Language Policy in Brazil: Monolingualism and Linguistic Prejudice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Language Policy in Brazil: Monolingualism and Linguistic Prejudice GLADIS MASSINI-CAGLIARI LANGUAGE POLICY IN BRAZIL: MONOLINGUALISM AND LINGUISTIC PREJUDICE (Received 12 May 2003; accepted in revised form 30 November 2003) ABSTRACT. The purpose of this article is to analyse the linguistic situation in Brazil and to discuss the relationship between Portuguese and the 200 other languages, about 170 indigenous, spoken in the country. It focuses on three points: the historical process of language unification, recent official language policy initiatives, and linguistic prejudice. I examine two manifestations of linguistic prejudice, one against external elements and the other against supposedly inferior internal elements, pointing out to a common origin: the myth that the Portuguese language in Brazil is characterised by an astonishing unity. KEY WORDS: Brazil, Brazilian Portuguese, language policy in Brazil, language unifica- tion, linguistic ideology, linguistic prejudice, monolingualism IS THERE REALLY A LINGUISTIC QUESTION CONCERNING BRAZIL? Brazil is an astonishing country in several ways. It is the only Portuguese- speaking country in America and is surrounded by Spanish-speaking countries. The fifth largest country in the world, with a population of 175 million inhabitants, Brazil is and was almost always viewed, both by foreign observers but also by its own population, as an enormous, linguisti- cally homogeneous giant. Generally, Brazilians assume that everybody in Brazil speaks a unique variety of the Portuguese language. According to this language perception, Brazil is a country without any linguistic problems. This language perception by Brazilians can be considered correct only in the sense that almost everyone can communicate through Portuguese everywhere within the Brazilian territory. And it is also correct if we compare Brazil to countries where there is official bilingualism or multi- lingualism and two or more languages are considered official languages of the nation and where a relevant part of the population is made of active speakers of more than one language. Indeed, in Brazil, almost the total population is constituted of monolingual Portuguese speakers, and the vast majority of them will never learn a second language. But this perception of the Brazilian linguistic world can be also considered wrong if we recall that Portuguese is not in fact the only Language Policy 3: 3–23, 2004. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 4 GLADIS MASSINI-CAGLIARI language of Brazil. Although it is true that the vast majority of Brazilians are monolingual, it is not true that Brazil as a whole is a monolingual country. Following a recent estimate, there are about 200 different languages that are spoken within the Brazilian territory, of which approxi- mately 170 are indigenous languages, while the others are mainly of European or Asian origin. Therefore, Brazil is a multilingual nation, like 94% of the countries in the world (Oliveira, 2002: 83–84). Certainly, these other languages are spoken by marginalised minorities without a significant economic power, that is by indigenous groups and immigrants. Moreover, they have never been recognised as legitimate or even as existing by the media. It is also true that the major TV channels always consider the viewpoint of the majority in their programming. In this respect, the populations of non-Portuguese speakers in Brazil are ‘statisti- cally non-significant’ for them. Their choice is not only economic, but also ideological. The media (including TV, radio and newspapers) have always embraced the idea of Brazil being a linguistically homogeneous giant. Searching for the reasons for the “invisibility” of the real Brazilian linguistic scenario, Oliveira (2002: 83) points to three possibilities: ignor- ance of the truth, overlooking the truth as a result of a political policy that intentionally projects a convenient idea of a monolingual country, or simply pure linguistic prejudice.1 For several levels, all these reasons stand together. The acceptance without discussion of the fact that Portuguese is Brazil’s unique language, felt as a natural phenomenon, has been in the past and is still now fundamental to obtaining nation wide consensus to the repressive policies towards the languages of Brazilian minorities (Oliveira, 2002: 83). Analysing the Brazilian linguistic scenario from another point of view, the three reasons pointed out by Oliveira (2002) can also be correlated to the invisibility of the Portuguese varieties spoken in Brazil. The wide- spread belief that the language spoken in Brazil is highly homogeneous is due probably to a twofold reason: firstly because there are no apparent problems of mutual intelligibility in everyday communication between speakers of different varieties of Brazilian Portuguese, when compared with what happens to different varieties of other languages, like Italian, Chinese and English; secondly, and more probable, because the intelli- gibility is not jeopardised by phonological, morphological and syntactic 1 From the perspective of their results, the first two possibilities pointed by Oliveira can be considered one and the same; however, they are different in intentionality: in the first one, the ignorance of the truth is non-intentional; in the second one, it is a result of a political project. LANGUAGE POLICY IN BRAZIL 5 variations. This fact gives the false impression that the language is totally homogeneous. Again, the image that Brazilians have of their own language is not in complete correspondence to reality. Historically, Brazilian Portuguese is a relatively recent variety of Portuguese. Because of this, there has not been enough time for the emergence of distinct dialects due to geographic or social isolation. In addition to this historical linguistic fact, the socio- linguistic effect of TV Globo (the most important national TV network), beaming its signal all over the national territory and making the country a perfect ‘global village’, has enormous importance into setting a presti- gious variety of the language as a standard for everyone in the country.2 Even with that powerful influence upon the life of the population, it would surprise a linguist if a huge country like Brazil did not show any significant linguistic variation, considering the evidently striking social and economical differences. Although there is no clear definition of what would be the standard Brazilian Portuguese, individuals tend to identify it with the variety adopted by important TV news programmes, especially Jornal Nacional, the most important TV news programme on TV Globo. In this programme, the hosts speak a pasteurised linguistic variety, made up of ‘neutral’ features from the two most important urban varieties: from Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. The final result is a mixture of features that make a good impression upon educated people, with a clear effort to suppress any characteristic that would identify with only one of those varieties. In other words, the standard Brazilian Portuguese promoted by the TV news is not a natural variety of the language. On the contrary, it is an artificial variety 2 Fischer (2001: 174) notes that, after the Second World War, the intrusion of television increased dialect levelling; because of that, “contamination and superimposition have since been documented among large populations of viewers”. In his opinion, “at this moment, television is perhaps the single greatest cause of universal dialect levelling” – referring to the use of standard American English, that is increasing at a rapid rate in those English- speaking countries that broadcast American programmes without ‘dubbing’. But Fischer (2001: 182) also notes that “in a contrasting process, the recent ‘modernization’ of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has essentially eliminated what had come to be called ‘BBC English’, an easily recognizable received pronunciation of the English language that had long been held in high regard. Now, older listeners, be they in Britain or New Zealand, register alarm at hearing in BBC broadcasts what they register as ‘lower- class pronunciation’; they feel this not only ‘lower standards’ but also demonstrates ‘a beastly lack of good taste’. However, such protestations are meaningless in the larger saga of living languages. ‘Superior’ dialects are only a chimera, as special dialects themselves very soon mutate and/or lose what made them special.” 6 GLADIS MASSINI-CAGLIARI and a convenient way to manipulate the language problems in a huge and heterogeneous country like Brazil.3 When a ‘non-Globo variety’ is needed, it is never the voice of the ‘official’ news. Non-stigmatised regional varieties are accepted only as a ‘secondary’ source of information. And the stigmatised social varieties only appear in this context as the voice of very poor people, when they are presented as victims of violence or natural disasters, or as the voice of criminals. It is interesting to notice that the non-news TV programmes, mainly the soap-operas (novelas), usually show some characters who speak with a caricatured variety, by emphasising regional or social accents to the maximum, instead of using an artist that is a native user of those regional or social accents. For this kind of programme, it seems unthinkable to give higher status on TV to regional or social varieties of less importance, because this would be an ‘official’ recognition that those varieties actually exist in the society. This is good evidence that the social stereotypes in relation to language in Brazil are carefully built and strongly
Recommended publications
  • Prayer Cards | Joshua Project
    Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Agavotaguerra in Brazil Aikana, Tubarao in Brazil Population: 100 Population: 300 World Popl: 100 World Popl: 300 Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: Amazon People Cluster: South American Indigenous Main Language: Portuguese Main Language: Aikana Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Minimally Reached Status: Significantly reached Evangelicals: 1.00% Evangelicals: 25.0% Chr Adherents: 35.00% Chr Adherents: 50.0% Scripture: Complete Bible Scripture: Portions www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net Source: Anonymous "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Ajuru in Brazil Akuntsu in Brazil Population: 300 Population: Unknown World Popl: 300 World Popl: Unknown Total Countries: 1 Total Countries: 1 People Cluster: South American Indigenous People Cluster: Amazon Main Language: Portuguese Main Language: Language unknown Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Main Religion: Ethnic Religions Status: Unreached Status: Minimally Reached Evangelicals: 0.00% Evangelicals: 0.10% Chr Adherents: 5.00% Chr Adherents: 20.00% Scripture: Complete Bible Scripture: Unspecified www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Amanaye in Brazil Amawaka in Brazil Population: 100 Population: 200 World Popl: 100 World Popl: 600 Total Countries:
    [Show full text]
  • A Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Cerrado (Jê Family) 1
    Andrey Nikulin University of Brasília; [email protected] A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Cerrado (Jê family) 1 This is the second paper in a series on the historical phonology of Macro-Jê languages. In this work, I examine the sound correspondences between the languages of the Central Jê branch, Xavánte and Xerénte, in order to arrive at a reconstruction of Proto-Central Jê. I further compare it to my reconstruction of Proto-Northern Jê (Nikulin 2016b) and propose a phonological re- construction of Proto-Cerrado, the most recent common ancestor of Proto-Central Jê and Proto-Northern Jê. The paper also includes a non-exhaustive list of Cerrado etymologies. Keywords: Jê languages, Macro-Jê languages, Xavánte, Xerénte, language reconstruction, comparative method 1. Introduction In an earlier work (Nikulin 2016b), I have proposed a phonological reconstruction of Proto- Northern Jê, the proto-language of the branch that comprises Apinayé, Kayapó (Mẽbêngôkre), Suyá (Kĩsêdjê), Tapayúna, Timbira and Panará languages spoken in Central Brazil. In this pa- per I offer a reconstruction of Proto-Cerrado (PCerr) 2, the immediate ancestor of Proto- Northern Jê (PNJ) and the proto-language of its coordinate branch, Central Jê (PCJ). Before proceeding to the main body of this paper, some comments on my PNJ reconstruc- tion (Nikulin 2016b) are necessary. These concern the internal phylogenetic structure of the Northern Jê branch and individual correspondences. 1.1. Internal structure of Northern Jê Recent lexicostatistical investigation has shown that the Northern branch of Jê languages has the internal structure shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Northern Jê languages Southern Kayapó Panará Timbíra dialects Proto-Northern Jê Tapayúna Proto-Core Jê Suyá Apinajé Kayapó 1 I am grateful to CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for providing a scholarship to carry out the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Julien Meyer a Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech
    Julien Meyer Whistled Languages A Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech With a chapter in collaboration with René-Guy Busnel Whistled Languages Julien Meyer Whistled Languages A Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech With a chapter in collaboration with René-Guy Busnel 123 Julien Meyer Paris France ISBN 978-3-662-45836-5 ISBN 978-3-662-45837-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45837-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014958133 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained
    [Show full text]
  • Baixar Este Arquivo
    PAPIA Revista Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares Editores Márcia Santos D. de Oliveira (Univ. de São Paulo, Brasil) Ana Lívia dos Santos Agostinho (UFSC, Brasil) Conselho Editorial Alan Baxter (Univ. Fed. da Bahia, Brasil) Alain Kihm (Université de Paris 7/CNRS, France) Angela Bartens (Univ. of Helsinki, Finland) Armin Schwegler (Univ. of California, Irvine, USA) Dante Lucchesi (Univ. Federal da Bahia, Brasil) Gabriel Antunes de Araujo (Univ. de São Paulo, Brasil) Hildo Honório do Couto (Universidade de Brasília, Brasil) Isabella Mozzillo (Univ. Federal de Pelotas, Brasil) J. Clancy Clements (Indiana Univ. Bloomington, USA) Jean-Louis Rougé (Univ. d’Orléans, France) John M. Lipski (The Pennsylvania State Univ., USA) Klaus Zimmermann (Univ. Bremen, Deutschland) M. Chérif Mbodj (Univ. Cheikh Anta Diop, Senegal) Marta Dijkhoff (Instituto Lingwistiko Antiano, Curaçao) Mathias Perl (Univ. Mainz, Deutschland) Nicholas Faraclas (Univ. de Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico) Philippe Maurer (Univ. of Zurich, Swiss) Pierre Guisan (Univ. Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) Tjerk Hagemeijer (Univ. de Lisboa, Portugal) e-ISSN 2316-2767 PAPIA Revista Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares Volume 25(1), 2015 revistas.fflch.usp.br/papia [email protected] Copyright © 2015 dos autores e de PAPIA. A revista PAPIA é indexada nas seguintes bases: LATINDEX (http://www.latindex.unam.mx) DOAJ (http://www.doaj.org) Webqualis capes: A1 Associação Brasileira de Estudos Crioulos e Similares (abecs) Diretoria 2015-2017 Silvana Araujo (uefs) Márcia Santos Duarte de Oliveira
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policies and Indigenous Peoples in Brazil 1 to KICK OFF
    Talk right, indian! Language policies and indigenous peoples in Brazil Antonio José Silva Santana∗∗ 1 TO KICK OFF THE DISCUSSION... There is no official document which specifically tracks the directives for indigenous language policy in Brazil. Thus, this article tries to paint a “portrait” of language policy in the country, describing the relationship between what appears in documents and indigenous practices, especially in the field of formal school education, extracting from this source what corresponds to the policy for indigenous language in Brazil. Language policy, in this article, employs the definition accepted in sociolinguistics of Calvet (2002, p. 145), i.e., “as a set of conscious choices referring to the relationship between language and social life.” Thus, when I refer to language policy for indigenous peoples in this country, I am alluding to the “set of conscious choices” and the decisions the Brazilian government has made with respect to indigenous languages, manifested in the language used in official documents and activities which might have the effect either of ethnic affirming or colonizing these peoples. Thus, this article includes a concern with understanding the strategies and policies adopted to govern or administer problems arising from the diversity and multiplicity created by multicultural societies (Hall, 2003), such as Brazil. I also focus on the sphere of political strategies used to deal with problems arising from linguistic diversity existing due to the plurilingual situation in the country. I investigate the issue of language diversity based in a discursive perspective, which is perceived as a multicultural paradigm by Semprini (1999, p. 66) because it provides the opportunity to work with language, identifying it not just as “the place where the relationship of exclusion and domination is crystallized, but also where these relations are negotiated, produced and reproduced.” According to this view, language is not limited to ∗∗ Master’s candidate at the Linguistics Program of the University of Texas at Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • Julien Meyer a Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech
    Julien Meyer Whistled Languages A Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech With a chapter in collaboration with René-Guy Busnel Whistled Languages [email protected] Julien Meyer Whistled Languages A Worldwide Inquiry on Human Whistled Speech With a chapter in collaboration with René-Guy Busnel 123 [email protected] Julien Meyer Paris France ISBN 978-3-662-45836-5 ISBN 978-3-662-45837-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45837-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014958133 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic and Climatic Effects on Human Crania from South America: a Comparative
    Genomic and Climatic Effects on Human Crania from South America: A Comparative Microevolutionary Approach Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brianne C. Herrera, M.A. Graduate Program in Anthropology The Ohio State University 2019 Dissertation Committee Mark Hubbe, Advisor Clark Spencer Larsen Debbie Guatelli-Steinberg Jeffrey McKee Copyrighted by Brianne C. Herrera 2019 Abstract Cranial morphology has been widely used to estimate phylogenetic relationships among and between populations. When compared against genetic data, however, discrepancies arise in terms of population affinity and effects of microevolutionary processes. These discrepancies are particularly apparent in studies of the human dispersion to the New World. Despite the apparent discrepancies, research has thus far been limited in scope when analyzing the relationship between the cranial morphology and genetic markers. This dissertation aimed to fill this void in research by providing a necessary broad comparative approach, incorporating 3D morphological and climate data, mtDNA, and Y-chromosome DNA from South America. The combination of these data types allows for a more complete comparative analysis of microevolutionary processes. Correlations between these different data types allow for the assessment their relatedness, while quantitatively testing microevolutionary models permit determining the congruence of these different data types. I asked the following research questions: 1) how consistent are the patterns of population affinity when comparing different regions of the crania to each type of DNA for populations in South America? 2) If they are not consistent, why not? How are different evolutionary forces affecting the affinities between them? Collectively, both the cranial and genetic data demonstrated patterns of isolation-by-distance when viewed from a continent-wide scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Little to No Language Indigenous Latin American Children in New
    Little to No Language Indigenous Latin American Children in New Jersey July 14, 2012 Version 2 Aggie Sung Tang, producer and host of a public access television show called Education Round Table, based out of Princeton Community TV of Princeton, NJ. [email protected] 609-802-8788 1 Statement Many different LDTCs, Bilingual, ESL and preschool teachers in New Jersey state they have come across Latino children described as having “Little to No Language.” Educators stated that these children were assessed in Spanish and not English. These children are as young as 3, who have been admitted to either Abbot school districts’ preschool programs or Special Education preschool programs. Others are in elementary school up to age 8. These children are more likely to be placed in Special Education, because they are assessed to have “Little to No Language.” The three top reasons from educators that explain this phenomenon are the following: 1. Latino parents of these children have to work multiple jobs, so they do not have time to speak to their children. 2. Latino parents have so little education that there is no language to pass onto their children. 3. These Latino children have learning disabilities. 2 Analysis for reasons to “Little to No Language” Getting a better understanding of where New Jersey’s Latino population originate may lend a better understanding to this “Little to No Language” description. The passenger traffic data from the New York New Jersey Port Authority, who runs all the airports in the area including Newark, JFK and Laguardia, indicate that the majority of the passenger traffic (arrivals and departures) involve 2 market groups: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Baixar Este Arquivo
    8 Revista Eletrônica do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Número 8 - março a junho/2009 - V ISSN 1980 1858 Guavira 8 Revista Guavira – Letras. Edição de número 08 Estudos de línguas indígenas faladas no Brasil: uma perspectivia dos estudos da pós-graduação Revista Guavira-Letras: “Estudos de línguas indígenas faladas no Brasil: uma perspectiva dos estudos da pós-graduação”, Mestrado em Letras, Campus de Três Lagoas, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Vol. 01, n. 08 (2005- Três Lagoas). FERREIRA, R. V. (Org.). Semestral (Mar/Jun 2008) – Versão On-line. ISBN: 1980-1858 1. Linguística 2. Línguas Indígenas 3. Fonologia 4.Morfossintaxe 5. Etnolinguística 6. Pesquisa I. Título: Guavira-Letras: “Estudos de línguas indígenas”. (Versão On-Line: www.cptl.ufms.br/guavira) FERREIRA, Rogério Vicente (Org.). Revista Guavira-Letras: Estudos de línguas indígenas . Vol. 01, n. 08. Mar./Jul. 2009. Comissão Editorial: João Luis Pereira Ourique (UFMS) Rogério Vicente Ferreira (UFMS) Vânia Maria Lescano Guerra (UFMS) Conselho Científico: Antônio Rodrigues Belon (UFMS) Celina A. G. S. Nascimento (UFMS) Claudete Cameschi de Souza (UFMS) Edgar C. Nolasco dos Santos (UFMS) João Luis Pereira Ourique (UFMS) José Batista de Sales (UFMS) Kelcilene Grácia-Rodrigues (UFMS) Marlene Durigan (UFMS) Rauer Ribeiro Rodrigues (UFMS) Rogério Vicente Ferreira (UFMS) Rosana C. Zanelatto dos Santos (UFMS) Vânia Maria Lescano Guerra (UFMS) Vitória R. Spanghero Ferreira (UFMS) Wagner Corsino Enedino (UFMS) Corpo Editorial:
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Universidade Federal Do Pará Instituto De Letras E
    1 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARÁ INSTITUTO DE LETRAS E COMUNICAÇÃO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM LETRAS RAFAELA MACIEL DO VALE EXPRESSÕES DESCRITIVAS EM PARKATÊJÊ: ASPECTOS SEMÂNTICOS E MORFOSSINTÁTICOS Belém 2016 2 RAFAELA MACIEL DO VALE EXPRESSÕES DESCRITIVAS EM PARKATÊJÊ: ASPECTOS SEMÂNTICOS E MORFOSSINTÁTICOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Letras – Mestrado em Letras – da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de Mestre em Linguística. Área de concentração: Análise, descrição e documentação das línguas naturais. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Marília de Nazaré de Oliveira Ferreira. Belém 2016 3 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação-na-Publicação (CIP) Sistema de Bibliotecas da UFPA ____________________________________________________________ Vale, Rafaela Maciel do, 1990- Expressões descritivas em parkatêjê : aspectos semânticos e morfossintáticos / Rafaela Maciel do Vale. - 2016. Orientadora: Marília de Nazaré de Oliveira Ferreira. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Federal do Pará, Instituto de Letras e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, Belém, 2016. 1. Línguas índigenas - Fonética. 2. Indios Parkatêjê - Línguas. 3. Sociolinguística. I. Título. CDD 22. ed. 498 ____________________________________________________________ 4 RAFAELA MACIEL DO VALE EXPRESSÕES DESCRITIVAS EM PARKATÊJÊ: ASPECTOS SEMÂNTICOS E MORFOSSINTÁTICOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Letras – Mestrado em Letras – da Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), como requisito
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Aspects of People's Proper Names Onomástica Parkatêjê
    Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 26, n. 3, p. 1177-1200, 2018 Parkatêjê Onomastics: Semantic Aspects of People’s Proper Names Onomástica Parkatêjê: aspectos semânticos dos nomes próprios de pessoas Tereza Tayná Coutinho Lopes Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará / Brasil [email protected] Marília de Nazaré de Oliveira Ferreira Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará / Brasil [email protected] Abstract: This article aims to present semantic aspects found in Parkatêjê anthroponyms. Currently the Parkatêjê people live in villages in the Reserva Indígena Mãe Maria (RIMM – Mother Mary Indigenous Reserve, in English), near Marabá in the state of Pará. The Parkatêjê language belongs to the Timbira Dialectal Complex, from the Macro-Jê linguistic stock. The study of proper names from different typologies is the core interest of the discipline entitled Onomastics, in which Anthroponymy, the study of human proper names, will be our focus in this paper. In general, the significant content of proper names in Parkatêjê refers to certain personal characteristics of the nominator. From a semantic perspective, these anthroponyms can be considered denotative or figurative, according to Araújo and Ferreira (2001). Based on this perspective and the analysis of data collected through fieldwork, it was possible to verify specific semantic phenomena in Parkatêjê anthoponyms. Such phenomena, according to the presuppositions of Cultural Semantics and Cognitive Semantics, say a lot about cultural knowledge, values, thoughts, among other aspects that are reflected in that language. The methodology followed in this paper encompasses bibliographic research on indigenous languages and readings on Onomastics and Semantics, as well as ethnographic research with data collection in the Parkatêjê community.
    [Show full text]