DOCSLIB.ORG

Punic Wars Name: Carthage Founded By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Punic Wars Name: Carthage Founded By Punic Wars Name: ___________________________ Carthage Founded by the __________________________________ in the 8th century B.C. Located in North Africa on the Mediterranean Coast Major trading power in the ________________________________________ Traded as far north as England and down the west coast of Africa First Punic War (264-241 B.C.) “______________________________” is the term given to the people of Carthage by Rome A dispute in the Sicilian City of ________________________________ in 264 B.C. escalated into the first Punic War One side looked to Rome for aid and the other looked to Carthage When a Punic Fleet entered the port of the city, Rome felt the need to respond with a larger force to push them out. Each side increased the size of their armies on the island until a full blown war broke out The war was mostly a naval battle with some land battles being fought in Africa, Sicily, Corsica & Sardinia Romans were not great sailors and they lost _____________ ships during the course of the year Rome was unable to take control during the war due to poor Generals and a timid Senate Eventually Carthage accepted harsh terms to bring peace mostly out of exhaustion from the war effort Results of the First Punic War Carthage was required to pay for damages done to Rome during the course of the war and give up Sicily Rome realized its weakness in naval combat and in response, created the _______________________ (Latin for crow) Rome also learned how to fight war on a major scale __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Second Punic War (218-201 B.C.) & Hannibal (247-183 B.C.) The second war broke out in 218 B.C. because of a dispute over __________________________ Carthage was weakened from the treaty with Rome but now had the leadership of one of the greatest generals of the time: Hannibal Barca Son of Hamilcar Barca, Carthaginian conqueror of ____________________________ Had a deep hatred for Rome His plan was to invade Rome from the __________________________, win early victories and win over the Roman allies in the process Hannibal leaves Spain to Cross the ______________________ The crossing of the _______________________ was a risky move that was costly to Hannibal’s forces but took Rome completely off guard Hannibal proclaimed freedom to all people under Roman rule but few responded Battle of Trebbia River Took advantage of Roman inpatients Battle of Lake Trasimene Still no Roman allies sided Hannibal Battle of Cannae Yearly Roman Council elections placed two new ambitious Consuls eager to win battles Normal Consul armies are 20,000 strong but the council voted to give each Consul a double army so together they had 70,000 (Rome was short handed) The two were eager to meet Hannibal in an ____________________ ___________________________ battle and Hannibal was willing to oblige The battle was won by Hannibal Carthaginian forces- __________________________________ Roman forces- _______________________________________ Battles After Math The Roman Force of 70,000 was reduced to _______________________ as Hannibal’s forces killed without mercy The Roman ally of _________________________ (second largest Italian City) joined Hannibal Rome retained most of its allies and was able to rebuild Hannibal did not have enough forces to take the city of Rome itself Metaurus River Hannibal called for aid from his brother _______________________ who was fighting in Spain Hasdrubal made his way into Italy the same way as Hannibal but was cut off at the Metaurus River He was defeated and killed by the Roman army a day before he would have met up with his brother This battle established that Hannibal would not be able to take Rome itself Scipio Africanus Won Consul in 205 B.C. on the platform that he could defeat Carthage and his success in Spain Raised an army and sailed for _______________________________ in 204 B.C. Hannibal had difficulty returning to Africa because of Roman forces but was finally able to in 202 B.C. The two eventually met at _________________________ evenly matched at 25,000 men a piece Scipio’s power was in his ___________________________ while Hannibal’s was in his _______________________________________________ Battle of Zama Hannibal looked for a swift victory with a charge from his elephants but Scipio taught his troops how to avoid this With the initial charge a failure, the superior army of Scipio overwhelmed Hannibal Conclusion Carthage again was forced to pay a terrible price for peace in 201 B.C. They were stripped of all their ______________________, _____________________, _____________________ and was made into a client state of Rome with no political rights Hannibal was banned from Carthage and died a mysterious death in 183 B.C. Third Punic War (149-146 B.C.) Even after the harsh terms put on Carthage, it managed to rebuild _______________________ The Roman senator Cato the Elder lead a campaign that said Carthago Delenda Est! (____________________________________________________________________) In 149 B.C. Carthage defended itself against raiding tribes by rebuilding its army and by crossing their territory line to pursue and destroy the tribes Rome took this chance to declare war The war only lasted __________________________ years Carthage was destroyed in 146 B.C. The walls were torn down City was burned down People were sold into slavery The winning general was Scipio Aemilianus( an adopted decendent of Scipio Africanus) This war was unnecessary but it showed the fear Rome felt for Carthage and the memory left by __________________________________ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Descent from Lucius Cornelius Scipio
    My Descendant Chart Lucius Cornelius Scipio b. ca 300 BC dp. Rome, Italy Publius Cornelius Scipio d. 211 BC, upper Baetis river, Hispania & Pomponia Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus b. 236 BC d. 3 Dec 183 BC, Liternum, Campania, Italy & Aemilia Paula Tertia b. ca 230 BC, Rome, Italy d. 163/164 BC Cornelia Scipionis Africana Major b. ca 201 BC & Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum m. ca 184 BC Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio Pontifex Maximus b. 183 BC, Pergamon, Asia Minor d. 132 BC, Pergamon, Asia Minor Cornelia Scipionis Drusus II b. 153 BC d. 89 BC & Marcus Livius Drusa d. 108 BC Livia Drusa b. ca 120 BC d. ca 92 BC & Marcus Porcius Cato d. 118 BC Marcus Porcius Cato Catonis Minor Uticensis b. 95 BC, Rome, Italy d. Apr 46 BC, Utica, Italy & Atilia Uticensis m. ca 73 BC Porcia Catonis b. 72 BC d. 42 BC & Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus b. 102 BC, Rome, Italy d. 48 BC, Corcyra (Corfu), Greece m. btw 58 and 53 BC Gaius Calpurnius Bibulus b. 55 BC d. 35 & Domitia b. 50 BC Domitia Calvina b. 35 BC, Rome, Italy & Marcus Junius Silanus b. ca 35 BC, Rome, Italy d. 35 Junia Calvina Equitus b. ca 005 BC, Rome, Italy & Gaius Sallustius Crispus Passienus Equitius b. ca 015 BC, Visellium, Italy d. ca 47, Rome, Italy Gaius Salustius b. ca 015 & Ummidia Quadratilla Quadratus b. ca 028 Gaius Ummidius Quadratus Sallustius b. ca 45 & Sertoria Sallustius b. ca 68, Rome, Italy Gaius Ummidius Quadratus Annianus Verus Fulvius b. ca 110 & Annia Cornificia Faustina b.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannibal Barca
    Carthage Dispute over control of Sicily and trade routes in the western Carthage Mediterranean had been Result was the three brought Rome into founded as Punic Wars conflict with the Phoenician powerful North 264-146 BC colony 500 African city-state of years earlier Carthage The First Punic War Primarily a naval war Tactics: maneuver ship to ram and sink enemy Carthage: very good, experienced naval power Rome: small navy, little experience Defeated repeatedly by Carthaginian navy ROME WINS THE FIRST ONE Rome would not surrender Finally turned tables on Carthage by changing rules of naval warfare Equipped ships with huge hooks and stationed soldiers on ships Would hook enemy ship, pull nearby, board it with soldiers Converted naval warfare into mini-land battles, something Rome was very good at The Second Punic War "Hannibal ad portas" (“Hannibal is at the Gates!”) Carthagian general Hannibal surprises Romans, leads army from Spain, through southern France and the Alps Invades Italy from the north with elephant army Defeats Roman armies sent to stop him several times but hesitates to attack Rome itself Settles on war of attrition in hope of destroying Roman economic base ROME WINS THE SECOND ONE Unable to defeat Hannibal in Italy, a Roman army sailed across the Mediterranean, landed in North Africa, and headed for Carthage Led by patrician general Scipio Aemilius Africanus Hannibal forced to leave Italy to protect Carthage Defeated at the Battle of Zama, fought outside the walls of Carthage Hannibal Hannibal-the-Conqueror "I swear that so soon as age will permit . I will use fire and steel to arrest the destiny of Rome." ~~Childhood Hannibal Quote Born about 247 - Died 183BC Hannibal Barca (247-183 BC) *Carthaginian general *Brilliant strategist *Developed tactics of outflanking and surrounding the enemy with the combined forces of infantry and cavalry As a boy of 9, begged his father, Hamilcar Barca, to take him on the campaign in Spain Hamilcar, made him solemnly swear eternal hatred of Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    A Dividing Sea The Adriatic World from the Fourth to the First Centuries BC By Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. B.A. Brigham Young University, 2010 M.A. Brigham Young University, 2012 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program in Ancient History at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2018 © Copyright 2018 by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. This dissertation by Keith R. Fairbank, Jr. is accepted in its present form by the Program in Ancient History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date _______________ ____________________________________ Graham Oliver, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Peter van Dommelen, Reader Date _______________ ____________________________________ Lisa Mignone, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date _______________ ____________________________________ Andrew G. Campbell, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Keith Robert Fairbank, Jr. hails from the great states of New York and Montana. He grew up feeding cattle under the Big Sky, serving as senior class president and continuing on to Brigham Young University in Utah for his BA in Humanities and Classics (2010). Keith worked as a volunteer missionary for two years in Brazil, where he learned Portuguese (2004–2006). Keith furthered his education at Brigham Young University, earning an MA in Classics (2012). While there he developed a curriculum for accelerated first year Latin focused on competency- based learning. He matriculated at Brown University in fall 2012 in the Program in Ancient History. While at Brown, Keith published an appendix in The Landmark Caesar. He also co- directed a Mellon Graduate Student Workshop on colonial entanglements.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Samnitic Influences Upon the Roman State
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OPUS: Open Uleth Scholarship - University of Lethbridge Research Repository University of Lethbridge Research Repository OPUS http://opus.uleth.ca Theses Arts and Science, Faculty of 2014 The Samnite legacy : an examination of the Samnitic influences upon the Roman state Doberstein, William Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Dept. of History http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3499 Downloaded from University of Lethbridge Research Repository, OPUS THE SAMNITE LEGACY: AN EXAMINATION OF THE SAMNITIC INFLUENCES UPON THE ROMAN STATE WILLIAM DOBERSTEIN Bachelor of Arts, University of Lethbridge, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of the University of Lethbridge in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS History Department University of Lethbridge Lethbridge, Canada © William Doberstein, 2014 THE SAMNITE LEGACY: AN EXAMINATION OF SAMNITE SOCIETY AND ITS LASTING INFLUENCES UPON THE ROMAN STATE WILLIAM DOBERSTEIN Date of Examination: Dr. Christopher Epplett Associate Professor Ph.D Supervisor Dr. Kevin McGeough Associate Professor Ph.D Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. David Hay Associate Professor Ph.D Thesis Examination Committee Member Dr. Heather Ladd Assistant Professor Ph.D Chair. Thesis Examination Committee Abstract The objective of this thesis is to fully deconstruct and isolate the considerable Samnite contributions to the Roman state during the period of the Samnite Wars. Although the literary sources have espoused a Samnitic origin for many Roman institutions, very little academic focus has been directed towards these claims. Scholars have generally tended to focus on one or two of these claims only as part of a larger argument.
    [Show full text]
  • The Golden Bough
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2009 with funding from Ontario Council of University Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/goldenboughstudy04fraz THE GOLDEN BOUGH A STUDY IN MAGIC AND RELIGION THIRD EDITION r y C ' ' PART III THE DYING GOD V- MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO ATLANTA • SAN FRANCISCO THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA. Ltd. TORONTO THE DYING GOD J. G. FRAZER, D.C.L., LL.D.. Litt.D. FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL MACMILLAN AND CO, LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON 191 I i iqii PREFACE With this third part of The Golden Bough we take up the question, Why had the King of the Wood at Nemi regu- larly to perish by the hand of his successor ? In the first part of the work I gave some reasons for thinking that the priest of Diana, who bore the title of King of the Wood beside the still lake among the Alban Hills, personated the great god Jupiter or his duplicate Dianus, the deity of the oak, the thunder, and the sky. On this theory, accordingly, we are at once confronted with the wider and deeper ques- tion, Why put a man-god or human representative of deity to a violent death ? Why extinguish the divine light in its earthly vessel instead of husbanding it to its natural close ? My general answer to that question is contained in the present volume. If I am right, the motive for slaying a man-god is a fear lest with the enfeeblement of his body in sickness or old age his sacred spirit should suffer a corresponding decay, which might imperil the general course of nature and with it the existence of his worshippers, who believe the cosmic energies to be mysteriously knit up with those of their human divinity.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19000-8 - Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353–146 BC) Paul J. Burton Index More information Index Abydus (Greek city), 104, 242 Adranodorus (Syracusan politician), 336, Acarnania (region in western Greece), 92, 93 337 Achaean League Aemilius Lepidus, M. (pr. 218 bc), 192, 193 amicitia with Rome, 2, 102–05, 174, 181–86, Aemilius Lepidus, M. (cos. I 187 bc), 210, 231, 206–07, 209–16 242 beneficia to Rome, 174, 181–83 Aemilius Regillus, L. (pr. 190 bc), 196 breakdown and dissolution of amicitia with Aenus and Maronea (Greek cities) Rome, 345–51 taken by Antiochus III, 193 bc, 342 expansionism of, 209–13, 226, 232 liberated from Pergamene control, 168 bc, and embassies from L. Flamininus, 296–99 Pergamum, Rhodes, and Athens, 198 bc, Aetolian League 102 alleged perfidiousness of, 269–78 attempts to broker peace between Rome and amicitia with Rome, 90–94 Boeotians, 196 bc, 202 breakdown and dissolution of amicitia with joins Rome’s war on Nabis of Sparta, 195 bc, Rome, 269–78 206, 209 involvement in murder of Bracchyles of embassy to Rome, 193 bc, 209–10 Boeotia, 206, 233, 239 absorbs Sparta, 192 bc, 209–10 performance at the battle of Cynoscephelae, absorbs Messene, 191 bc, 210 271 absorbs Elis, 190 bc, 210 refuses to join Rome’s war on Nabis of Sparta, treaty of alliance with Rome, 190sor180s bc, 206 81, 181–86, 206 treaty of alliance with Rome, 211 bc, 80, 81, and embassy from Q. Caecilius Metellus, 84, 90–94, 185, 269–78 185 bc, 211, 226 treaty of peace with Philip V, 206 bc, 91, 202, and embassy from Ap.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Rome to 565 A. D. by Arthur Edward Romilly Boak
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of A History of Rome to 565 A. D. by Arthur Edward Romilly Boak This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: A History of Rome to 565 A. D. Author: Arthur Edward Romilly Boak Release Date: May 31, 2010 [Ebook 32624] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A HISTORY OF ROME TO 565 A. D.*** A HISTORY OF ROME TO 565 A. D. BY ARTHUR E. R. BOAK, Ph. D., Professor of Ancient History in the University of Michigan v New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1921 All rights reserved COPYRIGHT, 1921. By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published December, 1921. vii PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [v] PREFACE This sketch of the History of Rome to 565 A. D. is primarily intended to meet the needs of introductory college courses in Roman History. However, it is hoped that it may also prove of service as a handbook for students of Roman life and literature in general. It is with the latter in mind that I have added the bibliographical note. Naturally, within the brief limits of such a text, it was impossible to defend the point of view adopted on disputed points or to take notice of divergent opinions. Therefore, to show the great debt which I owe to the work of others, and to provide those interested in particular problems with some guide to more detailed study, I have given a list of selected references, which express, I believe, the prevailing views of modern scholarship upon the various phases of Roman History.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Early Carthaginian Coinage by P. Visonà
    This is the first page only. On how to acquire the full article please click this link. Rethinking early Carthaginian coinage Paolo Visonà The coins minted by the Carthaginians in silver, gold, electrum, billon and bronze comprise one of the largest coinages that circulated in the W Mediterranean before the Roman conquest. They provide essential information on both the history and economy of Carthage and on Carthaginian interactions with their neighbors, allies and adversaries. Carthaginian bronze coins, in particular, are frequently found throughout the Punic world, in each of its core regions (N Africa from Tripolitania to Algeria, Sicily, Sardinia, Ibiza and the southernmost Iberian peninsula), as well as in Italy.1 Yet few accounts of Carthage and the Punic Wars take Carthaginian coinage into consideration, and an emphasis on Greek and Latin literary sources continues to drive the narrative.2 Of course, in evaluating the political and economic implications of numismatic evidence one needs to distinguish from the start between the issues of the Carthage mint and those of other mints that struck coins under Carthaginian authority. Carthaginian coinage did not follow a linear path of development. As the Carthaginians began to produce coins in Sicily earlier than in N Africa, the start of minting at Carthage deserves careful scrutiny. This essay, based upon an ongoing study of Carthaginian bronze and billon coins, will review the history of modern scholarship and current research on Carthaginian coinage, focussing upon the formative period of the Carthage mint between c.350 and 300 B.C. in order to define the main aspects of its output, its relevance for the monetization of the Carthaginian homeland, and the sequence of the earliest issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romans: an Introduction
    The Romans: An Introduction The Romans: An Introduction 2nd edition is a concise, readable, and comprehensive survey of the civilization of ancient Rome. It covers more than 1,200 years of political and military history, including many of the famous, and infamous, personalities who featured in them, and describes the religions, society, and daily life of the Romans, and their literature, art, architecture, and technology, illustrated by extracts in new translations from Latin and Greek authors of the times. This new edition contains extensive additional and revised material designed to enhance the value of the book to students especially of classical or Roman civil- ization, Roman history, or elementary Latin, as well as to general readers and students of other disciplines for whom an understanding of the civilization and literature of Rome is desirable. In particular, the chapter on religions has been expanded, as have the sections on the role of women and on Roman social divisions and cultural traditions. There is more, too, on the diversity and administration of the empire at different periods, on changes in the army, and on significant figures of the middle and later imperial eras. New features include a glossary of Latin terms and timelines. Maps have been redrawn and new ones included along with extra illustrations, and reading lists have been revised and updated. The book now has its own dedicated website packed full of additional resources: www.the-romans.co.uk. Antony Kamm is a former lecturer in publishing studies at the University of Stirling. His other publications include Collins Biographical Dictionary of English Literature (1993), The Israelites: An Introduction (Routledge 1999), and Julius Caesar: A Life (Routledge 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Rome: Village to Republic the Rise and Fall of Roman Civilization Series
    Rome: Village to Republic The Rise and Fall of Roman Civilization Series Subject Areas: Social Studies, World History, World Geography and Cultures, Ancient Civilizations Synopsis: ROME: VILLAGE TO REPUBLIC explores the birth of the Roman Empire, from Romulus and Remus, to the Romans’ rebellion against their Etruscan rulers. Students will see how the American Founding Fathers used Rome as a model for another new republic. This is also a story of the city as it grew from a primitive village into a republic based upon the most formidable system the Western world has ever known: democracy. Learning Objectives: Objective 1) Students will identify cultural characteristics of the Romans, Etruscans and Americans. They will identify how their belief systems influenced their choices and how each accommodated the other’s beliefs. Objective 2) Students will identify what it meant to be a Roman citizen and compare and contrast that to what it means to be an American citizen. They will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each definition. Vocabulary: superpower, descendant, exotic, uncharted, subterranean, primitive, auger, fugitives, province, treachery, intrigue, paranoia, decadence, smoldered, virtue, republic, legions, brunt, idealism, skirmish, empire, muster, laurels, tumult, factions, idealism, forum, defame, strife, vagrants, fugitives, proportion, senate, census, republic, honor, momentous, liberty, codified, envoy, ransacked Pre-Viewing Activities: Choose one objective and direct students to do the following during the program. 1) Have students make a list with words that describe the culture and/or belief systems of the Romans, Etruscans, and Americans. (You may also consider using the Gauls as another category). 2) Have students make a list of words that describe what citizenship meant for the Romans and what it means for Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica
    Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica, own grandson to the great Africanus, serving like a slave at a feast with a dish in each hand! ⦠Cited from The Sisters, by Georg Ebers, v1. There was never anyone in the Roman Forum that avenged his death. Valerius writes of another example on ingratitude being the circumstances around Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio. Nasica had led a group of conservative senators of the Roman Senate to kill the populist tribune of the plebs Tiberius Gracchus in 133 BCE. ⦠"Are you idiotically in love with this Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica, or do you purpose t Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica ┠war ein Sohn des Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus und römischer Konsul im Jahr 191 v. Chr. Er überführte 204 v. Chr. die Magna Mater. 197 v. Chr. amtierte er als kurulischer Aedil[1] und veranstaltete mit seinem Amtskollegen Gnaeus Manlius Vulso⦠⦠Deutsch Wikipedia. Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica ┠Pour les articles homonymes, voir Scipions et Nasica. Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica était un consul de la Rome antique en 191. Il était le fils de Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus. Il a reçu le Magna Mater en 204 et est devenu édile en 197. En⦠⦠Wikipédia en França Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio (ca. 183 BC ⓠ132 BC Pergamum, Asia Minor), the son of Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum and his wife Cornelia Africana Major, was a member of the gens Cornelia and a politician of the ancient Roman Republic.
    [Show full text]