DOCSLIB.ORG

West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1 November 2010 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 9 1. Background 11 2. Dimensions 20 3. Current capacity, demand, and delivery 59 4. Planned changes to infrastructure and services 72 5. Planning context and future demand 90 6. Gaps and options 149 7. Emerging strategy and longer-term vision 156 8. Stakeholder consultation 157 Appendix A 172 Appendix B 178 Glossary Foreword Regional economies rely on investment in transport infrastructure to sustain economic growth. With the nation’s finances severely constrained, between Birmingham and London Marylebone, as any future investment in transport infrastructure well as new journey opportunities between Oxford will have to demonstrate that it can deliver real and London. benefits for the economy, people’s quality of life, This RUS predicts that overall passenger demand in and the environment. the region will increase by 32 per cent over the next 10 This draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) sets years. While Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control out the priorities for rail investment in the West Period 4 will accommodate much of this demand up Midlands area and the Chiltern route between to 2019, this RUS does identify gaps and recommends Birmingham and London Marylebone for the next measures to address these. 30 years. We believe that the options recommended Where the RUS has identified requirements for can meet the increased demand forecast by this interventions to be made, it seeks to do so by making RUS for both passenger and freight markets and the most efficient use of capacity. It recommends help support and grow the economy of the West train lengthening on several peak services to and Midlands and Chilterns areas. from Birmingham as well as several long distance routes which pass through the West Midlands. Some additional services are also recommended on several regional routes which pass through Birmingham along In the longer term, a new high speed line with further development of the option of re-routeing to the region and beyond could improve long distance services between Reading and Newcastle journey times and free up capacity on a via Coventry. The RUS also highlights the potential to link a number of local/interurban services across number of existing routes. Birmingham, providing improved connectivity and new journey opportunities. The RUS considers how infrastructure improvements in the Worcester area could improve capacity. In The West Midlands sits at the heart of the national addition, it supports work to explore a new station at rail network and more people than ever rely on rail Aldridge near Walsall. to travel to and through the region. Stations such as Birmingham New Street play a key role in providing Delivering sufficient capacity for freight to travel an interchange for services across the UK, while the through the region is crucial in supporting the Chiltern route serves long distance and commuter economy and, while the majority of the network can markets between the West Midlands, Buckinghamshire, accommodate forecast growth over the next decade, and London Marylebone. The region’s rail network also the RUS recommends that further consideration plays an important role in moving freight from south is given to developing the proposal to reopen the coast ports to the rest of the country. Round Oak – Walsall line to relieve freight capacity on the route between Birmingham and Bromsgrove. There has been significant passenger growth in the RUS area over the past decade with passenger In the longer term, a new high speed line to the numbers holding up despite the worsening economic region and beyond could improve journey times and climate. The rail industry has responded well with free up capacity on a number of existing routes. measures to support train lengthening, performance Network Rail and our industry partners believe that improvement, and journey time improvements. this RUS provides a robust strategy for the West Work is already underway on several large projects Midlands and Chilterns rail network in the coming to increase the capacity of the network in the West years and I would like to take this opportunity to Midlands. The rebuilding of Birmingham New Street thank industry colleagues who have worked with us is underway and will deliver a world class station with to develop this RUS. a concourse three-and-a-half times bigger, allowing it There is a 12-week consultation period and we to handle long-term passenger growth. The Cross City welcome your comments and feedback on our analysis line extension to Bromsgrove and an increase in service and the options we have recommended to feed into frequency between Birmingham New Street and the final RUS which will be published in May 2011. Redditch will deliver significant improvements on one of the busiest commuter routes in the region. On the Chiltern route, the Evergreen 3 project will deliver more Paul Plummer capacity and significant journey time improvements Director, Planning and Development 3 Executive summary Introduction The West Midlands and Chilterns rail network covers an extensive geographical area and serves a diverse range of markets including local commuting into the key employment locations, interurban travel between major urban centres, and long distance journeys within the RUS area and beyond its geographical boundaries. Scope and background The West Midlands rail routes are at the centre of the national rail network, with Birmingham central The West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation stations acting as hubs supporting interchange Strategy (RUS) is the penultimate of the first to many destinations across the United Kingdom. generation geographical RUSs developed by the rail Services across the West Midlands are promoted industry. It considers the requirements that will be and developed by West Midlands Integrated placed upon the rail network over a planning horizon Transport Authority (Centro). of 30 years, and makes recommendations based on a detailed analysis of passenger and freight demand. The Chiltern Main Line serves long distance markets between the West Midlands and London The West Midlands and Chilterns RUS interfaces Marylebone and supports local commuter and with other parts of the rail network which have been interurban travel to key destinations on the route. covered in other RUSs, primarily the East Midlands, Great Western, and West Coast Main Line RUSs. A considerable number of freight flows also operate Its geographical scope broadly consists of the across the network and to significant freight West Midlands region and the Chiltern Main terminals within the RUS area. Line which traverse a large number of significant All passenger and freight services that spend all or towns and cities. It includes the route between part of their journey on the routes contained within London Marylebone and Aylesbury Vale Parkway, the RUS area are considered by this strategy. incorporating part of London Underground Limited’s Metropolitan Line. 4 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation November 2010 Committed schemes Passenger and freight demand The RUS baseline comprises a number of committed There has been considerable growth in passenger schemes which will deliver improvements to the rail journeys in the RUS area over the past decade, current infrastructure and services in the RUS and passenger demand has remained relatively area. These schemes have formed part of the resilient during periods of economic recession. This ‘do-minimum’ scenario in the RUS against which growth is attributed to several factors including detailed appraisal work for further capacity increasing population, road congestion in cities and interventions has been undertaken. urban centres, and structural changes in travel and employment markets. In light of these factors, and Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control Period 4 taking into account the investment being made in (CP4) is a significant part of this baseline which the rail network during CP4, it is anticipated that this aims to provide the infrastructure required to deliver growth will continue during the timescale of the safety, reliability and capacity targets set by the RUS. the Government’s High Level Output Specification and funded through the Statement of Funds Analysis indicates that growth in passenger Available. The plan includes measures to support demand up to 2019 within the RUS area is forecast train lengthening, service enhancements and to continue. Passenger journeys to and from performance and journey time improvements. Train Birmingham are predicted to increase by 32 per operators are responsible for the development of cent in the peak by 2019, and demand on services operational plans based on a mixture of rolling stock to London Marylebone is forecast to increase at a cascade and the introduction of new rolling stock to similar rate. strengthen services on busier routes. The aim of the RUS analysis is to assess that there Within the RUS area significant improvements in is sufficient capacity available to meet the forecast capacity and connectivity will be delivered through demand. A comparison has been undertaken the extension of Cross City services to Bromsgrove between the anticipated level of demand in 2019 and the committed capacity proposed to be delivered in CP4 across the RUS area. The results show that there is generally sufficient capacity to Passenger journeys to and from accommodate demand across the RUS area up to Birmingham are predicted to increase 2019, with some localised crowding predicted during by 32 per cent in the peak by 2019. peak hours. There are significant levels of freight traffic in the RUS area. In recent years, rail’s freight market share has consistently grown and accounts for an 11 per cent share of the UK surface freight market. and more frequent services to Redditch, and the The RUS aims to assess that freight demand is major Birmingham Gateway scheme which will accommodated during the planning horizon being rebuild Birmingham New Street station, doubling its considered.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rf LTW Chiltern Response
    campaigning by the Railway Development Society Limited Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes Response from Railfuture 1. Introduction Railfuture is pleased to respond to the London TravelWatch document regarding the Development of Train Services for Chiltern Routes. Our comments will be brief and to the point. Railfuture is the campaigning name of the Railway Development Society Limited, a (not for profit) Limited Company organised in England as twelve regional branches plus two national branches in Scotland and Wales. This coordinated response has been compiled by Railfuture London & South East, and has been agreed with Railfuture Thames Valley for those sections of line in their area (Amersham to Aylesbury and West Ruislip to Bicester North). 2. General Comments Railfuture welcomes the initiative from LTW to suggest ways of raising standards of service on Chiltern Railways services in London and South East. We note the work that has gone into gathering the detail on network capacity and existing services. Chiltern is unique for a number of reasons: its close working relationship and shared infrastructure with London Underground (LU) on the Aylesbury Line; the close proximity of other LU and London Bus services to many Chiltern ‘metro’ stations on the High Wycombe line; the close mix of short and medium distance commuter traffic and the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone. It is equally unique for the impressive increase in patronage generated by reliable modern rolling stock and infrastructure; the benefits of a long-term franchise agreement and an imaginative customer oriented professional management team. It is also inhibited by many of the factors that make it unique! These range from the poor interchange facilities at Marylebone, to a lack of infrastructure between Wembley and West Ruislip.
    [Show full text]
  • Dudleywinter Alesfayre2019
    DUDLEY & SOUTH STAFFS CAMRA PRESENTS DUDLEY WINTER A L E S FAYRE 2 019 COMMEMORATING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MOON LANDING The beer has landed! AF 1 DW 9 DUDLEY WINTER ALES FAYRE 19 The beer has landed! Thursday 28 November 5.30-11pm Friday 29 November 12noon-11pm Saturday 30 November 12noon-11pm Organised by the Campaign for Real Ale Sponsored by Holden’s Brewery OFFICIAL PROGRAMME Welcome to Dudley Winter Ales Fayre 2019 Firstly, welcome to Dudley Winter Ales Fayre 2019 (DWAF19), sponsored by Holden’s Brewery of Woodsetton; a special thanks for all the brewery’s help. Once again, we are lucky enough to be hosted by Dudley Town Hall. A big thank you to all the staff and their continuing hard work to make our Beer Festival such a success. As always DWAF is run completely by volunteers; we started planning the festival in June, but really it never stops. Special thanks go to all the volunteers and their undying loyalty to putting on such a long running festival. The set up started on Monday morning and in a few short hours the setup, cooling and cellar teams created the largest bar in Dudley at the grade 2 listed Town Hall. Again, this year, the beer selection team has tried to choose a varied range of beer and cider. Some local breweries are featured along with some lesser known breweries. We again feature a Key Keg Bar and Foreign Beer Fridge. DWAF is once again judging several competitions including the Champion Beer of the West Midlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future
    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Capacity Statement
    Framework Capacity Statement Network Rail December 2016 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 1 Contents 1. Purpose 1.1 Purpose 4 2. National overview 2.1 Infrastructure covered by this statement 6 2.2 Framework agreements in Great Britain 7 2.3 Capacity allocation in Great Britain 9 2.4 National capacity overview – who operates where 10 2.5 National capacity overview – who operates when 16 3. Network Rail’s Routes 3.1 Anglia Route 19 3.2 London North East & East Midlands Route 20 3.3 London North Western Route 22 3.4 Scotland Route 24 3.5 South East Route 25 3.6 Wales Routes 27 3.7 Wessex Route 28 3.8 Western Route 29 4. Sub-route and cross-route data 4.1 Strategic Routes / Strategic Route Sections 31 4.2 Constant Traffic Sections 36 Annex: consultation on alternative approaches A.1 Questions of interpretation of the requirement 39 A.2 Potential solutions 40 A.3 Questions for stakeholders 40 Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 2 1. Purpose Network Rail Framework Capacity Statement December 2016 3 1.1 Purpose the form in which data may be presented. The contracts containing the access rights are publicly available elsewhere, and links are provided in This statement is published alongside Network Rail’s Network Statement section 2.2. However, the way in which the rights are described when in order to meet the requirements of European Commission Implementing combined on the geography of the railway network, and over time, to meet Regulation (EU) 2016/545 of 7 April 2016 on procedures and criteria the requirements of the regulation, is open to some interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Party Funding
    THIRD PARTY FUNDING IS WORKING IAN BAXTER, Strategy Director at SLC Rail, cheers enterprising local authorities and other third parties making things happen on Britain’s complex railway n 20 January 1961, John F. Kennedy used being delivered as central government seeks be up to them to lead change, work out how his inaugural speech as US President more external investment in the railway. to deliver it and lever in external investment Oto encourage a change in the way of into the railway. It is no longer safe to assume thinking of the citizens he was to serve. ‘Ask DEVOLUTION that central government, Network Rail or not what your country can do for you,’ intoned So, the theme today is: ‘Ask not what the train operators will do this for them. JFK, ‘but what you can do for your country.’ the railway can do for you but what However, it hardly needs to be said, least of Such a radical suggestion neatly sums up you can do for the railway’. all to those newly empowered local railway the similar change of approach represented Central government will sponsor, develop, promoters themselves, enthusiastic or sceptical, collectively by the Department for Transport’s fund and deliver strategic railway projects that the railway is a complex entity. That March 2018 ‘Rail Network Enhancements required for UK plc, such as High Speed 2, applies not only in its geographical reach, Pipeline’ (RNEP) process, Network Rail’s ‘Open for electrification, long-distance rolling stock scale and infrastructure, but also in its regularly Business’ initiative and the ongoing progress of replacement or regeneration at major stations reviewed post-privatisation organisation, often devolution of railway planning and investment like London Bridge, Reading or Birmingham New competing or contradictory objectives, multiple to the Scottish and Welsh governments, Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Passengers Charter January 2021
    Passenger’s Charter Our promise to keep our promises. Valid from January 2021 chilternrailways.co.uk Contents Getting in touch with us How to provide feedback Chiltern Railways Customer Services, Banbury ICC, Merton Street, Banbury, Oxfordshire OX16 4RN Getting in touch with us 1 Tel: 03456 005 165 Mondays to Fridays, 0830 to 1730. Introduction 2 Fax: 01926 729 914 How to find out information 2 www.chilternrailways.co.uk FREEPOST Chiltern Railways Online and by phone 2 Twitter: @chilternrailway Facebook: Chiltern Railways In person 2 Not all of the stations we call at are run Tickets 3 by Chiltern Railways. If the matter Buying in person 3 concerns one of the stations below, you should contact the relevant Train Buying online 3 Company. Buying by telephone 3 Stations from Widney Manor to Discounted tickets 3 Kidderminster inclusive (except Solihull and Birmingham Moor St which are run Oyster cards 3-4 by Chiltern), and from Claverdon to Stratford-upon-Avon inclusive are run by Ticket refunds 4-5 West Midlands Railway. Contact Penalty fares 5 their Customer Relations at Freepost WEST MIDLANDS RAIL Route network map 6 CUSTOMER RELATIONS Tel: 0333 311 0039 Train punctuality and reliability 7 www.westmidlandsrailway.com Void days compensation 7 Stations from Harrow-on-the-Hill to Useful information 7 Amersham inclusive and the ticket offices at South Ruislip and West Ruislip Accessibility assistance 7-8 are run by Transport for London; contact their Customer Services at 4th Floor, 14 Lost Property 8 Pier Walk, London, SE10 0ES Our staff 8 Tel: 0343 222 1234 www.tfl.gov.uk Our trains 9 Stations from Oxford to Heyford If your train is late 9-10 inclusive are run by Great Western Season Ticket renewal discount 10 Railway; contact their Customer Relations at Freepost RSKT-AHAZ-SLRH, Planned disruption/engineering works 10 Plymouth, PL4 6AB General information and other help 11 Tel: 0345 7000 125 11 www.
    [Show full text]
  • Clifton Past and Present
    Clifton Past and Present L.E. Gardner, 1955 Clifton, as its name would imply, stands on the side of a hill – ‘tun’ or ‘ton’ being an old Saxon word denoting an enclosure. In the days before the Norman Conquest, mills were grinding corn for daily bread and Clifton Mill was no exception. Although there is no actual mention by name in the Domesday Survey, Bishop Odo is listed as holding, among other hides and meadows and ploughs, ‘Three Mills of forty one shillings and one hundred ells, in Dadintone’. (According to the Rev. Marshall, an ‘ell’ is a measure of water.) It is quite safe to assume that Clifton Mill was one of these, for the Rev. Marshall, who studied the particulars carefully, writes, ‘The admeasurement assigned for Dadintone (in the survey) comprised, as it would seem, the entire area of the parish, including the two outlying townships’. The earliest mention of the village is in 1271 when Philip Basset, Baron of Wycomb, who died in 1271, gave to the ‘Prior and Convent of St Edbury at Bicester, lands he had of the gift of Roger de Stampford in Cliftone, Heentone and Dadyngtone in Oxfordshire’. Another mention of Clifton is in 1329. On April 12th 1329, King Edward III granted a ‘Charter in behalf of Henry, Bishop of Lincoln and his successors, that they shall have free warren in all their demesne, lands of Bannebury, Cropperze, etc. etc. and Clyfton’. In 1424 the Prior and Bursar of the Convent of Burchester (Bicester) acknowledged the receipt of thirty-seven pounds eight shillings ‘for rent in Dadington, Clyfton and Hampton’.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Country Walking and Cycling Strategy and Implementation Plan
    Black Country Walking and Cycling Strategy and Implementation Plan Appendices Appendix 1 – Notes Workshop 1 Appendix 2 – Notes Workshop 2 Appendix 3 – Ongoing Cycling Programmes Appendix 4 – Cycling Design Best Practice Appendix 5 – Walking Design Best Practice Appendix 6 – Future Housing Development Sites Appendix 7 – Walking Audit Template Appendix 8 – Supporting Baseline Data and Analysis Appendix 9 – Walking and Cycling Scoring Methodology for Prioritisation Appendix 10 – Business Cases 10a West Bromwich 10b Walsall – Darlaston – Wednesbury 10c Brierley Hill – Dudley – Pensnett 10d Appendix to Business Cases; Best Practice Cycle Design Appendix 11 – High Level Business Cases 11a A449 Stafford Road 11b Wolverhampton to Walsall Appendix 1 Notes Workshop 1 Appendix 1 BLACK COUNTRY WALKING AND CYCLING STRATEGY Workshop 1 – Monday 22nd February 2016, 0830 - 1200 West Bromwich Leisure Centre, Moor Street, West Bromwich, B70 7AZ Note of Meeting ATTENDEES: Paul Wicker (Walsall); Adam Cross (Walsall); Marianne Page (Wolverhampton); Andy Thorpe (Sandwell); Paul Leighton (Walsall); Simon Dickinson (Centro); Alison Pickett (Centro); Dean Hill (Dudley); Joe Holding (Walsall); Tim Philpot (Wolverhampton); Simon Hall (Black Country Consortium); David Harris (Birmingham); Andy Chidgey (Birmingham); Stuart Everton (Black Country); Richard Adams (Centro / AECOM); Lea Ruzic (AECOM); Averil Parlett (AECOM); Lydia Barnstable (AECOM). SCOPE AND CONTENT OF THE STRATEGY The focus for this work is on implementation – considerable good work is contained in
    [Show full text]
  • A Fairly Complete History and Tour of Aynho Village – Updated January 2017 Aynho Is a Two-Part Name
    A Fairly Complete History and Tour of Aynho Village – updated January 2017 Aynho is a two-part name - ‘Ayn’ is either a corruption of a Saxon personal name, or more likely the Saxon word for a spring or stream. The ‘Hoh’ is a Saxon word for a promontory/projecting ridge of land standing on a plain as Aynho does. The earliest mention (in the Domesday Book) of an owner of the manor of Aynho is Asgar - a Danish thane (knight). He was standard bearer for Edward the Confessor who reigned from 1042 to 1066. (Edward was born at Islip about fifteen miles south east of Aynho, so he probably knew Asgar). The entry showed 3¼ hides (about 400 acres altogether), land for 8 ploughs, a mill and 20 acres of meadow. Why was Aynho so relatively important in the mid-ten hundreds? Probably because of its location high up overlooking the whole Cherwell valley. There were very few significant houses in existence within a radius of twenty miles at that time, and it is believed that Aynho had a substantial wooden Saxon manor house then. For example Oxford Castle was not built until 1073, Banbury Castle 1135, Broughton Castle 1300, Rousham House 1635 and Upton House 1695. The first proper Oxford College, University College, wasn’t founded until1249. Apart from Aynho north of Oxford only Sulgrave Manor is recorded as having an Anglo-Saxon Manor House around the late 9th century. William the Conqueror gave the village to one of his barons, Geoffrey de Mandeville, for helping him win the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01
    Division / Business Unit: Corporate Services & Safety Function: Signalling Document Type: Catalogue Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01 Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source Existing ARTC Type Approvals Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 1.3 03 May 2021 Standards Stakeholders Manager General Manager Signalling Technical Standards Standards 03/05/2021 Amendment Record Amendment Date Reviewed Clause Description of Amendment Version # 1.0 23 Mar 20 First issue of catalogue that lists signalling items and communication items related to signalling systems approved for use on the ARTC network. 1.1 26 Jun 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification 1.2 24 Nov 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document.
    [Show full text]