DOCSLIB.ORG

Det Norske Veritas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DET NORSKE VERITAS Report Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Report No./DNV Reg No.: 2011-0053/ 12RJ7IW-4 Rev 00, 2011-01-18 DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 2 PHASE 1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 3 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 General ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Arctic waters delimitation .......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Heavy fuel oil definition and fuel descriptions .......................................................... 4 3.4 Application of AIS data.............................................................................................. 5 3.5 Identifying the vessels within the Arctic.................................................................... 6 3.6 Identifying the vessels using HFO as fuel.................................................................. 7 4 TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF USING HFO IN THE ARCTIC.............................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Technical feasibility ................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Classification rules ..................................................................................................... 9 4.3 User experiences ...................................................................................................... 10 4.3.1 Tschudi Arctic Transit (TAT)............................................................................ 10 4.3.2 Swedish Maritime Administration (SMA) ........................................................ 11 4.3.3 Royal Arctic Line (RAL)................................................................................... 12 5 PATTERN OF SHIP TRAFFIC IN THE ARCTIC..................................................... 13 5.1 Type and number of vessels..................................................................................... 13 5.2 Traffic patterns in the Arctic .................................................................................... 14 5.2.1 All vessels in the Arctic – Density plot ............................................................. 15 5.2.2 All vessels – ship tracks..................................................................................... 16 5.2.3 Individual vessel types....................................................................................... 17 5.2.3.1 Oil tankers ................................................................................................. 17 5.2.3.2 Chemical/product Carriers ........................................................................ 18 5.2.3.3 Bulk Carriers ............................................................................................. 19 5.2.3.4 Container vessels....................................................................................... 20 5.2.3.5 General cargo vessels................................................................................ 21 5.2.3.6 Reefers....................................................................................................... 22 5.2.3.7 Ro-Ro vessels............................................................................................ 23 5.2.3.8 Passenger vessels ...................................................................................... 24 5.2.3.9 Offshore supply vessels............................................................................. 25 DNV Reg. No.: 12RJ7IW-4 Revision No.: 00 Date : 2011-01-19 Page ii of iv DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK 5.2.3.10 Other offshore vessels............................................................................... 26 5.2.3.11 Other activities .......................................................................................... 27 5.2.3.12 Fishing vessels .......................................................................................... 28 5.3 Seasonal variations................................................................................................... 29 5.4 Presentation of the results ........................................................................................ 29 5.5 Establishing trends and likely scenarios for the future ............................................29 6 VESSELS OPERATING ON HFO IN THE ARCTIC ................................................ 30 6.1.1 Density plot – All vessels versus vessels using HFO........................................ 32 6.1.2 Line plots – All vessels versus vessels using HFO ........................................... 33 7 VESSELS CARRYING HFO IN THE ARCTIC ......................................................... 34 7.1 Ships potentially transporting HFO.......................................................................... 34 7.2 Bunkering samples taken within the Arctic ............................................................. 36 8 PARTICULAR ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS FROM HFO IN THE ARCTIC........ 38 8.1 Properties specific to HFO regarding oil spills in the Arctic ................................... 38 8.2 Particular aspects of Arctic environmental conditions and vulnerability from spills ......................................................................................................................... 39 8.2.1 Temperature and light........................................................................................ 40 8.2.2 Remoteness........................................................................................................ 40 8.2.3 Natural recourses ............................................................................................... 40 8.2.4 Ice and snow ...................................................................................................... 41 8.3 Risk mitigation measures ......................................................................................... 42 8.4 Exhaust emissions/Black Carbon............................................................................. 42 9 INTERNATIONAL REGULATION REGARDING THE USE OR CARRIAGE OF HEAVY FUEL OILS ......................................................................... 44 9.1 Use of heavy fuel oils............................................................................................... 44 9.1.1 IMO requirements under revised MARPOL Annex VI....................................44 9.1.2 Additional IMO requirements in the Antarctic area.......................................... 45 9.1.3 Additional US/Californian regulations on fuel types ........................................ 45 9.1.4 Additional EU legislation .................................................................................. 45 9.1.5 Additional national legislation within the Svalbard archipelago (Norway) ...... 46 9.2 Carriage of heavy grade oils..................................................................................... 46 9.2.1 Operational discharges....................................................................................... 46 9.2.2 Additional IMO requirements in the Antarctic areas ........................................ 47 9.2.3 Additional national legislation within the Svalbard archipelago (Norway) ...... 47 9.2.4 Additional requirements in certain Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs) ............................................................................................................. 47 DNV Reg. No.: 12RJ7IW-4 Revision No.: 00 Date : 2011-01-19 Page iii of iv DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK 10 FUTURE WORK............................................................................................................. 47 11 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 48 APPENDIX I Appendix II DNV Reg. No.: 12RJ7IW-4 Revision No.: 00 Date : 2011-01-19 Page iv of iv DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK SUMMARY The Arctic Council working group on the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) at its meeting in Copenhagen in March 2010, agreed to carry out Phase I of a project to identify the use and carriage of heavy oil fuel (HFO) by ships in the Arctic region. The objective of project as stated by PAME has been to prepare a report which summarizes the current traffic in the Arctic region as well as identifying the proportion of this traffic operating on HFO. In addition the risks related to the use and carriage of HFO in the Arctic is discussed and which mitigation strategies are available. Finally the status of international regulations regarding the use of HFO is discussed. In the study DNV has applied satellite based AIS (Automatic Identification System)
Recommended publications
  • Nilotic Livestock Transport in Ancient Egypt

    Nilotic Livestock Transport in Ancient Egypt

    NILOTIC LIVESTOCK TRANSPORT IN ANCIENT EGYPT A Thesis by MEGAN CHRISTINE HAGSETH Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Shelley Wachsmann Committee Members, Deborah Carlson Kevin Glowacki Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2015 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2015 Megan Christine Hagseth ABSTRACT Cattle in ancient Egypt were a measure of wealth and prestige, and as such figured prominently in tomb art, inscriptions, and even literature. Elite titles and roles such as “Overseer of Cattle” were granted to high ranking officials or nobility during the New Kingdom, and large numbers of cattle were collected as tribute throughout the Pharaonic period. The movement of these animals along the Nile, whether for secular or sacred reasons, required the development of specialized vessels. The cattle ferries of ancient Egypt provide a unique opportunity to understand facets of the Egyptian maritime community. A comparison of cattle barges with other Egyptian ship types from these same periods leads to a better understand how these vessels fit into the larger maritime paradigm, and also serves to test the plausibility of aspects such as vessel size and design, composition of crew, and lading strategies. Examples of cargo vessels similar to the cattle barge have been found and excavated, such as ships from Thonis-Heracleion, Ayn Sukhna, Alexandria, and Mersa/Wadi Gawasis. This type of cross analysis allows for the tentative reconstruction of a vessel type which has not been identified previously in the archaeological record.
  • [BA] COUNTRY [BA] SECTION [Ba] Greenland

    [BA] COUNTRY [BA] SECTION [Ba] Greenland

    [ba] Validity date from [BA] COUNTRY [ba] Greenland 26/08/2013 00081 [BA] SECTION [ba] Date of publication 13/08/2013 [ba] List in force [ba] Approval [ba] Name [ba] City [ba] Regions [ba] Activities [ba] Remark [ba] Date of request number 153 Qaqqatisiaq (Royal Greenland Seagfood A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 219 Markus (Qajaq Trawl A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 390 Polar Princess (Polar Seafood Greenland A/S) Qeqertarsuaq Vestgronland [ba] FV 401 Polar Qaasiut (Polar Seafood Greenland A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 425 Sisimiut (Royal Greenland Seafood A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 4406 Nataarnaq (Ice Trawl A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 4432 Qeqertaq Fish ApS Ilulissat Vestgronland [ba] PP 4469 Akamalik (Royal Greenland Seafood A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 4502 Regina C (Niisa Trawl ApS) Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] FV 4574 Uummannaq Seafood A/S Uummannaq Vestgronland [ba] PP 4615 Polar Raajat A/S Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] CS 4659 Greenland Properties A/S Maniitsoq Vestgronland [ba] PP 4660 Arctic Green Food A/S Aasiaat Vestgronland [ba] PP 4681 Sisimiut Fish ApS Sisimiut Vestgronland [ba] PP 4691 Ice Fjord Fish ApS Nuuk Vestgronland [ba] PP 1 / 5 [ba] List in force [ba] Approval [ba] Name [ba] City [ba] Regions [ba] Activities [ba] Remark [ba] Date of request number 4766 Upernavik Seafood A/S Upernavik Vestgronland [ba] PP 4768 Royal Greenland Seafood A/S Qeqertarsuaq Vestgronland [ba] PP 4804 ONC-Polar A/S Alluitsup Paa Vestgronland [ba] PP 481 Upernavik Seafood A/S Upernavik Vestgronland [ba] PP 4844 Polar Nanoq (Sigguk A/S) Nuuk Vestgronland
  • Road Construction in Greenland – the Greenlandic Case

    Road Construction in Greenland – the Greenlandic Case

    THIS PROJECT IS BEING PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND ROAD CONSTRUCTION IN GREENLAND – THE GREENLANDIC CASE October 2007 Arne Villumsen Anders Stuhr Jørgensen Abdel Barten Janne Fritt-Rasmussen Laust Løgstrup Niels Brock Niels Hoedeman Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Sara Borre Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen ROAD CONSTRUCTION IN GREENLAND – THE GREENLANDIC CASE October 2007 Arne Villumsen Anders Stuhr Jørgensen Abdel Barten Janne Fritt-Rasmussen Laust Løgstrup Niels Brock Niels Hoedeman Ragnhildur Gunnarsdóttir Sara Borre Thomas Ingeman-Nielsen Translation: J. Richard Wilson CONTENTS 1. GEOLOGY, NatURE AND CLIMate OF GREENLAND ........................... 4 1.1. GEOLOGY. 4 1.2. CLIMate . .5 1.3. Weather AND CLIMate IN AND AROUND GREENLAND . .5 1.4. Precipitation . .5 1.5. Weather- AND CLIMate REGIONS IN GREENLAND . .6 1.6. PERMAFROST. .9 1.7. Vegetation. .10 2. Relevant INFORMation FOR ROAD-BUILDING PROJECTS IN GREENLAND ........................................................................................... 11 3. EXISTING ROADS IN towns AND VILLAGES IN GREENLAND ......... 17 3.1. EXAMination OF EXISTING ROADS IN towns AND VILLAGES IN GREENLAND. 19 3.1.1. ROADS IN SISIMIUT town. .19 3.1.2. SISIMIUT Airport . 19 3.1.3. THE ROAD FROM KANGERLUSSSUAQ to THE INLAND ICE. 20 3.1.4. KANGERLUSSUAQ Airport. 21 3.2. STUDIES OF ROADS ELSEWHERE IN GREENLAND. .22 3.2.1. SOUTH GREENLAND . 23 3.2.2. ILLORSUIT. .27 4. THE SISIMIUT-KANGERLUSSUAQ ROAD ............................................ 32 4.1. GEOLOGICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL overview. .32 4.2. SUitable Materials FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND PERMAFROST. .35 4.3. GEOLOGICAL MODEL FOR THE AREA. 39 4.4. SUMMARY. .55 4.5. ENVIRONMental AND conservation ASPECTS. .55 4.6. ROUTE PROPOSAL – GENERAL ASPECTS.
  • Natural Resources in the Nanortalik District

    Natural Resources in the Nanortalik District

    National Environmental Research Institute Ministry of the Environment Natural resources in the Nanortalik district An interview study on fishing, hunting and tourism in the area around the Nalunaq gold project NERI Technical Report No. 384 National Environmental Research Institute Ministry of the Environment Natural resources in the Nanortalik district An interview study on fishing, hunting and tourism in the area around the Nalunaq gold project NERI Technical Report No. 384 2001 Christain M. Glahder Department of Arctic Environment Data sheet Title: Natural resources in the Nanortalik district Subtitle: An interview study on fishing, hunting and tourism in the area around the Nalunaq gold project. Arktisk Miljø – Arctic Environment. Author: Christian M. Glahder Department: Department of Arctic Environment Serial title and no.: NERI Technical Report No. 384 Publisher: Ministry of Environment National Environmental Research Institute URL: http://www.dmu.dk Date of publication: December 2001 Referee: Peter Aastrup Greenlandic summary: Hans Kristian Olsen Photos & Figures: Christian M. Glahder Please cite as: Glahder, C. M. 2001. Natural resources in the Nanortalik district. An interview study on fishing, hunting and tourism in the area around the Nalunaq gold project. Na- tional Environmental Research Institute, Technical Report No. 384: 81 pp. Reproduction is permitted, provided the source is explicitly acknowledged. Abstract: The interview study was performed in the Nanortalik municipality, South Green- land, during March-April 2001. It is a part of an environmental baseline study done in relation to the Nalunaq gold project. 23 fishermen, hunters and others gave infor- mation on 11 fish species, Snow crap, Deep-sea prawn, five seal species, Polar bear, Minke whale and two bird species; moreover on gathering of mussels, seaweed etc., sheep farms, tourist localities and areas for recreation.
  • Etir Code Lists

    Etir Code Lists

    eTIR Code Lists Code lists CL01 Equipment size and type description code (UN/EDIFACT 8155) Code specifying the size and type of equipment. 1 Dime coated tank A tank coated with dime. 2 Epoxy coated tank A tank coated with epoxy. 6 Pressurized tank A tank capable of holding pressurized goods. 7 Refrigerated tank A tank capable of keeping goods refrigerated. 9 Stainless steel tank A tank made of stainless steel. 10 Nonworking reefer container 40 ft A 40 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 12 Europallet 80 x 120 cm. 13 Scandinavian pallet 100 x 120 cm. 14 Trailer Non self-propelled vehicle designed for the carriage of cargo so that it can be towed by a motor vehicle. 15 Nonworking reefer container 20 ft A 20 foot refrigerated container that is not actively controlling temperature of the product. 16 Exchangeable pallet Standard pallet exchangeable following international convention. 17 Semi-trailer Non self propelled vehicle without front wheels designed for the carriage of cargo and provided with a kingpin. 18 Tank container 20 feet A tank container with a length of 20 feet. 19 Tank container 30 feet A tank container with a length of 30 feet. 20 Tank container 40 feet A tank container with a length of 40 feet. 21 Container IC 20 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 20 feet. 22 Container IC 30 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 30 feet. 23 Container IC 40 feet A container owned by InterContainer, a European railway subsidiary, with a length of 40 feet.
  • Annual Report 2019 Annual Report 2019 I Port State Progression: Detention Rate Down

    Annual Report 2019 Annual Report 2019 I Port State Progression: Detention Rate Down

    THE PARIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL ON PORT MEMORANDUM STATE OF UNDERSTANDING PARIS THE Port State Progression Detention rate down ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 I PORT STATE PROGRESSION: DETENTION RATE DOWN II Port State Progression Detention rate down ANNUAL REPORT 2019 PORT STATE PROGRESSION: DETENTION RATE DOWN 2 Annual Report 2019 CONTENTS Introduction Chair and Secretary-General 4 Executive summary 6 Paris MoU developments 8 Facts & Figures 2019 14 Statistical Annexes Annual Report 2019 18 White List 27 Grey List 28 Black List 31 Explanatory note - “White”, “Grey” and “Black List” 56 Secretariat Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control 57 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 3 PORT STATE PROGRESSION: DETENTION RATE DOWN Introduction CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY-GENERAL During 2019 the Paris MoU continued with its work One of the important topics on the agenda was the further of inspecting ships on the basis of the relevant development of both flag and Recognized Organization (RO) performance lists. instruments of the Memorandum. This annual report provides an overview of the main activities In addition, the Committee took decisions in preparation for and developments within the Paris MoU for the the verification of compliance with the new MARPOL Annex VI requirements regarding the sulphur content of marine year. The annexes and tables provide details of the fuels (IMO 2020). results of inspections carried out by our Member Authorities. The Paris MoU invites those interested A Concentrated Inspection Campaign was carried out, in shipping to visit its website as a reliable source together with the Tokyo MoU, on emergency systems and procedures.
  • 78 EU-Approved Livestock Carriers

    78 EU-Approved Livestock Carriers

    78 EU-approved livestock carriers Written by Robin des Bois Supported by Animal Welfare Foundation and Tierschutzbund Zürich June 2021 Content Summary ………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………. 3 78 EU-approved livestock carriers ………………………………………….. 5 - Conversion ………………………………………………………… 5 - Age …………………………………………………………………. 7 - Flags ………………………………………………………………… 7 - Classification societies ……………………………………………. 8 - Shipowners ………………………………………………………… 12 - Ship Risk Profile …………………………………………………… 13 - Detentions and bans ………………………………………………. 14 - Deficiencies ………………………………………………………… 15 - Incidents ……………………………………………………………. 17 - The Queen Hind case …………………………………………….. 17 - Paralysis of the Suez Canal …………………..………………….. 20 Profile of 78 EU-approved livestock carriers ……………………………… 22 Appendixes …………………………………………………………………….. 146 - Appendix 1 : list of ships, IMO numbers and EU-Member State of approval ………………………………………………….. 147 - Appendix 2 : classification society, number of EU-approved livestock carriers and performance of the classification societiy according to Paris MoU …………………………………………… 149 - Appendix 3 : number of detentions throughout the ship's operational life and years of detentions …………………………. 150 - Appendix 4 : EU-approved livestock carriers reported with deficiencies …………………………………………………..…….. 153 - Appendix 5: Additional list of recently EU-approved livestock carriers ................................................................................…... 159 Sources ………………………………………………………………………… 165 This report was written
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector

    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector

    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
  • Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-Ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry

    Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-Ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry

    www.RenewableUK.com Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry Issue 2: 2013 RUK13-019-02 2 Industry guidance aimed at jack-up owners operators, developers and contractors engaged in site-investigation, construction, operation and maintenance of offshore wind and marine energy installations. Acknowledgements RenewableUK acknowledges the time, effort, experience and expertise of all those who have contributed to this document. This Issue 2 of these guidelines was prepared for RenewableUK by London Offshore Consultants. This was in consultation with key consultees listed at the end of this document, RenewableUK members and key industry stakeholders. Status of this Document RenewableUK Health and Safety Guidelines are intended to provide information on particular technical, legal or policy issues relevant to the core membership base of RenewableUK. Their objective is to provide industry-specific guidance, for example where current information could be considered absent or incomplete. Health and Safety Guidelines are likely to be subject to review and updating, and so the latest version of the guidelines must be referred to. Attention is also drawn to the disclaimer below. Disclaimer The contents of these guidelines are intended for information and general guidance only, and do not constitute advice, are not exhaustive and do not indicate any specific course of action. Detailed professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from action in relation to any of the contents of this guide, or the relevance or applicability of the information herein. RenewableUK is not responsible for the content of external websites included in these guidelines and, where applicable, the inclusion of a link to an external website should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site’s owners (or its products/services).
  • Basic Concepts of Maritime Transport and Its Present Status in Latin America and the Caribbean

    Basic Concepts of Maritime Transport and Its Present Status in Latin America and the Caribbean

    or. iH"&b BASIC CONCEPTS OF MARITIME TRANSPORT AND ITS PRESENT STATUS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN . ' ftp • ' . J§ WAC 'At 'li ''UWD te. , • • ^ > o UNITED NATIONS 1 fc r> » t 4 CR 15 n I" ti i CUADERNOS DE LA CEP AL BASIC CONCEPTS OF MARITIME TRANSPORT AND ITS PRESENT STATUS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN UNITED NATIONS Santiago, Chile, 1987 LC/G.1426 September 1987 This study was prepared by Mr Tnmas Sepûlveda Whittle. Consultant to ECLAC's Transport and Communications Division. The opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily coincide with those of the United Nations. Translated in Canada for official use by the Multilingual Translation Directorate, Trans- lation Bureau, Ottawa, from the Spanish original Los conceptos básicos del transporte marítimo y la situación de la actividad en América Latina. The English text was subse- quently revised and has been extensively updated to reflect the most recent statistics available. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS Sales No. E.86.II.G.11 ISSN 0252-2195 ISBN 92-1-121137-9 * « CONTENTS Page Summary 7 1. The importance of transport 10 2. The predominance of maritime transport 13 3. Factors affecting the shipping business 14 4. Ships 17 5. Cargo 24 6. Ports 26 7. Composition of the shipping industry 29 8. Shipping conferences 37 9. The Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences 40 10. The Consultation System 46 * 11. Conference freight rates 49 12. Transport conditions 54 13. Marine insurance 56 V 14.
  • Notes on the Colonial History of Greenland

    Notes on the Colonial History of Greenland

    Notes on the Colonial History of Greenland Møller, Helle. 2011.“You need to be double cultured to function here”: Toward an anthropology of Inuit nursing in Greenland and Nunavut. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Alberta. pp. 44-58. Footnote: Kalaallit Nuunat, the Greenlandic name for Greenland means “the people’s land” and Kalaallit “the people.” However, Kalaallit oftenrefer to themselves as Greenlanders and their language as Greenlandic, and these are the terms I will use in this dissertation. The name Greenland, or in Danish ‘Grønland,’ was given to the enormous island by the Norse Erik the Red when he first saw the deep and fertile fjords of southern Greenland (Mikkelsen & Kuipjers, 2000). Prior to Greenland’s vote on self-government there was an article in the newspaper Sermitsiaq and subsequently heated online debate among readers about the terms Inuit and Kalaallit, on account of a question from Doris Jacobsen, who is a member of the Home Rule government in the Greenlandic parliament, about whether Greenlanders should call themselves Kalaallit or Inuit with the advent of self-government (Aaqqissuisoqarfik, 2008). The majority of debaters seemed to agree that the proper name for Greenlanders, in Greenlandic today, is Kalaallit. This despite the fact that Greenlanders are ethnohistorically of Inuit descent, and that the origin of Kalaallit (singular: kalaaleq) may be skræling, which some sources point to as meaning skin in the Icelandic language, with reference to the skin clothing that the Inuit wore when the Norse first encountered them (Gulløv, 2000). According to other sources, skræling originates in the Scandinavian languages and means scrawny, which is how the Norse described the first Inuit they met (Gulløv, 2000).
  • Not to Be Cited Without Prior Reference to the Author(S)

    Not to Be Cited Without Prior Reference to the Author(S)

    NOT TO BE CITED WITHOUT PRIOR REFERENCE TO THE AUTHOR(S) Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N7091 NAFO SCR Doc. 20/043 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING – JUNE 2020 An assessment of the stocks of Greenland halibut in the South West Greenland fjords division 1BC, 1D and 1EF all located in NAFO subarea 1, using the Depletion Corrected Average Catch model. by Rasmus Nygaard Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 570, 3900 Nuuk, Greenland Summary The Greenland halibut fishery in the fjords in West Greenland started with the introduction of longlines about 110 years ago. The fishery is most pronounced in the Disko Bay, the Uummannaq fjord and the fjords near Upernavik, but the fishery in the other fjord areas further south in West Greenland has just as long a history with catch statistics going back to the 1960’s in all areas and even back to 1910 in the fjords around Qaqortoq in south Greenland (1F). In this study, the depletion corrected average catch (DCAC) model is used to approximate a sustainable level of catch, for the fjord stocks of Greenland halibut in NAFO subarea 1 subdivision 1BC, 1D and 1EF inshore. The harvest control rules suggested in the ICES DLS Guidance Report 2012 and supplementary knowledge can be used to advise a stepwise adjustment of the catch to the DCAC approximated sustainable level of catch in the coming years. The approximated sustainable level catch calculated through catch data from 1960 to present is 300 t in the combined area 1B and one 1C (the fjords around Sisimiut and Maniitsoq), 398 t in 1D (the fjords near Nuuk) and 222 t in the combined 1E and 1F area (fjords between Paamiut, Qaqortoq, narsaq and Nanortalik).