DOCSLIB.ORG

Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region TARGETED REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FROM FISHERIES RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH EAST MARINE REGION FINAL REPORT B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley, M. Green and K. Phillips December 2002 Client: National Oceans Office Targeted review of biological and ecological information from fisheries research in the South East Marine Region Final Report B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley M. Green and K. Phillips* CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart * National Oceans Office December 2002 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................5 Objective of review.............................................................................................................................5 Structure of review..............................................................................................................................5 Format.................................................................................................................................................6 General ecological/biological issues and uncertainties for the South East Marine Region ....................9 Specific fishery and key species accounts ............................................................................................10 South East Fishery (SEF) including the South East Trawl and South East Non-trawl fisheries (SETF and SENTF)...........................................................................................................................10 Blue eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica)................................................................................18 Blue warehou (Seriolella brama)..................................................................................................22 Spotted warehou (Seriolella punctata). ........................................................................................25 Blue grenadier (Macruronus novaezelandiae)..............................................................................28 Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus).....................................................................................33 Pink ling (Genypterus blacodes)...................................................................................................39 Redfish (Centroberyx affinis)........................................................................................................42 School whiting (= red spot) (Sillago flindersi) .............................................................................46 Mirror dory (Zenopsis nebulosus).................................................................................................49 John Dory (Zeus faber) .................................................................................................................52 Flatheads (Neoplatycephalus spp., Platycephalus spp.) ...............................................................54 Jackass morwong (Nemadactylus macropterus)...........................................................................58 Gemfish (Rexea solandri) .............................................................................................................62 Eastern gemfish (Rexea solandri).................................................................................................62 Western gemfish (Rexea solandri)................................................................................................66 Ocean perch (Helicolenus percoides and H. barathri). ................................................................68 Silver trevally (Pseudocaranx dentex)..........................................................................................70 Royal red prawn (Haliporoides sibogae)......................................................................................72 Hapuka (Polyprion oxygeneios)....................................................................................................74 Dogfishes (Squalidae)...................................................................................................................76 Skates (Rajidae)............................................................................................................................80 Southern Shark Fishery.....................................................................................................................84 School shark (Galeorhinus galeus)...............................................................................................85 Gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus)...........................................................................................90 Sawsharks (Pristiophorus spp) .....................................................................................................93 Elephant fish (Callorhinchus milii)...............................................................................................96 Southern Rock Lobster Fishery.........................................................................................................98 Southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii).......................................................................................98 South Tasman Rise Fishery (including offshore deepwater fisheries)............................................104 Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus)..................................................................................105 Oreos (Allocyttus niger, A. verrucosus, Neocyttus rhomboidalis, Pseudocyttus maculatus)......105 Southern Bluefin and East Coast Tuna Fisheries (within the SEMR) ............................................108 Southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) .................................................................................108 Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) ..........................................................................................110 Skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) ..........................................................................................113 Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) .....................................................................................................115 Broadbill swordfish (Xiphias gladius) ........................................................................................117 Blue shark (Prionace glauca) .....................................................................................................119 Ray’s bream (Brama brama) ......................................................................................................121 Abalone Fishery..............................................................................................................................122 Greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata).........................................................................................122 Blacklip abalone (Haliotis rubra)...............................................................................................126 Striped Trumpeter Fishery ..............................................................................................................131 Striped trumpeter (Latris lineata) ...............................................................................................131 Beach Haul and Recreational Fishery for Australian Salmon.........................................................134 Australian salmon (Arripis trutta and Arripis truttaceus)...........................................................134 3 Snapper Fishery ..............................................................................................................................137 Snapper (Pagrus auratus) ...........................................................................................................137 Scallop Fishery................................................................................................................................142 Scallops.......................................................................................................................................142 Patagonian Toothfish Fishery (Macquarie Island)..........................................................................149 Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides).........................................................................149 Jack Mackerel Fishery ....................................................................................................................154 Jack mackerel (Trachurus declivis) ............................................................................................154 Redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus) ..................................................................................................156 Other Selected Key Species Accounts............................................................................................158 Pilchard (Sardinops neopilchardus /S. sagax) ............................................................................158 Blue sprat (Spratelloides robustus).............................................................................................162 Octopus (Octopus maorum and Octopus pallidus) .....................................................................163 Squid (Nototodarus gouldi and Sepioteuthis australis) ..............................................................164 Giant crab (Pseudocarcinus gigas).............................................................................................166
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And
    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
    [Show full text]
  • Latris Lineata) in a Data Limited Situation
    Assessing the population dynamics and stock viability of striped trumpeter (Latris lineata) in a data limited situation Sean Tracey B. App. Sci. [Fisheries](AMC) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2007 Supervisors Dr. J. Lyle Dr. A. Hobday For my family...Anj and Kails Statement of access I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that the University of Tas- mania will make it available for use within the university library and, by microfilm or other photographic means, and allow access to users in other approved libraries. All users consulting this thesis will have to sign the following statement: ‘In consulting this thesis I agree not to copy or closely paraphrase it in whole or in part, or use the results in any other work (written or otherwise) without the signed consent of the author; and to make proper written acknowledgment for any other assistance which I have obtained from it.’ Beyond this, I do not wish to place any restrictions on access to this thesis. Signed: .......................................Date:........................................ Sean Tracey Candidate University of Tasmania Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary edu- cation. Information derived from the published or unpublished work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references is given. Signed: .......................................Date:........................................ Sean Tracey Candidate University of Tasmania Statement of co-authorship Chapters 2 – 5 of this thesis have been prepared as scientific manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1.Xlsx
    Bone type Bone type Taxonomy Order/series Family Valid binomial Outdated binomial Notes Reference(s) (skeletal bone) (scales) Actinopterygii Incertae sedis Incertae sedis Incertae sedis †Birgeria stensioei cellular this study †Birgeria groenlandica cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Eurynotus crenatus cellular Goodrich, 1907; Schultze, 2016 †Mimipiscis toombsi †Mimia toombsi cellular Richter & Smith, 1995 †Moythomasia sp. cellular cellular Sire et al., 2009; Schultze, 2016 †Cheirolepidiformes †Cheirolepididae †Cheirolepis canadensis cellular cellular Goodrich, 1907; Sire et al., 2009; Zylberberg et al., 2016; Meunier et al. 2018a; this study Cladistia Polypteriformes Polypteridae †Bawitius sp. cellular Meunier et al., 2016 †Dajetella sudamericana cellular cellular Gayet & Meunier, 1992 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Calamoichthys sp. cellular Moss, 1961a; this study †Pollia suarezi cellular cellular Meunier & Gayet, 1996 Polypterus bichir cellular cellular Kölliker, 1859; Stéphan, 1900; Goodrich, 1907; Ørvig, 1978 Polypterus delhezi cellular this study Polypterus ornatipinnis cellular Totland et al., 2011 Polypterus senegalus cellular Sire et al., 2009 Polypterus sp. cellular Moss, 1961a †Scanilepis sp. cellular Sire et al., 2009 †Scanilepis dubia cellular cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Saurichthyiformes †Saurichthyidae †Saurichthys sp. cellular Scheyer et al., 2014 Chondrostei †Chondrosteiformes †Chondrosteidae †Chondrosteus acipenseroides cellular this study Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser baerii cellular Leprévost et al., 2017 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Lyle Curriculum Vitae
    JEREMY LYLE Biography Dr Jeremy Lyle is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. He is interested in the field of fisheries ecology and biology with a particular focus on understanding fish population dynamics, the impacts of fishing on fish stocks and the characteristics of the recreational as well as commercial fishing sectors. After completing his PhD at the University of Liverpool (UK), Jeremy was employed as a fisheries scientist in the Northern Territory where he led a major initiative to develop a shark fishery off northern Australia. From there he joined the then Tasmanian Sea Fisheries Department and later the University of Tasmania. He has worked on a wide variety of commercial fisheries, including offshore trawl, small pelagics and coastal fisheries, as well as conducting recreational fishing surveys over many years. The primary focus of his research has been to understand the impacts of fishing on target and non-target species and provide the science required to support the sustainable management of the fish stocks. Jeremy's research interests include understanding the impacts of fishing activities on marine resources and how these can be developed and managed sustainably. In relation to recreational fisheries, he has a strong interest in the development of cost-effective survey methods as well as understanding the dynamics and drivers of fishing participation and their implications for resource sharing and management. CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Jeremy Martin Lyle Address: Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Private Bag 49 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Telephone: Work + 61 3 6227 7255 Mob: +61 407 277 426 Email: [email protected] Current situation: Senior Research Fellow, Fisheries Program Academic History University of Liverpool (Department of Marine Biology), England.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79 (2008) 35–44 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecss Development of eggs and larvae of Emmelichthys nitidus (Percoidei: Emmelichthyidae) in south-eastern Australia, including a temperature-dependent egg incubation model Francisco J. Neira*, John P. Keane, Jeremy M. Lyle, Sean R. Tracey Marine Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute (TAFI), University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia article info abstract Article history: Reared eggs and field-collected material were employed to describe the development of the pelagic eggs Received 15 October 2007 and larvae of Emmelichthys nitidus (Emmelichthyidae), a small (36 cm TL) mid-water schooling species Accepted 7 March 2008 common in shelf waters of temperate Australia. Hydrated oocytes from adults trawled from spawning Available online 27 March 2008 grounds off eastern Tasmania were fertilized and reared to the yolk-sac larval stage, and the data em- ployed to build a temperature-dependent egg incubation model.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems – Processes and Practices in the High Seas Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems Processes and Practices in the High Seas
    ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 595 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 595 Vulnerable marine ecosystems – Processes and practices in the high seas Vulnerable marine ecosystems Processes and practices in the high seas This publication, Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems: processes and practices in the high seas, provides regional fisheries management bodies, States, and other interested parties with a summary of existing regional measures to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts caused by deep-sea fisheries using bottom contact gears in the high seas. This publication compiles and summarizes information on the processes and practices of the regional fishery management bodies, with mandates to manage deep-sea fisheries in the high seas, to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems. ISBN 978-92-5-109340-5 ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 9 789251 093405 I5952E/2/03.17 Cover photo credits: Photo descriptions clockwise from top-left: Acanthagorgia spp., Paragorgia arborea, Vase sponges (images courtesy of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada); and Callogorgia spp. (image courtesy of Kirsty Kemp, the Zoological Society of London). FAO FISHERIES AND Vulnerable marine ecosystems AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL Processes and practices in the high seas PAPER 595 Edited by Anthony Thompson FAO Consultant Rome, Italy Jessica Sanders Fisheries Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Merete Tandstad Fisheries Resources Officer FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy Fabio Carocci Fishery Information Assistant FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy and Jessica Fuller FAO Consultant Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Stylet Elemental Signatures Indicate Population Structure in a Holobenthic Octopus Species, Octopus Pallidus
    Vol. 371: 1–10, 2008 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 19 doi: 10.3354/meps07722 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Stylet elemental signatures indicate population structure in a holobenthic octopus species, Octopus pallidus Zoë A. Doubleday1,*, Gretta T. Pecl1, Jayson M. Semmens1, Leonid Danyushevsky2 1Marine Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 2Centre for Ore Deposit Research, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 79, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia ABSTRACT: Targeted trace elemental analysis was used to investigate the population structure and disper- sal patterns of the holobenthic octopus species Octopus pallidus (Hoyle, 1885). Multi-elemental signatures within the pre-hatch region of the stylet (an internal ‘shell’) were used to determine the common origins and levels of connectivity of individuals collected from 5 locations in Tasmania. To determine whether hatchling elemental signatures could be used as tags for natal ori- gin, hatchling stylets from 3 of the 5 locations were also analysed. We analyzed 12 elements using laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA- ICPMS). Of the 12 elements, 7 were excellent spatial discriminators. There was evidence of high-level struc- turing with distinct groupings between all sites (the 2 closest being 85 km apart) within the adult O. pallidus Octopus pallidus, a holobenthic species found in south-east population, suggesting that all adults had hatched in or Australia near their respective collection sites. The hatchling sig- Photo: Stephen Leporati natures showed significant spatial variation, and a high percentage of individuals could successfully be traced back to their collection locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Catch and Effort Data
    Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System CHAPTER 11: INLAND WATERS RIVER FISHERY INFORMATION SYSTEM 11.1 Background The Inland Waters River fishery is a multi-species, multi-gear fishery encompassing the South Australian sector of the River Murray and its backwaters (Map 11.1). Historically, the fishery was based on harvesting Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii), golden perch (Macquaria ambigua), and bony bream (Nematalosa erebi). The fishery was restructured in July 2003 to a non-native dominate fishery and the commercial fishing for significant native species is now prohibited. The fishery is now based predominantly on the taking European carp (Cyprinus carpio) and redfin perch (Perca fluviatilis). There are a total of 6 licence holders who operate within the fishery. Prior to the restructure 30 license holders fished the river, each with a designated reach. Up to December 2007 SARDI production tables hold in excess of 270,000 daily records. Data is held from 1984/85 to current and is continually being updated. Refer to Figure 11.3 for an entity relationship diagram of the inland waters system that encompasses the River Fishery. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 81 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Map 11.1: The inland waters river fishery – River Murray area designations. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 82 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System 11.2 Research Logbook Information Each licence holder is required to submit a daily fishing return by the 15th day of each month detailing their fishing activities for the previous month (Figure 11.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarantine Requirements for the Importation of Live Crustaceans and Molluscs
    Quarantine Requirements for the Importation of Live Crustaceans and Molluscs (In case of any discrepancy between the English version and the Chinese text of these Requirements, the Chinese text shall govern.) Promulgated by Council of Agriculture on April 12, 2004 Amendment by Council of Agriculture on February 16, 2011 Amendment by Council of Agriculture on March 25, 2014 Amendment by Council of Agriculture on August 25, 2014 1. The scope of the species and listed diseases of live crustaceans and molluscs of this Requirements apply to are listed in the Attached tables of the Requirements. The applicant shall apply for an import permit from a central competent authority if the species of live crustaceans and molluscs are referred to Article 24 of Wildlife Conservation Act as protected wildlife or Article 27 as wildlife which are not domestic species. The importation of live crustaceans and molluscs for human consumption shall comply with Article 11 of Act Governing Food Sanitation. 2. The importation of live crustaceans and molluscs for aquaculture or rearing purpose shall comply with the following conditions: (1) Live crustaceans and molluscs shall be kept in the water area or aquaculture facility of origin approved by the exporting country for at least fourteen days prior to the shipment, where high mortality of unknown etiology has not occurred among live crustaceans and molluscs during the previous three months. (2) The water area or aquaculture facility of origin shall meet one of the following conditions: I. The following basic
    [Show full text]
  • Octopus Consciousness: the Role of Perceptual Richness
    Review Octopus Consciousness: The Role of Perceptual Richness Jennifer Mather Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: It is always difficult to even advance possible dimensions of consciousness, but Birch et al., 2020 have suggested four possible dimensions and this review discusses the first, perceptual richness, with relation to octopuses. They advance acuity, bandwidth, and categorization power as possible components. It is first necessary to realize that sensory richness does not automatically lead to perceptual richness and this capacity may not be accessed by consciousness. Octopuses do not discriminate light wavelength frequency (color) but rather its plane of polarization, a dimension that we do not understand. Their eyes are laterally placed on the head, leading to monocular vision and head movements that give a sequential rather than simultaneous view of items, possibly consciously planned. Details of control of the rich sensorimotor system of the arms, with 3/5 of the neurons of the nervous system, may normally not be accessed to the brain and thus to consciousness. The chromatophore-based skin appearance system is likely open loop, and not available to the octopus’ vision. Conversely, in a laboratory situation that is not ecologically valid for the octopus, learning about shapes and extents of visual figures was extensive and flexible, likely consciously planned. Similarly, octopuses’ local place in and navigation around space can be guided by light polarization plane and visual landmark location and is learned and monitored. The complex array of chemical cues delivered by water and on surfaces does not fit neatly into the components above and has barely been tested but might easily be described as perceptually rich.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Australia Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth)
    8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street North, Suite 202 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 USA Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. South East Australia Small Pelagic Fishery (Commonwealth) Blue Mackerel (Scomber australasicus) Jack Mackerel (Trachurus declivis) Redbait (Emmelichthys nitidus) Mid-Water Trawl MSC Fishery Assessment Final Report and Determination Prepared for Ridley Agriproducts Pty Ltd. MRAG Americas, Inc. 16 July, 2019 Authors: Richard Banks, Mihaela Zaharia, Cameron Dixon and Amanda Stern-Pirlot MRAG Americas—Australia SPF Fishery Final Report and Determination 1 Project Code: US2619 Issue ref: Final Report and Determination Date of issue: 16 July 2019 Prepared by: R. Banks, C. Dixon, M. Zaharia, A. Stern-Pirlot Checked/Approved by: Jodi Bostrom MRAG Americas—Australia SPF Fishery Final Report and Determination 2 Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 6 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 8 2 Authorship and Peer Reviewers ....................................................................................... 12 2.1 Peer Reviewers .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]