2001 International Piping Plover Census

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2001 International Piping Plover Census 2001 International Piping Plover Census Cheron L. Ferland Susan M. Haig U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey In cooperation with: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers iii This document should be cited as follows: Ferland, C.L. and S.M. Haig. 2002. 2001 International Piping Plover Census. U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon. 293 pp. DEDICATION This report is dedicated to the memory of Wayne Harris. For over 20 years, Wayne dedicated himself to conservation of Piping Plovers in Saskatchewan. His untimely passing leaves an important gap that will be hard to fill. We will miss him. Table of Contents Executive Summaries (English, French, Spanish) 1 Acknowledgements 7 Overview: Distribution and Abundance of Piping and Snowy Plovers in 2001 8 Methods 9 Results 10 Discussion 19 Literature Cited 25 2001 International Piping and Snowy Plover Winter Census Results 29 Winter Census Overview 30 North Carolina 31 South Carolina 35 Georgia 39 Florida 42 Alabama 57 Mississippi 62 Louisiana 67 Texas 72 Cuba 82 Puerto Rico 87 Bahamas 92 Sightings Outside the Census Window in Mexico and the Caribbean 95 iii 2001 International Piping Plover Breeding Census Results 98 – Atlantic Coast 99 Atlantic Canada Overview 100 St. Pierre and Miquelon, France 102 Newfoundland 105 Quebec 109 Nova Scotia 113 Prince Edward Island 119 New Brunswick 125 U.S. Atlantic Overview 131 Maine 133 New Hampshire 136 Massachusetts 139 Rhode Island 147 Connecticut 150 New York 153 New Jersey 159 Delaware 164 Maryland 167 Virginia 170 North Carolina 174 South Carolina 177 iv – Great Lakes 180 Great Lakes Overview 181 Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York 183 Wisconsin 188 Ontario 191 – Northern Great Plains and Prairies 195 Prairie Canada Overview 196 Alberta 198 Saskatchewan 206 Manitoba 219 U.S. Northern Great Plains Overview 223 Minnesota 225 Missouri River (MT, ND, SD, NE) 228 Montana 236 North Dakota 241 South Dakota 252 Iowa 257 Nebraska 260 Colorado 267 Kansas 271 Appendices A Key to 2001 Database Variables. 274 B Data Sheets and Guidelines for the 2001 Winter Census. 275 C Data Sheets and Guidelines for the 2001 Breeding Census. 280 D List of Cooperating Agencies and Organizations. 285 v List of Tables Table 1. Distribution and abundance of wintering Piping Plovers in 2001; 11 winter census effort. Table 2. Comparison of International Piping Plover Winter Census results 13 for 1991, 1996 and 2001. Table 3. Distribution and abundance of wintering Snowy Plovers on the Gulf 15 of Mexico, Puerto Rico and Cuba in 2001; winter census effort. Table 4. Census effort and coverage for the 2001 International Piping Plover 16 Breeding Census. Table 5. Comparison of results from the 1991, 1996, and 2001 International 18 Piping Plover Breeding Censuses. vi List of Figures Figure 1. 2001 International Piping Plover Winter Distribution Map. 12 Figure 2. 2001 International Snowy Plover Winter Distribution Map. 14 Figure 3. 2001 International Piping Plover Breeding Distribution Map. 17 Figure 4. Changes in the distribution and abundance of Piping Plovers from 1991-2001. 21 Figure 5. Piping and Snowy Plover Winter Census Distribution. 30 Figure 6. Regional Piping Plover Breeding Distribution. 98 Figure 7. Atlantic Coast Piping Plover Breeding Distribution. 99 Figure 8. Great Lakes Piping Plover Breeding Distribution. 180 Figure 9. Northern Great Plains and Prairie Canada Piping Plover Breeding Distribution. 195 vii Executive Summary Overall breeding census results indicated an 8.4% increase from 1991 estimates but only a 0.2% increase since 1996. Regional trends indicated For the third time in 10 years, an International that since 1991, the number of Piping Plovers Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) Breeding and increased on the Atlantic Coast by 78% (2,920 Winter Census was conducted throughout the birds; 12.4% since 1996) and by 80% in the Great range of the species in 2001. In addition, for the Lakes (72 birds; 50% since 1996); however first time, Snowy Plovers (C. alexandrinus), were estimates declined 15% (2,953 birds; 10% since censused as they occurred throughout the winter 1996) in Prairie Canada and the U.S. Northern range of Piping Plovers. The census effort was Great Plains. Subregional trends since 1991 coordinated via the International Piping Plover reflect a 5.5% decline in Piping Plovers in Coordination Group consisting of recovery Atlantic Canada (481 birds; 14% increase since coordinators in the major regions in which the 1996), a 66.2% increase in the U.S. Atlantic birds occur: Atlantic Canada and U.S., Great (2,430 birds; 12% since 1996), a 2.5% decline in Lakes Canada and U.S., Prairie Canada, U.S. the U.S. Northern Great Plains (1,981 birds; 24% Northern Great Plains, as well as Atlantic and increase since 1996) and a 32.4% decline in Gulf winter regions. The goal of the International Prairie Canada (972 birds; 42.4% decline since Census is to assess the current status and 1996). Even in regions with apparent increases, distribution of the species and, in conjunction results from specific states or provinces indicate with international censuses in 1996 and 1991, significant declines. For example, since 1996, provide a measure of the success of recent Piping Plovers have declined 32.7% in Quebec recovery efforts for the species. Results also and 34.2% in North Carolina. Strikingly, every indicate areas in need of additional conservation province in Prairie Canada has declined since both measures and provide baseline data for population the 1991 and 1996 censuses. models at various spatial scales. Piping Plovers are listed as endangered in Canada and in the U.S. Piping Plovers and Snowy Plovers were found in Great Lakes; they are considered threatened a variety of habitats in 2001. In winter, Piping through the remainder of their U.S. range. Snowy Plovers were found primarily on islands (73.4%) Plovers are currently listed as threatened on the and on mudflats (36.3%), sandy beaches (33.2%), Pacific Coast. and sand/salt flats (23.1%). Snowy Plovers were primarily found on islands (57.9%) and on sandy The 2001 Census resulted from the efforts of beaches (31.6%), sand/salt flats (21.4%), mudflats nearly 1,400 biologists and volunteers from 32 (21%), and gravel shores (13.3%). During U.S. States and Puerto Rico; 9 Canadian breeding, Atlantic birds were primarily seen on Provinces; St. Pierre and Miquelon, France; Cuba, barrier islands (39%), ocean fronts (37%), and and the Bahamas. Approximately 2,244 sites bays (12%); Great Lakes birds occurred more covering more than 11,836 km of shoreline often on mainland shorelines (61%) than on habitat were surveyed during census periods in islands, and on sand (54%) and mud (23%); Great January/February and May/June, 2001. During Plains/Prairie birds were found on alkali lakes the winter census, 2,389 Piping Plovers and 1,083 (34%), reservoirs (31%), and rivers (20%). Snowy Plovers were counted; 33.5% of sites surveyed (N = 352) had Piping Plovers. Of these, Recent increases on the Atlantic Coast and Great 56.8% had 10 or fewer birds present. At sites Lakes appear to be the result of intensive where Snowy Plovers were surveyed, 25.9% (N = management including extensive use of predator 255) contained Snowy Plovers and 51.5% of sites exclosures, nest monitors, captive rearing (on the occupied contained less than 11 birds. The Great Lakes), and predator control. While breeding census resulted in observation of 5,945 numbers were down in much of the U.S. Northern adults at 777 sites (N = 1,892). Over 80% of sites Great Plains, on the most significant breeding with Piping Plovers present had 10 or fewer birds. area, the Missouri River, numbers were up 1 460.4% since 1996 (1,048 birds; 67.7% since Overall, the International Piping Plover Census 1991). This increase was primarily due to represents a remarkable example of international unusually good habitat conditions from major cooperation accomplishing a tremendous flood events in 1996 and 1997 that scoured conservation need and is one of the most vegetation from breeding sites that had not been extensive endangered species census efforts in viable recently. However, the vegetation is now North America. Results of the Census represent beginning to encroach again. The most the most comprehensive population estimate for a significant decline occurred in Prairie Canada North American shorebird (N = 50 species) or any where both drought and flooding have rendered other widespread shorebird worldwide. much of the habitat unusable. However, in some cases, birds did not use sites where habitat For further information regarding the 2001 census appeared viable. Prairie Canada birds may have results, contact Susan Haig, USGS Forest and temporarily dispersed to the unusually good Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW habitat conditions on the Missouri River. Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, However, as that habitat changes and their prairie [email protected]. habitat remains poor, the loss of birds to Prairie Canada may become permanent. 2 Résumé 56,8 % de ce pourcentage, on n’a compté que 10 oiseaux ou moins. Le recensement des sites de reproduction a permis d’observer 5945 adultes En 2001, pour la troisième fois en dix ans, un dans 777 sites (1892 sites étudiés). Plus de 80 % recensement international d’hiver et un inventaire des sites où des Pluviers siffleurs ont été observés des sites de reproduction des Pluviers siffleurs comptaient 10 oiseaux ou moins. Dans (Charadrius melodus) ont été faits dans l’ensemble, les résultats du recensement des sites l’ensemble de l’aire de répartition de l’espèce. En de reproduction ont montré une augmentation de outre, pour la première fois, les Pluviers neigeux 8,4 % par rapport aux évaluations de 1991, mais (C.
Recommended publications
  • Oliver Stedman Government Center 4808 Tower Hill Road, Suite 116 Wakefield, RI 02879 401-783-3370
    Oliver Stedman Government Center 4808 Tower Hill Road, Suite 116 Wakefield, RI 02879 401-783-3370 PUBLIC NOTICE for PROPOSED RULE-MAKING and PUBLIC HEARING (*Corrected meeting time and location 10-11-2017) Proposed Amendments to the Coastal Resources Management Program Red Book Section 300.4 (650-RICR-20-00-01.3.1(D)) Pursuant to Chapter 46-23 of the State of Rhode Island General Laws, as amended, the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC) proposes to amend and take public comment on the following proposed amendments only of the Coastal Resources Management Program (CRMP): Red Book Section 300.4 - Recreational Boating Facilities (650-RICR-20-00-01.3.1(D)). Comments will not be taken on any other section of the Coastal Resources Management Program during this notice period. In accordance with the procedures of the RI Administrative Procedures Act (R.I.G.L. § 42-35) and the Rules and Regulations of the Coastal Resources Management Council, notice is hereby given of the intent of the Coastal Resources Management Council to hold a public hearing, accept public comment, and afford interested persons reasonable opportunity to submit data, views or arguments orally or in writing during the 30-day comment period and the public hearing. The public hearing will be held at *6:00p.m. on October 24, 2017 in the *Conference Room A at the Department of Administration, One Capitol Hill, Providence, RI. The room is accessible to the disabled and persons requesting interpreter services for the hearing impaired must notify the Council office at 401-783-3370 or RI 711 at least three (3) business days in advance of the hearing date so that such assistance can be provided at no cost to the person requesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 4 Program of Studies
    SOCIAL STUDIES KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12 PROGRAM RATIONALE AND PHILOSOPHY Social studies provides opportunities for students Canada’s historical and constitutional to develop the attitudes, skills and knowledge that foundations, which reflect the country’s will enable them to become engaged, active, Aboriginal heritage, bilingual nature and informed and responsible citizens. Recognition multicultural realities. A pluralistic view and respect for individual and collective identity is recognizes that citizenship and identity are shaped essential in a pluralistic and democratic society. by multiple factors such as culture, language, Social studies helps students develop their sense environment, gender, ideology, religion, of self and community, encouraging them to spirituality and philosophy. affirm their place as citizens in an inclusive, democratic society. DEFINITION OF SOCIAL STUDIES PROGRAM VISION Social studies is the study of people in relation to each other and to their world. It is an issues- The Alberta Social Studies Kindergarten to focused and inquiry-based interdisciplinary Grade 12 Program of Studies meets the needs and subject that draws upon history, geography, reflects the nature of 21st century learners. It has ecology, economics, law, philosophy, political at its heart the concepts of citizenship and identity science and other social science disciplines. in the Canadian context. The program reflects Social studies fosters students’ understanding of multiple perspectives, including Aboriginal and and involvement in practical and ethical issues Francophone, that contribute to Canada’s evolving that face their communities and humankind. realities. It fosters the building of a society that is Social studies is integral to the process of enabling pluralistic, bilingual, multicultural, inclusive and students to develop an understanding of who they democratic.
    [Show full text]
  • Meddelelser120.Pdf (2.493Mb)
    MEDDELELSER NR. 120 IAN GJERTZ & BERIT MØRKVED Environmental Studies from Franz Josef Land, with Emphasis on Tikhaia Bay, Hooker Island '-,.J��!c �"'oo..--------' MikhalSkakuj NORSK POLARINSTITUTT OSLO 1992 ISBN 82-7666-043-6 lan Gjertz and Berit Mørkved Printed J uly 1992 Norsk Polarinstitutt Cover picture: Postboks 158 Iceberg of Franz Josef Land N-1330 Oslo Lufthavn (Ian Gjertz) Norway INTRODUCTION The Russian high Arctic archipelago Franz Josef Land has long been closed to foreign scientists. The political changes which occurred in the former Soviet Union in the last part of the 1980s resulted in the opening of this area to foreigners. Director Gennady Matishov of Murmansk Marine Biological Institute deserves much of the credit for this. In 1990 an international cooperation was established between the Murmansk Marine Biological Institute (MMBI); the Arctic Ecology Group of the Institute of Oceanology, Gdansk; and the Norwegian Polar Research Institute, Oslo. The purpose of this cooperation is to develope scientific cooperation in the Arctic thorugh joint expeditions, the establishment of a high Arctic scientific station, and the exchange of scientific information. So far the results of this cooperation are two scientific cruises with the RV "Pomor", a vessel belonging to the MMBI. The cruises have been named Sov­ Nor-Poll and Sov-Nor-Po12. A third cruise is planned for August-September 1992. In addition the MMBI has undertaken to establish a scientific station at Tikhaia Bay on Hooker Island. This is the site of a former Soviet meteorological base from 1929-1958, and some of the buildings are now being restored by MMBI.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Changes in the Mississippi-Alabama Barrier Islands and the Roles of Extreme Storms, Sea Level, and Human Activities
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE MISSISSIPPI-ALABAMA BARRIER ISLANDS AND THE ROLES OF EXTREME STORMS, SEA LEVEL, AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES Robert A. Morton 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞20'0"N Horn Island 30∞20'0"N Petit Bois Island 30∞16'0"N 30∞16'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 2005 2005 1996 Dauphin Island 1996 2005 1986 1986 30∞16'0"N Kilometers 30∞14'0"N 0 1 2 3 4 5 1966 30∞16'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1950 Kilometers 1917 0 1 2 3 4 5 1917 1848 1849 30∞14'0"N 30∞14'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞10'0"N 30∞10'0"N 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W 30∞16'0"N Cat Island Ship Island 30∞16'0"N 2005 30∞14'0"N 1996 30∞14'0"N 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞14'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1917 1848 Fort 2005 Massachusetts 1995 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞12'0"N 1950 30∞12'0"N 1917 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 1848 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W Open-File Report 2007-1161 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Northeastern Beach Tiger Beetle
    Northeastern Beach Tiger Beetle, (Cincindela dorsalisdorsal/s Say) t1rtmow RECOVERY PLAN 4.- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service SFAVI ? Hadley, Massachusetts September 1994 C'AZ7 r4S \01\ Cover illustration by Katherine Brown-Wing copyright 1993 NORTHEASTERN BEACH TIGER BEETLE (Cicindela dorsalis dorsalis Say) RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by: James M. Hill and C. Barry Knisley Department of Biology Randolph-Macon College Ashland, Virginia in cooperation with the Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and members of the Tiger Beetle Recovery Planning-Group Approved: . ILL Regi Director, Region Five U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: 9 29- ~' TIGER BEETLE RECOVERY PLANNING GROUP James Hill Philip Nothnagle Route 1 Box 2746A RFD 1, Box 459 Reedville, VA Windsor, VT 05089 Judy Jacobs Steve Roble U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VA Natural Heritage Program Annapolis Field Office Main Street Station 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive 1500 East Main Street Annapolis, MD 21401 Richmond, VA 23219 C. Barry Knisley Tim Simmons Biology Department The Nature Conservancy Massachusetts Randolph-Macon College Field Office Ashland, VA 23005 79 Milk Street Suite 300 Boston, MA 02109 Laurie MacIvor The Nature Conservancy Washington Monument State Park 6620 Monument Road Middletown, MD 21769 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NORTHEASTERN BEACH TIGER BEETLE RECOVERY PLAN Current Status: This tiger beetle occurred historically "in great swarms" on beaches along the Atlantic Coast, from Cape Cod to central New Jersey, and along Chesapeake Bay beaches in Maryland and Virginia. Currently, only two small populations remain on the Atlantic Coast. The subspecies occurs at over 50 sites within the Chesapeake Bay region.
    [Show full text]
  • Piping Plover Comprehensive Conservation Strategy
    Cover graphic: Judy Fieth Cover photos: Foraging piping plover - Sidney Maddock Piping plover in flight - Melissa Bimbi, USFWS Roosting piping plover - Patrick Leary Sign - Melissa Bimbi, USFWS Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States INTER-REGIONAL PIPING PLOVER TEAM U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Melissa Bimbi U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4, Charleston, South Carolina Robyn Cobb U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2, Corpus Christi, Texas Patty Kelly U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4, Panama City, Florida Carol Aron U.S. Fish and Wildlife Region 6, Bismarck, North Dakota Jack Dingledine/Vince Cavalieri U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, East Lansing, Michigan Anne Hecht U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5, Sudbury, Massachusetts Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. Karen Terwilliger, Harmony Jump, Tracy M. Rice, Stephanie Egger Amy V. Mallette, David Bearinger, Robert K. Rose, and Haydon Rochester, Jr. Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States PURPOSE AND GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF THIS STRATEGY This Comprehensive Conservation Strategy (CCS) synthesizes conservation needs across the shared coastal migration and wintering ranges of the federally listed Great Lakes (endangered), Atlantic Coast (threatened), and Northern Great Plains (threatened) piping plover (Charadrius melodus) populations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2009 5-Year Review recommended development of the CCS to enhance collaboration among recovery partners and address widespread habitat loss and degradation, increasing human disturbance, and other threats in the piping plover’s coastal migration and wintering range.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Edward Island
    Prince Edward Island Population – 140,402 Total Area – 5,684 km2 Population Density – 24.7 people/km2 Capital (Population) – Charlottetown (58,625) Number of K-12 Schools – 64 (2007-08) Number of K-12 Students – 20,813 (2007-08) Prince Edward Island is the smallest province in Canada, joined to the mainland portion of the country by the Confederation Bridge (a 13 km long span from Borden-Carleton, Prince Edward Island to Cape Jourimain, New Brunswick). K-12 Online Learning Category Yes/No Comments Province-led programme Yes Video conferencing Other online programmes Yes Programmes from other provinces Provincial-level policy Yes Online Programmes Prince Edward Island does have a video conferencing system that is available for use for distance education, although it appears that this system receives little use for this purpose. In addition to the provincial video conferencing system, students in Prince Edward Island have the ability to access some online courses offered by the New Brunswick Ministry of Education. During the 2009-10 school year there were 11 french-language students and 23 English-language students enroled in eight online courses. Governance and Regulation There is no mention of distance education in the provincial Schools Act. However, in 2001 the Ministry of Education issued Ministerial Directive No. MD 2001-05 establishing guidelines for the use of distance education within the K-12 system. These provisions were superceded in August 2008 by Ministerial Directive No. MD 2008-05, which applies only to courses delivered during the regular school day, broadly defines distance education, and outlines a series of beliefs about the nature of distance education instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing Directions (Enroute)
    PUB. 154 SAILING DIRECTIONS (ENROUTE) ★ BRITISH COLUMBIA ★ Prepared and published by the NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Bethesda, Maryland © COPYRIGHT 2007 BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT NO COPYRIGHT CLAIMED UNDER TITLE 17 U.S.C. 2007 TENTH EDITION For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Preface 0.0 Pub. 154, Sailing Directions (Enroute) British Columbia, 0.0NGA Maritime Domain Website Tenth Edition, 2007, is issued for use in conjunction with Pub. http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/maritime 120, Sailing Directions (Planning Guide) Pacific Ocean and 0.0 Southeast Asia. Companion volumes are Pubs. 153, 155, 157, 0.0 Courses.—Courses are true, and are expressed in the same 158, and 159. manner as bearings. The directives “steer” and “make good” a 0.0 Digital Nautical Chart 26 provides electronic chart coverage course mean, without exception, to proceed from a point of for the area covered by this publication. origin along a track having the identical meridianal angle as the 0.0 This publication has been corrected to 21 July 2007, includ- designated course. Vessels following the directives must allow ing Notice to Mariners No. 29 of 2007. for every influence tending to cause deviation from such track, and navigate so that the designated course is continuously Explanatory Remarks being made good. 0.0 Currents.—Current directions are the true directions toward 0.0 Sailing Directions are published by the National Geospatial- which currents set.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Water Quality
    GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY Okefenokee Swamp, Georgia PHOTO: Kathy Methier Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update PREFACE The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) developed this document entitled “Georgia Surface Water and Groundwater Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy”. As a part of the State’s Water Quality Management Program, this report focuses on the GAEPD’s water quality monitoring efforts to address key elements identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) monitoring strategy guidance entitled “Elements of a State Monitoring and Assessment Program, March 2003”. This report updates the State’s water quality monitoring strategy as required by the USEPA’s regulations addressing water management plans of the Clean Water Act, Section 106(e)(1). Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Suite 1152, East Tower Atlanta, GA 30334 GEORGIA SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY 2015 Update TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Draft Master Plan Rev 8 Nov 28
    Manchester Master Plan DRAFT November 28, 2018 This is a working draft document and will remain so until approved and adopted by the Manchester Planning Board (anticipated in January 2019). Following the December 5, 2018 Master Plan Open House, the Master Plan Committee in coordination with the Planning Board will make any needed changes to the content of the Plan, and will format the Plan for final publication. The final Manchester Master Plan will be available on line and in the Manchester Library following adoption in early 2019. Table of Contents 1. Introduction A message from the Master Plan Committee 2. Vision & Guiding Principles Vision and Guiding Principles articulated by the community 3. Recommendations Specific Recommendations organized into a Plan for Action 4. Implementation Best practices and a financial approach to implementing recommendations Implementation Matrix (see separate document on-line) Appendix A. Existing Conditions Profiles a. Land Use b. Housing c. Economic Development d. Transportation e. Public Facilities and Services f. Open Space and Recreation g. Natural and Cultural Resources B. The Master Planning Process C. Contributing Studies, Plans and Reports 1 1. Introduction The initial goal in developing this Master Plan was to engage in an open and interactive dialogue with as broad a segment of the community as possible to assess the current state of the community, to articulate a shared vision of the future of MBTS, and to address important ideas and issues the Town will be confronting in the near future
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Route 23 on the Great Lakes with a Hundred-Acre the Largest Falls in the Lower Peninsula
    1 Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center - 5 Alpena Bi-Path 10a Paul Bunyan 10b Shinga-ba-Shores Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary The Alpena Bi-Path is a bicycle and pedestrian ichigan Dive in and explore Great Lakes maritime heritage pathway throughout the City. Bike, walk, roller lpena,M at the Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary and blade and skateboard on the 18+ miles of paved Babe was white at the time he was built in A the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center. Thunder pathway and access all the waterfront parks in 1937/38 on the hill across from the Lookout Bay was designated as a national marine sanctuary the city. The Bi-Path follows along the top of the Inn. The legend was that a white cow on a hill to protect a nationally significant collection of breakwall at the marina, allowing an unobstructed signified good luck. In 1950, new owners bought nearly 200 shipwrecks that lie in Lake Huron off the view of Lake Huron. A section follows the shore the hill and Babe was painted blue. Paul was built coast of Alpena County, Michigan. These vessels of the Thunder Bay River through the Alpena in 1953. In 2006, Paul and Babe were moved to rest in an area known as Shipwreck Alley and tell County Fairgrounds. The Bi-Path encompasses the Maritime Heritage Trail located their present location and were restored in 2007. stories of the development of the Great Lakes region and the western expansion of the along the Thunder Bay River next to the Great Lakes Maritime Heritage Center and Shinga-ba-Shores is located across US 23 from Dinosaur Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of LIGHTS and FOG SIGNALS 1St JANUARY 1896
    OF F IC .E OF 1HE Commissioner of Lights . JUN30 1908 Department of Marine it Fisheries, , ADA._ LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG-SIGNALS OS THE COASTS, RIVERS AN D LAKES OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA_ 0 F F I C CORRECTED TO THE OF THE Commissioner of Lights. 1st January, 189 J UN 30 1908 Department of Marine & Fisheries, T A. W.A., C •••1" AM A.- DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND F OTTAWA PRINTED BY S. E. DAWSON, PRINTER TO THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY • 1896 LIST OF LIGHTS AND FOG-SIGNALS ON THE COASTS, RIVERS AND LA_K ES OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA UNDER THE CHARGE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MARINE AND FISHERIES. The Lights in the Bay of Fundy and on the southern and eastern coasts of Nova Scotia, those required for the winter passage of either steamers or ice boats to Prince Edward Island, the Light on the south-west point of St. Paul Island, and all the Lights in British Columbia, are exhibited all the year round. Ail other lights under the control of the Department of Marine and Fisheries are maintained in opera- tion whenever the navigation in the vicinity is open. Lights used sole as harbour lights are not exhibited when the harbour is closed, although the general navigation may remain open. Fishing lights are main- tained only during the fishing season. In any case where there is reasonable doubt whether the light is required it is kept in operation. All the Lightships in the River St. Lawrence below Quebec leave Quebec each spring for their stations as early as ice will permit.
    [Show full text]