Frederick Douglass L-O-' ....:~ ,V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Frederick Douglass L-O-' ....:~ ,V ,-a.cu!,~~ on "J'ul'i ll.\ 1 2D_\3 lcia't J:\«- \ ,"'c.1/v-. ~"''-'~/ r,'\~ IN\ ""'- V v,- J, •.:, ¼ ) led hair, or gold, or pearls, or ~'i •$ ~ Qp~ (which becometh women pro­ Frederick Douglass L-o-' ....:~ ,V:, I with good works. The word in 1818-1895 ~c.. C.-,.\~~ ed "professing," would be more preaching godliness, or enjoin­ :ods, or conducting public war­ Frederick Douglass was born a slave in 1818 on a farm in Maryland. His mother, bing the duty of female minis­ an enslaved black woman named Harriet Bailey, was sent back lo lhe fields soon pparel, the aposlie proceeds to afler his birth, and he spent his early childhood with his grandmother Betsey Bailey. 1roprietics which probably pre- His father was a while man whose identity Douglass never learned; possibly he was 1esian church, similar to those Aaron Anthony, the plantation overseer who owned his mother, or Edward Lloyd, :proved among the Corinthian the landowner Anthony worked for. , "Let the women LEARN in si­ At the age of six Frederick was taken from his grandmother to serve as a com­ ection; but I suffer not a woman urp authority over the man, but panion, first, to one of Lloyd's young sons, and then, in Baltimore, to the young son 1rquietness. Herc again it is evi- of Anthony's daughler's brother-in-law, Hugh Auld. Auld's wife Sophia, unaccus­ 1en, of whom he was speaking, tomed to managing slaves, treated Frederick very well at first and began to teach to learn in silence, which could him to read, until her husband put a stop to it (see our first set of excerpts, from public ministrations to others. Douglass's first autobiography). Eager to learn, however, Frederick found ways to verse 12, is one of very general , continue his education surreptitiously. He pored over an old copy of TireCo/111111,ian ~4""--h\t.l­ in this place more properly be Orator, a collection of speeches used to teach rhetoric. The ideals expressed in &t..... L-lA I,.~ l is highly probable that women some of these speeches, as well as what he was learning about the abolition move~ k-f-h.i, n in bondage, when set free by ment from secretly reading newspapers, began to convince Frederick that slavery the restraints imposed upon wa.'iwrong and that he should resist it. b~t-H,,..... ,"'"' ·aditions and heathen customs, In 1833 he was sent back from Baltimore to the Maryland E!)SlernShore, 10 "'-'¼ v,.4{;- ! in their public assemblies, and igious services by frequent in- Thomas Auld, Hugh's brother. Frederick quickly got in trouble for organi1.inga 1 they could have had answered Sunday school for fellow slaves, at which he taught reading and writing. Auld de­ home. cided to hire him out for the year of 1834 to the farmer Edward Covey, known a... a ~ cr<.A-(..,.~ ,.f- "breaker" of rebellious slaves. After months of brutal treatment, Frederick finally ;amination and comparison of 1....,.s+-~t--u v-...) •• 1 I have endeavored to explain, attacked Covey, and after this battle was never whipped again. In 1835 Auld took 11 and 14, and I Tim. 2, 8- 12. him away from Covey and hired him to a more kindly employer. Frederick again ·~ft.~s--h-t...c.h,.n.~ compelled to adopt one of two organized clandestine literacy schooling for his fellow slaves. He also made his first ~-- I ~h..-.a.c-'1 · that the apostle grossly con­ attempt to flee slavery, in 1836, but the plan wa.... discovered and Frederick and his a subject of great practjcal im­ four companions were jailed. the fulfilment of the prophecy Although both lynching and sale to a deep-south plantation death trap were 1eful infringement of decency threatened, Thomas Auld decided to send Frederick back to his brother in Balli· he directions given to women, each in the congregations, had more. Hugh Auld placed Frederick in a shipyard and trained him as a caulker. local and peculiar customs, Frederick reestablished his tics with the Baltimore black community, again teaching common in religious assem­ reading and writing; he joined a debate club whose other members were free black e apostle thought inconsistent men and became engaged to Anna Murray, a free black woman. His resolve to es­ ror which they were met to- cape was still firm, and in September 1838, after a quarrel with Hugh Auld made 1ppose, will hesitate which of him again fear being sold south, Frederick fled Baltimore using borrowed seaman's ons to adopt. The subject is papers that falsely identified him a'> a free man. Anna Murray joined him in New lance. That it may claim the York, where they were married, and they then went on to New Bedford, Massachu• attention of Christians, is the setts, a seaport town where Frederick hoped 10 !ind work as a caulker. During his escape, Frederick used the surname Johnson ralher than Bailey to ! in the bonds of womanhood, help divert pursuit. Once arrived in New Bedford, however, he learned that Johnson SARAH M. GRIMKE. was an exceedingly common name among local blacks, and his host Nathan FRED l:RICK D0 ll'GI ASS 1061 ' "' l ; . :, .. ..) , ... Johnson, a black man active in abolition and assistance to fugitive slaves, suggested lellect could not remain that he take the surname Douglas, after a heroic Scottish nobleman in Sir Walter excerpts, from Douglass Scott's poem "The Lady or the Lake." Douglass agreed, although spelling the name well as lo describe it, an as a prominent Philadelphia black family spelled it. he was discovering al hi~ The racist objections of white workers prevented Douglass from fine.lingwork as On the speaker's plat a caulker, so he supported his growing family (he and Anna had five children by the advice or his white f r~- .... ~ t:~ ~ 1849) with unskilled labor on the docks. Douglass lost no time in informing himself ness against slavery, Drn about the abolitionist movement and local activism for black rights. He subscribed speech or a trace of the } F-ch-.....:of- to William Lloyd Garrison's The li'1erator, the leading abolitionist newspaper, and hard lo improve his diet began to speak on abolition and other black civil rights issues at gatherings in same time salting his sp1 African American churches in New Bedford. White abolitionist William Coffin from African-inHected st: heard him speak and invited him to attend a Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society white southern proslavef) convention held on Nantucket Island in August 1841. Herc, at Corlin's urging, and resonant, as a flexible in with white abolitionists he much admired, preeminent among them William Lloyd tenderly moving, quiet to Garrison, on the platform, Douglass gave his first speech against slavery that ad­ From very early in his dressed a large, mixed audience: white and black men and women. His account of a platform persona that h his own sufferings in slavery was so powerful that he was hired on the spot as a paid careful attention to clot~ agent of the Society to speak against slavery around New England. He moved his leagues; his face betrayec family to Lynn, Massachusetts, and never worked on the docks again, making a liv­ with people of African d ing henceforth as an orator and later as a journalist. that emphasized its Afri1 Douglass's contact with the Boston-based abolition movement was intellectually background in virtually e formative for him. An especially strong influence was William Lloyd Garrison, conspicuously as a free m whose thinking so dominated the group that they were all known as Garrisonian received no formal educat abolitionists. The chief tenets of Garrison's philosophy were that slavery was an un­ a British audience - and Christian denial of the humanity of every person, that the United States Constitution archives in the allusions, and government were un-Christian and immoral for protecting slavery, and that By his very presence al slavery's opponents should have as little to do with this evil government as pos­ rhetoric, and his autobiog 1 sible, instead attempting to abolish slavery by persuading iL<;advocates that it was was well aware of this fac morally wrong. Garrison condemned not only violent resistance to slavery but also Ironically, as Douglass political approaches to containing it. Among Garrison's colleagues whom Douglass ences to doubt that he had met in these years, and most of whom remained his lifelong friends, were free black his own words-instead I leaders Charles Lenox Remand (Douglass would name a son after him) and pare his speeches. Douglm William C. Nell, and white abolitionists Wendell Phillips, Parker Pillsbury, Abby ing, in 1845, the Narrativ Kelley (Foster), and Amy Post. Writ1e11by Himself. Slave In the next several years, Douglass traveled all over the Northeast speaking " promoted by white aboliti1 against slavery, as far west as Indiana and as far south as New York City. He ad- readers not always above r wc....\-o dressed over one hundred meetings a year, sometimes facing violent opposition (his duced by writers who cot n,.v,~si\- right hand was broken in a brawl at a meeting in Indiana and never healed prop· make known their own ht b~I~ erly), and sometimes contending with internal quarrels in the abolition movement institution. This first versic ,A,.... $~ ......... itself. Garrison, although a paternal mentor to Douglass, brooked no deviation from concentrating on his life ir his own doctrines, and he and other while abolitionists apparently wanted little the· appearance on the speaker ~c~ i .e l.oe-.,,J.
Recommended publications
  • Frederick Douglass
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection AMERICAN CRISIS BIOGRAPHIES Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph. D. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Zbe Hmcrican Crisis Biographies Edited by Ellis Paxson Oberholtzer, Ph.D. With the counsel and advice of Professor John B. McMaster, of the University of Pennsylvania. Each I2mo, cloth, with frontispiece portrait. Price $1.25 net; by mail» $i-37- These biographies will constitute a complete and comprehensive history of the great American sectional struggle in the form of readable and authoritative biography. The editor has enlisted the co-operation of many competent writers, as will be noted from the list given below. An interesting feature of the undertaking is that the series is to be im- partial, Southern writers having been assigned to Southern subjects and Northern writers to Northern subjects, but all will belong to the younger generation of writers, thus assuring freedom from any suspicion of war- time prejudice. The Civil War will not be treated as a rebellion, but as the great event in the history of our nation, which, after forty years, it is now clearly recognized to have been. Now ready: Abraham Lincoln. By ELLIS PAXSON OBERHOLTZER. Thomas H. Benton. By JOSEPH M. ROGERS. David G. Farragut. By JOHN R. SPEARS. William T. Sherman. By EDWARD ROBINS. Frederick Douglass. By BOOKER T. WASHINGTON. Judah P. Benjamin. By FIERCE BUTLER. In preparation: John C. Calhoun. By GAILLARD HUNT. Daniel Webster. By PROF. C. H. VAN TYNE. Alexander H. Stephens. BY LOUIS PENDLETON. John Quincy Adams.
    [Show full text]
  • “Blessings of Liberty” for All: Lysander Spooner's Originalism
    SECURING THE “BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY” FOR ALL: LYSANDER SPOONER’S ORIGINALISM Helen J. Knowles* ABSTRACT On January 1, 1808, legislation made it illegal to import slaves into the United States.1 Eighteen days later, in Athol, Massachusetts, Ly- sander Spooner was born. In terms of their influence on the abolition of * Assistant Professor of Political Science, State University of New York at Oswego; B.A., Liverpool Hope University College; Ph.D., Boston University. This article draws on material from papers presented at the annual meetings of the Northeastern Political Science Association and the New England Historical Association, and builds on ideas originally discussed at the Institute for Constitutional Studies (ICS) Summer Seminar on Slavery and the Constitution and an Institute for Humane Studies An- nual Research Colloquium. For their input on my arguments about Lysander Spooner’s constitutional theory, I am grateful to Nigel Ashford, David Mayers, Jim Schmidt, and Mark Silverstein. Special thanks go to Randy Barnett who, several years ago, introduced me to Spooner, the “crusty old character” (as someone once described him to me) with whom I have since embarked on a fascinating historical journey into constitutional theory. I am also indebted to the ICS seminar participants (particularly Paul Finkelman, Maeva Marcus, and Mark Tushnet) for their comments and suggestions and to the participants in the Liberty Fund workshop on Lysander Spooner’s theories (particularly Michael Kent Curtis and Larry Solum) for prompting me to think about Spooner’s work in a variety of different ways. Finally, I would like to thank the staff of the American Antiquarian Society, the Rare Books Department of the Boston Public Library, and the Houghton Library and University Archives at Harvard University for their excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • A House History
    8 Center Street “THECORNERS” Siasconset A House History Written By Betsy Tyler Designed By Eileen Powers THE NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST 2 Union Street Nantucket, Massachusetts www.nantucketpreservation.org Meerheim with new shingles,c.1889,painting by R.Way Smith Hannah B. Sharp 1885–1912 Dorothy Sharp Richmond 1912–1923 annah Sharp (1824–1912),widow of Benjamin Sharp of Philadelphia,occu- pied the house at 8 Center Street during the height of ’Sconset’sheyday as the meccaforasophisticatedbutfun-lovingsummercrowd,whohelpedtoestablish Hthe railroad, the Chapel, and the Casino.The popularity of the village led to real estate developmentnorthandsouthoftheoriginalfishinghamlet,andfilledthebighotelsand the little cottages with families from the major cities along the eastern seaboard. Hannah Sharp rented the cottage at 8 Center Street for the summer of 1885, and purchased it that September. Invitation to the hanging of the crane, 1885 Page from Meerheim guest book,1886 Hannah and her daughter, Mabel, named their cottage Meerheim, German for “ocean home,”and they kept a guest book in 1886 and 1887 that recorded visitors.The dedica- tion of Meerheim on June 28,1886,coincided with a meeting of the Nantucket Sorosis Club,aliteraryandphilosophicalsisterhoodwhoeducatedoneanotherwithdiscussions of literary topics.The Inquirer and Mirror reported the meeting: On Monday, June 28th, Sorosis was invited to meet with Mrs. Benjamin Sharp at her new cottage at Siasconset.Pleasant weather always lends inspiration to an out- of-town excursion,and this was one of the perfect days.So on the 10 o’clock train the happy band sped their way across the plain, by the placid sea, and were soon wel- comed by the kindly hostess within the cozy dwelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism in Antebellum Vermont
    Racism in Antebellum Vermont Neither Vermont’s constitutional prohibition of adult slavery nor Judge Theophilus Harrington’s famous application of that provision ever really precluded the Green Mountain State from those expressions of racism that existed all over New England and beyond. By John M. Lovejoy wo historical events appear to have established Vermont’s re- sponse to questions about slavery and the existence of racism Tin the state. The first occurred in Windsor in July 1777, when the Vermont Constitution was adopted. It was the first state constitution to declare adult slavery unlawful within its borders. The second event took place in Middlebury at the Addison County Court House in June 1804, when the Honorable Theophilus Harrington, junior member of the three- judge Supreme Court panel, speaking for the court, declared that slave ownership in Vermont could only be proved by the production in evi- dence of a bill of sale for the slave signed by Almighty God, Himself. The court’s practical application of the law prohibiting slavery set for- ever the height of the “bar” over which challengers would have to jump. From that day forward no jumpers applied. The original thirteen colonies had a substantial accumulation of laws on their books, as well as spoken and unspoken codes, relating to ne- groes, mulattos, and Indians and, in several instances, to slavery itself.1 Vermont patterned a substantial portion of its constitution after that of Pennsylvania.2 However, because Vermont lawmakers were relatively unburdened by an existing legal history and its accompanying tapestry of laws, codes, and precedent-setting opinions, the drafting of the Ver- mont Constitution was a simpler process than in most of the other states.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    j X. •f. •J-. X X SLAVERY AND THE WOMAN QUESTION" Lucretia Mott's Diary of Her Visit to Great Britain to Attend the World's Anti-Slavery Convention of 1840 EDITED BY FREDERICK B. TOLLES, Ph.D. Author of " Meeting House and Counting House, the Quaker Merchants of Colonial Philadelphia " Supplement No. 23 to the Journal of the Friends' Historical Society Published jointly by FRIENDS' HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION HAVERFORD, PENNSYLVANIA, U.S.A. (Obtainable at 302 Arch Street, Philadelphia 6, Pa. and the Friends Central Bureau, 1515 Cherry Street, Philadelphia 2, Pa.) and FRIENDS' HISTORICAL SOCIETY FRIENDS HOUSE, EUSTON ROAD, LONDON, N.W.I '952 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY HEADLEY BROTHERS LTD IOg KINGSWAY LONDON WC2 AND ASHFORD KENT Introduction WO women sat together just inside the entrance to the British Museum on a midsummer day in 1840. The Tyounger was about twenty-five years of age, short of stature, with coal-black ringlets falling about a rather full face. The other was a woman of middle age, petite in figure, with vivacious eyes and a determined chin ; her white cap, the plain bonnet on the bench beside her, her sober gown, with white kerchief across the shoulders, identified her as a member of the Society of Friends. They were engrossed in earnest conversation, oblivious to the treasures that lay about them in the world's greatest store-house of the past. From time to time, as their voices rose, a name or a phrase could be overheard : " the inward light . Elias Hicks . William Ellery Channing ... a religion of practical life .
    [Show full text]
  • “There Is Death in the Pot”: Women, Consumption, And
    “THERE IS DEATH IN THE POT”: WOMEN, CONSUMPTION, AND FREE PRODUCE IN THE TRANSATLANTIC WORLD, 1791-1848 by JULIE LYNN HOLCOMB Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON August 2010 Copyright © by Julie Holcomb 2010 All Rights Reserved To Stan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Researching and writing this dissertation has been a long journey. Fortunately, it has not been a lonely one. I am pleased to have an opportunity to recognize the many kindnesses and the valuable support received along the way. The University of Texas at Arlington provided a great environment in which to develop as a scholar. I have benefitted from the patience, generosity, and scholarship of my committee. My chair Sam W. Haynes modeled the ideal balance of academic rigor and nurturing support. I profited as well from the advice of Stephanie Cole and Christopher Morris. Words cannot begin to convey how much I appreciate my committee’s encouragement and advice throughout this process. I have also received valuable assistance from James Cotton and Robin Deeslie in the history department and Diana Hines and Rachel Robbins in the library’s interlibrary loan department. I have also had the opportunity to study at Pacific University and the University of Texas at Austin. Pacific is an incredible place to study. The small classes and equally small departments provide unparalleled opportunities for academic and personal development. I am particularly grateful to Lawrence Lipin and Alex Toth for their mentorship during my time at Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Douglass
    Frederick Douglass Charles Waddell Chesnutt Frederick Douglass Table of Contents Frederick Douglass....................................................................................................................................................1 Charles Waddell Chesnutt..............................................................................................................................1 PREFACE......................................................................................................................................................1 CHRONOLOGY............................................................................................................................................2 FREDERICK DOUGLASS...........................................................................................................................4 I......................................................................................................................................................................4 II.....................................................................................................................................................................7 III....................................................................................................................................................................8 IV...................................................................................................................................................................9 V...................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • New Bedford Aug 14/55 Dear Sir I Received a Note from You Some Two Weeks Since, and I Have Deferred Writing Ei
    New Bedford Aug 14/55 Dear Sir I received a note from you some two weeks since, and I have deferred writing either to yourself or Mr Bradburm because the people here in favor of Sunday lectures have been tardy in getting in motion. The subject had not been much canvassed prior to the receipt of your letter, and nothing definite has yet been arrived at. You are aware, I suppose that it takes time to bring about a thing of this kind. However, the prospect now is that it will be accomplished, and before many days I expect to be able to extend an invitation to Mr Bradburn to come here, or perhaps some other person will do it in my stead. I thought it most expedient to write this to you under the circumstances, especially as so long a time has elapsed since you wrote. If an invitation is extended to Mr Bradburn it will be directed to your care. You will oblige me by acquainting him with the purpose of this letter. Yours Truly E.D. Linden November Wednesday [?] 21, ’55 Dear B.: ____ about [?] us [?], ____ ____ I left Boston, if you had [?] told me what I said to you about a conversation of his with Linton, [?] of New Bedford. I told him you had work. He asked [?] a little reassured [?]. He then ____ to me, & wished to know if he should write him on the subject. I, often times ____, told him he ought. ____ the letter on the opposite side of this half=____.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpt from Eighty Years and More, by Elizabeth Cady Stanton1
    1 Excerpt from Eighty Years and More, by Elizabeth Cady Stanton1 Questions to think about: 1. Why was Cady Stanton’s attendance at the World’s Antislavery Convention in 1840 so important to her development as a women’s rights advocate? 2. How did Stanton’s life between the World’s Antislavery Convention in 1840 and the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848 deepen her commitment to women’s equal rights? 3. To what other reform issues, besides women’s rights and abolition, does Cady Stanton refer to in her autobiography? 4. How does Stanton view the Irish-Americans in her neighborhood? How do Stanton’s attitudes towards Irish-Americans reflect her middle-class, Protestant upbringing? This is Cady Stanton’s autobiography, published when she was 83 years old. In these excerpts, Elizabeth Cady Stanton looks back at the fateful events of 1840, as well as the challenges she faced trying to combine her interest in gaining greater rights for women while also being a full-time wife and mother and running a household. Our chief object in visiting England at this time was to attend the World's Anti-slavery Convention, to meet June 12, 1840, in Freemason's Hall, London. Delegates from all the anti-slavery societies of civilized nations were invited, yet, when they arrived, those representing associations of women were rejected. Though women were members of the National Anti-slavery Society, accustomed to speak and vote in all its conventions, and to take an equally active part with men in the whole anti-slavery struggle, and were there as delegates from associations of men and women, as well as those distinctively of their own sex, yet all alike were rejected because they were women.
    [Show full text]
  • Theses Digitisation: This Is a Digitised
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/30782/ Theses digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Glasgow Emancipation Society 1833-76 A Thesis presented for the degree of M. Litt At the University of Glasgow By Robert LeBaron Bingham 1973 i I I 'T k e A O 25* TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I Introduction Part I 1 Introduction P a rt II 18 Chapter II Membership of the Glasgow Emancipation Society 32 Chapter III The Development and Success of the Glasgow Emancipation Society 73 Chapter IV Discord Within the Glasgow Emancipation Society 120 Chapter V The Decade of the 1840's and the Free Church Controversy 158 Chapter VI The Final Years of the Glasgow Emancipation Society 1 96 Chapter VII Conclusion 232 Appendices : Appendix I Social, Political and Philanthropic Activities of the Members of The Glasgow Emancipation Society 255 Appendix II Delegates Appointed by The Glasgow Emancipation Society to The World Anti Slavery Convention in 1840 273 Appendix III L ist of men elected to the G.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Merrill Research Collection of William Lloyd Garrison Papers
    Walter Merrill Research Collection of William Lloyd Garrison Papers Collection Summary Title: Walter Merrill Research Collection of William Lloyd Garrison Papers Call Number: MS 91-09 Size: 17.0 linear feet Acquisition: Donated by Walter Merrill Processed By: KFS, 4-4-1991; JEF, 4-13-1998; JLY, 1-25-2001; MN, 5-26-2011 Note: Related collections: MS 73-01, Eunice McIntosh Merrill Collection of William Lloyd Garrison Papers; MS 74-06, Eunice McIntosh Merrill Collection of William Lloyd Garrison Family Papers Restrictions: Only Dr. Merrill’s writings, his research notes, or government documents included in the collection may be photocopied. Literary Rights Literary rights were not granted to Wichita State University. When permission is granted to examine manuscripts, it is not an authorization to publish them. Manuscripts cannot be used for publication without regard for common law literary rights, copyright laws and the laws of libel. It is the responsibility of the researcher and his/her publisher to obtain permission to publish. Scholars and students who eventually plan to have their work published are urged to make inquiry regarding overall restrictions on publication before initial research. Restrictions Only Dr. Merrill’s writings, his research notes, or government documents included in the collection may be photocopied. Content Note This collection consists of photocopied letters written by William Lloyd Garrison from various other repositories. These letters were collected and used by Walter Merrill during his research for the book, No Union With Slave- Holders: The Letters of William Lloyd Garrison, 1841-1849, Volume III. In addition to the letters, this collection contains Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 5-7-2016 "That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage Charles O. Boyd Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Boyd, Charles O., ""That Sublime Mingling of Races:" Abolitionist Support for Interracial Marriage." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/104 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THAT SUBLIME MINGLING OF RACES:” ABOLITIONIST SUPPORT FOR INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE by Charles Boyd Under the Direction of Wendy Venet, PhD ABSTRACT This thesis examines abolitionist support for interracial marriage. It demonstrates that far from being a marginal viewpoint within the movement, support for interracial marriage was widespread among both black and white abolitionists. Many abolitionists stated they personally did not recommend interracial marriage at present due to the backlash couples would face, while also denying that it was unnatural or immoral. A few abolitionists eschewed such a disclaimer. A few also married people of different races themselves. To a considerable extent, defense of interracial marriage was part of a larger push for racial integration and equality. This thesis also looks at British abolitionists who criticized the American stigma against interracial marriage, and children and grandchildren of abolitionists who defended interracial marriage, the most prominent being the famous, controversial lawyer, Clarence Darrow.
    [Show full text]