DOCSLIB.ORG

ARGENTINE PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERY (Dissostichus Eleginoides)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARGENTINE PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERY (Dissostichus Eleginoides) Assessment against MSC Principles and Criteria for: ARGENTINE PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERY (Dissostichus eleginoides) 27th June, 2014 AUTHORS: Hanchet, S., Morsan, E., Bridi, R. and C. Medina Foucher (OIA Technical) CLIENT GROUP: Argenova S.A., Empresa Pesquera de la Patagonia y Antártida S.A. (PESANTAR S.A.), Estremar S.A. and San Arawa S.A. PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT REPORT Assessment against MSC Principles and Criteria for ARGENTINE PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERY (Dissostichus eleginoides) 27th June, 2014 CLIENT GROUP: Argenova S.A. Contact: Jaime Pérez Pena Address: Av. Belgrano 920. (1092) Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel: +54 11 5217 7830 Empresa Pesquera de la Patagonia y Antártida S.A. (PESANTAR S.A.) Contact: Daniel Rivera Address: Carlos Pellegrini 855 Floor 9. (1009) Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel: +54 11 4325 9553 Estremar S.A Contact: Marcelo González Address: Av. Olazábal 1515 Floor 11 Of. 1102-1103. (1428) Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel: +54 11 4343 2673 San Arawa S.A. Contact: Eduardo González Lemmi Address: 25 de Mayo 260 Floor 1 Of. 4. (9410) Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego Tel: +54 223 492 2215 CERTIFICATION BODY: OrganiZación Internacional Agropecuaria S.A. (OIA) Address: Av. Santa Fe 830, Acassuso (B1641ABN), Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel/Fax: (+54) 11 4793-4340 [email protected] ∙ www.oia.com.ar File: APT – Public Comment Draft Reportsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 1 Date of issue: 27/06/2014 Table of Contents. Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................... 10 3. Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Unit(s) of Certification and scope of certification sought ................................................... 12 3.2 Overview of the fishery ....................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background .......................................................................... 15 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................ 28 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background ............................................................ 46 4. Evaluation Procedure .................................................................................................................... 89 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ......................................................................................... 89 4.2 Previous assessments ........................................................................................................ 102 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ............................................................................................... 102 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ............................................................................... 102 4.4.1 Site Visits ....................................................................................................................... 102 4.4.2 Consultations ................................................................................................................. 103 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques .................................................................................................. 105 5 Traceability .................................................................................................................................. 107 5.1 Eligibility Date .................................................................................................................... 107 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery .......................................................................................... 107 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody .................................................................... 109 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practically Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................................................................................... 109 6. Evaluation Results ....................................................................................................................... 110 6.1 Principle Level Scores ........................................................................................................ 110 6.2 Summary of Scores ............................................................................................................ 110 6.3 Summary of Conditions ..................................................................................................... 111 6.3.1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 111 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement.......................................................... 112 References .......................................................................................................................................... 113 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 118 Appendix 1 Scoring and Rationales ..................................................................................................... 118 File: APT – Public Comment Draft Reportsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 2 Date of issue: 27/06/2014 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ....................................................... 118 Appendix 1.2 Risk Based Framework (RBF) Outputs .................................................................. 179 Appendix 1.2.1 Scale Intensity Consequence Analysis (SICA) ..................................................... 180 Appendix 1.2.2 Productivity Susceptibility Analysis (PSA) .......................................................... 201 Appendix 1.3 Conditions ................................................................................................................. 202 Appendix 2. Peer Review Reports ....................................................................................................... 221 Appendix 3. Stakeholder submissions ................................................................................................ 248 Appendix 4. Surveillance Frequency ................................................................................................... 280 Appendix 5. Client Agreement ............................................................................................................ 281 Appendix 5.1 Objections Process .................................................................................................... 282 File: APT – Public Comment Draft Reportsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 3 Date of issue: 27/06/2014 Glossary AA Aduana Argentina AEEZ Argentine Economic Exclusive Zone AFIP Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos APJ Area of Protection of Juveniles ASPM Age Structured Production Model CA Catch Authorizations CAIPA Cámara de la Industria Pesquera Argentina CAPECA Cámara de Armadores Pesqueros y Congeladores de la Argentina CASPMeN Comisión Asesora para el Seguimiento de la Pesquería de Merluza Negra CCAMLR Commission for the Conservation of Antartic Marine Living Resources CDS Catch Documentation Scheme CEDEPESCA Centro Desarrollo y Pesca Sustentable CENADAC Centro Nacional de Desarrollo Acuícola CEPA Consejo de Empresas Pesqueras Argentinas CIC Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas CITEP Centro de Investigaciones de Tecnología Pesquera y Alimentos Regionales CITES Convention on Internacional Trade in Endangered Species CMS Convention on Migratory Species CoC Chain of Custody CONICET Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONVEMAR Convención de las Naciones Unidades sobre el Derecho del Mar CR Certification Requirement CSD Comisión de Control de Descarga CPUE Catch Per Unit of Effort CTMFM Comisión Técnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo DGA Dirección General de Aduanas EEC European Economic Community ETP Endangered, Threatened and Protected FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFP Federal Fisheries Council FONAPE Fondo Nacional Pesquero File: APT – Public Comment Draft Reportsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 4 Date of issue: 27/06/2014 FVSA Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina H&G Headed and Gutted INIDEP Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero INTI Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Industrial IPI Inseparable or Practically Inseparable ISBF Introduced Species Based Fisheries ITQ Individual Transferable Quota IUU Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LTL Low Trophic Level MINAGRI Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca MSC Marine Stewardship Council MSY Maximum Sustainable Yield NGOs Non-Governmental Organizations OIA Organización Internacional Agropecuaria PAN Plan de Acción Nacional PCDR Public Comment Draft Report PESANTAR S.A. Empresa Pesquera de la Patagonia y Antártida PI Performance Indicador PISGs Performance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interactions of Patagonian Toothfish Fisheries With
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 17 (2010): 179–195 INTERACTIONS OF PATAGONIAN TOOTHFISH FISHERIES WITH KILLER AND SPERM WHALES IN THE CROZET ISLANDS EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEPREDATION LEVELS AND INSIGHTS ON POSSIBLE MITIGATION STRATEGIES P. Tixier1, N. Gasco2, G. Duhamel2, M. Viviant1, M. Authier1 and C. Guinet1 1 Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé CNRS, UPR 1934 Villiers-en-Bois, 79360 France Email – [email protected] 2 MNHN Paris, 75005 France Abstract Within the Crozet Islands Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) longline fishery is exposed to high levels of depredation by killer (Orcinus orca) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). From 2003 to 2008, sperm whales alone, killer whales alone, and the two species co-occurring were observed on 32.6%, 18.6% and 23.4% respectively of the 4 289 hauled lines. It was estimated that a total of 571 tonnes (€4.8 million) of Patagonian toothfish were lost due to depredation by killer whales and both killer and sperm whales. Killer whales were found to be responsible for the largest part of this loss (>75%), while sperm whales had a lower impact (>25%). Photo-identification data revealed 35 killer whales belonging to four different pods were involved in 81.3% of the interactions. Significant variations of interaction rates with killer whales were detected between vessels suggesting the influence of operational factors on depredation. When killer whales were absent at the beginning of the line hauling process, short lines (<5 000 m) provided higher yield and were significantly less impacted by depredation than longer lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Habitat and Trophic Ecology of Antarctic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NERC Open Research Archive 1 Distribution, habitat and trophic ecology of Antarctic 2 cephalopods: inferences from predators and stable isotopes 3 4 J. Seco1, J. Roberts2, F.Ceia1, A. Baeta1, J. A. Ramos1, V. Paiva1, J.C. Xavier1,2 5 6 1 Institute of Marine Research, Department of Life science, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal 7 [email protected] 8 9 2 Natural Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 301 Evans Bay Parade, Greta Point, PO Box 10 14-901, Kirbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand 11 12 3 British Antarctic Survey, NERC; High Cross, Madingley Road, CB3 0ET, Cambridge, UK 13 14 15 Abstract: 16 Cephalopods play a key role in the marine environment but knowledge of their 17 feeding habits is limited by a lack of observations and this is particularly true for 18 Antarctic species. Toothfish species are key predators of cephalopods and may be 19 viewed as ideal biological samplers of these species. A total of 256 cephalopod lower 20 beaks were identified from the stomachs of Patagonian (Dissostichus eleginoides) and 21 Antarctic toothfish (D. mawsoni), captured in fisheries of South Georgia and the 22 South Sandwich Islands in the South Atlantic. Long-armed octopus squid 23 (Kondakovia longimana) and smooth-hooked squid (Moroteuthis knipovitchi) were 24 the main cephalopod prey and both were predated upon wherever toothfish were 25 captured, though inhabit deeper waters at the South Sandwich Islands than at South 26 Georgia. Measurements of δ 13C from beak material indicated a clear segregation of 27 habitat use comparing adult and sub-adult sized K.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 651: 163–181, 2020 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published October 1 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13439 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Habitat preferences, foraging behaviour and bycatch risk among breeding sooty shearwaters Ardenna grisea in the Southwest Atlantic Anne-Sophie Bonnet-Lebrun1,2,3,8,*, Paulo Catry1, Tyler J. Clark4,9, Letizia Campioni1, Amanda Kuepfer5,6,7, Megan Tierny6, Elizabeth Kilbride4, Ewan D. Wakefield4 1MARE − Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal 2Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 3Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS — Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier — EPHE, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France 4Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK 5FIFD — Falkland Islands Fisheries Department, Falkland Islands Government, PO Box 598, Stanley, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ, UK 6SAERI — South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ, UK 7Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK 8Present address: British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB4 0ET, UK 9Present address: Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA ABSTRACT: Pelagic seabirds are important components of many marine ecosystems. The most abundant species are medium/small sized petrels (<1100 g), yet the sub-mesoscale (<10 km) distri- bution, habitat use and foraging behaviour of this group are not well understood. Sooty shearwaters Ardenna grisea are among the world’s most numerous pelagic seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Dispersal of Rockhopper Penguins Eudyptes Chrysocome from the Falkland Islands and Its Implications for Conservation
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 240: 273–284, 2002 Published September 12 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Winter dispersal of rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome from the Falkland Islands and its implications for conservation Klemens Pütz1,*, Rebecca J. Ingham2, Jeremy G. Smith2, Bernhard H. Lüthi3 1Antarctic Research Trust, PO Box 685, and 2Falklands Conservation, PO Box 26, Stanley, Falkland Islands, South Atlantic 3Antarctic Research Trust (Switzerland), General-Guisanstr. 5, 8127 Forch, Switzerland ABSTRACT: In 3 successive years (1998 to 2000), the winter migration of rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome from 3 separate breeding colonies on the Falkland Islands was monitored using satellite transmitters. After their moult, 34 penguins were followed for a mean transmission period of 81 ± 21 d. While there were substantial spatial and temporal variations in migration pat- terns, we identified several foraging areas where food availability is presumably higher than else- where. Coastal areas of the Falkland Islands and South America appeared to provide a sufficient food supply, and many penguins commuted between these 2 areas, which are about 600 km apart. Rock- hopper penguins from northern breeding colonies also used areas along the slope of the Patagonian Shelf up to 39°S, about 1400 km northwards. By contrast, only a few birds from the southern breed- ing colony migrated to the Burdwood Bank, which is situated about 250 km to the south of the Falk- land Islands, and adjacent oceanic waters. None of the penguins in this study left the maritime zone of the Falkland Islands in an easterly direction to forage in oceanic waters. The mean distances covered per day by individual birds varied greatly, depending on the phase of the foraging trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Departamento De Malvinas, Antártida E Islas Del Atlántico Sur
    Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2011 Departamento de Malvinas, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur Considerando que este pequeño aporte puede ser de gran ayuda para todos aquellos que tengan interés en este sector geográfico, que por otra parte integra el problema de soberanía que mantenemos con el Reino Unido, y por ende de nuestros intereses en la Antártida, retomamos – como lo habíamos hecho con anterioridad – con la transcripción textual de las noticias aparecidas en el periódico MercoPress - South Atlantic News Agency (http://mercopress.com/), abarcando todos los temas que - a criterio de la suscripta – puedan tener relación tanto con el tema antártico como con las Islas Malvinas María Elena Baquedano Departamento de Malvinas, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur MERCOPRESS. Monday, January 4th 2010 - 07:56 UTC Argentina recalls events of 1833 and reiterates Malvinas claim On the 177th anniversary of the “illegitimate occupation” by the United Kingdom of the Malvinas Islands, Argentina “repudiates” events of 3 January 1833 and calls on the UK to comply with the mandate of the international community and find a peaceful solution to the conflict. Liberation monument dedicated to the British troops that recovered the Falklands in June 1982 Liberation monument dedicated to the British troops that recovered the Falklands in June 1982 1 Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2011 An official communiqué from the Foreign Affairs Ministry released Sunday in Buenos Aires states that Argentina considers “incomprehensible the British negative to address the heart of the matter and to find a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty controversy”, according to the international community mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region
    TARGETED REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FROM FISHERIES RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH EAST MARINE REGION FINAL REPORT B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley, M. Green and K. Phillips December 2002 Client: National Oceans Office Targeted review of biological and ecological information from fisheries research in the South East Marine Region Final Report B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley M. Green and K. Phillips* CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart * National Oceans Office December 2002 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................5 Objective of review.............................................................................................................................5 Structure of review..............................................................................................................................5 Format.................................................................................................................................................6 General ecological/biological issues and uncertainties for the South East Marine Region ....................9 Specific fishery and key species accounts ............................................................................................10 South East Fishery (SEF) including the South East Trawl
    [Show full text]
  • High Seas Deep-Sea Fishing Grounds in the South East Atlantic Ocean 51
    50 Worldwide review of bottom fisheries in the high seas MAP 1 High seas deep-sea fishing grounds in the South East Atlantic Ocean 51 South East Atlantic Ocean FAO Statistical Area 47 (and a portion of 34) GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION OF THE REGION Angola, Namibia and South Africa are the three countries bordering the South East Atlantic Region (FAO Statistical Area 47) along the African coast. This region extends from the Central Atlantic in the north at 6°S to the Southern Ocean in the south at 50°S. The western limit of the South East Atlantic is the 20°W meridian, which means that the southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge is within the region, at around 15°W, and extends over the entire region from north to south. Other important bottom topographic features in this region are the Walvis Ridge and the Valdivia Bank, joining the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of Tristan da Cunha on the northern part of the Namibian continental shelf at around 18°S, and in the southern part, the Meteor Rise and the Agulhas Ridge. These are the areas largely targeted in the deep-sea bottom fisheries in the region, together with associated or isolated seamounts areas such as Ewing and Molloy Seamounts, Vema Seamount and those in SEAFO Subdivision A1 (SEAFO, 2007a). It is important to note that in the South East Atlantic, the continental shelf along the coasts does not extend beyond the EEZs of the coastal states. MANAGEMENT REGIME APPLICABLE TO DEEP-SEA BOTTOM FISHERIES IN THE HIGH SEAS Regional Fisheries Management Organization/Arrangement The South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO) was established in 2003 with the entry into force of the Convention on the conservation and management of fisheries resources in the South East Atlantic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish in Disguise: Seafood Fraud in Korea
    Fish in disguise: Seafood fraud in Korea A briefing by the Environmental Justice Foundation 1 Executive summary Between January and December 2018, the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) used DNA testing to determine levels of seafood fraud in the Republic of Korea. The results showed that over a third of samples tested were mislabelled. This mislabelling defrauds consumers, risks public health, harms the marine environment and can be associated with serious human rights abuses across the world. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for greater transparency and traceability in Korean seafood, including imported products. Key findings: • Over a third of seafood samples (34.8%, 105 of 302 samples) genetically analysed were mislabelled. • Samples labelled Fleshy Prawn, Fenneropenaeus chinensis (100%), Japanese Eel, Anguilla japonica (67.7%), Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra (53.3%) and Common Octopus, Octopus vulgaris (52.9%) had the highest rates of mislabelling. • Not a single sample labelled Fleshly Prawn was the correct species. • Mislabelling was higher in restaurants, fish markets and online than in general markets or superstores. • By processed types, sushi (53.9%), fresh fish (38.9%) and sashimi (33.6%) were the most likely to be mislabelled. • The seafood fraud identified by this research has direct negative impacts for consumers. It is clear that for some species sampled consumers were likely to be paying more than they should. For example, more than half of the eel and skate samples that were labelled domestic were actually found to be imported, which can cost only half of the price of domestic products. Swordfish mislabelled as Bluefin Tuna can be sold for four to five times as much.
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Saeri Chairman’S Foreword
    WE ARE SAERI CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD The annual report shows an Institute In the accounts for our second year as an growing in confidence. The foundations independent charity clearly show: and fundamentals established last year • We have achieved a near break-even WE ARE SAERI have been built upon successfully. budget in year 2 in the unrestricted The quality, dedication and talent of our funds, indicating sound financial staff remain central to the achievement of planning, management and tight our mission. It is their research excellence financial controls. and academic rigour that ensure our work • Careful cost controls resulting in a | CHAIRMAN is valued to international standards. It is slight decrease in operating expenditure their dedication and approach that have (£370,000 to £360,000), which wage helped us build new partnerships and and other inflationary pressures extend our reach. It is their commitment managed by strict financial oversight. to delivery and customer service that • Greater sophistication in the delivery of have seen income growth through our contracted activities through our trading commercial subsidiary, SAERI (Falklands) subsidiary resulting in increased Limited. Through our scientists’ work we recharges and donations to the charity have discovered more about the the world which contribute to its core costs. around us and moved the frontiers of knowledge. In addition, our work has repeatedly been independently tested and both our closed This year we have identified new species projects (Darwin Cetaceans and Natural – one of which now bears SAERI’s name - Capital Assessment (NCA)) and our and delivered excellent science. We have Group’s accounts have received brought more world class researchers unqualified audits.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxins in Shellfish from Argentine Patagonian Coast
    Heliyon 5 (2019) e01979 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.heliyon.com Spatiotemporal distribution of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins in shellfish from Argentine Patagonian coast Leilen Gracia Villalobos a,*, Norma H. Santinelli b, Alicia V. Sastre b, German Marino c, Gaston O. Almandoz d,e a Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos (CESIMAR-CONICET), Boulevard Brown 2915 (U9120ACD), Puerto Madryn, Argentina b Instituto de Investigacion de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Gales 48 (U9100CKN), Trelew, Argentina c Direccion Provincial de Salud Ambiental, Ministerio de Salud de la Provincia del Chubut, Ricardo Berwin 226 (U9100CXF), Trelew, Argentina d Division Ficología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n (B1900FWA), La Plata, Argentina e Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Av. Rivadavia 1917 (C1033AAV), Buenos Aires, Argentina ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Harmful algal blooms (HABs) have been recorded in the Chubut Province, Argentina, since 1980, mainly asso- Environmental science ciated with the occurrence of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins produced by dinoflagellates of the genus Aquatic ecology Alexandrium. PSP events in this area impact on fisheries management and are also responsible for severe human Marine biology intoxications by contaminated shellfish. Within the framework of a HAB monitoring program carried out at Environmental risk assessment several coastal sites along the Chubut Province, we analyzed spatiotemporal patterns of PSP toxicity in shellfish Environmental toxicology – Toxicology during 2000 2011. The highest frequency of mouse bioassays exceeding the regulatory limit for human con- Alexandrium catenella sumption was detected in spring and summer, with average values of up to 70% and 50%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Merluccius Australis
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Merluccius australis (Hutton, 1872) Indicates Complex Salinity Structuring on their Spawning/Larval Grounds Paul Brickle1,2,3*, Pia C. Schuchert4, Alexander I. Arkhipkin1, Malcolm R. Reid5, Haseeb S. Randhawa6 1 Directorate of Natural Resources, Fisheries Department, Falkland Islands Government, Stanley, Falkland Islands, 2 South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley Cottage, Stanley, Falkland Islands, 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, United Kingdom, 4 School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand, 6 Ecology Degree Programme, Department of Botany, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Brickle P, Schuchert PC, Arkhipkin AI, Reid Abstract MR, Randhawa HS (2016) Otolith Trace Elemental Analyses of South American Austral Hake, Trace element signatures of otolith edges and cores from 335 austral hake (Merluccius Merluccius australis (Hutton, 1872) Indicates autralis) were analysed using LA-ICPMS from samples collected in Chilean and Falkland Complex Salinity Structuring on their Spawning/ Larval Grounds. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0145479. Islands' waters, in order to provide potential insights into stock discrimination and migra- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145479 tions. Fish were caught in two locations in Chile and four locations in the south-west of the Editor: Heather M. Patterson, Department of Falkland Islands Shelf. Univariate and multivariate analyses of trace element signatures in Agriculture and Water Resources, AUSTRALIA the edges of otoliths, representing adult fish, were not able to distinguish between samples ’ Received: July 27, 2014 collected in Chile and the Falkland Islands.
    [Show full text]