DOCSLIB.ORG

Catch and Effort Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catch and Effort Data Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System CHAPTER 11: INLAND WATERS RIVER FISHERY INFORMATION SYSTEM 11.1 Background The Inland Waters River fishery is a multi-species, multi-gear fishery encompassing the South Australian sector of the River Murray and its backwaters (Map 11.1). Historically, the fishery was based on harvesting Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii), golden perch (Macquaria ambigua), and bony bream (Nematalosa erebi). The fishery was restructured in July 2003 to a non-native dominate fishery and the commercial fishing for significant native species is now prohibited. The fishery is now based predominantly on the taking European carp (Cyprinus carpio) and redfin perch (Perca fluviatilis). There are a total of 6 licence holders who operate within the fishery. Prior to the restructure 30 license holders fished the river, each with a designated reach. Up to December 2007 SARDI production tables hold in excess of 270,000 daily records. Data is held from 1984/85 to current and is continually being updated. Refer to Figure 11.3 for an entity relationship diagram of the inland waters system that encompasses the River Fishery. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 81 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Map 11.1: The inland waters river fishery – River Murray area designations. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 82 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System 11.2 Research Logbook Information Each licence holder is required to submit a daily fishing return by the 15th day of each month detailing their fishing activities for the previous month (Figure 11.1). Table 11.1 lists the associated fields collected from the logbooks. Figure 11.1: An example of a South Australian inland waters catch and effort return. Table 11.1: An overview of the fields collected from the South Australian inland waters catch and effort return for the inland waters river fishery information system. Field Status Description Licensee Name Compulsory Licence holders name or company. Licence Number Compulsory Commercial Fishing Licence Number (R##). Main Place of Landing or Compulsory The place at which most of the catch was landed during the month. Code Month / Year Compulsory The Month and Year relating to the fishing activity. Fish Dealer/Processor The details of the fish dealers/processors the catch has been sold to. Sold To No of days when gear The total number of days for that month when the gear was set including any was set days the gear was not lifted. If the licence holder knows in advance any consecutive months where they will not fish they can indicate on the form which months these will be. If any Advanced Nil Return fishing activity does take place they must submit a fishing return that will overwrite the advanced nil. Personal Use, Public Check boxes indicating the methods of disposal of the catch. Sale, Bait The day of the month of each days fishing activity, including days when no Day of Month Compulsory fish were landed. The number of individuals fishing on the licence or in a boat owned by the Man Days Compulsory licensee each day. The main area that fishing took place for that day, according to the maps Main Area Compulsory provided in the logbook. The gear code used. A separate row must be completed for each gear used Gear Code Compulsory on the same day. Compulsory if This checkbox is checked and an accompanying Wildlife Interaction Form any wildlife Wildlife Interaction provided if there was any interaction during the fishing activity with any interaction threatened, endangered, or protected species. took place Effort Compulsory The number of effort units used on each fishing day, according to the specific South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 83 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System gear used. The name of the species targeted with each gear on each day. This may Target Species Compulsory change during any fishing trip. Compulsory if any weights Catches by Species The names (or alpha codes) of all species landed (refer to Appendix 4). have been provided The condition each species was landed i.e. whole (W), gutted (G) or headed Landed Conditions and gutted (H). 11.3 Processing, Data Entry Business Rules, and Validation Routines for the Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Data validation processes take various forms. Some of the validation is manual, conducted during the collation and processing phases, but the majority of validation is electronic via look up tables and code driven software activated during data entry and reporting operations. Table 11.2 lists the validation processes Information Systems and Database Support staff utilise to verify the data. Table 11.2: Validation process summary for the inland waters river fishery information system. Process Occurs at: Manual validation processes Collation Processing Entry Exception reporting Data entry validation On line data entry, software generated via look up tables and entry parameters Exception reporting Completion of data entry run random sampling of current and historically entered data Completion of data entry run Scientist comes back with comparison data and queries Report Generation 11.3.1 Manual Processing for the Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Whilst registering the receipt of the forms, Information Systems and Database Support program staff ensure the forms meet the requirements as stipulated in Section 14 of the Fisheries Management (River Fishery) Regulations 2006 by: Determining the licence number and date are valid. If the details are not provided, the missing information is determined by: Using PIIMS to verify the correct licence information; Determining the logbook sequence number; Determining any missing fishing periods from the returns register. The forms are then processed for completeness by: Ensuring all compulsory fields have been provided (refer to Table 11.1). Confirming the number of days fished corresponds to the number of details lines. Ensuring the units of effort recorded correspond to the gear used (see Table 11.4). Ensuring the species taken on a particular gear type is valid. Ensuring the applicable species codes are on the return (Appendix 4). South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 84 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Confirming the information provided in the footer details is plausible and the totals are correct. Ensuring a species is only reported once with one condition type e.g. a fisher may record the same species in two columns with two different condition types such as whole (W) and either headed and gutted (H+G) or gutted (G). As only one species can be entered the headed and gutted or gutted weights must be converted to whole weight refer to section 11.4. For any nil return the month and year are entered in pencil in the “Advanced Nil Returns” section on the return and the return is entered (Figures 11.3 and 11.4). Ensuring any returns recording any catch and release of silver perch are photocopied and filed in the corresponding silver perch folder. Do not enter any harvest of silver perch. If a fisher has recorded perch but has not identified the species, the species may be classified as silver perch if the animals were released, and there was a small amount caught, usually between 1 and 10. Ensuring a wildlife interaction form has been submitted if the wildlife interaction check box has been ticked or has been indicated in the comments section of the return, if there is no corresponding form this must be followed up immediately and documented in the wildlife interaction correspondence file. If the officer cannot determine the compulsory data or interpret the return the licence holder is initially contacted by telephone, if the licence holder cannot be contacted the return is noted with the date the return was sent back, photocopied, and sent back to the licence holder requesting the missing information. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 85 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Figure 11.2: A fisher return showing how the information has been processed and modified in pencil to reflect the activities. Note the officer has included the appropriate species codes. Figure 11.3: A fisher return showing how a nil return is processed. Figure 11.4: A fisher return showing how an advanced nil return is processed. South Australian Aquatic Sciences: Information Systems and Database Support Program SARDI Aquatic Sciences Information Systems Quality Assurance and Data Integrity Report (June 2009) 86 Chapter 11: The Inland Waters River Fishery Information System 11.3.2 Data entry business rules and electronic validation processes for the Inland Waters River Fishery Information System Figure 11.5 is a representation of the data entry screen used to transpose the information provided on the logbook into an electronic format. Figure 11.5: Inland waters information system data entry screen. Table 11.3: Fields, associated validation parameters, and rules for the inland waters river fishery information system. Field Name Functionality and business rules The licence number is validated against a list of valid licence numbers from Licence Number the licence table. The name populated against the licence number should correspond to the Licensee Name name provided on the return – if it doesn’t check PIIMS etc Main Place of Landing or Enter the main port/place of landing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Elephant Fish
    Best Fish Guide 2009-2010 How sustainable is New Zealand seafood? (Ecological Assessments) Produced and Published by Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand, Inc. PO Box 631, Level One, 90 Ghuznee Street, Wellington. www.forestandbird.org.nz November 2009 Acknowledgements Forest & Bird with to thank anonymous reviewers for their peer review comments on this draft. We also thank Peta Methias, Annabel Langbein, Martin Bosely, Margaret Brooker, Lois Daish, Kelder Haines, Dobie Blaze, Rohan Horner and Ray McVinnie for permission to use their recipes on the website. Special thanks to our Best Fish Guide Ambassador Dobie Blaze, keyboard player with Fat Freddy’s Drop. Editing: Kirstie Knowles, Barry Weeber and Helen Bain Technical Advisor: Barry Weeber Cover Design: Rob Deliver Cover fish (Tarakihi): Malcolm Francis Photography: Malcolm Francis: blue cod, blue moki, blue shark, butterfish, groper/hapuku, hoki, jack mackerel, john dory, kahawai, kingfish, leather jacket, moonfish, paua, porbeagle shark, red gurnard, red snapper, scallop, school shark, sea perch, snapper, spiny dogfish, tarakihi, trevally and trumpeter. Peter Langlands: blue warehou, cockles, elephantfish, frostfish, lookdown dory, oyster, pale ghost shark, queen scallops, red cod, rig/lemonfish, rubyfish and scampi. Ministry of Fisheries: albacore tuna, bigeye tuna, blue mackerel, pacific bluefin tuna, skipjack tuna, southern bluefin tuna and swordfish. John Holdsworth: gemfish, striped marlin and yellowfin tuna. Kirstie Knowles: sand flounder and rock lobster. Department of Conservation: kina and skate. Quentin Bennett: mako shark. Scott Macindoe: garfish. Jim Mikoz: yellow-eyed mullet. Forest & Bird: arrow squid, dark ghost shark, orange roughy, smooth oreo, packhorse lobster, paddle crabs, stargazer and white warehou.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Review of Biological and Ecological Information from Fisheries Research in the South East Marine Region
    TARGETED REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION FROM FISHERIES RESEARCH IN THE SOUTH EAST MARINE REGION FINAL REPORT B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley, M. Green and K. Phillips December 2002 Client: National Oceans Office Targeted review of biological and ecological information from fisheries research in the South East Marine Region Final Report B. D. Bruce, R. Bradford, R. Daley M. Green and K. Phillips* CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart * National Oceans Office December 2002 2 Table of Contents: Table of Contents:...................................................................................................................................3 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................5 Objective of review.............................................................................................................................5 Structure of review..............................................................................................................................5 Format.................................................................................................................................................6 General ecological/biological issues and uncertainties for the South East Marine Region ....................9 Specific fishery and key species accounts ............................................................................................10 South East Fishery (SEF) including the South East Trawl
    [Show full text]
  • Ryan KL, Wise BS, Hall NG, Pollock KH, Sulin EH, Gaughan DJ (2013)
    Fisheries Research Report No. 249, 2013 An integrated system to survey boat-based recreational fishing in Western Australia 2011/12 K.L. Ryan, B.S. Wise, N.G. Hall, K.H. Pollock, E.H. Sulin and D.J. Gaughan Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Ryan KL, Wise BS, Hall NG, Pollock KH, Sulin EH, Gaughan DJ (2013). An integrated system to survey boat- based recreational fishing in Western Australia 2011/12. Fisheries Research Report No. 249, Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. 168pp. Enquiries: WA Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920 Tel: +61 8 9203 0111 Email: [email protected] Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 A complete list of Fisheries Research Reports is available online at www.fish.wa.gov.au © Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. September 2013. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 978-1-921845-71-3 ii Fisheries Research Report [Western Australia] No. 249, 2013 Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Importance of recreational fishing in WA .............................................................. 3 1.2 Need for recreational fishing information .............................................................. 3 1.3 Recreational fishing surveys in Australia ............................................................... 4 1.4 Recreational fishing surveys
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019
    Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Family Family/Com Species Species Common Notes mon Name Name Acanthuridae Surgeonfishe Acanthurus Eyestripe close s dussumieri Surgeonfish to southern li mit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Orangebloch close to olivaceus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Convict close to triostegus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Yellowmask xanthopterus Surgeonfish Acanthuridae Paracanthurus Blue Tang not included hepatus in species count Acanthuridae Prionurus Spotted Sawtail maculatus Acanthuridae Prionurus Australian Sawtail microlepidotus Ambassidae Glassfishes Ambassis Port Jackson jacksoniensis glassfish Ambassidae Ambassis marianus Estuary Glassfish Anguillidae Freshwater Anguilla australis Shortfin Eel Eels Anguillidae Anguilla reinhardtii Longfinned Eel Antennariidae Anglerfishes Antennarius Freckled Anglerfish southern limit coccineus Antennariidae Antennarius Giant Anglerfish close to commerson southen limit Antennariidae Antennarius Shaggy Anglerfish southern limit hispidus Antennariidae Antennarius pictus Painted Anglerfish Antennariidae Antennarius striatus Striate Anglerfish Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Antennariidae Histrio histrio Sargassum close to Anglerfish southen limit Antennariidae Porophryne Red-fingered erythrodactylus Anglerfish Aploactinidae Velvetfishes Aploactisoma Southern Velvetfish milesii Aploactinidae Cocotropus Patchwork microps Velvetfish Aploactinidae Paraploactis Bearded Velvetfish trachyderma Aplodactylidae Seacarps Aplodactylus Rock Cale
    [Show full text]
  • A Sampling Programme to Construct and Quantify Fish Food-Webs on the Chatham Rise
    A sampling programme to construct and quantify fish food-webs on the Chatham Rise Mary Livingston Matt Pinkerton Final Research Report for Ministry of Fisheries Research Project ENV2002-07 Objective 1 National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research September 2004 Final Research Report Report Title: A sampling programme to construct and quantify food-webs on the Chatham Rise Authors: Mary Livingston, Matt Pinkerton 1. Date: 23 September 2004 2. Contractor: NIWA 3. Project Title: Energetics and trophic relationships of fish and invertebrate species. 4. Project Code: ENV2002-07 5. Project Leader: Dr Mary Livingston 6. Duration of Project: Start date: March 2003 Completion date: September 2004 7. Executive Summary The energetics and trophic interactions of fish and invertebrates are not well studied in New Zealand, particularly in offshore fish communities. This report presents the rationale for determining the diet of hoki and other species that form 95% of the middle depth fish biomass on the Chatham Rise, an area of relatively high commercial fishing activity, rich biodiversity and high productivity. The ontogenetic, seasonal, annual, and spatial variation in predator-prey relationships will be investigated through the reconstruction of fish diet compositions and daily consumption for major predators, based primarily on stomach contents of fish on the Chatham Rise. The resulting information will provide baseline biological information on the feeding habits and annual consumption rates of the more abundant fish species found in middle depths (200-800 m) on the Chatham Rise. This diet composition and consumption information will be used to estimate dietary overlap and potential competition between predators. It will also be used as input to ecosystem models that describe temporal and spatial variation in energy fluxes on the Chatham Rise.
    [Show full text]
  • 15.2 Sand Islands and Shoals
    15 Islands 15.2 Sand Islands and Shoals Figure 15.1: (A) Aerial view of Troubridge Island and surrounding Troubridge Shoals: (c) Coastal Protection Branch, DEWNR. (B). Troubridge Island: (c) W. Bonham, Lighthouses of Australia. Asset Sand Islands and Shoals Description A crest of sand which rises above water level from a broad marine sand bank, forming an unstable sand island - Troubridge Island - which changes shape and size over time. The island is about 5m high at high tide, and about 2 hectares in area when inundated, but considerable larger at low tide. The island is surrounded by shallow sand embankments (Troubridge Shoals). Examples of Key Little Penguin, Black-faced Cormorant, Crested Tern and other breeding sea Species birds (numerous species) migratory wading birds (numerous species) abundant sand-dwelling invertebrates - food sources for fish and wading birds Pink Snapper King George whiting and school whiting syngnathid fishes (e.g. seahorses, pipefishes) sponges (forming “sponge gardens”, on consolidated sand) cowries; volutes and other specimen shells Knobby Argonaut (‘paper nautilus’ octopus) giant spider crab southern calamari Main Location Troubridge Island (and shallow sandbanks to the west - Troubridge Shoals) Notes Troubridge Island Conservation Park (approx. 260 hectares) was declared in 1982, and extended in 1986, partly to protect major breeding colonies of several seabird species, and provide protection for an important feeding ground used by migratory wading birds, listed under international treaties. Oceanography At the bottom of Gulf St Vincent, off the eastern “heel” of Yorke Peninsula, waters less than 20m occur up to 10km from shore. The oceanographic conditions have led to a long-term build-up of sand in some areas, including the creation of Troubridge Island, a sand island about 7km east of Sultana Point.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Bioregion South Coast Bioregion
    SOUTH COAST BIOREGION SOUTH COAST BIOREGION ABOUT THE BIOREGION The continental shelf waters of the South Coast to Israelite Bay is characterised by white sand Bioregion (South Coast Overview Figure 1) are beaches separated by high granite headlands. East generally temperate but low in nutrients, due to of Israelite Bay, there are long sandy beaches the seasonal winter presence of the tail of the backed by large sand dunes, an extensive length tropical Leeuwin Current and limited terrestrial (160km) of high limestone cliffs and mixed arid run-off. Sea surface temperatures typically range coastline to the South Australian border. There are from approximately 15°C to 21°C, which is warmer few large areas of protected water along the South than would normally be expected in these Coast, the exceptions being around Albany and in latitudes due to the influence of the Leeuwin the Recherche Archipelago off Esperance. Current. The effect of the Leeuwin Current, Along the western section of the coastline that particularly west of Albany, limits winter minimum receives significant winter rainfall, there are temperatures (away from terrestrial effects along numerous estuaries fed by winter-flowing rivers. the beaches) to about 16 to 17°C. Summer water Several of these, such as Walpole/Nornalup Inlet temperatures in 2012/13 were at a record high, and Oyster Harbour, are permanently open, but which may affect the recruitment of some species. most are closed by sandbars and open only Fish stocks in this region are predominantly seasonally after heavy winter rains. The number of temperate, with many species' distributions rivers and estuaries decreases to the east as the extending right across southern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Black Bream Research in the Vasse-Wonnerup 2019
    Synopsis of Black Bream research in the Vasse-Wonnerup Alan Cottingham1,2, James R. Tweedley1,2, Stephen J. Beatty1,2 & Richelle McCormack1,2 1Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia 2 College of Science, Health, Engineering & Education, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia June 2019 Synopsis of Black Bream in the Vasse-Wonnerup Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... 1 Summary ..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 Abundance of Black Bream ......................................................................................... 4 Nearshore waters .................................................................................................... 4 Offshore waters ....................................................................................................... 7 Black Bream ................................................................................................... 7 Fish faunal composition .................................................................................. 9 Biology of Black Bream ............................................................................................. 13 Growth rates .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: Reconstructing Estimates of Total Fisheries Removal, 1950-2010
    Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia Working Paper Series Working Paper #2015 - 02 Australia: Reconstructing estimates of total fisheries removal, 1950-2010 Kristin Kleisner, Ciara Brennan, Anna Garland, Stephanie Lingard, Sean Tracey, Phil Sahlqvist, Angelo Tsolos, Daniel Pauly, and Dirk Zeller Year: 2015 Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] This working paper is made available by the Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Australia - Kleisner et al. 1 AUSTRALIA: RECONSTRUCTING ESTIMATES OF TOTAL FISHERIES REMOVALS 1950-2010 Kristin Kleisnera, Ciara Brennana, Anna Garlandb, Stephanie Lingarda, Sean Traceyc, Phil Sahlqvistd, Angelo Tsolose, Daniel Paulya, and Dirk Zellera a Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada b Fisheries Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, GPO Box 46, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia c Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia d Fisheries and Risk Analysis Branch, ABARES, GPO Box 1563, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia e SARDI SA Aquatic Sciences Centre, Fisheries – Information Services, PO Box 120, Henley Beach, SA 5022 Australia [email protected]; kristen.kleisner @noaa.gov; c [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected] ABSTRACT Australia’s commercial fisheries are of significant value to the Australian economy, with the twenty Commonwealth fisheries alone worth around AUD$320 million in production value.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]