2012 Political Contributions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2012 Political Contributions 2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S. debate over health care and pharmaceutical innovation. As a company that operates in a highly competitive and regulated industry, Lilly must participate in the political process to fulfill its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders, and its overall responsibilities to its customers and its employees. When engaging in lobbying efforts or making political contributions, we comply with the laws that govern such activities. All financial support and lobbying activity are overseen at the Board level by the Public Policy and Compliance Committee (PPCC), which is composed entirely of outside directors. The PPCC members receive a copy of the “Lilly Report of Political Financial Support” annually and a detailed briefing on company political engagement every two years in alignment with the U.S. election cycle. We lobby and make political contributions only where allowed under law. All decisions are made without regard for the private personal preferences of the company’s officers and executives. All of our employees must also comply with the policies in our written “Code of Business Conduct,” The Red Book, which includes Lilly’s core values, legal obligations, and global policies, including our “Global Policy on Political Financial Support and Involvement.” All individuals who recommend political contributions in the U.S. are trained on our policies on corporate political contributions and LillyPAC contributions. 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 3 Financial Support Elected officials, no matter what level, have an impact on public policy issues affecting Lilly. In the U.S., we are committed to backing candidates of any party who support public policies that contribute to the health needs of the patient, pharmaceutical innovation, and the interests of our company. In addition to disclosing support for individual candidates and independent expenditures, Lilly will disclose any company contributions to the political process via 527 organizations (e.g., political action committees for individuals or parties). Lilly will only fund other non-candidate expenditures by exception (e.g., certain ballot initiatives) and those contributions will be disclosed. The General Counsel and the Chief Financial Officer, or their designees, must approve all corporate political contributions before they are made. Our annual “Report of Political Financial Support” provides details of our company’s independent-political contributions; the activities of our political action committee, LillyPAC, which is funded solely by eligible employee contributions; and the governance processes for both. The LillyPAC Governing Board (the board) oversees all contributions made by LillyPAC. The board is comprised of 13 U.S.-based employees who represent components throughout the company. LillyPAC meets all disclosure requirements and is audited annually by Ernst and Young. For more information, view the reports for the current year and for four years of history: • 2012 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: (You are now viewing this report) • 2011 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: http://www.lilly.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/2011-Lilly-Political- Contributions.pdf • 2010 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: http://www.lilly.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/2010-Lilly-Political- Contributions.pdf • 2009 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: http://www.lilly.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/2009-Lilly-Political- Contributions.pdf • 2008 Lilly Report of Political Financial Support: http://www.lilly.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/2008-Lilly-Political- Contributions.pdf The quarterly reports in the current year for LillyPAC and corporate political contributions can be found at this website: http://www.lilly.com/Responsibility/ethical-business/Pages/public-policy.aspx 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 4 Lobbying Lilly invests in direct lobbying efforts at the federal, state, and local levels to educate policymakers on the specific implications that various legislation may have on the company, our community, and patients. Information on our federal lobbying activities is reported to the U.S. Congress in accordance with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. Information on our state lobbying activities is reported as required in those states where we engage in lobbying activities. For more information, view the following reports: • Q4 2010 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure: http://disclosures.house.gov/ld/pdfform.aspx?id=300344178 • Q3 2010 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure: http://disclosures.house.gov/ld/pdfform.aspx?id=300315815 • Q2 2010 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure: http://disclosures.house.gov/ld/pdfform.aspx?id=300300874 • Q1 2010 U.S. Congress Lobbying Disclosure: http://disclosures.house.gov/ld/pdfform.aspx?id=300275057 • 2012 State Lobbying Disclosure View now Memberships In addition to direct political contributions, Lilly maintains memberships in trade associations that report lobbying activity to the U.S. government. We support organizations that champion public policies that contribute to pharmaceutical innovation, healthy patients, and a healthy business climate. The “Lilly Report of Political Financial Support” also notes our memberships in trade associations that report lobbying activity to the U.S. government and to which we contribute $50,000 per year or more. Organizations where Lilly has a board seat are also noted. Memberships in 2012: American Feed Industry Association (board seat), Animal Health Institute (board seat), Biotechnology Industry Organization (board seat), Business Roundtable, Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce (board seat), Healthcare Leadership Council (board seat), Indiana Chamber of Commerce (board seat), National Association of Manufacturers (board seat), PhRMA (board seat), and U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 5 Lilly Corporate Contributions 2012 Candidate Organization / Committee State Party Office Amount Butler, Mack Committee to Elect Mack Butler AL R State House $500 Standridge, David David Standridge Campaign AL R State House $500 Alabama 2014 AL R $6,000 Alabama Republican Party - Non Federal Account AL R $5,000 Alabama Republican Party - Non Federal Account AL R $500 KAWPAC - Keep Alabama Working AL $5,000 Baine, John Baine for House District 7 AR D State House $200 Baltz, Scott Baltz for House AR D State House $400 Caldwell, Ronald Ronald Caldwell for State Senate AR R State Senate $500 Carmine, Les Carmine for House District 90 AR R State House $250 Carter, Davy Carter for House District 43 AR R State House $250 Catlett, John Catlett for House District 73 AR R State House $250 Cheatham, Eddie Cheatham for State Senate AR D State Senate $500 Cheatham, Eddie Cheatham for State Senate AR D State Senate $300 Clark, Alan Clark for State Senate AR R State Senate $500 Cozard, Bruce Cozart for House District 24 AR R State House $250 Dale, Robert Dale for House District 68 AR R State House $300 Dickinson, Jody Dickinson for House District 47 AR D State House $250 Douglas, Charlotte Douglas for House AR R State House $400 Edwards, John Edwards for House District 35 AR D State House $300 Elliott, Joyce Joyce Elliott for State Senate AR D State Senate $400 Flowers, Stephanie Flowers for State Senate AR D State Senate $350 Graves, Barbara Graves for House District 32 AR D State House $250 Harrelson, Steve Steve Harrelson State Senate Campaign AR D State Senate $350 Holland, Bruce Bruce Holland Campaign AR R State Senate $500 Holland, Bruce Bruce Holland Campaign AR R State Senate $300 Hopper, Karen Hopper for House District 100 AR R State House $250 Hyde, Barry Hyde for State Senate AR D State Senate $400 Ingram, Keith Ingram for State Senate AR D State Senate $500 Irvin, Missy Missy Irvin
Recommended publications
  • February 15, 2021 Dear Governor Wolf
    February 15, 2021 Dear Governor Wolf: CompetePA is a coalition comprised of statewide and regional business groups, small- and medium- sized businesses, as well as Fortune 500 companies. The coalition, which represents more than half the Commonwealth’s private sector employers, was formed in 2005 to help create a competitive business tax climate that encourages job growth in Pennsylvania. On behalf of over 160 businesses and organizations across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the CompetePA Coalition writes in opposition to the proposed tax increases to businesses, large and small across Pennsylvania, as laid out in your 2021-22 budget proposal. It is no secret that Pennsylvania has one of the least competitive business tax environments in the country. For 2021, we rank 43rd in the nation in the Tax Foundation’s “Corporate Tax Ranking”. At 9.99 percent, we have the highest non-graduated Corporate Net Income Tax (CNIT) rate in the country. While we appreciate your proposal to lower this rate, tying the rate reduction to combined reporting – a policy that adds complexity, uncertainty, and cost to business – ultimately further negatively impacts Pennsylvania’s competitive standing. While CompetePA has historically focused on just the CNIT rate and its structure, we would be remiss if we also didn’t share our opposition to the proposal to raise the Personal Income Tax (PIT) rate. Our PIT rate is one of the most competitive rates in the country, at 3.07 percent. It’s also the rate paid by many small businesses in our Commonwealth. As regions everywhere look to recover and thrive in a post-pandemic world, now more than ever we need to ensure Pennsylvania is competitively positioned versus the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Corporate Political Contributions H2 2012 July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012
    Microsoft Corporate Political Contributions H2 2012 July 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012 Name State Amount Apple for Kansas Senate KS $ 250 Armstrong Campaign Committee WA $ 700 Barbara Bailey for State Senate WA $ 600 Bob Hasegawa for State Senate WA $ 400 Brad Owen for Lt. Governor WA $ 500 Breaux for Indiana IN $ 250 Brownback for Governor KS $ 1,000 Bruce Chandler Campaign Committee WA $ 700 Bruce for Kansas Senate KS $ 250 Burgess for Kansas House KS $ 250 Burroughs for Kansas House KS $ 200 Campaign of Doug Holder FL $ 500 Carlin Yoder 2008 IN $ 250 Carlson for Kansas House KS $ 200 Cathy Dahlquist Campaign Committee WA $ 500 Chris Dorworth for State House District 29 FL $ 500 Citizens for Andy Hill (2014) WA $ 400 Citizens for Christopher Hurst WA $ 500 Citizens for Jim McIntire WA $ 500 Citizens for Karen Fraser WA $ 400 Citizens for Kevin Ranker WA $ 500 Citizens for Kim Wyman WA $ 1,000 Citizens for Marcie Maxwell WA $ 400 Citizens for Merritt IN $ 250 Citizens for Mike Carrell WA $ 700 Citizens for Ruth Kagi WA $ 400 Citizens for Steve Litzow WA $ 700 Citizens to Elect Larry Seaquist WA $ 500 Citizens to Re-Elect Lt. Governor Brad Owen WA $ 500 Colgan for Senate VA $ 500 Committee to Elect Brian C. Bosma IN $ 500 Committee to Elect Bruce Dammeier WA $ 500 Committee to Elect Cary Condotta WA $ 500 Committee to Elect Charles Ross WA $ 400 Committee to Elect Heath VanNatter IN $ 250 Committee to Elect Jim Hargrove WA $ 400 Committee to Elect Katrina Asay WA $ 400 Committee to Elect Linda Lawson IN $ 250 Committee to Elect Tim Lanane
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers, Commissioners Take Aim 12 Educators, 4 County Commissioners Challenging House, Senate Incumbents
    V19, N26 Thursday March 13, 2014 Teachers, commissioners take aim 12 educators, 4 county commissioners challenging House, Senate incumbents By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – The teachers are challenging in the House. The county com- missioners are doing the same in the Senate. Looking for trends heading into the November general election, 12 teach- ers, principals Democrat teacher Mela- and school board nie Wright (left) is in a members are seek- ing Democratic rematch with State Rep. nominations in the Jack Lutz) House, with re- In two other seats, HD21 where State Rep. matches coming in four districts: Timothy Wesco is facing Democrat Jodi Buoscio and in HD16 where Rensselaer School HD29 where State Rep. Kathy Kreag Richardson is facing Board member Richard Ludington is challenging State Rep. Joe Marcum, the Republicans ran unopposed in 2012. In Douglas Gutwein; HD35 where Melanie Wright came very HD28, State Rep. Jeffrey Thompson had no Democratic close to upsetting State Rep. Jack Lutz; in HD46 where opponent in 2012, easily defeated a Libertarian candidate James Mann will face State Rep. Bob Heaton, and in HD62 by more than 18,000 votes, and will face Sean Shanley where Democrat Jeff Sparks narrowly lost to State Rep. Matt Ubelhor. Continued on page 4 The sine die primer By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – Legislators who are Indiana and Purdue basketball fans will be too busy Thursday after- noon to watch their respective games only blocks away at the Big Ten Basketball Tournament. Instead, they are trying to meet the self-imposed “It’s completely optional for the deadline of 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphians' Efforts to Create a Green, Sustainable City Are
    http://weeklypress.com/print_this_story.asp?smenu=1&sdetail=1332 7/14/09 9:56 AM Philadelphians’ efforts to create a green, sustainable city are beginning to bear fruit By Raymond Simon | On April 29, Mayor Michael Nutter released "Greenworks Philadelphia," his framework for transforming Philadelphia into America’s greenest city. Then, on May 15, the Energy Coordinating Agency graduated its first class of low-skilled workers retrained for green-collar jobs. Philadelphia’s initial attempts to transform itself have been so successful that United States Representatives Robert Brady, Chaka Fattah and Allyson Schwartz would like them to serve as a model for towns and cities across America. Consequently, they convened a congressional field hearing entitled "Vibrant Communities, Healthy Waters, and Job Opportunities" on Monday, May 18 at the Academy of Natural Sciences. A congressional field hearing is loosely defined as any congressional committee meeting held outside of Washington D.C. Field hearings vary in tone and formality. At some, witnesses are sworn in, but Monday’s meeting was relaxed and informal. Six local experts in greening, sustainability and energy conservation testified: Blaine Bonham, Paul Bonney, Elizabeth Garland, Howard Neukrug, Liz Robinson, and Susan Wachter. The hearing’s purpose was threefold: sharing information; publicizing Philadelphia’s efforts in order to attract more funding to the region; and holding up Philadelphia as an example for the rest of the nation. Congresswoman Schwartz chaired the morning’s first panel discussion, which included testimony from Bonham, executive vice president of the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society; Neukrug, director of the Philadelphia Office of Watersheds; and Wachter, a professor of real estate and finance at Penn’s Wharton School of Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Christie Wins GOP Primary Over Lonegan; Bramnick, Munoz Win by LAUREN S
    Ad Populos, Non Aditus, Pervenimus Published Every Thursday Since September 3, 1890 (908) 232-4407 USPS 680020 Thursday, June 4, 2009 OUR 119th YEAR – ISSUE NO. 01-2009 Periodical – Postage Paid at Westfield, N.J. www.goleader.com [email protected] SIXTY CENTS Christie Wins GOP Primary Over Lonegan; Bramnick, Munoz Win By LAUREN S. BARR, PAUL PEYTON, JOHN MAGUIRE and RAYNOR DENITZIO Mr. Lonegan addressed more than Specially Written for The Westfield Leader 100 supporters, including former AREA — Tuesday night’s guber- well intentioned,” he is “simply wrong Scotch Plains Mayor Martin Marks natorial primary brought celebrations for this job.” He said that he under- at the East Brunswick Hilton, thank- for former U.S. Attorney Chris stands that the people of New Jersey ing them for their support and en- Christie and Incumbent Governor Jon are hurting with unemployment at a couraged them to join Mr. Christie in Corzine, who will now face off in the 15-year high. his campaign for governor. November General Election. “I know you don’t want govern- “We must have one common cause. A gracious Mr. Christie, 180,630, ment to hold your hand; you just want We need to beat Jon Corzine,” Mr. thanked his primary challenger, them to get out of your wallet,” Mr. Lonegan said. “I will do everything I former Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan, Christie said. He expressed the need can to move the Republican Party to 138,515, “for being a worthy oppo- for smaller government in Trenton, victory in November,” he said. By nent.” He invited Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Statehouse Report
    March 31, 2017 Big step forward for permissive county authority to levy additional $5 motor vehicle license fee Thank you to CCAO members & partners for your awesome advocacy efforts! Thanks to the General Assembly approving the Transportation Budget Conference Committee Report, counties are a BIG step closer to being able to levy an additional $5 motor vehicle license fee to fund local road and bridge infrastructure. The Conference Committee, tasked with ironing out the differences between the Ohio House and Senate, on Monday picked the House-passed provision that gave a board of county commissioners or county council the permissive authority to pass a resolution enacting the fee, though subject to voter referendum. County commissioners, county executives and county council members along with their staff and CCAO’s policy team worked with a coalition of advocates, including the County Engineers Association of Ohio (CEAO), regional planning agencies and several business organizations, to support the proposed additional $5 motor vehicle license tag fee, which hasn’t been adjusted since 1987. Thank you to CCAO’s members and our partners for your advocacy efforts that made an enormous difference! Several elected officials along with county staff provided testimony and attended statehouse hearings. Moreover, many contacted lawmakers expressing support for a board of commissioners and council members to exercise funding decisions, subject to referendum, that reflect the needs of their counties. The measure is before the Governor for his consideration and is expected to take action on the bill soon. Details on other provisions in the bill and the Governor’s action will be reported in next week’s CCAO Statehouse Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio House of Representatives Standing Committees
    Ohio House of Representatives Standing Committees Agriculture & Conservation Commerce & Labor Kyle Koehler (R- Springfield) Chair 614-466-2038 Dick Stein (R - Norwalk) Chair 614-466-9628 Rodney Creech (R-West Alexandria) VC 614-466-2960 Mark Johnson (R- Chillicothe) VC 614-644-7928 Juanita Brent (D- Cleveland) RM 614-466-1408 Michelle Lepore-Hagan (D- Youngstown) RM 614-466-9435 Brian Baldridge (R- Winchester) 614-466-3780 Willis Blackshear (D- Dayton) 614-466-1607 Adam Bird (R-Cincinnati) 614-644-6034 Janine Boyd (D- Cleveland Heights) 614-644-5079 Sarah Fowler-Arthur (R- Rock Creek) 614-466-1405 Juanita Brent (D- Cleveland) 614-466-1408 Paula Hicks-Hudson (D- Toledo) 614-466-1401 Alessandro Cutrona (R- Canfield) 614-466-6107 Don Jones (R-Freeport) 614-644-8728 Mark Fraizer (R- Newark) 614-466-1482 Darrell Kick (R- Loudonville) 614-466-2994 Jim Hoops (R- Napoleon) 614-466-3760 Joe Miller (D- Amherst) 614-466-5141 Don Jones (R- Freeport) 614-644-8728 Michael O’Brien (D- Warren) 614-466-5358 Gayle Manning (R- North Ridgeville) 614-644-5076 Jenna Powell (R- Arcanum) 614-466-8114 Bill Roemer (R- Richfield) 614-644-5085 Michael Sheehy (D- Oregon) 614-466-1418 Monique Smith (D- Westlake) 614-466-0961 Armed Services & Veterans Affairs Criminal Justice Haraz Ghanbari (R- Perrysburg) Chair 614-466-8104 Jeff LaRe (R-Canal Winchester) Chair 614-466-8100 Mike Loychik (R- Cortland) VC 614-466-3488 D. J. Swearingen (R- Huron) VC 614-644-6011 Adam Miller (D- Columbus) RM 614-644-6005 David Leland (D- Columbus) RM 614-466-2473 Richard Brown (D- Canal
    [Show full text]
  • Democrats Republicans 52 48
    V15, N42 Thursday, July 22, 2010 Battle for House takes shape Parties test outlier races, economy as Daniels engages By BRIAN A. HOWEY RISING SUN - The ad for Attica Clerk- Treauser Sharon Negele blipped up on Terre !"#$%&"'(&)"*"+%$$%&,-&."/$&0%%12&3$&4/&$5%&[7/$& Attica Clerk-Treasurer tangible electronic signal in the coming House Sharon Negele (left) Wars - the battle for the lower chamber which is challenging House will play a huge role in creating the reappor- Majority Caucus Chair- tioned Congressional and legislative maps for man Dale Grubb (top) the coming decade. in a race HPI viewed as “She’s more than just our neighbor,” a lower tier challenge. the voiceover states as it shows Negele greet- The HRCC is running ing neighbors, standing in front of an Attica TV to drive her name ID [7%&$7#81&"'(&09714':&4'&5%7&8"'(+&*"8$97+2& up, hoping the race be- “She’s someone we can count on. Instead of comes competitive if the a career politician, let’s send a trusted friend economy in languishing to represent us. After 22 years, isn’t it time to in the fall and a wave have a new voice for west central Indiana?” develops. (HPI Photo by & ;*&$5%&<=&[>%&97&/9&?%@#A.48"'&85". - A. Walker Shaw) Continued on page 3 How does Brad win? By DAVE KITCHELL LOGANSPORT - What is it exactly that a recent poll on the Indiana Senate race is expected to tell us? The Rasmussen poll, which trends Republican, tells us former Sen. Dan UThis election is going to be a Coats, a Republican who has not referendum on the borrowing, served in Congress in more than a decade, has a 51-30 lead over Brad spending, bailouts and take- Ellsworth, a Democrat who has been there for the past four.
    [Show full text]
  • March 30, 2020 the Honorable Tom Wolf Governor of Pennsylvania 225
    March 30, 2020 The Honorable Tom Wolf Governor of Pennsylvania 225 Main Capitol Harrisburg, PA 17120 RE: U.S. Department of Homeland Security memorandum regarding residential construction Dear Governor Wolf: As we are sure you are aware, on March 28th the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a new “Advisory Memorandum on Identification of Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers During COVID-19 Response”. We write today asking that you review this memorandum and consider placing all residential construction on your essential business list as the memorandum identifies. This would include your guidance to all “essential businesses” on proper safety protocols, requiring social distancing measures which can protect the workforce and allow operations to continue. During this unprecedented time, we must put public health and safety first. Operational critical infrastructure is vital during the response to the COVID-19 emergency for both public health and safety as well as community well-being. Critical infrastructure industries have a special responsibility in these times to continue operations, and the U.S. DHS has identified construction as one of those industries. In addition to the identified critical need of construction, we also believe this work, operated under the proper safety protocols, is essential now due to its role in continuing economic and societal functions post pandemic. We thank you for your time and attention to this matter and ask for your urgent consideration. Sincerely, Senator Joe Scarnati Senator Jake Corman Senator Patrick Browne President Pro Tempore Majority Leader Chair, Appropriations The Honorable Tom Wolf Page 2 March 30, 2020 Senator John Gordner Senator Bob Mensch Senator Ryan Aument Majority Whip Majority Caucus Chair Majority Caucus Secretary Senator Kim Ward Senator David Argall Majority Caucus Administrator Chair, Majority Policy Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • May 12Th, 2015 Senator Jim Honeyford Senator Karen Keiser
    Coastal Conservation Association TEXAS • LOUISIANA • MISSISSIPPI • ALABAMA • FLORIDA • GEORGIA SOUTH CAROLINA • NORTH CAROLINA • VIRGINIA • MARYLAND • NEW YORK CONNECTICUT • MASSACHUSETTS • NEW HAMPSHIRE • MAINE • OREGON • WASHINGTON May 12th , 2015 Senator Jim Honeyford Senator Karen Keiser Senator Bruce Dammeier Senator Steve Conway Representative Hans Dunshee Representative Richard Debolt Representative Derek Stanford Representative Norma Smith Dear Capital Budget Writers, I am writing to you today on behalf of the Coastal Conservation Association Washington (CCA) to request your support for $10 million in funding in the 2015-2017 Capital Budget to continue construction of the Deschutes River Hatchery at Pioneer Park in Tumwater. Funding for the Deschutes River Hatchery project was initiated in the 2013-2015 Capital Budget for preliminary site work, well development, pumps and piping. A $10 million investment this biennium will allow us to enter into the second phase of construction on this much needed hatchery in South Puget Sound. Recreational fishing is an important part of our economy. There are over 900,000 anglers in Washington who spend $1.2 billion annually and directly support 16,200 jobs. Recreational anglers are the single largest source of license fee and tax revenue to the Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Increasing recreational fishing opportunity in South Puget Sound supports local business and will generate more tax revenue to the State and to WDFW through increased license sales. Current salmon production on the Deschutes River is outdated and inefficient because of space constraints and limited infrastructure. As a result, fish must be reared outside the watershed at four offsite hatchery locations as far north as Everett.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Senate Districts
    IOWA SENATE DISTRICTS 1 26 Current as of Waylon Brown 28 Zach Whiting 4 August 2019 for the Dennis Guth Michael 89th General Assembly Breitbach 2 DOT District 2 33. Robert Hogg 34. Liz Mathis Randy Feenstra Amanda Ragan 27 32 Craig Johnson 3 DOT District 3 5 William 7 Dotzler 50. Pam Jochum Jim Carlin Eric Giddens Jackie Tim 30 Smith Kraayenbrink Dan Zumbach 31 Annette Sweeney 48 Carrie Koelker 25 DOT District 1 29 6 24 Jerry Behn 33 Mark Segebart 34 DOT District 6 9 23 Jeff Edler Jason Schultz 35 Herman C. Quirmbach 36 Todd Taylor 49 19 Zach Nunn Zach Wahls Chris Cournoyer 15 Tim Kapucian 37 38 43 20See Joe Bolkcom 46 22Detail18 16 47 10 21 17 Roby Smith Jake Kevin Kinney Chapman 39 45. James Lykam Mark S. 13 Lofgren 8 11 Julian B. Tom Shipley DOT District 4 Garrett DOT District 5 Thomas A. Dan Dawson Ken Rozenboom Greene 40 44 14 Amy Sinclair Rich 41 Taylor Iowa Senate District Bountaries Mariannette Miller-Meeks 12 42 DOT District Boundaries Mark Costello Prepared by the Iowa Department of Transportation and the Iowa Legislative Services Agency. For additional details see: www.legis.iowa.gov The data provided on this map is current as of August 16, 2019. Please visit our interactive map for the most up to date information. 08 - 16 - 2019 IOWA SENATE DISTRICTS Current as of District First Name Last Name August 2019 for the 1 Zach Whitting 19 89th General Assembly 2 Randy Feenstra 3 Jim Carlin Jack Whitver 4 Dennis Guth 5 Tim Kraayenbrink 6 Mark Segebart 7 Jackie Smith Des Moines Area Detail 8 Dan Dawson 9 Jason Schultz 10 Jake Chapman 11 Tom Shipley 12 Mark Costello 13 Julian B.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Legislative Alert
    IOWA LEGISLATIVE ALERT Issue: The Iowa Academy of Dietetics and Nutrition will hold a Lobbying Workshop and legislator visit on February 22nd, 2017. Points of Contact: Using the list attached to this alert, along with the action alert, contact your elected Representative and Senator. Others that are helpful to contact: • House Speaker: Linda Upmeyer, R-Clear Lake: [email protected] • House Majority Leader: Chris Hagenow, R-Windsor Heights: [email protected] • House Minority Leader: Mark Smith, D-Marshalltown: [email protected] • Senate President: Jack Whitver, R-Ankeny: [email protected] • Senate Majority Leader: Bill Dix, R-Shell Rock: [email protected] • Senate Minority Leader: Robert Hogg, D-Cedar Rapids: [email protected] Analysis Iowa law licenses dietitians for the providing of nutrition assessment, goal setting, counseling, or advice. There is an exemption in the law for licensed physicians and surgeons, nurses, chiropractors, dentists, dental hygienists, pharmacists or physical therapists that make dietetic or nutritional assessments, or give dietetic or nutritional advice in the normal practice of their profession or as otherwise authorized by law. However there is no such exemption for holistic nutrition professionals. The Iowa Academy of Dietetics and Nutrition will be holding a Lobbying Workshop along with meetings with key legislators. Recommendations We should politely disrupt the legislative day and urge policymakers to consider finding ways to open up the practice of nutrition. Specifically, we should call attention to parts of the law that are anticompetitive, and encourage them to investigate whether licensure of dietetics prevents competition, by creating a monopoly for a single profession.
    [Show full text]