DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Report of Political Financial Support

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Report of Political Financial Support 2 As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2012/13 Corporate Responsibility update. Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. When engaging in lobbying efforts or making political contributions, we comply with the laws that govern such activities. All financial support and lobbying activity are overseen at the Board level by the Public Policy and Compliance Committee (PPCC), which is composed entirely of outside directors. The PPCC members receive a copy of the “Lilly Report of Political Financial Support” annually and a detailed briefing on company political engagement every two years in alignment with the U.S. election cycle. We lobby and make political contributions only where allowed under law. All decisions are made without regard for the private personal preferences of the company’s officers and executives. All of our employees must also comply with the policies in our written “Code of Business Conduct,” The Red Book, which includes Lilly’s core values, legal obligations and global policies, including our “Global Policy on Political Financial Support and Involvement.” All individuals who recommend political contributions in the U.S. are trained on our policies on corporate political contributions and LillyPAC contributions. 3 Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. In the U.S., we are committed to backing candidates of any party who support public policies that contribute to the health needs of the patient, pharmaceutical innovation and the interests of our company. In addition to disclosing support for individual candidates and independent expenditures, Lilly will disclose any company contributions to the political process via 527 organizations (e.g., political action committees for individuals or parties). Lilly will only fund other non-candidate expenditures by exception (e.g., certain ballot initiatives) and those contributions will be disclosed. The General Counsel and the Chief Financial Officer, or their designees, must approve all corporate political contributions before they are made. Our annual “Report of Political Financial Support” provides details of our company’s independent-political contributions; the activities of our political action committee, LillyPAC, which is funded solely by eligible employee contributions; and the governance processes for both. The LillyPAC Governing Board (the board) oversees all contributions made by LillyPAC. The board is comprised of 13 U.S.-based employees who represent components throughout the company. LillyPAC meets all disclosure requirements and is audited annually by Ernst and Young. For more information, view the reports for the current year and for four years of history: • 2013 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: (You are now viewing this report) • 2012 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support • 2011 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support • 2010 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support • 2009 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support 4 Lilly invests in direct lobbying efforts at the federal, state and local levels to educate policymakers on the specific implications that various legislation may have on the company, our community and patients. Information on our federal lobbying activities is reported to the U.S. Congress in accordance with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. Information on our state lobbying activities is reported as required in those states where we engage in lobbying activities. For more information, view the following reports: • Q4 2013 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure • Q3 2013 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure • Q2 2013 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure • Q1 2013 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure • 2013 State Lobbying Disclosure In addition to direct political contributions, Lilly maintains memberships in certain 501(c)4s - trade associations that report lobbying activity to the U.S. government. We support organizations that champion public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation, healthy patients and a healthy business climate. The “Lilly Report of Political Financial Support” also notes our memberships in trade associations that report lobbying activity to the U.S. government and to which we contribute $50,000 per year or more. Organizations where Lilly has a board seat are noted. American Feed Industry Association (board seat), Animal Health Institute (board seat), Biotechnology Industry Organization (board seat), Business Roundtable, Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce (board seat), Healthcare Leadership Council (board seat), Indiana Chamber of Commerce (board seat), National Association of Manufacturers (board seat), PhRMA (board seat) and U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 5 Bentley, Robert Dr. Robert Bentley for Governor AL R Governor $12,500 Blackwell, Slade Slade for Senate, Inc. AL R State Senate $1,000 Alabama 2014 AL R $6,000 Alabama Republican Party - Non Federal Account AL R State Party $1,500 Alabama Republican Party - Non Federal Account AL R State Party $2,500 STORM PAC AL R State House $1,500 Armstrong, Eddie Eddie Armstrong Campaign AR D State House $200 Branscum, David David Branscum Campaign AR R State House $200 Broadway, Mary Mary Broadway Campaign AR D State House $200 Burkhalter, John John Burkhalter Campaign AR D Lt. Governor $250 Catlett, John Catlett for House District 73 AR D State House $200 Chesterfield, Linda Linda Chesterfield Campaign AR D State Senate $350 Copenhaver, Harold Harold Copenhaver Campaign AR D State House $200 Cozart, Bruce Cozart for House District 24 AR R State House $200 Davis, Andy Andy Davis Campaign AR R State House $200 Dotson, Jim Jim Dotson Campaign AR R State House $200 Douglas, Dan Dan Douglas Campaign AR R State House $200 Ferguson, Deborah Deborah Ferguson Campaign AR D State House $200 Gillam, Jeremy Jeremy Gillam Campaign AR R State House $250 Gossage, Bill Bill Gossage Campaign AR R State House $200 Hawthorne, Fonda Fonda Hawthorne Campaign AR D State House $200 Hickerson, Prissy Prissy Hickerson Campaign AR R State House $200 Holcomb, Mike Mike Holcomb Campaign AR D State House $200 Jett, Joe Joe Jett Campaign AR D State House $200 Kizzia, David Kizzia for House AR D State House $200 Leding, Greg Leding for House District 86 AR D State House $300 Linck, Kelley Linck for House District 99 AR R State House $300 Love, Fred Fred Love Campaign AR D State House $250 Meeks, David David Meeks Campaign AR R State House $200 Miller, Josh Miller for House AR R State House $200 Murdock, Reginald Reginald Murdock Campaign AR D State House $200 Overby, Betty Campaign to Elect Betty Overby AR D State House $200 Richey, Chris Chris Richey Campaign AR D State House $200 Ross, Mark Mark Ross for Governor Campaign AR D Governor $500 Scott, Sue Sue Scott Campaign AR R State House $200 Thompson, Tommy Thompson for House District 65 AR D State House $250 Vines, John Vines for House District 25 AR D State House $200 Wagner, Wes Wes Wagner Campaign AR D State House $200 Womack, Richard Richard Womack Campaign AR R State House $200 6 Word, James James Word Campaign AR D State House $200 Wren, Tommy Tommy Wren Campaign AR R State House $200 Wright, Marshall Wright for House District 49 AR D State House $250 Atkins, Toni Toni Atkins for Assembly 2014 CA D State House $1,500 Bigelow, Frank Friends of Frank Bigelow for Assembly 2014 CA R State House $1,500 Brown, Cheryl Cheryl Brown for Assembly 2014 CA D State House $1,000 Fuller, Jean Jean Fuller for Senate 2014 CA R State Senate $1,000 Gaines, Beth Beth Gaines for Assembly 2014 CA R State House $1,000 Gordon, Rich Rich Gordon for Assembly 2014 CA D State House $1,500 Jones, Brian Brian Jones for Assembly 2014 CA R State House $1,500 Mansoor, Allan Allan Mansoor for Assembly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Action Committee (Pac) Quarterly Reporting Form
    POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PAC) QUARTERLY REPORTING FORM For assistance in completing To be filed with: this form contact: Mark Martin, Secretary of State Arkansas Ethics Commission State Capitol, Room 026 Post Office Box 1917 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72203 Phone (501) 682-5070 Phone (501) 324-9600 Fax (501) 682-3408 Toll Free (800) 422-7773 1. NAME OF COMMITTEE (IN FULL) 2. TYPE OF REPORT Arkansas Realtors Political Action Committee April 15 Quarterly covers January 1 through March 31 ADDRESS July 15 Quarterly 11224 Executive Center Drive covers April 1 through June 30 October 15 Quarterly covers July 1 through September 30 January 15 Quarterly covers October 1 through December 31 CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE 3. IS THIS REPORT AN AMENDMENT? Little Rock, AR 72211 YES NO SUMMARY FOR REPORTING CUMULATIVE PERIOD TOTALS 4. BALANCE OF FUNDS AT BEGINNING OF REPORTING PERIOD $166,152.53 5. INTEREST EARNED ON COMMITTEE FUNDS (IF ANY) $249.83 $253.20 6. TOTAL MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED $36,199.00 $237,274.51 7. TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO CANDIDATES/COMMITTEES $93,855.50 $93,855.50 8. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES $31,920.30 $129,666.25 9. BALANCE OF FUNDS AT CLOSE OF REPORTING PERIOD $76,825.56 10. NO ACTIVITY(check if you have not received or made any contributions during this reporting period) I certify under oath that I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge and belief the information so disclosed is a complete, true, and accurate financial statement. on file Signature of PAC Officer State of Arkansas }ss County of Subscribed and sworn before me this day of , 20 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Corporate Political Contributions to State Candidates and Committees
    Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees Alabama 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE SENATE Tim Melson R-01 $1,000 Greg Reed R-05 $1,000 Steve Livingston R-08 $1,000 Del Marsh R-12 $1,000 Jabo Waggoner R-16 $1,000 Greg Albritton R-22 $1,000 Bobby Singleton D-24 $1,000 Chris Elliott R-32 $1,000 Vivian Davis Figures D-33 $1,000 Jack Williams R-34 $1,000 David Sessions R-35 $1,000 STATE HOUSE Lynn Greer R-02 $500 Kyle South R-16 $500 Laura Hall D-19 $500 Nathaniel Ledbetter R-24 $500 David Standridge R-34 $500 Jim Carns R-48 $500 Harry Shiver R-64 $500 Elaine Beech D-65 $500 Pebblin Warren D-82 $500 Paul Lee R-86 $500 Chris Sells R-90 $500 Mike Jones R-92 $1,000 Steve Clouse R-93 $500 Joe Faust R-94 $500 Steve McMillian R-95 $500 Matt Simpson R-96 $500 Aldine Clarke D-97 $500 Napoleon Bracy D-98 $500 Sam Jones D-99 $500 Victor Gaston R-100 $500 Chris Pringle R-101 $500 Shane Stringer R-102 $500 Barbara Drummond D-103 $500 Margie Wilcox R-104 $500 Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees Alabama 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE HOUSE cont’d. Chip Brown R-105 $500 OTHER Will Ainsworth R-Lt. Governor $1,000 Kay Ivey R-Governor $5,000 California 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE SENATE Susan Rubio D-22 $1,000 Patricia Bates R-36 $2,500 Ben Hueso D-40 $2,500 STATE ASSEMBLY Brian Dahle R-01 $2,500 Jim Cooper D-09 $2,000 Jim Frazier D-11 $2,000 Tim Grayson D-14 $2,000 Catharine Baker R-16 $1,000
    [Show full text]
  • I N S I D E Voteothers Travel Alabama Retail Choices for Alabama to D.C
    WWW.ALABAMARETAIL.ORG VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2 B ENEFIT FROM THE VALUE. Alabama T H I S I S S U E Retail officers, I N S I D E VOTEothers travel Alabama Retail choices for Alabama to D.C. to Association retailers in the July 15 urge e-fairness — In the June 3 primary, primary runoffs. Don’t 93 percent of the can- recommends these candidates as the best run off on the runoff. ive Alabama Retail didates Alabama Retail Association members endorsed were elected, PRIMARY RUNOFF BALLOT met in mid-June with nominated or won a runoff JULY 15, 2014 F Alabama’s congressional position. Plan to go to the polls again July members and staff to 15 and consider voting for the candidates THESE OFFICES WILL APPEAR ON ALL REPUBLICAN PRIMARY BALLOTS present their case on the backed by Alabama Retail. need for passage of federal e-fairness legislation this FOR — Clothiers, a jeweler, year. SECRETARY FOR PSC, a furniture store owner “Congress can send a OF STATE Place No. 2 and a grocery representa- powerful message that they (Vote for ...) (Vote for ...) tive traveled to Washing- support small business by ton, D.C., on behalf of all ending policies that pick Alabama retailers to advocate for the pas- JOHN MERRILL CHIP BEEKER winners sage of the Marketplace Fairness Act this and losers year. They told Congress to quit picking THESE OFFICES WILL APPEAR ON REPUBLICAN PRIMARY in the free BALLOTS IN THESE DISTRICTS winners and losers when it comes to who market,” collects sales taxes. FOR UNITED STATES FOR said George REPRESENTATIVE, STATE SENATOR, Wilder, — Alabama Retail’s 6th District No.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Edition the BUSINESS ADVOCATE
    Special Edition THE BUSINESS ADVOCATE 1: This information and more Judicial Races can be found online and Supreme Court optimized for mobile devices at: Place 1 Sarah Stewart (R) www.voteforjobsalabama.com Place 2 Tommy Bryan (R) Place 3 Will Sellers (R) Additional information and help Place 4 Jay Mitchell (R) finding your polling location Court of Civil Appeals can be found at the Alabama Place 1 Christy Edwards (R) Secretary of State's website: Place 2 Chad Hanson (R) https://sos.alabama.gov/ Place 3 Terry Moore (R) Court of Criminal Appeals 1 Place 1 Richard Minor (R) Place 2 Chris McCool (R) On Nov. 6, voters will choose a governor, Place 3 Bill Cole (R) lieutenant governor, attorney general, secre- tary of state, auditor, treasurer, commission- State Board of Education Races er of Agriculture and Industries, 35 senators, Place 6 Cynthia McCarty (R) 105 state House of Representative members, a chief justice, four associate Supreme Court Alabama Senate Races justices, three court of criminal appeals judges, District 1 Tim Melson (R) three court of civil appeals judges, two Public District 2 Tom Butler (R) Service Commission members, and four mem- District 3 Arthur Orr (R) bers of the State Board of Education. District 4 Garlan Gudger (R) Legislative success happens when the District 5 Greg Reed (R) right people are elected, and that’s what our District 7 Sam Givhan (R) political action is all about — electing can- District 8 Steve Livingston (R) didates who understand the issues and are District 9 Clay Scofield(R) not afraid to step up and lead Alabama in the District 12 Del Marsh (R) right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement
    2019 U.S. Political Contribution and Expenditure Policy and Statement The Company’s policy is to participate in public policymaking by informing government officials about our positions on issues significant to the Company and our customers. These issues are discussed in the context of existing and proposed laws, legislation, regulations, and policy initiatives, and include, for example, commerce, intellectual property, trade, data privacy, transportation, and web services. Relatedly, the Company constructively and responsibly participates in the U.S. political process. The goal of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures is to promote the interests of the Company and our customers, and the Company makes such decisions in accordance with the processes described in this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement, without regard to the personal political preferences of the Company’s directors, officers, or employees. Click here for archives of previous statements. Approval Process The Company’s Vice President of Public Policy reviews and approves each political contribution and expenditure made with Company funds or resources to, or in support of, any political candidate, political campaign, political party, political committee, or public official in any country, or to any other organization for use in making political expenditures, to ensure that it is lawful and consistent with the Company’s business objectives and public policy priorities. The Company’s Senior Vice President for Global Corporate Affairs and the Senior Vice President and General Counsel review all political expenditures. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors annually reviews this political contribution and expenditure policy and statement and a report on all of the Company’s political contributions and expenditures, including any contributions made to trade associations or 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Responsibility Scorecard !
    Paid for by Alliance for Gun Responsibility | PO Box 21712 | Seattle, WA 98111 | (206) 659-6737 | [email protected] Prsrt Std US Postage PAID Publishers Mailing Service UNPRECEDENTED PROGRESS IN 2017 In 2017, a record number of bi-partisan legislators sponsored gun responsibility legislation. Two of our priority bills, including Law Enforcement and Victim Safety, passed with overwhelming majorities and have been signed into law. Looking to the future, we need to build on this momentum in partnership with our legislative champions, to create a gun responsibility majority in the Legislature and pass commonsense laws that help make our communities and families safe. THANK YOU TO OUR STARS! These Legislators Were True Leaders In Prime Sponsoring Gun Responsibility Legislation. Sen. Jamie Pedersen Sen. Patty Kudererr Sen. David Frockter Sen. Guy Palumboer 2017 Rep. Ruth Kagi Rep. Laurie Jinkins Rep. Drew Hansen Rep. Dave Hayes Rep. Tann Senn To Learn More Or Get Involved, Visit GUN RESPONSIBILITY gunresponsibility.org SCORECARD Paid for by Alliance for Gun Responsibility | PO Box 21712 | Seattle, WA 98111 | (206) 659-6737 | [email protected] 2017 GUN RESPONSIBILITY Senator LD VOTE Sponsorship Legislative Community Overall Grade State Representative LD VOTE Sponsorship Legislative Community Overall Grade State Representative LD VOTE Sponsorship Legislative Community Overall Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Trajectory Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Trajectory Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Trajectory LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD Guy Palumbo 1 100.00% 15.00 15.00 15.00 A+ n/a Derek Stanford 1 100.00% 13.50 14.25 15.00 A Joyce McDonald 25 100.00% 15.00 15.00 15.00 D n/a Randi Becker 2 100.00% N/A 9.00 0.00 C Shelley Kloba 1 100.00% 12.75 14.25 14.25 A n/a Melanie Stambaugh 25 100.00% N./A 0.00 0.00 D Andy Billig 3 100.00% 14.25 14.40 14.25 A Andrew Barkis 2 100.00% N/A 9.00 0.00 C n/a Michelle Caldier 26 100.00% N/A 7.50 9.00 B 2017 LEGISLATOR GRADES – Legislative leadership Mike Padden 4 100.00% N/A 9.00 0.00 C J.T.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE SENATOR JAY COSTA Serving the 43Rd Senatorial District
    STATE SENATOR JAY COSTA Serving the 43rd Senatorial District State Senator Jay Costa represents portions of the City of Pittsburgh, East Hills communities, areas of the Mon Valley and South Hills (43rd District). As a lifelong resident of Allegheny County, Senator Costa was born and raised in Pittsburgh and now lives with his wife Roxanne in Forest Hills. He has three children – two sons and one daughter. He is the son of the late Allegheny County Treasurer Jay Costa Sr. A graduate of Taylor Allderdice High School, Community College of Allegheny County, and Indiana University of Pennsylvania, and holds a Juris Doctorate from Duquesne University. Before his election to the Senate, Senator Costa was a deputy sheriff in Allegheny County and Allegheny County Register of Wills. He is currently a Principal in the downtown Pittsburgh law firm Dickie McCamey and Chilcote P.C. Senator Costa was elected Senate Democratic leader in 2010. Previously, he served as Democratic chair of the Senate Appropriations and Judiciary Committees and was Caucus chair. He co-chairs the General Assembly’s Arts and Culture Caucus. Senator Costa’s legislative record of accomplishment is long and features signature laws in the areas of education, family law, judicial reform, public safety, job creation and health care. Early in his career, Senator Costa prime sponsored the plan (FAIRx) to leverage rebates to lower drug costs for seniors – a concept later signed into law by Governor Ed Rendell. He was a strong supporter of expanding the nationally-recognized CHIP program and Medicaid. He also authored legislation to direct cooperative agreements between insurers and providers as a means to resolve the Highmark/UPMC coverage dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Political Contributions
    2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIST from Talk Business & Politics Managed by Trey Baldwin (@Baldwinar) & Jason Tolbert (@Tolbertobu) Send Inquiries by Email to [email protected]
    THE LIST From Talk Business & Politics Managed by Trey Baldwin (@BaldwinAR) & Jason Tolbert (@TolbertOBU) Send inquiries by email to [email protected] R-Republican; D-Democrat; L-Libertarian; G-Green; I-Independent FEDERAL OFFICES – 4 SEATS ON THE BALLOT U.S. Congress – District 1 Rep. Rick Crawford – R (incumbent) Robert Butler – D U.S. Congress – District 2 Rep. French Hill – R (incumbent) Paul Spencer – D Gwen Combs – D Natashia Burch Hulsey - I U.S. Congress – District 3 Rep. Steve Womack – R (incumbent) Robb Ryerse – R Joshua Mahony – D U.S. Congress – District 4 Rep. Bruce Westerman – R (incumbent) Michael Barrett – I Lee McQueen - I Tom Canada - L CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES – 7 SEATS ON THE BALLOT Governor Gov. Asa Hutchinson – R (incumbent) Jan Morgan – R (has formed exploratory committee) Mark West – L Lt. Governor Lt. Gov. Tim Griffin - R (incumbent) Attorney General Attorney General Leslie Rutledge - R (incumbent) Secretary of State Commissioner of State Lands John Thurston – R State Rep. Trevor Drown – R Anthony Bland – D Susan Inman - D Auditor of State Auditor Andrea Lea - R (incumbent) Treasurer of State Treasurer Dennis Milligan - R (incumbent) Commissioner of State Lands Tommy Land – R Alex Ray – R (Incumbent Land Commissioner John Thurston term-limited; running for Secretary of State post) ARKANSAS STATE SENATE – 18 SEATS ON THE BALLOT District 3 State Sen. Cecile Bledsoe – R (incumbent) District 4 State Rep. Greg Leding – D (Incumbent State Sen. Uvalde Lindsey not seeking re-election) District 5 State Sen. Bryan King – R (incumbent) State Rep. Bob Ballinger – R District 6 State Sen. Gary Stubblefield District 8 State Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Care in COVID-19 Economic Relief
    Legislative Building Washington State Legislature Olympia, WA 98504-0600 March 23, 2020 The Honorable Patty Murray, U.S. Senator The Honorable Maria Cantwell, U.S. Senator The Honorable Suzan DelBene, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Derek Kilmer, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Rick Larsen, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Pramila Jayapal, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Jaime Herrera Beutler, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Kim Schrier, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Dan Newhouse, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Adam Smith, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers, U.S. Rep. The Honorable Denny Heck, U.S. Rep. United States Senate House of Representatives U.S. Capitol U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Colleagues in Washington State’s Congressional Delegation: Thank you for all you are doing in this unprecedented time. As you consider any additional COVID-19 economic relief packages, we, the undersigned elected leaders of Washington State, write to respectfully request significant investments in and attention to the challenges facing child care. Here in Washington State and across the country, the child care industry is providing critical services enabling medical professionals, first responders, and other essential workers to provide for communities in our time of greatest need. And yet, the infrastructure of this critical system is crumbling in front of us and threatening our ability to recover from COVID-19 now and in the future. According to Child Care Aware of Washington, our state has already lost 143 child care centers, 105 family child care homes, and 19 school-age-only child care programs to COVID-19 related closures -- totaling a loss of 12,000 child care slots.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Annual Report
    2006 Annual Report Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Table of Contents 1SFTJEFOU+VEHFBOE%JTUSJDU$PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUPS 'JGUI+VEJDJBM%JTUSJDUPG1FOOTZMWBOJB+VEHFTPGUIF $PVSUPG$PNNPO1MFBTCZ%JWJTJPOBOE1IPUPHSBQI 5BCMFPG0SHBOJ[BUJPO $PVSU"ENJOJTUSBUJPO $SJNJOBM%JWJTJPO "EVMU1SPCBUJPO 'BNJMZ%JWJTJPO "EVMU4FDUJPO $IJMESFOT$PVSU +VWFOJMF4FDUJPO $JWJM%JWJTJPO 0SQIBOT$PVSU%JWJTJPO %JTUSJDU+VTUJDF$PVSUT +VEJDJBM5SBOTJUJPOT To the Citizens of Allegheny County We are pleased to present to the citizens of Allegheny County our 2006 Annual Report of Court operations. Joseph M. James Raymond L. Billotte President Judge District Court Administrator In February 2006, the Allegheny County Court of Common McClain, Ph.D., to facilitate the second annual high school Pleas began using the statewide Common Pleas Case education project in the city schools. This program, Management System (CPCMS) to manage and disseminate developed to educate students about the role of the courts Criminal Court case information. Allegheny County became in our society and their responsibilities as citizens, further the 59th of 60 judicial districts in Pennsylvania to “go-live” encourages students to participate in jury service by on CPCMS. An integrated case management system registering to vote. Common Pleas Court Judges visited 11 initiated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, CPCMS was city high schools during the month of March 2006, created to facilitate secure, complete, timely and accurate impressing upon students the positive aspects of civic criminal justice information sharing among criminal justice responsibility. entities throughout the state. This system will eventually allow for access to certain information by the public. In December 2006, the Pretrial Services Agency was created to improve the Court’s ability to more closely The Court sponsored its first Juror Appreciation Day in May monitor defendants released on bail and coordinate pretrial 2006 in conjunction with Governor Ed Rendell, the services among various programs.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN in STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP 2019 in 2019, 2,129, Or 28.8% of the 7,383 State Legislators in the United States Are Women
    WOMEN IN STATE LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP 2019 In 2019, 2,129, or 28.8% of the 7,383 state legislators in the United States are women. Women currently hold 510, or 25.9%, of the 1,972 state senate seats and 1,619, or 29.9%, of the 5,411 state house or assembly seats. Since 1971, the number of women serving in state legislatures has more than quintupled. In 2019, of the 352 state legislators holding leadership positions1 nationwide, 77, or 21.9%, are women. Women hold 38, or 23.6%, of the 161 leadership positions in state senates and 39, or 20.4%, of the 191 leadership positions in state houses. Women hold leadership positions in 29 state senates and in 28 state houses; in 12 states, women do not hold leadership positions in either chamber. The party breakdown for women serving in state legislative leadership positions is: Total Legislature State Senate State House Total Total Percent Total Total Percent Total Total Percent Women Leadership Women Women Leadership Women Women Leadership Women Total 77 352 21.9 38 161 23.6 39 191 20.4 D 58 163 35.6 28 72 38.9 30 91 33.0 R 19 187 10.2 10 88 11.4 9 99 9.1 I/NP 2 0 2 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 1 -- In 2019, five women serve as senate presidents and twelve women serve as senate presidents pro tempore; seven women serve as speakers, and eleven serve as speakers pro tempore of state houses. Fourteen women of color hold leadership positions.
    [Show full text]