DOCSLIB.ORG

The Fall of Srebrenica, Report of the UN Secretary-General 15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Fall of Srebrenica, Report of the UN Secretary-General 15 r.,..,.,., .. '"'""'" ·--··------·-·--·~~------~--------------. United Nations _A;54;549 Distr.: General ~) General Assembly 15 November 1999 ~ ~ Original: English Fifty-fourth session Agenda item 42 The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina 00907954 Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to General Assembly resolution 53/35 The fall of Srebrenica Contents I. Introduction 1 9 6 IL Background I 0 -40 8 !\. Break-up of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the establishment of the United Nations Protection Force .................. I 0 14 8 B. Independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the outbreak of war ....... 15 19 9 C. Humanitarian activities ........................................... 20 ·23 9 D. Proposals for a peacekeeping mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina ....... 24 28 10 ~ ") E. The peace process ................................................ 29 -'- 11 I-'. Srebrenirn prior to the sati.: area resolutions .......................... 33 40 13 [ 11. Adoption of Security Counci I resolutions 8 19 ( 1993 ), 824 ( 1993) and 836 ( 1993) 41 · I 02 16 A. Minimal consensus within the Security Council ....................... 41-44 16 B. The concept of safe areas .......................................... 45 51 16 C. Security Counci I resolution 819 ( 1993) .............................. 52-58 18 D. Srebrenica demilitarization agreement of 18 April 1993 ................ 59 62 19 E. Security Council mission to Srebrenica and further demilitarization agreement of 8 May 1993 63-65 19 99-34876 (EJ 271199 I llll II Ill II Ill 111111111111111111111111111111 A/54/549 F. Security Council resolution 824 ( 1993) 66-69 20 G. End of the Vance-Owen Peace Plan: moves to strengthen the safe area regime .......................................................... 70-77 21 H. Security Council resolution 836 (1993) 78-79 22 L Positions of Security Council members on resolution 836 ( 1993) ........ 80-92 --'T' J. Reluctance to use force to deter attacks on safe areas ............ 93-95 25 K. Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to resolution 836 ( 1993) (S/25939) ....................................................... 96-98 26 L. Efforts to lift the arms embargo 99 102 26 IV. Evolution of the safe area policy: June 1993-December 1994 103-174 29 A. Initial implementation of the safe area policy ......................... 103-105 29 B. Mount lgman crisis ............................................... I 06-113 29 C. Proposals to exchange Srebrenica and Zepa for Serb-held territory around Sarajevo ........................................................ 114-116 30 117- 123 31 D. Markale massacre and disagreements on the use of air power ........... ,, E. United Nations assessment of the safe area policy as of March 1994 ..... 124 130 _,_ F. Attack on Gorazde: March-April 1994 .............................. 131 ·· 145 34 G. Report ofthe Secretary-General of9 May 1994 (S/!994/555) ........... 146 152 36 H. Contact Group peace plan . .................................. 153-156 37 I. Serb assault on the safe area of Bihac: October-December 1994 ......... 157 163 38 J. Report of the Secretary-General of I December 1994 (S/1994/13 89) ..... 164 174 39 V. Events of January-June 1995 ............................................ 175 225 44 A. Cessation of hostilities agreement and its collapse 175-184 44 B. Air strikes around Sarajevo ........................................ 185-189 45 C. United Nations Protection Force hostage crisis ....................... 190-200 46 D. Report of the Secretary-General of 30 May 1995 (S/1995/444) .......... 201-209 48 E. Bosniac attempt to break the siege of Sarajevo and its consequences for the United Nations ................................................ 210-212 49 F. Rapid reaction force ......... 213 220 49 G. Fighting around Srebrenica ........................................ 221 225 51 VI. Overview of deployment in Srebrenica: February-July 1995 226 238 53 VIL Fall of Srebrenica: 6-1 I July 1995 ....................................... 239-317 57 A. 6 July: attack on observation post Foxtrot: request for close air support ... 239 245 57 B. 7 July: pause in Serb attack ...................................... 246 249 58 c. 8 July: request for close air support discouraged; Bosnian Serb Army overruns observation post Foxtrot: ARBiH kill Dutchbat soldier 250 261 59 2 00907955 A/54/549 D. 9 July: events leading to blocking position and warning to Serbs . 262-276 61 E. I 0 July: Bosnian Serb Army violates warning; use of close air support deferred . 277-296 63 F. 11 July: initial confusion over air support; Srebrenica falls . 297-317 67 VIII. Aftermath of the fall ofSrebrenica: 12-20 July 1995 . 318-393 72 A. 12 July: meetings with Mladic; deportation commences . 318-328 72 B. 12 July: Security Council resolution 1004 (l 995) . 329-339 75 C. Night of 12 July: sporadic killing begins . 340-345 76 D. 13 July: killing of hundreds of unarmed men and boys begins . 346-360 77 E. 14 July: mass executions commence; European Union negotiator meets Milo~evic and Mladic . 361-374 80 F. 15 July: massacres continue; agreement reached between Mladic and the United Nations Protection Force . 375-382 82 G. 16-18 July: reports of atrocities begin to surface . 383-390 83 H. 19 July: Mladic and United Nations Protection Force Commander meet again and conclude agreement . 391-393 85 IX. Fall ofZepa and the new safe area policy: July-October 1995 . 394-464 87 A. Preparations for the attack on Zepa: 11-14 July 1995 . 394-396 87 B. Attack, resistance and negotiations in Zepa: 14-20 July 1995 . 397-402 87 C. First formal reports of atrocities from Srebrenica . 403-404 88 D. London meeting and changes in the approach to the use of air strikes . 405-410 89 E. Operational arrangements resulting from the London meeting . 411-414 90 F. Fall ofZepa and the flight to Serbia . 415-431 90 G. Operation Storm and the United States-led peace initiative . 432-437 93 H. Attack on Markale marketplace in Sarajevo . 438-441 94 I. Operation Deliberate Force . 442-445 95 J. Serb assessment ofOperatiQn Deliberate Force . 446-447 95 K. Pause; a new peace map; opening a road into Sarajevo . 448-450 96 L. Resumption of air and ground attacks . 451-455 97 M. United States-led peace initiative; concerns about the mandate . 456-459 98 N. Croatian offensive and the end of hostilities . 460-464 99 X. Peacekeeping and the Peace Agreement: October-December 1995 . 465-466 I 00 XI. The fall of Srebrenica: an assessment . 467-506 I 02 A. Role of the United Nations Protection Force in Srebrenica . 470-474 102 B. Role ofBosniac forces on the ground . 475-479 103 00907956 3 A/54/549 C. Role of air power . 480-483 104 D. Unanswered questions . 484-487 I 04 E. Role of the Security Council and Member States.... 488-493 105 F. Failure to fully comprehend the Serb war aims . 494-497 106 G. Lessons for the future . 498-506 107 Annexes I. Senior United Nations personnel in the former Yugoslavia referred to in the report by their titles . 110 II. Individuals interviewed in the preparation of the report . 111 Maps The former Yugoslavia . 5 Vance-Owen Peace Plan (January 1993) . 15 Safe areas designated under Security Council resolution 824 (1993) . 28 Union of three republics plan (August 1993) . 42 Contact Group peace plan (July 1994) . 43 Dutchbat deployment around Srebrenica (June 1995) 56 Bosnian Serb Army attack on Srebrenica (July 1995) 71 Execution sites and mass graves . 86 Inter-entity boundary line established by the Dayton Peace Agreement . 10 l t--. L .. ) c:-. r, c:.; C'\ CJ C) 4 THE FORMER VisD YUGOSLAVIA D International boundary Republic boundary Autonomous province boundary 0 National capital . ADRIA TIC SEA ® Adm1m. "strative capital ·--- Railroad Principal road --- Secondary road 0 5-0 '100 150km 0 5-0 41' 13° 18' 19' 4131 United Nations ~~~e:::'ber 1999 A/54/549 I. Introduction I . This report is submitted pursuant to paragraph 18 of Nations failed to deter the Serb attack on Srebrenica and the General Assembly resolution 53/35 of 30 November 1998. appalling events that followed. In that paragraph, the General Assembly requested: 4. In my effort to get closer to the truth, I have returned "a comprehensive report, including an assessment, on to the origins of the safe area policy, discussing the the events dating from the establishment of the safe evolution of that policy over a period of several years. I have area of Srebrenica on 16 April 1993 under Security drawn the attention of the reader to the resolutions of the Council resolution 819 (1993) ofl6 April 1993, which Security Council and to the resources made available to was followed by the establishment of other safe areas, implement those resolutions; I have reviewed how the policy until the endorsement of the Peace Agreement by the was implemented on the ground, as well as the attacks that Security Council under resolution 1031 (1995) of 15 took place on other safe areas: Sarajevo, Goraide, Bihac. I December 1995, bearing in mind the relevant decisions have ·reviewed the debate that took place within the of the Security Council and the proceedings of the international community on the use of force and, in International Tribunal in this respect," particular, on the use of air power by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). I have also reviewed the role and encourages Member States and others concerned to ofUNPROFOR in the fall of Srebrenica, and in the almost­ provide relevant information. forgotten case ofZepa. Finally, I recall how, having failed "' "' "' to act decisively during all of these events, the international 2. On 16 November 1995, the International Tribunal for community found a new will after the fall of Srebrenica and the Former Yugoslavia indicted Radovan Karadzic how, after the last Serb attack on the safe area of Sarajevo, ("President of the Republika Srpska") and Ratko Mladic a concerted military operation was launched to ensure that (Commander of the Bosnian Serb Army) for their alleged no such attacks would take place again. direct responsibility for the atrocities committed in July 1995 5. In reviewing these events, I have in no way sought to against the Bosnian Muslim population of the United deflect criticism directed at the United Nations Secretariat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gotovina Et Al Judgement Volume II
    IT-06-90-T 38520 D38520 - D37937 International Tribunal for the UNITED Case No. IT-06-90-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for NATIONS Serious Violations of International Date: 15 April 2011 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Original: English since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Uldis Ėinis Judge Elizabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr John Hocking Judgement of: 15 April 2011 PROSECUTOR v. ANTE GOTOVINA IVAN ČERMAK MLADEN MARKAČ PUBLIC ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT VOLUME II OF II ______________________________________________________________________ Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for Ante Gotovina Mr Alan Tieger Mr Luka Mišetić Mr Stefan Waespi Mr Gregory Kehoe Ms Prashanti Mahindaratne Mr Payam Akhavan Ms Katrina Gustafson Mr Edward Russo Counsel for Ivan Čermak Mr Saklaine Hedaraly Mr Ryan Carrier Mr Steven Kay, QC Ms Gillian Higgins Counsel for Mladen Markač Mr Goran Mikuličić Mr Tomislav Kuzmanović 38519 Table of contents General abbreviations 7 1. Introduction 9 2. Sources and use of evidence 13 3. The Accused 37 3.1 Ante Gotovina and the Split Military District 37 3.1.1 Position of Ante Gotovina within the Split Military District 37 3.1.2 Ante Gotovina's powers as a commander 52 3.2 Ivan Čermak and the Knin garrison 73 3.3 Mladen Markač and the Special Police 86 4. Crimes committed in municipalities (July-September 1995) 105 4.1 Murders 105 4.1.1 Overview of the charges 105 4.1.2 Benkovac municipality 106 4.1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Link MONUMENTA SREBRENICA Knjiga 8.Pdf
    MONUMENTA SREBRENICA Istraživanja, dokumenti, svjedočanstva KNJIGA 8. SREBRENICA KROZ MINULA STOLJEĆA SREBRENICA KROZ MINULA STOLJEĆA Recenzenti: Prof. dr. sc. Jusuf Žiga Akademik prof. dr. sc. Enver Halilović Prof. dr. sc. Sead Selimović Prof. dr. sc. Anita Petrović Prof. dr. Edin Mutapčić Urednik: Prof. dr. sc. Adib Đozić Lektor: Zarfa Sarajlić, prof. Prijevod na engleski: Prof. dr. sc. Selma Kešetović Izdavač: JU Zavod za zaštitu i korištenje kulturno-historijskog i prirodnog naslijeđa Tuzlanskog kantona Štampa: OFF-SET Tuzla Tiraž: 500 kom Tuzla – Srebrenica 2019. ISSN 2233-162X 2 SADRŽAJ Riječ urednika ............................................................................................... 5 GENOCID Sabina Subašić-Galijatović, KRIVIČNA ODGOVORNOST U PRAKSI MEĐUNARODNOG KRIVIČNOG SUDA ZA BIVŠU JUGOSLAVIJU ................................ 15 Meldijana Arnaut-Haseljić GENOCID U SREBRENICI: UDRUŽENI ZLOČINAČKI PODUHVAT ................................................................................ 35 Dževad Mahmutović HRONOLOGIJA SUDSKOG PROCESA RADOVANU KARADŽIĆU ZA ZLOČIN GENOCIDA U SREBRENICI I OSTALE ZLOČINE ................ 53 Ermin Kuka LOGORI I MJESTA NEZAKONITOG ZATOČENJA BOŠNJAKA NA PODRUČJU VIŠEGRADA U PERIODU AGRESIJE 1992–1995. GODINE ................................................................................................. 81 Rasim Muratović, Midhat Čaušević RAZUMIJEVANJE OPROSTA U DJELU NORVEŠKOG FILOZOFA ARNEA JOHANA VETLESENA ........................................................... 105 AKTUELNE PRAVNE
    [Show full text]
  • Skupština Opštine Srebrenica Odluke, Zaključci, Programi I Javni Konkursi
    BILTEN SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA BROJ: 1/2015 Srebrenica, Januar 2015. god. SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE, ZAKLJUČCI, PROGRAMI I JAVNI KONKURSI Broj:01-022-185 /14 ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. Broj:01-022-184/14 Na osnovu člana 31. Zakona o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske Srebrenica, 26.12.2014. god. ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12 ), a u skladu sa Zakonom o trezoru ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 16/05 i Na osnovu člana 5. Zakona o Budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske 92/09) i člana 30. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 121/12), člana 30. Zakona Republike Srpske", broj: 101/04, 42/05, 118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), o lokalnoj samoupravi ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 101/04, 42/05,118/05 i 98/13) i člana 32. Statuta Opštine Srebrenica 26.12.2014. godine je usvojila: ("Bilten opštine Srebrenica", broj: 10/05), Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj 26.12.2014. godine je Odluku usvojila: o izvršenju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Odluku Član 1. o usvajanju Budžeta opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu Ovom Odlukom propisuje se način izvršenja Budžeta Opštine Član 1. Srebrenica za 2015. godinu (u daljem tekstu: budžet). Budžet opštine Srebrenica za 2015. godinu sastoji se od: Ova Odluka će se sprovoditi u saglasnosti sa Zakonom o budžetskom sistemu Republike Srpske i Zakonom o trezoru. 1. Ukupni prihodi i primici: 6.883.00000 KM, od toga: a) Redovni prihodi tekućeg perioda: 6.115.500,00 KM; Sve Odluke, zaključci i rješenja koji se odnose na budžet moraju biti u b) Tekući grantovi i donacije: 767.500,00 KM.
    [Show full text]
  • The Principle of State Sovereignty and the Right to Self-Determination: the Case of Kosovo1
    The Principle of State Sovereignty and the Right to Self-determination:... 47 The Principle of State Sovereignty and the Right to Self-determination: The Case of Kosovo1 Uroš Lipušček* Abstract Sovereignty and self-determination are two basic norms of international law which often appear in contradiction to each other. The main debate here is which principle limits the other and the answer depends on an evaluation of each case. The case of Kosovo is a classic example of this dilemma. Both sides, Kosovo Albanian and Serb, claim their own rights based mainly on historical arguments, the former the right to self- determination in the form of their own state and the latter the right to retain the province of Kosovo under the framework of Serbia. Historical arguments or historical rights are an outdated concept. The modern concept of self-determination, developed from Woodrow Wilson’s theory which is linked to democracy, allows Kosovo Albanians the right to external self-determination. Sovereignty of the state does not exist as an absolute concept anymore, since it is directly linked to respect of basic human rights. Even that the self determination can not derive to a consistent international legal order, Kosovo Albanians have the right to external self- determination and their own state, since they were severely oppressed by the Milosević regime. Self-determination remains a radical concept to this day, one which can only be applied on a case by case basis and by taking into account of various factors. * Uroš Lipušček, PhD, Rector of AAB
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia Doesn’T Work 15 Michael Schmunk
    Table of Contents Foreword by the Editors 5 Ernst M. Felberbauer, Predrag Jureković and Frederic Labarre Welcome Speech 7 Johann Pucher PART I: OVERCOMING POLITICAL OBSTACLES, FACING ECONOMIC CHALLENGES 13 A Country with Several Nations, but Without a Proper State? Why Bosnia Doesn’t Work 15 Michael Schmunk Multiple Faces of the Bosnian ”Crisis Circle”: Ethnonationalism and Ethnopolitics in Post-Dayton-Bosnia and their Effects on Democratization 31 Vedran Džihić PART II: REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL FACTORS OF INFLUENCE 55 Bosnia: Hostage of Belgrade 57 Sonja Biserko The Regional Cooperation Council’s Role 63 Alphan Solen NATO and Reform in Bosnia-Herzegovina 67 Bruce McLane PART III: RELEVANT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SECURITY SECTOR 77 The Challenge of Reaching Self Sustainability in a Post-War Environment 79 Denis Hadžović 3 The Next Step in Defence Reform: Establishing a Military Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina 91 Heinz Vetschera The Religious Radicalism and its Impact on the Security Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina 113 Velko Attanassoff Recent Developments in Fighting Organized Crime in Bosnia- Herzegovina 131 Stephen Alexander Goddard PART IV: SOCIAL BARRIERS AND WAYS OF DEALING WITH THEM 145 Lessons of Peacebuilding for the Balkans and Beyond: Towards a Culture of Dialogue, Reconciliation and Transformation 147 Dennis J.D. Sandole The Role of Media in the Process of Peace-Building 177 Drago Pilsel The Role of Education for Sustainable Peace-Building 183 Wolfgang Benedek PART VI: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 205 Conclusions and Recommendations 207 Predrag Jureković List of Authors and Editors 217 4 Foreword by the Editors Bosnia and Herzegovina in almost 14 years of the post-Dayton period has not become a functional state despite some successes that have been achieved in regard to the Euro-Atlantic integration processes.
    [Show full text]
  • BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA Copyright © UNDP 2009, All Rights Reserved
    ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTSBOSNIA AND EVALUATION OF UNDP CONTRIBUTION HerZEGovina Evaluation Office, May 2009 United Nations Development Programme REPORTS PUBLISHED UNDER THE ADR SERIES Afghanistan Jamaica Argentina Jordan Bangladesh Lao PDR Barbados Montenegro Benin Mozambique Bhutan Nicaragua Bosnia & Herzegovina Nigeria Botswana Rwanda Bulgaria Serbia China Sudan Colombia Syrian Arab Republic Republic of the Congo Tajikistan Egypt Ukraine Ethiopia Uzbekistan Guatemala Turkey Honduras Viet Nam India Yemen EVALUATION TEAM Team Leader Evelyn Bazalgette Team Members Alain Thery Ozren Runic EO Task Manager and Team Member Vijayalakshmi Vadivelu EO Research Assistant Tega Shivute ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS: BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Copyright © UNDP 2009, all rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by UNDP and reflects the views of its authors. Design: Green Communication Design inc. FOREWORD The Evaluation Office of the United Nations faces numerous challenges, including tackling Development Programme (UNDP) conducts poverty, reducing unemployment, strengthening independent evaluations of UNDP contributions the capacities of public management institu- to development results through its country pro- tions, controlling fiscal deficit and harmonizing grammes. These evaluations are titled Assessment complex administrative structures. of Development Results (ADR). An ADR evalu- ates the relevance and strategic positioning of The international community, including the UNDP support and contributions to a coun- various UN agencies, have played an important try’s development over a specified period of role in the country’s reconstruction and develop- time.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Villages of the Srebrenica Region Reduced to Ashes
    Milivoje Ivanisevic SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES Institute for Research on the Suffering of the Serbs in XX c. Belgrade, 2010. SERBIAN VILLAGES OF THE SREBRENICA REGION REDUCED TO ASHES This presentation of the crimes committed by the Muslims against the Serbian people of Central Podrinje is just a fraction of the entire pogrom of the Serbian population in that region throughout the war. The destruction of Serb settlements and their cultural and religious institutions in that region bear wounds, which have evidently not yet been healed. According to one of the several hundred important documents of the BiH Army in our possession, the following has been stated: “ At the end of January or beginning of February in 1993, within the Zone of Responsibility of the 8th OG (Operating Group, author’s remark), a vast, linked, free territory had been formed, with its centre in Srebrenica, covering 95% of the Srebrenica municipality, 90% of the Bratunac municipality, 60% of the Vlasenica municipality, and 50 % of the territory of the Zvornik municipality. Furthermore, a direct physical link with the liberated villages of the Zepa region was established.” 1 By that time (at the end of January or the beginning of February in 1993), according to the same document, in the above listed municipalities, the Muslims had occupied an area of more than 850 km2 of the entire territory. Their undisputed military success had nearly resulted in the complete extermination of the many Serb settlements in the aforementioned municipalities and had also produced much tribulation amongst the inhabitants of Serb nationality.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategije Razvoja Opštine Srebrenica Za Period 2018. – 2022.Godine
    Strategije razvoja opštine Srebrenica za period 2018. – 2022.godine 1. Mladen Grujičić 2. Dušica Kovačević 3. Mela Karić 4. Hasudin Mustafić 5. Bojan Pejić Srebrenica, 2017. godine I -UVOD Slika 1: Geografski položaj opštine Srebrenica Izvor: Odjeljenje za prostorno uređene i stambeno komunalne poslove, Opština Srebrenica 1.1. Geografski položaj i opšti podaci Opština se nalazi na sjeveroistoku Republike Srpske-BiH. Locirana je u središnjem dijelu toka rijeke Drine na koju se prislanja u dužini od 45 km, od čega je oko 23km Perućačko jezero, HE Bajina Bašta. Graniči sa opštinama Bratunac, Milići, Rogatica i Višegrad u BiH, i opštinom Bajina Bašta u Republici Srbiji. Prije rata u okviru regionalno-teritorijalnog uređenja u Republici Bosni i Hercegovini, Srebrenica je pripadala Tuzlanskom okrugu. Tabela 1. Opšti podaci Pokazatelji Opština Srebrenica Površina (km2) 531,96 Gustina naseljenosti (stanovnika/km2) 22 Broj stanovnika (2016.god.) 11698 Broj nezaposlenih (31.03.2017. god.) 1786 Broj zaposlenih (2016. god.) 2000 Prosječna neto plata u 2016.god. (KM) 834 Oranična površina (ha) 11.136 Izvor: Republički zavod za statistiku, Republika Srpska Prostorni plan Republike Srpske (usvojen) 2 1.2. Saobraćajna povezanost Opština se ne nalazi na glavnim regionalnim saobraćajnim koridorima. Pojedini djelovi opštine su bolje povezani sa Republikom Srbijom i sa drugim područjima Bosne i Hercegovine, nego sa urbanim centrom. Do opštine postoje samo putne komunikacije. Prema tome opština Srebrenica spada u saobraćajno slabo povezanu opštinu. Srebrenica je pored regionalnih putnih pravaca (Bratunac-Skelani, Bratunac-Srebrenica-Skelani i Zeleni Jadar-Milići) prije rata imala izrazito razvijenu putno-komunikacionu mrežu makadamskih lokalnih - opštinskih seoskih puteva, koji su se koristili za potrebe stanovništva, turizma, lovnog turizma i privrede.
    [Show full text]
  • Sahranjivanje I Pogrebni Obiĉaji Od Kasne Antike Do 11. Stoljeća
    Univerzitet u Sarajevu Filozofski fakultet Odsjek za historiju Katedra za arheologiju Danira Karović Sahranjivanje i pogrebni obiĉaji od kasne antike do 11. stoljeća (završni diplomski rad) Mentor: prof. dr. Adnan Busuladţić Sarajevo 2020. “Historija smrti je komplikovana najmanje onoliko koliko i historija ţivota“. (Cannadine 1981, 242.) 1 Sadrţaj UVOD 3 1. HISTORIJAT ISTRAŢIVANJA 6 2. SAHRANJIVANJE I TIPOVI GROBOVA I NEKROPOLA 10 3. KASNOANTIĈKO DOBA 12 3.1. Kasnoantiĉke stele 12 3.2. Urne (kasna antika) 17 3.3. Sarkofazi (kasna antika) 19 3.4. Mauzoleji 24 3.5. Kasnoantiĉke grobnice na svod 28 3.6. Grobne konstrukcije na dvije vode 31 4. RANOSREDNJOVJEKOVNO DOBA 32 4.1. Ukop u sarkofag (rani srednji vijek) 32 4.2. Ukopi u tumule 33 4.3. Urne (rani srednji vijek) 35 4.4. Nekropole uz antiĉke objekte ili bazilikalne prostore 39 4.5. Nekropole ravnih grobova 59 5. POGREBNI OBIĈAJI 77 6. KATALOG 85 7. ZAKLJUĈNA RAZMATRANJA 119 8. KRATICE 122 9. BIBLIOGRAFIJA 123 10. SAŢETAK 140 11. SUMMARY 141 12. BIOGRAFIJA 142 2 UVOD Historijska ĉinjenica o propasti Rimskog Carstva dovela je do mnogih promjena i to ne samo u dijelovima na kojem se rasprostiralo, nego i u ostalim zemljama širom Evrope. Poĉetak ―propadanja‖ se obiĉno datira u 3. ili 4. stoljeće, a na njega je uticalo mnogo faktora, od stalnih pritisaka i napada germanskih ali i drugih naroda na rimski limes, ali svakako i uslijed propadanja društvenih, ekonomskih i kulturnih prilika. Period nakon raspada Rimskog carstva nerijetko se pominje u historiji kao Mraĉno doba ―kolapsa rimske civilizacije‖, i ĉesto je tumaĉen kao period od malog znaĉaja.
    [Show full text]
  • Statut Opstine Srebrenica
    OSNA I HERCEGOVINA/БОСНА И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНА BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA REPUBLIKA SRPSKA/РЕПУБЛИКА СРПСКА REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA ОPŠTINA SREBRENICA/ОПШТИНА СРЕБРЕНИЦА MUNICIPALITY OF SREBRENICA NAČELNIK OPŠTINE/НАЧЕЛНИК ОПШТИНЕ MAYOR OF MUNICIPALITY Adresa: Srebreničkog odreda bb, Adress: Srebrenickog odreda bb, Адреса: Сребреничког одреда бб, Tel: 056/445–514, 445–501 Tel/Тел: 056/445–514, 445–501 Fax: 056/445–233 Faks/Факс: 056/445–233 Email: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.srebrenica.gov.ba Web: www.srebrenica.gov.ba Srebrenica:14.05.2018.godine Broj: 01-022- /18 Na osnovu člana 39. i 82. Stav 2. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi („Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske“, broj: 97/16), Skupština opštine Srebrenica na VII tematskoj sjednici održanoj dana 11.05.2018. na prijedlog Načelnika opštine d o n o s i STATUT OPŠTINE SREBRENICA I OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1. (1) Ovim statutom uređuju se područje, sjedište i simboli opštine Srebrenica kao jedinice lokalne samouprave, teritorijalna organizacija, mjesne zajednice, način i uslovi njihovog formiranja, poslovi opštine Srebrenica, osnivanje i uređenje Opštinske uprave, organizacija i rad njenih organa, nadzor nad radom organa Opštine, odbor za žalbe, primopredaja dužnosti, akti i finansiranje, javnost rada, oblici učešća građana u lokalnoj samoupravi, odnos Republičkih organa i Opštine, zaštita prava Opštine, saradnja sa drugim jedinicama lokalne samouprave i drugim institucijama, prekogranična i međunarodna saradnja, postupak za izmjenu i donošenje statuta opštine Srebrenica (u daljem tekstu: statut opštine ), prava i dužnosti zaposlenih u Opštinskoj upravi i druga pitanja od lokalnog interesa u skladu sa zakonom. (2) Gramatički odnosno pojedini izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom statutu za označavanje muškog ili ženskog roda podrazumijevaju oba pola.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadži Husejn Eff. Đozić Ruhi Kadija Iz Srebrenice I Nikšički Naib
    Prof. dr. Adib ĐOZIĆ Izvorni naučni rad/Original scientific article Filozofski fakultet UDK: 94:929:051(497.6 Srebrenica)”1820/1894” Univerziteta u Tuzli HADŽI HUSEJN EFF. ĐOZIĆ RUHI KADIJA IZ SREBRENICE I NIKŠIČKI NAIB Apstrakt: Mnogo je u bosansko-bošnjačkoj historiji zaboravljenih značajnih ličnosti koji su svojim znanjem i radom dali značajan doprinos razvoju bosanskog društva i bošnjačkog nacionalnog identiteta u vremenu i mjestu u kome su živjeli. Najviše zaboravljenih značajnih Bošnjaka je onih koji su živjeli i radili u vrijeme vladavine Osmanske države Bosnom. Jedna od takvih ličnosti je i Hadži Husejn eff. Đozić Ruhi kadija iz Srebrenice i nikšićki naib. Živio je u Srebrenici u 19. stoljeću. Školovao se u Istanbulu, a kadijsku službu obavljao u tri grada i dvije carevine. U radu govorimo, upravo, o Hadži Husejn eff. Đoziću, njegovom životu i radu, te značaju dokumenata koji su sačuvani, za razumijevanje bosanskog društva i položaja Bošnjaka u drugoj polovini 19. stoljeća u Srebrenici i Nikšiću. Ključne riječi: Hadži Husejn Đozić Ruhi, Srebrenica, Nikšić, kadija, naib, sidžili, ustanici. HAJI HUSEIN EFF. ĐOZIĆ RUHI JUDGE FROM SREBRENICA AND NIKŠIĆ VICEROY Abstract: There are many forgotten significant persons in Bosnian-Bosniak history, who through their knowledge and work made a significant contribution to the development of Bosnian society and the Bosniak national identity in the time and place they lived in. The most forgotten significant Bosniaks are those who lived and worked during the reign of the Ottoman state of Bosnia. One of such persons is Hadji Husein eff. Đozić Ruhi, kadi (judge) from Srebrenica and Nikšić naib (viceroy).
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement by Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina on the Results Achieved in the Implementation of the Washington Agreements
    Council of Europe Conseil de l'Europe ★ ★ ^ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Strasbourg, 3 October 1994 Restricted CDL (94) 56 COE253624 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW Joint Statement by Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina on the results achieved in the implementation of the Washington Agreements This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. Translation JOINT STATEMENT The delegations of the Republic of Croatia, the Republic' of Bosnia arid Herzegovina, ánd the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, led by the President qf the Republic of Croatia Dr. Franjo Tudman, the President of the: Presidency 'ófBosnia and Herzegovina Mr. Alija Izetbegovic, arid the President of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Mr. Kre&mir Zubak, respectively, met at the Presidential Palace in Zagreb on September 13 and 14, 1994. The delegation of ike Republic of Croatia included: Mr. Nildcd Valentie, Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia; Dr. Jure Radió, Chief of Staff of the President of the Republic of Croatia; Mr. Hrvoje SariniC, Head of the Office for National Security of the Republic of Croatia;. Dr. Mate Granió, Vice-Premier and Minister of the Republic, of Croatia; Mr. ' Gojko Susak, Minister of Defense of the Republic of Croatia; ■ Mr. BozoPrka, Minister of Finance of the Republic of Croatia; Mr. Nadan Vidosevic, Minister of the Economy of the Republic of Croatia; Dr. Zdravko Sancevic, Ambassador of the Republic of Croatia to the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina; Dr. Miomir Zulul, Ambassador, Adviser to the President of the Republic of Croatia; Dr.
    [Show full text]