DOCSLIB.ORG

38165 Freight RUS AW 3.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
38165 Freight RUS AW 3.Indd Freight Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Foreword The fi rst railways in Great Britain were This strategy is a vital document in the future developed primarily to carry freight traffi c. Since of rail freight in Britain, and Network Rail is that time freight has always formed a key part of absolutely committed to supporting our freight the overall “business case” for the railway. operating customers as they seek to grow and develop their businesses. The strategy Today, rail freight is a real, and growing, is now open for consultation and we look success story. Over the last ten years, the rail forward to receiving responses from a wide freight industry has grown rapidly, and more range of interested parties and stakeholders. growth is forecast for the next ten years. We anticipate the fi nal RUS will be ready for This Route Utilisation Strategy looks at the publication in spring 2007. entire network, and considers how the rail John Armitt network should develop to cater for the Chief Executive growing demand for rail freight. As it is a draft for consultation, it considers options rather than drawing fi nal conclusions, and has been developed with the full involvement of the freight operating companies and other key industry players. The strategy looks at fi ve main areas – the level and pattern of future demand, the preferred routes of the freight operators, gauging policy, key capacity constraints, and capability constraints. In relation to demand, the greatest levels of growth over the next ten years are expected in intermodal, construction and coal traffi c. Correct at time of going to print 2 3 Executive summary In many parts of Britain, economic growth Despite the unique role of the Freight RUS in electricity supply industry (ESI) coal and ESI Coal is leading to increasing demands on the rail in the RUS programme, the process followed deep sea (intercontinental) intermodal traffi c. The medium to long term demand for rail network. Development of rail capacity to meet is consistent with that taken throughout the Accordingly, the majority of the key capacity based ESI coal movements is dependent the growing demand is a central element of RUS programme. It has involved a detailed issues identifi ed by the study are driven by on the future role of coal in the UK’s energy the Government’s transport policy. It aims understanding of the freight network, signifi cant changes in the pattern of demand in supply mix. There is currently uncertainty to provide well performing services that forecasting freight on the network up to 2015, these two key commodities. surrounding this role and the fi nal RUS will accommodate the aspirations of both freight assessing and agreeing the key gaps with Each of the schemes identifi ed to address the contain scenario testing to ensure the fi ndings and passenger operators to increase their industry stakeholders and optioneering to capacity issues will be subject to an appraisal are robust against alternative assumptions. services, in a way that maximises overall value understand what action can be taken to bridge demonstrating value for money. The funding The majority of the industry’s projected for money and is affordable. the gaps. As with all RUSs a range of solutions of enhancements will be dealt with outside the changes to rail supply patterns are focused are considered in a hierarchical manner The Freight Route Utilisation Strategy (Freight RUS process. The RUS will give the Offi ce on the transport of coal to the Aire Valley and starting with non-infrastructure solutions such RUS) presents a view of the freight growth that of Rail Regulation the opportunity to consider Trent Valley power stations which are likely to as amendments to timetables and operating could reasonably be expected to occur on the the key options to meet freight growth when have at the least a medium term future. Two longer trains and progressing to consideration network by 2015 and considers the key issues considering expenditure on the network. alternative scenarios were examined refl ecting of infrastructure solutions if required. The that arise when addressing what would be Similarly it will enable the Department uncertainty surrounding the balance of coal Freight RUS has been overseen by a required to accommodate that growth. for Transport and Transport Scotland to imports through competing ports. Stakeholder Management Group consisting understand freight’s needs whilst developing Unlike the individual ‘geographical’ RUSs of Network Rail, English Welsh and Scottish ESI Coal: East Coast Ports to the Aire and their High Level Output Specifi cations for the which concentrate on resolving the changing Railways, Freightliner, GB Railfreight, the Trent Valleys future railway and provide the strategic context demands on fairly self-contained parts of Association of Train Operating Companies, the This fi rst scenario involves increases for Transport Innovation Fund decisions. the network, the Freight RUS considers the Department for Transport, Transport Scotland, in imports through the east coast ports The decisions will be made in the light of any role of freight across the entire network. This the Welsh Assembly Government, Transport (Immingham, Hull, Redcar, Tyne Dock and changes which result from the current review is important because freight movements for London, the Rail Freight Group and the Blyth) supplanting some current English of the structure of charges. cross operational and political geographical Freight Transport Association. Passenger domestic mined supply, and a proportion of boundaries. A network wide approach ensures Focus has been consulted at regular intervals Importantly, it will provide third party investors current Anglo –Scottish traffi c. that the freight demand forecasts used during its development. with an indication of enhancements that would The RUS highlights resulting capacity within each of the geographical RUSs are be required to meet their aspirations. A 30 per cent growth in freight tonnes lifted is constraints and solutions as follows: consistent. Importantly, it also ensures that key forecast over the study period (the 10 years enhancements to capacity to meet freight’s ■ Immingham imports: The key section of to 2014/15) which equates to an additional requirements to move across the network are constraint is identifi ed as the route from 120 trains per day compared to the base year highlighted for further consideration in the the port through Wrawby junction and of 2004/05. Whilst growth is predicted in the geographical RUSs alongside the changing Scunthorpe, both in terms of pathing volumes of almost all commodities carried, demands of the passenger railway. and maintenance access. The solutions the greatest levels of growth are expected 4 5 proposed include a range of small scale terminals in the West Midlands, the North Stakeholders have also expressed aspirations schemes including some train lengthening West, the North East and Scotland. for clearance of key parts of the network to the plus the upgrading of the Brigg line. larger W12 and European gauges in order to The RUS highlights resulting key capacity tap into a larger market. ■ Hull imports: The key section of constraint constraints on the Great Eastern and Cross is identifi ed as the Hull docks branch. London routes and on several sections of the Consultation The solutions proposed include partial East and West Coast Main Lines. Consultation with stakeholders is an important re-doubling of the branch, with possible part of the RUS process and we would The proposed solution to the constraints further enhancements on the main line welcome comments on the contents of this highlighted on the Great Eastern, cross between Hessle Road junction and Selby document. Details of how to contact us can be London and on the southern end of the and some train lengthening. found in the fi nal chapter. West Coast Main Line is the development by A set of further minor schemes are outlined 2014/15 of a W10 gauge cleared Felixstowe in relation to access to the other east coast – Nuneaton route with incremental capacity import facilities. enhancements to allow routeing of some Felixstowe/ Bathside Bay traffi c via Ely, ESI Coal: Anglo-Scottish Coal route Peterborough and Leicester to the West Coast This second scenario involves the continuation Main Line. of growth in imported coal into Hunterston and opencast sites in Ayrshire, supplanting Some smaller schemes are also proposed to current English deep mined production. Under handle further growth on the northern end of this scenario there will be further increases in the West Coast mainline including possible Anglo-Scottish coal fl ows. train lengthening and loop enhancement options. The RUS highlights the capacity of the Glasgow and South Western and Settle Gauge clearance & Carlisle lines as constraints to further The RUS identifi es a number of major gauge signifi cant growth under this scenario. Key clearance issues. Again, each of the issues solutions involve installation of a number of requires further development and their additional signals on the Settle & Carlisle line, recommendation will be subject to a positive doubling all or part of Gretna – Annan (and business case. some additional signals) on the Glasgow and Southampton to West Coast Main Line South Western, and a set of possible smaller ■ Clearance of the core route from scale measures in the Carlisle area. Southampton to the West Coast Main The need for further large scale renewals on Line (via Winchester and Reading) to the Settle & Carlisle line is also examined at least W10 to meet forecast growth in under this scenario. larger container sizes from the Port of Southampton Deep sea intermodal The Freight RUS forecasts a 64% growth ■ Further evaluation of diversionary routes in deep sea intermodal trains by 2014/15 for this fl ow to provide operational fl exibility compared with 2004/05, based on continued South East ports to year on year growth in deep sea container West Midlands/North West throughput at UK ports, and some further ■ Clearance to W10 of the ‘Felixstowe improvements in rail market share.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collision. Wrawby Junction. 1983-12-09
    RAILWAY~NSPECTORATE DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORT 2 MARSHAMSTREET LONDON SWIP 3EB 19th March 1985. I have the honour to report, for the information of the Secretary of State, in accordance with the Direc- tion of 21st December 1983 the result of my Inquiry into the collision between a freight train and apassenger train that occurred at about 18.18 on 9th December 1983 at Wrawby Junction, near Scunthorpe, in the Eastern Region of British Railways. 2. The 17.32 Cleethorpes to Sheffield 2-car Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) passenger train was travelling along the Down Fast lineat about 5 mile/h when it was struck about midway along the right-hand side of the leading carriage by Locomotive No. 47299 which was hauling the 15.02 Drax to Lindsey freight train compris- ing 9 empty oil tank wagons. Because a track-circuit failure prevented a set of points from operating and the protecting signals from clearing, the signalman had hand-cranked the points to the Normal position. He failed to clamp them Normal as he should have done. Both trains had been called forward under caution but the freight train driver failed to stop at the signal box. His train was diverted at low speed into the side of the passenger train through the points that had, in the meantime, reset themselves to the Reverse position. 3 The leading vehicle of the DMU was derailed and turned onto its side, the trailing vehicle was derailed but remainedupright. There were 1 I passengerson the DMU and1 regret to report that on'eof them was killed instantly, the Emergency Services were quickly at the scene and 3 others were taken to hospital 2 of whom were discharged after treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport
    Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Department for Transport 30 August 2017 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Department for Transport’s information and use in relation to Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Business Case. Atkins assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 108 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5159267 Document ref: v4.0 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Interim draft for client Rev 1.0 - 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft for client Rev 2.0 18/08/2017 comment Revised draft addressing Rev 3.0 - 22/08/2017 client comment Rev 4.0 Final 30/08/2017 Client signoff Client Department for Transport Project Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Document title Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme: KO1 Final Business Case Job no. 5159267 Copy no. Document reference Atkins Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme | Version 4.0 | 30 August 2017 | 5159267 2 Midland Main Line Upgrade Programme Economic Case Report OFFICIAL SENSITIVE: COMMERCIAL Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background 12 1.2. Report Structure 13 2. Scope of the Appraisal 14 2.1. Introduction 14 2.2. Scenario Development 14 3. Timetable Development 18 3.1. Overview 18 4. Demand & Revenue Forecasting 26 4.1. Introduction 26 4.2. Forecasting methodology 26 4.3. Appraisal of Benefits 29 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Completes Major Work on £1.5Billion Midland Main Line Upgrade
    Network Rail completes major work on £1.5billion Midland Main Line Upgrade May 18, 2021 Network Rail has completed the biggest improvements to the Midland Main Line since it was built, meaning more seats, faster journeys and more reliable services for passengers travelling between the East Midlands and London. In the latest stage of the upgrade, teams have carried out vital work to install new overhead line equipment between Bedford and Corby, as well as improvements to station platforms and major work to upgrade bridges on the route – to make way for electrification between London St Pancras International and Corby. All of this work means there will be 50% more seats for passengers travelling at peak times between Corby and London. The new train timetable was introduced last Sunday (16 May), and East Midlands Railway launched its new all-electric service between Corby and London St Pancras International, providing a sixth train per hour. The upgrade, along with the new timetable, also boosts the number of seats on services across the East Midlands and cuts travel time between London and Derby, Leicester, Sheffield and Nottingham. It’s hoped the improvements will take more cars off the roads, as COVID restrictions ease and passengers return to the railway. Electric trains are quieter and much better for the environment that diesel trains. They produce almost 80% less carbon, benefitting people who live and work near the railway. Gary Walsh, Route Director for Network Rail’s East Midlands route, said: “As passengers return to the railway, it’s great to be welcoming them back with the biggest improvements in a generation on the Midland Main Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Lodge, Sutton Park
    MIDLAND LODGE, SUTTON PARK A history of the building with details of its architecture, its association with two well-known tenants and the establishment of Sutton Coldfield’s Vesey Club in 1888. Roy Billingham Midland Lodge is a residential property situated within Sutton Park, designed by William Jenkins, a Birmingham architect, and built in 1880 for the Warden and Society of Sutton Coldfield. Following the Town’s incorporation in 1886, ownership passed to the new Corporation of Sutton Coldfield, and to Birmingham City Council in 1974 after Government reorganisation of local authority boundaries. The site of Midland Lodge (O.S. Grid Ref. SP 1121 9715) is adjacent to the Midland Gate entrance to Sutton Park at the western end of Midland Road which was constructed as a private road by the Midland Railway Company in 1879 to provide direct access for train passengers to and from the Park for their Sutton Park railway station. “New Lodge”, as the cottage was originally called, had several tenants prior to 1886 when Benjamin Stone, Sutton Coldfield’s first Mayor, took over the tenancy in order to meet the necessary residential qualifications to become a burgess of the Town. During his four years as Mayor, 1886-90, the lodge was known as “The Mayor’s Cottage” which he treated as his pied- à-terre, his own home being in Grange Lane, Erdington. After Stone terminated his tenancy in 1891 the cottage was referred to ever afterwards as “Midland Lodge”. Fig. 1(a) – Midland Lodge in c. 1910 Fig. 1(b) – Midland Lodge in February, 2014 Photograph by Benjamin Stone [Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Upgrade Plan – London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM)
    Railway Upgrade Plan – London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM) 2017/18 London North Eastern and East Midlands Glossary CaSL – Cancelled and Significantly Late. This measures how many trains are cancelled or are more than 29 minutes late at their terminating station. MAA – Moving Annual Average. PPM – Public Performance Measure. This is the percentage of trains that arrive at their terminating station within five minutes (for commuter services) or ten minutes (for long distance services) of when they were due. Reduction in railway work complaints measure – We believe that the number of complaints that we receive from the public about our work could be reduced if we improve how we inform people about work due to take place, and ensure all our staff behave considerately towards those living and working close to the railway. Each route is therefore aiming to reduce the number of complaints it receives in the coming year. Right Time Arrival – This measures the percentage of trains arriving at their terminating station early or within 59 seconds of schedule. 16 London North Eastern and East Midlands London North Eastern and East Midlands 17 London North Eastern and East Midlands (LNE&EM) Introduction from the route managing director – Rob McIntosh On LNE&EM, our purpose can be summarised with a simple phrase – we care about our people, we are proud about our work and we are passionate about railways. Each day, we serve around 20 per cent of the UK’s travelling public, with hundreds of commuter and leisure services connecting major cities and conurbations, supporting regional economies up and down the country.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 15 15 July 2005 Contents
    RailwayThe Herald 15 July 2005 No.15 TheThe complimentarycomplimentary UKUK railway railway journaljournal forfor thethe railwayrailway enthusiastenthusiast In This Issue Silverlink launch Class 350 ‘Desiro’ New Track Machine for Network Rail Hull Trains names second ‘Pioneer’ plus Notable Workings and more! RailwayThe Herald Issue 15 15 July 2005 Contents Editor’s comment Newsdesk 3 Welcome to this weeks issue of All the latest news from around the UK network. Including launch of Class 350 Railway Herald. Despite the fact ‘Desiro’ EMUs on Silverlink, Hull Trains names second Class 222 unit and that the physical number of Ribblehead Viaduct memorial is refurbished. locomotives on the National Network continues to reduce, the variety of movements and operations Rolling Stock News 6 that occur each week is quite A brand new section of Railway Herald, dedicated to news and information on the astounding, as our Notable Workings UK Rolling Stock scene. Included this issue are details of Network Rail’s new column shows. Dynamic Track Stablizer, which is now being commissioned. The new look Herald continues to receive praise from readers across the globe - thank you! Please do feel free to pass the journal on to any friends or Notable Workings 7 colleagues who you think would be Areview of some of the more notable, newsworthy and rare workings from the past week interested. All of our back-issues are across the UK rail network. available from the website. We always enjoy hearing from readers on their opinions about the Charter Workings 11 journal as well as the magazine. The Part of our popular ‘Notable Workings’ section now has its own column! Charter aim with Railway Herald still Workings will be a regular part of Railway Herald, providing details of the charters remains to publish the journal which have worked during the period covered by this issue and the motive power.
    [Show full text]
  • Bring the Country Together
    Annual Return 2008 Delivering for you Network Rail helps bring the country together. We own, operate and maintain Britain’s rail network, increasingly delivering improved standards of safety, reliability and efficiency. Our investment programme to enhance and modernise the network is the most ambitious it has ever been. Delivering a 21st century railway for our customers and society at large. Every day. Everywhere. Contents Executive summary 1 Switches and crossings renewed (M25) 117 Introduction 9 Signalling renewed (M24) 119 Targets 13 Bridge renewals and remediation (M23) 122 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 16 Culverts renewals and remediation (M26) 123 Retaining walls remediation (M27) 124 Section 1 – Operational performance and stakeholder Earthwork remediation (M28) 125 relationships 18 Tunnel remediation (M29) 126 Public Performance Measure (PPM) 19 Composite activity volumes measure 127 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) 20 National data by delay category grouping 25 Section 5 – Safety and environment 129 Results for operating routes by delay category 31 Workforce safety 129 Asset failure 40 System Safety Infrastructure wrong side failures 131 Customer satisfaction – passenger and freight operators 46 Level crossing misuse 132 Supplier satisfaction 47 Signals Passed At Danger (SPADs) 133 Doing business with Network Rail 48 Operating irregularities 135 Joint Performance Process 48 Criminal damage 136 Route Utilisation Strategies (RUSs) 52 Environment 138 Regulatory enforcement 53 Safety and environment enhancements
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford the East West Rail Connection
    Bedford The East West Rail Connection The government and East-West Rail Company are planning new rail services linking Oxford and Cambridge to improve connections between East Anglia and central, southern and western England. Bedford lies at the heart of this route. Cambridge Bedford Bletchley Oxford This leaflet explains the case for east-west rail to directly serve Bedford. We are keen to keep you informed about these plans and hear your views. Find out more over the page Bedford The East-West Rail Connection East-west rail presents a once in a life time opportunity to locate Bedford at the centre of an international and national transport hub. Achieving this will re-establish Bedford on the inter-city network, reversing recent changes and optimizing travel north, south, east and west of Bedford. As a council we recognise the importance of rail and how it can boost the local economy and are calling on the government to support plans for east-west rail through Bedford. The case for east-west rail through central Bedford focuses on three key benefits: 1. Excellent connectivity - locally, nationally and internationally 2. Creating an international business hub 3. Regeneration - boosting jobs and the local economy East-West Rail Company is currently consulting on the future route of the central section of the east-west rail line. Securing east-west rail through Bedford is vital to creating opportunities not only as a key transport hub for both Bedford and the wider national transport network but also in providing key growth and vitality. East-West Rail and International Connectivity East-west rail plans present an excellent opportunity to not only connect the centre of Bedford with Oxford and Cambridge, but also enhance our international connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Fastline Simulation
    (PRIVATE and not for Publication) F.S. 07131/5 fastline simulation FREIGHT STOCK PACK 03 VEA VANS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND USE OF A ROLLING STOCK PACK FOR TRAIN SIMULATOR 2015 This book is for the use of customers, and supersedes as from 13th July 2015, all previous instructions on the installation and use of the above rolling stock pack. THORNTON I. P. FREELY 13th July, 2015 MOVEMENTS MANAGER 1 ORDER OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 Installation ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 The Rolling Stock ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 File Naming Overview.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 File name options ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 History of the Rolling Stock ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 Temporary Speed Restrictions. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 6 Scenarios ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7 Known Issues ..
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Return
    Annual Return Reporting on the year 2004/05 31 July 2005 Page 2 Contents Executive summary.....................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................................................................16 Network Rail’s regulatory targets....................................................................................................................................................................20 Key performance indicators................................................................................................................................................................................24 Section 1 – Operational performance .........................................................................................................................................................27 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................................27 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) ........................................................................................28 National delay data by cause...............................................................................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]