DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Initiative Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Initiative Programme Community Initiative Programme 18-09-2001 Interreg IIIB North Sea Region Community Initiative concerning trans-European co-operation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced sustainable development of the European territory * NUTS 3 List of Responsible Ministries in Each Country ........................................................................ iii Preface ......................................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Transnational Development Context of the North Sea Region........................................ 1 1.2 Consultation Process ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 The Use of Indicative Commission Guidance ........................................................................ 4 1.4 Central Aims of the Community Initiative Programme............................................................ 4 1.5 Consistency with Community Policies ................................................................................... 6 1.6 Complementarity with Community Programmes.................................................................... 8 1.7 Key Characteristics of the North Sea Region ........................................................................ 9 1.8 Key Lessons Learnt from Interreg IIC North Sea Programme................................................ 9 1.9 NORVISION – A Spatial Perspective for the North Sea Region .......................................... 10 Chapter 2: Analysis of the North Sea Region ........................................................................... 13 2.1 Delimitation of the Eligible Area........................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Demography and Settlement Structure ......................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Economy and Labour Market........................................................................................ 15 2.1.3 Present Economic Situation.......................................................................................... 16 2.2 Spatial Situation and Trends ............................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 The Urban System........................................................................................................ 20 2.2.2 Rural Areas................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.3 Maritime Areas ............................................................................................................. 22 2.2.4 Transport and the Information Society .......................................................................... 22 2.2.5 Natural Resources and Cultural Heritage...................................................................... 26 2.3 The SWOT Analysis............................................................................................................ 31 Chapter 3: The Joint Transnational Strategy............................................................................ 39 3.1 Rationale............................................................................................................................. 39 3.2 The Mission of the North Sea Programme........................................................................... 39 3.3 North Sea Region IIIB Programme Strategy........................................................................ 40 3.4 The Key Strategic Issues .................................................................................................... 40 Chapter 4: Priorities and Measures........................................................................................... 44 4.0 Targets at Programme Level. .............................................................................................. 44 4.1 PRIORITY 1 ........................................................................................................................ 45 Transnational Spatial Development Strategies and Actions for Urban, Rural and Maritime Systems in the North Sea Region.......................................................................................... 45 4.2 PRIORITY 2 ........................................................................................................................ 51 Efficient and Sustainable Transport and Communications and Improved Access to the Information Society................................................................................................................ 51 4.3 PRIORITY 3 ........................................................................................................................ 58 Sustainable Management and Development of the Environment, Natural Resources and Cultural Heritage.................................................................................................................... 58 4.4 PRIORITY 4 ........................................................................................................................ 63 Water Management ............................................................................................................... 63 4.5 PRIORITY 5 ........................................................................................................................ 67 Technical Assistance ............................................................................................................. 67 Chapter 5: Summary of the Ex-ante Evaluation written by Nordregio .................................... 68 5.1 Strengths, Weaknesses and Potential of the Area............................................................... 68 5.2 Appraisal of Added Value of Interventions........................................................................... 69 5.3 Appraisal of Implementation Procedures............................................................................. 71 5.4 Appraisal of the Consistency of the Programme.................................................................. 71 5.5 The status of the North Sea Environment, and Expected Impacts of the North Sea region Programme ............................................................................................................................... 72 Chapter 6: Indicators.................................................................................................................. 75 6.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 75 i 6.1 Project Indicators ................................................................................................................ 75 6.1.1 Indicators Related to Project Delivery ........................................................................... 75 6.1.2 Indicators Related to the Aims and Objectives of the Projects ...................................... 76 6.1.3 Qualitative Reporting Requirements ............................................................................. 78 6.2 Programme Indicators ......................................................................................................... 78 6.2.1 Context Indicators for IIIB Programmes ........................................................................ 78 6.2.2 Other Programme Indicators......................................................................................... 79 Chapter 7: Administration and Financial Implementation ....................................................... 80 7.0 Administration and Implementation Arrangements .............................................................. 80 7.1 The Programme Administrative Structure ........................................................................... 82 7.1.1 Monitoring Committee................................................................................................... 82 7.1.2 Steering Committee ...................................................................................................... 83 7.2 Management and Financial Administration.......................................................................... 84 7.2.1 The Managing Authority................................................................................................ 84 7.2.2 The Paying Authority .................................................................................................... 85 7.2.3 The National Authorities................................................................................................ 86 7.2.4 Joint Technical Secretariat............................................................................................ 86 7.3 Financial Management ........................................................................................................ 87 7.3.1 Financial Management of Projects ................................................................................ 87 7.3.2 Financial Management of the Programme .................................................................... 89 7.4 Financial Control and Audit ................................................................................................. 89 7.5 Grant Rates........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Heritage 32 COM
    World Heritage 32 COM Distribution Limited WHC-08/32.COM/8B.Add Paris, 25 June 2008 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty second Session Quebec City, Canada 2 – 10 July 2008 Item 8B of the Provisional Agenda: Nominations to the World Heritage List Nominations to the World Heritage List SUMMARY This Addendum presents the Draft Decisions concerning 5 nominations of properties deferred or referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee, 21 minor modifications to the boundaries and 29 revisions of Statements of Significance or Statements of Outstanding Universal Value of already inscribed properties and 1 change of criteria to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session in 2008. Decision required: The Committee is requested to examine the Draft Decisions presented in this Addendum and take its Decisions in accordance with paragraphs 153, 155, 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines. I. Changes to criteria of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List The World Heritage Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006) approved 17 changes of criteria numbering for Natural and Mixed properties inscribed for geological values before 1994 (Document WHC- 06/30.COM/8D). For only two properties (see table below), in the group of properties that was inscribed under natural criteria (ii) before 1994, was no change in criteria numbering requested at that time, as the State Party asked for further time to consult the stakeholders concerned. Following consultations with the stakeholders and IUCN, it was agreed that the criteria should be as shown in the table here below.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal
    Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal World Heritage Site Management Plan Progress Report July 2019 Welcome Our World Heritage Site Along with our focus on delivering Management Plan is now in conservation projects in the World Heritage its fourth year and this progress Site we’ve been developing a set of draft attributes of the Outstanding Universal report celebrates the work Value of the World Heritage Site to help of the National Trust and our manage and protect the site. We are also partners over the last year. delighted to see progress on the Ripon Neighbourhood Plan and Harrogate District In September 2018 we had the great Local Plan, both of which include policies news that our first round bid to the to protect the World Heritage Site and National Lottery Heritage Fund for the its setting. Skell Valley Project had been successful. We worked closely with Nidderdale Area Infrastructure continues to be a major of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) challenge. Our car parks, ticket offices, and communities living and working along toilets and café areas have been struggling the river to develop a range of projects to to cope with the growing number of visitors. manage flood risk, improve water quality Following the refurbishment of the visitor and habitats for wildlife and restore centre this year our big focus for 2019/20 neglected historic buildings and landscapes. is the Studley Lake entrance. The project will also extend links between Ripon and the communities upstream to We couldn’t deliver any of this without improve access and explore the stories the support of our partners, local which have shaped the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal
    Admission prices Open all year, a visit can last Current prices are as follows. Fountains Abbey from a few hours to a full 1-13 in group Standard rate applies day... 14+ in group £15.20 adult, £7.60 child & Studley Royal Prices are reviewed annually and may have Explore the dramatic Fountains Abbey, the changed by the date of your visit. most complete ruins of a Cistercian abbey Group Visits in Britain. Group rates are only available when the group organiser checks in and pays at the admission Enjoy a great day out together Wander around the eighteenth century point for the whole group on arrival. at this World Heritage Site water garden with its elegant ornamental lakes, tumbling cascades and temples. Spend a full day exploring Discover Fountains Mill, one of the finest moments in history sitting side surviving examples of a monastic water mill by side at this World Heritage in Britain. Site Enjoy the sight of over 300 wild deer Making a booking in the medieval park at Studley Royal. All group visits need to be pre-booked to Admire the Elizabethan-style facade of receive group rates. Fountains Hall, with paths to the orchard and hidden herb garden. Please contact (during office hours): Annette Tulip, Bookings & Functions Coordinator Visit St Mary’s Church, an outstanding Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal example of Victorian gothic architecture Ripon HG4 3DY m hn ?l n t m hl c q s h‘ ‘ k ß o ? ß ? v k n designed by William Burges. ‘ h q c k c m ? g n d l q ? h d s‘ hm f n d?ß?o‘sqhl United Nations Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey Cultural Organization inscribed on the World Learn more about the estate with a 01765 643197 Heritage List in 1986 Photography © National Trust Images.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / Icomos Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 27-30 October 20
    REPORT ON THE JOINT WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE / ICOMOS ADVISORY MISSION TO STONEHENGE, AVEBURY AND ASSOCIATED SITES Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 27-30 OCTOBER 2015 Chris Barker, Civil Engineer, ICOMOS Nathan Schlanger, Archaeologist, ICOMOS Marie-Noël Tournoux, Project Officer Europe and North America Unit, World Heritage Centre Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………………………….…… 4 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..… 5 2 MISSION REPORT ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 3 MISSION CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………. 24 4 MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………...…...... 24 5 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………... 28 6 ANNEXES…………....……………………………………………………………………... 29 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The joint World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS mission thanks the State Party for the arrangements for the Advisory Mission and the preparation of all the necessary relevant materials, together with the good will in its advancement. Particular thanks are due to DCMS and Historic England and more specifically to Keith Nichol and Hannah Jones from DCMS and Henry Owen-John and Phil McMahon from Historic England, our main focal points. The mission would like to acknowledge and to commend the investment and professionalism of our hosts in addition to logistics and hospitality. The assistance gladly provided by Historic England, English Heritage Trust, the National Trust, and their representatives, be it at organizational level or on the ground, including notably Chris Smith, Historic England, and Heather Sebire, Properties Curator West English Heritage Trust, Kate Davies, Stonehenge General Manager, English Heritage Trust, Beth Thomas & Sarah Simmonds, World Heritage site Coordinator, Nicola Snashall, National Trust WHS archaeologist for Stonehenge & Avebury, Cassandra Genn, Senior project and Stakeholder Manager, Ian Wilson, Assistant Director of Operations, Ingrid Samuel, Historic Environment Director, Janet Tomlin, National Trust, as well as the Wiltshire Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillips 2012 Adaptive
    RADAR Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Note if anything has been removed from thesis. Removed p79, Fig 11, p134 - Fig 27, p308 - Appendix 12, p309-331 (published papers) When referring to this work, the full bibliographic details must be given as follows: Phillips,H (2013)The adaptive capacity of the management of cultural heritage sites to climate change. PhD thesis. Oxford Brookes University. WWW.BROOKES.AC.UK/GO/RADAR The Adaptive Capacity of the Management of Cultural Heritage Sites to Climate Change Helen Francine Phillips Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Oxford Brookes University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: 6th June 2013 i ABSTRACT Despite the growing body of research on the concept of adaptive capacity, there is an absence of research which investigates adaptive capacity in the field of cultural heritage management. Climatic changes have potentially serious implications for the historic environment, which is itself a non-renewable resource. Cultural heritage sites can be particularly sensitive to severe weather events and to changes in climate, both due to direct impacts on built structures, archaeology and designed landscapes, but also due to changes in visitor behaviour and the potentially adverse implications of adaptive measures on heritage significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM
    Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM Distribution limitée WHC-99/CONF.209/10 Paris, le 5 octobre 1999 Original : anglais / français ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Vingt-troisième session Marrakech, Maroc 29 novembre – 4 décembre 1999 Point 8 de l’ordre du jour provisoire : Informations sur les listes indicatives et examen de propositions d’inscription de biens culturels et naturels sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril et la Liste du patrimoine mondial RESUME 1. A sa dix-septième session à Carthagène, en décembre 1993, le Comité a exprimé sa préoccupation quant au petit nombre de listes indicatives qui répondaient aux exigences stipulées aux paragraphes 7 et 8 des Orientations, et il a confirmé l'importance de ces listes pour la planification, l'analyse comparative des propositions d'inscription et la réalisation des études globales et thématiques. Ces listes constituent en outre un inventaire des biens situés sur le territoire de chaque Etat partie que ce dernier considère comme susceptibles d'être inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial. Le Comité a également confirmé que les listes indicatives sont obligatoires pour les biens culturels pour lesquels les Etats parties ont l'intention de soumettre des propositions d'inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial dans les cinq à dix prochaines années. 2. En conséquence, le Comité a invité les Etats parties qui ne l'avaient pas encore fait, à soumettre leurs listes indicatives conformément aux Orientations, étant entendu qu’ "une assistance préparatoire sera fournie si nécessaire et à la demande de l'Etat partie concerné".
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey
    Fountains Abbey From Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountains_Abbey (19.05.2008) Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey* UNESCO World Heritage Site View of Fountains Abbey looking from east to south. Fountains Abbey in North Yorkshire, England, is a ruined Cistercian monastery, founded in 1132. Fountains Abbey is one of the largest and best preserved Cistercian houses in England. It is a Grade I listed building and owned by the National Trust. Along with the adjacent Studley Royal Water Garden, it is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. History Fountains Abbey was founded in 1132 following a dispute and riot at St. Mary's Abbey in York. Following the riot, thirteen monks were exiled and after unsuccessfully attempting to return to the early 6th century Rule of St Benedict, were taken into the protection of Thurstan, Archbishop of York. He provided them with a site in the valley of the River Skell. The enclosed valley had all the required materials for the creation of a monastery, providing shelter from the weather, stone and timber for building, and a running supply of water.[1]. The monks applied to join the Cistercian order in AD1132. The abbey operated until 1539, when Henry VIII ordered the Dissolution of the Monasteries. The Abbey buildings and over 500 acres (2 km²) of land were then sold by the Crown, on October 1, 1540 [1], to Sir Richard Gresham, the London merchant, father of the founder of the Royal Exchange, Sir Thomas Gresham.[2] Architecture Interior looking down the Nave Construction of the Abbey began in 1132, with rock quarried locally, although the original monastery buildings received considerable additions and alterations in the later period of the order, causing deviations from the strict Cistercian type.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost-Loss Analysis and Probabilistic Information for Water Boards
    Cost-Loss analysis and probabilistic information for water boards Laura Janssen KNMI Internal Report IR-2015-03 Master Thesis Mathematics Cost-Loss analysis and probabilistic information for water boards Author: Supervisor Radboud University: Laura Janssen Prof. Dr. Ir. Egbert-Jan Sol [email protected] [email protected] Supervisors KNMI: Drs. Kees Kok [email protected] Dr. Maurice Schmeits [email protected] Second reader: Dr. Heleen de Coninck [email protected] July 7, 2015 Abstract The water board Wetterskip Frysl^anin the province Friesland is responsible for managing the water level in the Frisian belt canal system. When the expected water level there, calculated by among others the expected precipitation, is too high, the water board intervenes by opening sluices and operating pumps. To know the expected water level in the Frisian belt canal system, the precipitation forecast must be as accurate as possible. Expected precipitation based on probabilistic information takes uncertainty into account, in contrast to the use of deterministic information, which may lead to better decisions also for the short term, forecasts up to two days ahead. To investigate that, a strategy for a simplified model of the water board is constructed to give a suggestion at which hours sluices may need to be opened and a pump may need to operate if the water level reaches a certain threshold. The input of the strategy consists of precipitation data in Friesland from winters of 2012 to 2015. This thesis compares the output based on probabilistic information, which differs for different water level thresholds, with the output based on deterministic information.
    [Show full text]
  • EXMIQ052 National Trust Appendix 1
    Proposal for a Buffer Zone for the World Heritage Site of Studley Royal Park including the ruins of Fountains Abbey Submission to the World Heritage Centre February 2012 Studley Royal, including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey, Buffer Zone submission Dec 2011 1 PROPOSAL FOR A BUFFER ZONE FOR THE WORLD HERITAGE SITE OF STUDLEY ROYAL PARK INCLUDING THE RUINS OF FOUNTAINS ABBEY - SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE FEBRUARY 2012 Prepared by the National Trust and English Heritage December 2011 Introduction Although the area within the boundary of the World Heritage Site is unlikely to be subject to development proposals which adversely impact upon its outstanding universal value (due to the fact that it is wholly managed by the National Trust), outside the designated World Heritage Site there are a number of developments which could, potentially, threaten its outstanding universal value. For example large scale or poorly sited renewable energy schemes, large-scale agricultural developments, and inappropriately sited buildings could harm its setting or key views into and out of the designated area. Since 2001 there has been a proposal in the Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal World Heritage Site Management Plan to establish a buffer zone for Studley Royal Park including the ruins of Fountains Abbey World Heritage Site. The requirement for a buffer zone was again raised in the Periodic Monitoring Report 2006. The Periodic Monitoring Report stated that the boundaries of the site were inadequate and there was a need to define a formal buffer zone. It stated ‘Although the World Heritage Site boundary covers the core area of the designed landscape, some significant features lie outside.
    [Show full text]
  • C16 Doc-16-Unesco
    UNESCO The World Heritage THE AMERICAS ANTIGUA and BARBUDA 1983 Los Glaciares ARGENTINA 1978 Iguazu National Park ARGENTINA and BRAZIL Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis BELIZE 1990 Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System City of Potosi BOLIVIA 1976 Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos Historic City of Sucre Historic Town of Ouro Preto Historic Centre of the Town of Olinda Historic Centre of Salvador de Bahia Sanctuary of Bom Jesus do Congonhas BRAZIL 1977 Iguacu National Park Brasilia Serra de Capivara National Park Historic Centre of Sao Luis L’ Anse aux Meadows National Historic Park Nahanni National Park Dinosaur Provincial Park Anthony Island Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump Complex CANADA 1976 Wood Buffalo National Park Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks Quebec (Historic area) Gros Morne National Lunenburg Old Town Tatshenshini-Alsek, Kluane, Wrangell- St. Elias CANADA and UNITED STATES OF and Glacier Bay Parks AMERICA Waterton Glacier International Peace Park CHILE 1980 Rapa Nui National Park Carthagena Los Katios National Park COLOMBIA 1983 Historic Centre of Santa Cruz de Mompox National Archaeological Park of Tierradentro San Agustin Archaeological Park COSTA RICA 1977 Cocos Island National Park COSTA RICA and PANAMA Talamanca-La Amistad Old Havana CUBA 1981 Trinidad and the Valley de los Ingenios San Pedro de la Roca Castle, Santiago de Cuba DOMINICA 1985 Morne Trois Pitons National Park DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1985 Colonial City of Santo Domingo Galapagos Islands ECUADOR 1975 City of Quito Sangay National
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 30-09-2021 Appendix 1 List of interviewed organisations Pilot studies Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Was Prepared As Part of the Activities Described in the Approved
    This work was prepared as part of the activities described in the approved European program Erasmus+ School Key Action 2—Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices- Strategic Partnerships for school education Name of the project: UNESCO Heritage, 2014-2016 Code: 2014-1-RO01- KA201-002437_6. The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. This project is funded by the European Union Summary I. LEARNING AND TEACHING FOR FUTURE BY PAST AND PRESENT I.1. A new curriculum, the birth of the area related to History and Local Heritage-Portuguese experience..1 I.2. European Identity and the emergence of Europe and the European civilization ……………………….5 I.3. The Need of World Heritage Education………………………………………………………………..10 I.4. Integration of Word Heritage Education into curricular aproch………………………………………..11 I.5. Reasons for a curriculum proposal………………………………………………………………….….16 I.6. General Competencies……………………………………………….…………………………………18 I.7. Values and attitudes…………………………………………………………………………………….18. I.8. Specific competences and content……………………………………………………………………...20 I.9.Standard performances………………………………………………….………………………………30. II. METHOLOGICAL SUGESTIONS ......................................................................................................32 ANNEXES: Annex 1: Bread in various cultures, an essential constituent of European everyday life…………….……38 Annex 2: Widely used given European common names………………………………………………..….49 Annex 3: The principles of democracy…………………………………………………………….……….58 Annex 4: The €20…………………………………………………………………………………….……..60 Annex 5: European countries-database…………………………………………….…………………….....62 ‘We are not bringing together states, we are uniting people’ Jean Monnet, 1952 EUROPEAN IDENTITY-A PART OF WORLD HERITAGE I.
    [Show full text]