DOCSLIB.ORG

Reporting of Light Irradiation Conditions in 300 Laboratory Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reporting of Light Irradiation Conditions in 300 Laboratory Studies d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 5 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 414–421 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect jo urnal homepage: www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema Reporting of light irradiation conditions in 300 laboratory studies of resin-composites a,∗ b,c b David C. Watts , Christina Kaiser , Catherine O’Neill , b,∗∗ Richard Bengt Price a School of Medical Sciences and Photon Science Institute, University of Manchester, UK b Dalhousie University, Faculty of Dentistry, Dental Clinical Sciences, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada c Bonn-Rhine-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Natural Sciences, Rheinbach, Germany a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Objective. To evaluate how the light delivered to resin-composites was described in recent Received 29 September 2018 articles. Received in revised form Method. PubMed was searched for 300 articles published between January 2017 and May 10 December 2018 2018 with keywords relating to photocuring of dental materials. The articles examined a Accepted 10 December 2018 wide range of resin-composite properties and performance. For each article, the information provided about the light curing unit (LCU), the light curing conditions and the characteristics and quantity of the light used in the study were recorded. Specifically, the type of LCU used; Keywords: the irradiance; how the irradiance was measured; the exposure times; whether the light Light curing energy (radiant exposure) received by the specimen was determined, or if only the light Resins output at the LCU tip was measured; whether the distance between the tip of the LCU and Bulk fill the specimen was reported; and whether the emission spectrum from the LCU was reported. Bond strength Where possible, the resin manufacturer’s minimum energy requirement (MER: the product of Light measurement the recommended minimum exposure time and irradiance) was compared to the radiant Research reproducibility and exposure delivered to the specimen. replicability Results. Of the 300 articles examined, 217 were published in 2017 and 83 in 2018. Of these articles, 130 (43%) were found in open access journals, and 170 (57%) were in subscription- based journals. The name of the LCU used was not provided in 31 articles, 14 articles did not provide the exposure time, and 227 articles did not report the distance to the specimen. An irradiance value was reported in 231 articles, but this was the irradiance received by the specimen in only 48 instances. The emission spectrum from the LCU was reported in 2 15 articles. There was a large range in the radiant exposures from below 10 J/cm to greater 2 than 100 J/cm . ∗ Corresponding author at: University of Manchester, School of Medical Sciences and Photon Science Institute, Coupland 3 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. ∗∗ Corresponding author at: Dalhousie University, Faculty of Dentistry, Dental Clinical Sciences, 5981 University Ave Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D.C. Watts), [email protected] (R.B. Price). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.12.001 0109-5641/© 2018 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 5 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 414–421 415 Significance. The majority of articles from 2017 and early 2018 did not include sufficient description of the characteristics and quantity of the light received by the resin-composite specimens to allow the study to be replicated. It is recommended that future articles should report: (1) the identity of the LCU used; (2) the radiant exposure received by the specimen 2 (J/cm ); and (3) appropriate reference to the emission spectrum from the LCU. © 2018 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. the resin-composites that they light-cure [3]. They often hold 1. Introduction the LCU tip at some distance away from the resin-composite [3], and the LCU often moves or is held at an angle to the sur- The use of light-cured resins has revolutionized modern den- face of the restoration, thus decreasing the radiant exposure tistry. With the agreement of many nations to phase down received by the resin [10–12]. the use of amalgam as part of the Minamata agreement In contrast, Type II studies are concerned with the behavior [1,2], the light curing unit (LCU) will become an indispensable of the material, particularly mechanical strength properties. piece of equipment in almost every dental office. However, When evaluating such resin-composite properties, different despite the routine use of the LCU both in dental offices non-clinical specimen shapes and sizes are used. Rectangular and laboratory studies, the importance of the characteris- cross-section bars are used for 3-point flexure strength mea- tics (wavelength and the beam profile) of the light from the surements. Similar bars with a small central crack are used LCU and the quantity of the light received by the specimen in fracture-toughness studies, and short solid cylinders are (radiant exposure) are poorly understood and described [3–6]. used for compressive creep experiments. In these cases, the Within a resin-composite the degree of conversion, which maximum values for the investigated properties of the resin- describes the extent to which monomer has been converted composite are being examined, and it is deemed appropriate (cured) into a polymer, is related to both the spectral radiant to irradiate the resin-composites from multiple directions power (W/nm) and the radiant exposure received by the resin- (e.g., from the top, bottom and sides) with longer irradiation 2 composite (J/cm ) — the latter value is calculated from the times than would be the case clinically. In such cases, it is not 2 product of the irradiance (W/cm ) received and the exposure necessary to match “clinical reality”, but it is useful to know duration. In a preliminary study [7] that examined 100 arti- the emission spectrum of the light and the radiant exposure cles from 2010 to 2012, it was reported that it was impossible (characteristics and quantity of the light) that was delivered to determine how much light energy (radiant exposure) was to the specimen. delivered to the resin-composites in 46 (46%) articles. It was It has been reported that many studies cannot be replicated also reported that 40 of the 54 articles where the light energy or reproduced, especially among different laboratories [13–15]. could be quantified, delivered more than twice the minimum One reason may be that a study can only be replicated, or the radiant exposure recommended by the resin manufacturers results reproduced if the conditions under which the speci- to photocure the resin specimens. They considered that such mens have been fabricated and stored before measurement radiant exposure far exceeded the MER values recommended have been reported, but this information is rarely provided. by the manufacturers, and so did not reflect “clinical reality”. In an attempt to address such issues, the Academy of Dental Since long-term (5 + years) randomized clinical trials are often Materials has produced a range of guidelines for investiga- unfeasible before a product is released on the market [8,9], tors to follow so that, in principle, the experiments could be well-designed laboratory studies are an essential means to replicated [16]. In addition, the International System of Units (SI) evaluate photocured resin materials. We can divide these lab- nomenclature should be used by authors so that all readers oratory studies into two main categories that we will call Type know what is being described. I and Type II. In radiometry, the radiant power (radiant flux) describes Type I studies are primarily concerned with the aspects the energy emitted or received per unit time. The SI unit for and outcomes of the photocuring process itself. These stud- radiant power is a Watt which is defined as one Joule per ies include measurements (some in real time) of the light second. The irradiance is the radiant power that is received, transmission, depth of cure (DoC), degree of conversion (DC), not emitted, by a surface divided by the area. The SI unit for cell toxicity, shrinkage kinetics, early modulus development, 2 irradiance is W/m [6,17], although in dentistry it is usually shrinkage stress (within a defined host environment) and 2 expressed as mW/cm . The irradiance value that is frequently cuspal deflection. In such studies, the characteristics (wave- reported is often not the irradiance received by the specimen length) and quantity (radiant exposure) of light received by the but is instead the radiant exitance from the LCU. Although the resin-composite specimen should be reported. These values radiant exitance may be the same as the irradiance at 0 mm should also correspond to what a dentist could be expected distance from the light tip, this may not describe what the to deliver in “clinical reality”. This may, or may not, be the specimen actually receives because the specimens are often same as what the manufacturer recommends because many several millimeters away from the LCU tip. Furthermore, an dentists deliver a lower radiant exposure than the minimum irradiance value cannot describe how powerful a curing light that is recommended by the resin-composite manufacturer is because the area of the tip is part of the calculation and a [7,10,11]. Dentists will often use the same exposure time for all 416 d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s 3 5 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 414–421 curing light can deliver a high irradiance, but yet not be very free radicals more slowly and are less efficient than Type I powerful.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Far Infrared Radiation Exposure
    INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON‐IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION ICNIRP STATEMENT ON FAR INFRARED RADIATION EXPOSURE PUBLISHED IN: HEALTH PHYSICS 91(6):630‐645; 2006 ICNIRP PUBLICATION – 2006 ICNIRP Statement ICNIRP STATEMENT ON FAR INFRARED RADIATION EXPOSURE The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection* INTRODUCTION the health hazards associated with these hot environ- ments. Heat strain and discomfort (thermal pain) nor- THE INTERNATIONAL Commission on Non Ionizing Radia- mally limit skin exposure to infrared radiation levels tion Protection (ICNIRP) currently provides guidelines below the threshold for skin-thermal injury, and this is to limit human exposure to intense, broadband infrared particularly true for sources that emit largely IR-C. radiation (ICNIRP 1997). The guidelines that pertained Furthermore, limits for lengthy infrared exposures would to infrared radiation (IR) were developed initially with an have to consider ambient temperatures. For example, an aim to provide guidance for protecting against hazards infrared irradiance of 1 kW mϪ2 (100 mW cmϪ2)atan from high-intensity artificial sources and to protect work- ambient temperature of 5°C can be comfortably warm- ers in hot industries. Detailed guidance for exposure to ing, but at an ambient temperature of 30°C this irradiance longer far-infrared wavelengths (referred to as IR-C would be painful and produce severe heat strain. There- radiation) was not provided because the energy at longer fore, ICNIRP provided guidelines to limit skin exposure wavelengths from most lamps and industrial infrared to pulsed sources and very brief exposures where thermal sources of concern actually contribute only a small injury could take place faster than the pain response time fraction of the total radiant heat energy and did not and where environmental temperature and the irradiated require measurement.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    GLOSSARY OF TERMS Terminology Used for Ultraviolet (UV) Curing Process Design and Measurement This glossary of terms has been assembled in order to provide users, formulators, suppliers and researchers with terms that are used in the design and measurement of UV curing systems. It was prompted by the scattered and sometimes incorrect terms used in industrial UV curing technologies. It is intended to provide common and technical meanings as used in and appropriate for UV process design, measurement, and specification. General scientific terms are included only where they relate to UV Measurements. The object is to be "user-friendly," with descriptions and comments on meaning and usage, and minimum use of mathematical and strict definitions, but technically correct. Occasionally, where two or more terms are used similarly, notes will indicate the preferred term. For historical and other reasons, terms applicable to UV Curing may vary slightly in their usage from other sciences. This glossary is intended to 'close the gap' in technical language, and is recommended for authors, suppliers and designers in UV Curing technologies. absorbance An index of the light or UV absorbed by a medium compared to the light transmitted through it. Numerically, it is the logarithm of the ratio of incident spectral irradiance to the transmitted spectral irradiance. It is unitless number. Absorbance implies monochromatic radiation, although it is sometimes used as an average applied over a specified wavelength range. absorptivity (absorption coefficient) Absorbance per unit thickness of a medium. actinometer A chemical system or physical device that determines the number of photons in a beam integrally or per unit time.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton University Laser Safety Training Guide
    Laser Safety Training Guide Environmental Health and Safety http://www.princeton.edu/ehs September 2007 LASER SAFETY TRAINING GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: LASER FUNDAMENTALS 3 LASER Theory And Operation 4 Components Of A Laser 5 Types Of Lasers 6 SECTION 2: LASER HAZARDS 8 BEAM-RELATED HAZARDS 8 Types of Beam Exposure 9 Eye 9 Skin 12 NON-BEAM HAZARDS 12 Electrical Hazards 13 Laser Generated Air Contaminants -- The “Plume” 14 Collateral and Plasma Radiation 14 Fire Hazards 15 Compressed Gases 15 Laser Dyes 15 SECTION 3: LASER HAZARD CLASSIFICATION 17 SECTION 4: LASER CONTROL MEASURES 19 Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) 19 Accessible Exposrue Limit 19 Optical Density (OD) 19 Nominal Hazard Zone (NHZ) 20 Control Measures by Laser Classification 21 Protective Equipment 27 Protective Eyewear 27 Laser Eye Protection Selection Process 27 Other Protective Equipment 28 Special Controls for UltraViolet and Infrared Lasers 29 SECTION 5: LASER SAFETY AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 30 SECTION 6: GLOSSARY 33 APPENDIX A: SELECTED ANSI STANDARD TABLES 36 APPENDIX B: LASER SAFETY TIPS 43 APPENDIX C: LASER SAFETY CHECKLIST 44 2 Section 1: LASER FUNDAMENTALS Introduction The word laser is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. Lasers are used as research aides in many departments at Princeton University. In this document, the word laser will be limited to electromagnetic radiation-emitting devices using light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation at wavelengths from 180 nanometers to 1 millimeter. The electromagnetic spectrum includes energy ranging from gamma rays to electricity. Figure 1 illustrates the total electromagnetic spectrum and wavelengths of the various regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Terms Glossary
    LASER TERMS GLOSSARY Texas State University – San Marcos 2/25/07 Risk Management & Safety LASER TERMS GLOSSARY Introduction - This section lists information pertinent to laser safety. The definitions in this glossary will not cover every term associated with lasers but does cover a majority of the terms. If a term should be encountered in your work with lasers and is not in this glossary, consult your supervisor or call the Texas State University Risk Management and Safety Office. Laser Terms ABSORPTION: means the transformation of radiant energy to a different form by interaction with matter. ACCESS CONTROL: Entry must be restricted to authorized laser personnel during the operation of laser equipment. ACCESSIBLE EMISSION LIMIT (AEL): - means the maximum accessible emission level permitted within a particular class. WAVELENGTH DURATION CLASS 1 CLASS 2 CLASS 3a CLASS 3b CLASS 4 (μm) (s) (W) (W) (W) (W) (W) Ultraviolet 0.18 to 0.302 3x104 ≤ 9.6x10-9 - Between 1 to 5 > Class 3a but > 0.5 0.302 to 0.4 3x104 ≤ 3.2x10-6 times Class 1 ≤ 0.5 Visible > Class 1 Less than 5 > Class 3a but 0.4 to 0.7 10 ≤ 0.4x10-3 > 0.5 but < 0.001 times Class 2 ≤ 0.5 Near IR ≤ 0.4x10-3 Between 1 to 5 > Class 3a but 0.7 to 1.05 ≥ 10 - > 0.5 to <1.9x10-3 times Class 1 ≤ 0.5 IR 1.05 to 1.15 ≤ 1.9x10-3 ≤ 1.9x10-3 Between 1 to 5 > Class 3a but 1.15 to 1.2 ≥ 10 - > 0.5 to 1.5x10-2 times Class 1 ≤ 0.5 1.2 to 1.4 ≤ 1.5x10-2 Far IR Between 1 to 5 > Class 3a but 1.4 to 100 ≥ 10 ≤ 9.6x10-3 - > 0.5 times Class 1 ≤ 0.5 AGENCY: means the Texas Department of State Health Services Radiation Control agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiometry and Photometry
    Radiometry and Photometry Wei-Chih Wang Department of Power Mechanical Engineering National TsingHua University W. Wang Materials Covered • Radiometry - Radiant Flux - Radiant Intensity - Irradiance - Radiance • Photometry - luminous Flux - luminous Intensity - Illuminance - luminance Conversion from radiometric and photometric W. Wang Radiometry Radiometry is the detection and measurement of light waves in the optical portion of the electromagnetic spectrum which is further divided into ultraviolet, visible, and infrared light. Example of a typical radiometer 3 W. Wang Photometry All light measurement is considered radiometry with photometry being a special subset of radiometry weighted for a typical human eye response. Example of a typical photometer 4 W. Wang Human Eyes Figure shows a schematic illustration of the human eye (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1994). The inside of the eyeball is clad by the retina, which is the light-sensitive part of the eye. The illustration also shows the fovea, a cone-rich central region of the retina which affords the high acuteness of central vision. Figure also shows the cell structure of the retina including the light-sensitive rod cells and cone cells. Also shown are the ganglion cells and nerve fibers that transmit the visual information to the brain. Rod cells are more abundant and more light sensitive than cone cells. Rods are 5 sensitive over the entire visible spectrum. W. Wang There are three types of cone cells, namely cone cells sensitive in the red, green, and blue spectral range. The approximate spectral sensitivity functions of the rods and three types or cones are shown in the figure above 6 W. Wang Eye sensitivity function The conversion between radiometric and photometric units is provided by the luminous efficiency function or eye sensitivity function, V(λ).
    [Show full text]
  • EL for Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP SC-IV Member Seibersdorf Laboratories, Austria
    ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 EL for Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP SC-IV Member Seibersdorf Laboratories, Austria Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 100 nm ~400 nm 780 nm 1 mm UV vis IR Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 Exposure Limits •UV –s() • UV-A • Retina photochemical • Retina thermal •Infraredeye • Skin (vis. and IR) Photographs courtesy of P Söderberg JP Cesarini and Univ. Michigan, Kellogg Eye Center Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 Exposure Limits •UV –s() • UV-A • Retina photochemical • Retina thermal • Infrared eye • Skin (vis. and IR) Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 Current Guidelines: ICNIRP Guidelines on limits of exposure to broad-band incoherent optical radiation (0.38-3µm) Health Phys. 73: 539-554; 1997 New Edition of Guidelines for visible and IR: Open Consultation 2011 Health Physics Publication: End 2012/Beginning 2013 Product Standards updated in parallel: CIES009/ IEC 62471 (Lamp Product Safety Standard) IEC 60825-1 (Laser Product Safety Standard) Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 Absorption location and mechanism overview •UV-C, B •UV-A P H O T O- •vis C H E M I C A L E = h * •IR-A •IR-B, C T H E R M A L Broadband Optical Radiation Karl Schulmeister ICNIRP 7th International NIR Workshop Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9-11 May 2012 Changes in Guidelines .
    [Show full text]
  • Radtech Buyers Guide
    UV Glossary Feature of Terms Terminology Used for Ultraviolet (UV) Curing Process Design and Measurement This glossary of terms has been assembled in order to provide users, formulators, suppliers and researchers with terms that are used in the design and measurement of UV-curing systems. It was prompted by the scattered and sometimes incorrect terms used in industrial UV-curing technologies. It is intended to provide common and technical meanings as used in and appropriate for UV process design, measurement and specification. General scientific terms are included only where they relate to UV Measurements. The object is to be “user-friendly,” with descriptions and comments on meaning and usage, and minimum use of mathematical and strict definitions, but technically correct. Occasionally, where two or more terms are used similarly, notes will indicate the preferred term. For historical and other reasons, terms applicable to UV curing may vary slightly in their usage from other sciences. This glossary is intended to “close the gap” in technical language, and is recommended for authors, suppliers and designers in UV-curing technologies. absorbance had small amounts of metal halide(s) wavelengths (IR) are called “cold An index of the light or UV absorbed added to the mercury within the bulb. mirrors,” while reflectors having by a medium compared to the light These materials will emit their character- enhanced reflectance to long transmitted through it. Numerically, it is istic wavelengths in addition to the wavelengths are called “hot mirrors.” the logarithm of the ratio of incident mercury emissions. [This term is diffuse spectral irradiance to the transmitted preferred over doped lamps.] A characteristic of a surface that spectral irradiance.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Laser Terms Absorb to Transform Radiant Energy Into a Different Form, with a Resultant Rise in Temperature. Absorpt
    Glossary of Laser Terms Absorb To transform radiant energy into a different form, with a resultant rise in temperature. Absorption Transformation of radiant energy to a different form of energy by the interaction with matter, depending on temperature and wavelength. Accessible Emission Level The magnitude of accessible laser (or collateral) radiation of a specific wavelength or emission duration at a particular point as measured by appropriate methods and devices. Also means radiation to which human access is possible in accordance with the definitions of the laser's hazard classification. Accessible Emission Limit (AEL) The maximum accessible emission level permitted within a particular class. In ANSI Z 136.1, AEL is determined as the product of accessible emission Maximum Permissible Exposure limit (MPE) and the area of the limiting aperture (7 mm for visible and near-infrared lasers). Aperture An opening through which radiation can pass. Argon A gas used as a laser medium. It emits blue-green light primarily at 448 and 515 nm. Attenuation The decrease in energy (or power) as a beam passes through an absorbing or scattering medium. Aversion Response Movement of the eyelid or the head to avoid an exposure to a noxious stimulant, bright light. It can occur within 0.25 seconds, and it includes the blink reflex time. Beam A collection of rays that may be parallel, convergent, or divergent. Beam Diameter The distance between diametrically opposed points in the cross section of a circular beam where the intensity is reduced by a factor of e-1 (0.368) of the peak level (for safety standards).
    [Show full text]
  • Degradation in PV Encapsulation Transmittance: an Interlaboratory Study Towards a Climate-Specific Test Preprint David C
    Degradation in PV Encapsulation Transmittance: An Interlaboratory Study Towards a Climate-Specific Test Preprint David C. Miller, Eleonora Annigoni, Amal Ballion, Jayesh G. Bokria, Laura S. Bruckman, David M. Burns, Xinxin Chen, Lamont Elliott, Jiangtao Feng, Roger H. French, Sean Fowler, Xiaohong Gu, Peter L. Hacke, Christian C. Honeker, Michael D. Kempe, Hussam Khonkar, Michael Köhl, Laure-Emmanuelle Perret-Aebi, Nancy H. Phillips, Kurt P. Scott, Fanny Sculati-Meillaud, Tsuyoshi Shioda, Shigeo Suga, Shin Watanabe, and John H. Wohlgemuth See inside for authors’ affiliations Presented at the 42nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference New Orleans, Louisiana June 14–19, 2015 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Conference Paper NREL/CP-5J00-63508 August 2015 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (Alliance), a contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Accordingly, the US Government and Alliance retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • LUXEON IR Family Eye Safety Assembly and Handling Guidelines
    INFRARED LUXEON IR Family Eye Safety Assembly and Handling Guidelines Introduction Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) are becoming the standard light source for illumination infrared (IR) applications. High power LEDs have a high optical radiating power and a small light emitting surface, resulting in brightness of the light emission surface that is significant with respect to the lamps safety standard. The IEC-62471:2006 standard “Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems” is applicable when considering the eye and skin safety impact by LEDs. This application brief covers LEDs and lamps with IR wavelengths. The standard (IEC-62471:2006) defines exposure limits (EL) for eye and skin which depend on exposure duration and on whether a lamp emits in continuous or pulsed mode. Depending on the radiating power and brightness, lamps and LEDs are categorized into risk groups. Depending on the risk group classification, the manufacturer may need to put warning labels on products and\or packaging and include instructions for users. In this application brief some examples are given on how to classify the risk group. It gives an overview of the IEC-62471 standard and does not necessarily cover all application conditions. For final product classification and eye safety certification, the manufacturer should check with accredited laboratories that can assist in the exact classification of the product with IR LEDs. This application brief will focus on IR-A (700nm-1000nm) radiation and contains examples of exposure limit calculations. As the focus is on IR exposure, the photochemical hazards from UV, blue light and retinal blue hazard are assumed to be negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiometric Quantities and Units Used in Photobiology And
    Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2007, 83: 425–432 Radiometric Quantities and Units Used in Photobiology and Photochemistry: Recommendations of the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (International Commission on Illumination) David H. Sliney* International Commission on Illumination (CIE), Vienna, Austria and Laser ⁄ Optical Radiation Program, US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Gunpowder, MD Received 14 November 2006; accepted 16 November 2006; published online 20 November 2006 DOI: 10.1562 ⁄ 2006-11-14-RA-1081 ABSTRACT The International Commission on Illumination, the CIE, has provided international guidance in the science, termi- To characterize photobiological and photochemical phenomena, nology and measurement of light and optical radiation since standardized terms and units are required. Without a uniform set 1913. The International Lighting Vocabulary (parts of which of descriptors, much of the scientific value of publications can be are also issued as an ISO or IEC standard) has been an lost. Attempting to achieve an international consensus for a international reference for photochemists and photobiolo- common language has always been difficult, but now with truly gists for many decades; and the next revision is due to be international scientific publications, it is all the more important. published later this year or next (2). Despite its stature, As photobiology and photochemistry both represent the fusion of many research scientists are unfamiliar with some of the several scientific disciplines, it is not surprising that the physical subtle distinctions between several widely used radiometric terms used to describe exposures and dosimetric concepts can terms. Tables 1–4 provide several standardized terms that vary from author to author.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Units of Itfeasure · the International System of Units'(SI}
    AppendlxA Terms and Units of Itfeasure · The International System of Units'(SI} The International System of Units, abbreviated SI, as defmed in International Standard ISO 1000, is described in this appendix. International Standard ISO 1000 was approved by International Organization of Standards (ISO) Member Bodies from 30 countries including the United States. The SI consists of the following: 1. Seven base units 2. AlI the derived units 3. Two supplementary units 4. The series of approved prefixes for multiples and submultiples of units. The units which apply to optical safety, their defmitions, their symbols, and the for­ mation of multiple and submultiple units are presented in this appendix. Informa­ tion related to style, use, and format is also provided. A.l TIlE TIlREE CLASSES OF UNITS IN TIlE SI The units of the International System of Units are divided into three classes: 1. Base units 2. Derived units 3. Supplementary units. Scientifically and technical1y this classification is partially arbitrary. The 10th General Conference of Weights and Measures (1954) adopted as base units ofthe SI the units of the quantities: length, mass, time, electric current, thermodynamic temperature, amount of substance, and luminous intensity which by convention are regarded as dimensional1y independent. Associated with these quantities are seven well-defmed units. This action was taken in the interest of achieving the advantages of having a single, practical, internationally accepted system for trade, education, science, and technology. The derived units are the units of quantities that can be formed by combining base quantities and other derived quantities according to the rules of algebra.
    [Show full text]