DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Natural Gas Pipeline Easement at Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Natural Gas Pipeline Easement at Joint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Natural Gas Pipeline Easement at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey OCTOBER 2017 THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Environmental Assessment of Natural Gas Pipeline Easement Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Scope and Content of the Environmental Assessment ...................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Decision to be Made........................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.5 Agency and Public Participation ....................................................................................................... 1-2 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .................... 2-1 2.1 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Alternatives Considered ................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Alternative 1 – Grant Pipeline Easement to NJNG (Pinehurst Road to Ridgeway Road/Lakehurst Whitesville Road) ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.4 Alternative 2 – No Action Alternative ................................................................................................ 2-7 2.5 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Study ............................................................... 2-7 2.6 New Jersey Natural Gas SRL Project ............................................................................................... 2-8 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 General Overview............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases .................................................................................................. 3-4 3.4 Geology, Topography, and Soils ...................................................................................................... 3-7 3.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................ 3-9 3.6 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.7 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 3-24 3.8 Energy and Infrastructure .............................................................................................................. 3-26 3.9 Materials and Waste ...................................................................................................................... 3-27 3.10 Traffic and Noise ........................................................................................................................... 3-27 3.11 Socioeconomics ............................................................................................................................ 3-27 3.12 Health and Safety .......................................................................................................................... 3-28 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................ 4-1 4.1 General Overview............................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases .................................................................................................. 4-2 4.4 Geology, Topography, and Soils ...................................................................................................... 4-6 4.5 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................ 4-7 4.6 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................................... 4-9 4.7 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4-10 4.8 Energy and Infrastructure .............................................................................................................. 4-11 4.9 Materials and Wastes .................................................................................................................... 4-12 Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey October 2017 I Environmental Assessment of Natural Gas Pipeline Easement 4.10 Traffic and Noise ........................................................................................................................... 4-12 4.11 Socioeconomics ............................................................................................................................ 4-13 4.12 Health and Safety .......................................................................................................................... 4-13 4.13 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources ................................................................. 4-14 4.14 The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Human Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity ........................................................................................ 4-15 4.15 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts........................................................................................................ 4-15 5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Cumulative Impacts General Overview ............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Cumulative Impacts under Alternative 1 – Grant Pipeline Easement to NJNG .................................... 5-9 5.3 Cumulative Impacts under Alternative 2 (No Action Alternative) ...................................................... 5-15 5.4 Connected Actions ........................................................................................................................ 5-15 6 COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES AND CONCLUSIONS............................. 6-1 7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 7-1 8 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................................... 8-1 9 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING LETTERS MAILING LIST ............................................................... 9-1 10 PUBLIC DRAFT DISTRIBUTION LIST ............................................................ 10-1 APPENDIX A – Interagency and Intergovernmental Coordination for Environmental Planning and Public Involvement Materials ............................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B – Transmission Integrity Management Plan ...................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C – Threatened and Endangered Species Documentation .................................. C-1 APPENDIX D – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Correspondence ............................................. D-1 APPENDIX E – Cultural Resources Documentation ................................................................ E-1 APPENDIX F – Air Quality Calculations .................................................................................. F-1 APPENDIX G – Environmental Baseline Survey .................................................................... G-1 Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey October 2017 II Environmental Assessment of Natural Gas Pipeline Easement List of Figures Figure 1 Location of JB MDL Figure 2 Location of Proposed Easement for Alternative 1 Figure 3 Project Study Area Figure 4 Pinelands Management Areas Figure 5 Conservation Areas Figure 6 Physiographic Provinces Figure 7 Bedrock Geology Figure 8 Hydric Soils Figure 9 Acidic Soils Figure 10 Watershed Management Areas and New Jersey Water Quality Classifications Figure 11 Natural Features Figure 12 Threatened and Endangered Species Figure 13 Cultural Resources Figure 14 Connected Actions List of Tables Table 2-1 Proposed Pipeline Corridor Route ...................................................................... 2-2 Table 2-2 Alternatives Eliminated from Further Consideration ............................................ 2-8 Table 3-1 National and State Ambient Air Quality Standards .............................................. 3-4 Table 3-2 Geologic Formations within the Project Study Area ............................................ 3-7 Table 3-3 Soil
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cold War Infrastructure for Air Defense: the Fighter and Command Missions
    COLD WAR INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AIR DEFENSE: THE FIGHTER AND COMMAND MISSIONS Prepared for Headquarters, Air Combat Command Langley Air Force Base, Virginia November 1999 Table of Contents Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................v List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................vii Introduction......................................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1: Cold War Events and the Operational Infrastructure of the Air Force.....................................1 1946-1950......................................................................................................................................1 The Germans ..............................................................................................................................1 The Major Commands and First Generation Infrastructure .............................................................3 ADC and ANG........................................................................................................................4 SAC .......................................................................................................................................5 The 1950s.......................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • 46 AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SQ.Docx
    46th AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SQUADRON (BOMARC) LINEAGE Organized 1 JAN 1959 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron (BOMARC) STATIONS HURLBURT FIELD, FL McGuire AFB, NJ, 1 Jan 1959-31 Oct 1972 ASSIGNMENTS WEAPON SYSTEMS BOMARC COMMANDERS LTC Ernest B. Shepard, #1960 HONORS Service Streamers Campaign Streamers Armed Forces Expeditionary Streamers Decorations EMBLEM EMBLEM SIGNIFICANCE MOTTO NICKNAME OPERATIONS Organized on paper 1 January 1959, the 46th Air Defense Missile Squadron became a reality on 25 March 1959, when the Commanding Officer, Lt. Col. Ernest B. Shepard and other key personnel arrived at Hurlburt Field, Florida. The new squadron was composed of cross-trainees, factory trainees, retrainees, and a few other strains. The Unit Training Program, with the 4751st Air Defense Missile Squadron technicians acting as instructors, was established for a four months duration. The training program was divided into three phases. During the first phase, the new "Cadre" missilemen were indoctrinated in the Air Defense structure of which the Bomarc IM-99A Weapons System would become an integral part, and delved into the varied aspects of missile operations. Detailed explanation was given of the SAGE, (the controlling agency), Bomarc maintenance and supply concepts, health hazards, and ground safety. In the second phase, the men of the 46th entered into "Team Training" with their 4751st counterparts; working side by side to obtain specific job knowledge of the complex systems. The third and final phase unfolded when Major James C. Cuddington, 46th ADMS Executive Officer, received a Flag Order directing the 46th to accept, maintain, and process four Bomarc missiles into a firing configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • B-133102 Further Improvement Needed in Assisting Military
    . c i-. t?i - I y. Y 0 E-4 aI S t2D .- u S I I- in .-s v, .- LL s 2 Q a S Iz , COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548 B-l 33102 To the President of the Senate and the ..- Speaker of the House of Representatives We are reporting on the need for further improvement in assisting military personnel in finding adequate housing near bases to which they are assigned. We made our review pursuant to the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. 53), and the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 67). Copies of this report are being sent to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Secretary of Defense. Comptroller General of the United States Contents Page DIGEST 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 HRO functions 3 Joint or coordinated HROs 5 2 PROGRAMEFFECTIVENESS IMPAIRED 6 DOD apprised of the problem 8 Conclusions 8 3 NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTOF DOCUMENTATIONSUP- PORTING HRO REPORTING 10 Army 10 Fort Sam Houston 10 Fort Dix 10 Navy 11 Air Force Bases 11 Conclusions 11 Agency comments and GAO evaluation 12 4 INCIDENCE OF ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION IN COM- MUNITY HOUSING 13 Instances of unreported cases of alleged discrimination 13 Excessive time lapse before investiga- tion of cases at Fort Sam Houston 15 Conclusion 17 Agency comments and GAO evaluation 17 5 NEED FOR INCREASED EMPHASIS ON OBTAINING WRITTEN ASSURANCESOF OPEN HOUSING POLICY FROM LANDLORDSAND RELATED MATTERS 19 Need for updating assurances 19 Naval Air Station, Alameda 19 Naval Station, Treasure Island 20 CHAPTER Page Continued occupancy of sanctioned
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-ATA-Symbook-NEW.Pdf
    The symposium schedule is subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances. Please read all seminar room signs to make sure you are entering the seminar you want to attend. Every effort will be made to maintain the schedule as outlined. Thank you for your understanding. Distinguished Participants Hon Heather A. Wilson Secretary of the Air Force Gen David L. Goldfein Gen Darren W. McDew GEN Robert B. Abrams Chief of Staff of the Commander Commander United States Air Force U.S. Transportation Command U.S. Army Forces Command Gen Carlton D. Everhart II Gen James M. Holmes CMSAF Kaleth O. Wright Commander Commander Chief Master Sergeant Air Mobility Command Air Combat Command of the Air Force Lt Gen L. Scott Rice Lt Gen Maryanne Miller Director Commander Air National Guard Air Force Reserve Command and Chief Air Force Reserve 1 SEMINAR SYLLABUS Seminar 1 Title: MAF Rated Officer Development Presenters: Lt Col Roux, Maj Pallister, and Capt El-Amin This briefing is focused toward rated officer force development, but anyone is welcome as similar milestones and general principles of officer development will be discussed. The audience will be familiarized with the commander’s intent behind new policies, programs, and opportunities available to an officer at different points throughout their career. The briefing will touch on officer career progression, milestones and lessons learned with respect to promotion and development. Desired Learning Objectives: 1. Understand MAF force development continuum, intent and programs. 2. Understand recent initiatives. 3. Understand the supervisor and the member’s role in development. Seminar 2 Title: A Day Without AMC: AMC’s Strategic Deterrence and Power Projection Role Presenters: Col (R) Almind, Maj Chisholm, and Maj King Without AMC capabilities, the Air Force could not provide nuclear deterrence to the nation and allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 of This Article Will Describe the Thunderchief's
    On the cover: Two F-16C Fighting Falcons from the 177th Fighter Wing fly over MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey on Nov. 8, 2015 prior to the “Salute The Service” game between the NY Jets and the Jacksonville Jaguars. The ceremonies were opened by an enlistment of new troops in the end zone, followed by jumpers from the United States Military Academy- West Point Parachute Team and concluded with a giant 40 yard U.S. flag being unfurled by representatives from each branch of service for the singing of the National Anthem and the flyover. (Photo courtesy of John Iocono - Pro Football Hall of Fame) NOVEMBER 2015, VOL. 49 NO. 11 THE CONTRAIL STAFF 177TH FW COMMANDER COL . JOHN R. DiDONNA CHIEF, PUBLIC AFFAIRS CAPT. AMANDA BATIZ EDITOR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS SUPERINTENDENT MASTER SGT. ANDREW J. MOSELEY PHOTOJOURNALIST TECH. SGT. ANDREW J. MERLOCK PHOTOJOURNALIST SENIOR AIRMAN SHANE S. KARP PHOTOJOURNALIST SENIOR AIRMAN AMBER POWELL AVIATION HISTORIAN DR. RICHARD PORCELLI WWW.177FW.ANG.AF.MIL This funded newspaper is an authorized monthly publication for members of the U.S. Military Services. Contents of The Contrail are not necessarily the official view of, or endorsed by, the 177th Fighter Wing, the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense or the Depart- On desktop computers, click For back issues of The Contrail, ment of the Air Force. The editorial content is edited, prepared, and provided by the Public Affairs Office of the 177th Fighter Wing. All Ctrl+L for full screen. On mobile, and other multimedia products photographs are Air Force photographs unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 85-325-Feb
    72 ST AT. ] PUBLIC LAW 85-325-FEB. 12, 1958 11 Public Law 85-325 AN ACT February 12, 1958 To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to establish and develop certain [H. R. 9739] installations for'the national security, and to confer certain authority on the Secretary of Defense, and for other purposes. Be it enacted Ify the Senate and House of Representatives of the Air Force instal­ United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the Secretary lations. of the Air Force may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, converting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site prep­ aration, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following projects: Provided^ That with respect to the authorizations pertaining to the dispersal of the Strategic Air Command Forces, no authoriza­ tion for any individual location shall be utilized unless the Secretary of the Air Force or his designee has first obtained, from the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, approval of such location for dispersal purposes. SEMIAUTOMATIC GROUND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM (SAGE) Grand Forks Air Force Base, Grand Forks, North Dakota: Admin­ Post, p. 659. istrative facilities, $270,000. K. I. Sawyer Airport, Marquette, Michigan: Administrative facili­ ties, $277,000. Larson Air Force Base, Moses Lake, Washington: Utilities, $50,000. Luke Air Force Base, Phoenix, Arizona: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $11,582,000. Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls, Montana: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $6,901,000. Minot Air Force Base, Minot, North Dakota: Operational and training facilities, and utilities, $10,338,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighter Squadron Latches Into His Fighter Here Before a Night Training Mission at Atlantic City Air National Guard Base, N.J
    On the Cover: F-16’s from the 177th Fighter prepare for a night flying mission at Atlantic City Air National Guard Base, N.J., Jan. 9, 2015. ANG/Airman 1st Class Shane S. Karp JANUARY 2015, VOL. 49 NO. 1 THE CONTRAIL STAFF 177TH FW COMMANDER COL . KERRY M. GENTRY PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER 1ST LT. AMANDA BATIZ PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER MASTER SGT. ANDREW J. MOSELEY PHOTOJOURNALIST TECH. SGT. ANDREW J. MERLOCK PHOTOJOURNALIST AIRMAN 1st CLASS SHANE KARP PHOTOJOURNALIST AIRMAN 1st CLASS AMBER POWELL EDITOR/BROADCAST JOURNALIST TECH. SGT. MATT HECHT AVIATION HISTORIAN DR. RICHARD PORCELLI WWW.177FW.ANG.AF.MIL This funded newspaper is an authorized monthly publication for members of the U.S. Military Services. Contents of The Contrail are not On desktop computers, click For back issues of The Contrail, necessarily the official view of, or endorsed by, the 177th Fighter Wing, the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense or the Depart- Ctrl+L for full screen. On mobile, and other multimedia products ment of the Air Force. The editorial content is edited, prepared, and provided by the Public Affairs Office of the 177th Fighter Wing. All tablet, or touch screen device, from the 177th Fighter Wing, photographs are Air Force photographs unless otherwise indicated. tap or swipe to flip the page. please visit us at DVIDS! Story by Airman 1st Class Shane S. Karp, 177th FW/PA Unit members complete 48-hour exercise irmen from the 177th Fighter Wing participated in a 48-hour exercise A here entitled JAN ME EX 15-01 which demonstrated the base’s readiness to deploy.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace World
    Aerospace World By Suzann Chapman, Managing Editor USAF Presses On With B-1B Cuts Last summer’s controversial pro- posal by the Air Force to reduce its B-1B fleet by one-third and consoli- date the remaining B-1Bs at just two bases will take effect this year, ac- cording to a report USAF officials provided to Congress. USAF plans to reduce its combat- coded bomber fleet to fewer than 100 USAF photo by SSgt. Krista M. Foeller aircraft. The move, the service said, “incurs some risk.” Air Force officials insist, however, that any risk “will be mitigated by mod- ernizing the remaining B-1 aircraft.” Service officials wanted to make the B-1 cuts last year, but that plan was thwarted by a Senate budget amendment that prohibited using 2001 funds for that purpose. The B-1 fleet was running $2 bil- lion behind in modernization funding across the Future Years Defense USAF plans to cut the B-1B bomber fleet by one-third this year. Overall, the Program. By trimming the fleet, USAF service said it will take the long-range strategic bomber force—B-1Bs, B-2s, said, “Our new long-range strike force and B-52s—down to fewer than 100 aircraft. will be more effective, survivable, and supportable.” these changes. The service said it Of that, $14 billion will go to DOD According to the report, USAF plans would provide additional funds to bring and the Intelligence Community, as to make changes to the current total the total for B-1 reinvestment across follows: fleet of 207 bombers throughout 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • GUARDLIFEGUARDLIFE GUARDLIFE Vol
    THETHE MAGAZINEMAGAZINE OFOF THETHE NEWNEW JERSEYJERSEY NATIONALNATIONAL GUARDGUARD Vol.Vol. 2929 No.No. 33 GUARDLIFEGUARDLIFE GUARDLIFE Vol. 29, NO. 3 Index GUARDLIFE STAFF Editors Story on Pages 108th Garners Top Awards Page 3 Lt. Col. Roberta Niedt 6 and 7 Conversation With The TAG Pages 4-5 Maj. Denise Waggoner 2nd Lt. Luz Aponte` Assistant Editor-Production Military Review Pages 6-7 Tech. Sgt. Mark C. Olsen Staff Photographers Cunniff Assumes Command Of 108th Page 8 Members of the 253rd Transportation Company Staff Writers Pistol Team Competition Page 9 Roman Martyniuk Staff Sgt. Barbara Harbison Story on Page 15 "Kicking It Up A Notch" Page 10 GUARDLIFE is a product of the NJDMAVA Public Affairs Office, the Brig. Gen. Wondrack Retires Page 11 444th Mobile Public Affairs Detach- ment, the 177th Fighter Wing and the 108th Air Refueling Wing Public Af- Mobilzation Page Page 12 fairs Offices. GUARDLIFE is pub- lished under provisions of AR 360-81 and AFI 190-7. Opinions expressed News Guard Families Can Use Page 13 in GUARDLIFE are not to be consid- ered the official view of this head- Cavalry Participates In Freedom Ride Page 14 quarters, or the Department of the Army or Air Force. GUARDLIFE is printed via the photo offset process. Air Show Success Page 15 Letters may be sent to: GUARDLIFE, Public Affairs Office, P.O. Box 340, NJDMAVA, Trenton, NJ, 08625-0340. Short Rounds Pages 16-18 E-mail at:mark.olsen@njdmava. state.nj.us Army And Air Enlisted Promotions Page 19 About The Cover Convoy Duty Last Round: 177th Receives AFOUA Page 20 Sgt.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 15780.Pdf
    FOREWARD Your Air Force Reserve is a combat- ready force, composed of more than 70,000 proud reservists, stationed locally throughout the United States, serving globally for every Combatant Command around the world. We provide our Nation with operational capability, strategic depth and surge capacity whenever America needs us. We are an integrated Total Force partner in every Air Force core mission: Air and Space Superiority, Global Strike, Rapid Global Mobility, Intelligence, Surveillance, James F. Jackson, and Reconnaissance, and Command Lt Gen, USAF and Control. In an increasingly limited fiscal environment, reservists remain efficient and cost-effective solutions to our nation’s challenges. The majority of our Citizen Airmen serve part time, making us a highly efficient force, averaging about a third of the cost of active duty Airmen. Perhaps our greatest strength is we retain ‘Airmen for life,’ preserving the considerable investments and expertise of our Airmen beyond their Cameron B. Kirksey, active duty service. In times of crisis, we Command CMSgt can call upon our strategic depth of an additional 785,000 Airmen from the Individual Ready Reserve, Standby Reserve, Retired Reserve and Retired Active Duty. To meet future challenges, the Air Force Reserve works as a member of the “Total Force”, alongside active duty and Air National Guardsmen. This strong, three-component team is ready for combat or humanitarian relief operations worldwide. Since 2012, the Air Force Reserve can also be mobilized to respond to domestic requirements here at home. 01 Dual-use capabilities such as airlift, aeromedical evacuation and personnel recovery are equally valuable, both in-theater and for homeland support.
    [Show full text]
  • 166 Public Law 86-500-.June 8, 1960 [74 Stat
    166 PUBLIC LAW 86-500-.JUNE 8, 1960 [74 STAT. Public Law 86-500 June 8. 1960 AN ACT [H» R. 10777] To authorize certain construction at military installation!^, and for other pnriwses. He it enacted hy the Hemite and House of Representatives of the 8tfiction^'Acf°^ I'raited States of America in Congress assemoJed, I960. TITLE I ''^^^* SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con- \'erting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equip­ ment, for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES I'ECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Training facilities, medical facilities, and utilities, $6,221,000. Benicia Arsenal, California: Utilities, $337,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Utilities and ground improvements, $353,000. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey: Research, development, and test facilities, $850,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, Colorado: Operational facilities, $369,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Community facilities and utilities, $1,000,000. Umatilla Ordnance Depot, Oregon: Utilities and ground improve­ ments, $319,000. Watertow^n Arsenal, Massachusetts: Research, development, and test facilities, $1,849,000. White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico: Operational facilities and utilities, $1,2'33,000. (Quartermaster Corps) Fort Lee, Virginia: Administrative facilities and utilities, $577,000. Atlanta General Depot, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, $365,000. New Cumberland General Depot, Pennsylvania: Operational facili­ ties, $89,000. Richmond Quartermaster Depot, Virginia: Administrative facili­ ties, $478,000. Sharpe General Depot, California: Maintenance facilities, $218,000. (Chemical Corps) Army Chemical Center, Maryland: Operational facilities and com­ munity facilities, $843,000.
    [Show full text]