DOCSLIB.ORG

**** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders Or Unexpected Email

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Scott.A.Milkey From: Hudson, MK <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:23 PM To: Powell, David N;Landis, Larry (llandis@ );candacebacker@ ;Miller, Daniel R;Cozad, Sara;McCaffrey, Steve;Moore, Kevin B;[email protected];Mason, Derrick;Creason, Steve;Light, Matt ([email protected]);Steuerwald, Greg;Trent Glass;Brady, Linda;Murtaugh, David;Seigel, Jane;Lanham, Julie (COA);Lemmon, Bruce;Spitzer, Mark;Cunningham, Chris;McCoy, Cindy;[email protected];Weber, Jennifer;Bauer, Jenny;Goodman, Michelle;Bergacs, Jamie;Hensley, Angie;Long, Chad;Haver, Diane;Thompson, Lisa;Williams, Dave;Chad Lewis;[email protected];Andrew Cullen;David, Steven;Knox, Sandy;Luce, Steve;Karns, Allison;Hill, John (GOV);Mimi Carter;Smith, Connie S;Hensley, Angie;Mains, Diane;Dolan, Kathryn Subject: Indiana EBDM - June 22, 2016 Meeting Agenda Attachments: June 22, 2016 Agenda.docx; Indiana Collaborates to Improve Its Justice System.docx **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** Dear Indiana EBDM team members – A reminder that the Indiana EBDM Policy Team is scheduled to meet this Wednesday, June 22 from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC. At your earliest convenience, please let me know if you plan to attend the meeting. Attached is the meeting agenda. Please note that we have a full agenda as this is the team’s final Phase V meeting. We have much to discuss as we prepare the state’s application for Phase VI. We will serve box lunches at about noon so we can make the most of our time together. Work group chairs: Please be prepared to present your work group’s logic model to the full state team. If you have not yet done so, please send me an electronic copy of your logic model by the end of the day tomorrow so I may have copies available for the team. As part of our state level communication strategy, the Supreme Court, IPAC, Office of the Governor, and Representative Steuerwald issued a media advisory today about Wednesday’s meeting (see attached). We have had a couple of inquiries about the agenda, so it is possible that we will have media at the meeting for at least part of the day. Thank you and I look forward to seeing you on Wednesday! Mary Kay Hudson Deputy Director Judicial Center / Division of State Court Administration 30 South Meridian Street, Suite 900 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Media Advisory: June 22 criminal justice improvement meeting A wide-range of organizations and government agencies are meeting June 22 to continue efforts to improve Indiana’s criminal justice system. Police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges, probation officers, corrections officials, mental health experts, and community members are coming together to create a safer and healthier Indiana. Indiana Judicial Center 30 S. Meridian, Suite 900 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. The meeting is part of a continued effort by local and state leaders to reduce Indiana’s crime rate, reduce recidivism, ensure a fair and just criminal justice system, and ensure decisions are driven by data. A grant from the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) is paying for the effort. NIC provides assistance to states seeking meaningful reforms to their justice systems. Six counties (Bartholomew, Hamilton, Hendricks, Jefferson, Porter, and Tipton) volunteered to participate in a study as part of the effort which is nationally known as Evidence Based Decision Making (EBDM). EBDM is the practice of using research to guide decisions across the justice system. A state policy team leads the effort and is chaired by Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David and vice-chair Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council Executive Director David Powell. For press inquiries contact Supreme Court Chief Public Information Officer Kathryn Dolan at [email protected]; IPAC Public Information Officer Connie Smith at [email protected]; State Rep. Greg Steuerwald's Press Secretary Peter Hoffman at [email protected]; or Governor Mike Pence’s Press Secretary Kara Brooks at [email protected]. Indiana EBDM Policy Team Meeting June 22, 2016 9:00 am – 4:00 pm Indiana Judicial Center, Suite 900 MEETING AGENDA Meeting Goals: Review and revise work group logic models Develop Indiana’s EBDM scorecard Draft a cooperative agreement between EBDM and the Justice Reinvestment Advisory Council Discuss and begin to develop the state and local teams’ communication plan and public outreach strategies Develop process for providing team input on the Phase VI application 1. Welcome and Review Meeting Goals 2. Work Group Logic Model Presentations a. Data b. Professional Development c. Mental Health d. Behavioral Responses e. Risk Reduction Strategies 3. Discussion: Indiana EBDM Scorecard a. State team scorecard b. Logic model outcomes c. Defining recidivism across decision points 4. Discussion: EBDM and Justice Reinvestment Advisory Council - Cooperative Agreement 5. Discussion: State and Local Communications Plan and Public Relations Strategy 6. Phase VI Application Update – Due Date July 29, 2016 7. Next steps 8. Adjourn Next Meeting Date: September 21, 2016 9:00 am – 4:00 pm at IJC Scott.A.Milkey From: Gilson, Katie Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 8:30 AM To: Ahearn, Mark;Anderson, Christopher M;Atterholt, Jim;Bailey, Brian (OMB);Bauer, Zachary C;Bradford, Cale A;Brookes, Brady;Brooks, Kara D;Bullock, Meredith;Craig, Lindsey M;Czarniecki, Cary (Lani);Davis, Bridget M (GOV);Espich, Jeff;Evans, Benjamin P (GOV);Fernandez, Marilyn;Ferrell, Curtis L (GOV);Fritz, Pam (GOV);Hill, John (GOV);Hodgin, Stephanie;Jarmula, Ryan L;Johnson, David;Johnson, Matt (GOV);Kane, Kristen;Karns, Allison;Lloyd, Matthew;Mantravadi, Adarsh V;McGrath, Danielle;Morales, Cesar (Diego);Neal, Michael;Pavlik, Jennifer L;Pitcock, Josh;Price, Kendra;Reed, Katie;Rusthoven, Mark;Schilb, Veronica J;Schlake, Josh;Schmidt, Daniel W;Triol, Shelley;Vincent, Micah;Wall, Kathryn E;Whitaker, Steve;Duncan, Emily (LG);Heater, Ryan;Goodwin, Nicholas R;Mcadam, Justin L;McGuffee, Tyler Ann;Tuggle, Jennifer;Parr, Riley;Kenney, Benjamin E;Badger, Benjamin J;Frain, Samuel J;Hall, Adriana;Hall, Jordan D;King, Michael C;Duncan, Emily (LG) Subject: [Gov Clips] Howey Attachments: 6-10-16 HPI Daily.pdf Katie Gilson, Staff Assistant Office of Governor Mike Pence [email protected] Phone: (317) 232-1198 Fax: (317) 232-3443 June 10, 2016 HPI Daily Wire sponsored by Associated Builders & Contractors Friday, June 10, 2016 7:44 AM GOP PREPARES TO PASS MARRIAGE PLATFORM: A year after same-sex marriage became legal across the nation, Indiana Republicans appear poised to maintain support for marriage “between a man and a woman” in the state party’s platform (Schneider,IndyStar). Delegates to the Indiana Republican Convention on Saturday in Indianapolis will vote on the platform, along with choosing a nominee for state attorney general and schools chief. Ahead of the gathering, a committee tasked with exploring changes to the platform voted not to revise language favoring traditional marriage that party members added in 2014. It states, “We believe that strong families, based on marriage between a man and a woman, are the foundation of society.” Opponents of the language still have opportunities to alter it. A second committee, whose membership includes influential party members, will meet Friday where changes — although unexpected — could occur before nearly 1,700 delegates vote on the platform Saturday. Advocates of maintaining the provision say it constitutes a compromise struck two years ago, where language also was included to support “diverse” family structures. But those who want the “between a man and a woman” definition removed, such as former Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard and new Marion County GOP Chairman Mike McQuillen, argue it’s time for a more inclusive party. Megan Robertson, a leader in the effort to remove the language, said Republicans have an opportunity to show the party is welcoming and diverse. “Instead of recognizing it as an opportunity, it was seen as ‘We don’t want to talk about this issue. We don’t want to bring it up, so let’s not change anything on it,' ” said Robertson, a LGBT rights activist and member of Enterprise Republicans, a group chaired by former Angie’s List CEO Bill Oesterle. Oesterle, a critic of Pence, left the tech firm last year to promote gay and transgender rights after the passage of the controversial Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Serving as a backdrop to the debate is the city’s annual Indy Pride Festival that’s occurring in Indianapolis the same day as the state Republican convention. The festival, which supports the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, is expected to draw more than 100,000 people to Downtown Indianapolis. Indiana Republican Party Chairman Jeff Cardwell said the language received overwhelming support at the 2014 state convention. “It passed with better than 80 percent of people that participated the last time around. So nothing has changed at all. I think it will be fine,” Cardwell said. 4-WAY RACE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL: With a party platform to approve, along with an attorney general and state superintendent races to vote on, Saturday could be a long day for delegates at the Indiana State Republican Convention (Osowski, Evansville Courier & Press). There are four candidates for the Republican nominee for attorney general. Instead of a primary, candidates for statewide elected offices such as attorney general or state superintendent, are picked by delegates at state conventions. Hoosier voters choose an overall winner in November. This year, with current Attorney General Greg Zoeller choosing not to seek re-election, former attorney general Steve Carter, State Sen. Randy Head of Logansport, Elkhart County Prosecutor Curtis Hill and assistant attorney general Abby Kuzma are all vying for the open position. Carter was attorney general for eight years, serving from 2001 to 2009.
Recommended publications

  • DOCUMENY RESUME CG 016 510 White House Conference on Aging

    DOCUMENY RESUME ED 227 382 CG 016 510 TITLE White House Conference on Aging (Washington, D.C., November 30-December 3, 1981). Final Report. VOlume, 2: Process Proceedings. INSTfTUTION Whitellouse Conference on Aging, Washington, D..C. SPONS AGENCY Department of Health and Human $ervices, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 81 NOTE 141p.; For related documents, see tD-215257-269 And CG 016 509-511. - PUB TYPE Collected Works - ConIerence,Proceedings (021) -- Reports - General (140 . EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 PlUs.Postage. DESCRIp7ORS Aging (Individuals); Committees; Conferendes; *Economic Climate; *Federal Legislation; Gerontology; *Governthent Role; History; Human ServiCes; *Older Adults; Quality of Life; Retirement IDENTIFIERS *White House Conference on Aging ABSTRACT This secopd volume of the final report of the 1981 White House Conference on Aging.presents a historicaloverview of the Conference, tracing its history from its indeption as ajoin' resolution in Congress in 1979 through 'thenationwide preparatory activities, to its culmination with the gathering of delegates and observers in late November of 1981. Previous conferences areoutlined , and the eConomic climate at the time of the 1981Conferenc'e is .described. Enabling legislation and early preparations forthe conferenca are reviewed, and the conference processis described in detail. The texts of welcothing speeches and keynotead-dresses to the Conference delegates are also presented. Reports of the14 Conference' committeesare sumniarized. The appendices present the text ofthe 1981 White House Conference on Aging Act andprovide,lists of the . National Advisory Committee, the state-White House Confekence on ,Aging coordinatOrs, state Wbite House Conferences onAging, the technical committees, the mini-confeiences,_delegates,observers, international observers, official rules of procedure, Conference committee leadership, and the 1981 White House Conference onAging staff.
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics (and Related Projects) Berlet, C. (2017). Hayek, Mises, and the Iron Rule of Unintended Consequences. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part IX: Te Divine Right of the ‘Free’ Market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Farrant, A., & McPhail, E. (2017). Hayek, Tatcher, and the Muddle of the Middle. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A Collaborative Biography Part IX the Divine Right of the Market. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Filip, B. (2018a). Hayek on Limited Democracy, Dictatorships and the ‘Free’ Market: An Interview in Argentina, 1977. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIII: ‘Fascism’ and Liberalism in the (Austrian) Classical Tradition. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Filip, B. (2018b). Hayek and Popper on Piecemeal Engineering and Ordo- Liberalism. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIV: Orwell, Popper, Humboldt and Polanyi. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Friedman, M. F. (2017 [1991]). Say ‘No’ to Intolerance. In R. Leeson & C. Palm (Eds.), Milton Friedman on Freedom. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s) 2019 609 R. Leeson, Hayek: A Collaborative Biography, Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78069-6 610 Bibliography Glasner, D. (2018). Hayek, Gold, Defation and Nihilism. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek a Collaborative Biography Part XIII: ‘Fascism’ and Liberalism in the (Austrian) Classical Tradition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Goldschmidt, N., & Hesse, J.-O. (2013). Eucken, Hayek, and the Road to Serfdom. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A Collaborative Biography Part I Infuences, from Mises to Bartley.
  • In the Indiana Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-MI-02991 Brief Of

    In the Indiana Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-MI-02991 Brief Of

    Received: 2/29/2020 11:08 PM In the Indiana Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-MI-02991 Indiana Family Institute, Inc.; Indiana Family Ac- tion, Inc.; and The American Family Association of Indiana; Plaintiffs-Appellants v. The City of Carmel, Indiana; City Attorney for the Appeal from the City of Carmel, Indiana; Douglas Haney, in his offi- Hamilton County Superior Court 1 cial capacity as City Attorney for the City of Carmel, Indiana; The City of Indianapolis-Marion County, Case No. 29D01-1512-MI-010207 Indiana; The City of Indianapolis-Marion County Equal Opportunity Advisory Board; The City of Hon. Michael A. Casati, Judge Bloomington, Indiana; The City of Bloomington Human Rights Commission; The City of Columbus, Indiana; The City of Columbus Human Rights Commission; The State of Indiana; Attorney Gen- eral Curtis Hill, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Indiana; Defendants-Appellees Brief of Appellant American Family Association of Indiana James Bopp, Jr. Lead Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellants [email protected] Richard E. Coleson [email protected] Melena S. Siebert [email protected] The Bopp Law Firm, PC 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807 Telephone: 812-232-2434 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants 1 BRIEF OF APPELLANT AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA (“AFA”) Table of Contents Table of Contents . 2 Table of Authorities . 4 Statement of Issues . 5 Statement of Case . 6 Statement of Facts. 7 A. RFRAs have a strongly bipartisan history, same-sex marriage is recent, and this is a type of compelled-speech case called a forced-inclusion-expressive-association case.
  • Meet Charles Koch's Brain.Pdf

    Meet Charles Koch's Brain.Pdf

    “ Was I, perhaps, hallucinating? Or was I, in reality, nothing more than a con man, taking advantage of others?” —Robert LeFevre BY MARK known as “Rampart College”), School] is where I was first exposed which his backers wanted to turn in-depth to such thinkers as Mises AMES into the nation’s premier libertarian and Hayek.” indoctrination camp. Awkwardly for Koch, Freedom What makes Charles Koch tick? There are plenty of secondary School didn’t just teach radical Despite decades of building the sources placing Koch at LeFevre’s pro-property libertarianism, it also nation’s most impressive ideological Freedom School. Libertarian court published a series of Holocaust- and influence-peddling network, historian Brian Doherty—who has denial articles through its house from ideas-mills to think-tanks to spent most of his adult life on the magazine, Ramparts Journal. The policy-lobbying machines, the Koch Koch brothers’ payroll—described first of those articles was published brothers only really came to public LeFevre as “an anarchist figure in 1966, two years after Charles prominence in the past couple of who stole Charles Koch’s heart;” Koch joined Freedom School as years. Since then we’ve learned a Murray Rothbard, who co-founded executive, trustee and funder. lot about the billionaire siblings’ the Cato Institute with Charles “Evenifoneweretoaccept vast web of influence and power in Koch in 1977, wrote that Charles themostextremeand American politics and ideas. “had been converted as a youth to exaggeratedindictment Yet, for all that attention, there libertarianism by LeFevre.” ofHitlerandthenational are still big holes in our knowledge But perhaps the most credible socialistsfortheiractivities of the Kochs.
  • Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field

    Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered
  • 2012 Platform Was Drafted After Soliciting Testimony from a Geographically Diverse Range of Hoosiers at Hearings in South Bend, New Albany and Indianapolis

    2012 Platform Was Drafted After Soliciting Testimony from a Geographically Diverse Range of Hoosiers at Hearings in South Bend, New Albany and Indianapolis

    Preamble We've come a long way in a short time. With a focus and a commitment to serve Hoosier taxpayers, and not special interests, Indiana's Party of Purpose has enacted improvements that have made government smaller and more efficient, improved our state's economy, and ensured Indiana's Comeback continues to move full steam ahead. After years of government spending and debt, Republican leadership balanced the budget without raising taxes. At the same time, services have improved across the state. A leaner state government has actually improved quality. Our Bureau of Motor Vehicles is now a model for efficiency, moving customers through in 10 minutes or less. Major Moves has improved infrastructure by providing a decade worth of funding for projects around the state that had been promised and delayed for decades. Property taxes in Indiana are among the lowest in the nation, having been cut by 30 percent and capped permanently by the voters and by our State Constitution. Along the way, we have lived by a number of simple principles, but atop that list is the fact that Hoosiers know what's best for Hoosiers. We don't ask for, or want, the federal government to interfere with or dictate how we should live our lives. The improvements we have made, together, have come from within, from Hoosiers. We owe a debt of gratitude to Governor Mitch Daniels and Lieutenant Governor Becky Skillman , our dynamic Hoosier duo, who have worked and led to make Indiana a better place to live, work and invest, alongside House Speaker Brian Bosma , Senate President Pro Tempore David Long and our majorities in the House and Senate.
  • COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for the 120Th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Agriculture and Rural Developmen

    COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for the 120Th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Agriculture and Rural Developmen

    COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS for the 120th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE MEMBERS Agriculture and CHAIR: Rep. Don Lehe (R-Brookston) Rep. Melanie Wright (RMM) (D-Yorktown) Rural Development Vice Chair: Rep. Alan Morrison (R-Terre Haute) Rep. Sheila A. Klinker (D-Lafayette) Rep. Jim Baird (R-Greencastle) Rep. Justin W. Moed (D-Indianapolis) Rep. Greg Beumer (R-Modoc) Rep. Joe Taylor (D-South Bend) Rep. Bill Friend (R-Macy) Rep. Doug Gutwein (R-Francesville) Rep. Dick Hamm (R-Richmond) Rep. Dave Heine (R-New Haven) Rep. Sally Siegrist (R-West Lafayette) Commerce, Small CHAIR: Rep. Bob Morris (R-Fort Wayne) Rep. Carey Hamilton (RMM) (D-Indianapolis) Business and Vice Chair: Rep. Doug Miller (R-Elkhart) Rep. Daniel P. Forestal (D-Indianapolis) Economic Rep. Ron Bacon (R-Chandler) Rep. Karlee D. Macer (D-Indianapolis) Development Rep. Martin Carbaugh (R-Fort Wayne) Rep. Melanie Wright (D-Yorktown) Rep. Jack Jordan (R-Bremen) Rep. Randy Lyness (R-West Harrison) Rep. Julie Olthoff (R-Crown Point) Rep. Jim Pressel (R-Rolling Prairie) Rep. Ben Smaltz (R-Auburn) Courts and Criminal CHAIR: Rep. Thomas Washburne (R- Rep. Edward O. DeLaney (RMM) (D- Code Evansville) Indianapolis) Vice Chair: Rep. Sharon Negele (R-Attica) Rep. Ryan M. Dvorak (D-South Bend) Rep. Cindy Kirchhofer (R-Beech Grove) Rep. Ryan Hatfield (D-Evansville) Rep. Kevin Mahan (R-Hartford City) Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington) Rep. Wendy McNamara (R-Evansville) Rep. Donna Schaibley (R-Carmel) Rep. Greg Steuerwald (R-Avon) Rep. John Young (R-Franklin) Rep. Cindy Ziemke (R-Batesville) Education CHAIR: Rep. Bob Behning (R-Indianapolis) Rep. Vernon G.
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St

    University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St

    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to lielp you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated vwth a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large dieet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
  • Indiana State Senate

    Indiana State Senate

    A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Another Election for the Record Books in Indiana Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 48 of 49 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious, including Republicans and Democrats. Forty-three (43) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Twelve (12) new legislators won with IBRG-endorsements. IBRG was significantly-engaged in support of six (6) top-target challenger and open-seat races, as well as successfully defending twelve (12) pro-economy incumbents seriously challenged with defeat. In one of the most dramatic turn of events in years, Republicans won significant battles for state legislative seats across the state to expand their “quorum-proof majorities.” These victories were particularly surprising to those working for months closely in campaigns and candidates, as Indiana’s public opinion environment on issues and views of incumbents was - right up until Election Day - about as bad an environment for Republicans and incumbents as seen in years. This marks the third election cycle in a row that Republicans have expanded their margins in the Indiana House and Senate. The Republicans won a net two (2) seat gain in the Indiana House of Representatives to achieve a 71-29 margin. Four (4) incumbent legislators lost reelection bids in the House (one Republican and three Democrats).
  • Billionaires Tea Party

    Billionaires Tea Party

    1 THE BILLIONAIRES’ TEA PARTY How Corporate America is Faking a Grassroots Revolution [transcript] Barack Obama: This is our moment. This is our time. To reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth that where we are many, we are one; that while we breathe, we hope; and where we are met with cynicism and doubt and those who tell us we can’t, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes we can. Man on Stage: They’re listening to us. They are taking us seriously, and the message is: It’s our county, and they can have it when they pry it from our cold dead fingers. They work for me! NARRATOR: Where did it all go wrong for Barack Obama and the democrats? After sweeping to power with a promise of hope and change, a citizens uprising called the tea party movement emerged. Their message was “no” to big government spending, “no” to healthcare and climate change legislation, and “no” to Obama himself. Woman: Obama is a communist. He says that he doesn't believe in the constitution. NARRATOR: Then, two years into Obama’s presidency, tea party endorsed candidates emerged to sweep the republicans to victory in the House of Representatives. Male News Reader: 32% of the candidates that were elected last night across this country are affiliated with the Tea Party movement. Rand Paul: There's a Tea Party tidal wave, and we're sending a message to 'em. Female Reporter: And they see it as a repudiation of the President and his policies.
  • Civil Defense and Homeland Security: a Short History of National Preparedness Efforts

    Civil Defense and Homeland Security: a Short History of National Preparedness Efforts

    Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 1 Civil Defense and Homeland Security: A Short History of National Preparedness Efforts September 2006 Homeland Security National Preparedness Task Force 2 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is the result of a requirement by the Director of the Department of Homeland Security’s National Preparedness Task Force to examine the history of national preparedness efforts in the United States. The report provides a concise and accessible historical overview of U.S. national preparedness efforts since World War I, identifying and analyzing key policy efforts, drivers of change, and lessons learned. While the report provides much critical information, it is not meant to be a substitute for more comprehensive historical and analytical treatments. It is hoped that the report will be an informative and useful resource for policymakers, those individuals interested in the history of what is today known as homeland security, and homeland security stakeholders responsible for the development and implementation of effective national preparedness policies and programs. 3 Introduction the Nation’s diverse communities, be carefully planned, capable of quickly providing From the air raid warning and plane spotting pertinent information to the populace about activities of the Office of Civil Defense in the imminent threats, and able to convey risk 1940s, to the Duck and Cover film strips and without creating unnecessary alarm. backyard shelters of the 1950s, to today’s all- hazards preparedness programs led by the The following narrative identifies some of the Department of Homeland Security, Federal key trends, drivers of change, and lessons strategies to enhance the nation’s learned in the history of U.S.
  • State of the Statehouse

    State of the Statehouse

    hile elections sometime deliver results that are unexpected (the list is a long one; I’m sure you have your favorite upsets), there are also certain givens leading up to each voting responsibility. Two at the top of the list are: 1. Politicians, or maybe more accurately the people involved in the Wpolitical process, will repeatedly tell us why any election is important. That refrain is amplified in 2010, mostly because it determines who holds the mighty gavel – and pen – the following year. 2. A sea of change is coming, with the party out of power using that mantra to help regain control. The adage applies this time around, but it’s a different type of change than what was experienced two years ago or during the memorable mid-term election of 1994. The Indiana Chamber’s nonpartisan political action committee, Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), has a focused mission: help elect thoughtful candidates to the Indiana General Assembly who support pro-economy, pro-jobs legislation and initiatives. Jeff Brantley, with 20 years of experience in Indiana in a variety of roles, leads that effort as vice president of political affairs. Kevin Brinegar, Chamber president, has been with this organization for 18 years and involved in the legislative/political process for 30 years. Brinegar uses two key words – power and authority – in addressing topic No. 1. The 2010 election, of course, coincides with the 2010 census. Following the annual people count, the political party that controls the House and Senate in Indiana (and many other states), has the “power and authority to redraw district boundaries.