DOCSLIB.ORG

Phillips 2012 Adaptive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phillips 2012 Adaptive RADAR Research Archive and Digital Asset Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Note if anything has been removed from thesis. Removed p79, Fig 11, p134 - Fig 27, p308 - Appendix 12, p309-331 (published papers) When referring to this work, the full bibliographic details must be given as follows: Phillips,H (2013)The adaptive capacity of the management of cultural heritage sites to climate change. PhD thesis. Oxford Brookes University. WWW.BROOKES.AC.UK/GO/RADAR The Adaptive Capacity of the Management of Cultural Heritage Sites to Climate Change Helen Francine Phillips Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Oxford Brookes University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: 6th June 2013 i ABSTRACT Despite the growing body of research on the concept of adaptive capacity, there is an absence of research which investigates adaptive capacity in the field of cultural heritage management. Climatic changes have potentially serious implications for the historic environment, which is itself a non-renewable resource. Cultural heritage sites can be particularly sensitive to severe weather events and to changes in climate, both due to direct impacts on built structures, archaeology and designed landscapes, but also due to changes in visitor behaviour and the potentially adverse implications of adaptive measures on heritage significance. This research investigated the adaptive capacity of the management of cultural heritage sites in the UK, through the assessment of adaptive capacity at selected case study sites. A questionnaire survey of all UK WHS sites, a review of plans and policy, and interviews with key stakeholders at a national level also contribute to the study. An in-depth qualitative analysis of three UK World Heritage Sites was undertaken, which were Ironbridge Gorge, Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal and Blenheim Palace. Fieldwork included site visits, interviews with stakeholders involved in site management such as property managers, conservators and local authority officers, and a thorough documentary review. A conceptual framework of adaptive capacity relevant for heritage management has been developed, which can be used as a tool for analysis, in order to highlight strengths and weaknesses in capacity. The key determinants of adaptive capacity in the framework, identified through the research, are cognitive factors, leadership, learning capacity, access to information, authority and resources. The research makes a contribution to adaptive capacity theory, with adaptive capacity theory being found to be applicable to heritage management, but with certain limitations. Areas of weakness and strengths in adaptive capacity at the case study sites and in wider World Heritage management planning have been identified, and practical recommendations are presented. The study found that whilst progress is being made within the heritage sector on adaptation, there are significant challenges and areas where capacity could be enhanced. Notably, there is a lack of information on best practice and guidance on adaptation within a heritage context. Tools for futures thinking such as climate change scenarios are not being ii widely used in management planning, and concerns about the uncertainties associated with climate data are prevalent. Although clear top down guidance is needed to provide drivers and a framework for action, this needs to be balanced with local flexibility, in order to allow locally appropriate and sensitive decision making to protect significance. There is also a need for further collaboration and dialogue between different sectors, with sustained cooperation required to combine the approaches and requirements of those from different fields e.g. the integration of heritage concerns into the work of emergency planners. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors Mrs Elizabeth Wilson and Dr Aylin Orbasli for their encouragement, valuable feedback and morale boosting sessions, for which I am truly grateful. I would like to sincerely thank Oxford Brookes University for providing financial sponsorship through the Urban Futures Studentship without which this research would not have been possible. A special thank you goes to all the interviewees and participants of this research, many of whom were extremely generous with their time and knowledge. Thanks to my colleagues and friends particularly existing and past members of planning, architecture, urban design and real estate. I could not have asked for a more supportive group of colleagues and their camaraderie, ideas and humour contributed to making the last few years really enjoyable ones! In particular thanks to (alphabetically) Afua, Alex, Aliye, Arthur, Celia, Gisele, Julia, Makbule, Maria, Matt, Nicole, Sharul, Sofia, Sue, Veronika and Victoria. For their enduring friendship - Annie, Catherine, Emma, Philippa and Sonia. This thesis is dedicated to my parents for their continuing faith in me, generosity and encouragement. Finally, my profound gratitude to Dan, whose support, boundless energy, optimism and humour keeps me smiling. iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 THESIS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 21 1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 21 1.2. Research Aim and Objectives .................................................................................. 22 1.3. Summary of Methodology ....................................................................................... 23 1.4. Structure of the Thesis ............................................................................................ 24 CHAPTER 2 THE ADAPTATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE TO CLIMATE CHANGE ..................... 26 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 26 2.2. An Introduction to Cultural Heritage ....................................................................... 26 2.2.1. Key Concepts ................................................................................................... 26 2.2.2. Heritage Management .................................................................................... 28 2.2.3. Heritage at Risk ................................................................................................ 31 2.3. Climate Change ........................................................................................................ 32 2.3.1. Definitions of Climate Change ......................................................................... 32 2.3.2. Observed Climate Change ............................................................................... 32 2.3.3. Future Climate Change and the Need for Adaptation ..................................... 34 2.3.4. Planning for an Uncertain Future: Climate Change Scenarios ........................ 35 2.4. The Impacts of Climate Change on Cultural Heritage ............................................. 38 2.4.1. Research on Impacts........................................................................................ 38 2.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 47 CHAPTER 3 VULNERABILITY, ADAPTIVE CAPACITY AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ....................... 49 3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 49 3.2. Vulnerability ............................................................................................................ 49 3.2.1. Conceptualising Vulnerability .......................................................................... 49 3.2.2. Measuring Vulnerability .................................................................................. 51 3.3. Adaptive Capacity .................................................................................................... 51 3.3.1. Defining Adaptive Capacity ............................................................................. 51 v 3.3.2. Institutions and Adaptive Capacity .................................................................. 53 3.3.3. Assessing/Measuring Adaptive Capacity ......................................................... 54 3.3.4. Top Down/Bottom Up Assessments of Adaptive Capacity ............................. 56 3.3.5. Determinants of Adaptive Capacity ................................................................. 58 3.4. Previous Research on Adaptive Capacity and Cultural Heritage ............................. 60 3.4.1. Conceptual Frameworks of Adaptive Capacity ................................................ 61 3.5. Selection of Key Determinants for the Research .................................................... 65 3.5.1. Brief Background to Selected Determinants ................................................... 67 3.6. Conclusion ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Heritage 32 COM
    World Heritage 32 COM Distribution Limited WHC-08/32.COM/8B.Add Paris, 25 June 2008 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty second Session Quebec City, Canada 2 – 10 July 2008 Item 8B of the Provisional Agenda: Nominations to the World Heritage List Nominations to the World Heritage List SUMMARY This Addendum presents the Draft Decisions concerning 5 nominations of properties deferred or referred back by previous sessions of the World Heritage Committee, 21 minor modifications to the boundaries and 29 revisions of Statements of Significance or Statements of Outstanding Universal Value of already inscribed properties and 1 change of criteria to be examined by the World Heritage Committee at its 32nd session in 2008. Decision required: The Committee is requested to examine the Draft Decisions presented in this Addendum and take its Decisions in accordance with paragraphs 153, 155, 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines. I. Changes to criteria of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List The World Heritage Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006) approved 17 changes of criteria numbering for Natural and Mixed properties inscribed for geological values before 1994 (Document WHC- 06/30.COM/8D). For only two properties (see table below), in the group of properties that was inscribed under natural criteria (ii) before 1994, was no change in criteria numbering requested at that time, as the State Party asked for further time to consult the stakeholders concerned. Following consultations with the stakeholders and IUCN, it was agreed that the criteria should be as shown in the table here below.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal
    Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal World Heritage Site Management Plan Progress Report July 2019 Welcome Our World Heritage Site Along with our focus on delivering Management Plan is now in conservation projects in the World Heritage its fourth year and this progress Site we’ve been developing a set of draft attributes of the Outstanding Universal report celebrates the work Value of the World Heritage Site to help of the National Trust and our manage and protect the site. We are also partners over the last year. delighted to see progress on the Ripon Neighbourhood Plan and Harrogate District In September 2018 we had the great Local Plan, both of which include policies news that our first round bid to the to protect the World Heritage Site and National Lottery Heritage Fund for the its setting. Skell Valley Project had been successful. We worked closely with Nidderdale Area Infrastructure continues to be a major of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) challenge. Our car parks, ticket offices, and communities living and working along toilets and café areas have been struggling the river to develop a range of projects to to cope with the growing number of visitors. manage flood risk, improve water quality Following the refurbishment of the visitor and habitats for wildlife and restore centre this year our big focus for 2019/20 neglected historic buildings and landscapes. is the Studley Lake entrance. The project will also extend links between Ripon and the communities upstream to We couldn’t deliver any of this without improve access and explore the stories the support of our partners, local which have shaped the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal
    Admission prices Open all year, a visit can last Current prices are as follows. Fountains Abbey from a few hours to a full 1-13 in group Standard rate applies day... 14+ in group £15.20 adult, £7.60 child & Studley Royal Prices are reviewed annually and may have Explore the dramatic Fountains Abbey, the changed by the date of your visit. most complete ruins of a Cistercian abbey Group Visits in Britain. Group rates are only available when the group organiser checks in and pays at the admission Enjoy a great day out together Wander around the eighteenth century point for the whole group on arrival. at this World Heritage Site water garden with its elegant ornamental lakes, tumbling cascades and temples. Spend a full day exploring Discover Fountains Mill, one of the finest moments in history sitting side surviving examples of a monastic water mill by side at this World Heritage in Britain. Site Enjoy the sight of over 300 wild deer Making a booking in the medieval park at Studley Royal. All group visits need to be pre-booked to Admire the Elizabethan-style facade of receive group rates. Fountains Hall, with paths to the orchard and hidden herb garden. Please contact (during office hours): Annette Tulip, Bookings & Functions Coordinator Visit St Mary’s Church, an outstanding Fountains Abbey & Studley Royal example of Victorian gothic architecture Ripon HG4 3DY m hn ?l n t m hl c q s h‘ ‘ k ß o ? ß ? v k n designed by William Burges. ‘ h q c k c m ? g n d l q ? h d s‘ hm f n d?ß?o‘sqhl United Nations Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey Cultural Organization inscribed on the World Learn more about the estate with a 01765 643197 Heritage List in 1986 Photography © National Trust Images.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / Icomos Advisory Mission to Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites 27-30 October 20
    REPORT ON THE JOINT WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE / ICOMOS ADVISORY MISSION TO STONEHENGE, AVEBURY AND ASSOCIATED SITES Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 27-30 OCTOBER 2015 Chris Barker, Civil Engineer, ICOMOS Nathan Schlanger, Archaeologist, ICOMOS Marie-Noël Tournoux, Project Officer Europe and North America Unit, World Heritage Centre Stonehenge October 2015 copyright UNESCO 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……………………………………………………………….…… 4 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..… 5 2 MISSION REPORT ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 3 MISSION CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………………. 24 4 MISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………...…...... 24 5 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………... 28 6 ANNEXES…………....……………………………………………………………………... 29 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The joint World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS mission thanks the State Party for the arrangements for the Advisory Mission and the preparation of all the necessary relevant materials, together with the good will in its advancement. Particular thanks are due to DCMS and Historic England and more specifically to Keith Nichol and Hannah Jones from DCMS and Henry Owen-John and Phil McMahon from Historic England, our main focal points. The mission would like to acknowledge and to commend the investment and professionalism of our hosts in addition to logistics and hospitality. The assistance gladly provided by Historic England, English Heritage Trust, the National Trust, and their representatives, be it at organizational level or on the ground, including notably Chris Smith, Historic England, and Heather Sebire, Properties Curator West English Heritage Trust, Kate Davies, Stonehenge General Manager, English Heritage Trust, Beth Thomas & Sarah Simmonds, World Heritage site Coordinator, Nicola Snashall, National Trust WHS archaeologist for Stonehenge & Avebury, Cassandra Genn, Senior project and Stakeholder Manager, Ian Wilson, Assistant Director of Operations, Ingrid Samuel, Historic Environment Director, Janet Tomlin, National Trust, as well as the Wiltshire Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Body Evaluation (ICOMOS)
    ICOMOS INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON MONUMENTS AND SITES CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL DES MONUMENTS ET DES SITES CONSEJO INTERNACIONAL DE MONUMENTOS Y SITIOS MDKHYHAPOllHblA COBET no BonpOCAM nAM$lTH"KOB " llOCTOnp"ME4ATEJ1bHbIX MECT WORLD HERITAGE LIST N° 372 A) IDENTIFICATION Nomination: Fountains Abbey and Saint Mary's Church in Studley Royal Location: North Yorkshire State Party United Kingdom Date December 23, 1985 B) ICOMOS RECOMMENDATION That the proposed cultural property be included on the World Heritage List on the condition that the nomination be modified and resubmitted. C) JUSTIFICATION The United Kingdom is nominating to the World Heritage List two groups of monuments located in the immediate surroundings of Studley Royal Park and administered by the National Trust : the ruins of Fountains Abbey and St. Mary's, a neo-Gothic style church. The abbey, which was founded in 1132 by thirteen monks of St. Mary's of York who were searching for an ideal of life in closer keeping with St. Benoit's teachings, owes its success to its early affiliation with the Cistercian order: as early as 1133, Fountains (Sancta Maria de Fontibus) was recognized as a daughter house of Clairvaux. St. Bernard sent Geoffroi d'Ainay, one of his favorite disciples, there to supervise the construction of the first buildings. From the very start the abbey benefitted from large donations. In 1135 the Dean of the Chapter of York, along with two canons, retired there with his library and his fortune. The precarious community which Abbot Richard wished to place under the protection of St. Bernard was saved. In the 13th century its land wealth grew to enormous proportions and as some contemporaries observed, one could cover 30 miles (48km) without ever leaving the lands of the abbey.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountains Abbey
    Fountains Abbey From Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountains_Abbey (19.05.2008) Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey* UNESCO World Heritage Site View of Fountains Abbey looking from east to south. Fountains Abbey in North Yorkshire, England, is a ruined Cistercian monastery, founded in 1132. Fountains Abbey is one of the largest and best preserved Cistercian houses in England. It is a Grade I listed building and owned by the National Trust. Along with the adjacent Studley Royal Water Garden, it is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. History Fountains Abbey was founded in 1132 following a dispute and riot at St. Mary's Abbey in York. Following the riot, thirteen monks were exiled and after unsuccessfully attempting to return to the early 6th century Rule of St Benedict, were taken into the protection of Thurstan, Archbishop of York. He provided them with a site in the valley of the River Skell. The enclosed valley had all the required materials for the creation of a monastery, providing shelter from the weather, stone and timber for building, and a running supply of water.[1]. The monks applied to join the Cistercian order in AD1132. The abbey operated until 1539, when Henry VIII ordered the Dissolution of the Monasteries. The Abbey buildings and over 500 acres (2 km²) of land were then sold by the Crown, on October 1, 1540 [1], to Sir Richard Gresham, the London merchant, father of the founder of the Royal Exchange, Sir Thomas Gresham.[2] Architecture Interior looking down the Nave Construction of the Abbey began in 1132, with rock quarried locally, although the original monastery buildings received considerable additions and alterations in the later period of the order, causing deviations from the strict Cistercian type.
    [Show full text]
  • EXMIQ052 National Trust Appendix 1
    Proposal for a Buffer Zone for the World Heritage Site of Studley Royal Park including the ruins of Fountains Abbey Submission to the World Heritage Centre February 2012 Studley Royal, including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey, Buffer Zone submission Dec 2011 1 PROPOSAL FOR A BUFFER ZONE FOR THE WORLD HERITAGE SITE OF STUDLEY ROYAL PARK INCLUDING THE RUINS OF FOUNTAINS ABBEY - SUBMISSION TO THE WORLD HERITAGE CENTRE FEBRUARY 2012 Prepared by the National Trust and English Heritage December 2011 Introduction Although the area within the boundary of the World Heritage Site is unlikely to be subject to development proposals which adversely impact upon its outstanding universal value (due to the fact that it is wholly managed by the National Trust), outside the designated World Heritage Site there are a number of developments which could, potentially, threaten its outstanding universal value. For example large scale or poorly sited renewable energy schemes, large-scale agricultural developments, and inappropriately sited buildings could harm its setting or key views into and out of the designated area. Since 2001 there has been a proposal in the Fountains Abbey and Studley Royal World Heritage Site Management Plan to establish a buffer zone for Studley Royal Park including the ruins of Fountains Abbey World Heritage Site. The requirement for a buffer zone was again raised in the Periodic Monitoring Report 2006. The Periodic Monitoring Report stated that the boundaries of the site were inadequate and there was a need to define a formal buffer zone. It stated ‘Although the World Heritage Site boundary covers the core area of the designed landscape, some significant features lie outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Sources for Further Reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography
    Bibliography Sources for further reading May 2011 National Trust Bibliography Introduction Over many years a great deal has been published about the properties and collections in the care of the National Trust, yet to date no single record of those publications has been established. The following Bibliography is a first attempt to do just that, and provides a starting point for those who want to learn more about the properties and collections in the National Trust’s care. Inevitably this list will have gaps in it. Do please let us know of additional material that you feel might be included, or where you have spotted errors in the existing entries. All feedback to [email protected] would be very welcome. Please note the Bibliography does not include minor references within large reference works, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, or to guidebooks published by the National Trust. How to use The Bibliography is arranged by property, and then alphabetically by author. For ease of use, clicking on a hyperlink will take you from a property name listed on the Contents Page to the page for that property. ‘Return to Contents’ hyperlinks will take you back to the contents page. To search by particular terms, such as author or a theme, please make use of the ‘Find’ function, in the ‘Edit’ menu (or use the keyboard shortcut ‘[Ctrl] + [F]’). Locating copies of books, journals or specific articles Most of the books, and some journals and magazines, can of course be found in any good library. For access to rarer titles a visit to one of the country’s copyright libraries may be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • C16 Doc-16-Unesco
    UNESCO The World Heritage THE AMERICAS ANTIGUA and BARBUDA 1983 Los Glaciares ARGENTINA 1978 Iguazu National Park ARGENTINA and BRAZIL Jesuit Missions of the Guaranis BELIZE 1990 Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System City of Potosi BOLIVIA 1976 Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos Historic City of Sucre Historic Town of Ouro Preto Historic Centre of the Town of Olinda Historic Centre of Salvador de Bahia Sanctuary of Bom Jesus do Congonhas BRAZIL 1977 Iguacu National Park Brasilia Serra de Capivara National Park Historic Centre of Sao Luis L’ Anse aux Meadows National Historic Park Nahanni National Park Dinosaur Provincial Park Anthony Island Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump Complex CANADA 1976 Wood Buffalo National Park Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks Quebec (Historic area) Gros Morne National Lunenburg Old Town Tatshenshini-Alsek, Kluane, Wrangell- St. Elias CANADA and UNITED STATES OF and Glacier Bay Parks AMERICA Waterton Glacier International Peace Park CHILE 1980 Rapa Nui National Park Carthagena Los Katios National Park COLOMBIA 1983 Historic Centre of Santa Cruz de Mompox National Archaeological Park of Tierradentro San Agustin Archaeological Park COSTA RICA 1977 Cocos Island National Park COSTA RICA and PANAMA Talamanca-La Amistad Old Havana CUBA 1981 Trinidad and the Valley de los Ingenios San Pedro de la Roca Castle, Santiago de Cuba DOMINICA 1985 Morne Trois Pitons National Park DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1985 Colonial City of Santo Domingo Galapagos Islands ECUADOR 1975 City of Quito Sangay National
    [Show full text]
  • 1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal
    Periodic Report - Second Cycle Section II-Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey 1. World Heritage Property Data 2. Fountains Abbey, Studley Royal, Garden, Historic Ruins, Yorkshire 1.1 - Name of World Heritage Property 3. Map of the World Heritage site Studley Royal Park including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey Comment On link 1. to OUR PLACE - the site has not yet been officially 1.2 - World Heritage Property Details documented by OUR PLACE photography team. Link 2. is correct. Link 3. takes you through to MAGIC and you then State(s) Party(ies) need to use the system to find the WHS map. Can you insert United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland the map link used in Question 1.4? Type of Property cultural 1.8 - Other designations / Conventions under which the property is protected (if applicable) Identification Number 372bis Comment The property is not protected by any other international Year of inscription on the World Heritage List designations/conventions. The protective designations such 1986 as listed buildings and scheduled monuments are set out in Question 4.2.1. 1.3 - Geographic Information Table Name Coordinates Property Buffer Total Inscription 2. Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (longitude / (ha) zone (ha) year latitude) (ha) 0 / 0 ? ? ? 2.1 - Statement of Outstanding Universal Value / Statement of Significance 0 / 0 ? ? ? Studley Royal Park 54.116 / -1.573 308.8 811 1119.8 1986 including the Ruins Statement of Significance of Fountains Abbey , North Studley Royal Park, including the ruins of Fountains Abbey, Yorkshire , England combines into one harmonious whole buildings, gardens and Component 2 , 54.109 / -1.588 0.85 811 811.85 1986 landscapes constructed over a period of 800 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Section II: Summary of the Periodic Report on the State of Conservation
    State of Conservation of World Heritage Properties in Europe SECTION II integrated into the scheme and is a building of UNITED KINGDOM importance in its own right as an outstanding example of High Victorian architecture by one of its Studley Royal Park including the leading exponents. Ruins of Fountains Abbey Garden landscape, water gardens, abbey ruins, Jacobean mansion and Victorian church are all of exceptional merit and together justify the inclusion Brief description of Studley Royal in the World Heritage List. A striking landscape was created around the ruins UNESCO Criteria: i, ii, iv, v and vi. of the Cistercian Fountains Abbey and Fountains Hall Castle, in Yorkshire. The 18th-century As provided in ICOMOS evaluation landscaping, gardens and canal, the 19th-century plantations and vistas, and the neo-Gothic castle of The Fountains site owes its originality and striking Studley Royal Park, make this an outstanding site. beauty to the fact that a humanised landscape of exceptional value was constituted around the largest medieval ruins of the United Kingdom. In the 1. Introduction definition of this cultural property it is essential that the small Fountains Hall Castle, the landscaping, Year(s) of Inscription 1986 the gardens and canal created by John Aislabie in Agency responsible for site management the 18th century, the plantations and vistas of the 19th century and finally Studley Royal Church, as • Mailing Address(es) an additional element of the site, all be expressly Fountains Abbey Estate Office included. HG4 3DY Ripon North Yorkshire Committee Decision United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected] Bureau (1986): The Bureau recommended website: www.fountainsabbey.org.uk inscription of this property on condition that the British authorities redraft the proposal in such a way as to include expressly in the definition of this 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ref: CL/WHC/14/02 27 November 2002 To
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP Tel. : + 33 (0) 1.45.68.15.71 Fax : + 33 (0) 1.45.68.55.70 Ref: CL/WHC/14/02 27 November 2002 To: Permanent Delegations, Observer Missions and National Commissions of States Parties to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention in Europe and North America Madam/Sir, Subject: Periodic Reporting on the application of the World Heritage Convention and on the state of conservation of World Heritage properties in Europe and North America I have the honor to draw your attention to Article 29 of the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention which requests that “The States Parties to this Convention shall, in the reports which they submit to the General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (…), give information on the legislative and administrative provisions which they have adopted and other action which they have taken for the application of this Convention, together with details of the experience acquired in this field”. The twenty-ninth General Conference of UNESCO in 1997, requested the World Heritage Committee to define the periodicity, form, nature and extent of the periodic reporting on the application of the World Heritage Convention and on the state of conservation of World Heritage properties and to examine and respond to these reports. The World Heritage Committee, at its twenty-second session in December 1998, decided to invite States Parties to the World Heritage Convention to submit the periodic reports every six years in accordance with the Format for periodic reports as adopted by the Committee.
    [Show full text]