Equity in Education Thematic Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Equity in Education Thematic Review EQUITY IN EDUCATION THEMATIC REVIEW NORWAY COUNTRY NOTE Peter Mortimore (Rapporteur) Simon Field Beatriz Pont Review visit: 15-25 November 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Norway Review took place on 15-24 November 2004. The Review Team wishes to express its gratitude to the Steering Group, the author of the Country Analytical Report – Vibeke Opheim of NIFU, the National Coordinator – Hans Gjertsen – and all who, during its visit, provided information or permitted visits to their institutions. We were received with courtesy and consideration throughout the time that we were in Norway. Discussions were open, debates plentiful and opinions generously given. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 The thematic review.............................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 The Norwegian visit and country note .................................................................................................. 9 1.3 General approach................................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Methodology adopted............................................................................................................................ 9 2. BACKGROUND TO THE REVIEW....................................................................................................... 11 2.1 National history................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Demographic conditions ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Economic conditions........................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Political situation................................................................................................................................. 12 2.5 Education service ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.6 Phases of education ............................................................................................................................. 12 2.7 Recent educational reforms................................................................................................................. 14 2.8 Ongoing educational reforms .............................................................................................................. 15 3. HOW MUCH EQUITY CAN BE FOUND IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM?.......................................... 18 3.1 Funding ............................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Selection and access............................................................................................................................ 19 3.3 Concluding comments on selection and access................................................................................... 25 3.4 Transitions........................................................................................................................................... 25 3.5 International comparative measures of literacy, maths and science skills .......................................... 27 3.6 Norwegian standards in reading literacy............................................................................................. 28 3.7 Norwegian standards in mathematics literacy..................................................................................... 30 3.8 Norwegian standards in science literacy ............................................................................................. 31 3.9 Summary of Norwegian pupils’ performance in attainment tests....................................................... 31 3.10 Differences in pupils’ attitudes and behaviour.................................................................................. 32 3.12 Adult learning and literacy skills....................................................................................................... 33 3.13 Conclusion......................................................................................................................................... 36 4. WHAT IS THE CAPACITY WITHIN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY AND RESOLVE PROBLEMS OF INEQUITY? ..................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Current availability of information...................................................................................................... 39 4.2 Current and proposed reforms............................................................................................................. 41 4.3 Schools choice..................................................................................................................................... 44 4.4 The capacity of the Norwegian system to identify and resolve problems of inequity ........................ 45 5. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT ............................ 47 3 5.1 Equity in the education system............................................................................................................ 47 5.2 Overall success in establishing equity................................................................................................. 49 5.3 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................... 57 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................................... 58 ANNEX 1: STATISTICAL APPENDIX ..................................................................................................... 59 ANNEX 2: DIFFERENT TYPES OF TESTING......................................................................................... 77 ANNEX 3: OECD REVIEW TEAM............................................................................................................ 79 ANNEX 4: PROGRAMME OF THE VISIT................................................................................................ 80 ANNEX 5: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR COUNTRY VISIT AND COUNTRY NOTE ...................... 89 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Norway has an expensive education system. The results from international tests show that Norwegian fifteen-year-old pupils perform only at an average OECD level and that there is a bigger than average dispersion of scores despite the high level of equity within the system. Results from international assessments of adults of varying ages, however, show that Norway has one of the best educated working populations in the world. The integration of general and vocational courses within the same institutions and the lack of dead ends within the system together with a smooth transition to working life enable young people to continue learning and increasing their skills. Overall, Norwegian education has both strengths and weaknesses. This Country Note has been prepared as part of the OECD Thematic Review of Equity in Education. The Country Analytical Report was prepared by an independent researcher - Vibeke Opheim of NIFU. The team of examiners included experts from Belgium and UK and two members of the OECD Secretariat. Unfortunately, due to illness the expert from Belgium was unable to fulfil her role. The Review Team met on some sixty occasions over a ten day period in November 2004. It visited six schools or colleges, participated in meetings with officials, head teachers, teachers, parents, pupils and representatives from across the education system. The information gathered has been collated, analysed and debated over a five month period. The full terms of reference were agreed with the Ministry of Education and Research. These focused on two key questions: how equitable is the Norwegian education system and what is its capacity – taking account of recent reform initiatives – to identify and resolve problems of equity. The Norwegian education system is soundly structured and generally highly equitable. In terms of selection, access and transition it compares well with other countries. Norwegian young people at age 15 perform in international tests at the OECD average level but tests in the same year show Norwegian young adults outperforming most of their peers so as to become world leaders in measures of adult literacy. The interpretation of this apparent paradox is not straightforward, but one possibility is that school provision, while apparently unchallenging may avoid the stigma of educational failure and, in the process, develop the motivation to continue learning. Up to now the Norwegian education system has had only a limited capacity to identify and resolve problems of equity. Its philosophical basis places equity at the heart of its endeavour but the lack of systematic information about
Recommended publications
  • Lillehammer Olympic Park
    LILLEHAMMER OLYMPIC PARK Olympic City: Lillehammer Country: Norway Edition of the Games: 1994 Winter Olympic Games Preliminary remarks As you may have seen, two governance cases are dedicated to Lillehammer. Reasons that support this choice are twofold. First, Lillehammer hosted two editions of the Games. If the latter built upon the former to deliver great Games, it also produced its own legacy and consequently, structures to deal with it. Second, as legacy is about both venues and facilities at one side and education, knowledge transfer and experience sharing at the other side, two different cases were necessary to encompass various ways Lillehammer manages its Olympic legacy(ies). Inherited from the 1994 Games, the Lillehammer Olympic Park is a structure run by the municipality of Lillehammer that takes care of the majority of Olympic venues and events. The Lillehammer Olympic Legacy Sports Centre is an emanation of the Norwegian Sports Federation and Olympic and Paralympic Committee and is a direct legacy of the YOG. Obviously, many bridges and crossovers exist between these structures and collaboration and common understanding are key. The big picture also encloses the Norwegian Top Sports Centre of the Innland region dedicated to elite athletes (Olympiatoppen Innlandet), the University, the Olympic Legacy Studies Centre as well as the remaining Olympic venues run by other municipalities or private companies. With all these partners involved in managing Lillehammer’s Olympic legacy, clusters (venues, events, training, research, etc.) facilitate organisation and legacy management. Toolkit: Keeping the Flame Alive – Lillehammer Olympic Park 1 World Union of Olympic Cities 2019 HOW LEGACY GOVERNANCE STARTED IN LILLEHAMMER Since 1990 Lillehammer & Oppland https://www.olympiaparken.no/en/ • • • WHEN WHERE WEB ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… “The XVII Winter Olympics did not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Ressurser for Utvikling Av Bærekraftige Opplevelser I Hedmark Innholdsfortegnelse
    Ressurser for utvikling av bærekraftige opplevelser i Hedmark Innholdsfortegnelse Ressurser for utvikling av bærekraftige opplevelser i Hedmark ........................................................................... 3 Kultur og kulturarv ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Kulturinstitusjonene i fylket .................................................................................................................................. 6 Musikkmiljøet ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Spill, film og digitale medier ................................................................................................................................. 7 Arrangementskompetanse og frivillighet ............................................................................................................. 8 Natur og landbruk ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Kultur- og opplevelsesnæring som tilleggsnæring i landbruket ............................................................................ 9 Samferdsel og transport ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Sykkel og vandring ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Environmental Contaminants Into Lake Mjøsa Action-Oriented Prestudy
    Sources of Environmental Contaminants into Lake Mjøsa Action-oriented prestudy Report: NILU OR 44/2005 TA number: (TA-2144/2005) ISBN: 82-7655-280-3 Ordered by: Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT) Executing agency: Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) Authors: Knut Breivik, Martin Schlabach, Torunn Berg Sources of Environmental Contaminants into Lake Mjøsa Action-oriented prestudy Discharge of Environmental Contaminants into Lake Mjøsa: Action-oriented prestudy Preface The purpose of this action-oriented prestudy has been to gain insight on the sources that control contemporary levels of selected environmental contaminants in Lake Mjøsa. The study was led by the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), with the help of Eirik Fjeld and Gösta Kjellberg of the Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA). We would like to thank the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT) for funding this project, and the Norwegian Research Council for funding supplementary PBDE measurements. We would also like to thank the people who have contributed useful information to the project work. This particularly applies to Eirik Fjeld and Gösta Kjellberg at NIVA, who have been of invaluable help in connection with sample collection during this project and data collection from previous studies. We would also like to thank Elin Lundstad (Norwegian Meteorological Institute) for meteorological data for Kise, employees of the Norwegian Centre for Soil and Environmental Research (Jordforsk) for samples from treatment plants along Lake Mjøsa, and Sverre Solberg (NILU) for trajectory calculations. We would also like to thank the people who have assisted with the sample collection, and the employees who were involved with this work at the Norwegian Crop Research Institute in Kise.
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Airport, Gardermoen - Hamar
    Trollhaugen Tours Itinerary for the Spectacular Mountains, Fjords and Waterfalls of Norway – September 4 – September 17, 2022 Sunday September 4, 2022 - Day 0: Minneapolis airport Group will depart by xxxxx flight xxxxx at x:xxpm – Meet at airport terminal 2 by 4pm. Monday September 5, 2022 - Day 1: Oslo Airport, Gardermoen - Hamar. Group will arrive by xxxxx from xxxxxxxxx before noon. We will board the touring coach and start the transfer to Hamar. Possible stop at Eidsvoll with entry to Eidsvollhuset. Check in at the CC HOTEL ASTORIA in Hamar. Remainder of the day at leisure. Dinner and overnight. (D) Tuesday September 6, 2022 - Day 2: Hamar- Lillehammer Breakfast at the hotel. The Cathedral ruins at Domkirkeodden, Hamar Some sightseeing in Hamar Afternoon transfer towards Lillehammer Possible tour of the Alf Prøysen farm between Hamar and Lillehammer. Possible tour of the veg museet close to Lillehammer Check in at First HOTEL BREISETH in Lillehammer for 2 nights stay Overnight at the hotel (B) Wednesday September 7, 2022 - Day 3: Lillehammer Breakfast at the hotel Visit the open air museum at Maihaugen. Museums guide will make an introduction, self tour of the premises. Entrance fee is included. Afternoon at leisure Overnight at the hotel (B) Thursday September 8, 2022 - Day 4: Lillehammer-Åndalsnes. Breakfast at the hotel. Drive to Åndalsnes Check in at the GRAND HOTEL BELLEVUE Dinner and overnight at the hotel. (B, D) Friday September 9, 2022 - Day 5: Åndalsnes-Fosnavåg. Breakfast at the hotel. Ferry Sulesund to Hareid for bus and passengers Check in at Thon Hotel Fosnavåg Afternoon sightseeing tour on Skreddaren Dinner and Overnight at the hotel (B,D) Trollhaugen Tours Magne & Cindy Hatlevik 6230 10th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedmark Og Oppland: Flere Avganger På Både Gjøvik- Og Dovrebanen
    Oppdatert etter fastsettelse av handlingsprogrammet juli 2018. Jernbanesektorens handlingsprogram: Hedmark og Oppland: Flere avganger på både Gjøvik- og Dovrebanen I jernbanesektorens handlingsprogram fram til 2029 legges det opp til en betydelig styrking av togtilbudet i Innlandet. Stikkord er dobbeltsporutbygging, kryssingsspor og nytt signalanlegg. I tillegg satses det mye på godstrafikken. Jernbanedirektoratet legger opp til at skal gjennomføres et betydelig løft i togtrafikken i Innlandet de kommende årene. Fjerntogtilbudet på Dovrebanen og regiontogtilbudet på Rørosbanen og Raumabanen konkurranseutsettes som del av Trafikkpakke 2. Konkurransegrunnlaget ble gjort tilgjengelig i mars 2018, og trafikkstart er planlagt i juni 2020. Samarbeid Jernbanedirektoratet legger opp til et nært samarbeid med fylker og kommuner, og er i dialog med Hedmark og Oppland fylkeskommuner om billettsamarbeid for lokale reiser Elverum–Hamar– Lillehammer. Dovrebanen På Dovrebanen videreføres intercity-utbyggingen med byggestart på neste delstrekning fra Venjar til Langset i år, og i 2019 legges det opp til byggestart videre nordover. Målet er to tog i timen til Hamar i 2026 og mer enn 15 minutter raskere reisetid, slik at togreisen Hamar–Oslo kommer ned mot én time. Gevinsten i reisetid vil også gjelde for stasjonene nord for Hamar. For å øke ombordkapasiteten på intercity-togene fra Lillehammer skal det bygges et nytt hensettingsanlegg på Hove, som vil gjøre det mulig å kjøre flere avganger med doble togsett. Konkurransegrunnlaget for Trafikkpakke 2 omfatter opsjoner som tilbyderne skal prissette i sine tilbud. Dette inkluderer ny avgang hver vei Oslo–Trondheim mandag til fredag for jevnere frekvens på Dovrebanen. Det er satt i gang en utredning av totimersintervall på fjerntogene Oslo–Trondheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Kartlegging Av Virksomheter Og Næringsområder I Mjøsbyen Mars 2019
    Foto: Magne Vikøren/Moelven Våler Kartlegging av virksomheter og næringsområder i Mjøsbyen Mars 2019 FORORD Rapporten er i hovedsak utarbeidet av Marthe Vaseng Arntsen og Celine Bjørnstad Rud i Statens vegvesen. Paul H. Berger i Mjøsbysekretariatet har vært kontaktperson for oppdraget. Aktørene i prosjektgruppa for Mjøsbysamarbeidet har bidratt med innspill og kvalitetssikring. Data er innhentet og bearbeidet av Ingar Skogli med flere og rekkeviddeanalyser med ATP- modellen er utført av Hilde Sandbo, alle fra Geodataseksjonen i Statens vegvesen Region øst. Mars 2019 2 Innhold 1. Innledning og bakgrunn .................................................................................................... 4 2. Befolkningssammensetning i Mjøsbyen ............................................................................ 4 2.1 Befolkningsutvikling ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Pendlingsforhold og sysselsatte ................................................................................... 8 3 Metode – «Rett virksomhet på rett sted» ........................................................................... 14 3.1 ABC-metoden ............................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Kriteriesett for Mjøsbyen ............................................................................................ 15 3.2.1 Virksomhetene ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Societal Security
    Nordic Societal Security This book compares and contrasts publicly espoused security concepts in the Nordic region, and explores the notion of ‘societal security’. Outside observers often assume that Nordic countries take similar ap- proaches to the security and safety of their citizens. This book challenges that assumption and traces the evolution of societal security, and its broadly equivalent concepts, in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. The no- tion of societal security is deconstructed and analysed in terms of its differ- ent meanings and implications for each country, through both country- and issue-focused studies. Each chapter traces the evolution of key security con- cepts and related practices, allowing for a comparison of similarities and differences between these four countries. Using discourses and practices as evidence, this is the first book to explore how different Nordic nations have conceptualised domestic security over time. The findings will be valuable to scholars from across the geographical and theoretical spectrum, while highlighting how Nordic security discourses and practices may deviate from traditional assumptions about Nordic values. This book will be of much interest to students of security studies, Nordic politics, and International Relations. Sebastian Larsson is a Researcher and Teaching Fellow in International Re- lations at Stockholm University, Sweden. Mark Rhinard is Professor of International Relations at Stockholm Univer- sity and Senior Research Fellow at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs. Routledge New Security Studies J. Peter Burgess, École Normale Superieur (ENS), Paris The aim of this book series is to gather state-of-the-art theoretical reflection and empirical research into a core set of volumes that respond vigorously and dynamically to new challenges to security studies scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Research Information Hub and Nordic Collaboration
    Finnish Research Information Hub and Nordic collaboration Hanna-Mari Puuska, CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland CSC – Finnish research, education and public administration ICT knowledge centre Contents of the presentation 1. Background: Publication data collection in Finland 2. VIRTA Publication Information Service 3. The Finnish Research Information Hub 2020 4. Towards a Nordic research information infrastructure? 2 Background: Publication Data Collection in Finland 3 Background: Publication data collection in Finland • Ministry of Education and Culture has collected bibliographic information on publications annually from • 14 universities and 5 university hospital districts (since 2011) • 23 universities of applied sciences (since 2012) • 12 state research institutes (gradually since 2014) • Each organization has its own CRIS system • Pure, Converis or SoleCRIS • JUSTUS Publication Information Reporting Service for small organizations www.justus.csc.fi • In total, ~50 000 publications per year = books, journal articles, conference papers, non-scholarly publications • The data are publicly available • Statistical data: www.vipunen.fi • Bibliographic data: www.juuli.fi JUULI publication portal (www.juuli.fi) 5 Vipunen statistical portal (www.vipunen.fi) 6 Finnish Publication Forum www.julkaisufoorumi.fi • Used for publication channel rankings as part of universities’ funding model • The ranking is based on journals, series and publishers evaluated by national scholarly panels in • Integrated with other relevant databases (e.g. ISSN,
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Transparency and Registration in Clinical Research In
    Transparency and Registration in Clinical Research in the Nordic Countries By the Nordic Trial Alliance Working Group on Transparency and Registration Transparency and Registration in Clinical Research in the Nordic Countries Nordic Trial Alliance NordForsk Stensberggata 25 NO-0170 Oslo www.nta.nordforsk.org Design: jnd.no Printed by: 07 Group ISSN 1504-8640 ER JØM KE IL T M 2 4 9 1 7 3 Trykksak Transparency and Registration in Clinical Research in the Nordic Countries By the Nordic Trial Alliance Working Group on Transparency and Registration 1 Table of Contents Preface 4 The Nordic Trial Alliance Working Group on Transparency and Registration 6 Conflicts of Interest 7 Abbreviations 8 1. Executive summary 16 2. Background 20 3. Introduction to transparency 30 4. International policies and regulations impacting the future of transparency 36 4.1 The Declaration of Helsinki 36 4.2 The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 36 4.3 The European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) 37 4.4 European Medicines Agency 37 4.5 Horizon 2020 38 4.6 Regulation on clinical trials on medicinal product for human use 39 4.7 EU Regulation for data protection 40 5. Arguments in favour of and against transparency 44 5.1 Arguments in favour 44 5.2 Arguments against 49 6. Does publication of trial protocols or trial results in registers impede journal publications? 54 7. Registries and repositories 58 2 8. Status of the Nordic countries 62 8.1 Current national procedures for public, prospective registration and reporting of clinical
    [Show full text]
  • NORDIC–CHINA COOPERATION to China’S Overall Modernization Objectives
    Andreas Bøje Forsby (ed.) (ed.) Bøje Forsby Andreas Sino–Nordic relations matter For all the Nordic countries, China has become an important trading partner. It also plays a central role in the management of the international order on which the Nordic states are highly dependent. At the same time, the Nordic countries risk being drawn into the unfolding great power struggle between the United States and China. For China, the Nordic region is not a major economic partner nor is it closely affiliated with China’s Belt & Road Initiative. Even so, Nordic expertise, technology and innovation skills are in high demand in China, especially with respect to green growth and sustainable development solutions that are critical NORDIC–CHINA COOPERATION to China’s overall modernization objectives. Against this backdrop of existing interconnectivities and mutual interests, there is a need to take a closer look at Sino–Nordic relations in order to identify the opportunities as well as constraints for advancing the relationship further. This pioneering study investigates the relationship, exploring the range of interconnectivities and collaborative practices between China and its Nordic partners. It maps the scope and recent history of current relations across var­ ious dimensions, not only from an overall comparative perspective but also from the perspectives of the individual countries. The study also focuses on five issue areas – business and innovation, sustain­ able development, research and education, welfare solutions and people­to­ NORDIC–CHINA people relations – where opportunities exist for enhanced cooperation. At the same time, it identifies the main obstacles and challenges to Sino–Nordic relations, including differences of political values and the burgeoning US– COOPERATION China great power rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Nordic Management Practices
    TemaNord 2015:525 TemaNord TemaNord 2015:525 TemaNord Ved Stranden 18 DK-1061 Copenhagen K www.norden.org Good Nordic management practices State of the art Good Nordic management practices The project identified good Nordic management practices by analysing Nordic research on management, working conditions, and productivity. The project identified 2760 publications combining these topics and analysed in detail 38 core publications combining all three topics. The main findings were: 1. Nordic research that combine all three topics is limited in extend but broad in content and therefore fragmented. Values related to cooperation and participation permeated the publications, which sets them apart from EU and US publications. 2. The core publications identified positive relations between management practices, working conditions and workplace performance. 3. Positive management practices are characterised by dialogue and cooperation between managers and subordinates. The research was conducted in 2012-2014 at Aalborg University, SINTEF, VTT, and Karlstad University. TemaNord 2015:525 ISBN 978-92-893-4043-4 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4065-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4064-9 (EPUB) ISSN 0908-6692 TN2015525 omslag.indd 1 23-04-2015 07:37:09 Good Nordic management practices State of the art Hans Yngvar Torvatn, Ole H. Sørensen, Heli Talja and Birgitta Eriksen TemaNord 2015:525 Good Nordic management practices State of the art Hans Yngvar Torvatn, Ole H. Sørensen, Heli Talja and Birgitta Eriksen ISBN 978-92-893-4043-4 (PRINT) ISBN 978-92-893-4065-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-893-4064-9 (EPUB) http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/TN2015-525 TemaNord 2015:525 ISSN 0908-6692 © Nordic Council of Ministers 2015 Layout: Hanne Lebech Cover photo: ImageSelect Print: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk Printed in Denmark This publication has been published with financial support by the Nordic Council of Ministers.
    [Show full text]