DOCSLIB.ORG

HCA HLL 20 August 2021 Mobile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HCA HLL 20 August 2021 Mobile HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances Acergy Viking 21.0 12.8 3 Multi Purpose Survey Vessel - Cat 3 - Bow deck • Daylight operations only. Misc Td/PM Lights not fitted • Approved Friction Surface - no net Green perimeter lights not co-incidental with Safe Landing Area Acta Centaurus 18.0 7.5t 3 Offshore Support Vessel (OSV) - Cat 3 bow mounted helideck. 6 • Stable conditions (UKCS) +/- 1° pitch and roll, 2m max heave Misc HMS Repeater lights upgrade not fitted • Approved friction surface. Aegir 22.8 15.6 1 Crane Barge 150° Vent duct pipe 2m from sla 46cm adl, minor infringement • Table 1(T) if overflight of 5:1 items is unavoidable 5:1 Forward foam monitor platform and wave radar approx 4m from edge of SLA. Bridge wings port and starboard aft infringe sector Aeolus 22.2 12.8 1 Jack Up • Daylight only operations - Aiming circle & "H" lights not fitted Misc Crane boom may infringe 210 sector outside of planned helicopter • Stable deck conditions apply whilst on the move - operations 1 º Pitch & roll and 2m heave – Non compliant HMS (Applicable whilst operating on UK continental shelf and for UK registered helicopter) Amazon Conqueror 22.8 15.6 3 Seismic Vessel - • Daylight Operations only - Circle & "H" lights not fitted • CAA Dispensation for HMS Rev.9B • Cat 3 – Bow deck Amundsen Spirit 20.8 12.8 1 • Tanker with amidships helideck on port side 8 • 2 x 150 degree Limited Obstacle sectors- 5:1 Main deck starboard of helideck • Table 1(T&L) if overflight of 5:1 obstruction unavoidable Misc No Circle and H Lights fitted • Daylight Operations only Copyright © 2021 Helideck Certification Agency Page 1 of 56 24 September 2021 12:36:03 HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances Artemis Odyssey 19,5 9,3 0 Research vessel 210° Marginal infringement port side handrails and fire monitor •Cat 2 stern mounted helideck 150° Handrails forward of helideck •Table 1 (T) if overflight of 5:1 obstruction unavoidable •Daylight operations only (check local exceptions) 5:1 Aft lantern mast protrudes 3m from SLA •Helideck net to be fitted for all operations. 30 kts wind Misc restriction if net removed Circle and H lights not fitted •No DG uplifted from vessel by helicopter Offset aiming circle Atlantis Dweller 20.9 12t 0 • Cat 3 Bow deck – Day Ops only when vessel into wind (Norway N/A ) Misc Approved Friction Surface • Cat 2 Night Ops permitted when vessel heading downwind. No DG to be uplifted from this vessel (Circle H lights fitted) Audacia 22.2 12.8 1 Pipe Laying Vessel - stern helideck • Daylight operations only -Circle & "H" light not fitted 5:1 Taut wire unit on port side when lowered, 315-045 •Table 2 due to superstructure and funnel on starboard side Aft, Port & Stbd Fwd Foam monitor platforms infringe sector approx Rel to bow •Table 1(T) if overflight of 5:1 infringements unavoidable 3.20m from SLA Misc 1.25D Helideck Aurora Spirit 20,8 14,6 1 Shuttle tanker Sig 5:1 8 •Amidships helideck port forward Main decking forward, aft and starboard of helideck •Table 1(T) if overflight of main decking unavoidable Misc Windsock not illuminated •Daylight operations only •No DG uplifted from vessel by helicopter Benguela Gem 22.8 12.8 3 Copyright © 2021 Helideck Certification Agency Page 2 of 56 24 September 2021 12:36:03 HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances BGP Prospector 22.8 15.6 3 Seismic Vessel - Bow helideck • Cat 3 Bow Helideck – Day Ops only when vessel into wind Misc No DGbA Packer/Shipper available. • Cat 2 Night Ops permitted when vessel heading downwind. (ICAO Heliport manual Doc 9261 edition 4 applies) Note: Ideally wind should be on Starboard Quarter for night Ops • Dangerous Goods NOT to be uplifted from vessel due to lack of trained shipper Bibby Wavemaster 1 20.8 12.8 3 MSV 210° Clear 8 • Cat 3 Bow Helideck – Day Ops only when vessel into wind 150° Clear Cat 2 Night Ops permitted when vessel heading downwind. (ICAO Heliport manual Doc 9261 edition 4 applies) 5:1 Main deck port and starboard side aft of 180° but within 210° sector. Note: Ideally wind should be on Starboard Quarter for night Misc Ops Circle H lights fitted • Table 1 (T) if overflight of the 5:1 infringement is unavoidable. • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Blackford Dolphin 22.2 9.3 1 • Semi Sub MODU Sig 5:1 • Table 1(T) if overflight of 5:1 infringements unavoidable Port access platform • Approved for EC 225 and S92 Forward access platform Fuel not available Lifeboat station and forward leg - stbd side Blue Tern 22.8 14.6 1 Jack Up 210° Crane Boom when in the rest. • Daylight ops onlydue to lack of TD/PM & H lights • Operations prohibited whilst on the move 5:1 Port & Stbd access monitor platforms and lifeboats • Landing prohibited unless crane boom/jib is in the raised Misc Crane jib may be at rest along port side of helideck outside of notified position helicopter flight times. clear of 210 degree OFS No circle and h lights fitted • No Dangerous Goods to be uplifted from this installation No qualified DG Shipper/Packer on board Boa Deep C 19.5 9.3 3 Offshore Support & Construction Vessel 2 • Daylight operations only - Aiming circle & "H" lights not fitted 5:1 Main deck Port and Starboard aft • Table 1(t) if overflight of 5:1 items are unavoidable Misc Approved for EC225 - 11t • Cat 3- Bow deck Copyright © 2021 Helideck Certification Agency Page 3 of 56 24 September 2021 12:36:03 HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances Boa Sub C 20.8 11.9 3 OSCV – Offshore Support & Construction Vessel 8m • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Boka Atlantis 22.2 12.0 3 DSV - Cat 3 - Bow deck. • Daylight operations only - No TDPM & H lighting >30Kts • No Helicopter operations • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Boka Da Vinci 22.2 12.0 3 DSV - Cat 3 - Bow Deck • Daylight Operations Only 5:1 Vessel structure and access points Port and Starboard aft • Table 1(t) if overflight of 5:1 Items is unavoidable Misc Circle & "H" lights not fitted • Landing Net fitted Non approved friction surface - Frictape net fitted • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Boka Polaris 19.5 9.2 3 OSV - Cat 3 Bow deck • Daylight ops only due to lack of TD/PM +H lights Misc No Circle/H lights fitted • Approved Friction Surface • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Boka Topaz 20.8 12.8 3 DSV - Cat 3 Bow deck 8 • Daylight operations only - Circle & "H" lights not fitted 5:1 Fore mast when lowered • Table 1 (T) if overflight of 5:1 infringement unavoidable Main deck port & stbd aft of 180° sector • Approved Friction surface Misc Circle & "H" lights not fitted • CAA Dispensation for SD2020/003 (HMS Rev.9B) Bokalift 1 22.4 12.8 3 Heavy lift vessel 150° Windsock 3.15m adl at 5.3m from SLA • Possible turbulence from turbine exhausts (port & stbd) • Turbulence reports requested 5:1 Bridge Wings - port and starboard Misc Approved friction surface - no net Dangerous Goods not to be uplifted from this location Copyright © 2021 Helideck Certification Agency Page 4 of 56 24 September 2021 12:36:03 HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances Bold Tern 22.2 12.8 F Self-propelled Jack up - 210° Tip of crane boom and luffing cables when in rest. • CAT 3 Bow deck for operations when underway Fwd Nav Mast if not stowed. • Mandatory ARA required for all operations 150° Guy lines connecting main mast to E-deck if not removed prior to • Table 1 (T) if overflight of 5:1 items is unavoidable heliops. • Caution - Before approach always check to ensure the OFS & LOS are clear. 5:1 Aft access platforms and vessel structure port and starboard aft infringe sector. Misc Crane boom/jib when in rest. Brave Tern 22.2 12.8 1 CAT 1 - Self-propelled Jack up - Bow deck 210° Crane Boom & Nav mast outside of notified helicopter times. • Table 1 (T) if overflight of 5:1 items is unavoidable • Crane Boom Tip & Nav mast infringes the 210 OFS outside Sig 5:1 Access points & vessel structure Port & Starboard aft infringes sector. of notified helicopter times. • Frictape Netlights installed. Connector 20.8 12.8 3 Offshore Construction Vessel 8 • Cat 3 - Bow deck 5:1 Vessel structure Port and Starboard aft of deck and forward access • Table 1(T) if overflight of 5:1 items unavoidable platform • Daylight ops only - TDPM & H lights not fitted Misc 1.25D helideck – Norwegian regulations +30Kts • No helicopter operations No net fitted (DIFFS) Not an approved friction surface COSL Innovator 22.2 12.8 1 Semi-submersible • 060-170 rel. • 0-30 •All types- Table 2 use 35-45kts limitation Misc Circle and H lights not fitted To rig head • 31 plus •AS332 - Max helipad weight •Other types- Nil Landings •All types – Nil Landings Turbulence reports by all types to be submitted •Daylight operations only (not applicable for Norway) •No starting equipment available •No DG uplifted from rig by helicopter Copyright © 2021 Helideck Certification Agency Page 5 of 56 24 September 2021 12:36:03 HCA HLL Mobile 24 September 2021 Name D t PRH Wind Kts Limitation Non Compliances COSL Promoter 22.2 12.8 1 • Semi- 060°-170° 20-30 Sub Misc No circle and h lights fitted rel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Det Norske Veritas
    DET NORSKE VERITAS Report Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Report No./DNV Reg No.: 2011-0053/ 12RJ7IW-4 Rev 00, 2011-01-18 DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 2 PHASE 1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 3 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 General ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Arctic waters delimitation .......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Heavy fuel oil definition and fuel descriptions .......................................................... 4 3.4 Application of AIS data.............................................................................................. 5 3.5 Identifying the vessels within the Arctic.................................................................... 6 3.6 Identifying the vessels using HFO as fuel.................................................................. 7 4 TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF USING HFO
    [Show full text]
  • Associazione Italiana Di Tecnica Navale 1947-2017 70 Anni a Sostegno Delle Attività Sul Mare E Sulle Acque Interne
    Mario Alimento, Claudio Boccalatte, Gianfranco Damilano e Bruno Della Loggia Associazione Italiana di Tecnica Navale 1947-2017 70 anni a sostegno delle attività sul mare e sulle acque interne Edizioni ETS Si ringrazia SiSi ringrazia ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringrazia Si ringrazia Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione Si Si ringraziano ringraziano le seguenti seguenti Aziende Aziende per per il il gentile gentile contributo alla Manifestazione contributo alla Manifestazione Si ringraziano le seguenti Aziende per il gentile contributo alla Manifestazione © Copyright 2017 Edizioni ETS Piazza Carrara, 16-19, I-56126 Pisa [email protected] www.edizioniets.com Distribuzione Messaggerie Libri SPA Sede legale: via G. Verdi 8 - 20090 Assago (MI) Promozione PDE PROMOZIONE SRL via Zago 2/2 - 40128 Bologna ISBN 978-884670000-0 Prefazione alla terza edizione 2017 Nel 2017 l’ATENA, Associazione Italiana di Tecnica Navale, celebra il suo settantesimo anniversario. Un recente ritrovamento di documenti ha reso pos- sibile datare al 1947 la fondazione dell’Associazione di cui fu primo Presidente l’Ing. Federico Martinoli. Da allora l’ATENA è sempre stata la principale protagonista nazionale nella promozione della cultura scientifica, tecnica e storica del mondo marittimo: i suoi Soci, sparsi su tutto il territorio italiano, sono i protagonisti e testimoni del progresso scientifico e tecnologico legato alla navigazione e, più in generale, al mondo del mare.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-Ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry
    www.RenewableUK.com Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry Issue 2: 2013 RUK13-019-02 2 Industry guidance aimed at jack-up owners operators, developers and contractors engaged in site-investigation, construction, operation and maintenance of offshore wind and marine energy installations. Acknowledgements RenewableUK acknowledges the time, effort, experience and expertise of all those who have contributed to this document. This Issue 2 of these guidelines was prepared for RenewableUK by London Offshore Consultants. This was in consultation with key consultees listed at the end of this document, RenewableUK members and key industry stakeholders. Status of this Document RenewableUK Health and Safety Guidelines are intended to provide information on particular technical, legal or policy issues relevant to the core membership base of RenewableUK. Their objective is to provide industry-specific guidance, for example where current information could be considered absent or incomplete. Health and Safety Guidelines are likely to be subject to review and updating, and so the latest version of the guidelines must be referred to. Attention is also drawn to the disclaimer below. Disclaimer The contents of these guidelines are intended for information and general guidance only, and do not constitute advice, are not exhaustive and do not indicate any specific course of action. Detailed professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from action in relation to any of the contents of this guide, or the relevance or applicability of the information herein. RenewableUK is not responsible for the content of external websites included in these guidelines and, where applicable, the inclusion of a link to an external website should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site’s owners (or its products/services).
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL Report 2O12
    ANNUAL REPORT 2O12 The sea ahead ANNUAL REPORT 2O12 GIUSEPPE BONO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF FINCANTIERI Dear Shareholders, The year 2012 was a challenging one for Fincantieri in the face of a complex global environment, marked by increased competitive pressure and continued market depression but with oppor- tunities of growing strategic importance in the area of high-value new generation ships. This trend is confirmed by the fact that the merchant shipping industry’s investments in new vessels amounted to approximately USD 100 billion, in line with the 2011 figure, while reporting a 20% decrease in compensated gross tonnage. Unfortunately, the level of orders is still insufficient to ensure proper utilization of worldwide production capacity, with consequent pressure on prices. Fincantieri faces a shipping industry that is cautious about investment and wary of depressing fleet profitability, already under pressure due to the growth in operating costs, primarily sparked by the growth in bunker fuel price. The absence of speculative behavior, at least, is helping acce- lerate the process of industry rebalancing, in readiness for a medium-term recovery in demand. In the military field, defense budget cuts, especially in Europe and the United States, are heighte- ning the strategic importance of export markets that more and more often are demanding the transfer of technology or local construction. With regard to Fincantieri’s sectors of operation, the cruise industry has once again demonstra- ted flexibility and responsiveness to the crisis. Analysts are forecasting 3.8% average annual growth in cruise passenger numbers, an estimate that nonetheless reflects very prudent as- sumptions about expected growth in the Asian tourist market.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS Highlights 2019 4 Letter from the CEO 8 Key Figures 2019 11 A Focused Portfolio 13 Board of Directors 41 Executive Management Team 45 Board of Directors’ Report 50 Reporting of Payments to Governments 71 The Board of Directors’ Report on Corporate Governance 73 Financial statements 83 3 · Aker BP Annual Report 2019 – HIGHLIGHTS 2019 I Q1 HIGHLIGHTS 2019 I Q2 14 JUNE – VALHALL QP TOPSIDE SAFELY REMOVED 19 MARCH - FIRST The original accommoda- OIL FROM ODA tion platform at Valhall (QP) First oil from the Spirit is safely removed by the 16 JANUARY – IVAR AASEN 7 APRIL – ULA DERRICK Energy-operated Oda giant vessel Pioneering OPERATED FROM ON- REMOVED field, some three Spirit. This is the rst of the SHORE CONTROL ROOM The derrick is removed from months ahead of plan. original structures at Valhall Aker BP becomes the first the Ula eld center using the to be removed as part of the copany on te Norean heavy lifting vessel Saipem modernization of the Valhall continental shelf to operate a 7000. The successful lifting eld center. manned platform from an operation is an important onshore control room. Ivar milestone in the upgrading Aaen n te Nort Sea and life extension of the Ula now operated from Aker BP’s area. Future drilling on the offices in Trondheim. eld will be carried out with modern jack-up rigs. AERBP NO BRENT BLEN US AERBP NO BRENT BLEN US 300 100 300 100 12 JUNE – BOND ISSUE OF USD 750 MILLION AT 4.75 % The size of the oering was increased from USD 500 million, indicated at launch on 10 June 2019, to USD 750 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation to the Financial Community First Half 2009 Results
    Presentation to the Financial Community First Half 2009 Results July 2009 Forward-Looking Statements Forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions and expectations that could ultimately prove inaccurate, as they are subject to risks and variables, outside the company’s control, that could cause actual results to differ materially, including currency fluctuations, the level of capital expenditure in the oil and gas industry as well as other industries, the timing of development of energy resources, construction and project risks, armed conflict or political instability in the Arabic Gulf or other regions, the strength of competition and interest rate fluctuations. 2 Presentation Outline ¾ First Half 2009 Financial Results ¾ Oil & Gas Industry Market Outlook – What’s Changed? ¾ Saipem’s Strategy for Current (Weak) Market ¾ Saipem Medium/ Long Term Strategy Focus on ‘Tough Trends’: ¾ 1. Hydrocarbons in Developing Countries Focus on Onshore ¾ 2. Deep/Ultra-Deep Water 2.a. Drilling 2.b. Field Development ¾ 3. Extreme Pipelines ¾ Conclusions 3 First Half 2009 Financial Results 4 Financials (Mln €) Revenues EBITDA EBIT Net Profit Adjusted 51585158 802802 46194619 % on 582 % on Revenues 582 Revenues 164164 (6.8%) 652652 % on % on 489489 138138 (5.7%) 24062406 Revenues Revenues 81 (30.1%) 154 (6.3%) 81 374374 24422442 154 131131 (5.4%) 3131 (11.5%) (51.0%) (30.3%) 146146 (35.0%) 6060 (16.7%) 100100 269269 3333 286286 123123 (51.7%) 198198 9191 (38.2%) 321 238238 (14.2%) 411 (18.7%) 313313 21972197 411 17411741 315315 (18.1%) 234234 (13.4%) 1H 2008 1H 2009 1H 2008 1H 2009 1H 2008 1H 2009 1H 2008 1H 2009 Saipem Group Business Units Offshore Offshore Drilling Onshore Onshore 5 Financials (Mln €) Capex Sources and Application of Funds, Net Debt & D/E Ratio 2044 60 D/E =0.87 2751 425425 1600 30 D/E = 0.74 110110 2032 796796 700700 979 880 1348 229229 239239 629 763763 760760 35 880880 594594 Net Debt Application Sources of Net Debt 1H 2008 2008 1H 2009 2009E* @ Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Seizing Opportunities
    Seizing opportunities Annual report and accounts 2003 Finland Norway Sweden Estonia Denmark Latvia UK Russia Ireland Lithuania Belgium Poland France Germany Kazakhstan Austria Georgia Italy USA Azerbaijan Portugal Turkey Algeria Iran China Saudi Arabia Abu Dhabi Mexico Venezuela Nigeria Singapore Angola Brazil Statoil is represented in 28 countries. Head office is in Stavanger. The Borealis petrochemicals group has production facilities in 11 countries and its head office is in Copenhagen. Borealis is owned 50 per cent by Statoil. Statoil 2003 Statoil is an integrated oil and gas company with substantial international activities. Represented in 28 countries, the group had 19 326 employees at the end of 2003. Nearly 40 per cent of these employees work outside Norway. Statoil is the leading producer on the Norwegian continental shelf and is operator for 20 oil and gas fields. The group’s international production is enjoying strong growth, and Statoil is a leading retailer of petrol and oil products in Scandinavia, Ireland, Poland and the Baltic states. One of the major suppliers of natural gas to the European market, Statoil is also one of the world’s biggest sellers of crude oil. As one of the world’s largest operators for offshore oil and gas activities, Statoil has been used to tackling major challenges with regard to safety and the environment from the very start. Today, we are one of the world’s most environmentally-efficient producers and transporters of oil and gas. Our goal is to generate good financial results for our shareholders through a sound and proactive business performance. It is our ambition to achieve good results across three bottom lines – financial, environmental and social – which strengthen each other in the long term and contribute to building a robust company.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I - Updated Estimate Of
    Part I - Updated Estimate of Fair Market Value of the S.S. Keewatin in September 2018 05 October 2018 Part I INDEX PART I S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE SEPTEMBER 2018 SCHEDULE A – UPDATED MUSEUM SHIPS SCHEDULE B – UPDATED COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES DESKTOP VALUATION CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE C – UPDATED VALUATION REPORT ON MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND RELATED ASSETS SCHEDULE D – LETTER FROM BELLEHOLME MANAGEMENT INC. PART II S.S. KEEWATIN – ESTIMATE OF FAIR MARKET VALUE NOVEMBER 2017 SCHEDULE 1 – SHIPS LAUNCHED IN 1907 SCHEDULE 2 – MUSEUM SHIPS APPENDIX 1 – JUSTIFICATION FOR OUTSTANDING SIGNIFICANCE & NATIONAL IMPORTANCE OF S.S. KEEWATIN 1907 APPENDIX 2 – THE NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC. REPORT OF INSPECTION APPENDIX 3 – COMPASS MARITIME SERVICES INDEPENDENT VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 4 – CULTURAL PERSONAL PROPERTY VALUATION REPORT APPENDIX 5 – BELLEHOME MANAGEMENT INC. 5 October 2018 The RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation 311 Talbot Street PO Box 189 Port McNicoll, ON L0K 1R0 Ladies & Gentlemen We are pleased to enclose an Updated Valuation Report, setting out, at September 2018, our Estimate of Fair Market Value of the Museum Ship S.S. Keewatin, which its owner, Skyline (Port McNicoll) Development Inc., intends to donate to the RJ and Diane Peterson Keewatin Foundation (the “Foundation”). It is prepared to accompany an application by the Foundation for the Canadian Cultural Property Export Review Board. This Updated Valuation Report, for the reasons set out in it, estimates the Fair Market Value of a proposed donation of the S.S. Keewatin to the Foundation at FORTY-EIGHT MILLION FOUR HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,475,000) and the effective date is the date of this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and Black Carbon in Arctic Shipping, 2015 to 2025
    Prevalence of heavy fuel oil and black carbon in Arctic shipping, 2015 to 2025 BRYAN COMER, NAYA OLMER, XIAOLI MAO, BISWAJOY ROY, DAN RUTHERFORD MAY 2017 www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank James J. Winebrake for his critical review and advice, along with our colleagues Joe Schultz, Jen Fela, and Fanta Kamakaté for their review and support. The authors would like to acknowledge exactEarth for providing satellite Automatic Identification System data and for data processing support. The authors sincerely thank the ClimateWorks Foundation for funding this study. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2017 International Council on Clean Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................1 1.1 Heavy fuel oil ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Black carbon .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Policy context ..................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • MWL Apr 2015 Draft 1__Marin
    MMaarriinneerrss WWEEAATTHHEERR LLOOGG Volume 59, Number 1 April 2015 From the Editor What a great issue this is! Along with our regular contributors, we have a couple of articles that I know you will really enjoy. One is from our PMO located in Miami Florida, David Dellinger. David sub- mitted an article on a strange phenomenon “fall streak holes”. I myself have never seen this particular type phenomenon nor did I know it existed. Rarely does it occur so far south in the Miami area, Mariners Weather Log so as you can imagine, Dave and emergency managers received quite ISSN 0025-3367 a few phone calls. Recently, (within the past couple of weeks) I was invited to a local art show by a friend. In this art show were such cre- U.S. Department of Commerce ations as water color, sculpture and fine photography. Well there it Dr. Kathryn D. Sullivan Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere & Acting was, among ravens and landscapes, a photograph of a “fall streak”. NOAA Administrator As luck would have it, because of my new found knowledge I was Acting Administrator able to discuss the photograph because of the article, thanks Dave! National Weather Service Dr. Louis Uccellini Another article I know you will thoroughly enjoy; Lafayette’s NOAA Assistant Administrator for Weather Services Hermione (her-my-oh-Knee) Voyage 2015. The article will not only Editorial Supervisor give you a history lesson, it describes the concept and effort of recon- Paula M. Rychtar structing an exact replica of General Lafayette 18th century ship called the Hermione.
    [Show full text]
  • Customs Bulletin Weekly, Vol. 53, December 11, 2019, No. 45
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection ◆ CUSTOMS BROKER USER FEE PAYMENT FOR 2020 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: General notice. SUMMARY: This document provides notice to customs brokers that the annual user fee that is assessed for each permit held by a broker, whether it may be an individual, partnership, association, or corpo- ration, is due by January 31, 2020. Pursuant to fee adjustments required by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST ACT) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations, the annual user fee payable for calendar year 2020 will be $147.89. DATES: Payment of the 2020 Customs Broker User Fee is due by January 31, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melba Hubbard, Broker Management Branch, Office of Trade, (202) 325–6986, or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Pursuant to section 111.96 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regu- lations (19 CFR 111.96(c)), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) assesses an annual user fee for each customs broker district and national permit held by an individual, partnership, association, or corporation. CBP regulations provide that this fee is payable for each calendar year in each broker district where the broker was issued a permit to do business by the due date. See 19 CFR 24.22(h) and (i)(9). Broker districts are defined in the General Notice entitled, ‘‘Geographic Boundaries of Customs Brokerage, Cartage and Light- erage Districts,’’ published in the Federal Register on March 15, 2000 (65 FR 14011), and corrected, with minor changes, on March 23, 2000 (65 FR 15686) and on April 6, 2000 (65 FR 18151).
    [Show full text]