DOCSLIB.ORG

Huisman Product Brochure Vessel Designs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Huisman Product Brochure Vessel Designs VESSEL DESIGNS HUISMAN PRODUCT BROCHURE VESSEL DESIGNS TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 GENERAL 03 1.1 Introduction 03 1.2 Development 03 02 DRILL SHIPS 06 2.1 HuisDrill 12000 06 03 MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS 07 3.1 Orion Class 07 3.2 JBF 14000 08 3.3 JBF Winterized 09 3.4 JBF Arctic 10 04 PIPE LAYING VESSELS 11 4.1 650t Flex Lay Vessel 12 4.2 300t Flex Lay Vessel 13 05 CRANE VESSELS 14 5.1 5000mt Crane Vessel 14 5.2 5000mt Crane Vessel with S-lay system on deck 15 5.3 5000mt Crane Vessel with S-lay system under deck 16 5.4 Crane Barge 17 06 WIND TURBINE INSTALLATION VESSELS 18 6.1 Wind Turbine Shuttle 18 01 GENERAL and local structural calculations. The inspection and repairs of the existing pontoon including new reinforcements and 1.1 Introduction modifications, as well as the construction and assembly of Alongside Huisman’s core business of designing and the catamaran was performed by Huisman. The cranes were manufacturing cranes, drilling equipment, pipe laying systems, designed, built, and delivered by Huisman. and winches; Huisman also offers complete in-house solutions in vessel design to meet our client’s requirements. In 1999, when the bridge construction project was finished, a The advantage of performing the vessel design in house is the major conversion of the Rambiz was performed by Huisman. ability to achieve a highly integrated and fully optimised vessel The modifications included reduction of the vessels breadth, design. For example, the drilling equipment on a drillship by shortening the cross-beam, and increasing the length. All forms the integral part of the vessel lay out. Design of this design work was done by Huisman. The manufacturing was equipment is closely linked to the development of the vessel subcontracted to Damen Shipyard. design. The vessel is virtually designed around the dedicated equipment. The Huisman Naval Architectural Department is responsible for the concept and basic design of different types of vessels including drill ships, mobile offshore drilling units, crane barges, pipe laying vessels, construction vessels, and vessels for the wind turbine installation industry. 1.2 Development Historically, Huisman has always been involved to some extent in vessel designs in discussions and agreements between the vessel owner, ship yard, and the vessel design bureau concerning the incorporation and layout of its equipment into the vessel design. Over time Huisman developed considerable vessel design expertise, which resulted in establishing our own dedicated Naval Architectural Department. The following key projects played an important role in this development: 1995 - SHEERLEG RAMBIZ In 1995 Huisman designed a sheerleg catamaran dedicated for a bridge construction project in shallow water. The sheerleg was built from three existing pontoons. The design work included the full vessel design package approved by Lloyd’s; extensive model testing and hydro-mechanical calculations subcontracted by Huisman to MARIN, the global 3 VESSEL DESIGNS 1995-1998 – PRIDE AMETHYST 2 CLASS SEMI- SUBMERSIBLE RIGS In the period 1995-1998 Huisman took active part in the design of the Pride Amethyst 2 Class semi-submersible drilling rigs. Huisman performed all global strength calculations of the semi-submersible design and was responsible for model testing at MARIN and the evaluation of the tests. The semi- submersible has a unique vertical riser storage designed by Huisman. Three semi-submersible units were built and these units are already more than 12 years in service. 2005 - SAPURA3000 The conceptual lay out of the vessel was performed by Huisman. The basic design was subsequently performed by Sea of Solutions. Huisman took active part in the hydro-dynamic analysis of the ship, including the performance of model tests. The crane structural integration analysis and a number of verification calculations and studies, including the stability analysis, the longitudinal strength, and the midship section design were carried out by Huisman. The cranes, the stinger and the pipe laying equipment were designed, built, and delivered by Huisman. 2004-2009 – JUMBO SHIPPING J1800 CLASS VESSELS As from the year 2004 Huisman delivered several 900mt mast cranes for the J1800 Class vessels of Jumbo Shipping. Besides the delivery of the 900mt Heavy Lifting Mast Cranes Huisman was also responsible for the structural design of the vessel structures forming the foundation of the cranes. The drawworks of the cranes were integrated as low as possible in the ship structure to optimize the layout and to improve the stability of the vessel. 4 2006 - BIG LIFT VESSEL Huisman delivered two 900mt mast cranes for a BigLift heavy lift transport vessel. The design and manufacturing of part of the vessels wing sections forming the crane foundation was performed by Huisman. This was done in close cooperation with the shipyard resulting in a highly optimized and fully integrated design. A detailed FEM analysis was performed which incorporated the crane loads, hydrostatic loads, the still water bending moment, loads from the main, auxiliary and tugger winches and the loads from the tween deck and main deck hatch covers. The main deck and tween decks inside the crane were designed to accommodate all equipment required for the crane to operate. Ventilation of the aft engine room has been incorporated in the mast of the aft crane. 2008 - HUISMAN DRILL SHIP “HUISDRILL” The year 2008 became a major milestone when Noble Drilling signed a contract with STX Shipyard for delivery of the Drill Ship “Globetrotter I” and with Huisman for delivery of the drilling equipment set for this vessel. The conceptual and basic design of the vessel was performed by Huisman. Great care was taken for highly optimised integration of the equipment into the vessel. This allowed developing a compact vessel with a payload and performance comparable to much larger drill ships. The design development included extensive R&D work and model testing, resulting in a vessel design with high DP performance and excellent seakeeping characteristics. The “Globetrotter I” was delivered in 2012. The second vessel “Globetrotter II” was delivered in 2013 also for Noble Drilling. 5 VESSEL DESIGNS 02 DRILL SHIPS 2.1 HuisDrill 12,000 The HuisDrill 12000 is a dynamically positioned drill ship suitable for 12000ft water depth. The vessel is suitable for worldwide unrestricted service. The vessel’s main task is exploration and development drilling in the waters offshore Brazil, Africa or the Gulf of Mexico. The vessel with its integrated drilling equipment is suitable for: Exploration and Production drilling operations Coiled tubing operations Installation of X-mas trees Well testing Main particulars Length overall 189.0 [m] Length between PP 173.6 [m] Breadth 32.2 [m] Depth to main deck 18.9 [m] Design draft 12.0 [m] Displacement 54000 [mt] Deadweight 29000 [mt] Drillers payload 20000 [mt] Service speed 12 [kts] Dynamic Positioning DP3 [-] Accommodation 180 [-] Power generation 36.8 [MW] Power propulsion 22.2 [MW] Drilling Dual Multi-Purpose Drilling Tower Hook load 2 x 1090 [mt] 6 03 MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS 3.1 Orion Class The Orion Class semi-submersible drilling units are based on one hull design which can be customized according to owner requirements. The design can be customized for water depths of 500m, 900m, 1500m, and 2500m. The units with design water depth of 500m and 900m meters will be equipped with a mooring system and thruster assist. The units designed for 1500m and 2500 are fully dynamic positioned. The unit is suitable for worldwide unrestricted service. The unit’s main task is exploration and development drilling. The unit with its integrated drilling equipment is suitable for: Exploration and Production drilling operations Completions Well Intervention and well testing Installation of X-mas trees Main particulars Length deck box 79.2 [m] Width deck box 67.2 [m] Height deck box 9.0 [m] Length pontoons 103.2 [m] Height of main deck above baseline 41.4 [m] Operational draft 20.0 [m] Transit draft 10.5 [m] Operational displacement 42000 [mt] Deadweight (operational draft) 16000 [mt] Drillers payload (operational draft) 10000 [mt] Service speed 9.0-11.0 [kts] Dynamic positioning Mooring/DP3 [-] Accommodation 130-180 [-] Power generation 28.8-38.4 [MW] Power propulsion 14.0-28.0 [MW] Drilling Dual Multi-Purpose Drilling Tower Hook load 2 x 1090 [mt] 7 VESSEL DESIGNS 3.2 JBF 14000 The JBF 14000 is a dynamically positioned semi-submersible drilling unit suitable for 14000ft water depth. The unit is suitable for worldwide unrestricted service. The unit’s main task is exploration and development drilling. The unit with its integrated drilling equipment is suitable for: Exploration and Production drilling operations Coiled tubing operations Installation of X-mas trees Well testing Completions Main particulars Length deck box 89.0 [m] Width deck box 69.6 [m] Height deck box 9.6 [m] Length pontoons 110.4 [m] Height of main deck above baseline 39.2 [m] Operational draft 15.6-19.6 [m] Transit draft 9.3 [m] Operational displacement 53000 [mt] Deadweight (operational draft) 25000 [mt] Drillers payload (operational draft) 15000 [mt] Service speed 8 [kts] Dynamic positioning DP3 [-] Accommodation 210 [-] Power generation 38.7 [MW] Power propulsion 28.0 [MW] Drilling Dual Multi-Purpose Drilling Tower Hook load 2 x 1090 [mt] 8 3.3 JBF Winterized The JBF Winterized is a dynamically positioned semi- submersible drilling unit suitable for 10000ft water depth. The unit is suitable for worldwide unrestricted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Det Norske Veritas
    DET NORSKE VERITAS Report Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Report No./DNV Reg No.: 2011-0053/ 12RJ7IW-4 Rev 00, 2011-01-18 DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 2 PHASE 1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 3 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 General ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Arctic waters delimitation .......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Heavy fuel oil definition and fuel descriptions .......................................................... 4 3.4 Application of AIS data.............................................................................................. 5 3.5 Identifying the vessels within the Arctic.................................................................... 6 3.6 Identifying the vessels using HFO as fuel.................................................................. 7 4 TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF USING HFO
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-Ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry
    www.RenewableUK.com Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry Issue 2: 2013 RUK13-019-02 2 Industry guidance aimed at jack-up owners operators, developers and contractors engaged in site-investigation, construction, operation and maintenance of offshore wind and marine energy installations. Acknowledgements RenewableUK acknowledges the time, effort, experience and expertise of all those who have contributed to this document. This Issue 2 of these guidelines was prepared for RenewableUK by London Offshore Consultants. This was in consultation with key consultees listed at the end of this document, RenewableUK members and key industry stakeholders. Status of this Document RenewableUK Health and Safety Guidelines are intended to provide information on particular technical, legal or policy issues relevant to the core membership base of RenewableUK. Their objective is to provide industry-specific guidance, for example where current information could be considered absent or incomplete. Health and Safety Guidelines are likely to be subject to review and updating, and so the latest version of the guidelines must be referred to. Attention is also drawn to the disclaimer below. Disclaimer The contents of these guidelines are intended for information and general guidance only, and do not constitute advice, are not exhaustive and do not indicate any specific course of action. Detailed professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from action in relation to any of the contents of this guide, or the relevance or applicability of the information herein. RenewableUK is not responsible for the content of external websites included in these guidelines and, where applicable, the inclusion of a link to an external website should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site’s owners (or its products/services).
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Updated Estimate Of
    Part I - Updated Estimate of Fair Market Value of the S.S. Keewatin in September 2018 05 October 2018 Part I INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC. 5 October 2018 The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0 Ladies & Gentlemen We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and Black Carbon in Arctic Shipping, 2015 to 2025
    Prevalence of heavy fuel oil and black carbon in Arctic shipping, 2015 to 2025 BRYAN COMER, NAYA OLMER, XIAOLI MAO, BISWAJOY ROY, DAN RUTHERFORD MAY 2017 www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank James J. Winebrake for his critical review and advice, along with our colleagues Joe Schultz, Jen Fela, and Fanta Kamakaté for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and for data processing support. The authors sincerely thank the ClimateWorks Foundation for funding this study. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................1 1.1 Heavy fuel oil ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Black carbon .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policy context ..................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Bulletin Weekly, Vol. 53, December 11, 2019, No. 45
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection ◆ CUSTOMS BROKER USER FEE PAYMENT FOR 2020 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: General notice. SUMMARY: This document provides notice to customs brokers that the annual user fee that is assessed for each permit held by a broker, whether it may be an individual, partnership, association, or corpo- ration, is due by January 31, 2020. Pursuant to fee adjustments required by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST ACT) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations, the annual user fee payable for calendar year 2020 will be $147.89. DATES: Payment of the 2020 Customs Broker User Fee is due by January 31, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melba Hubbard, Broker Management Branch, Office of Trade, (202) 325–6986, or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Pursuant to section 111.96 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regu- lations (19 CFR 111.96(c)), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assesses an annual user fee for each customs broker district and national permit held by an individual, partnership, association, or corporation. CBP regulations provide that this fee is payable for each calendar year in each broker district where the broker was issued a permit to do business by the due date. See 19 CFR 24.22(h) and (i)(9). Broker districts are defined in the General Notice entitled, ‘‘Geographic Boundaries of Customs Brokerage, Cartage and Light- erage Districts,’’ published in the Federal Register on March 15, 2000 (65 FR 14011), and corrected, with minor changes, on March 23, 2000 (65 FR 15686) and on April 6, 2000 (65 FR 18151).
    [Show full text]
  • Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships
    RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF SEA-GOING SHIPS PART I CLASSIFICATION Saint-Petersburg Edition 2019 Rules for the Classification and Construction of Sea-Going Ships of Russian Maritime Register of Shipping have been approved in accordance with the established approval procedure and come into force on 1 January 2019. The present edition of the Rules is based on the 2018 edition taking into account the amendments developed immediately before publication. The unified requirements, interpretations and recommendations of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) and the relevant resolutions of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have been taken into consideration. The Rules are published in the following parts: Part I "Classification"; Part II "Hull"; Part III "Equipment, Arrangements and Outfit"; Part IV "Stability"; Part V "Subdivision"; Part VI "Fire Protection"; Part VII "Machinery Installations"; Part VIII "Systems and Piping"; Part IX "Machinery"; Part X "Boilers, Heat Exchangers and Pressure Vessels"; Part XI "Electrical Equipment"; Part XII "Refrigerating Plants"; Part XIII "Materials"; Part XIV "Welding"; Part XV "Automation"; Part XVI "Structure and Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Ships"; Part XVII "Distinguishing Marks and Descriptive Notations in the Class Notation Specifying Structural and Operational Particulars of Ships"; Part XVIII "Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers". The text of the Part is identical to that of the IACS Common Structural Rules; Part XIX "Additional Requirements for Structures of Container Ships and Ships, Dedicated Primarily to Carry their Load in Containers". The text of the Part is identical to IACS UR S11A "Longitudinal Strength Standard for Container Ships" (June 2015) and S34 "Functional Requirements on Load Cases for Strength Assessment of Container Ships by Finite Element Analysis" (May 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Crane and S-Lay Vessel Huisman Product Brochure 5000Mt Crane and S-Lay Vessel
    5000MT CRANE AND S-LAY VESSEL HUISMAN PRODUCT BROCHURE 5000MT CRANE AND S-LAY VESSEL TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 DESCRIPTION 03 1.1 Vessel General 03 1.2 5000mt Offshore Mast Crane 04 1.3 600mt S-lay System 05 1.4 Design Options 06 1.5 Variable Draft Concept 07 1.6 Anti Heeling Systems 08 1.7 Accomodation 08 1.8 Power Generation and Propulsion 08 02 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 09 2.1 Vessel General 09 2.2 5000mt Offshore Mast Crane 10 2.3 600mt S-lay System 11 Before upgrade After upgrade 2 5000MT CRANE AND S-LAY VESSEL 1. DESCRIPTION 1.1 Vessel general The fully diesel electric, dynamically positioned (DP3) crane approx. 13000mt (approx. 10000mt after the S-lay System is vessel is equipped with a 5000mt Huisman Offshore Mast installed). Crane (OMC) and optionally a 600mt S-lay System. The crane and vessel are capable of fully revolving with 5000mt load. The vessel design is based on a variable draft concept. At The vessel is optimized for long transits at high speed up the transit draft the breadth of the vessel is limited which to 15 knots. The vessel is suitable for operating world-wide allows sailing at high speed and good motion characteristics including the following areas: China, Brazil, Gulf of Mexico, in waves. The pipe-laying operations and light lifts can be West of Africa, the North Sea, etc. also performed at this draft. For heavy lifts the vessel draft is increased. This increases the breadth of the water line in order The crane vessel is designed for multipurpose hoist- and- to provide sufficient stability for heavy lift operations.
    [Show full text]
  • IHMA and UKHO PORT INFORMATION PROJECT
    After a call for action during a IHMA congress in 2006 by the shipping industry, the IHMA and the UKHO have been working hard to come up with a structure for port information. IHMA and UKHO PORT INFORMATION PROJECT: FUNCTIONAL DEFINITIONS FOR NAUTICAL PORT INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 6 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 6 How this guide is organised:................................................................................................................ 7 Location Identifiers: ............................................................................................................................. 8 INDIVIDUAL PORT SECTIONS .................................................................................................................. 9 Port ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Roads ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Deep Water Route .............................................................................................................................. 9 Traffic Separation Scheme .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Positioning During Heavy Lift Operations
    Dynamic Positioning during Heavy Lift Operations Using fuzzy control techniques, Nonlinear Observer and H-Infinity Method Separately to Obtain Stable DP Systems for Heavy Lift Operations J. Ye Thesis for the degree of MSc in Marine Technology in the specialization of DPO – Marine Engineering Dynamic Positioning during Heavy Lift Operations By Jun Ye Performed at RH Marine This thesis (SDPO.16.007.m.) is classified as confidential in accordance with the general conditions for projects performed by the TUDelft. 31.03.2016 Company supervisor Responsible supervisor: E. El Amam Daily Supervisor(s): E. El Amam E-mail: [email protected] Thesis exam committee Chair/Responsible Professor: Prof. ir. J.J. Hopman Staff Member: Dr M. Godjevac Staff Member: Dr. R.R. Negenborn Company Member: E. El Amam Author Details Studynumber: 4274830 Author contact e-mail: [email protected] Summary Dynamic positioning has been developed for over half a century and is now widely used on board. However, the existing dynamic positioning system is not specially made with heavy lift vessels. This report is to solve the dynamic positioning problem during heavy lift operations. To fulfill this goal, the robustness and stability of the solutions are also considered. The solutions mentioned in this report are based on the RH Marine vessel model and the RH Marine dynamic positioning system. First the crane vessel model is reviewed and checked. Then the solutions are chosen and applied. At last the results are presented and analyzed. The stability of each solution is approached and the robustness of each solution is tested in Simulink.
    [Show full text]
  • DNVGL-RU-SHIP-Pt5ch10 Vessels for Special Operations
    RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships Edition October 2015 Part 5 Ship types Chapter 10 Vessels for special operations The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV GL AS ("DNV GL"). The user accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV GL and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV GL's prior written consent. DNV GL is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others. The electronic pdf version of this document, available free of charge from http://www.dnvgl.com, is the officially binding version. DNV GL AS FOREWORD DNV GL rules for classification contain procedural and technical requirements related to obtaining and retaining a class certificate. The rules represent all requirements adopted by the Society as basis for classification. © DNV GL AS October 2015 Any comments may be sent by e-mail to [email protected] If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of DNV GL, then DNV GL shall pay compensation to such person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Global Shipping, 2013–2015 (Olmer Et Al., 2017)
    Greenhouse gas emissions from global shipping, 2013-2015 Detailed methodology By: Naya Olmer Bryan Comer Biswajoy Roy Xiaoli Mao Dan Rutherford October 2017 Acknowledgments The authors thank Jen Fela and Joe Schultz for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and processing support and Global Fishing Watch and IHS Fairplay for contributing vessel characteristics data. This study was funded through the generous support of the ClimateWorks Foundation. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900 Washington DC 20005 USA © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Detailed methodology ........................................................................................................... 1 2.1 IHS data preprocessing .................................................................................................................1 2.2 AIS data preprocessing .................................................................................................................4 2.3 Matching AIS data with IHS data and GFW data ........................................................................7 2.4 Estimating ship emissions ..........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]