Freight Transport

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freight Transport House of Commons Transport Committee Freight Transport Eighth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2008 HC 249 Published on 19 July 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £24.50 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mr Lee Scott MP (Conservative, Ilford North) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) was also a member of the Committee during the period covered by this report. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tom Healey (Clerk), Annette Toft (Second Clerk), David Davies (Committee Specialist), Tim Steer (Committee Specialist), Alison Mara (Committee Assistant), Ronnie Jefferson (Secretary), Gaby Henderson (Senior Office Clerk) and Laura Kibby (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Transport Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6263; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. 1 Contents Report Page 1 The Government’s approach to freight transport 3 An integrated freight strategy 5 2 The Government’s contribution to investment in infrastructure 7 Infrastructure requirements 7 The Sustainable Distribution Fund 8 The productivity strand of the Transport Innovation Fund (TIF) 10 International gateways 11 3 Capturing the costs of freight transport and facilitating modal shift 14 Appropriate pricing 14 Road haulage 15 Air freight 17 Rail freight 18 Network Rail 21 Inland waterways and coastal shipping 22 4 Balancing the needs of the freight industry and wishes of the wider public 25 Conflicts between passenger and freight services 25 Out of hours deliveries in urban areas 27 5 Freight transport and the regions 29 6 Freight transport and the European Union 32 European Commission freight initiatives 32 Competition for air freight between European airports 34 The road haulage industry 34 7 Conclusion 38 List of recommendations 39 Formal Minutes 44 Witnesses 45 List of written evidence 46 List of unprinted evidence 47 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 48 3 1 The Government’s approach to freight transport 1. Freight and logistics—the flow of goods into, out of and around the country—play an important part in meeting all four of the Department for Transport’s strategic objectives— to sustain economic growth through efficient transport networks, to improve transport’s environmental performance, to strengthen the safety and security of transport, and to enhance access to jobs, services and social networks. The Government recognises this but believes that primary responsibility for the provision of freight services rests with the private sector. There are, however, a limited number of circumstances in which the Government says it would normally consider intervening: • where the Government has responsibilities for provision of funding or network infrastructure; • if there is a demonstrable need for a long-term strategic planning framework; or • if the market fails to capture its own externalities—such as adverse impacts on the environment, safety or congestion—and Government action can contribute to the achievement of the Department’s strategic objectives.1 2. The Department sees its role in relation to freight transport as ensuring that goods can be moved freely, reliably and efficiently by the industry, while minimising the negative impacts (including congestion, accidents, emissions and noise) of doing so.2 The five main elements of its freight strategy are • investing in network and IT infrastructure required to support effective freight services where it is affordable and good value for money; • regulating proportionately, to minimise administrative and other burdens on industry; • increasing compliance with regulations; • ensuring a long-term planning framework that recognises the needs and aspirations of both industry and the overall public interest; and • promoting, incentivising and/or funding behavioural change where it is affordable and good value for money.3 3. An increasing amount of freight is transported within the UK and to and from the UK internationally: • Domestic freight moved increased overall by 44% between 1980 and 2006, from 175 to 252 billion tonne kilometres. The majority of the increase is due to goods 1 Ev 73 2 DfT, Department for Transport Annual Report 2007, 2007, para 9.1 3 Ev 73 4 moved by road, which increased by 79% and in 2006 accounted for 66% of all goods moved. The average length of haul for road freight has increased since 1980, by 29% to 86 km in 2006. • Goods moved by rail declined from 1988 to 1994 but has since risen to reach 22 billion tonne kilometres. Between 1994 and 2006 goods moved by rail increased by 70% and in 2006 accounted for 9% of all goods moved. Since the early 1990s the length of haul by rail has risen from around 120 km to over 200 km at present. • Domestic waterborne freight includes non-seagoing as well as seagoing traffic, although the non-seagoing traffic is a very small proportion of the total. As more freight has been moved by road, water’s share has reduced, from 31% to 21% between 1980 and 2006. Goods moved by water have the longest average length of haul—410 km in 2006. • A relatively small amount of domestic freight is moved by air but it is of a disproportionately high value. • Since 1980 UK international freight tonnage has increased by over 80%, from 251 million tonnes to 458 million tonnes in 2006. Waterborne freight dominates UK international trade and in 2006 96% of tonnage lifted was by sea, 4% by the Channel Tunnel and less than 0.5% by air.4 Figure 1: Domestic freight moved by mode: 1980 to 2006 300 250 200 Pipeline Water 150 Rail 100 Road 50 Billion tonne kilometres 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Source: Department for Transport 4. The Government has established that there should be greater coherence to its freight strategy and logistics as one of its “key cross-cutting themes”.5 The Minister described the Department’s ongoing work to develop “a much clearer recognition of freight’s role — across modes—in transport strategy.”6 4 DfT, Transport Trends: 2007 edition, 6 December 2007, pp. 66, 68 and 75 5 Ev 74 6 Q 478 5 5. Others argue that the Government should take a more interventionist approach to freight transport. Professor McKinnon, Director of the Logistics Research Centre at Heriot-Watt University, told us: There is no doubt in my mind that we should not be adopting a laissez-faire approach to freight. I think that there is a strong need for strong government intervention.7 6. He argued that public intervention in the freight sector was essential—to invest in infrastructure and to incentivise best practice and the use of more sustainable modes—and that the Government has available a number of “policy levers”. It is, he says, pulling most of them, “some more effectively than others.”8 An integrated freight strategy 7. The Department published Sustainable Distribution: a strategy in 1999 and described it as “a comprehensive, integrated strategy for the sustainable distribution of goods and services in the UK”.9 The overall policy context in which the Department operates has changed significantly since then: congestion on the roads and railways has worsened, climate change has become a much more pressing concern, Railtrack and the Strategic Rail Authority have been replaced, there has been an Aviation White Paper, a Ports Policy Review and a Rail White Paper. The Eddington Study (on transport’s role in sustaining the UK’s productivity and competitiveness) and the Stern Review (on the economics of climate change) have had a fundamental effect on how we think about transport policy. Our Report on The Ports Industry in England and Wales, published in January 2007, recommended that the Government publish an updated, integrated freight plan: The Government has a fundamental responsibility to the transport infrastructure of the UK: its major roads, railways and rivers and canals. Its responsibility lies not only in the renewal and, where required, the expansion of this infrastructure, but also in ensuring that the freight that moves on it can do so easily, quickly and sustainably. To this end, the Government should develop an integrated freight plan as a matter of urgency.10 8. Our witnesses were generally supportive
Recommended publications
  • Midland Lodge, Sutton Park
    MIDLAND LODGE, SUTTON PARK A history of the building with details of its architecture, its association with two well-known tenants and the establishment of Sutton Coldfield’s Vesey Club in 1888. Roy Billingham Midland Lodge is a residential property situated within Sutton Park, designed by William Jenkins, a Birmingham architect, and built in 1880 for the Warden and Society of Sutton Coldfield. Following the Town’s incorporation in 1886, ownership passed to the new Corporation of Sutton Coldfield, and to Birmingham City Council in 1974 after Government reorganisation of local authority boundaries. The site of Midland Lodge (O.S. Grid Ref. SP 1121 9715) is adjacent to the Midland Gate entrance to Sutton Park at the western end of Midland Road which was constructed as a private road by the Midland Railway Company in 1879 to provide direct access for train passengers to and from the Park for their Sutton Park railway station. “New Lodge”, as the cottage was originally called, had several tenants prior to 1886 when Benjamin Stone, Sutton Coldfield’s first Mayor, took over the tenancy in order to meet the necessary residential qualifications to become a burgess of the Town. During his four years as Mayor, 1886-90, the lodge was known as “The Mayor’s Cottage” which he treated as his pied- à-terre, his own home being in Grange Lane, Erdington. After Stone terminated his tenancy in 1891 the cottage was referred to ever afterwards as “Midland Lodge”. Fig. 1(a) – Midland Lodge in c. 1910 Fig. 1(b) – Midland Lodge in February, 2014 Photograph by Benjamin Stone [Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices
    Long Term Planning Process West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices August 2017 Contents August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 02 Technical Appendices 03 A1 - Midlands Rail Hub: Central Birmingham 04 elements A2 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 11 Nottingham/Leicester elements A3 - Midlands Rail Hub: Birmingham to 17 Worcester/Hereford via Bromsgrove elements A4 - Chiltern Route 24 A5 - Birmingham to Leamington Spa via 27 Coventry A6 - Passenger capacity at stations 30 A7 - Business Case analysis 50 Technical Appendicies August 2017 Network Rail – West Midlands & Chilterns Route Study Technical Appendices 03 Introduction to Technical Appendices Cost estimation These Technical Appendices provide the technical evidence to Cost estimates have been prepared for interventions or packages of support the conclusions and choices for funders presented in the interventions proposed in the Route Study. The estimates are based main Route Study document. The areas of technical analysis on the pre-GRIP data available, concept drawings and high level outlined in these appendices are capability analysis, concept specification of the intervention scope. To reflect the level of development (at pre-GRIP level), cost estimation, business case information available to support the estimate production, a analysis and passenger capacity analysis at stations. contingency sum of 60% has been added. The estimates do not include inflation. Indicative cost ranges have been provided based The appendices are presented by geographical area with the on this assessment. exception of the business case analysis and passenger capacity analysis. Business case analysis The areas of technical analysis are summarised below. Business case analysis has been undertaken to demonstrate to funders whether a potential investment option is affordable and Capability Analysis offers value for money.
    [Show full text]
  • Bring the Country Together
    Annual Return 2008 Delivering for you Network Rail helps bring the country together. We own, operate and maintain Britain’s rail network, increasingly delivering improved standards of safety, reliability and efficiency. Our investment programme to enhance and modernise the network is the most ambitious it has ever been. Delivering a 21st century railway for our customers and society at large. Every day. Everywhere. Contents Executive summary 1 Switches and crossings renewed (M25) 117 Introduction 9 Signalling renewed (M24) 119 Targets 13 Bridge renewals and remediation (M23) 122 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) 16 Culverts renewals and remediation (M26) 123 Retaining walls remediation (M27) 124 Section 1 – Operational performance and stakeholder Earthwork remediation (M28) 125 relationships 18 Tunnel remediation (M29) 126 Public Performance Measure (PPM) 19 Composite activity volumes measure 127 Summarised network-wide data (delays to major operators) 20 National data by delay category grouping 25 Section 5 – Safety and environment 129 Results for operating routes by delay category 31 Workforce safety 129 Asset failure 40 System Safety Infrastructure wrong side failures 131 Customer satisfaction – passenger and freight operators 46 Level crossing misuse 132 Supplier satisfaction 47 Signals Passed At Danger (SPADs) 133 Doing business with Network Rail 48 Operating irregularities 135 Joint Performance Process 48 Criminal damage 136 Route Utilisation Strategies (RUSs) 52 Environment 138 Regulatory enforcement 53 Safety and environment enhancements
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Gateway Technical Report, the Peel Group, October 2009
    Technical Report October 2009 Version 2 2 Contents One Introduction 1 Two A functional geography 5 Three Strategic context 11 Four 50 Projects 21 Five Society and economy 27 Six Transport and accessibility 51 Seven Environment and natural economy 75 Eight Establishing the Guiding Principles 89 and Objectives 4 oneIntroduction 1 2 Introduction This Technical Report provides an analysis of the context and rationale This Report cuts across a number of major themes, reflecting the wide ranging for Ocean Gateway. It should be read in conjunction with the main and large scale nature of Ocean Gateway. Sustainability – economic, social and Ocean Gateway Prospectus. environmental – is the principal cross-cutting theme which underpins the Ocean Gateway, both for projects individually and as a headline concept and strategy. The Technical Report is structured as follows: Broad topics considered include economic growth and investment, housing • Chapter 2 – setting out the functional geography of Ocean Gateway; growth, regeneration priorities, social and economic well-being, transport for freight and people, environmental resources and capital, technological • Chapter 3 – a review of the strategic context of the area; innovation and climate change. • Chapter 4 – presents the 50 Projects, and the synergies and linkages In preparing this technical analysis underpinning the Prospectus for Ocean between them; Gateway, spatial boundaries were a key early consideration. As with all major • Chapter 5 – the social and economic context, challenges and spatial initiatives, Ocean Gateway has a footprint that differs depending upon opportunities, and an analysis of key outputs; which particular aspect is being considered. The spatial basis for Ocean Gateway, and a fresh policy approach in its support, are explored in Chapter 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fastline Simulation
    (PRIVATE and not for Publication) F.S. 07131/5 fastline simulation FREIGHT STOCK PACK 03 VEA VANS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND USE OF A ROLLING STOCK PACK FOR TRAIN SIMULATOR 2015 This book is for the use of customers, and supersedes as from 13th July 2015, all previous instructions on the installation and use of the above rolling stock pack. THORNTON I. P. FREELY 13th July, 2015 MOVEMENTS MANAGER 1 ORDER OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 Installation ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 The Rolling Stock ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 File Naming Overview.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 File name options ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 History of the Rolling Stock ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5 Temporary Speed Restrictions. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 6 Scenarios ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7 Known Issues ..
    [Show full text]
  • 5172/10 ADD 1 REV1 GW/Cf 1 DG C I C COUNCIL of THE
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 16 December 2010 THE EUROPEAN UNION 5172/10 ADD 1 REV 1 TRANS 2 COVER NOTE No. Cion doc.: SEC(2009)1687 final/2 Subject: Commission Staff Working Document accompanying document to the report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on monitoring development of the rail market Delegations will find attached a new version of document SEC(2009) 1687 final. ________________________ Encl.: SEC(2009) 1687 final/2 5172/10 ADD 1 REV1 GW/cf 1 DG C I C EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.12.2010 SEC(2009)1687/2 CORRIGENDUM: This text annuls and replaces SEC(2009) 1687 of 18 December 2009 Concern : mainly the data related to Bulgaria and France, as well as the Annex 3 (overview table of the infringements procedures concerning the 1st Railway Package, as it appears on 8 December 2009), in the only English linguistic version. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT accompanying document to the REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON MONITORING DEVELOPMENT OF THE RAIL MARKET {COM(2009)676 final/2} EN 1 EN LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AT Austria m million BE Belgium MT Malta BG Bulgaria NO Norway CH Switzerland n.a. not available CS Czechoslovakia NIB National Investigation Body CY Cyprus NL Netherlands CZ Czech Republic NSA National Safety Authority DE Germany p passengers DK Denmark p.a. per annum EC European Community pkm passenger-kilometres ECMT European Conference of Ministers of Transport PL Poland EE Estonia PSO Public Service Obligations EL Greece PT Portugal ES Spain Q quarter EU
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Act 1998
    Competition Act 1998 Decision of the Office of Rail Regulation* English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited Relating to a finding by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) of an infringement of the prohibition imposed by section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (the Act) and Article 82 of the EC Treaty in respect of conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited. Introduction 1. This decision relates to conduct by English Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited (EWS) in the carriage of coal by rail in Great Britain. 2. The case results from two complaints. 3. On 1 February 2001 Enron Coal Services Limited (ECSL)1 submitted a complaint to the Director of Fair Trading2. Jointly with ECSL, Freightliner Limited (Freightliner) also, within the same complaint, alleged an infringement of the Chapter II prohibition in respect of a locomotive supply agreement between EWS and General Motors Corporation of the United States (General Motors). Together these are referred to as the Complaint. The Complaint alleges: “[…] that English, Welsh and Scottish Railways Limited (‘EWS’), the dominant supplier of rail freight services in England, Wales and Scotland, has systematically and persistently acted to foreclose, deter or limit Enron Coal Services Limited’s (‘ECSL’) participation in the market for the supply of coal to UK industrial users, particularly in the power sector, to the serious detriment of competition in that market. The complaint concerns abusive conduct on the part of EWS as follows. • Discriminatory pricing as between purchasers of coal rail freight services so as to disadvantage ECSL. *Certain information has been excluded from this document in order to comply with the provisions of section 56 of the Competition Act 1998 (confidentiality and disclosure of information) and the general restrictions on disclosure contained at Part 9 of the Enterprise Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1
    November 2010 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 9 1. Background 11 2. Dimensions 20 3. Current capacity, demand, and delivery 59 4. Planned changes to infrastructure and services 72 5. Planning context and future demand 90 6. Gaps and options 149 7. Emerging strategy and longer-term vision 156 8. Stakeholder consultation 157 Appendix A 172 Appendix B 178 Glossary Foreword Regional economies rely on investment in transport infrastructure to sustain economic growth. With the nation’s finances severely constrained, between Birmingham and London Marylebone, as any future investment in transport infrastructure well as new journey opportunities between Oxford will have to demonstrate that it can deliver real and London. benefits for the economy, people’s quality of life, This RUS predicts that overall passenger demand in and the environment. the region will increase by 32 per cent over the next 10 This draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) sets years. While Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control out the priorities for rail investment in the West Period 4 will accommodate much of this demand up Midlands area and the Chiltern route between to 2019, this RUS does identify gaps and recommends Birmingham and London Marylebone for the next measures to address these. 30 years. We believe that the options recommended Where the RUS has identified requirements for can meet the increased demand forecast by this interventions to be made, it seeks to do so by making RUS for both passenger and freight markets and the most efficient use of capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rail Industry – an Introduction
    The rail industry – an introduction About this guide This guide is intended to provide a basic introduction to the way the rail industry works, highlighting its key features and mechanisms. Rail is a complex industry meaning it is not possible to cover every aspect comprehensively within the scope of this document. Below is a colour-coded outline of the structure of this guide. What is the role of DfT? Who regulates the rail industry? How is the rail network planned? Who’s responsible for the infrastructure? Where How can I should influence complaints/ changes suggestions Who runs passenger Who runs freight to train about rail train services? services? services? services be directed? Who owns the rolling stock? How are How are timetables fares drawn up? decided? 1 What is the role of DfT? The role of the Department for Transport (DfT) in the running of the railways is to provide strategic direction and to procure rail services and projects that only it can specify. Responsibility for day-to-day delivery of railway services rests with the industry. Visit http://www.dft.gov.uk/rail/ for more information. Who regulates the rail industry? The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) is the independent economic and safety regulator for the railways. On the economic side it: Regulates Network Rail’s stewardship of the national rail network. Licences operators of railway assets. Approves track, station, light maintenance depot access. Investigates potential breaches of the Competition Act 1998 (alongside the Office of Fair Trading). On the safety side it seeks to secure the safe operation of the railway system and protect staff and the public from health and safety risks arising from the railways.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Structure of LTP2
    3rd Draft 17 June 2005 The Provisional LTP2 Preface by Chairs of MSTEG and MSTPC SU/MISC/TheProvisionalLTP2-Draft3-MG/LS 17.06.05 1 Executive Summary To follow. SU/MISC/TheProvisionalLTP2-Draft3-MG/LS 17.06.05 2 1. Vision and Objectives 1.1 The second Local Transport Plan for Merseyside restates the vision to develop: ‘a fully integrated safe transport network for Merseyside which supports economic and social regeneration and ensures good access for all, and which is operated to the highest standards to protect the environment and ensure quality of life’. The LTP will support the economic development of Merseyside by managing for economic growth through the following objectives (i) provide the right infrastructure to support economic growth; (ii) provide access for all to ensure an inclusive community; (iii) manage demand to provide an efficient transport network and support a healthier community by ensuring transport does not impair quality of life; and (iv) protects and enhances the environment. In seeking to deliver the agreed transport aspirations for Merseyside, the Local Transport Plan will take the following into account. It will: (i) support the vision, aims and objectives of the sub regional partnership; (ii) be set firmly within the wider Liverpool City Region framework and support regional and national policies and priorities; (iii) be realistic and pragmatic in its aims and objectives taking account of the availability of resources; (iv) be sufficiently flexible to be able to take account of changing demands and circumstances; and (v) be responsive to the needs of the Merseyside community at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex A: Organisations Consulted
    Annex A: Organisations consulted This section lists the organisations who have been directly invited to respond to this consultation: Administrative Justice and Tribunals Service Advanced Transport Systems AEA Technology Plc Aggregate Industries Alcan Primary Metal Europe Alcan Smelting & Power UK Alstom Transport Ltd Amey Plc Angel Trains Arriva Trains Wales ASLEF Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland Association of Community Rail Partnerships Association of London Government Association of Railway Industry Occupational Physicians Association of Train Operating Companies Atkins Rail Avon Valley Rail Axiom Rail BAA Rail Babcock Rail Bala Lake Railways Balfour Beatty plc Bluebell Railway PLC Bombardier Transportation BP Oil UK Ltd Brett Aggregates Ltd British Chambers of Commerce British Gypsum British International Freight Association British Nuclear Fuels Ltd British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd British Ports Association British Transport Police BUPA Buxton Lime Industries Ltd c2c Rail Ltd Cabinet Office Campaign for Better Transport Carillion Rail Cawoods of Northern Ireland Cemex UK Cement Ltd Channel Tunnel Safety Authority Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport Chiltern Railways Company Ltd City of Edinburgh Council Civil Aviation Authority Colas Rail Ltd Commission for Integrated Transport Confederation of British Industry Confederation of Passenger Transport UK Consumer Focus Convention of Scottish Local Authorities Correl Rail Ltd Corus Construction & Industrial CrossCountry Crossrail Croydon Tramlink Dartmoor
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification October 2009  Foreword
    Network RUS Electrification October 2009 2 Foreword I am pleased to present this Electrification Electrification has a potentially significant role Strategy, which forms part of the Network Route to play in reducing carbon emissions from rail Utilisation Strategy (RUS). The Network RUS transport as well as improving air quality and looks at issues affecting the whole network reducing noise. Electric trains, on average, rather than in specific geographical areas. emit 20 to 30 percent less carbon than diesel trains, and their superior performance in Approximately 40 percent of the network in terms of braking and accelerating can help terms of track miles is currently electrified, reduce journey times. In addition, they provide though several main lines, much of the cross- more seats for passengers, making a greater country network, as well as key freight links contribution to increasing the overall capacity of and diversionary routes remain un-electrified. the railway. Passengers and freight operators This document therefore sets out a potential would also both benefit from an improved longer-term strategic approach to further service in other ways, such as through the electrification of the network. creation of more diversionary routes. Electrification presents a huge opportunity for In England and Wales, two options in particular the industry, for those who use the railway and – the Great Western and Midland Main Lines for the country as a whole. Our analysis shows – are shown to have high benefit to cost ratios. the long-term benefits of electrifying key parts These options, along with key strategic infill of the network, in terms of both reducing its schemes, are both presented in the proposed ongoing cost to the country and improving its strategy.
    [Show full text]