Promoting Transit-Oriented Developments by Addressing Barriers Related to Land Use, Zoning, and Value Capture
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report Metropolitan Boston Transportation Commission
SENATE No. 686 Cfre Commontocalti) of egasgacbusettg % REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN BOSTON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Created by Chapter 121 of the Resolves op 1957 January 1958 * BOSTON WRIGHT A POTTER PRINTING CO., LEGISLATIVE PRINTERS 32 DERNE STREET 1968 Cl')t CommoniuealtJ) ot spassacimsetts * RESOLVE OF AUTHORIZATION. [Chapter 121] Resolve providing for an investigati )N AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE CREATION OF A METE DPOLITAN RAPID TRANSIT COMMISSION TO STUDY THE EXTENSION OF RAPID TBANSI' ERVICE THROUGHOUT THE AREA SERVED BY THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHO TY AND RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE BOSTON METROPOLI AN AREA Resolved, That an unpaid special comr ion to consist of two members of the senate to be designated by the president thereof, three members of the house of representatives to be designated by the ipeaker thereof, and two persons to be appointed by the governor, is hereby es stablished for the purpose of making an investigation and study of the subject mai tter of current house document numbered 862, relative to providing for the creationn of a metropolitan rapid transit commis- sion to study the extension of rapid transi?it service throughout the area now served by the metropolitan transit authority: and of the investigation proposed by em- rent house document numbered 1736. ulative to transportation facilities in the Boston metropolitan area. Said commission shallbe provided with quarters in the state house or elsewhere, and may expend for clerical and other services and expenses such sums as may be appropriated therefor. Said commission shall report to the general court the re- sults of its investigation and study, and its recommendations, if any, together with drafts of legislation necessary to carry said recommendations into effect, by filing the same with the clerk of the senate on or before the fourth Wednesday of January in the year nineteen hundred and fifty-eight. -
W:\Data\DOT\Box 2\12245\12245D.Txt
Word Searchable Version not a True Copy National Transportation Library Section 508 and Accessibility Compliance The National Transportation Library (NTL) both links to and collects electronic documents in a variety of formats from a variety of sources. The NTL makes every effort to ensure that the documents it collects are accessible to all persons in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 (29 USC 794d), however, the NTL, as a library and digital repository, collects documents it does not create, and is not responsible for the content or form of documents created by third parties. Since June 21, 2001, all electronic documents developed, procured, maintained or used by the federal government are required to comply with the requirements of Section 508. If you encounter problems when accessing our collection, please let us know by writing to [email protected] or by contacting us at (800) 853- 1351. Telephone assistance is available 9AM to 6:30PM Eastern Time, 5 days a week (except Federal holidays). We will attempt to provide the information you need or, if possible, to help you obtain the information in an alternate format. Additionally, the NTL staff can provide assistance by reading documents, facilitate access to specialists with further technical information, and when requested, submit the documents or parts of documents for further conversion. Document Transcriptions In an effort to preserve and provide access to older documents, the NTL has chosen to selectively transcribe printed documents into electronic format. This has been achieved by making an OCR (optical character recognition) scan of a printed copy. -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
State of CA, Miscellaneous/Home Rule (34)
State of CA, Miscellaneous/Home Rule (34) Mtg Date Subject Vol. Page Minutes 3/15/90 Joint meeting with City of Grass Valley. 49 972 4/10/90 Joint meeting with City of Nevada City. 49 1073 8/7/90 Joint meeting with City of Grass Valley. 50 132 1/27/92 Joint meeting with County of Placer. 51 717A 3/3/92 Res. 92-132 pertaining to the use of Courtroom and Baord Chamber Space 51 833 for all County Central Committees 3/23/92 Joint meeting with Placer County. 51 905 7/7/92 A Letter from Sierra-Sacramento Valley Emergency Medical Services 51 1252 Agency Requesting Opposition to the State Budget Task Force's Recommendation to Eliminate State Emergency Medical Services Authority's Budget. 7/7/92 A Letter from John Zivnuska Requesting Support for Naming a Small 51 1253 Granite Peak in Nevada County "Mount Marliave" in Commemoration of Chester Marliave (1885-1991) and His Two Sons. The Peak Lies About 2 Miles Northwest of Soda Springs. A Request to Support Proposition 155, the $1 Billion Bond Act for Rail 51 1273 Transportation. Discussion of Potential Impacts to Services from the Upcoming Jerry Garcia 51 1273 "Grateful Dead" Concert August 29 in Squaw Valley, Placer County. Request for a Letter of Support from the Board of Supervisors to the Nevada 51 1274 County Arts Council for a $75,000 Grant from the National Endowment of the Arts. Request by Ms. Beckwith for County funding for Sierra Services for the 51 1299 Blind be withheld pending investigation of that organization, including an appropriate needs assessment performed by an impartial agency. -
HIGH-SPEED RAIL 2 Silicon Valley Business Journal August 5, 2016 3
TABLE of EXPERTS A digital supplement to the Silicon Valley Business Journal | August 5, 2016 HIGH-SPEED RAIL 2 SILICON VALLEY BUSINess JOURNAL AUGUST 5, 2016 3 “The exciting thing Silicon Valley’s experts talk about is we’re not talking California’s plan for high-speed rail Introductory Remarks about if, but how hen California voters in 2008 approved Proposition 1A – nearly $10 billion in bonds to From 1995 to 2014, Rod Diridon Sr. was executive director of W construct the first phase of a high-speed rail the Mineta Transportation Institute, a transportation policy to build this.” system for California and improve the rail services that research center created in 1991 by Congress. He is known JEFF MOrales, would connect to it – it was obvious that it would take years as the “father” of modern transit service in Silicon Valley California High-Speed Rail Authority before anyone would ride one of the 200-mph trains from and frequently provides legislative testimony on sustainable the Bay Area to Los Angeles. transportation issues. The region’s main train station was Even after the California High-Speed Rail Authority renamed the “San Jose Diridon Station” upon his retirement announced last February that San Jose would be the Rod Diridon Sr. from public office. Diridon received a B.S. in accounting and northern terminus for the first operating segment, the 2025 Executive Director Emeritus, Mineta MSBA in statistics in 1963 from San Jose State University. service starting date still seemed like the distant future. Transportation Institute But the work to make that opening date a reality is under View Rod Diridon’s full presentation online way now. -
BSRA 2016-03-05 Entertainment Report Copy
BSRA Entertainment Report for March 5, 2016 LONG FORM (for historical record) Entertainment Report for March 5, 2016 March 5, 2016. The T, Then and Now. Henry Marrec made silent color Super 8 mm movies of MBTA operations in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and in the Blizzards of 1978. Now on two DVDs produced in August 2010 with narration that he added himself, he showed this footage, along with footage taken in High Definition Video with sound in 2008 and 2010, and some bonus still photos of the original Red Line cars, and some bonus silent movie footage of New York City elevated operations. Part 1 of the first DVD started in 1967 with narrated Super 8 mm footage featuring MBTA Green PCCs running on the elevated structure from Lechmere through North Station, by Boston Garden. A fair amount of this footage and some of the following segments presented the view looking out the back window, which is something that is no longer possible (barring a rear cab ride or an errant open cab door) ever since the PCCs disappeared except on the Mattapan High-Speed Line. (For that matter, this is no longer possible even on buses ever since the last GM New Look -- or "Fishbowl" -- buses disappeared.) The next footage was Beacon Street outbound to Cleveland Circle. Footage included All-Electrics and Wartime PCCs at Cleveland Circle/ Reservoir in its old configuration. After a brief jaunt on Commonwealth Avenue, the next stop was Watertown Yard, showing several work equipment units that are now long gone, chiefly dump and crane cars, as well as PCCs turning around for revenue service, PCCs were still evident in Watertown Yard through August 1969, and this footage showed some of the last revenue service out of Watertown. -
MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay
The following document was created by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). This document file may not be fully accessible. If you would like to request this file in a different format, please contact the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) via email at [email protected]. CTPS will coordinate your request with the MBTA. SEPTEMBER 2018 MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Transportation Authority MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank PAGE 4 OF 143 MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 MBTA Background ................................................................................................................................. 15 Scope of Transit Asset Management Plan ...................................................................................... 16 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Accountable Executive and Strategic Alignment ........................................................................ 18 Plan -
California--State of Change Program
California State of Change December 3, 2014 Sheraton Grand Hotel Sacramento, CA #PPICfuture Agenda 8:30 a.m. Registration and continental breakfast 9:00 a.m. Welcome Donna Lucas, Lucas Public Affairs 9:15 a.m. Sutton Family Speaker Series Keynote Moderator: Mark Baldassare, PPIC Nancy McFadden, Office of the Governor 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Session 1: California’s New Leadership Presider: Hans Johnson, PPIC Moderator: Gregory Rodriguez, Zócalo Public Square Assemblymember Rocky Chávez, State of California Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez, State of California Assemblymember Chris Holden, State of California 11:30 a.m. Break 11:45 a.m. Session 2 (lunch): Government 2.0 Presider: Patrick Murphy, PPIC Moderator: John Myers, KQED News Controller John Chiang, State of California Mayor Ashley Swearengin, City of Fresno Antonio Villaraigosa, USC Price School of Public Policy 1:15 p.m. Break California—State of Change #PPICfuture 1:30 p.m. Session 3: Economic Shifts Presider: Sarah Bohn, PPIC Moderator: John Diaz, San Francisco Chronicle Antonia Hernández, California Community Foundation Supervisor Joe Simitian, Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Allan Zaremberg, California Chamber of Commerce 2:45 p.m. Break 3:00 p.m. Session 4: Cutting Edges Presider: Ellen Hanak, PPIC Moderator: Patt Morrison, Los Angeles Times and Southern California Public Radio Jeff Morales, California High-Speed Rail Authority Mary Nichols, California Air Resources Board Art Torres, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine 4:15 p.m. Closing remarks and adjourn 4:30 p.m.– Reception 5:30 p.m. California—State of Change #PPICfuture Participants Mark Baldassare is president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California, where he also holds the Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Public Policy and directs the PPIC Statewide Survey―a large-scale public opinion project designed to develop an in-depth profile of the social, economic, and political forces at work in California elections and in shaping the state’s public policies. -
Public Transportation and Public Bike Share Multi-Modal Trips: Public Transportation
CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC BIKE SHARE MULTI-MODAL TRIPS: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Most transit trips – bus and rail – in Cambridge The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority begin or end with a walk or bike ride. Improving (MBTA) is the transit agency serving Cambridge links between biking and transit benefits people and Greater Boston, operating five rapid-transit who use both modes and progresses the City’s lines, commuter rail, commuter ferry, and many bus transportation and sustainability goals in a number routes throughout the region. of ways: The City also works to improve bicycle and transit + Bicycling increases the distance people can integration, such as improving roads for biking, travel to transit stations, so better bicycle providing additional bike parking on public property connections expand the number of people near transit stations, and siting bike share stations in who have access to and from transit—a close proximity to transit stations. solution to the so-called “first and last mile problems.” + Bicycle-on-transit services give people who bike the option to take transit for part of their trip to avoid riding after dark or in areas that are not comfortable to bike. Being able to take a bike on transit can also serve as a contingency plan in the event of poor weather, mechanical issues, or needing to get home quickly in an emergency. 1 + Integrating bicycling and transit supports the Bikes loaded onto MBTA buses. goals of increasing sustainable transportation options, decreasing single-occupancy vehicle use, and reducing negative impacts of climate change emissions, air pollution, and congestion. -
Mystic River Master Plan
Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MYSTIC RIVER MASTER PLAN Arlington | Boston | Everett | Medford | Somerville November 2009 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval Patrick, Governor Timothy Murray, Lieutenant Governor Ian A. Bowles, Secretary, EOEEA Phil Griffiths, Undersecretary, EOEEA Department of Conservation and Recreation Richard K. Sullivan, Commissioner, DCR Jack Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Operations Joe Orfant, Director, Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Dan Driscoll, Project Manager The Consultant Team Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge, LLC: Landscape Architecture and Planning Deneen Crosby, Principal in Charge Carole Schlessinger, Project Manager Carolyn Campbell Ashley Hill Chris Riale Mary Webb Tamar Zimmerman AECOM: Natural Resources Assessment and Environmental Planning Victor Frankenthaler Kimberley Kubera Michael Wierbonics Boelter & Associates, Inc.: Watersheet Planning Alice Boelter i Mystic River Master Plan ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Project Area 2 Project Goals 4 Public Process 4 CHAPTER II: EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 Natural Resources 6 Cultural Resources 19 CHAPTER III: THE PLAN 25 Continuous River Corridor Trail System 28 Overlooks and Views 42 Water Trail 43 Signage and Interpretive Elements 44 Fencing Strategy 45 Property Acquisitions and Easement Needs 46 Encroachment on Public Land 47 Access and Connections 47 Dog Recreation 49 Specific Recommendations by Area 50 Section 1: Harvard Avenue Bridge to Auburn Street Bridge 50 Section 2: Auburn Street Bridge to Craddock -
TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented
TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH TCRP PROGRAM REPORT 102 Transit-Oriented Sponsored by Development in the the Federal United States: Transit Administration Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 2004 (Membership as of January 2004) SELECTION COMMITTEE (as of January 2004) OFFICERS CHAIR Chair: Michael S. Townes, President and CEO, Hampton Roads Transit, Hampton, VA J. BARRY BARKER Vice Chair: Joseph H. Boardman, Commissioner, New York State DOT Transit Authority of River City Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board MEMBERS MEMBERS KAREN ANTION MICHAEL W. BEHRENS, Executive Director, Texas DOT Karen Antion Consulting SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government E. DEAN CARLSON, Director, Carlson Associates, Topeka, KS RONALD L. BARNES JOHN L. CRAIG, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads Central Ohio Transit Authority DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN, President and CEO, FedEx Freight, Memphis, TN LINDA J. BOHLINGER GENEVIEVE GIULIANO, Director, Metrans Transportation Center and Professor, School of Policy, HNTB Corp. Planning, and Development, USC, Los Angeles ANDREW BONDS, JR. BERNARD S. GROSECLOSE, JR., President and CEO, South Carolina State Ports Authority Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. SUSAN HANSON, Landry University Prof. of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University JENNIFER L. DORN JAMES R. HERTWIG, President, Landstar Logistics, Inc., Jacksonville, FL FTA HENRY L. HUNGERBEELER, Director, Missouri DOT NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR. ADIB K. KANAFANI, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Metropolitan Atlanta RTA RONALD F. KIRBY, Director of Transportation Planning, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments CONSTANCE GARBER HERBERT S. LEVINSON, Principal, Herbert S. Levinson Transportation Consultant, New Haven, CT York County Community Action Corp. -
APPENDICES Everett-Boston
Everett-Boston BRT APPENDICES APPENDIX A THE STATE OF TRANSIT IN EVERETT: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FUTURE NEEDS 2 HISTORY OF TRANSIT IN EVERETT Boston’s transit system was originally designed with a series of surface– rapid transit transfer stations. Horsecars and then streetcars wound through narrow downtown streets, but the roads were quickly overcome by congestion, so the city built the first subway in the nation in 1897. However, this subway—now the Green Line—was relatively low-capacity, with a parade of short trolley cars running through narrow passages. As higher- capacity rapid transit lines were built, passengers would board surface vehicles (mostly trolleys) that fed into higher-capacity rapid transit lines at major transfer stations to continue trips downtown. Even as the network has changed, this general function has remained to this day. In the case of Everett, bus routes only serve the bordering towns of Medford, Malden, Revere, and Chelsea; nearly all other destinations require a transfer. For most trips, the transfer point is at Sullivan station, but buses also provide connections to the Orange Line at Wellington and Malden, as well as the Blue Line at Wood Island and Wonderland. This has not always been the case: Before the Orange Line was extended to Oak Grove in the 1970s, the line terminated in Everett, south of Revere Beach Parkway and the main population of the city. When the extension was opened, the routes serving Everett had their termini moved, with some extended from the old Everett station to Sullivan and others rerouted to Malden and Wellington stations.