Proximate Composition and Energetic Value of Demersal and Pelagic Prey Species from the SW Atlantic Ocean
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Review of Southern Ocean Squids Using Nets and Beaks
Marine Biodiversity (2020) 50:98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01113-4 REVIEW A review of Southern Ocean squids using nets and beaks Yves Cherel1 Received: 31 May 2020 /Revised: 31 August 2020 /Accepted: 3 September 2020 # Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2020 Abstract This review presents an innovative approach to investigate the teuthofauna from the Southern Ocean by combining two com- plementary data sets, the literature on cephalopod taxonomy and biogeography, together with predator dietary investigations. Sixty squids were recorded south of the Subtropical Front, including one circumpolar Antarctic (Psychroteuthis glacialis Thiele, 1920), 13 circumpolar Southern Ocean, 20 circumpolar subantarctic, eight regional subantarctic, and 12 occasional subantarctic species. A critical evaluation removed five species from the list, and one species has an unknown taxonomic status. The 42 Southern Ocean squids belong to three large taxonomic units, bathyteuthoids (n = 1 species), myopsids (n =1),andoegopsids (n = 40). A high level of endemism (21 species, 50%, all oegopsids) characterizes the Southern Ocean teuthofauna. Seventeen families of oegopsids are represented, with three dominating families, onychoteuthids (seven species, five endemics), ommastrephids (six species, three endemics), and cranchiids (five species, three endemics). Recent improvements in beak identification and taxonomy allowed making new correspondence between beak and species names, such as Galiteuthis suhmi (Hoyle 1886), Liguriella podophtalma Issel, 1908, and the recently described Taonius notalia Evans, in prep. Gonatus phoebetriae beaks were synonymized with those of Gonatopsis octopedatus Sasaki, 1920, thus increasing significantly the number of records and detailing the circumpolar distribution of this rarely caught Southern Ocean squid. The review extends considerably the number of species, including endemics, recorded from the Southern Ocean, but it also highlights that the corresponding species to two well-described beaks (Moroteuthopsis sp. -
What's On? What's Out?
CCIIAACC NNeewwsslleetttteerr Issue 2, September 2010 would like to thank everyone the cephalopod community. So EEddiittoorriiaall Ifor their contributions to this if you find yourself appearing Louise Allcock newsletter. To those who there, don't take it as a slur on responded rapidly back in June your age - but as a compliment to my request for copy I must to your contribution!! apologise. A few articles didn't One idea that I haven't had a make the deadline of 'before my chance to action is a suggestion summer holiday'... Other from Eric Hochberg that we deadlines then had to take compile a list of cephalopod precedence. PhD and Masters theses. I'll Thanks to Clyde Roper for attempt to start this from next suggesting a new section on year. If you have further 'Old Faces' to complement the suggestions, please let me have 'New Faces' section and to them and I'll do my best to Sigurd von Boletzky for writing incorporate them. the first 'Old Faces' piece on Pio And finally, the change in Fioroni. You don't have to be colour scheme was prompted dead to appear in 'Old Faces': in by the death of my laptop and fact you don't actually have to all the Newsletter templates be old - but you do have to have that I had so lovingly created. contributed years of service to Back up? What back up... WWhhaatt''ssoonn?? 9tth - 15tth October 2010 5th International Symposium on Pacific Squid La Paz, BCS, Mexico. 12tth - 17tth June 2011 8th CLAMA (Latin American Congress of Malacology) Puerto Madryn, Argentina See Page 13 for more details 18tth - 22nd June 2011 6th European Malacology Congress Vitoria, Spain 2012 CIAC 2012 Brazil WWhhaatt''ssoouutt?? Two special volumes of cephalopod papers are in nearing completion. -
ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing. -
Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Merluccius Australis
RESEARCH ARTICLE Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Merluccius australis (Hutton, 1872) Indicates Complex Salinity Structuring on their Spawning/Larval Grounds Paul Brickle1,2,3*, Pia C. Schuchert4, Alexander I. Arkhipkin1, Malcolm R. Reid5, Haseeb S. Randhawa6 1 Directorate of Natural Resources, Fisheries Department, Falkland Islands Government, Stanley, Falkland Islands, 2 South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley Cottage, Stanley, Falkland Islands, 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom, 4 School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand, 6 Ecology Degree Programme, Department of Botany, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Brickle P, Schuchert PC, Arkhipkin AI, Reid Abstract MR, Randhawa HS (2016) Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Trace element signatures of otolith edges and cores from 335 austral hake (Merluccius Merluccius australis (Hutton, 1872) Indicates autralis) were analysed using LA-ICPMS from samples collected in Chilean and Falkland Complex Salinity Structuring on their Spawning/ Larval Grounds. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145479. Islands' waters, in order to provide potential insights into stock discrimination and migra- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145479 tions. Fish were caught in two locations in Chile and four locations in the south-west of the Editor: Heather M. Patterson, Department of Falkland Islands Shelf. Univariate and multivariate analyses of trace element signatures in Agriculture and Water Resources, AUSTRALIA the edges of otoliths, representing adult fish, were not able to distinguish between samples ’ Received: July 27, 2014 collected in Chile and the Falkland Islands. -
Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae -
Ecologically Or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (Ebsas) Special Places in the World’S Oceans
2 Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) Special places in the world’s oceans WIDER CARIBBEAN AND WESTERN MID-ATLANTIC Areas described as meeting the EBSA criteria at the CBD Wider Caribbean and Western Mid-Atlantic Regional Workshop in Recife, Brazil, 28 February to 2 March 2012 Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. ISBN: 92-9225-560-6 Ecologically or Copyright © 2014, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression Biologically Significant of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Marine Areas (EBSAs) The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Special places in the world’s oceans The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi ble for Areas described as meeting the EBSA criteria at the any use which may be made of the information contained therein. CBD Wider Caribbean and Western Mid-Atlantic Regional This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention on Workshop in Recife, Brazil, 28 February to 2 March 2012 Biological Diversity would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. -
S1755267211000431jra
S1755267211000431jra Author Queries No Queries Marine Biodiversity Records, page 1 of 3. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2011 doi:10.1017/S1755267211000431; Vol. 00; e0; 2011 Published online 1 2 First report of Macruronus novaezelandiae 3 4 (Gadiformes, Merluccidae, Macruroninae) 5 6 7 from Atlantic tropical waters 8 1 2 3 2 9 alfredo carvalho-filho , guy marcovaldi , cla’ udio l.s. sampaio and m. isabel g. paiva 10 1Fish-Bizz Ltda, Rua Maria Garcez, 39, Sa˜o Paulo, SP, 05424-070, Brazil, 2Projeto Tamar-ICMBio, Avenida do Farol Garcia D’A´ vila, 11 s/n, Praia do Forte, Mata de Sa˜o Joa˜o, BA, 48280-000, Brazil, 3Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Unidade de Ensino Penedo, Av. Beira 12 Rio s/n, Centro Histo´rico, Penedo, AL, 57.200-000, Brazil 13 14 15 The occurrence of the merluccid Macruronus novaezelandiae from tropical waters off Bahia, eastern Brazil, is reported for the 16 first time due to the capture of an adult of 712.3 mm SL in May 2008, from a depth of 400 metres. Until then no specimen had 17 been reported north of 32829′S on the South American Atlantic coast. This new record extends the species’ range to about 18 2500 km northwards along the Brazilian coastline and is the first ever from tropical waters in the world. A comparison of 19 the morphometric characters is provided. 20 21 22 Keywords: range extension, Macruronus magellanicus, deep-sea fish, Brazil 23 24 Submitted 11 December 2010; accepted 14 March 2011 25 26 27 INTRODUCTION also observed in several other species of the family belonging 28 to the genus Merluccius, already cited above. -
MERLUZA AUSTRAL (Merluccius Australis)
MERLUZA AUSTRAL (Merluccius australis) por Analía R. Giussi, Susana B. García de la Rosa y Felisa Sánchez IDENTIFICACIÓN DEL RECURSO Clase: Actinopterygii. Orden: Gadiformes. Familia: Merlucciidae. Especie: Merluccius australis (Hutton, 1872). Nombre común:merluza austral, merluzón (Argentina); merluza del sur (Chile). Nombre en inglés: southern hake. Otros nombres científicos sinónimos en uso: Merluccius polylepis y Merluccius australis polylepis. DISTRIBUCIÓN GEOGRÁFICA La merluza austral es una especie que se halla ampliamente distribuida en el hemisferio sur, tanto en aguas argentinas y chilenas como en neozelandesas (Cousseau y Perrotta, 1998). En el extremo sur de América ocupa un área que se extiende, en el Océano Pacífico, al sur de los 40°S entre 50 y 600 m de pro- fundidad (Aguayo-Hernández, 1994), y en el Océano Atlántico al sur de los 50°S, desde los 100 a los 400 m de profundidad (García de la Rosa et al., 1997). Esta distribución es continua a través del Pasaje de Drake (Aguayo, 1995), hallándose individuos en la región norte del Estrecho de Magallanes (Céspedes et al., 1996). Esta especie se caracteriza por presentar hábitos demersales y está relacionada, en el Mar Argentino, con aguas frías de la Corriente de Malvinas (Otero y Simonazzi, 1980), localizándose sus ma- yores concentraciones entre 50°-55°S (García de la Rosa et al., 1997) (Figura 1). García de la Rosa et al. (1997), analizando la distribución de esta especie en el transcurso del año, observaron que en el verano las mayores concentraciones (9 y 13 t/mn2) se hallaron al sur de la Isla de los Estados (54°50'S), extendiéndose su área de distribución desde los 48° hasta 55°S y entre 100 y 200 m de profundidad. -
Fish Stocks United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
General situation of world fish stocks United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Contents: 1. Definitions 2. Snapshot of the global situation 3. Short list of "depleted" fish stocks 4. Global list of fish stocks ranked as either "overexploited," "depleted," or recovering by region 1. Definitions Underexploited Undeveloped or new fishery. Believed to have a significant potential for expansion in total production; Moderately exploited Exploited with a low level of fishing effort. Believed to have some limited potential for expansion in total production; Fully exploited The fishery is operating at or close to an optimal yield level, with no expected room for further expansion; Overexploited The fishery is being exploited at above a level which is believed to be sustainable in the long term, with no potential room for further expansion and a higher risk of stock depletion/collapse; Depleted Catches are well below historical levels, irrespective of the amount of fishing effort exerted; Recovering Catches are again increasing after having been depleted 2. Snapshot of the global situation Of the 600 marine fish stocks monitored by FAO: 3% are underexploited 20% are moderately exploited 52% are fully exploited 17% are overexploited 7% are depleted 1% are recovering from depletion Map of world fishing statistical areas monitored by FAO Source: FAO's report "Review of the State of World Marine Fisheries Resources", tables D1-D17, ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5852e/Y5852E23.pdf 3. Fish stocks identified by FAO as falling into its -
Seafood Watch
AND Argentine Shortfin Squid Illex argentinus Argentina Jig October 2, 2017 The Safina Center Seafood Analysts Disclaimer Seafood Watch and The Safina Center strive to ensure that all our Seafood Reports and recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at the time of publication. All our reports are peer-reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or of The Safina Center or their recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch and The Safina Center are solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. About The Safina Center The Safina Center (formerly Blue Ocean Institute) translates scientific information into language people can understand and serves as a unique voice of hope, guidance, and encouragement. The Safina Center (TSC) works through science, art, and literature to inspire solutions and a deeper connection with nature, especially the sea. Our mission is to inspire more people to actively engage as well-informed and highly motivated constituents for conservation. Led by conservation pioneer and MacArthur fellow, Dr. Carl Safina, we show how nature, community, the economy and prospects for peace are all intertwined. Through Safina’s books, essays, public speaking, PBS television series, our Fellows program and Sustainable Seafood program, we seek to inspire people to make better choices. The Safina Center was founded in 2003 by Dr. -
Description of Merluccius Tasmanicus Sp. Nov. and Redescription
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2006), 86,193^199 Printed in the United Kingdom Description of Merluccius tasmanicus sp.nov.and redescription of Merluccius australis (Pisces: Merlucciidae) P O J. Matallanas* and D. Lloris *Unidad de Zoolog|¤a, Departamento de Biolog|¤a Animal, Biolog|¤aVegetal y Ecolog|¤a. Universidad Auto¤noma de Barcelona, 08193, O Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. Institut de Cie' ncies del Mar (CMIMA-CSIC), Passeig Mar|¤tim de la Barceloneta 37^49, P 08003 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]. Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] A new hake species, Merluccius tasmanicus sp. nov., is described from New Zealand waters and another species, Merluccius australis is redescribed. Merluccius tasmanicus sp. nov. di¡ers from all other congeneric species in the following combination of characters: upper pro¢le of the head slowly concave; lateral line slowly concave in the caudal region; body depth 4.9^5.9 times in standard length (SL); orbital diameter 6.1^7.1 times in head length, 2.1^2.2 times in snout length and 1.6^1.9 times in interorbital width; second dorsal ¢n rays, 42^43; anal ¢n rays, 42^44; lateral line scales *164. Merluccius australis is redescribed to clarify the identity of this species. Merluccius australis di¡ers from all other congeneric species in the following combination of characters: upper pro¢le of the head straight; lateral line straight in the caudal region; body depth 6.6^7.1times in SL; orbital diameter 4.5^5.4 times in head length, 1.2^1.7 times in snout length and 1.0^1.3 times in interorbital width; second dorsal ¢n rays, 40^43; anal ¢n rays, 40^43; lateral line scales, more than 155. -
Chinese Japanese Flying Squid (JFS) Fisheries Improvement Scoping Report
Chinese Japanese Flying Squid (JFS) Fisheries Improvement Scoping Report December 2018 Ocean Outcomes (O2) Contacts: Songlin Wang, China Program Director Qing Fang, Consultant Dr. Jocelyn Drugan, Analytics Team Director and Fishery Scientist Rich Lincoln, Founder and Senior Advisor www.oceanoutcomes.org 1 Chinese JFS Fishery Improvement Scoping Report: October 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 OVERVIEW OF FISHERY PRE-ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 OVERVIEW OF FIP SCOPING .................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. STOCK AND FISHERY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 6 2.1 SPECIES AND STOCK .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 FISHERY OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................................................