DOCSLIB.ORG

DNA Copyright

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DNA Copyright Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 46 Number 1 Fall 2011 pp.1-41 Fall 2011 DNA Copyright Andrew W. Torrance Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew W. Torrance, DNA Copyright, 46 Val. U. L. Rev. 1 (2011). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol46/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Torrance: DNA Copyright Articles DNA COPYRIGHT Andrew W. Torrance* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 2 II. EVOLVING CONCEPTS OF DNA .......................................................... 6 A. Factor ............................................................................................................ 8 B. Particle .......................................................................................................... 8 C. Molecule ........................................................................................................ 9 D. Sequence...................................................................................................... 10 E. Information ................................................................................................. 12 F. Program ...................................................................................................... 13 III. PATENT PROTECTION FOR DNA ...................................................... 14 A. Origin ......................................................................................................... 14 B. Effect ........................................................................................................... 15 C. Criticism ..................................................................................................... 17 D. Response ..................................................................................................... 18 IV. SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY .......................................................................... 22 A. Recombining ............................................................................................... 23 B. Programming .............................................................................................. 23 C. Engineering ................................................................................................ 24 V. COPYRIGHT PROTECTION FOR DNA .............................................. 26 A. History ........................................................................................................ 27 B. Requirements .............................................................................................. 28 C. Subject Matter ............................................................................................ 30 D. Software ...................................................................................................... 31 E. Functionality .............................................................................................. 34 F. Duration ..................................................................................................... 37 G. Independent Creation.................................................................................. 37 H. Fair Use ...................................................................................................... 37 I. Open Source Biology .................................................................................. 39 VI. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 40 1 Produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2011 Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 46, No. 1 [2011], Art. 1 2 VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 46 1 I. INTRODUCTION Each year since 1980, on a Friday in January, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) has hosted the MIT Mystery Hunt.2 To win this competition, a team must solve a number of challenging puzzles whose solutions reveal where on the MIT campus to find a special coin. The first team to locate the coin wins the Mystery Hunt and is awarded the privilege of designing the next Mystery Hunt. In 2005, the clues of one of the puzzles, entitled “Shotgun Wedding,” involved 11 nucleotide sequence fragments, each approximately 1,000 nucleotides in length.3 To solve this puzzle, it was necessary to understand that the fragments resulted from “shotgun sequencing,” a © 2011 Andrew W. Torrance * Andrew W. Torrance is a Professor in the School of Law, a Research Associate at the Biodiversity Institute, and a Docking Faculty Scholar at the University of Kansas. He received a Ph.D. in biology from Harvard University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. The author would like to thank his research assistants, Dr. James McParland and Dr. Sparkle Ellison, for their invaluable assistance with research for this article. 1 The author first presented his ideas about DNA copyright in November 2008 in a speech entitled “Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology,” at Biolaw 2.0: Law at the Frontiers of Biology, at the University of Kansas School of Law. Subsequently, the author presented his proposals regarding DNA copyright in March 2009 in “Synthetic Biology—Law and the Next Open Source Hardware,” at the MIT Innovation Lab, MIT Sloan School of Management; in May 2009 in “Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology,” at the OECD Collaborative Mechanisms for Intellectual Property Management Workshop, OECD Headquarters, Paris, France; in June 2009 in “Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology,” at the Biotech Summer Institute at Drake University and Pioneer Hi-Bred, Des Moines, Iowa; in November 2009 in “The Legal Possibilities of Synthetic Biology,” at the MIT Innovation Lab, MIT Sloan School of Management; in September 2010 in “Open Biological Innovation—From Patents to Commons to Copyright to Open Source,” at the Berkeley Open Innovation Forum, Berkeley Law Schools, Berkeley, California; in January 2011 in “Synthetic Biology Meets the Law,” at the American Association of Law Schools Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California; and in March 2011 in “Open Biological Innovation: From Patents to Commons to Copyright to Open Source,” at the Valparaiso University Law Review Symposium on Bioethics, Law, and Synthetic Biology, Valparaiso University School of Law, Valparaiso, Indiana. The author has previously published articles about gene patents Andrew W. Torrance, Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents, 11 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 157, 157–91 (2010) [hereinafter, Torrance, Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents], and Andrew W. Torrance, Patent Rights and Civil Wrongs: The ACLU Lawsuit, 8 BIO-IT WORLD 11 (2009); synthetic biology, Andrew W. Torrance, Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology, 11 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 157, 642–48 (2010) [hereinafter, Torrance, Synthesizing Law for Synthetic Biology]; and genomics, Andrew W. Torrance, Family Law and the Genomic Revolution, 79 U. MO. KAN. CITY L. REV. 271 (2011) that draw on some common research sources. 2 MIT Mystery Hunt, MIT.EDU, http://web.mit.edu/puzzle/www/index.html (last visited June 27, 2011). Thank you to James Grimmelmann for bringing this to my attention on the IPProfs listserv (October 14, 2010). 3 Jed Goldstone, Shotgun Wedding, MIT.EDU, http://web.mit.edu/puzzle/www/05/ setec/shotgun_wedding (last visited June 27, 2011). https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol46/iss1/1 Torrance: DNA Copyright 2011] DNA Copyright 3 method of determining the sequential nucleotides in a stretch of deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”). The fragments had to be aligned “contiguously,” and the ends of “contig[s]” translated into their corresponding amino acids. Done properly, this resulted in the following instruction: “SEEKGENEFRAMES.” Finally, the longest “open reading frame[ ],” when translated into its corresponding amino sequence, yielded the message “MYANSWERISSEPARATECHECKSANDTHERESTISFILLER.”4 Armed with this clue, teams could progress to the next stage in the Mystery Hunt. An intriguing feature of the Shotgun Wedding puzzle is that the DNA sequences it employed were designed by Jed Goldstone not to be precursors for the synthesis of a polypeptide that might be useful in treating disease, conferring a useful trait on a crop plant, or carrying out an industrial process. Rather, Goldstone simply used the genetic code of nucleotides adenine (“A”), guanine (“G”), thymine (“T”), and cytosine (“C”), and the amino acids (for example, methionine (“M”), tyrosine (“Y”), and alanine (“Ala”)) encoded by triplet codons of these nucleotides to create a short intelligible message. Goldstone was an author, his medium was DNA, and his products were original and expressive literary works. Although Goldstone employed A, G, T, and C as symbols to represent nucleotides, he might instead have chosen to compose his work using actual nucleotides decipherable through routine chemical sequencing techniques. Either way, the original work of authorship that Goldstone created in a tangible medium of expression using sequences of nucleotides and amino acids is eligible for copyright protection. In fact, even DNA sequences that code for functional polypeptides or RNAs may qualify for copyright protection to the extent that function does not dictate structure, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Barbara Mcclintock's World
    Barbara McClintock’s World Timeline adapted from Dolan DNA Learning Center exhibition 1902-1908 Barbara McClintock is born in Hartford, Connecticut, the third of four children of Sarah and Thomas Henry McClintock, a physician. She spends periods of her childhood in Massachusetts with her paternal aunt and uncle. Barbara at about age five. This prim and proper picture betrays the fact that she was, in fact, a self-reliant tomboy. Barbara’s individualism and self-sufficiency was apparent even in infancy. When Barbara was four months old, her parents changed her birth name, Eleanor, which they considered too delicate and feminine for such a rugged child. In grade school, Barbara persuaded her mother to have matching bloomers (shorts) made for her dresses – so she could more easily join her brother Tom in tree climbing, baseball, volleyball, My father tells me that at the and football. age of five I asked for a set of tools. He My mother used to did not get me the tools that you get for an adult; he put a pillow on the floor and give got me tools that would fit in my hands, and I didn’t me one toy and just leave me there. think they were adequate. Though I didn’t want to tell She said I didn’t cry, didn’t call for him that, they were not the tools I wanted. I wanted anything. real tools not tools for children. 1908-1918 McClintock’s family moves to Brooklyn in 1908, where she attends elementary and secondary school. In 1918, she graduates one semester early from Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Hox Genes 2
    School ofMedicine Oregon Health Sciences University CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This is certify that the Ph.D. thesis of WendyKnosp has been approved Mentor/ Advisor ~ Member Member QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF HOXA13 FUNCTION IN THE DEVELOPING LIMB By Wendy M. lt<nosp A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics and the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS X ABSTRACT xii CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 I. Hox genes 2 A. Discovery of Hox genes in Drosophila melanogaster 2 B. Hox cluster colinearity and conservation 7 C. Human Hox mutations 9 D. Hoxa13: HFGS and Guttmacher syndromes 10 II. The Homeodomain 12 A. Homeodomain structure 12 B. DNA binding 14 Ill. Limb development 16 A. Patterning of the limb axes 16 B. Digit formation 20 C. lnterdigital programmed cell death 21 IV. BMPs and limb development 23 A. BMP signaling in the limb 23 B. BMP target genes 27 V. Hoxa13 and embryonic development 30 A. The Hoxa13-GFP mouse model 30 B. Hoxa13 mutant phenotypes 34 C. HOXA 13 homeodomain 35 D. HOXA 13 protein-protein interactions 36 E. HOXA 13 target genes 37 VI. Hypothesis and Rationale 39 CHAPTER 2: HOXA13 regulates Bmp2 and Bmp7 40 I. Abstract 42 II. Introduction 43 Ill. Results 46 IV. Discussion 69 v. Materials and Methods 75 VI. Acknowledgements 83 11 CHAPTER 3: Quantitative analysis of HOXA13 function 84 HOXA 13 regulation of Sostdc1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contributions of George Beadle and Edward Tatum
    | PERSPECTIVES Biochemical Genetics and Molecular Biology: The Contributions of George Beadle and Edward Tatum Bernard S. Strauss1 Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 KEYWORDS George Beadle; Edward Tatum; Boris Ephrussi; gene action; history It will concern us particularly to take note of those cases in Genetics in the Early 1940s which men not only solved a problem but had to alter their mentality in the process, or at least discovered afterwards By the end of the 1930s, geneticists had developed a sophis- that the solution involved a change in their mental approach ticated, self-contained science. In particular, they were able (Butterfield 1962). to predict the patterns of inheritance of a variety of charac- teristics, most morphological in nature, in a variety of or- EVENTY-FIVE years ago, George Beadle and Edward ganisms although the favorites at the time were clearly Tatum published their method for producing nutritional S Drosophila andcorn(Zea mays). These characteristics were mutants in Neurospora crassa. Their study signaled the start of determined by mysterious entities known as “genes,” known a new era in experimental biology, but its significance is to be located at particular positions on the chromosomes. generally misunderstood today. The importance of the work Furthermore, a variety of peculiar patterns of inheritance is usually summarized as providing support for the “one gene– could be accounted for by alteration in chromosome struc- one enzyme” hypothesis, but its major value actually lay both ture and number with predictions as to inheritance pattern in providing a general methodology for the investigation of being quantitative and statistical.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes, Genomes and Genetic Analysis
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION UNIT 1 © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORDefining SALE OR DISTRIBUTION and WorkingNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION with Genes © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Chapter 1 Genes, Genomes, and Genetic Analysis Chapter 2 DNA Structure and Genetic Variation © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Molekuul/Science Photo Library/Getty Images. © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 9781284136609_CH01_Hartl.indd 1 08/11/17 8:50 am © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC
    [Show full text]
  • DNA the Central Dogma 3.4: Genes, Central Dogma • 3.5: Cell Division-Mitosis and Meiosis, • 3.6: Chromosomal Involvement, DNA Level of Involvement
    U3 DNA the Central Dogma 3.4: Genes, Central Dogma • 3.5: Cell Division-Mitosis and Meiosis, • 3.6: Chromosomal involvement, DNA level of involvement. CENTRAL DOGMA • What is the central dogma of DNA? • The central dogma of molecular biology describes the two-step process, transcription and translation, by which the information in genes flows into proteins: DNA → RNA → protein. Transcription is the synthesis of an RNA copy of a segment of DNA. • Transcription is the synthesis of an RNA copy of a segment of DNA. RNA is synthesized by the enzyme RNA polymerase. Genes Are Located on Chromosomes (1910 – 1920s) Thomas Hunt Morgan discovers that genes are located on chromosomes. Working on fruit flies, he concludes that certain traits are linked to gender and that those traits are probably carried on one of the sex chromosomes (X or Y). He hypothesizes that other genes are also carried on specific chromosomes. Using chromosome recombination, he and his students map the locations of genes on chromosomes. Morgan and his students write the seminal book “The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity”. Genes Control Biochemical Events George Beadle and Edward Tatum (1930) discover through experiments on neurospora, a bread mold, that genes are responsible for the production of enzymes. Their report is the genesis of the "one gene-one enzyme" concept. DNA Is the Genetic Material (1928, 1944, 1952) ◊ Several scientists prove that DNA is the chemical basis of genetic information. ◊ Oswald Avery proves that DNA carries genetic information. ◊ Linus Pauling discovers that many proteins take the shape of a spiral, like a spring coil.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Mcclintock
    Barbara McClintock Lee B. Kass and Paul Chomet Abstract Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983, is best known for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. This chapter provides an overview of many of her key findings, some of which have been outlined and described elsewhere. We also provide a new look at McClintock’s early contributions, based on our readings of her primary publications and documents found in archives. We expect the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. 1 Introduction This chapter is focused on the scientific contributions of Barbara McClintock, pioneering plant geneticist and winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1983 for her discovery of transposable genetic elements in corn. Her enlightening experiments and discoveries have been outlined and described in a number of papers and books, so it is not the aim of this report to detail each step in her scientific career and personal life but rather highlight many of her key findings, then refer the reader to the original reports and more detailed reviews. We hope the reader will gain insight and appreciation for Barbara McClintock’s unique perspective, elegant experiments and unprecedented scientific achievements. Barbara McClintock (1902–1992) was born in Hartford Connecticut and raised in Brooklyn, New York (Keller 1983). She received her undergraduate and graduate education at the New York State College of Agriculture at Cornell University. In 1923, McClintock was awarded the B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Street Railway Journal
    ; OCT 2 1890 I NEW YORK: I I CHICAGO* ) Vol. i. liberty Street.) October, 1885. I 32 \12 Lakeside Building./ NO. 12. President Calvin A. Richards. advance of the times; to do that, has now family circle engrossing all his time out- become a motto with him and guides him side of business hours. The subject of our sketch, President of in all his railroad transactions. the American Street Railway Association The railroad which he represents is now The Car Timer's Last Gasp. and of the Metropolitan Railroad, of Bos- probably the largest street railroad in the ton, was born in Dorchester Mass., fifty- world in equipment, in miles of track, and "Timers is like machines," said a gray, seven years ago, and received his educa- in the number of passengers carried. oracular driver on the Third avenue line. tion in the public schools of "Timers is like machines. Boston. His business train- They gets so used to timin' ing was received with his that they can't let up, but father, an old and honored keeps along at it sleepin' or merchant of Boston. wakin'. If some o' them Mr. Richards was en- fellers was a-dyin' they'd gaged in business, him- want to spot the ticker afore self, until 1872, when he peggin' out, just to see if retired from active work, death was up to the scratch. and with his family, made Why, there was Pete Long a long visit to Europe. On —the allfiredest particular- his return from abroad, he ist man I ever see.
    [Show full text]
  • A Giant of Genetics Cornell University As a Graduate Student to Work on the Cytogenetics of George Beadle, an Uncommon Maize
    BOOK REVIEW farm after obtaining his baccalaureate at Nebraska Ag, he went to A giant of genetics Cornell University as a graduate student to work on the cytogenetics of George Beadle, An Uncommon maize. On receiving his Ph.D. from Cornell in 1931, Beadle was awarded a National Research Council fellowship to do postdoctoral work in T. H. Farmer: The Emergence of Genetics th Morgan’s Division of Biology at Caltech, where the fruit fly, Drosophila, in the 20 Century was then being developed as the premier experimental object of van- By Paul Berg & Maxine Singer guard genetics. On encountering Boris Ephrussi—a visiting geneticist from Paris— Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, at Caltech, Beadle began his work on the mechanism of gene action. 2003 383 pp. hardcover, $35, He and Ephrussi studied certain mutants of Drosophila whose eye ISBN 0-87969-688-5 color differed in various ways from the red hue characteristic of the wild-type fly. They inferred from these results that the embryonic Reviewed by Gunther S Stent development of animals consists of a series of chemical reactions, each step of which is catalyzed by a specific enzyme, whose formation is, in http://www.nature.com/naturegenetics turn, controlled by a specific gene. This inference provided the germ for Beadle’s one-gene-one-enzyme doctrine. To Beadle and Ephrussi’s “Isaac Newton’s famous phrase reminds us that major advances in disappointment, however, a group of German biochemists beat them science are made ‘on the shoulders of giants’. Too often, however, the to the identification of the actual chemical intermediates in the ‘giants’ in our field are unknown to many colleagues and biosynthesis of the Drosophila eye color pigments.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Lederberg – in Memoriam
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Joshua Lederberg – In Memoriam The foundations of the young science of molecular biology were laid towards the middle of the last century, primarily resting on a series of outstanding discoveries where microorganisms played a significant role. The exploitation of bacteria to address fundamental questions related to the nature of genes and how they function unleashed a steady stream of path-breaking discoveries during the 1940s and 50s. This was rather ironic since the term bacterial genetics would have been considered an oxymoron only a few years ago as the idea of bacteria possessing genes was alien to most geneticists who were busy working with plants, flies, and fungi. Joshua Lederberg, who passed away in February 2008, was one of the undisputed leaders of this molecular biology revolution. Lederberg’s work led to the discovery of two forms of genetic exchange in bacteria – conjugation and transduction. These discoveries had an enormous impact in opening up the genetic analysis of bacteria that resulted in other major breakthroughs such as the elucidation of the mechanism of gene regulation. For his contribu- tions to microbial genetics, Lederberg shared the 1958 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine with Edward Tatum and George Beadle. Lederberg’s contributions however did not confine only to the field of bacterial genetics. He was keenly interested in exotic areas such as artificial intelligence, extra-terrestrial life (exobiology) and space exploration and made significant contributions to these fields too. He also championed the cause of disarmament and elimination of biological weapons. In a sense, he was also a science journalist as he regularly contributed articles dealing with science and public issues in the Washington Post and The Chronicle.
    [Show full text]
  • All Living Organisms Are Organised Into Large Groups Called Kingdoms. Fungi Were Orig
    What are fungi and how important are they? All living organisms are organised into large groups called Kingdoms. Fungi were originally placed in the Plant Kingdom then, scientists learned that fungi were more closely related to animals than to plants. Then scientists decided that fungi were not sufficiently similar to animals to be placed in the animal kingdom and so today fungi have their own Kingdom – the Fungal Kingdom. There are thought to be around up to 3.8 million species of fungi, of which only 120,000 have been named. The fungal kingdom is largely hidden from our view and we usually only see the “fruit” of a fungus. The living body of a fungus is called a mycelium and is made up of a branching network of filaments known as hyphae. Fungal mycelia are usually hidden in a food source like wood and we only know they are there when they develop mushrooms or other fruiting bodies. Some fungi only produce microscopic fruiting bodies and we never notice them. Fungi feed by absorbing nutrients from the organic material that they live in. They digest their food before they absorb it by secreting acids and enzymes. Different fungi have evolved to live on various types of organic matter, some live on plants (Magneportha grisea – the rice blast fungus), some on animals (Trichophyton rubrum - the athlete’s foot fungus) and some even live on insects (Cordyceps australis). Helpful fungi Most of us use fungi every day without even knowing it. We eat mushrooms and Quorn, but we also prepare many other foods using fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Drugs Destroying Sport?
    Can C 0 U n t r i e s Fin d Coo per a tiD n Ami d the R u i nos 0 feD n f lie t ? ARE DRUGS IN THI S IS SUE DESTROYING The Gann Years: Colm Connolly '91 Wins Hail to "The Counselor" A Retrospective High-Profile Murder Case Sonja Henning '95 SPORT? Page 8 Letters to the Editor If you want to respond to an article in Duke Law, you can e-mail the editor at [email protected] or write: Mirinda Kossoff Duke Law Magazine Duke University School of Law Box 90389 Durham, NC 27708-0389 , a Interim Dean's Message Features Ethnic Strife: Can Countries Find Cooperation Amid the Ruins of Conflict? .. ..... ... ...... ...... ...... .............. .... ... ... .. ............ 2 The Gann Years: A Retrospective .. ............. ..... ................. .... ..... .. ................ ..... ...... ......... 5 Are Drugs Destroying Sport? .. ..................................... .... .. .............. .. ........ .. ... ....... .... ... 8 Alumni Snapshots Colm Connolly '91 Wins Conviction and Fame in High-Profile Murder Case ................... .................. ... .. ..... ..... ... .... .... ...... ....... ....... ..... 12 Sonja Henning '95: Hail to "The Counselor" on the Basketball Court ........................ .. 14 U.N. Insider Michael Scharf '88 Puts International Experience to Work in Academe ................................... ..................... ... .............................. ....... 15 Faculty Perspectives Q&A: Can You Treat a Financially Troubled Country Like a Bankrupt Company? .. ..... ... 17 The Docket Professor John Weistart: The Man
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]