DOCSLIB.ORG

Piping Plover Comprehensive Conservation Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Piping Plover Comprehensive Conservation Strategy Cover graphic: Judy Fieth Cover photos: Foraging piping plover - Sidney Maddock Piping plover in flight - Melissa Bimbi, USFWS Roosting piping plover - Patrick Leary Sign - Melissa Bimbi, USFWS Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States INTER-REGIONAL PIPING PLOVER TEAM U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Melissa Bimbi U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4, Charleston, South Carolina Robyn Cobb U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2, Corpus Christi, Texas Patty Kelly U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4, Panama City, Florida Carol Aron U.S. Fish and Wildlife Region 6, Bismarck, North Dakota Jack Dingledine/Vince Cavalieri U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, East Lansing, Michigan Anne Hecht U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5, Sudbury, Massachusetts Prepared by Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. Karen Terwilliger, Harmony Jump, Tracy M. Rice, Stephanie Egger Amy V. Mallette, David Bearinger, Robert K. Rose, and Haydon Rochester, Jr. Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States PURPOSE AND GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF THIS STRATEGY This Comprehensive Conservation Strategy (CCS) synthesizes conservation needs across the shared coastal migration and wintering ranges of the federally listed Great Lakes (endangered), Atlantic Coast (threatened), and Northern Great Plains (threatened) piping plover (Charadrius melodus) populations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2009 5-Year Review recommended development of the CCS to enhance collaboration among recovery partners and address widespread habitat loss and degradation, increasing human disturbance, and other threats in the piping plover’s coastal migration and wintering range. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill further increased concerns regarding piping plover conservation in the nonbreeding portion of the range. This CCS provides a unified summary of the biology, habitat, and threats to nonbreeding piping plovers. It also identifies the planning, coordination, protection, and research actions needed to reduce threats to nonbreeding piping plovers and their habitat. The CCS is intended to serve as an integrated resource for biologists, land managers, regulators, and others seeking to conserve nonbreeding piping plovers. The primary geographic focus of this CCS is the U.S. coastal nonbreeding range of the piping plover from North Carolina to Texas. While we recognize that piping plover protection in Mexico and the Caribbean is very important, this document only provides cursory information about the non-U.S. wintering range. Piping plover conservation actions in other countries are strongly encouraged, and parallel planning documents may be warranted. Current information indicates that piping plovers do not concentrate in large numbers or make extended stopovers at inland migration sites outside of their breeding range. Conservation planning for inland migration habitats, currently considered a lower priority, can be re- evaluated if existing or foreseeable threats during inland migration are identified. RELATIONSHIP OF THIS STRATEGY TO RECOVERY PLANS Implementation of actions described in this CCS will support attainment of relevant reclassification and delisting criteria contained in approved USFWS piping plover recovery plans (USFWS 1988b, 1996, 2003). The pertinent recovery plan tasks are listed in the introduction to each recommended action in this strategy. Information summarized in this document may also inform improvement of criteria in future recovery plan revisions, including the revised recovery plan for the Northern Great Plains population (in progress in 2012). Likewise, experience with implementation of actions associated with the CCS may guide updated estimates of time and cost to achieve reclassification or delisting in the future. Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its i Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Hundreds of biologists from all levels of government, non-governmental organizations, and academic institutions, as well as unaffiliated individuals have provided important information reflected in this conservation strategy. Although they are too many to name individually, we cannot overstate the value of their generous contributions. We also recognize the collective on-going efforts to conserve piping plovers throughout their range. * * * DISCLAIMER: This document describes actions to address threats and conservation needs for piping plovers. It does not obligate any party to undertake specific actions and may not represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in piping plover recovery. NOTICE OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL: Permission to use copyrighted images in this document has been granted by the copyright holders. These images are not placed in the public domain by their appearance herein. They may not be copied or otherwise reproduced, except in their printed context within this document, without the written consent of the copyright holder. Recommended citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012. Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States. East Lansing, Michigan. An electronic copy of this document is available at: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/EastLansing/ ii Comprehensive Conservation Strategy for the Piping Plover in its Coastal Migration and Wintering Range in the Continental United States TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND GEOGRAPHIC SCOPE OF THIS STRATEGY .............................................................. i RELATIONSHIP OF THIS STRATEGY TO RECOVERY PLANS ........................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................ ii DISCLAIMER .............................................................................................................................................. ii NOTICE OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL ............................................................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. iii PART I: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY, AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF NONBREEDING PIPING PLOVERS ........................ 4 Description ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Temporal and Spatial Distribution ................................................................................................... 4 Survival ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Habitat Use ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Winter Site Fidelity ........................................................................................................................ 11 Intra- and Inter-specific Interactions .............................................................................................. 12 KEY THREATS TO PIPING PLOVERS IN THEIR COASTAL MIGRATION AND WINTERING RANGE.............. 13 Loss, Modification, and Degradation of Habitat ................................................................................. 13 Development and Construction ...................................................................................................... 13 Dredging and Sand Mining ............................................................................................................ 16 Inlet Stabilization and Relocation .................................................................................................. 19 Groins ............................................................................................................................................. 21 Seawalls and Revetments ............................................................................................................... 22 Sand Placement Projects ................................................................................................................. 23 Loss of Macroinvertebrate Prey Base due to Shoreline Stabilization ............................................ 25 Invasive Vegetation ........................................................................................................................ 27 Wrack Removal and Beach Cleaning ............................................................................................. 28 Accelerating Sea Level Rise and other Climate Change Impacts ........................................................ 29 Weather events..................................................................................................................................... 31 Storm Events .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Changes in the Mississippi-Alabama Barrier Islands and the Roles of Extreme Storms, Sea Level, and Human Activities
    HISTORICAL CHANGES IN THE MISSISSIPPI-ALABAMA BARRIER ISLANDS AND THE ROLES OF EXTREME STORMS, SEA LEVEL, AND HUMAN ACTIVITIES Robert A. Morton 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞20'0"N Horn Island 30∞20'0"N Petit Bois Island 30∞16'0"N 30∞16'0"N 30∞18'0"N 30∞18'0"N 2005 2005 1996 Dauphin Island 1996 2005 1986 1986 30∞16'0"N Kilometers 30∞14'0"N 0 1 2 3 4 5 1966 30∞16'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1950 Kilometers 1917 0 1 2 3 4 5 1917 1848 1849 30∞14'0"N 30∞14'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 30∞10'0"N 30∞10'0"N 88∞46'0"W 88∞44'0"W 88∞42'0"W 88∞40'0"W 88∞38'0"W 88∞36'0"W 88∞34'0"W 88∞32'0"W 88∞30'0"W 88∞28'0"W 88∞26'0"W 88∞24'0"W 88∞22'0"W 88∞20'0"W 88∞18'0"W 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W 30∞16'0"N Cat Island Ship Island 30∞16'0"N 2005 30∞14'0"N 1996 30∞14'0"N 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞14'0"N 1950 30∞14'0"N 1917 1848 Fort 2005 Massachusetts 1995 1986 Kilometers 1966 0 1 2 3 30∞12'0"N 1950 30∞12'0"N 1917 30∞12'0"N 30∞12'0"N 1848 89∞10'0"W 89∞8'0"W 89∞6'0"W 89∞4'0"W 88∞58'0"W 88∞56'0"W 88∞54'0"W 88∞52'0"W Open-File Report 2007-1161 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. President's Committee for Hungarian Refugee Relief
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS U.S. PRESIDENT’S COMMITTEE FOR HUNGARIAN REFUGEE RELIEF: Records, 1957 A67-4 Compiled by Roland W. Doty, Jr. William G. Lewis Robert J. Smith 16 cubic feet 1956-1957 September 1967 INTRODUCTION The President’s Committee for Hungarian Refugee Relief was established by the President on December 12, 1956. The need for such a committee came about as a result of the United States’ desire to take care of its fair share of the Hungarians who fled their country beginning in October 1956. The Committee operated until May, 1957. During this time, it helped re-settle in the United States approximately 30,000 refugees. The Committee’s small staff was funded from the Special Projects Group appropriation. In its creation, the Committee was assigned the following duties and objectives: a. To assist in every way possible the various religious and other voluntary agencies engaged in work for Hungarian Refugees. b. To coordinate the efforts of these agencies, with special emphasis on those activities related to resettlement of the refugees. The Committee also served as a focal point to which offers of homes and jobs could be forwarded. c. To coordinate the efforts of the voluntary agencies with the work of the interested governmental departments. d. It was not the responsibility of the Committee to raise money. The records of the President’s Committee consists of incoming and outgoing correspondence, press releases, speeches, printed materials, memoranda, telegrams, programs, itineraries, statistical materials, air and sea boarding manifests, and progress reports. The subject areas of these documents deal primarily with requests from the public to assist the refugees and the Committee by volunteering homes, employment, adoption of orphans, and even marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Restoration Strategy Funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation – Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Restoration Strategy Funded by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation – Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Prepared with assistance from Abt Associates January 2018 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ V Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ......................................................................................VI Executive Summary .............................................................................................................VII 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 National Fish and Wildlife Foundation—Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Background .......................1 1.1.1 GEBF Funding Priorities ...............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Restoration Strategy ..................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Geography ........................................................................................................................................................3 1.2.2 Watershed Approach .....................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches
    Animals 2013, 3, 1002-1020; doi:10.3390/ani3041002 OPEN ACCESS animals ISSN 2076-2615 www.mdpi.com/journal/animals Article Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches Grainne S. Maguire 1,*, James M. Rimmer 2 and Michael A. Weston 3 1 BirdLife Australia, Suite 2-05, The Green Building, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia 2 Barwon Coast, Ewing Blyth Drive, Barwon Heads, VIC 3227, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Centre for Integrative Ecology, Faculty of Science, Engineering and the Built Environment, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-393-470-757. Received: 28 August 2013; in revised form: 21 October 2013 / Accepted: 21 October 2013 / Published: 24 October 2013 Simple Summary: Coastal urbanisation brings humans into contact with beach-dwelling wildlife. Where wildlife are disturbance prone, active management is required to promote coexistence between beach-goers and endangered wildlife. Coexistence relies on people adopting wildlife-sensitive behaviours. This study examines factors, which influence people’s awareness and perceptions of threatened species management in southern Australia, using Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis management as a model. The inconvenience experienced by beach goers in regard to plover management was low. Awareness and support for plover conservation were high. Frequency of beach use, whether a person was a dog walker, and awareness of the species and its plight, influenced perceptions. Abstract: We surveyed 579 recreationists regarding management of the threatened, beach-dwelling Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Resource and Activity Guide
    Educator Resource and Activity Guide introduction The Gulf Islands National Seashore is a protected region of barrier islands along the Gulf of Mexico and features historic resources and recreational opportunities spanning a 12-unit park in Florida and Mississippi. The Mississippi section encompasses Cat Island, Petit Bois Island, Horn Island, East and West Ship Islands, and the Davis Bayou area. Barrier islands, long and narrow islands made up of sand deposits created by waves and currents, run parallel to the coast line and serve to protect the coast from erosion. They also provide refuge for wildlife by harboring their habitats. From sandy-white beaches to wildlife sanctuaries, Mississippi’s wilderness shore is a natural and historic treasure. This guide provides an introduction to Ship Island, including important people, places, and events, and also features sample activities for usage in elementary, middle and high school classrooms. about the documentary The Gulf Islands: Mississippi’s Wilderness Shore is a Mississippi Public Broadcasting production showcasing the natural beauty of The Gulf Islands National Seashore Park, specifically the barrier islands in Mississippi – Cat Island, East and West Ship Islands, Horn Island, and Petit Bois Island – and the Davis Bayou area in Ocean Springs. The Gulf Islands National Seashore Park stretches 160 miles from Cat Island to the Okaloosa area near Fort Walton, Florida. The Gulf Islands documentary presents the islands’ history, natural significance, their role to protect Mississippi’s coast from hurricanes and the efforts to further protect and restore them. horn island in mississippi -2- ship island people n THE HISTORY -3- Ship Island, Mississippi has served as a crossroads through 300 years of American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Okaloosa County 136 S
    OKALOOSA COUNTY 136 S. Bronough Street 800 N. Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1100 1580 Waldo Palmer Lane, Suite 1 A message from Governor Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Orlando, Florida 32803 Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Scott on the future of (407) 956-5600 (850) 921-1119 Florida’s Freight and Trade FREIGHT & LOGISTICS OVERVIEW FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FDOT CONTACTS Ananth Prasad, P.E. Richard Biter Secretary of Transportation Assistant Secretary for Intermodal Phone (850) 414-5205 Systems Development [email protected] Phone (850) 414-5235 [email protected] Juan Flores Tommy Barfield Administrator, Freight Logistics & District 3, Secretary Passenger Operations Phone (850) 415-9200 Phone (850) 414-5245 [email protected] [email protected] Federal Legislative Contacts United States Senate Bill Nelson Phone (202) 224-5274 United States Senate Marco Rubio Phone (202) 224-3071 US House of Representatives District 1, Jeff Miller Phone (202) 225-4136 State Legislative Contacts: Florida Senate District 1, Greg Evers Phone (850) 487-5001 Florida Senate District 2, Don Gaetz Phone (850) 487-5002 Florida House of Representatives FDOT MISSION: District 3, Doug Broxson Phone (850) 717-5003 THE DEPARTMENT WILL PROVIDE A SAFE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT ENSURES THE MOBILITY OF PEOPLE AND GOODS, ENHANCES ECONOMIC PROSPERITY AND Florida House of Representatives District 4, Matt Gaetz PRESERVES THE QUALITY OF OUR ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES. Phone (850) 717-5004 In recognition of the significant role that freight HB599 requires FDOT to lead the development of mobility plays as an economic driver for the state, a plan to “enhance the integration and connectivity an Office of Freight, Logistics and Passenger of the transportation system across and between Operations has been created at FDOT.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Restoration Improves Western Snowy Plover Nest Survival
    research paper Wader Study 127(2): 130–140. doi:10.18194/ws.00199 Habitat restoration improves Western Snowy Plover nest survival Katelyn M. Raby* & Mark A. Colwell Wildlife Department, Humboldt State University, 1 Harpst Street, Arcata, CA 95521, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Raby, K.M. & M.A. Colwell. 2020. Habitat restoration improves Western Snowy Plover nest survival. Wader Study 127(2): 130–140. Productivity measures, such as nest survival rates, are often used to indirectly Keywords assess habitat quality and guide management practices for conservation of Charadrius nivosus threatened and endangered species. The Western Snowy Plover Charadrius nivosus nivosus is listed as threatened due to three limiting factors: human disturbance, habitat quality increasing native and introduced predator populations, and the loss and degra- productivity dation of habitat. We examined the relative influence of these three limiting factors on nest survival, using 14 years of data (n = 610 nests) at eight sites in conservation Humboldt County, California, USA. Survival varied by year and site, and increased predation with nest age and as the breeding season progressed. Habitat restoration had human disturbance the greatest influence on nest survival. Both natural (tidal overwash) and human- implemented restoration had a positive effect on nest survival, whereas unre- shorebirds stored areas had a negative effect. Naturally restored areas had a stronger effect waders (higher and less variable survival estimates) on nest survival than human-restored threatened areas. Human and predator activity were not strong predictors of nest survival. Consequently, we recommend that managers focus on conserving, maintaining, and creating restoration areas to enhance Snowy Plover nest survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 No. 142 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was tion, and that’s despite fits and starts now seen is a health care clinic in called to order by the Speaker pro tem- with government health and so forth. Johnson Bayou, where the community pore (Ms. HIRONO). It’s the individuals, local officials, fam- came together to put this in place to f ilies on the ground that made the dif- create access for health care. ference. You know, we all talk about how all DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO This storm also caused unprece- politics is local, but I would submit TEMPORE dented damage to the oil and gas indus- that all health care is local. If we don’t The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- try. Again, individuals working in have access to health care, it doesn’t fore the House the following commu- those companies got our oil and gas in- matter. It doesn’t matter what’s avail- nication from the Speaker: frastructure back up and running in able in Boston, Massachusetts, or in record time, so that we could fuel San Francisco and New York, because WASHINGTON, DC, if the folks down in Johnson Bayou September 24, 2007. America’s energy needs. I hereby appoint the Honorable MAZIE K. At the Federal level, funds have been don’t have access to health care, then HIRONO to act as Speaker pro tempore on appropriated for assistance, but they what good is it? What good is the great this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Sound and the Gulf Islands
    Mississippi Sound and the Gulf Islands By Cynthia A. Moncreiff1 Background effects of human activities in the coastal marine environment. These activities include historical commercial uses and Seagrasses in Mississippi Sound were likely first present-day recreational uses of seagrass habitat in addition documented by H.J. Humm (1956), though there are earlier to a number of other factors which may directly or indirectly descriptions of marine angiosperms associated with the barrier impact seagrasses. Development may be a major factor, as islands of Louisiana and Mississippi (Loyd and Tracy, 1901). it often results in higher sediment loads, introductions of Prior to Humm’s work, it was believed that seagrasses, with contaminants, and elevated nutrient levels, which all can the exception of wigeon grass (Ruppia maritima), occurred contribute to a loss of water quality, thus affecting seagrass only very rarely between Bay County, Fla., and Aransas communities (see watershed of area in fig. 1). County, Tex. (Thorne, 1954). Humm (1956) described Land use and land-use changes in the eight watersheds extensive beds of seagrasses along the northern margins feeding into the Mississippi Sound which may have an effect of Mississippi’s barrier islands, dominated by turtle grass on seagrass resources include (1) a shift from the historical (Thalassia testudinum), and indicated that turtle grass was the focus on agriculture and forestry for the paper and lumber dominant seagrass in Mississippi Sound. He also documented industries to urban development related to the casino industry the presence of manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme), and (2) a shift in the State’s focus to port development, shoal grass (Halodule wrightii), and star grass (Halophila plastics, and chemicals as regional industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Islands PWC Environmental Assesment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Gulf Islands National Seashore Florida/Mississippi GULF ISLANDS NATIONAL SEASHORE Personal Watercraft Use Environmental Assessment Printed on recycled paper National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Gulf Islands National Seashore Florida/Mississippi GULF ISLANDS NATIONAL SEASHORE Personal Watercraft Use Environmental Assessment March 2004 SUMMARY Gulf Islands National Seashore was established in 1971, “In order to preserve for public use and enjoyment certain areas possessing outstanding natural, historic and recreational values…” The seashore stretches approximately 160 miles from Cat Island in Mississippi to the eastern tip of Santa Rosa Island in Florida. There are snowy-white beaches, sparkling blue waters, fertile coastal marshes, and dense maritime forests. Visitors can explore 19th century forts, enjoy shaded picnic areas, hike on winding nature trails, and camp in comfortable campgrounds. In addition, Horn and Petit Bois islands located in Mississippi are federally designated wilderness areas. Nature, history, and recreational opportunities abound in this national treasure. All areas of Gulf Islands National Seashore in the Florida District and the Davis Bayou area in the Mississippi District are reachable from Interstate 10. The Mississippi District barrier islands are only accessible by boat. The purpose of and the need for taking action is to evaluate a range of alternatives and strategies for managing personal watercraft (PWC) use at Gulf Islands National Seashore to ensure the protection of park resources and values while offering recreational opportunities as provided for in the national seashore’s enabling legislation, purpose, mission, and goals. Upon completion of this process, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Park Service (NPS) may either take action to adopt special regulations to manage PWC use, or it may not reinstate PWC use at this park unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinornis Rubricollis Tregellasi (Hooded Plover (Western)) (Mathews, 1912) (Garnett Et Al., 2011)
    The Minister decided this species was not eligible for listing as threatened on 20 October 2014. Conservation Advice Thinornis rubricollis tregellasi hooded plover (western) Taxonomy The hooded plover is generally accepted as Thinornis rubricollis (Christian, 1992). Previously placed under the genus Charadrius (Gmelin, 1789) (Marchant & Higgins, 1993; Christidis & Boles, 2008). The re-classification of the genus was not without contention, and there is some debate over which species name, rubricollis or the historical cucullatus, should be used (Christidis & Boles, 2008). While general usage follows rubricollis (Christidis & Boles, 2008; Garnett et al., 2011) some texts use cucullatus (e.g. Clements, 2000). Two subspecies are recognised by Birdlife Australia: Thinornis rubricollis rubricollis (hooded plover (eastern)) (Mathews, 1912) and Thinornis rubricollis tregellasi (hooded plover (western)) (Mathews, 1912) (Garnett et al., 2011). The subspecies’ occupy separate, non- overlapping regions of Australia’s southern coasts, and exhibit slight plumage and morphological differences as well as differences in ecology and habitat (Marchant & Higgins, 1993). The western form is also found inland in Western Australia, in addition to its coastal distribution. Conservation status Not threatened. Species can also be listed as threatened under state and territory legislation. For information on the listing status of this subspecies under relevant state or territory legislation, see http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/sprat.pl. Reasons for conservation assessment by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee This advice follows assessment of information provided by a committee nomination based on information provided in the Action Plan for Australian Birds 2010 (Garnett et al., 2011), as developed by Birdlife Australia. Description The hooded plover is a stocky, medium-sized wading bird about 20 cm long and approximately 100 g in weight.
    [Show full text]