The Education of John Adams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Education of John Adams All articles are subject to modification prior to official publication in the full issue of the Connecticut Bar Journal. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an article and the final version of an issue, the latest full issue version is to be considered authoritative. 2021] BOOK REVIEW The Education of John Adams –R.B. Bernstein, Oxford University Press, New York, 2020. 349 pages. R.B. Bernstein, author of several well-received books on American Revolutionary War figures, now turns his atten- tion to John Adams. Adapting his book’s title from his great- grandson’s, The Education of Henry Adams, Bernstein states that he chose The Education of John Adams to emphasize Adams’s position as the most studious and introspective of the nation’s founders. However, Bernstein could have titled this biography The Tragedy of John Adams.1 Adams was born in Braintree, Massachusetts on October 30, 1735. He spent his happiest hours at his home there and remained a proud New Englander until the day he died. His father was a financially struggling deacon of the local Con- gregational Church, as well as a farmer. Yet he managed to send John, his eldest son, to Harvard College. At Harvard, Adams immersed himself in his studies; his favorite teacher was a professor of mathematics and natural history, John Winthrop, a descendant of the first governor of Connecticut, John Winthrop, Jr. After graduation, Adams taught school in Worcester, Massachusetts. At the same time, he contracted with an at- torney to study for the bar. The attorney proved worthless as an instructor, causing Adams to lose his temper, as he often did, and to study on his own. As was usual for a law student in those days, this involved reading Coke, Grotius, and Jus- tinian, as well as collecting briefs of cases, which was known as “common-placing.” Adams then moved to Boston, where an accomplished lawyer Jeremiah Gridley, gave him formal training, and in 1758, supported his admission to the Massachusetts bar. Ad- ams traveled throughout Massachusetts and became a suc- 1 Cf. Eric F. Goldman’s book, The Tragedy of Lyndon Johnson (1968). CONNECTICUT BAR JOURNAL [Vol. 92.2 cessful trial attorney. He married Abigail Smith in 1764, and their marriage lasted 54 years. Until 1774, Adams was not a revolutionary. Although he differed with the government of England and wrote essays in newspapers attacking the sugar tax and the stamp tax, as well as other aspects of Britain’s treatment of the Mas- sachusetts colony, he considered himself a British subject. He did not call for the colonies to separate from England, but argued against the British interpretation of the unwritten English Constitution. Indeed, considering himself British, one of Adams’s most famous cases was his defense of a Brit- ish captain and soldiers accused of murder in the so-called “Boston Massacre.” The case demonstrated Adams’s commit- ment to the ethical principle that every accused was entitled to a defense. Using his courtroom skills at the Boston Massacre trial in October 1770, Adams employed tactics that included reject- ing jurors from Boston itself and stressing that the British soldiers had opposed an angry, uncontrolled mob. He sup- pressed testimony that showed that the presence of British troops in Boston had encouraged bad feelings between the citizens and the soldiers. Adams achieved an acquittal of the captain and all but two of the British soldiers. Two soldiers were convicted of manslaughter and were punished by hav- ing their thumbs branded with the letter M. By 1774, with the British occupying Boston and Parlia- ment passing what Boston’s citizenry called the “intoler- able acts,” Adams traveled as a Massachusetts delegate to Philadelphia for the First Continental Congress. It was in response to the Intolerable Acts that he found himself unable to pay deference to Britain. This was a gathering of all 13 British colonies, intending to unite in opposition to British domination. To this point, the colonies had led separate exis- tences. Adams had now decided that separation from Britain was necessary. Six months later, at the Second Continental Congress, Adams joined several other delegates in approving a resolu- 2021] BOOK REVIEW tion calling for independence. He was a member of the com- mittee to draft the Declaration of Independence. Adams was instrumental in recommending that Thomas Jefferson draft the document because of Jefferson’s reputation as a writer who could skillfully sell the American position. While the struggle raged in the colonies, Adams spent much of Revolutionary War in France and the Netherlands, gaining French support and loans from Amsterdam bank- ers. In France, he and Benjamin Franklin sparred. Franklin had a worldwide reputation as the colonies’ most impres- sive diplomat. To Adams, however, Franklin was lazy and too interested in fine European life. Adams, again losing his temper, sent anti-Franklin reports to Congress. Franklin in turn wrote that Adams was a good man, but at times was “absolutely out of his senses.” Franklin’s comment was used over the years by Adams’ opponents. During this time, as most of the newly minted states wrote constitutions to replace the organic documents of British rule, Adams came to their assistance with his pam- phlet, Thoughts on Government. Although Connecticut did not write a new constitution until 1818,2 Oliver Wolcott, Jr., then Connecticut’s governor and previously Adams’s Secre- tary of the Treasury, made use of Adams’ writings. The 1818 constitution, with its separation of powers clause and its es- tablishment of the Yale charter,3 exhibits Adams’s influence. After the war, Adams became the first United States am- bassador to Great Britain. Then, after the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1789, Adams’s political ambitions and his desire for recognition for his role in winning independence prompted him to seek the vice presidency, which he held un- der George Washington from 1789 to 1797, and the presi- dency, which he held from 1797 to 1801. George Washington told Adams that his role as vice presi- 2 See J. Blue and H. Cohn, “The 1818 Constitution, Oliver Wolcott’s Draft,” VIII Connecticut Supreme Court History 1 (2015). 3 Adams, in drafting Massachusetts’ constitution of 1780, used similar language with regard to Harvard. CONNECTICUT BAR JOURNAL [Vol. 92.2 dent did not include shaping Senate policy; a sentiment that John Kennedy later conveyed to his vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Further, Adams worsened his standing early on by suggesting that President Washington be given a royal-type title. Adams was viewed as pressuring Washington to put in place an aristocratic executive branch, and he was mocked by Congress as “His Rotundity.” Over the years, there have been several snappy descrip- tions by vice presidents of their role. Adams gave one classic expression that survives to today: “I am Vice President. In this I am nothing, but I may be everything.” On hearing that Washington would not seek a third term, Adams became a candidate for president in 1796. He won the election and became the first occupant of the White House; as such he wrote in a letter his hope that “none but wise and honest Men ever rule under this roof.” Whereas the Electoral College chose Washington unan- imously, Adams won by only three votes. His term was marked by his enforcement of the harsh Sedition Acts, lead- ing to the jailing of some of his opponents. Jefferson reacted with resolutions condemning Adams’s actions. Adams’s view of former President Washington was conflicted. He felt that he was constantly judged in comparison with the regard in which his predecessor was held. Again, Adams worsened matters for himself by choosing to leave Washington’s entire cabinet in place, including his nemesis, Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton, according to Ber- nstein, sought to control Adams’s cabinet when Adams left periodically for extended rest in Braintree. Bernstein describes two achievements of Adams’s presi- dency. The first was a diplomatic resolution of disputes with France, known as the “quasi-war.” Adams was so proud of himself for settling the quasi-war that he renamed his home in Braintree “Peacefield.” Adams’ second achievement was his naming of John Mar- shall as chief justice. Marshall had been a loyal assistant to 2021] BOOK REVIEW Adams and was serving as Secretary of State when nomi- nated. In 1800, Adams lost to Jefferson (in part due to Alexander Hamilton’s efforts) and was denied a second term as presi- dent. He left Washington, exhausted, on the morning of Jef- ferson’s inauguration, returning to his beloved Massachu- setts and retirement. There Adams wrote his autobiography and, after a period of estrangement, engaged in an extended correspondence with Jefferson. They debated the meaning of “revolution.” Were uprisings such as Shay’s rebellion good for democracy (Jefferson) or harmful (Adams)? Amazingly, both Adams and Jefferson died on July 4, 1826, the 50th an- niversary of the founding of the United States. Jefferson was 83; Adams was 90. During the past decade, Adams’s reputation among his- torians has improved, whereas Jefferson’s has diminished, but Bernstein has taken a moderate approach to this debate. Each man had his strengths and weaknesses. Bernstein, who previously wrote a book on Jefferson, notes the appeal of Jefferson’s dashing physical appearance (Adams was short and portly), his wide range of interests outside of politics, his brilliant ability to compose and synthesize memoranda and documents, and his commitment to world freedom. Yet Jefferson lacked Adams’s eagerness for self-improvement and the ability to criticize himself, as Adams did in his diary and his autobiography.
Recommended publications
  • John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France
    John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France David Loudon General University Honors Professor Robert Griffith, Faculty Advisor American University, Spring 2010 1 John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and the Quasi-War with France Abstract This paper examines the split of the Federalist Party and subsequent election defeat in 1800 through the views of John Adams and Alexander Hamilton on the Quasi-War with France. More specifically, I will be focusing on what caused their split on the French issue. I argue that the main source of conflict between the two men was ideological differences on parties in contemporary American politics. While Adams believed that there were two parties in America and his job was to remain independent of both, Hamilton saw only one party (the Republicans), and believed that it was the goal of all “real” Americans to do whatever was needed to defeat that faction. This ideological difference between the two men resulted in their personal disdain for one another and eventually their split on the French issue. Introduction National politics in the early American republic was a very uncertain venture. The founding fathers had no historical precedents to rely upon. The kind of government created in the American constitution had never been attempted in the Western World; it was a piecemeal system designed in many ways more to gain individual state approval than for practical implementation. Furthermore, while the fathers knew they wanted opposition within their political system, they rejected political parties as evil and dangerous to the public good. This tension between the belief in opposition and the rejection of party sentiment led to confusion and high tensions during the early American republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton County (Ohio) Naturalization Records – Surname A
    Hamilton County Naturalization Records – Surname A Applicant Age Country of Origin Departure Date Departure Port Arrive Date Entry Port Declaration Dec Date Vol Page Folder Naturalization Naturalization Date Restored Date Aarnink, Geert 33 Hanover Bremen New Orleans T 11/07/1855 13 190 F F Aaron, Louis 37 Russia Hamburg New York T 04/17/1891 T F Abbato, Frank 30 Italy Havre New York T 08/31/1894 21 71 F F Abel, Frederick 27 Brunswick Bremen New Orleans T 04/19/1860 27 69 F F Abel, Jacob 38 England Liverpool New York T 10/11/1882 T F Abel, Jacob 30 England Antwerp New York T 10/14/1895 T F Abel, Joseph 38 Germany Havre New York T 01/10/1883 F F Abel, Michael 25 Prussia Hamburg New York T 07/02/1857 15 122 F F Abeling, Henry 24 Oldenburg Bremen Baltimore T 09/13/1852 25 60 F F Abeling, John Bernard 24 Germany Amsterdam New York T 12/27/1888 T F Abeling, John Clement 22 Germany Amsterdam New York T 12/27/1888 T F Abelowitz, Harris 41 Russia Hamburg New York T 10/12/1892 T F Abig, Philipp 28 Russia Hamburg New York T 10/29/1900 T F Abraham, Albert 41 Germany Hamburg New York F ? T T 10/29/1887 Abraham, David 74 Germany Havre New Orleans F ??/??/1852 28 70 F T 09/??/1854 10/12/1893 Abraham, Emanuel 6 England ? New York F T T 10/11/1888 Abraham, Isidor 30 Germany Hamburg New York T 10/26/1889 T F Abraham, John 17 England ? New York F T T 10/12/1888 Abraham, Joseph 24 Syria Bayruth New York T 07/16/1892 T F Abraham, Morris 47 Germany Bremen New York T 03/06/1897 T F Abraham, Samuel 8 England ? New York F T T 10/23/1886 Abrahart, William 50 England Liverpool New York T 03/02/1886 T F Abrams, Evan 23 Wales Liverpool Philadelphia T 02/24/1853 7 230 F F Abrams, Jacob 57 Poland London New York T 10/20/1888 T F 08/16/1890 Abromovicz, Jacob Romania ? 1/19/1901 ? T 8/24/1903 T F Abt, Christoph 44 Prussia ? New York T 11/16/1887 T F Achtzehn, Chas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Massachusetts Yankee in the Court of Charleston Jasper Adams, College President in Antebellum South Carolina” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 35, No
    Gerald Vaughn, “A Massachusetts Yankee in the Court of Charleston Jasper Adams, College President in Antebellum South Carolina” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 35, No. 2 (Summer 2007). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.westfield.ma.edu/mhj. A Massachusetts Yankee in the Court of Charleston: Jasper Adams, College President in Antebellum South Carolina By Gerald Vaughn Massachusetts clergyman and educator Jasper Adams (1793-1841) was among the line of notable descendants of Henry Adams (1583- 1646), who fled persecution in England circa 1630 and settled on a farm in the Braintree area, then part of Boston. The most notable of Henry Adams’s descendants include U.S. presidents John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Millard Fillmore, William Howard Taft, and Calvin Coolidge, and Vice-President Richard Cheney. John Adams erected a monument in Henry Adams’s honor in Quincy, Massachusetts. Jasper Adams grew to manhood in Massachusetts. His travels in adult life took him from Massachusetts to South Carolina, where he gained his renown. While his career was spent mostly in the south he was a Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, at Boston, and a Corresponding Member of the Massachusetts’ Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • John Adams Contemporaries
    17 150-163 Found2 AK 9/13/07 11:27 AM Page 150 Answer Key John Adams contemporaries. These students may point out that Adams penned defenses Handout A—John Adams of American rights in the 1770s and was (1735–1826) one of the earliest advocates of colonial 1. Adams played a leading role in the First independence from Great Britain. They Continental Congress, serving on ninety may also mention that his authorship committees and chairing twenty-five of of the Massachusetts Constitution and these.An early advocate of independence Declaration of Rights of 1780 makes from Great Britain, in 1776 he penned him a champion of individual liberty. his Thoughts on Government, describing 5. Some students may suggest that gov- how government should be arranged. ernment may limit speech when the He headed the committee charged public safety requires it. Others may with writing the Declaration of Inde- suggest that offensive or obscene pendence. He served on the commis- speech may be restricted. Still other sion that negotiated the Treaty of Paris, students will argue against any limita- which ended the Revolutionary War. tions on freedom of speech. 2. Adams was not present at the Consti- tutional Convention. However, while serving as an American diplomat in Handout B—Vocabulary and London, he followed the proceedings. Context Questions Adams and Jefferson urged Congress 1. Vocabulary to yield to the Anti-Federalist demand a. disagreed for the Bill of Rights as a condition for b. caused ratifying the proposed Constitution. c. until now 3. The Alien and Sedition Acts gave the d.
    [Show full text]
  • Abigail Adams, Letters to from John Adams and John Quincy Adams
    ___Presented, and asterisked footnotes added, by the National Humanities Center for use in a Professional Development Seminar___ Mass. Hist. Soc. Mass. Hist. Soc. ABIGAIL ADAMS LETTERS TO HER SON JOHN QUINCY ADAMS 20 March 1780 Abigail Adams 26 December 1783 John Quincy Adams In Letters of Mrs. Adams, The Wife of John Adams, ed., Charles Francis Adams 3d. edition, Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1841. 20 March, 1780. MY DEAR SON, Your letter, last evening received from Bilboa,* relieved me from much anxiety; for, having a day or two before received letters from your papa, Mr. Thaxter,1 and brother, in which packet I found none from you, nor any mention made of you, my mind, ever fruitful in conjectures, was instantly alarmed. I feared you were sick, unable to write, and your papa, unwilling to give me uneasiness, had concealed it from me; and this apprehension was confirmed by every person’s omitting to say how long they should continue in Bilboa. Your father’s letters came to Salem, yours to Newburyport, and soon gave ease to my anxiety, 10 at the same time that it excited gratitude and thankfulness to Heaven, for the preservation you all experienced in the imminent dangers which threatened you. You express in both your letters a degree of thankfulness. I hope it amounts to more than words, and that you will never be insensible to the particular preservation you have experienced in both your voyages. You have seen how inadequate the aid of man would have been, if the winds and the seas had not been under the particular government of * John Quincy Adams (13) and his younger brother Charles sailed to Europe in late 1779 with their father, John Adams, who had been appointed special envoy to Europe during the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Historical Society, Adams Papers Editorial Project
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative of a previously funded grant application, which conforms to a past set of grant guidelines. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the application guidelines for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Adams Papers Editorial Project Institution: Massachusetts Historical Society Project Director: Sara Martin Grant Program: Scholarly Editions and Translations Program Statement of Significance and Impact The Adams Papers Editorial Project is sponsored by and located at the Massachusetts Historical Society (MHS). The Society’s 300,000-page Adams Family Papers manuscript collection, which spans more than a century of American history from the Revolutionary era to the last quarter of the nineteenth century, is consulted during the entire editing process, making the project unique among large-scale documentary editions. The Adams Papers has published 52 volumes to date and will continue to produce one volume per year. Free online access is provided by the MHS and the National Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of the Massachusetts Constitution
    Construction of the Massachusetts Constitution ROBERT J. TAYLOR J. HI s YEAR marks tbe 200tb anniversary of tbe Massacbu- setts Constitution, the oldest written organic law still in oper- ation anywhere in the world; and, despite its 113 amendments, its basic structure is largely intact. The constitution of the Commonwealth is, of course, more tban just long-lived. It in- fluenced the efforts at constitution-making of otber states, usu- ally on their second try, and it contributed to tbe shaping of tbe United States Constitution. Tbe Massachusetts experience was important in two major respects. It was decided tbat an organic law should have tbe approval of two-tbirds of tbe state's free male inbabitants twenty-one years old and older; and tbat it sbould be drafted by a convention specially called and chosen for tbat sole purpose. To use the words of a scholar as far back as 1914, Massachusetts gave us 'the fully developed convention.'^ Some of tbe provisions of the resulting constitu- tion were original, but tbe framers borrowed heavily as well. Altbough a number of historians have written at length about this constitution, notably Prof. Samuel Eliot Morison in sev- eral essays, none bas discussed its construction in detail.^ This paper in a slightly different form was read at the annual meeting of the American Antiquarian Society on October IS, 1980. ' Andrew C. McLaughlin, 'American History and American Democracy,' American Historical Review 20(January 1915):26*-65. 2 'The Struggle over the Adoption of the Constitution of Massachusetts, 1780," Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 50 ( 1916-17 ) : 353-4 W; A History of the Constitution of Massachusetts (Boston, 1917); 'The Formation of the Massachusetts Constitution,' Massachusetts Law Quarterly 40(December 1955):1-17.
    [Show full text]
  • Pen & Parchment: the Continental Congress
    Adams National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior PEN & PARCHMENT INDEX 555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 a Letter to Teacher a Themes, Goals, Objectives, and Program Description a Resources & Worksheets a Pre-Visit Materials a Post Visit Mterialss a Student Bibliography a Logistics a Directions a Other Places to Visit a Program Evaluation Dear Teacher, Adams National Historical Park is a unique setting where history comes to life. Our school pro- grams actively engage students in their own exciting and enriching learning process. We hope that stu- dents participating in this program will come to realize that communication, cooperation, sacrifice, and determination are necessary components in seeking justice and liberty. The American Revolution was one of the most daring popular movements in modern history. The Colonists were challenging one of the most powerful nations in the world. The Colonists had to decide whether to join other Patriots in the movement for independence or remain loyal to the King. It became a necessity for those that supported independence to find ways to help America win its war with Great Britain. To make the experiment of representative government work it was up to each citi- zen to determine the guiding principles for the new nation and communicate these beliefs to those chosen to speak for them at the Continental Congress. Those chosen to serve in the fledgling govern- ment had to use great statesmanship to follow the directions of those they represented while still find- ing common ground to unify the disparate colonies in a time of crisis. This symbiotic relationship between the people and those who represented them was perhaps best described by John Adams in a letter that he wrote from the Continental Congress to Abigail in 1774.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Centennial Poster Series
    National Park Service CULTURAL U.S. Department of the Interior LANDSCAPES Herbert Hoover National Historic Site, IA Birthplace of Herber Hoover, 1931 | Grant Wood Cultural Landscapes are geographic areas that represent the combined works of nature FINDYOURLANDSCAPE | CENTENNIAL POSTER SERIES and people. Nearly 1000 cultural landscapes This series encompasses are preserved across the national park system. all seven regions of the national park system #FindYourPark landscape in a park near you. and a variety of cultural Share with us your experience. Learn more at landscapes through nps.gov/culturallandscapes landscape art. National Park Service CULTURAL U.S. Department of the Interior FINDYOURLANDSCAPE nps.gov/culturallandscapes LANDSCAPES | NORTHEAST REGION The Old House at Peacefeld | Adams National Historical Park, MA Portrait of the Old House in 1849 | Godfrey N. Frankenstein | From the Adams National Historical Park museum collection [ADAM 8451] Godfrey Frankenstein’s oil painting of the Old House in Quincy, Today, nearly fourteen acres of the Adams’ property in Quincy are Massachusetts captures the appearance of the presidential home, preserved by the National Park Service. outbuildings, and landscape at mid-century, a year after the death Painter Godfrey Frankenstein (1820–73) came from a gifted family of of the sixth president of the United States, John Quincy Adams. The German immigrants. He became the frst president of the Cincinnati property was home to four generations of the Adams family from Academy of Arts in 1841 and gained notoriety for his depictions of 1787 to 1927. During 140 years of Adams family ownership, the Niagara Falls. Frankenstein’s Portrait of the Old House in 1849 is on site evolved from a working farm of cultivated felds, fruit orchards, display in the Old House at Adams National Historical Park opposite his meadows, marshlands, and woodlands to a country estate with 1849 Birthplaces of the Presidents John Adams and John Quincy Adams.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Book Reviews 307 Pressly deserves praise for his accomplishment in pre- senting this survey of intellectual history, and for providing the student and general reader with a useful summary of the major literature of the Civil War. And, considering the world in which Pressly writes, it is a matter of moment to have this important reminder that honest men may differ in their interpretations of events. Earlham College Harold M. Hyman The Writing of American History. By Michael Kraus. (Norman, Oklahoma : University of Oklahoma Press, 1953, pp. x, 386. Index. $5.50.) American historiography began with the Norse sagas but with the Spanish historians there began a chain of narration that links with our own day, and Richard Hakluyt was to write volumes about imperial expansion before the English began their colonization of America. With this introduction Michael Kraus takes up the historians of the first settle- ments-John Smith, William Bradford, John Winthrop, and on through the Mathers. The chapters that follow, in the main, proceed chronologically : The Era of Colonialism ; The Growing National Spirit: 1750-1800 ; Gathering the Records- Awaiting the National Historian ; Patriots, Romantics-and Hildreth; Francis Parkman; The Rise of the “Scientific School” ; Henry Adams ; The Nationalist School ; The Imperial School of Colonial History ; The Frontier and Sectional Histor- ians ; Biography ; and Contemporary Trends. In 1891 James Franklin Jameson published a sketch of American historical writing, carrying his study to the 1880’s. In 1917 John Spencer Bassett published his The Middle Group of American Historians, chiefly concerned with Sparks, Bancroft, and Peter Force. Not until 1937 when Michael Kraus published his A History of American History was any survey of the whole field of American historical writing available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stamp Act Crisis (1765)
    Click Print on your browser to print the article. Close this window to return to the ANB Online. Adams, John (19 Oct. 1735-4 July 1826), second president of the United States, diplomat, and political theorist, was born in Braintree (now Quincy), Massachusetts, the son of John Adams (1691-1760), a shoemaker, selectman, and deacon, and Susanna Boylston. He claimed as a young man to have indulged in "a constant dissipation among amusements," such as swimming, fishing, and especially shooting, and wished to be a farmer. However, his father insisted that he follow in the footsteps of his uncle Joseph Adams, attend Harvard College, and become a clergyman. John consented, applied himself to his studies, and developed a passion for learning but refused to become a minister. He felt little love for "frigid John Calvin" and the rigid moral standards expected of New England Congregationalist ministers. John Adams. After a painting by Gilbert Stuart. Adams was also ambitious to make more of a figure than could Courtesy of the Library of Congress (LC- USZ62-13002 DLC). be expected in the local pulpits. So despite the disadvantages of becoming a lawyer, "fumbling and racking amidst the rubbish of writs . pleas, ejectments" and often fomenting "more quarrels than he composes," enriching "himself at the expense of impoverishing others more honest and deserving," Adams fixed on the law as an avenue to "glory" through obtaining "the more important offices of the State." Even in his youth, Adams was aware he possessed a "vanity," which he sought to sublimate in public service: "Reputation ought to be the perpetual subject of my thoughts, and the aim of my behaviour." Adams began reading law with attorney James Putnam in Worcester immediately after graduation from Harvard College in 1755.
    [Show full text]