Irregular Repair of Vehicle for Rs

Irregular Repair of Vehicle for Rs

AUDIT REPORT ON THE ACCOUNTS OF TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONS DISTRICT VEHARI AUDIT YEAR 2012-2013 AUDITOR GENERAL OF PAKISTAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................. i PREFACE .............................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................. iii SUMMARY TABLES AND CHARTS .............................................................. vi Table 1: Audit Work Statistics ............................................................................... vi Table 2: Audit Observations .................................................................................. vi Table 3: Outcome Statistics ................................................................................... vii Table 4: Irregularities Pointed Out ........................................................................ vii CHAPTER-1 .......................................................................................................... 1 1. TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONS, VEHARI ....................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Comments on Budget and Accounts (Variance Analysis)......................... 2 1.1.2 Brief Comments on Status of Compliance with PAC/ZAC Directives ..... 3 1.2 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Vehari ............................................. 4 1.2.1 Non-Production of Record ......................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Performance ............................................................................................... 6 1.3 Tehsil Municipal Administration, Burewala ....................................... 10 1.3.1 Irregularities & Non-Compliance ............................................................ 11 1.3.2 Performance ............................................................................................. 14 Annexures ............................................................................................................ 22 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADP Annual Development Programme CCB Citizen Community Board DAC Departmental Accounts Committee FD Finance Department IPSAS International Public Sector Accounting Standards LG&CD Local Government & Community Development MFDAC Memorandum for Department Accounts Committee NAM New Accounting Model PAC Public Accounts Committee PDG Punjab District Government PLGO Punjab Local Government Ordinance PDSSP Punjab Devolved Social Sector Programme TAC Town Accounts Committee TMA Town Municipal Administration TMO Town Municipal Officer TO (F) Town Officer (Finance) TO (I&S) Town Officer (Infrastructure & Services) TO (P&C) Town Officer (Planning & Coordination) TO (R) Town Officer (Regulations) i Preface Articles 169 and 170 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and Section 115 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001 require the Auditor General of Pakistan to conduct the audit of the receipts and expenditure of the Local Fund and Public Accounts of Tehsil / Town Municipal Administrations of the Districts. The Report is based on audit of Tehsil Municipal Administration of District Vehari for the years 2010-12. The Directorate General of Audit District Governments Punjab (South), Multan, conducted audit during 2012-13 on test check basis with a view to reporting significant findings to relevant stakeholders. The main body of Audit Report includes only the systemic issues and audit findings carrying value of Rs.1 million or more. Relatively less significant issues are listed in the Annexure-I of the Audit Report. The Audit observations listed in the Annexure-I shall be pursued with the Principal Accounting Officer at the DAC level and in all cases where the PAO does not initiate appropriate action, the Audit observations will be brought to the notice of the Public Accounts Committee through the next year’s Audit Report. Audit findings indicate need for adherence to the regularity framework besides instituting and strengthening internal controls to avoid recurrence of similar violations and irregularities. Most of the observations included in this Report have been finalized in the light of written responses and discussion with the management. The Audit Report is submitted to the Governor of the Punjab in pursuance of Article 171 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, read with Section 115 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, for causing it to be laid before the Provincial PAC. Islamabad (Muhammad Akhtar Buland Rana) Dated: Auditor General of Pakistan ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Directorate General Audit, District Governments, Punjab (South), Multan, a Field Audit Office of the Auditor General of Pakistan is responsible to carry out the audit of all District Governments in Punjab (South) including Tehsil and Town Municipal Administrations. Its Regional Directorate of Audit Multan has audit jurisdiction of District Governments, TMAs and UAs of six Districts i.e. Multan, Lodhran, Vehari, Sahiwal, Pakpattan and Khanewal. The Regional Directorate has a human resource of 32 including 25 officers, constituting 7,575 man days and a budget allocation of about Rs 11.029 million for financial year 2011-12. It has the mandate to conduct financial attest audit, audit of sanctions, audit of compliance with authority and audit of receipts as well as the Performance Audit of entities, projects and programs. Accordingly, R.D.A Multan carried out audit of the accounts of two TMAs of District Vehari for the financial years 2010-2012 and the findings are included in this Audit Report. Each Tehsil Municipal Administration in District Vehari is headed by a Tehsil Nazim / Administrator. He/she carries out operations as per Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001. Tehsil Municipal Officer is the Principal Accounting Officer (PAO) and acts as coordinating and administrative officer, responsible to control land use, its division and development and to enforce all laws including Municipal Laws, Rules and by-laws. The PLGO, 2001, requires the establishment of Tehsil / Town Local Fund and Public Account for which Annual Budget Statement is authorized by the Tehsil Nazim / Tehsil Council / Administrator in the form of Budgetary Grants. The total Development Budget of two above mentioned TMAs in District Vehari for the financial years 2010-2012, was Rs 500.301 million and expenditure incurred was of Rs 209.470 million, showing savings of Rs 290.831million in these years. The total Non Development Budget for financial year 2011-2012 was Rs 598.489 million and expenditure was of Rs 465.740 million, showing savings of Rs 132.749 million. The reasons for savings in Development and Non development Budgets are required to be provided by TMO and PAO concerned. Audit of TMAs of District Vehari was carried out with the view to ascertain that the expenditure was incurred with proper authorization, in iii conformity with laws/rules/regulations, economical procurement of assets and hiring of services etc. Audit of receipts/ revenues was also conducted to verify whether the assessment, collection, reconciliation and allocation of revenues were made in accordance with laws and rules and that there was no leakage of revenue. a. Audit Methodology Audit was conducted after understanding the business processes of TMAs with respect to functions, control structure, prioritization of risk areas by determining their significance and identification of key controls. This helped auditors in understanding the systems, procedures, environment, and the audited entity before starting field audit activity. Audit used desk audit techniques for analysis of compiled data and review of permanent files/record. Desk Audit greatly facilitated identification of high-risk areas for substantive testing in the field. b. Audit of Expenditure and Receipts Audit of development expenditure of Rs 62.841 million was carried out, out of the total expenditure of Rs 209.470 million and Audit of non development expenditure Rs 105.961million out of the total expenditure of Rs 465.740 million for the financial year 2010-2012 was conducted, which are 30% & 23% of development and non development expenditures, respectively. Total overall expenditure of TMAs of District Vehari for the financial year 2010-2012 was Rs 168.802 million, out of which overall expenditure of Rs 675.210 million was audited, which is 25% of total expenditure. Therefore, there was 100% achievement against the planned audit activities. c. Recoveries at the Instance of Audit Recoveries of Rs 115.181 million were pointed out through various audit paras but no recovery was effected till the compilation of this Report. Out of the total recoveries Rs17.854 was not in the notice of the Executive before audit. d. The Key Audit Findings of the Report i. Non production of record of Rs 62.516 million noted in one case.1 ii. Non compliance of Rules and Regulations amounting to Rs 3.919 million noted in two cases.2 1 Para: 1.2.1.1 2 Para: 1.3.1.1,1.3.1.2 iv iii. Performance issues involving an amount of Rs 119.607 million were noted in twelve cases 3. iv. Audit Paras on the accounts for 2010-12 involving procedural violations including internal control weaknesses and irregularities which were not considered worth reporting to Provincial PAC, therefore have been included in Memorandum for Departmental

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    82 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us