AUDIT REPORT ON THE ACCOUNTS OF TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONS DISTRICT VEHARI

AUDIT YEAR 2012-2013

AUDITOR GENERAL OF PAKISTAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...... i

PREFACE ...... ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... iii

SUMMARY TABLES AND CHARTS ...... vi

Table 1: Audit Work Statistics ...... vi

Table 2: Audit Observations ...... vi

Table 3: Outcome Statistics ...... vii

Table 4: Irregularities Pointed Out ...... vii

CHAPTER-1 ...... 1

1. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONS, VEHARI ...... 1

1.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

1.1.1 Comments on Budget and Accounts (Variance Analysis)...... 2

1.1.2 Brief Comments on Status of Compliance with PAC/ZAC Directives ..... 3

1.2 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Vehari ...... 4

1.2.1 Non-Production of Record ...... 5

1.2.2 Performance ...... 6

1.3 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Burewala ...... 10

1.3.1 Irregularities & Non-Compliance ...... 11

1.3.2 Performance ...... 14

Annexures ...... 22

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ADP Annual Development Programme CCB Citizen Community Board DAC Departmental Accounts Committee FD Finance Department IPSAS International Public Sector Accounting Standards LG&CD Local Government & Community Development MFDAC Memorandum for Department Accounts Committee NAM New Accounting Model PAC Public Accounts Committee PDG Punjab District Government PLGO Punjab Local Government Ordinance PDSSP Punjab Devolved Social Sector Programme TAC Town Accounts Committee TMA Town Municipal Administration TMO Town Municipal Officer TO (F) Town Officer (Finance) TO (I&S) Town Officer (Infrastructure & Services) TO (P&C) Town Officer (Planning & Coordination) TO (R) Town Officer (Regulations)

i

Preface Articles 169 and 170 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and Section 115 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001 require the Auditor General of Pakistan to conduct the audit of the receipts and expenditure of the Local Fund and Public Accounts of Tehsil / Town Municipal Administrations of the Districts. The Report is based on audit of Tehsil Municipal Administration of District Vehari for the years 2010-12. The Directorate General of Audit District Governments Punjab (South), Multan, conducted audit during 2012-13 on test check basis with a view to reporting significant findings to relevant stakeholders. The main body of Audit Report includes only the systemic issues and audit findings carrying value of Rs.1 million or more. Relatively less significant issues are listed in the Annexure-I of the Audit Report. The Audit observations listed in the Annexure-I shall be pursued with the Principal Accounting Officer at the DAC level and in all cases where the PAO does not initiate appropriate action, the Audit observations will be brought to the notice of the Public Accounts Committee through the next year’s Audit Report. Audit findings indicate need for adherence to the regularity framework besides instituting and strengthening internal controls to avoid recurrence of similar violations and irregularities. Most of the observations included in this Report have been finalized in the light of written responses and discussion with the management. The Audit Report is submitted to the Governor of the Punjab in pursuance of Article 171 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, read with Section 115 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, for causing it to be laid before the Provincial PAC.

Islamabad (Muhammad Akhtar Buland Rana) Dated: Auditor General of Pakistan

ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Directorate General Audit, District Governments, Punjab (South), Multan, a Field Audit Office of the Auditor General of Pakistan is responsible to carry out the audit of all District Governments in Punjab (South) including Tehsil and Town Municipal Administrations. Its Regional Directorate of Audit Multan has audit jurisdiction of District Governments, TMAs and UAs of six Districts i.e. Multan, Lodhran, Vehari, Sahiwal, Pakpattan and Khanewal.

The Regional Directorate has a human resource of 32 including 25 officers, constituting 7,575 man days and a budget allocation of about Rs 11.029 million for financial year 2011-12. It has the mandate to conduct financial attest audit, audit of sanctions, audit of compliance with authority and audit of receipts as well as the Performance Audit of entities, projects and programs. Accordingly, R.D.A Multan carried out audit of the accounts of two TMAs of District Vehari for the financial years 2010-2012 and the findings are included in this Audit Report.

Each Tehsil Municipal Administration in District Vehari is headed by a Tehsil Nazim / Administrator. He/she carries out operations as per Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001. Tehsil Municipal Officer is the Principal Accounting Officer (PAO) and acts as coordinating and administrative officer, responsible to control land use, its division and development and to enforce all laws including Municipal Laws, Rules and by-laws. The PLGO, 2001, requires the establishment of Tehsil / Town Local Fund and Public Account for which Annual Budget Statement is authorized by the Tehsil Nazim / Tehsil Council / Administrator in the form of Budgetary Grants.

The total Development Budget of two above mentioned TMAs in District Vehari for the financial years 2010-2012, was Rs 500.301 million and expenditure incurred was of Rs 209.470 million, showing savings of Rs 290.831million in these years. The total Non Development Budget for financial year 2011-2012 was Rs 598.489 million and expenditure was of Rs 465.740 million, showing savings of Rs 132.749 million. The reasons for savings in Development and Non development Budgets are required to be provided by TMO and PAO concerned.

Audit of TMAs of District Vehari was carried out with the view to ascertain that the expenditure was incurred with proper authorization, in

iii conformity with laws/rules/regulations, economical procurement of assets and hiring of services etc.

Audit of receipts/ revenues was also conducted to verify whether the assessment, collection, reconciliation and allocation of revenues were made in accordance with laws and rules and that there was no leakage of revenue. a. Audit Methodology

Audit was conducted after understanding the business processes of TMAs with respect to functions, control structure, prioritization of risk areas by determining their significance and identification of key controls. This helped auditors in understanding the systems, procedures, environment, and the audited entity before starting field audit activity. Audit used desk audit techniques for analysis of compiled data and review of permanent files/record. Desk Audit greatly facilitated identification of high-risk areas for substantive testing in the field. b. Audit of Expenditure and Receipts Audit of development expenditure of Rs 62.841 million was carried out, out of the total expenditure of Rs 209.470 million and Audit of non development expenditure Rs 105.961million out of the total expenditure of Rs 465.740 million for the financial year 2010-2012 was conducted, which are 30% & 23% of development and non development expenditures, respectively. Total overall expenditure of TMAs of District Vehari for the financial year 2010-2012 was Rs 168.802 million, out of which overall expenditure of Rs 675.210 million was audited, which is 25% of total expenditure. Therefore, there was 100% achievement against the planned audit activities. c. Recoveries at the Instance of Audit Recoveries of Rs 115.181 million were pointed out through various audit paras but no recovery was effected till the compilation of this Report. Out of the total recoveries Rs17.854 was not in the notice of the Executive before audit. d. The Key Audit Findings of the Report i. Non production of record of Rs 62.516 million noted in one case.1 ii. Non compliance of Rules and Regulations amounting to Rs 3.919 million noted in two cases.2

1 Para: 1.2.1.1 2 Para: 1.3.1.1,1.3.1.2 iv

iii. Performance issues involving an amount of Rs 119.607 million were noted in twelve cases 3.

iv. Audit Paras on the accounts for 2010-12 involving procedural violations including internal control weaknesses and irregularities which were not considered worth reporting to Provincial PAC, therefore have been included in Memorandum for Departmental Accounts Committee (MFDAC), (Annexure-A). e. Recommendations

Audit recommends that the PAO/management of TMAs should ensure to resolve the following issues seriously:

i. Take disciplinary action against the concered for non production of record ii. Take disciplinary action against the concerned for poor recovery iii. Holding of DAC meetings in time iv. Take measures to stop illegal construction of buildings. v. Take measures to stop illegal development of residential colonies. vi. Take disciplinary action against the concered DDO for poor budgting. vii. Un-authorized expenditure shuod be get regularized viii. Expediting recoveries pointed out by Audit as well as other recoveries in the notice of management ix. Compliance of relevant laws, rules, instructions and procedures, etc. x. Proper maintenance of accounts and production of record xi. Appropriate actions against officers/officials responsible for violation of rules xii. Realization and reconciliation of various receipts xiii. Holding of investigations for wastage, fraud, misappropriation and losses, and taking disciplinary actions after fixing responsibilities.

3 Para: 1.2.2.1 to 1.2.2.5, 1.3.2.1 to 1.3.2.7 v

SUMMARY TABLES AND CHARTS

Table 1: Audit Work Statistics (Rupees in million) Budget / Sr. No. Description No. Expenditure 1 Total Entities (PAOs) in Audit Jurisdiction 03 1,051.634 2 Total formations in Audit Jurisdiction 03 1,051.634 3 Total Entities (PAOs)/ DDOs Audited 02 675.210* 4 Audit & Inspection Reports 02 - 5 Special Audit Reports Nil Nil 6 Performance Audit Reports Nil Nil 7 Other Reports (Relating to TMA) Nil Nil *Accounts of TMAs Burewala were audited for two years.

Table 2: Audit Observations (Rupees in million) Amount under audit Sr. No. Description observation 1 Asset management - 2 Financial management 88.457 3 Internal controls - 4 Violation of rules 3.919 5 Others 93.666 Total 186.042

vi

Table 3: Outcome Statistics

Expenditure Outlay Audited (Rupees in million) Sr. Physical Civil Description Receipt Others Total No. Assets Works 1 Outlays audited 5.302 209.470 869.199 460.438 1,544.409* 2 Amount placed under audit - 1.688 79.067 105.287 186.042 observation / irregularities 3 Recoveries pointed out at the - 0.599 97.327 17.255 115.181 instance of Audit 4 Recoverable accepted / - 0.599 97.327 17.255 115.181 established at Audit instance 5 Recoveries realized at the - - - - - instance of Audit *The amount in serial No.1 column of “Total Current Year” is the sum of Expenditure and Receipts whereas the total expenditure for the current year was Rs 675.210 million.

Table 4: Irregularities Pointed Out (Rupees in million) Sr. Amount under Audit Description No. observation 1 Violation of rules and regulations and principle of propriety and 3.919 probity. 2 Reported cases of fraud, embezzlement, theft, misappropriations - and misuse of public funds. 3 Quantification of weaknesses of internal controls system. - 4 Recoverables, overpayments, or unauthorized payments of 114.581 public money. 5 Non production of record to Audit 62.516 6 Others, including cases of accidents, negligence etc. 5.026 Total 186.042

vii

CHAPTER-1

1. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONS, VEHARI

1.1 INTRODUCTION

Tehsil Municipal Administration (TMA) consists of Tehsil Nazim, Tehsil Naib Nazim and Tehsil Municipal Officer (TMO). Each TMA comprises five Drawing and Disbursing Officers i.e. TMO, TO (Finance), TO (Infrastructure and Services), TO (Regulation), TO (Planning and Coordination) and Tehsil Nazim and Tehsil Naib Nazim. The main functions of TMAs are as follows:- i. Enforce all municipal laws, rules and bye-laws governing TMA’s functioning; ii. Prepare budget, long term and annual municipal development programmes in collaboration with the Union Councils; iii. Propose taxes, cesses, user fees, rates, rents, tolls, charges, surcharges, levies, fines and penalties under Part-III of the Second Schedule and notify the same; iv. Collect approved taxes, cesses, user fees, rates, rents, tolls, charges, fines and penalties; v. Manage properties, assets and funds vested in the Town Municipal Administration; vi. Develop and manage schemes, including site development in collaboration with District Government and Union Administration; vii. Issue notice for committing any municipal offence by any person and initiate legal proceedings for commission of such offence or failure to comply with the directions contained in such notice; viii. Prosecute, sue and follow up criminal, civil and recovery proceedings against violators of Municipal Laws in the courts of competent jurisdiction;

ix. Maintain municipal records and archives.

1

1.1.1 Comments on Budget and Accounts (Variance Analysis) (Amount in Rupees) Excess (+) / % 2011-12 Budget Expenditure Saving (-) (Saving) Salary 332,715,500 288,997,845 -43,717,655 -13% Non-salary 265,773,200 176,742,044 -89,031,156 -33% Development 500,301,000 209,470,211 -290,830,789 -58% Revenue 682,950,715 - - -

Total 1,781,740,415 675,210,100 -423,579,600 39%

Details of budget allocations, expenditures and savings of each TMA in District Vehari for three financial years are at Annexure-B.

2

As per Budget Books for the financial years 2010-12 of TMAs in District Vehari, the original and final budgets were of Rs1,098.790 million. Total expenditures incurred by these TMAs during financial years 2010-2012 were Rs675.210 million. There was a saving of Rs 423.580 million the reasons for which should be provided by the PAO, Tehsil Nazims and management of TMAs.

(Amount in rupees)

1.1.2 Brief Comments on Status of Compliance with PAC/ZAC Directives No. of Sr. No. Audit Year Status of PAC/ZAC Meeting Paras 1 2009-12 29 Nil Total 29

As indicated in the above table, no PAC/ZAC meeting was convened to discuss the audit reports of TMAs.

3

1.2 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Vehari

4

Audit Report

1.2.1 Non-Production of Record

1.2.1.1 Non Production of CCB’s Vouched Account – Rs 62. 516 Million

According to Section 14 (2) of Auditor General’s (Functions, Powers and Terms & Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2001, the officer in charge of any office or department shall afford all facilities and provide record for audit inspection and comply with requests for information in as complete a form as possible and with all reasonable expedition. Also, Section 14(3) of AGP Ordinance requires that any person or authority hindering the auditorial functions of the Auditor General regarding inspection of accounts shall be subject to disciplinary action under relevant Efficiency and Discipline Rules, applicable to such person.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari transferred funds of Rs 62.516 million to twenty seven CCBs during 2011-12. The record pertaining to approvals of releases, vouched accounts, bank statements of CCB projects and monitoring reports etc. was not produced to audit in violation of above rule. The detail is given in Annexure-C.

Audit is of the view that due to poor maintenance of record or intentioanl consealement, the recor was not produced.

The non-production of record constitutes violation of government rules and legal provisions and attempt to cause hindrance in the auditorial functions of the Auditor General of Pakistan.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that the CCB persons would be asked to provide copies of accounts of their projects. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends that responsibility be fixed and appropriate disciplinary action taken against the concerned for non-production of record, besides production of the same for Audit scrutiny.

[AIR Para No. 05] 5

1.2.2 Performance

1.2.2.1 Non- Recovery of Rent of Shops –Rs 28. 564 million

According to Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari did not recover rent of shops properly which resulted in non-recovery of Rs28.564 million during 2011-12. Neither the TMO made efforts to recover the arrears nor cases of defaulter tenants were sent to district collector as arrears of land revenue. The detail is given in Annexure-D.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficieny, government revenue was not realized.

Non recovery of receipts resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that efforts would be made for recovery. No further progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery and fixing of responsibility against the TMO concerned under intimation to Audit. [AIR Para No.07]

1.2.2.2 Non-Recovery of Water Rate Charges & Sewerage Tax – Rs21.840 Million

According to Rule 76 of PDG & TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund. Further, according to Rule 12(2) PLG (Taxation) Rules, 2001, for recovery of arrears of land revenue, a statement of account certified by the TO (F) shall be forwarded to the Collector of the District to recover the sum demanded as arrears of land revenue from the defaulters.

6

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari did not recover water rate charges and sewerge tax properly which resulted in non-recovery of Rs.21.840 million during 2011-12. Neither the TMO made efforts to recover the arrears nor cases of defaulter were sent to district collector as arrears of land revenue. The detail is enclosed in Annexure-E.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, government revenue was not realized.

Non recovery of receipts resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that efforts would be made for recovery. No further progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery and fixing of responsibility against the TMO concerned under intimation to Audit. [AIR Para No.09]

1.2.2.3 Non-Recovery of Outstanding Dues against Various Contractors and Other Individuals –Rs 13. 014 Million

According to Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari sanctioned Rs13.014 million temporay advances in favour of various employees for official business. Neither the advances were recouped nor action was taken against the officials for recovery. The detail is in annexure-F.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, advances were not recouped/ recovered.

Non recoupementof temporary advances resulted in loss to government.

7

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that efforts would be made for recovery. No further progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery and fixing of responsibility against the TMO concerned under intimation to Audit. [AIR Para No.10]

1.2.2.4 Non-Recovery of Commercialization / Conversion, Map, and Form Fee –Rs 3.917 million

According to Rule 76 of PDG & TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari did not recover various fees chargeable on various unauthorized constructions despite issuance of notices. The detail is enclosed in Annexure-G.

Audit is of the view that due to weak internal controls and inefficiency, outstanding dues were not recovered.

Non recovery of outstanding dues resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that efforts would be made for recovery. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends recovery of loss, besides action against the responsible, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.16]

8

1.2.2.5 Non-recovery of Outstanding Dues of Development Charges of Kachi Abadies - Rs 3.869 million

According to Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal OfficerVehari did not recover cost of land and development charges of Kachi Abadies Rs3.869 million. Detail is given in Annexure-H.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management, huge amount was not recovered.

Non-recovery of outstanding dues resulted in loss to TMA to the tune of Rs. 3.869 million.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO replied that efforts would be made for recovery. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends recovery of outstanding dues, besides appropriate action against concenred TMO under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.17]

9

1.3 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Burewala

10

1.3.1 Irregularities & Non-Compliance

1.3.1.1 Unauthorized Purchase of Machinery & Other Items – Rs 2.231 Million

According Rules 12 (1) & 13 (1) of Punjab Procurement Rules 2009, procurements over one hundred thousand rupees and up to the limit of two million rupees shall be advertised on the PPRA’s website in the manner and format specified by regulation by the PPRA from time to time. These procurement opportunities may also be advertised in print media, if deemed necessary by the procuring agency. Under no circumstances the response time shall be less than fifteen days for national competitive bidding. Further according to rule 7 (2) of Punjab Local Governments (Contract) Rules, 2003 the Nazim shall, at least seven days before entering into a contract involving an expenditure exceeding rupees twenty five thousand in case of Tehsil Administration give public notice in a newspaper inviting tenders for such contract and may accept any of the tenders so made, which appears to him the most advantageous.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala purchased machinery for Rs2.231 million without advertisement on the PPRA’s website. Further response time was also given less than 15 days. The tenders were not invited as sale of tender register was not maintained. No tender fee was deposited.

(Amount in Rupees) Cont. Bill Supplier Name Item Purchased Date Voucher Date Amount No. # Qadoos Chemical Electric goods, 817 Nil 176 01.2011 792,090 Corporation Lhr. Street Light Anjum Iqbal Siemens motors Nil 04.04.12 68 04.2012 750,000 Contractor Lhr. 60HP 1460rpm Salman Brothers De-watering set 22 07.11.11 229 12.2011 561,440 Vehari complete Muhammad Repair of sofa set & Afzal Govt Nil 04.04.11 91 06.2011 127,741 curtain purchased contractor Vehari Total 2,231,271

11

Audit is of the view that due to weak internal control and mismanagement, PPRA instructions were violated.

This non-observance of PPRA instructions resulted into non-transparent and uneconomical purchase of machinery.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends regularization and taking of appropriate action against the concerned under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.06]

1.3.1.2 Unauthorized Approval of ADP Schemes without Location and Particulars – Rs 1. 688 million

According to Rule 7 (a) & (b) of Punjab Tehsil/Town Municipal Administration (Works) Rules, 2003, a draft scheme prepared under these rules shall, among other matters, specify detailed history of the scheme including nature and location of the schemes and full particulars of the works to be executed.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala got approval of development schemes of Rs1.688 million in the ADP for the financial year 2010-11. The schemes were approved without locations and full particulars i.e., name of the area where work was required to be executed and quantity of work in each area. In absence of site locations and quantity of work, the approval of estimate was unjustified. The detail is as under: -

(Amount in rupees) Sr. # Name of Work Amount 36 Missing links sewerage City Burewala 371,000 38 Making of connection new water supply pipe lines 990,000 76 Construction of soling & Drain Gaggoo 327,000 Total Amount of Schemes 1,688,000

12

Audit is of the view that due to weak internal controls, development schemes were approved without any specifications.

Approval of schemes without any specifications resulted in violation of government rules.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends regularization besides taking disciplinary action against the TMO concerne, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.07]

13

1.3.2 Performance

1.3.2.1 Loss to Government due to Non-Recovery of Map Fee and Conversion Fee - Rs 22.128 Million

According to Rule 60(1), (a)(b)(c)(d)(e) of Punjab Land Use (Classification, Reclassification and Redevelopment) Rules, 2009, a City District Government or a Tehsil Municipal Administration shall levy conversion-of-land- use fee for conversion of residential, industrial, pre-urban area or intercity service area to commercial use which shall be twenty percent of the value of the commercial land as per valuation table or twenty percent of the average sales price of the preceding twelve months of commercial land in the vicinity.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala did not recover commercialization fee of Rs 22.128 million from the owners of buildings who constructed the illegal buildings without payment of commercialization fees in violation of above rule. The detail is given below:

(Amount in Rupees) Conversion Area in Av. Price Map fee Total Name Location Purpose fee due Marla Per Marla @ 3/Sft Recoverable 20% 10 College Aarooma cafe Restaurant (double 280,000 16,320 560,000 576,320 Road story) Aarooma Marriage C block 40 280,000 32,640 2,240,000 2,272,640 B.B.Que Hall 517 Mirch Masala Multan Restaurant 160 30,000 65,280 960,000 1,025,280 Road Ittefaq Flying Multan Vegan 40 550,000 32,640 4,400,000 4,432,640 Coach Road Stand Madina Flying Arifwala Vegan 40 675,000 32,640 5,400,000 5,432,640 Coach Road Stand Al-barket Arifwala Vegan 40 675,000 32,640 5,400,000 5,432,640 Flying Coach Road Stand 10 New Z Knife & Folk Restaurant (double 390,000 16,320 780,000 796,320 Block story) Total Less Recovery 228,480 21,900,000 22,128,480

14

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, map fee & conversion fee were not recovered.

Non-recovery of map fee & conversion fee resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends appropriate measures to obtain map fee & conversion fee within the jurisdiction of TMA, besides fixation of responsibility, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.16]

1.3.2.2 Non-recovery of Rent of Shops - Rs 8.965 million

According to Rule (1) (b) of Punjab Local Government (Property) Rules, 2003, the period of lease of property shall be up to five years at a time. Further, according to Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala did not recover an amount of Rs8.965 million for the period 2010-12 including arrears of 2009-10 on account of rent of shops from the lessees of the shops. TMO neither made efforts to recover the rent nor took action against the defaulters. Further, shops were required to be re- auctioned after every five years but no such auction was made in violation of above rules. The detail is given in Annexure-I.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, rent of shops was not recovered.

Non-recovery of rent of shops resulted in loss to government.

15

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO signed the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery besides fixing of responsibility against the concered TMO under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.01]

1.3.2.3 Loss to Government due to Less Recovery of Conversion Fee for Commercial Use of Land - Rs 5.775 million

According to Rule 60 (a) of Punjab Land Use (Classification, Reclassification and Redevelopment) Rules, 2009, the conversion fee for the conversion of residential, industrial, pre-urban area or intercity service area to commercial use shall be twenty percent of the value of the commercial land as per valuation table, or twenty percent of the average sale price of preceding twelve months of commercial land in the vicinity, if valuation table is not available.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala approved the maps by charging less conversion fee amounting to Rs5.775 million duirng 2010-12 for commercial use of land in violation of above mentioned rule. The detail is as under:

(Amount in rupees) C Area Av. Price Conversion ase Date Name Location Purpose in Per fee due Recovered Balance No Marla Marla 20% Qurban Ali Chichawatni s/o Bus stand 22 29.08.11 Road 40.5 650,000 5,265,000 2,514,000 2,751,000 Muhammad D-class Burewala Baksh Muazzam Ali Petrole 62 02.02.12 s/o Ghulam 47 KB 53 7,500 79,500 66,250 13,250 pump Farid Muhammad Irfan Shafi, Vehari Commerci 66 11.02.12 9.875 2,225,000 4,394,375 1,383,413 3,010,962 Muhammad Bazar al buildings Adnan Safi Total Less Recovery 5,775,212

16

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, conversion fee was less charged.

Less charging of commercialization fee resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery besides fixing of responsibility against the concered TMO under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.02]

1.3.2.4 Non-auctioning of Shops and Non Recovery of Rent – Rs 5.648 Million

According to Rule (1) (b) of Punjab Local Government (Property) Rules, 2003, the period of lease of property shall be up to five years at a time. Further, according to Rule 4 (d) of the Punjab Local Government (Property) Rules, 2003, it is the responsibility of the manager of the property of TMA that rented property fetches maximum rent.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Vehari did not recover rent of shops amounting to Rs 5.648 million. As per record, agreement of most of the shops had already expired after 5 years of their auction. After this date, shops were to be openly re- auctioned but the same were not re-auctioned. Rent was also not increased as per government instruction of 10% annual increase. The detail is given below:

(Amount in Rupees) Average Average Total Monthly Rent to No. of Monthly Expected Name of market be Recovered Difference Shops Rent per Loss for 2 after fresh shop Years auction Goal Chowk 42 1,620 2,200 580 584,640 Arif Bazar 142 1,235 1,700 465 1,584,720 17

Food Green Road & Joyia Road 89 411 1,000 589 1,258,104 Burewala General Bas Stand 11 1,594 2,200 606 159,984 Tharajat Lakkar 18 731 1,500 769 332,208 Mandi Vehari Bazar 142 693 1,200 507 1,727,856 Total 444 5,647,512

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, shops were not auctioned after expiry of 5 years.

Non auction of shops after 5 years at competitative rates resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends immediate recovery and auction of shops at conmpetitatives rates besides fixing of responsibility against the concerned, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.03]

1.3.2.5 Construction of Illegal Housing Schemes and Non-recovery of Government Fee – Rs 2.821 million

According to Notification No. 1697/TN/TNA dated 21/02/07, schedule of rates issued by the TMA, map fee @ 25,000/- per acres is to be recovered from the owner of the housing scheme. N.O.C fee is also to be recovered from such housing scheme. If such housing schemes did not submit their maps to TMA, necessary action has to be taken against such defaulters.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala did not take action against developer of illegal housing schemes in jurisdiction of TMA. Furthermore, TMO did not recover prescribed fee of Rs 2.821 million from the developers of the housing

18 schemes who applied for approval. These cases were under process in P&C Section even after lapse of 14 months which needs justification. (Amount in Rupees) Map/Plan Total Avg. Price Conversion Approval Case. Name of Owner and Area Per Marla fee of Total Location fee @ Rs No Housing Scheme in (as per yard commercial Recovery 25000 per Kanal stick) area Acre 1 / 13- Javed Akhtar s/o 07-11 Muhammad Yousaf 439 EB 34K 195,000 1,326,000 100,000 1,426,000 City Gardens Wasif Sajad, Sardar Asif s/o 47K - 2 / 13- M. Sajad 441/EB 19M - 100,000 959,200 150,000 1,109,200 07-11 Illyas Garden 1.5S Muhammad Iqbal Shahid s/o 38 / 02- 185/EB 40K - M.Sharif 20,000 161,000 125,000 286,000 12-11 Gaggoo 5M Raheem City Phase II

Total 2,446,200 375,000 2,821,200

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, illegal housing schemes were constructed without approval of map fee & conversion fee.

Non-recovery of map fee & conversion fee resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends recovery of prescribed government fee and fixing of responsibility against the concerned, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.04] 1.3.2.6 Non-recovery of Sewer Connection Fee - Rs 1. 676 Million

According Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

19

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala did not recoverRs 1.676 million for the period 2010-12, on account of sewer connection fee and gutter tank fee for 6447 connections of sewer @ Rs 100 per connection once and gutter tank fee @ 80 per year for 02 years. No action has been taken against the defaulters.

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, sewer connection fee and gutter fee were not recovered.

Non-recovery resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends action against the concerned, besides recovery, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.08]

1.3.2.7 Blockage of Funds due to Non-recovery of Water Rate Charges - Rs 1.390 million

According to Rule 76 of PDG and TMA (Budget) Rules, 2003, the Collecting Officers shall ensure that all revenue due is claimed, realized and credited immediately into the Local Government Fund.

Tehsil Municipal Officer Burewala did not recover an amount of Rs1.390 million on account of water rate charges during 2010-12 from defaulters. The detail is given below:

(Amount in Rupees) Water Total Amount Rate Amount Arrears connection connection recovered Year 2010-11 Domestic 6,407 240 1,537,680 1,457,205 80,475 Commercial 40 480 19,200 12,000 7,200 Year 2011-12 20

Domestic 6,470 720 4,658,400 3,368,015 1,290,385 Commercial 43 1,200 51,600 39,600 12,000 Total 2,640 6,266,880 4,876,820 1,390,060

Audit is of the view that due to weak financial management and inefficiency, water rate charges were not recovered.

Non-recovery of water rate charges resulted in loss to government.

The matter was reported to the TMO in October, 2012. The TMO noted the observation but did not submit any reply. Despite repeated reminders, DAC meeting was not convened. No progress was intimated till the finalization of this Report.

Audit recommends that responsibility be fixed and appropriate action taken against the concerned besides recovery of arrears, under intimation to Audit.

[AIR Para No.09]

21

Annexures

22

Annexure-I (Rupees in Million) AIR Sr. Para Description Amount No. No.

1 TMA Vehari Less Deduction of Withholding Tax on the Amounts issued for CCB 1 19 Works 0.622 2 21 Non-recovery of License / Trade Fee 0.243 3 22 Non-recovery of Arrears of Revenue 0.195 2 TMA Burewala Defective Rate Analysis of Tuff Tile and Excess Payment to 4 10 Contractor 0.599 5 14 Non-obtaining of Conversion Fee for Residential Use of Land 0.251 Loss to Government due to Negligence and Non-recovery of License 6 23 Fee of Medical Store 0.232 Total 2.142

23

Annexure-A MFDAC PARAS (Rupees in Million) 1 TMA Vehari

AIR Sr. No. Para Description Amount No. Non Submission of Monthly Progress Report by TO (I&S) 1 1 192.742 regarding Development & CCB Schemes –Rs.192, 742,000 Non-Advertising the Tenders of Various Works on PPRA 2 2 130.226 Website –Rs.130, 226,000 Execution of CCB Projects Directly and Non-inclusion in 3 3 62.516 Annual Development Programme Rs.62, 516,000 Loss to Government due to Charging Excess Rates than 4 4 0.349 Prescribed Input Rates for Material - Rs. 349,400 Irregular Block Allocation of Funds in the Annual Budget for 5 6 39.423 2011-12 -Rs.39, 423,000 Auctioning of Collection Rights without Media Coverage - 6 8 25.657 Rs.25657000 Processing of CCB Projects without obtaining the Bank Draft 7 11 12.503 of Rs.12, 503,200 Illegal Auction of Tax on Immoveable Properties –Rs.11, 8 12 11.5 500,000 9 13 Excessive Expenditure on Electricity Rs. 8,999,596 9.999 Loss to Public Exchequer due to Award of Same Nature of 10 14 6.004 Works on Different Rates –Rs. 6,004,112 11 15 Overpayment to MEPCO due to excess Billing Rs. 5,280,145 5.28 Gross Violations of Contract Conditions by Contractors and 12 18 Release of Amounts without Deduction of Compensation – 1.3 Rs.1.3 Million 13 20 Theft of Electric Motor and Transformers –Rs. 490,000 0.49 14 23 Wrong / excess payments to MEPCO –Rs. 153,849 0.154 Total 498.143 1 TMA Burewala

Doubtful Withdrawal of Funds from CCB Bank Account – Rs 15 5 3 3,000,000 Misappropriation / Doubtful Expenditure on Repair of Vehicles 16 11 0.581 - Rs. 581,415

24

Defective Rate Analysis of Tuff Tile and Excess Payment to 17 12 0.481 Contractor Rs481,059 Loss to Government due to Non-auctioning of Sullage Water - 18 13 0.439 Rs 439,595 Irregular Auction of Collection Rights without the Involvement 19 15 24.697 of Media - Rs 24.697 million Irregular Award of 1st Installment to City Welfare CCB – Rs 20 17 2.5 2,500,000 Non-maintenance of Record of Security Deposit of TMA Shops 21 18 0.888 – Rs 888,000 Un-authorized Repair of Machinery and Equipment - Rs 22 19 0.82 820,289 Non-conducting of Realistic Survey of License/ Permit Fee and 23 20 0.6 Misappropriation of Possible Revenue - Rs 600,000 (Approx.) Doubtful / Irregular Expenditure on Account of Purchase of 24 21 0.528 Ornamental Plants - Rs.528,059 Irregular and Doubtful Expenditure on Sports Activities - Rs 25 22 0.455 455,609 Loss to Government due to Purchase on Excessive Rate – 26 24 0.144 RS.144,270 Loss to Government due to Non-deposit of Tender Fee by CCB 27 25 0.019 - Rs.18,750 Defective Rate Analysis and Excess Payment to Contractor Rs 28 26 0.056 55,881 Loss to Government due to Excess Payment to Contractor Rs 29 27 0.044 43,890 30 28 Non-collection of Liquidity Damages – Rs. 53,640 0.054 Defective Rate Analysis of Kerb Stone and Excess Payment to 31 29 0.097 Contractor Rs 96,854 Excess Payment to Contractor through change of specifications 32 30 0.061 Rs 61,538 Defective Rate Analysis of Electric Panel Board and Excess 33 31 0.056 Payment to Contractor - Rs 55,800 Irregular Purchase in Violation of Austerity Measures - 34 32 0.179 Rs.178,780 35 33 Non-Recovery of Income Tax at Source Rs 150,000 0.15 Total 35.849

25

Annexure-B TMAs of VEHARI District Budget and Expenditure Statement for Financial Year 2010-2012 (Amount in Rupees) Excess (+) / % 2011-12 Budget Expenditure Saving (-) (Saving) Salary 332,715,500 288,997,845 -43,717,655 -13% Non-salary 265,773,200 176,742,044 -89,031,156 -33%

Development 500,301,000 209,470,211 -290,830,789 -58%

Revenue 682,950,715 - - -

Total 1,781,740,415 675,210,100 -423,579,600 39%

26

Annexure-C [Para No.1.2.1.1] Non-submission of Annual Accounts by the CCBs – Rs 62.516 million

(Amount in Rupees)

Sr. No.

Scheme

Name &

Location of ShareCCB

TMA TMA Share

Name CCB of Costof Project Construction of Soling Chak No. 1 Arbab C.C.B 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 75/W.B Construction of Sewerage Chak No. 2 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 1,993,000 398,600 1,594,400 62/KB Construction of Filtration Plant 3 Prime C.C.B 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 Anwar Abad Construction of Eid Gah, Janaz Gah 4 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 2,410,000 482,000 1,928,000 182/E.B Construction of Boundary Wall 5 Arbab C.C.B 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 Janaz Gah 77/W.B Construction of Soling, Street 6 Shahanshah C.C.B Zahoor Shah, Street Masjid Wali 525,000 105,000 420,000 Near Islamia High School Vehari. Construction of Filtration Plant 7 Asra C.C.B 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 Maka Town 11/W.B Vehari Construction & improvement of 8 Asra C.C.B 3,000,000 600,000 2,400,000 Faisal Park Vehari Construction of Park V-Block 9 Asra C.C.B 3,000,000 600,000 2,400,000 Peoples Colony Vehari. Construction & Improvement of 10 Asra C.C.B 2,000,000 400,000 1,600,000 Allama Iqbal Park Vehari Construction of Tehmina Daultana 11 Sher C.C.B 1,500,000 300,000 1,200,000 Park Luddan Construction & Extension Sewerage 12 Sher C.C.B 4,985,000 997,000 3,988,000 Line Luddan Construction of New Disposal 13 Sher C.C.B 4,944,000 988,800 3,955,200 Works Luddan Construction of Sewerage Line 14 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 3,176,000 635,200 2,540,800 Phase-II, 62/K.B Construction of Sewerage Chak No. 15 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 2,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 64/KB Construction of Water Supply Chak 16 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 1,107,000 221,400 885,600 No. 64/KB Construction of Sewerage Scheme 17 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 1,998,000 399,600 1,598,400 Chak No. 54/KB Construction of Sewerage Line 18 Prime C.C.B 1,500,000 300,000 1,200,000 Muslim Town Vehari 27

Sr. No.

Scheme

Name &

Location of ShareCCB

TMA TMA Share

Name CCB of Costof Project Construction of Soling Muslim 19 Prime C.C.B Town, Lala Zar, Anwar Abad 2,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 Vehari. Construction of Soling & Drains 20 Arbab C.C.B 1,500,000 300,000 1,200,000 Chak No. 83/W.B Construction of Soling & Sewerage 21 Arbab C.C.B 1,000,000 200,000 800,000 75/W.B Vehari. Construction of Sewerage Scheme 22 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 3,444,000 688,800 2,755,200 Chak No. 575/E.B Construction of Sewerage Scheme 23 Eshan ul Haq C.C.B 4,985,000 997,000 3,988,000 Chak No. 63/W.B Construction of Soling Darbar, 24 Face C.C.B Graveyard Dana Ibrahim to Chak 2,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 No. 477/E.B Construction & Rehabilitation 25 Arbab C.C.B Sewerage line, Drain & Soling 2,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 93/W.B Construction of Soling & Sludge 26 Arqam C.C.B 2,949,000 589,800 2,359,200 Career 182/E.B Construction of Metal Road Chak 27 Arqam C.C.B 2,500,000 500,000 2,000,000 No. 159/W.B Total 62,516,000 12,503,200 50,012,800

28

Annexure-D

[Para No.1.2.2.1]

Non- Recovery of Rent of Shops –Rs.28. 564 million

(Amount in Rupees) Sr. No. Names of Market Amount 1. Goal Chowk Rs. 348,975 2. Corner Goal Chowk Rs.34,842 3. Municipal Market Rs.3,525,467 4. Janah Plaza Rs.1,896,740 5. Mini Market Rs.3,761,479 6. Shopping Centre Rs.8,599,144 7. Sabzi Mandi Rs.3,563,376 8. Club Road Sharqi Rs. 280,822 9. Club Road Gharbi Rs. 110,418 10. Stadium Road Rs. 6,612 11. Shaheen Market Rs. 270,336 12. Diesel Oil Godown Rs. 139,212 13. Sabzi Mandi Godown Rs. 308,474 14. Plot Workshop (Larry Adda) Rs. 127,124 15. Canteen & Wood Cabin (Lari Adda) Rs. 404,694 16. Const. of Plot (Lari Adda) Rs.2,139,874 17. Empty Plot Auction (Larry Adda) Rs. 402,675 18. Godown Old Meet Market Rs.1,407,725 19. Shops Meet Market Rs.35,685 20. Shops P.S.O. Depot Rs. 264,214 21. Shop Taimur Shaheed Colony Rs.67,780 22. Inside Grain Market Rs.51,337 23. Building of Crises Centre Rs. 130,251 24. Building of Octori Posts Rs. 683,806 25. Plot Charm Mandi Rs. 3,853 TOTAL Rs. 28,564,915

29

Annexure-E

[Para No.1.2.2.2]

Non-Recovery of Water Rate & Sewerage Tax– Rs 21. 840 million

(Amount in Rupees)

1 2 3 4 5 6

Block

Rate

Sr. No.

Domestic

Arrear of

Connection

Commercial

Arrear Water Sewerage Tax

Name of

1 U-Block Rs. 556,984 Rs.13,680 Rs. 228 2 V-Block Rs. 869,208 Rs.18,420 Rs. 307 3 W-Block Rs. 758,935 Rs.14,528 Rs. 242 4 X-Block Rs.1,079,196 Rs.15,240 Rs. 254 5 Y-Block Rs. 755,587 Rs.9,960 Rs. 166 6 Z-Block Rs. 486,297 Rs.12,300 Rs. 205 7 A-Block Rs. 212,980 Rs.7,320 Rs.61 8 B-Block Rs. 531,164 Rs.17,040 Rs. 141 1 9 E-Block Rs. 291,434 Rs.9,360 Rs.78 10 F-Block Rs. 728,112 Rs.24,480 Rs. 204 11 Madina Clony Rs. 583,874 Rs.18,720 Rs. 156 Sheikh, 12 Rehmania etc. Rs. 739,860 Rs.27,600 Rs. 230 13 Liaqat Pura Rs.1,324,017 Rs.43,200 Rs. 360 15 Goal Chowk Rs. 94,307 Rs.2,040 17 16 C-Block Rs. 559,981 Rs.8,220 Rs. 137 2 17 D-Block Rs. 769,791 Rs.12,600 Rs. 210 3 18 G-Block Rs.1,957,152 Rs.24,600 Rs. 410 4 19 H-Block Rs. 352,310 Rs.4,920 Rs.82 9 General Bus 20 Stand Rs. 261,429 Rs.1,800 Rs.13 18 21 Shaheen Market Rs. 75,876 Rs. 480 Rs. 8 3 22 Club Road Rs. 53,076 Rs.1,260 Rs.21 3

30

1 2 3 4 5 6

Block

Rate

Sr. No.

Domestic

Arrear of

Connection

Commercial

Arrear Water Sewerage Tax

Name of

23 Danewal Rs.1,742,114 Rs.25,320 Rs. 422 3 24 Sharqi Colony Rs.1,145,210 Rs.27,660 Rs. 461 3 26 9/WB Rs.1,592,790 Rs.16,560 Rs. 550 27 11/WB Rs.3,245,993 Rs.24,630 Rs. 1,248 28 Muslim Town Rs. 322,530 Rs.3,330 Rs. 114 29 Anwar Abad Rs. 355,090 Rs.2,880 Rs.96 Total Rs. 21,445,297 Rs. 388,148 Rs. 6,404 Total 3+4+5 Rs. 21,839,849

31

Annexure-F

[Para No.1.2.2.3]

Non-Recovery of Outstanding Dues against Various Contractors and Other Individuals –Rs 13. 014 million

(Amount in Rupees) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT 1 1974-75 168.56 31 1964-65 413.66 81 917.00

2 1974-75 80.00 32 811.00 82 1980 4,335.00

3 1945-46 73.75 33 660.00 83 1,260.65

4 1945-46 23.37 34 11,050.00 84 744.00

5 1945-46 40.31 35 82,500.00 85 58.00

6 1945-46 17.25 36 1,800.00 86 7,371.00

7 1945-46 16,426.00 37 30.51 87 462.78

8 1974-75 2,194.49 38 1,119.00 88 15,100.00

9 1974-75 320.00 39 1966-67 251.25 89 30,200.00

10 1974-75 14.00 40 150.00 90 387.00

11 1974-75 22,610.44 41 5,000.00 121 1985 20,000.00

12 510.81 42 5,170.00 122 1985 616.00

13 19,418.00 43 2,500.00 123 1985 381.21

14 550.00 44 2,000.00 124 1,246.35

15 1,076.00 45 1,000.00 125 1,334.10

16 1,215.75 46 2,442.25 126 806.31

17 1,133.00 47 15,000.00 127 1985 35,000.00

18 1978-79 40,000.00 48 9,000.00 128 1985 7,000.00

19 1978-79 875.00 49 21,461.00 129 1985 7,560.00

20 1974-75 201.00 50 7,850.00 130 1985 3,825.00

21 1974-75 15,000.00 51 500.00 132 1986 74.00

32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT 22 1974-75 72,894.38 52 500.00 133 1986 5,000.00

23 1974-75 15,932.32 53 20,000.00 134 1986 560,440.00

24 1974-75 894.89 54 500.00 135 1986 27,400.00

25 1974-75 11,030.76 55 17,500.00 136 1986 2,000.00

26 1974-75 4,808.11 56 8,530.00 137 1986 2,000.00

27 1974-75 27,589.95 57 4,779.41 138 3,000.00

28 1974-75 66.32 58 300.00 139 1986 5,000.00

29 1974-75 6,620.00 59 360.00 140 1984 10,000.00

30 1974-75 225.04 60 1,970.84 141 1984 3,000.00

61 1,752.91 91 172.00 142 2,017.00

62 7,698.00 92 142.00 143 1986 1,000.00

63 3,434.63 93 579.00 144 1986 2,000.00

64 4,095.84 94 140.00 145 1986 3,000.00

65 2,009.40 95 25,000.00 146 1986 6,000.00

66 10,248.00 96 700.00 147 107,156.00

67 3,005.66 97 1,000.00 148 1986 16,294.00

68 3,928.19 98 3,808.00 149 1986 2,000.00

69 150.00 99 25,000.00 150 1986 55,000.00

70 3,500.00 100 10,000.00 151 1987 8,000.00

71 120,000.00 101 1,000.00 182 1990 100,000.00

72 105.00 102 69,750.00 183 1990 5,790.00

73 18,000.00 103 2,000.00 184 1990 2,490.00

74 21,800.00 104 6,000.00 185 1990 52,500.00

75 93.20 105 1,000.00 186 1990 14,000.00

76 97.00 106 100,000.00 187 68,679.00

77 40,000.00 107 68,069.00 188 1990 28,546.00

78 4,990.00 108 57,510.00 189 934.23

79 150,000.00 109 1982-83 50.00 190 181.32

33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT 80 1980 200.00 110 267.40 191 901.84

111 1984 5,000.00 192 211.60 224 1998 500,000.00

112 1985 50,000.00 193 332.90 225 1998 5,000.00

113 1985 58,000.00 194 1990 6,000.00 226 19,600.00

114 1985 2,000.00 195 1990 6,000.00 227 1998 118,743.00 115 1985 2,000.00 196 1991 224,000.00 228 1998 94,175.00 116 1985 3,000.00 197 1991 196,000.00 229 1998 3,000,000.00 117 3,000.00 198 1991 2,000.00 230 1998 10,000.00

118 13,000.00 199 1991 35,000.00 231 1999 3,000.00

119 1985 20,000.00 200 1991 3,000.00 232 1999 2,000.00 120 1985 73,900.00 201 1991 39,622.00 233 1999 5,000.00 152 835.11 202 1991 37,300.00 234 1999 10,000.00

153 80,000.00 203 1993 40,617.00 235 1999 5,000.00

154 1987 47,647.00 204 16,890.00 236 1999 5,000.00

155 1987 3,000.00 205 1,145.00 237 1999 5,000.00

156 1987 2,900.00 206 859.00 238 1999 5,000.00

157 1987 40,000.00 207 1,500.00 239 1999 5,000.00

158 1987 40,000.00 208 83,820.00 240 1999 3,000.00

159 38,702.00 209 15,000.00 241 1999 2,340.00

160 1987 3,000.00 210 1995 5,400.00 276 2003 3,920.00 161 1987 1,680.00 211 329.00 277 10,434.00

162 1987 50,000.00 242 1999 3,000.00 279 2004 138,680.00 163 1987 40,000.00 243 1999 5,000.00 280 20,000.00

164 50,000.00 244 1999 10,000.00 281 2004 2,800.00

165 40,000.00 245 1999 10,000.00 282 2004 3,400.00

166 9,308.00 246 2000 10,000.00 285 2004 159,660.00

167 1988 2,000.00 247 2000 12,900.00 287 212,010.00

168 1989 50,000.00 248 2001 7,500.00 289 2005 3,400.00

34

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT 169 50,000.00 249 2001 4,290.00 291 2005 1,200.00

170 50,000.00 250 1,250.00 293 2005 5,600.00

171 50,000.00 251 11,000.00 297 2006 131,770.00

172 1988 2,500.00 252 5,000.00 303 2005 10,000.00

173 1988 1,762.00 253 2001 3,792.00 305 2006 132,360.00 174 1989 6,000.00 254 2001 1,250.00 308 2006 3,770.00 175 1989 38,000.00 255 2001 5,000.00 311 2006 3,970.00 176 1989 62,000.00 256 2001 5,600.00 314 2006 187,300.00 177 1989 1,155.00 260 2002 47,100.00 318 2006 2,000.00

178 1989 44,520.00 261 679.00 322 2006 3,400.00

179 1989 100,000.00 262 473.00 326 2006 18,480.00

180 1990 100,000.00 263 2002 19,460.00 333 2006 224,290.00

181 1990 100,000.00 264 2002 4,300.00 334 2006 173,930.00 212 1995 2,330.00 265 2002 5,500.00 339 2006 10,000.00 213 1996 636,000.00 266 2002 1,540.00 349 2007 10,000.00 214 303,492.00 267 2002 3,037.00 352 2007 19,250.00

215 1996 1,596.00 268 2003 5,500.00 354 2007 240,000.00 216 1996 740.00 269 2003 5,500.00 355 2007 61,290.00 217 1996 80,000.00 271 2003 5,500.00 363 2007 79,930.00

218 1997 5,000.00 272 2003 1,500.00 374 2007 10,280.00 219 1997 1,300.00 273 2003 3,400.00 376 2007 3,400.00 220 1998 3,500.00 274 2003 22,000.00 457 2012 6,440.00 221 1998 3,500.00 275 2003 5,500.00 462 2012 10,680.00 222 1998 3,000.00 387 2008 3,400.00 463 2012 10,680.00 223 1998 3,000.00 393 2008 429,925.00 464 2012 10,680.00 396 2008 40,000.00 465 2012 10,680.00 440 2011 168,400.00 401 2008 4,800.00 466 2012 30,000.00 443 2011 10,000.00 407 2008 5,000.00 467 2012 20,000.00 447 2011 20,000.00

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT Sr. # YEAR AMOUNT 408 2009 28,500.00 468 2012 30,000.00 450 2011 240,500.00 426 2009 9,500.00 469 2012 20,000.00 452 2011 10,000.00 427 2010 9,500.00 470 2012 20,000.00 454 2011 7,660.00 437 2010 5,800.00 471 2012 20,000.00 455 2011 246,000.00 474 2012 6,440.00 472 2012 20,000.00 456 2011 6,440.00

475 2012 20,000.00 473 2012 6,440.00 476 2012 5,000.00

477 2012 30,000.00

Total 3,195,024.44 Total 2,149,378.82 Total 7,669,869.79

Grand Total of Column No.3+6+9 13,014,273.05

36

Annexure –G [Para No.1.2.2.4] Non-recovery of Commercialization / Conversion, Map, and Form Fee –Rs 3.917 million (Amount in Rupees)

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 1 Muhammad 470 07/03/11 Grain C 2 0 50 4000 4050 Jameel S/o Market Chand Khan 2 Sajjad 471 07/03/11 Iftkhar R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Hussain Block Sajid S/o Muhammad Hussain 3 Muhammad 472 07/08/11 Khanewal Ind. 25 8000 50 2500 10550 Aslam Road Gondal 4 Muhammad 473 07/08/11 Paki C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 Saddique More S/o Bashir Ahmad 5 Allah Ditta 474 19/7/2011 Ada C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 Sethi Chakrala 6 Muhammad 475 28/7/2011 Danewal R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Saeed 7 Zaheer 476 28/7/2011 Lal Zar R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad S/o Colony Muhammad Sharif 8 Muhammad 477 08/02/11 Danewal R 6 0 50 1200 1250 Saeed Zafar S/o Abdul Haq

37

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 9 Muhammad 478 08/02/11 Kachi R 14 0 50 2800 2850 Amin, Abadi Muhammad Shafiq S/o Ghulam Rasool 10 Ch. 479 08/08/11 Club C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 Mubarak Road Ali 11 Abdul 480 08/10/11 Al-Jannat R 20 0 50 4000 4050 Sattar S/o Colony Qamar Din 12 Shafeeq 481 18/8/2011 11/W.B R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad 13 Muhammad 482 23/8/2011 Thingi C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 Sarwar S/o Ada Muhammad Hussain 14 Sheikh 483 30/8/2011 Faisal R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Abdul Colony Razaq 15 Attiq Sethi 484 30/8/2011 Multan C 3 4500 50 6000 10550 Road 16 Allah Ditta 485 09/08/11 Railway C 3 0 50 6000 6050 S/o Akbar Station Ali 17 Muhammad 486 13/9/2011 Chanu C 3 4500 50 6000 10550 Hussain Road 18 Muhammad 487 13/9/2011 Bhatta C 5 7500 50 10000 17550 Abid Road 19 Nawab Din 488 19/9/2011 Near PSO C 2 0 50 4000 4050 S/o Fateh Muhammad 20 Mehraj Din 489 20/9/2011 Wahadat R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Park 21 Muhammad 490 26/9/2011 Wahadat R 6 0 50 1200 1250 Akhtar Park

38

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 22 Muhammad 491 26/9/2011 Thingi C 3 4500 50 6000 10550 Sarwar S/o Ada Muhammad Hussain 23 Abdul 492 28/9/2011 Godown C 1 0 50 2000 2050 Qaim S/o Call tax Abdul Aziz 24 Muhammad 493 30/9/2011 Lal Zar R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Nadeem Colony 25 Abdul 494 30/9/2011 11/W.B R 7 0 50 1400 1450 Qaim S/o Abdul Aziz 26 Hajaran 495 30/9/2011 Lal Zar R 5 0 50 1000 1050 Bibi W/o Colony M. Arshad 27 Farkhanda 496 30/9/2011 Ada C 7 10500 50 14000 24550 Bibi W/o Machiwal Muhammad Tahir 28 Javed Iqbal 497 30/9/2011 Ada C 7 10500 50 14000 24550 S/o Machiwal Muhammad Iqbal 29 Rukshanda 9000 50 12000 21050 Bibi D/o Ada 498 30/9/2011 C 6 Muhammad Machiwal Iqbal 30 Mehmood 0 50 3000 3050 ul Hassan 32- S/o 499 13/10/2011 Quarter R 15 Muhammad Road Hussain 31 Muhammad 4500 50 6000 10550 Elam S/o 500 13/10/2011 B-Block C 3 Gulzar Ahmad 32 Muhammad 7500 50 10000 17550 501 20/10/2011 535/E.B C 5 Tariq 39

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 33 Haji Khalid 10500 50 14000 24550 502 20/10/2011 527/E.B C 7 Javed 34 Waris S/o 10500 50 14000 24550 Zaheer Noor 503 20/10/2011 C 7 Nagir Ahmad 35 Haji M. Muslim 15000 50 20000 35050 504 22/10/2011 C 10 Ashraf Town 36 Farooq Anwar 0 50 3000 3050 505 25/10/2011 R 15 Ahmad Abad 37 Abdul 1500 50 2000 3550 Club Majeed S/o 506 25/10/2011 C 1 Road Fazal Din 38 Tariq Hanif 0 50 2000 2050 S/o Goal 507 27/10/2011 C 1 Muhammad Chowk Hanif 39 Mst. 0 50 1600 1650 Shahzadi Lala Zar W/o 508 27/10/2011 R 8 Colony Muhammad Shahid 40 Sheikh 0 50 1200 1250 Abrar Ali 509 27/10/2011 R 6 Cotton 41 Naeem 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad S/o Muslim 510 28/10/2011 R 5 Bashir Town Ahmad 42 Mst. 0 50 2000 2050 Goal Khurshid 510 28/10/2011 C 1 Chowk Bibi 43 Muhammad Lala Zar 0 50 1400 1450 511 11/01/11 R 7 Aslam Colony 44 Muhammad 0 50 1200 1250 Amin S/o Canal 512 11/01/11 R 6 Muhammad View Yaseen 45 Muhammad Lala Zar 0 50 1000 1050 513 11/04/11 R 5 Hanif S/o Colony 40

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion Haji Muhammad Din 46 Abdul 0 50 1400 1450 Canal Razaq S/o 514 11/12/11 R 7 View Jalal Din 47 Rana 7500 50 10000 17550 Dilshad S/o 515 18/11/2011 174/W.B C 5 Muhammad Saddique 48 Munwar 15000 50 20000 35050 Ada Iqbal S/o 516 18/11/2011 Ghulam C 10 Muhammad Hussain Rafiq 49 Maqbool 12000 50 16000 28050 Ada Hussain S/o 517 18/11/2011 Ghulam C 8 Mohabat Hussain Khan 50 Ray Ada 18000 50 24000 42050 Shoukat S/o 518 18/11/2011 Ghulam C 12 Haji Waliat Hussain 51 Mian 10500 50 14000 24550 Ada Tanveer / 519 18/11/2011 Ghulam C 7 Abdul Hussain Jabbar 52 College 0 50 1000 1050 Hafiz Abrar 520 26/11/2011 R 5 Town 53 Ghulam 0 50 1000 1050 Subhani S/o 521 26/11/2011 Danewal R 5 Faqeer Muhammad 54 Haji 0 50 2600 2650 Muhammad 522 26/11/2011 F-Block R 13 Naveed Akhtar 55 Haji Wahadat 0 50 1000 1050 523 26/11/2011 R 5 Shamshad Colony

41

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 56 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Jabbar S/o Al-Jannat 524 26/11/2011 R 5 Muhammad Colony Ali 57 Sajid Imran 0 50 1400 1450 Al-Jannat S/o Munir 525 26/11/2011 R 7 Colony Ahmad 58 9/W.B 3000 50 4000 7050 Muhammad 526 28/11/2011 Main C 2 Altaf Road 59 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Saeed, Mushtaq Muslim 527 30/11/2011 R 5 Ahmad S/o Town Jaan Muhammad 60 Muhammad 0 50 1200 1250 Mushtaq Iftkhar 528 30/11/2011 R 6 S/o Allah Block Bukhsh 61 Abdul Green 0 50 1000 1050 529 30/11/2011 R 5 Jabbar Town 62 Asghar Ali 0 50 1000 1050 , Green 530 30/11/2011 R 5 Muhammad Town Arshad 63 Iftkhar 0 50 600 650 Safdar Ali 531 12/07/11 R 3 Block 64 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Ejaz S/o Iftkhar 532 12/07/11 R 5 Muhammad Block Sadiq 65 Munir 30000 50 40000 70050 Ahmed S/o 533 12/07/11 63/W.B C 20 Lal Muhammad 66 Muhammad College 0 50 600 650 534 12/12/11 R 3 Haji Akhtar Town 42

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion S/o Ghulam Qadir 67 Ghulam 0 50 1000 1050 Abbas S/o Canal 535 12/12/11 R 5 Mukhtar View Ahmad 68 Dr. 660000 50 880000 1540050 Punjab Muhammad 536 12/12/11 C 440 College Rafiq 69 Ahsan 0 50 1000 1050 New Khan S/o 537 14/12/2011 Sharqi R 5 Muhammad Colony Nawaz 70 Rashid 0 50 1000 1050 Mehmood Faisal 538 14/12/2011 R 5 S/o Lal Town Khan 71 Shamshad 10500 50 14000 24550 Ahmad S/o 539 14/12/2011 481/E.B C 7 Muhammad Rafiq 72 Muhammad 8000 50 32000 40050 540 14/12/2011 558/K.B Ind. 320 Aslam 73 Imran S/o 3000 50 4000 7050 Ada Muhammad 541 24/12/2011 C 2 27/W.B Mansha 74 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 Younis S/o Ada 542 24/12/2011 C 2 Abdul 27/W.B Hameed 75 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Aslam S/o Canal 543 28/12/2011 R 5 Bashir View Ahmad 76 Haji 0 50 1400 1450 Canal Muhammad 544 28/12/2011 R 7 View Abbas

43

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 77 Yahiya Canal 0 50 1200 1250 545 28/12/2011 R 6 Khan View 78 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Muslim Ramzan S/o 546 28/12/2011 R 5 Town Suleiman 79 Abdul 0 50 1000 1050 College Jabbar S/o 547 28/12/2011 R 5 Town Basit Ali 80 Pervez 0 50 800 850 College Iqbal S/o 548 01/04/12 R 4 Town Chragh Din 81 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Danewal Ashraf S/o 549 01/04/12 R 5 Town Ahmad Ali 82 Zafar Bhatti 550 01/04/12 A-Block C 10 15000 50 20000 35050 83 Muhammad 0 50 1400 1450 New Address S/o 551 01/04/12 Sharqi R 7 Muhammad Colony Saddique 84 Mumtaz Wahadat 4500 50 6000 10550 552 01/07/12 C 3 Hussain Colony 85 Muhammad Peer 1500 50 2000 3550 553 01/07/12 C 1 Ashfaq Murad 86 Wahadat 0 50 1000 1050 Ali Rauf 554 01/07/12 R 5 Colony 87 Kashif 0 50 1000 1050 Naeem S/o Lala Zar 555 17/1/2012 R 5 Nazir Colony Ahmad 88 Masawar 10500 50 14000 24550 Zaheer Hussain S/o 556 21/1/2012 C 7 Nagir Niaz Khan 89 Liaqat Ali 557 21/1/2012 G-Block R 3 0 50 600 650 90 Haji Asmat Faisal 0 50 3000 3050 558 21/2/2012 R 15 Ullah Town 91 Alam Bibi Zahid 0 50 2000 2050 559 21/1/2012 C 1 W/o Abdul Market 44

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion Hakim 92 Muhammad Ajmari 50 11050 560 21/1/2012 Colony 160 8000 3000 Arshad Block 93 Rana Civil 50 19050 Muhammad 561 21/1/2012 Hospital Colony 320 16000 3000 Yaseen Luddan 94 Muhammad Faisal 0 50 600 650 562 23/1/2012 R 3 Shahid Town 95 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Ramzan S/o Al-Jannat 563 23/1/2012 R 5 Fareed Colony Muhammad 96 Muhammad 0 50 600 650 Akram / 564 23/1/2012 Danewal R 3 Ghulam Rasool 97 Ghazanfar Iftkhar 0 50 1000 1050 565 23/1/2012 R 5 Ali Block 98 9/W.B 1500 50 2000 3550 Abdul 566 23/1/2012 Joyian C 1 Majeed Wala 99 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Atif S/o Muslim 567 25/1/2012 R 5 Muhammad Town Sadiq 100 Haji Atta 0 50 1200 1250 Muhammad Muslim 569 25/1/2012 R 6 S/o Ghulam Town Muhammad 101 Dilbar 0 50 1000 1050 Hussain, Mukhtar Muslim 570 25/1/2012 R 5 Ahmad S/o Town Noor Ahmad 102 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Muslim Ibrahim S/o 571 25/1/2012 R 5 Town Siraj Din 45

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 103 Mubeen 0 50 1200 1250 Lala Zar Ahmad S/o 572 02/02/12 R 6 Colony Qasim 104 Waseem 0 50 1600 1650 Khan S/o Lala Zar Muhammad 573 02/02/12 R 8 Colony Nawaz Khan 105 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 Khanewal Pervez 574 02/08/12 C 2 Road Bhatti 106 Rana 1500 50 2000 3550 Multan Asghar Ali 575 02/11/12 C 1 Road Khan 107 Waheed 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad S/o College 576 02/11/12 R 5 Muhammad Town Shafi 108 Abdul College 0 50 1000 1050 577 02/11/12 R 5 Majeed Town 109 Muhammad College 0 50 800 850 578 02/11/12 R 4 Yousaf Town 110 Sheikh 0 50 600 650 Faisal Abdul 579 02/11/12 R 3 Town Razaq 111 Shahzad , Old Lari 0 50 6050 580 15/2/2012 C 3 6000 Imtiaz Ada 112 Babar Luddan 0 50 2000 2050 581 15/2/2012 R 10 Ashraf Road 113 Shahab Din 4500 50 6000 10550 S/o 582 15/2/2012 A-Block C 3 Muhammad Ibrahim 114 Mushtaq Faisal 0 50 1000 1050 583 18/2/2012 R 5 Ahmad Town 115 Hafiz 0 50 1400 1450 Faisal Muhammad 584 18/2/2012 R 7 Town Musa 46

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 116 Rao Taib 0 50 800 850 S/o Sheikh 585 18/2/2012 R 4 Muhammad Cotton Jameel 117 Muhammad 240000 50 320000 560050 Ameer S/o Luddan 586 21/2/2012 C 160 Ghulam Road Qadir 118 Syed 4500 50 6000 10550 Muhammad Aslam Shah Luddan 587 21/2/2012 C 3 S/o Bashir Road Ahmad Shah 119 Waqas S/o 0 50 800 850 Muslim Fiaz ul 588 22/2/2012 R 4 Town Hassan 120 Sheikh 0 50 600 650 Sheikh Abdul 589 23/2/2012 R 3 Cotton Razaq 121 Wahadat 0 50 1000 1050 Niamat Ali 590 23/2/2012 R 5 Colony 122 Saidan 0 50 600 650 Wahadat Sana 591 23/2/2012 R 3 Colony Bukhari 123 Rasheed Ratta 1500 50 2000 3550 Ahmad S/o Tibba, 592 03/01/12 C 1 Faqeer Paki Hussain More 124 Ch. 8000 50 32000 40050 Muhammad Paki Saleem S/o 593 03/01/12 Ind. 320 More Bashir Ahmad 125 Shoukat Ali 594 03/01/12 Sahil City C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 126 Talha Factory 0 50 600 650 Naeem, 595 03/05/12 Haji R 3 Taib Qasim 47

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 127 Talib 0 50 1000 1050 Hussain 596 03/05/12 Sahil City R 5 Shah 128 Haji 0 50 1000 1050 Lala Zar Muhammad 597 03/12/12 R 5 Colony Saeed 129 Rao 0 50 1200 1250 College Muhammad 598 03/12/12 R 6 Town Saleem 130 Sheikh 0 50 1000 1050 Muhammad 599 15/2/2012 G-Block R 5 Naseer 131 Sheikh 0 50 600 650 Madina Muhammad 600 15/3/2012 R 3 Colony Naseer 132 Muhammad Iftkhar 0 50 1000 1050 601 15/3/2012 R 5 Arshad Block 133 Zahid Ali 0 50 1200 1250 S/o Iftkhar 602 15/3/2012 R 6 Muhammad Block Hanif 134 Ch. Bashir 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad, Madina Mst. 603 15/3/2012 R 5 Colony Khurshid Begum 135 Iftkhar 0 50 800 850 Rashid Ali 604 20/3/2012 R 4 Block 136 Muhammad Muslim 0 50 1400 1450 605 21/3/2012 R 7 Saleem Town 137 Muhammad Muslim 0 50 1000 1050 606 22/3/2012 R 5 Zahid Town 138 Mehar 0 50 600 650 Ghulam Maluka 607 21-3-2012 R 3 Shabir S/o Chowk Azmat Ali 139 Haji Faqeer Multan 45000 50 60000 105050 608 22/3/2012 C 30 Muhammad Road 48

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 140 Falak Sher Ada 3000 50 4000 7050 609 22/3/2012 C 2 Rehan Chakrala 141 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 Ada Jameel S/o 610 22/3/2012 C 2 Thingi Ali Nawaz 142 Malik 56 Buda 4500 50 6000 10550 Ashfaq 611 22/3/2012 Wala C 3 Lurka Road 143 Muhammad 56 Buda 3000 50 4000 7050 Aslam S/o 612 22/3/2012 Wala C 2 Rab Nawaz Road 144 Haji 1500 50 2000 3550 56 Buda Muhammad 613 22/3/2012 Wala C 1 Shafi Road Baloach 145 48 Pul 3000 50 4000 7050 Haji Nazir 614 22/3/2012 C 2 Road 146 Muhammad 0 50 600 650 Anwar Iqbal S/o 615 26-03-2012 R 3 Abad Barket Ali 147 Muhammad 1500 50 2000 3550 616 27/3/2012 A-Block C 1 Nadeem 148 Muhammad Iftkhar 0 50 1000 1050 617 27/3/2012 R 5 Ramzan Block 149 Mehar 30000 50 40000 70050 Muhammad Nawaz W/o 618 31/3/2012 206/E.B C 20 Jewan Khan 150 Muhammad 45000 50 60000 105050 619 31/3/2012 212/E.B C 30 Sajid 151 Ghulam 0 50 4050 Rasool S/o Old Lari 620 04/02/12 C 2 4000 Fiaz Ada Muhammad 152 Muhammad Ratta 0 50 1000 1050 Eshan S/o 621 04/02/12 Tibba, R 5 Rafaqat Ali Paki 49

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion More

153 Ratta 0 50 800 850 Muhammad Tibba, 622 04/02/12 R 4 Sharif Paki More 154 Abdul 8000 50 32000 40050 Ghaffar S/o 623 04/02/12 573/E.B Ind 320 Muhammad Munshi 155 Muhammad 8000 50 30000 38050 624 04/02/12 547/E.B Ind 300 Naeem 156 Faqeer 3000 50 4000 7050 Hussain, Machiwal 625 04/02/12 C 2 Malik Road Manzoor 157 Malik 3000 50 4000 7050 Suleiman / Ada 626 04/02/12 C 2 Malik Machiwal Rustam 158 Mehmood Machiwal 1500 50 2000 3550 627 04/02/12 C 1 Hussain Road 159 Maka 0 50 1000 1050 Rana Sajid 628 04/05/12 R 5 Town 160 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 Al-Jannat Ramzan 629 04/05/12 R 4 Colony Joyia 161 Muhammad Al-Jannat 0 50 1000 1050 630 04/05/12 R 5 Akhtar Colony 162 Ghulam 0 50 1200 1250 Abbas S/o College 631 04/07/12 R 6 Sultan Town Mehmood 163 Muhammad Iftkhar 0 50 1400 1450 632 04/07/12 R 7 Afzal Block 164 Muhammad Iftkhar 0 50 1000 1050 633 04/07/12 R 5 Ashraf Block

50

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 165 Fiaz Rasool 0 50 200 250 Muslim S/o Bashir 634 04/09/12 R 1 Town Ahmad 166 Mujahid 6000 50 8000 14050 S/o 9-Joyian 635 04/09/12 C 4 Saddique Wala Jutt 167 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Jameel S/o Muslim 636 04/09/12 R 5 Abdul Town Ghani 168 Muhammad Muslim 0 50 1200 1250 637 04/09/12 R 6 Akhtar Town 169 Nazir 0 50 800 850 Ahmad S/o Muslim 638 04/09/12 R 4 Muhammad Town Azeem 170 Kachi 0 50 1400 1450 Imran S/o Mandi Muhammad 639 04/10/12 R 7 Liaqat Akram Pura 171 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Faisal Khan S/o 640 04/10/12 R 5 Town Elam Din 172 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 Hanif S/o College 641 04/10/12 C 2 Ahmad Town Bukhsh 173 Naimat 0 50 1200 1250 Ullah S/o College 642 04/10/12 R 6 Jaan Town Muhammad 174 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 Rafiq S/o College 643 04/10/12 R 4 Abdul Town Majeed 175 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 644 14/4/2012 27/W.B C 2 Nadeem 51

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion Bhatti 176 Ch. 8000 50 28000 36050 Muhammad 645 14/4/2012 Fiaz Wah Ind. 280 Alam 177 Ch. 8000 50 36000 44050 Muhammad Katcha 646 14/4/2012 Ind. 360 Illyas Bangla Bandisha 178 Haji Allah Mouza 3000 50 4000 7050 647 14/4/2012 C 2 Dad Luddan 179 Nasar 1500 50 2000 3550 Ahmad S/o Shell 648 14/4/2012 C 1 Muhammad Pump Sarwar 180 Allah Yar Shell 1500 50 2000 3550 649 14/4/2012 C 1 Rehmani Pump 181 Haq Nawaz 3000 50 4000 7050 Kachi S/o Haji 650 14/4/2012 Paki C 2 Imam Road Bukhsh 182 Muhammad 15000 50 20000 35050 Luddan Illyas 651 14/4/2012 C 10 Road Bandisha 183 Muhammad 1500 50 2000 3550 Hussain S/o Karam 652 14/4/2012 C 1 Zahoor Pur Road Hussain 184 Karam 1500 50 2000 3550 Rana Fiaz 653 14/4/2012 C 1 Pur Road 185 Allah 1500 50 2000 3550 Karam Rakha 654 14/4/2012 C 1 Pur Road Rajana 186 Abdul 0 50 600 650 655 16/4/2012 Sahil City R 3 Ghani 187 Abdul 7500 50 10000 17550 656 17/4/2012 A-Block C 5 Majeed 188 Muhammad Khanewal 3000 50 4000 7050 657 17/4/2012 C 2 Munir Road 52

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 189 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Naeem S/o Muslim 658 17/4/2012 R 5 Muhammad Town Ali 190 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 Bashir S/o Muslim 659 17/4/2012 R 4 Sher Town Muhammad 191 Mehar ul 0 50 1000 1050 Sirhind Nisa W/o 660 17/4/2012 R 5 Colony Abdul Aziz 192 Haji 0 50 400 450 Muhammad Jinnah Shafi Tarrar 661 18/4/2012 R 2 Road S/o Allah Dad 193 Muhammad 0 50 600 650 Nawaz 662 19/4/2012 D-Block R 3 Joyia 194 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Ashiq S/o 663 19/4/2012 Danewal R 5 Dara 195 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 664 19/4/2012 Danewal R 4 Zubair 196 Haji Tufail 0 50 2000 2050 Waraich Faisal 665 21/4/2012 R 10 S/o Nazi Town Ahmad 197 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Imran S/o Madina 666 21/4/2012 R 5 Muhammad Colony Bilal 198 Kashif 0 50 1400 1450 667 26/4/2012 F-Block R 7 Khan 199 Nazir 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad S/o Muslim 668 26/4/2012 R 5 Wazir Town Ahmad 53

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion 200 Muhammad 4500 50 6000 10550 Subhan S/o 9-Joyian 669 26/4/2012 C 3 Muhammad Wala Shafi 201 Munir Lala Zar 0 50 1000 1050 670 26/4/2012 R 5 Hussain Colony 202 Mian 1500 50 2000 3550 Rehmat 671 26/4/2012 A-Block C 1 Allah Nasir 203 Muhammad 3000 50 4000 7050 672 28/4/2012 A-Block C 2 Iqbal 204 Shakeel 0 50 1000 1050 Ahmad S/o Lala Zar 673 28/4/2012 R 5 Muhammad Colony Aslam 205 Muhammad 0 50 1000 1050 Irfan S/o Maluka 674 28/4/2012 R 5 Muhammad Chowk Suba 206 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 Imran S/o College 675 05/02/12 R 4 Muhammad Town Yousaf 207 College 3000 50 4000 7050 Shafqat 676 05/02/12 C 2 Town 208 Muhammad College 0 50 1000 1050 677 05/03/12 R 5 Ramzan Town 209 Muhammad Shahzad 0 50 1000 1050 Aslam S/o 678 05/03/12 Stamp R 5 Falak Sher Vindor 210 Qasim College 0 50 1000 1050 679 05/03/12 R 5 Senhar Town 211 Dilbar College 0 50 600 650 680 05/03/12 R 3 Tahir Town 212 Nawab S/o Lala Zar 0 50 1000 1050 681 05/05/12 R 5 Shoukat Colony 213 Saeed Muslim 0 50 1000 1050 682 05/05/12 R 5 Bhatti S/o Town 54

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion Muhammad Iqbal 214 Muhammad 0 50 800 850 Muslim Saddique 683 05/05/12 R 4 Town S/o Bahoo 215 Qari Abdul Ghafoor 0 50 1400 1450 684 05/05/12 R 7 Hameed Town 216 Zafar Iqbal 685 05/05/12 11/W.B C 2 3000 50 4000 7050 217 New 0 50 1400 1450 Abdullah 686 05/09/12 Sharqi R 7 Colony 218 New 0 50 1200 1250 Shafeeq 687 05/09/12 Sharqi R 6 Colony 219 Allah Al-Jannat 0 50 1000 1050 688 05/12/12 R 5 Rakha Colony 220 Haji M. 4500 50 6000 10550 Ishaq S/o Machiwal 689 16/05/2012 C 3 Muhammad Road Din 221 Malik Bure 3000 50 4000 7050 Rustam 690 16/5/2012 Wala C 2 Langrial Road 222 Shahbaz, 3000 50 4000 7050 Ejaz S/o Machiwal 691 16/5/2012 C 2 Muhammad Road Latif 223 Ratta 3000 50 4000 7050 Muhammad Tibba, 692 17/5/2012 C 2 Zahid Paki More 224 Muhammad Civil 45000 50 60000 105050 Illyas 693 17/5/2012 Hospital C 30 Bandisha Luddan 225 Mukhtar Habib 3000 50 4000 7050 Khan 694 15/5/2012 Bank C 2 Doltana Luddan 55

Rates Per Marla = Residential Land @ Rs.200 Commercial @ Rs.@ Rs.2000 Industrial @ Rs.100 Map Fee

Rs.3000 Farm Fee Rs.50 in each case Notice Fee Rs.25 in Each case

Date

Total

Marla

mmercial

Names

Sr. No.

SiteNo.

Map Fee

Form Fee

Co

Residential /

Commercial Fee

Minimum Area inMinimum Area

Notice No.Notice TO/P&C Minimum / Conversion Road

226 Mian 3000 50 4000 7050 Mukhtar 695 17/5/2012 Luddan C 2 Doltana 227 Main 3000 50 4000 7050 Malik 696 17/5/2012 Bazar C 2 Feroz Luddan 228 Muhammad UBL 15000 50 20000 35050 Shah S/o 697 17/5/2012 Bank C 10 Fida Shah Luddan 229 UBL 1500 50 2000 3550 Dr. Amjad 698 17/5/2012 Bank C 1 Gujjar Luddan 230 Haji 1500 50 2000 3550 Maqbool Ahmad S/o Karam 699 17/5/2012 C 1 Hafiz Pur Road Muhammad Ishaq 231 Muhammad Ada 4500 50 6000 10550 700 17/5/2012 C 3 Amin 32/W.B Total 3916650

56

Annexure-H

[Para No.1.2.2.5]

Non-recovery of Outstanding Dues of Development Charges of Kachi Abadies - Rs 3.869 million

(Amount in Rupees)

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. (1) LIAQAT PURA Muhammad Hussain S/o 1 34 34 1-Marla, 4-Sarsis Rs. 834 Muhammad Rafiq Bhatti Muhammad Rasheed S/o 2 242 243 3-Marlas Rs.1,729 Maqbool Hussain Muhammad Ismail S/o 3 267 269 3-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,795 Qutab Ali Ghulam Qadir S/o Sultan 4 295 297 6-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 11,616 Muhammad 5 399 Rorer S/o Jamal Din 403 3-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.1,858 6 447 Allah Ditta S/o Karam Din 451 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 12,334 M. Hanif, Gulzar Hussain, 7 449 Shabir Hussain, Ghulam 453 9-Marlas Rs.5,187 Rasool, Khurshid Bibi Widow 8 455 459 3-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.2,051 Naseeb Ahmad Fazal Kareem S/o M. 9 6 477 25-Marlas Rs.133,882 Abdullah (2) MASANI BAGH Rs. - Akbari Widow Jang Sher, 1 4 Sarfraz, Umar Daraz, M. 7 7-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 17,002 Riaz, Fiaz Ahmad, etc. Ali Muhammad S/o Khair 2 42 Din, M. Nawaz, Maqsood 52 13-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.7,942 S/o Ali Muhammad Abdul Majeed So Rahim 3 45 Ali, M. Bashir S/o Raham 55 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.4,386 Ali Deen Muhammad, Zafar 4 46 Yab S/o Abdul Hameed, Jali 57 8-Marlas- 7-Sarsi Rs. 23,755 Khan 57

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Ghulam Shabir S/o 5 45 56 8-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 23,755 Muhammad Saddique Abdul Hakeem, M. Salman 6 77 S/o Munshi, Hashim Ali S/o 88 8-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.4,676 Nabi Buksh Ghulam Shabir S/o 7 90 100 6-Sarsi Rs.5,735 Muhammad Saddique Fiaz Muhammad S/o 8 91 101 3-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,179 Ghulam Beck Muhammad Iqbal, 9 98 Muhammad Islam S/o 108/1 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.3,804 Suleiman (3) BHATA IKRAM-UL-HAQ Rs. - Ghulam Nabi S/o Karam 1 4 4 7-Marlas, 8-Sarsis Rs. 12,922 Din Abdul Wahab S/o Noor 2 5 5 8-Marlas, 4-Sarsis Rs. 14,852 Samand Mushtaq Ahmad S/o Shah 3 6 01-Jun 3-Marlas, 7-Sarsis Rs.2,179 Muhammad Muhammad Din S/o Noor 4 7 Muhammad, Muhammad 6 21-Marlas, 1Sarsi Rs. 34,376 Arif S/o Muhammad Din 5 8 Barket Ali S/o Amir Bukhsh 7 5-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.5,972 Muhammad Jameel S/o 6 8 71 3-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 11,284 Warham Muhammad Saddique S/o 7 11 10 20-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 58,092 Chirag Din Noor Muhammad S/o 8 14 13 4-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.2,563 Rehmat Ali Muhammad Saddique S/o 9 15 14 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,755 Hanfia 10 16 Abdul Aziz S/o Sadar Din 15 7-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 10,991 Muhammad Shaban S/o 11 17 16 8-Marlas Rs. 13,307 Muhammad Shakar Muhammad Din S/o Elam 12 19 18 5-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.5,586 Din 13 25 Raqia Bibi Widow Fazal 25 15-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 39,949 Muhammad Sharif S/o 14 26 26 3-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,923 Mehar Din

58

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Mehar Din S/o Allah Javia, 15 27 Jan-26 11-Marls, 5-Sarsi Rs. 11,170 M. Hanif S/o Mehar Din Haji Roshan Din S/o Allah 16 28 27 12-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 29,911 Javia Chirag Din S/o Nizam, 17 31 29 13-Marlas Rs. 16,188 Khurshid S/o M. Din Naika Bibi Widow Sher Muhammad, Said 18 32 30 12-Marlas Rs. 12,714 Muhammad S/o Noor Muhammad Sardar Muhammad S/o 19 33 Jan-30 7-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 10,605 Noor Muhammad Nazar Muhammad S/o Niaz 20 35 32 14-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 36,474 Ahmad Niaz Muhammad S/o 21 36 33 15-Marlas Rs. 37,632 Mureed Ahmad Sardar Muhammad S/o 22 37 34 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Bagh Muhammad Ramzan S/o 23 38 35 9-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 17,555 Kalu Mst. Ghulam Jannat D/o 24 39 36 9-Marlas Rs. 16,782 Hashim Ali 25 40 Bagh Ali S/o Chugata 37 3-Marlas, 5-Sasi Rs. 21,051 Muhammad Shafi S/o 26 41 38 13-Marlas Rs. 30,682 Hokum Din Sardar Muhammad S/o Haji 27 42 39 6-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.6,744 Roshan Din Abdul Rehman S/o Noor 28 49 46 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 20,257 Samand Muhammad Ashiq S/o 29 54 50 10-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 20,644 Rehmat Ali Imtiaz Ali S/o Ghulam 30 59 55 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Qadir Nizam S/o Bagan, Khushi Muhammad S/o Badur Din, 31 61 57 8-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.4,695 Atta Muhammad S/o Nizam Din, Hakim Ali S/o Warham Jan- Muhammad Sharif S/o 32 58 11-Marlas Rs. 23,732 63 Manga 33 65 M. Ibrahim S/o Hakim Ali 60 9-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 17,941

59

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Muhammad Ismail S/o Niaz 34 66 61 5-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.3,269 Muhammad Ghulam Din S/o Suleiman, 35 67 62 13-Marlas Rs. 16,188 M. Aslam S/o Ghulam Din 36 68 M. Saddique S/o Khair Din 63 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 12,149 Ghulam Muhammad S/o 37 69 Bahawal, Peer Bukhsh S/o 64 12-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 13,486 Ghulam Muhammad Ghulam Fareed S/o Karam 38 70 65 5-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.5,199 Din 39 72 Zulfiqar S/o Shahab 66 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.4,814 Sardar Muhammad S/o 40 73 66 6-Marlas Rs.6,357 Allah Javia Muhammad Sharif S/o Amir 41 74 67 10-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 20,644 Buksh Muhammad Hanif S/o 42 82 75 1-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 962 Chirag Din Fateh Bibi Widow Rehmat 43 86 78 5-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.4,041 Ali Muhammad Ali S/o Rehmat 44 87 79 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.7,902 Ali Muhammad Hanif S/o 45 88 80 8-Marlas Rs. 13,307 Chirag Din Muhammad Saddique S/o 46 96 88 7-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 11,377 Lahu Muhammad Yaqoob S/o 47 97 Noor Muhammad, Mukhtar 89 12-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 13,872 Ahmad S/o Noor Ahmad 48 113 Fazal Sher S/o Qutab Din 102 7-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 11,764 Abdul Hakeem S/o Jamal 49 114 103 14-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 34,544 Din 50 115 Allah Bukhsh S/o Bagh Ali 106/105 7-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 12,536 Allah Ditta S/o Noor 51 120 111 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.4,814 Muhammad Nizam Din S/o Abdul 52 121 112 15-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 39,564 Hakeem 53 122 Abdul Haq S/o Noor Din 113 11-Marlas Rs. 23,557 Jaan Muhammad S/o Elam 54 125 116 6-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.9,447 Din

60

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Muhammad Sarwar S/o 55 127 Mehar Din, Barket Ali S/o 118 9-Marlas Rs.5,187 Noor Muhammad Ramzan , Khadim S/o 56 128 119 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.4,419 Akbar 57 132 Allah Yar S/o Sikandar 123 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.7,902 Muhammad Sadiq S/o Khair 58 133 124 7-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 11,664 Din Shoukat Ali S/o Abdul 59 142 Sattar, Sardar Muhammad, 135 8-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.4,932 Iqbal S/o M. Sharif Sardar Muhammad So Bagh 60 147 140 3-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.2,114 Ali Mehar Din S/o Noor 61 148 141 9-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 18,714 Muhammad Muhammad Rafiq S/o 62 149 142 12-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 12,728 Barket Ali 63 154 Shahab Din S/o Nizam Din 147 6-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.7,516 (4) Chak No. 9/W.B Rs. - Abdul Aziz S/o Khalil 1 8 8 17-Marlas, 9-Sarsi Rs. 17,941 Rehmani Shah Muhammad S/o Imam 2 39 39 8-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 13,694 Ali Abdul Majeed , Abdul 3 47 45 11-Marlas Rs.9,238 Hameed S/o Fazal Khan Rafiq Ahmad S/o Noor 4 48 46 10-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 22,189 Muhammad 5 53 Abdul Aziz S/o Wajad Ali 51 4-Marlas Rs.2,306 Qamar Din S/o Khushi 6 82 84 8-Marlas Rs. 13,307 Muhammad Abdul Majeed S/o Abdul 7 107 Ghafoor, Arshad Ali , M. Feb-97 9-Marlas Rs.5,187 Iqbal S/o Abdul Majeed Muhammad Ayyub S/o 8 116 103 4-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.2,563 Naik Muhammad Dewan Khan S/o Niaz 9 117 104 19-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 52,305 Muhammad Zulfiqar S/o M. Sharif, 10 121 Khushi Khan S/o Sharif, 107 18-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 21,002 Farman Khan S/o Khushi 61

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Muhammad

Nasar Ahmad S/o Farzand 11 131 116 12-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 28,752 Ali Bagh Ali Khan S/o Ghulam 12 138 122 13-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 31,841 Hussain Baqar Ali S/o Ghulam 13 150 133 7-Sarsi Rs. 450 Hussain Paley Khan S/o Gammon, 14 152 134 9-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.5,700 M. Aslam S/o Paley Khan Muhammad Younis S/o 15 172 155 7-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 10,991 Abbas Ali Sakhawat Ali Khan S/o 16 175 157 11-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 24,119 Niaz Muhammad 17 197 Shahab Din S/o Sonay Khan 177 5-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.5,199 Muhammad Address S/o 18 216 196 10-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 21,416 Shah Muhammad Muhammad Baqar Ali Khan 19 243 S/o Gammon, Zafar Ali S/o 225 8-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.5,064 Baqar Ali Khushi Muhammad S/o Kamdar Khan, Liaqat, 20 250 233 13-Marlas Rs.7,492 Shoukat S/o Qabool Khan S/o Kamdar Khan Mahfooz Khan S/o Shoukat, 21 291 275 3-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,795 M. Sharif S/o Mansab Ali Syed Nazar Abbas S/o 22 303 281 6-Marlas Rs.6,357 Mehmood ul Hassan Amanual Massih, Samuel 23 310 288 2-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.1,666 S/o Karnal Massih 24 311 Amanual S/o James 1/288 1-Marla Rs. 577 25 312 Kartari Widow Rada Massih 289 2-Marlas Rs.1,153 26 316 Samuel S/o Ch. Rehmat 1/294 2-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.1,538 Noor Muhammad S/o Fateh 27 318 296 3-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.1,986 Muhammad Dost Muhammad S/o Nizam 28 320 Din, Akhtar Tasawar S/o 299 9-Marlas Rs.6,048 Dost Muhammad 62

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Ikram ul Din S/o Islam-u- 29 364 341 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.5,952 Din Imtiaz So M. Yousaf, 30 382 361 1-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.1,090 Ashraf S/o Mumtaz Muhammad Iqbal S/o 31 497 480 4-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.2,627 Ghulam Muhammad Bag Bibi Widow Noor Din, 32 537 516 7-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.4,450 M. Akhtar S/o Noor Din Liaqat Ali S/o Ghulam 33 547 527 7-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 15,775 Qadir Mehar Din S/o Sher 34 549 Muhammad, Abdul Jabbar 529 6-Marlas Rs.3,458 S/o Ghulam Nabi Riaz, Abrar Hussain S/o 35 577 553 11-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 12,517 Muhammad Akbar Gulfam, M. Akram, M. 36 636 Islam, M. Irfan, M. Kamran 530 10-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.6,071 etc. Muhammad Yaqoob S/o 37 640 531 10-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 22,961 Ghulam Muhammad Gulzar Ahmad S/o Noor 38 659 659 12-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 28,752 Din Bashir Hussain S/o Hassan 39 662 554 6-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.7,516 Ali 40 685 Fateh Muhammad S/o Qadir 685 3-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.2,242 41 705 Noor Din S/o Rehman 705 4-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.2,371 42 706 M. Aslam S/o M. Ali 4-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.2,435 M. Saddique S/o Kareem 43 727 Bukhsh, M. Rafiq, M. 621 11-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 39,716 Shafeeq S/o M. Saddique Abdul Rehman, Abdul 44 728 603 17-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 46,014 Ghani S/o Sher Muhammad 45 729 Naseer Ahmad S/o Siraj Din 602 15-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 61,816 Muhammad Latif S/o 46 730 601 8-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 23,755 Kareem Bukhsh Sona S/o Bola, Sharif 47 743 Nawaz, Allah Ditta S/o 743 17-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 72,252 Sona Ghulam Rasool S/o Bola, 48 607 607 14-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 30,880 Umar Din 63

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Fazal Hassan S/o Mola 49 614 614 3-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,923 Bukhsh Muhammad Hussain S/o 50 74 74 2-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.9,388 Abdul Wahid Muhammad Ishaq S/o Jaan 51 96 96 1-Marlas Rs.8,088 Muhammad Liaqat Ali S/o Ghulam 52 2 Muhammad, Muhammad 2 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.3,067 Yar S/o Alawal Khan Muhammad Naseem Ahmad 53 9 9 5-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.5,883 Khan Muhammad Yaqoob So 54 10 10 5-Marlas Rs.1,882 Shahab Khan (5) ANWAR ABAD Rs. - Manzoor Ahmad S/o Shah 1 6 01-May 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.8,642 Muhammad Bashir Ahmad S/o Ali 2 8 7 7-Marlas Rs. 10,860 Gohar Khan Muhammad S/o 3 30 28 4-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.2,819 Muhammad Ali Abdul Rehman S/o 4 33 29 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Muhammad Ali (6) BHATTA SHAHDI KHAN Rs. - Riaz Ahmad, Akhtar 1 2 Hussain S/o Ghulam 2 6-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.3,780 Muhammad Nadeem, Iqbal, Javed Iqbal 2 12 01-Nov 10-Marlas Rs.5,763 S/o Rasool Bukhsh Ali Muhammad S/o M. 3 28 Sultan, Muhammad Nawaz 26 6-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.5,187 So Ali Muhammad Anayat Ali S/o Muhammad 4 31 29 9-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 21,882 Sultan 5 45 Sughran D/o M. Abdullah 43 6-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.7,883 Muhammad Shafi S/o 6 47 45 7-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 12,882 Abdullah Shoukat Ali, Liaqat Ali S/o 7 50 48 8-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 24,883 Elam Din Bashir Ahmad S/o Abdul 8 67 64 5-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.6,384 Ghani 64

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Ahmad Bukhsh S/o Imam 9 81 75 7-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 13,383 Bukhsh Shoukat Javed, Fazal 10 85 3 1-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.1,026 Muhammad Abdul Hameed S/o Qadir 11 86 4 4-Marlas Rs.2,306 Bukhsh Munwar Ahmad S/o Aziz Rehman, Riaz Ahmad, 12 96 14 12-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.7,110 Zahid Ahmad S/o M. Saddique Abdul Hameed S/o Rehmat 13 99 17 3-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,781 Khan Abdul Ghafoor S/o Ghulam 14 111 29 5-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.3,882 Muhammad Abdul Shakoor S/o Ghulam 15 111 Jan-29 5-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.4,383 Muhammad Shah Muhammad S/o Sher 16 112 30 16-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 56,383 Muhammad Ghulam Muhammad S/o 17 116 34 3-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,795 Ibrahim Nazir Ahmad S/o Abdul 18 120 38 1-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 770 Aziz M. Rafiq, M. Hanif S/o 19 128 Ahmad Buksh, Ahmad 45 13-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.7,775 Bukhsh S/o Rana Mukhtar Ahmad S/o 20 129 46 5-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.6,772 Ghulam Muhammad Ghulam Sarwar , 21 133 Muhammad Shafi S/o 50 11-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 11,170 Ahmad Bukhsh Muhammad Anwar S/o 22 134 51 13-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 32,999 Ahmad Bukhsh Muhammad Saleem, Yaseen 23 136 53 6-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.3,780 S/o Muhammad Latif 24 138 Muhammad Yar S/o Sultan 55 10-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 26,816 Muhammad Latif S/o 25 139 56 8-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs. 19,484 Ibrahim Khan Khushi Muhammad S/o 26 142 59 5-Marlas Rs. 10,383 Muhammad Yousaf Muhammad Habib S/o 27 146 Feb-60 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.9,382 Sikandar 65

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Khushi Muhammad S/o 28 150 62 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 14,883 Sher Muhammad Habib S/o Feroz Din, Abdul 29 154 66 1-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.1,090 Sattar S/o Barket Ali Muhammad Sharif S/o 30 173 81 6-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.8,883 Khushi Muhammad Wali Muhammad S/o Noor 31 182 90 13-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 33,683 Muhammad 32 185 Allah Ditta S/o Nathu 93 14-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 44,382 Sardar Muhammad S/o Din 33 188 96 10-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 27,382 Muhammad Abdul Haq S/o Shah 34 190 98 11-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 31,682 Muhammad Muhammad Aslam S/o 35 191 99 12-Marlas Rs. 34,384 Faqeer Muhammad 36 193 Nooro Bibi Widow Sardar 101 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.9,382 37 194 Ghulam Fareed S/o Basra 102 6-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.8,382 Ghulam Rasool S/o Shah 38 203 111 10-Marlas Rs. 25,382 Muhammad 39 204 Iqbal So Shah Muhammad 1/111 10-Marlas Rs. 25,382 Muhammad Hanif S/o Shah 40 205 2/111 10-Marlas Rs. 25,382 Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor S/o Allah 41 207 113 9-Marlas Rs. 20,882 Yar Allah Yar S/o Ghulam 42 208 114 12-Marlas Rs. 34,382 Muhammad 43 209 Falak Sher S/o Mehmood 115 16-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 54,883 Rasheed Ahmad S/o Jaan 44 219 124 22-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 79,382 Muhammad 45 224 Rasheed Ahmad S/o Wali 128 7-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 12,638 Muhammad 46 236 Ali Asad Ullah, Ali Ahmad 1/138 18-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 88,264 S/o Badar Din 47 237 Noor Muhammad S/o 139 16-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs. 53,382 Nazim Din 48 249 Faqeer Muhammad S/o Ali 150 9-Marlas Rs. 20,882 Akbar

66

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. 49 262 Maqbool Ahmad S/o Noor 160 21-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 38,646 Ahmad, M. Saleem S/o Maqbool Ahmad, Iqbal Hassan S/o Khadim Hussain 50 263 Bashir Ahmad S/o Ibrahim, 161 29-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.114,883 Ejaz Akhtar, Shahid Ibrahim 51 264 Muhammad Boota S/o 162 6-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.9,382 Rehmat Ali 52 282 Muhammad Naseem S/o 180 5-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.3,882 Ghulam Rasool 53 283 Rehmat Bibi W/o Shamda, 181 10-Marlas Rs.6,720 Sultan S/o Allah Bukhsh 54 284 Warham S/o Allah Bukhsh, 206- 14-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 25,715 Allah Ditta S/o Warham 182 55 303 Ghulam Sarwar S/o Shah 199 11-Marlas Rs. 10,263 Muhammad, Arshad Ali S/o Ghulam Sarwar 56 306 Umar Hayat S/o Noor 202 13-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 40,882 Muhammad 57 307 Abdul Jabbar S/o 203 3-Marlas Rs.1,729 Muhammad Abdullah 58 324 Abdul Hameed S/o Abdul 221 5-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.6,882 Ghani 59 325 Ghulam Muhammad S/o 222 5-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.3,882 Allah Ditta 60 326 Sakhi Hussain Shah S/o Lal 223 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.5,383 Shah 61 328 Zubida Begum W/o M. 225 10-Marlas Rs.5,763 Bashir, Tanveer Ahmad S/o Khushi Muhammad 62 329 Aift Naseem W/o Naseer 226 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Ahmad 63 330 Habib Ahmad S/o 227 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,755 Muhammad Bukhsh, M. Hassan S/o Lal Shah 64 331 Abdullah S/o Abdul 228 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Ghafoor 65 332 Riaz S/o Ameer, Basi 229 9-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.5,381 Widow Ameer, Arshad Bibi W/o Muhammad Ali 66 333 Ifftiqhar Ali S/o Ali 230 5-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.3,882 67

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Muhammad 67 334 Kaneez Akhtar W/o Zafar 231 5-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.6,364 Iqbal 68 336 Sahadat Ali S/o Mubarak 233 5-Marlas, Rs.2,882 Ali 69 337 Zulfiqar Ali S/o Gulzar 234 5-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.4,876 Ahmad 70 338 Rehmat Ali S/o Kako 235 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,755 71 339 Muhammad Ramzan S/o 236 4-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.2,818 Musa 72 341 Roshan Ali S/o Ghulam 238 5-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.6,882 Muhammad 73 342 Naseer Ahmad S/o Abdul 239 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Rehman 74 343 Abdul Shakoor S/o Ghulam 240 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Muhammad 75 344 Muhammad Shahid S/o 241 6-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 11,383 Zulfiqar Ali 76 345 Muhammad Manzoor S/o 242 6-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.8,382 Muhammad Aslam 77 346 Muhammad Bilal S/o 243 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Zulfiqar Ali 78 347 Gulzar Ahmad S/o 244 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Muhammad Aslam 79 348 Muhammad Ikram ul Haq 245 10-Marlas Rs.5,763 So Asmat Ullah, Abdul Wahid S/o Shaf u Din 80 349 Atta Rehman S/o 246 10-Marlas Rs.5,763 Muhammad Ramzan, Abdul Razaq So Abdul Haq 91 350 Majeed Akhtar S/o Jaan 247 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Muhammad 92 351 Muhammad Saleem S/o 248 5-Marlas Rs.2,882 Sardar Muhammad 93 352 Muhammad Shafi S/o Allah 249 5-Marlas Rs.4,882 Bukhsh (7) CHAK NO. 11/W.B SHARQI Rs. - 1 18 Fiaz Muhammad S/o 14 5-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.4,427 Muhammad Shafeeq 2 24 Rehmat Bibi W/o 234 5-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.3,294 68

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Muhammad Rafiq 3 30 Kalu S/o Nabi Bukhsh 226 10-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 23,347 4 63 Muhammad Akram S/o 207 6-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.6,744 Muhammad Bukhsh Sahil 5 98 Muhammad Yousaf S/o 64 1-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 962 Bashir Ahmad 6 99 Allah Ditta S/o Bagh Ali 63 8-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 15,239 7 159 Rehmat Ali S/o Gola, Ashiq 99 6-Marlas, 2-Sarsi Rs.7,163 Ali S/o Rehmat Ali 8 162 Muhammad Boota S/o 102 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,755 Mahmoob Ali 9 199 Fiaz Muhammad S/o Imam 139 18-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 36,442 Din, Sadiq Ali S/o Fiaz Muhammad 10 202 Khadim Hussain S/o Nawab 142 6-Marlas Rs.6,357 11 204 Abdul Ghani S/o Khair Din, 144 11-Marlas Rs.6,405 Muhammad Anwar, M. Sarwar, M. Akhtar S/o Abdul Ghani 12 214 Wazeeran Bibi M/o 155 2-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.1,474 Muhammad Hanif, M. Hanif S/o Jamal Din 13 215 Muhammad Hussain S/o 154 2-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,347 Jamal 14 220 Ashiq Hussain S/o Shah 160 8-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 15,624 Muhammad 15 246 Aslam Din S/o Toha Khan 184 7-Marlas Rs.9,832 16 272 Zulfiqar Ali S/o Kareem 240 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.4,814 Bukhsh 17 312 Ghulam Rasool, M. Aslam, 545 8-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 14,852 Ghulam Haider etc.

18 334 Mushtaq Ahmad S/o Fazal 524 3-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,795 Din 19 342 Nazir Ahmad S/o Fateh 1/512 4-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.2,371 Muhammad 20 348 Allah Yar S/o Sardar Khan, 3/515 4-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.2,371 etc. 21 354 Muhammad Ramzan S/o 2/525 7-Marlas Rs.9,832 69

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. Miran Bukhsh 22 358 Muhammad Ramzan S/o 528 15-Marlas Rs. 37,632 Amla 23 359 Ghulam Hussain S/o Umroo 532 3-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.2,051 24 418 Sareena S/o Qamra Massih 600 8-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 14,466 25 426 Ashiq S/o Anayat, Anayat 607 9-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs. 17,169 S/o Nika 26 430 Das S/o Faqeer Masih 1/655 2-Marlas, 1-Sarsi Rs.1,219 27 432 Anayat Masih S/o Bashir 656 2-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,347 Masih 28 433 Samuel S/o Fazal Masih 657 2-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.1,474 29 435 Ghulam S/o Umra Masih 1/654 6-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.9,447 30 446 Abdul Sattar S/o Fateh 2/665 3-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.1,347 Muhammad 31 469 Jaga S/o Ameren Masih 653 3-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,923 32 471 Muhammad Rafiq S/o Jamal 673 3-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.2,179 Din 33 472 Muhammad Dilbar, 679 15-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 11,735 Multani, Mansab Ali S/o Jamal Din 34 484 Raza S/o Murid Ali 690 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs. 12,149 35 501 Islam Din So Dolat Ali 700 6-Marlas Rs. 674 36 510 Zulfiqar S/o Mian Saloo, 618 14-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.8,454 Saddique, Kali Khan S/o Haq Nawaz, Haq Nawaz S/o Mian Saloo 37 517 Muhammad Hussain S/o 633 4-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.2,819 Hayat Muhammad 38 518 Muhammad Ashraf S/o 634 5-Marlas, 6-Sarsi Rs.5,199 Muhammad Sardar 39 542 Muhammad Qasim S/o 487 7-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 10,991 Raheem Bukhsh 40 543 Ghulam Rasool S/o Din 485 15-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 24,684 Muhammad, Ahmad Din S/o Bagh Ali 41 544 Hanif S/o Khair Din 484 6-Marlas Rs.6,357 42 552 Fiaz S/o Yar Muhammad 491 6-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.7,516

70

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. 43 570 Muhammad Jaffar S/o 448 2-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.1,410 Ghulam Muhammad 44 572 Nazir Begum D/o Feroz Din 451 1-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 634 45 575 Muhammad Afzal S/o Lal 454 4-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.2,563 Khan 46 579 Zafar S/o Bana, Kala S/o 465 8-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.4,804 Zafar 47 580 Munir Ahmad Daha S/o 466 10-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs. 37,023 Ghulam Qadir Khan 48 583 Farzand S/o Chadar 450 11-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs. 24,891 49 585 Elam Din S/o Muhammad 455 7-Marlas Rs.4,004 Ramzan 50 586 Talib Hussain S/o Fazal Din 457 2-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.1,602 51 588 Hussain Din S/o Mango 463 2-Marlas, 7-Sarsi Rs.1,602 52 589 Imdad Hussain So Abdul 464 4-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.3,060 Hameed 53 622 Muhammad Ramzan S/o 777 7-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 11,172 Bagh Ali 54 624 Nizam Din S/o Siraj Din 780 4-Marlas, 3-1/2- Rs.2,594 Sarsi 55 675 Siraj Din S/o Bagh Din 773 10-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs. 22,189 56 683 Hanifan Bibi W/o Allah 762 5-Marlas Rs.2,860 Dad 57 734 Muhammad Amin S/o 1256 1-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs. 834 Muhammad Bukhsh 58 786 Maqbool Begum Widow 1184/1 5-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.4,814 Maqsood Ahmad 59 798 Sher Muhammad S/o Peer 1174 3-Marlas, 5-Sarsi Rs.2,051 Bukhsh 60 799 Mst. Bashiran Widow 1173 2-Marlas, 3-Sarsi Rs.1,523 Abdul Hameed 61 808 Arshad Ali S/o Ghulam 1154 2-Marlas Rs.1,153 Muhammad 62 809 Imdad Hussain S/o Ghulam 1212 4-Marlas Rs.2,306 Muhammad 63 818 Muhammad Ismail S/o Jalal 1202 3-Marlas Rs.1,729 Din, M. Rafiq S/o M. Ismail 64 835 Ghulam Muhammad S/o 1213 3-Marlas, 4-Sarsi Rs.2,316 Muhammad Jameel Bukhsh, 71

No.

Area

Sr. No. Amount

Allottee

Name of

Survey No. Register Sr. M. Javed So Ghulam Muhammad 65 836 Najeeb Ahmad S/o Nawab 1215 4-Marlas, 8-Sarsi Rs.3,285 Din 66 708 Fazal Kareem S/o Anayat 1486 5-Marlas, 1-Sarsi 3269 Khadim Hussain S/o Akhtar 67 713 1656 6-Marlas 6357 Shah 68 Ghulam Hussain S/o 714 1657 6-Marlas 6357 Muhammad Amir Syed Sifat Hussain Shah S/o 69 726 1048 7-Marlas, 6-Sarsi 11960 Manzoor Hussain Shah 70 Zafar Abbas S/o Manzoor 728 1050 2-Marlas, 4-Sarsi 978 Hussain Abdul Sattar S/o 71 800 1364 7-Marlas 9661 Muhammad Boota 72 Muhammad Shafi S/o Allah 805 1369 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi 2755 Ditta Fiaz Hussain, Altaf Hussain 73 838 1/1400 8-Marlas, 1-Sarsi 4676 S/o Sikandar Khan 74 880 Noor Ahmad S/o Gama 1455 7-Marlas 9832 75 881 Noor Ahmad S/o Nazra 1456 4-Marlas, 5-Sarsi 2627 76 Muhammad Aqil S/o Zafar 1030 929/3 4-Marlas, 7-Sarsi 2755 Ali Ghulam Murtaza, Mustafa 77 1092 S/o Muhammad Nawaz 871/1 8-Marlas 4611 Shah 78 Abdul Aziz, Muhammad 1129 Yaqoob S/o Muhammad 1313/1 10-Marlas, 7-Sarsi 8360 Saddique Muhammad Rafiq S/o Wali 79 1131 Muhammad, Bagh Ali S/o 1313/3 26-Marlas 14983 Fateh Muhammad, etc. 80 Muhammad Ramzan S/o 1132 1313/4 12-Marlas, 7-Sarsi 7365 Muhammad Saddique, etc. Total 3,868,819

72

Annexure-I

[Para No.1.3.2.2]

Non-recovery of Rent of Shops - Rs 8.965 million (Amount in Rupees) Total Annual Name of market Recovery Arrears shop Demand Year 2010-11 Goal Chowk 42 1,034,635 958,952 75,683 Arif Bazar 142 1,651,776 1,544,427 107,349 Food Green Road & Joyia Road 89 428,784 374,598 54,186 Burewala General Bas Stand 11 328,585 152,901 175,684 Tharajat Lakkar Mandi 18 17,290 13,557 3,733 Vehari Bazar 142 1,443,780 1,352,932 90,848 Total 444 4,904,850 4,397,367 507,483 Year 2011-12 Goal Chowk 42 1,041,199 1,041,199 - Arif Bazar 142 1,934,728 1,797,183 137,545 Food Green Road & Joyia Road 89 471,528 405,112 66,416 Burewala General Bas Stand 11 205,968 12,687 193,101 Tharajat Lakkar Mandi 18 19,018 16,350 2,668 Vehari Bazar 142 1,610,040 1,507,339 102,701 Total 444 5,282,481 4,780,050 502,431 Grand Total (2010-11 & 2011-12) 444 10,187,331 9,177,417 1,009,914 Arrears (2009-10) 7,955,023 Total Arrears 8,964,937

73