as "irrelevant, untrue and wildest flights of the imagination". He also assured the Security Council that the British government would retain control of the use of Southern Rhodesia's forces outside the frontiers of Zimbabwe for as long as Britain's responsibility in relation to Southern Rhodesia remained unchanged. (Elaine Windrich, Britain and the Politics of Rhodesian Independence, Croom Helm 1978, pp. 15- 16). In practice, events nave proved the majority of United Nations member states right, and the Rhodesian security forces, strengthened through regular sanctions-busting injections of military hardware and spares, have developed to a point where they are now violating international borders on a daily basis. The role of the Rhodesian security forces has not essentially changed under the 'internal settlement' agreement of 3 March 1978. Bishop Muzorewa and those other African personalities who have been coopted into the regime are well aware that military superiority remains crucial to their survival. For this reason, it continues to be safe to assume, as the AntiApartheid Movement pointed out in 1978, that "if there is any area in which the regime will not be prepared to compromise it is that of its security forces".
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Royal Banners 1199–Present
    British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Geoff Parsons & Michael Faul Abstract The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. It continues to show how King Edward III added the French Royal Arms, consequent to his claim to the French throne. There is then the change from “France Ancient” to “France Modern” by King Henry IV in 1405, which set the pattern of the arms and the standard for the next 198 years. The story then proceeds to show how, over the ensuing 234 years, there were no fewer than six versions of the standard until the adoption of the present pattern in 1837. The presentation includes pictures of all the designs, noting that, in the early stages, the arms appeared more often as a surcoat than a flag. There is also some anecdotal information regarding the various patterns. Anne (1702–1714) Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 799 British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Figure 1 Introduction The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. Although we often refer to these flags as Royal Standards, strictly speaking, they are not standard but heraldic banners which are based on the Coats of Arms of the British Monarchs. Figure 2 William I (1066–1087) The first use of the coats of arms would have been exactly that, worn as surcoats by medieval knights.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe.Pdf
    THE S.A. ' "!T1!TE OF INTERNATIONAL AFi -! NOT "(C :.-_ .^ FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE Ah Analysis of the 1980 Elections and an Assessment of the Prospects Martyn Gregory OCCASIONAL. PAPER GELEEIMTHEIOSPUBUKASIE DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE INSTITUUT MN INTERNASIONALE AANGELEENTHEDE THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Martyn Gregory* the author of this report, is a postgraduate research student,at Leicester University in Britain, working on # : thesis, entitled "International Politics of the Conflict in Rhodesia". He recently spent two months in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, : during the pre- and post-election period, as a Research Associate at the University of Rhodesia (now the University of Zimbabwe). He travelled widely throughout the country and interviewed many politicians, officials and military personnel. He also spent two weeks with the South African Institute of International Affairs at Smuts House in Johannesburg. The author would like to thank both, the University of Zimbabwe and the Institute for assistance in the preparation of this report, as well as the British Social Science Research Council which financed his visit to Rhodesia* The Institute wishes to express its appreciation to Martyn Gregory for his co-operation and his willingness to prepare this detailed report on the Zimbabwe elections and their implications for publication by the Institute. It should be noted that any opinions expressed in this report are the responsibility of the author and not of the Institute. FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE: an analysis of the 1980 elections and an assessment of the prospects Martyn Gregory Contents Introduction .'. Page 1 Paving the way to Lancaster House .... 1 The Ceasefire Arrangement 3 Organization of the Elections (i) Election Machinery 5 (i i) Voting Systems 6 The White Election 6 The Black Election (i) Contesting Parties 7 (ii) Manifestos and the Issues .
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Patriotic Front in the Independence of Zimbabwe, 1976
    Z THE ROLE OF THE PATRIOTIC FRONT IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF ZIMBABWE 1976-1980 by NTHATHEDZENI NICHOLAS DANGALE Presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MAGISTER ARTIUM in HISTORY in the FACULTY OF ARTS at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY JOHANNESBURG PROMOTER: 1996 PROFESSOR H J VAN ASWEGEN DEDICATION Dedicated to my mother, who spent every cent she had to put me through school. May God bless you. _____,,..-----D- .0G--6=■. ii. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to my wife, Asnath Maano, and my two children, Urangani and Ipfi, who gave me unqualified support throughout my years of study; to Prof H J van Aswegen, who tirelessly made this mini-dissertation a success and to my friend Dr Deon Gouws, who always encouraged me to work hard. OPSOMMING (SUMMARY) Hierdie mini-verhandeling beskryf die rol van die Patriotiese Front in die bevryding van Zimbabwe tussen 1976 en 1980. Die presidente van die frontlinie-state het 'n beroep gedoen op die twee Zimbabwiese nasionalisteleiers, Joshua Nkomo van ZAPU en Robert Mugabe van ZANU, om 'n alliansie te vorm sodat hulle met 'n verenigde front die regime van Ian Smith kon pak. Hierdie alliansie het op 9 Oktober 1976 tot stand gekom, met die seen van die presidente van die frontlinie-state. Die alliansie het ekonomiese, militere en politieke steun geniet van die internasionale gemeenskap, die OAE en die frontlinie-state, en is beskou as die enigste mondstuk van die verdrukte massas Afrikane in Zimbabwe. Die leiers van die PF het, nieteenstaande verskille in ideologie, dieselfde oogmerke nagestreef. Hulle wou albei Zimbabwe bevry van die Ian Smith-regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Condottieri
    The post-fordist military: an inquiry into the political economy of private military comparnies. Author Fulloon, Mark Published 2013 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Humanities DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3821 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367776 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE POST-FORDIST MILITARY: An Inquiry into the Political Economy of Private Military Companies Mark Andrew Fulloon Bachelor of Arts (Hons) Class 1 PhD Candidate Faculty of Arts School of Humanities Griffith University, Nathan Campus Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date Submitted: 1st March 2011 Why have private military companies become increasingly significant in post-Fordist period particularly since the end of the Cold War? i “It is assumed that men fight for a cause, that they are actuated by a love of home, devotion to the country, or attachment to a sovereign; these are the sentiments that are considered to be hallowed in the pursuit of arms…” (Richard Cobden)1 1 This quote was given during the parliamentary debates of 1854-1856 on the decision whether to send mercenaries to the Crimean War on behalf of the British Empire. See Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 1854-1856, 3rd series edition, Volume CXXXVI, Cornelius Buck, London, Col. 668. ii Preface The rise and dominance of private military companies (PMCs) have become key factors in a number of conflicts since the end of the Cold War. This thesis is concerned about how the growth of PMCs is related to the changing modes of production from Fordism to post-Fordism.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Cultures, Shadow Histories Foreign Military Personnel in Africa 1960–1980
    Shadow Cultures, Shadow Histories Foreign Military Personnel in Africa 1960–1980 William Jeffrey Cairns Anderson A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand November 2011 Abstract From the 1960s to the 1980s mercenary soldiers in Africa captured the attention of journalists, authors and scholars. This thesis critically examines the shadows of mercenarism in sub-Saharan Africa during decolonisation – an intense period of political volatility, fragility and violence. The shadows of conflict are spaces fuelled by forces of power where defined boundaries of illegal/legal, illicit/licit and legitimate/illegitimate become obscured. Nordstrom (2000, 2001, 2004, 2007) invokes the shadows as a substantive ethnographic and analytical concept in anthropological research. This thesis considers how the shadows are culturally, socially and politically contingent spaces where concepts of mercenarism are contested. Specific attention is given to ‘shadow agents’ – former foreign military combatants, diplomats and politicians – whose lived experiences shed light on the power, ambiguities and uncertainties of the shadows. Arguing the importance of mixed method ethnography, this thesis incorporates three bodies of anthropological knowledge. Material from the official state archives of New Zealand and the United Kingdom (UK) where, amongst themselves, politicians and diplomats debated the ‘mercenary problem’, are used alongside oral testimonies from former foreign soldiers whose individual stories provide important narratives omitted from official records. This ethnography also draws on multi-sited fieldwork, including participant observation in Africa, the UK and New Zealand that engages with and captures the more intimate details of mercenary soldiering. As findings suggest, the worlds of diplomacy, politics and mercenarism are composed of shadow cultures where new perspectives and understandings emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • SADF Military Operations
    SADF Military Operations 1975 -1989 Contents 1 List of operations of the South African Border War 1 2 Operation Savannah (Angola) 3 2.1 Background .............................................. 3 2.2 Military intervention .......................................... 4 2.2.1 Support for UNITA and FNLA ................................ 5 2.2.2 Ruacana-Calueque occupation ................................ 5 2.2.3 Task Force Zulu ........................................ 5 2.2.4 Cuban intervention ...................................... 6 2.2.5 South African reinforcements ................................. 6 2.2.6 End of South African advance ................................ 6 2.3 Major battles and incidents ...................................... 6 2.3.1 Battle of Quifangondo .................................... 7 2.3.2 Battle of Ebo ......................................... 7 2.3.3 “Bridge 14” .......................................... 7 2.3.4 Battle of Luso ......................................... 7 2.3.5 Battles involving Battlegroup Zulu in the west ........................ 8 2.3.6 Ambrizete incident ...................................... 8 2.4 Aftermath ............................................... 8 2.5 South African order of battle ..................................... 9 2.6 Association .............................................. 9 2.7 Further reading ............................................ 9 2.8 References ............................................... 9 3 Operation Bruilof 13 3.1 Background .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies
    Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton Abstract The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Con- gress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvan- tages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of clas- sification for books in these fields, continues to “other” the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.1 Introduction The neat division of knowledge into tidy silos of scholarly disciplines, each with its own section of a knowledge organization system (KOS), has long characterized the efforts of libraries to arrange their collections of books. The KOS most commonly used in American academic libraries is the Li- brary of Congress Classification (LCC). LCC, developed between 1899 and 1903 by James C. M. Hanson and Charles Martel, is based on the work of Charles Ammi Cutter. Cutter devised his “Expansive Classification” to em- body the universe of human knowledge within twenty-seven classes, while Hanson and Martel eventually settled on twenty (Chan 1999, 6–12). Those classes tend to mirror the names of academic departments then prevail- ing in colleges and universities (e.g., Philosophy, History, Medicine, and Agriculture).
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the US Department of State Documents Collection, 2010
    Description of document: Index to the US Department of State Documents Collection, 2010 Requested date: 13-May-2010 Released date: 03-December-2010 Posted date: 09-May-2011 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Officer Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL US Department of State Washington, D. C. 20522-8100 Fax: 202-261-8579 Notes: This index lists documents the State Department has released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) The number in the right-most column on the released pages indicates the number of microfiche sheets available for each topic/request The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Puuns 1 9 7 8 0 0 1 Vol 1
    S/1 2529/Rev.1 S/1 2529/Rev.1 TENTH REPORT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED IN PURSUANCE OF RESOLUTION 253 (1968) CONCERNING THE QUESTION OF SOUTHERN RHODESIA SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-THIRD YEAH SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT No. 2 Volume I UNITED NATIONS New York, 1978 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol SI...) are normally published in quarterly Supplements of the Official Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which information about it is riven. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. S/12529/Rev.l CONTENTS VOLUME I INTRODUCTION........................... Chapter I. WORK OF THE COMMITTEE ................... Paragraphs 1-3 4 - 102 A. Organization and programme of work ... ........... ...5 - 24 (a) Working procedures ...... ................ .. 7 - 15 (b) Consideration of general subjects .. ......... ...16 - 24 B. Consideration of cases carried over from previous reports and new cases concerning possible violation of sanctions ......... ....................... ...25 - 98 (a) General cases ....... ................... ...31 - 86 (b) Cases opened on the basis of information supplied by individuals and non-governmental organizations (Case No. INGO-) ...... ................. ...87 - 93 (c) Imports of chrome, nickel and other materials from Southern Rhodesia into the United States of America (Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Defence Industry 2006
    November 2006 South Africa’s Defence Industry 2006 Defence Contents November 2006 Defining the defence-related industries 3 The development of South Africa’s defence-related industries 4 Nature and structure of South Africa’s defence-related industries 8 – Industry players 8 – Nature and structure of the defence industry 9 – Defence budget 10 – Defence exports and imports 11 – Employment 14 – International partnerships 15 – Civilian technology 16 – Diversification 16 – Black economic empowerment (BEE) 17 Strategic defence acquisition package 18 – The contracts 19 • The Gripen contract 19 • The Hawk contract 19 • The light utility helicopter contract 19 • The Corvette contract 20 • The submarine contract 20 • The maritime patrol helicopter contract 21 – Industrial participation requirements of the deal 21 • Hawk and Gripen offsets 23 • Helicopter offsets 26 • Corvette offsets 27 • Submarine offsets 28 • Maritime helicopter offsets 29 – Evaluation of the offset deals 30 Main participants 34 – Armscor 34 – Denel 38 – Saab Grintek 44 – Reunert 47 www.researchchannel.co.za Defence Contents November 2006 – Advanced Technologies and Engineering (ATE) 48 – African Defence Systems (ADS) 49 – Land Systems OMC (formerley known as Alvis OMC) 49 – Tellumat 50 Main sources 52 www.researchchannel.co.za Defence November 2006 List of abbreviations ADS – African Defence Systems AISI – Aerospace Industry Support Initiative AMS – Aerospace Monitoring & Systems ATE – Advanced Technologies & Engineering AMD – African Aerospace, Maritime and Defence Industries
    [Show full text]
  • American Friends Service Commitiee International Division Southern Africa International Affairs Report
    AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITIEE INTERNATIONAL DIVISION SOUTHERN AFRICA INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS REPORT Letter No. 12 from Ted Lockwood July 27, 1985 Af: AFSC' e Southern Afri~& Int6"'·ii8.tioiial Affairs Representative, Edgar (Ted) Lockwood carries responsibility for writing reports, initiating conferences, seminars, and personal contacts that support the work of the member nations of the Southern Africa Development Coordination Conference (SADCC) in fosterlng greater regional development and economic coopera­ tion. To be included on the mailing list, write to AFSC, Africa Programs at 1501 Cherry Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102. Contributions to defray mailing and duplicating costs are welcome. NOTE: The text of this letter refers to two political parties, both named ZANU. ZANU-PF (Patriotic Front)refers to the ruling party headed by Prime Minister Robert Mugabe. ZANU refers to the minori ty party, headed by Ndabiningi Sithole, which split from ZANU-PF prior to the independence. UANC, the United African Na tional Un ion, headed by Bishop Abel Muzorewa, and ZAPU, the Zimbabwe African Peoples Union, headed by Joshua Nkomo, both minorit~ parties, are also mentioned. De",,!" Friendf:, A politician I once knew used to say, "There is nothing I hate more than surprises." Surprises can be nasty shocks to our preconceived notions. They illustrate our inability to read how others, especially those of another group, another race, another class, are actually feeling and thinking. But surprises can also be happy surprises when things go much better than we could have imagined they would. Zimbabwe's elections had both kinds of surprises. The nasty shock was Ian Smith's winning of 75% of the 20 "white seats" in Parliament, a win that has caused more explanations, letters to the editor of the Harare Herald and general furore than any topic in a long time.
    [Show full text]