DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Metropolitan Boston Transportation Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SENATE No. 686 Cfre Commontocalti) of egasgacbusettg % REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN BOSTON TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Created by Chapter 121 of the Resolves op 1957 January 1958 * BOSTON WRIGHT A POTTER PRINTING CO., LEGISLATIVE PRINTERS 32 DERNE STREET 1968 Cl')t CommoniuealtJ) ot spassacimsetts * RESOLVE OF AUTHORIZATION. [Chapter 121] Resolve providing for an investigati )N AND STUDY BY A SPECIAL COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE CREATION OF A METE DPOLITAN RAPID TRANSIT COMMISSION TO STUDY THE EXTENSION OF RAPID TBANSI' ERVICE THROUGHOUT THE AREA SERVED BY THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHO TY AND RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE BOSTON METROPOLI AN AREA Resolved, That an unpaid special comr ion to consist of two members of the senate to be designated by the president thereof, three members of the house of representatives to be designated by the ipeaker thereof, and two persons to be appointed by the governor, is hereby es stablished for the purpose of making an investigation and study of the subject mai tter of current house document numbered 862, relative to providing for the creationn of a metropolitan rapid transit commis- sion to study the extension of rapid transi?it service throughout the area now served by the metropolitan transit authority: and of the investigation proposed by em- rent house document numbered 1736. ulative to transportation facilities in the Boston metropolitan area. Said commission shallbe provided with quarters in the state house or elsewhere, and may expend for clerical and other services and expenses such sums as may be appropriated therefor. Said commission shall report to the general court the re- sults of its investigation and study, and its recommendations, if any, together with drafts of legislation necessary to carry said recommendations into effect, by filing the same with the clerk of the senate on or before the fourth Wednesday of January in the year nineteen hundred and fifty-eight. Approved July 16, 1967 4 SENATE No. 585. [Jan. HOUSE No. 862 By Mr. O’Farrell of Malden, petition of Thomas J. Buckley, George H. O’Farrell and other members of the General Court for the appointment of a metropolitan rapid transit commission to study the extension of rapid transit service in the area served by the Metropolitan Transit Authority. Metropolitan Affairs. C!je CommontueaUf) of spasgac[)U9etfo In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty-Seven. An Act to provide for the cbbation of a metropolitan bap/d transit com- THROTJOH TRANSIT AUTHOP.I 1 Be it enacted by the Senate anda: House of Representatives in General Court a. and by the authority of the same, a. Section 1. There is hereby established a commission to be known as the Metro- politan Rapid Transit Extension Commission, hereinafter referred to as the com- mission, to be composed of the trustee! of the Metropolitan Transit Authority; seven members of the house of representatives, to be designated by the speaker of the house; and five members of the state senate, to be designated by the presi- dent of the senate. Section 2. The Commission is hereby authorized and directed to make studies, preliminary plans and estimates of costs of extensions of rapid transit facilities (a) from the Wonderland station in Revere to a point at or near the Point of Pines section of Revere; ( h) over the Saugus branch of the Boston and Maine Railroad to Everett, Malden, Maplewood and the Linden section of Malden; (c) to Medford, over the Medfordbranch of the Boston and Maine Railroad; (d) to West Everett, Chelsea and Revere, over the existing Boston and Maine Railroad right of way; (e) to Somerville, North Cambridge, Belmont, Arlington, Watertown, over existing rights of way of the Boston and Maine Railroad, or by any other routes deemed economical and feasible by the commission. For the purpose of making surveys and borings in connection with such studies, preliminary plans and estimates of cost, the commission, or its authorized agents, may enterupon private ways Any person injured in his property and use and lands. t by such entry or use of his land by the commission may recover his damage under chapter seventy-nine of the General Laws For the further purposes of this study, the commission shall determine by dis- cussion with the Boston and Maine Railroad whether or not the rights of way involved in this study shallbe taken over exclusively for the use of the Metropolitan Transit Authority, or whether plans shall provide for the joint use of these rights of wav by the Metropolitan Transit Authority and theBoston and Maine Railroad. 1958.] SENATE No. 585. 5 It shall be an essential part of these plans that the Elevated structure through Charlestown to Sullivan square and to Everett station shall be removed, and in order to accomplish these purposes the commission is specifically instructed to study and make recommendation upon either of the following two plans: 1. Construct a Metropolitan Transit Authority station under the North Station; continue the present rapid transit tunnel and the trolley car tunnel beyond Friend and Union street stations of the rapid transit system and the Haymarket square station of the trolley car subway into this new station, and provide beyond the station facilities for the trolley cars to turn and return to the Haymarket station, while the proposed rapid transit tunnel would continue under the Boston and Maine Railroad yard to a point beyond the Charles river, surfacing in the railroad yards and continuing on the railroad right of way to a point at or near the present East Somerville station of the railroad, at which point a Metropolitan Transit Authority station would be erected. Rapid transit trains would then continue over the various Boston and Maine rights of way, thereby providing rapid transit service to Everett, Malden, Maplewood, the Linden section of Malden and Medford, Somerville, North Cambridge, Arlington, Watertown, Belmont, West Everett, Chelsea and Revere. Under this proposal plans shall include the razing of the Elevated structures in Charlestown and the Elevated structures and viaduct to Lechmere square and the elimination of the present Lechmere station. 2. Combine the Metropolitan Transit Authority stations at Friend, Union and Haymarket square, w Tith trolley car service stopping at this new combined station. Rapid transit trains now proceeding by Elevated structure to Sullivan square and Everett would then proceed over the viaduct now being used by trolley cars to reach Lechmere square. Eliminate the present overpass and station at Lechmere Square, and allow the rapid transit trains at that point to come to ground level in the Boston and Maine Railroad yards and continue through the same yards to a Metropolitan Transit Authority station to be erected at or near the location of the present East Somerville station of the Boston and Maine Railroad, and then con- tinuing over railroad right of way, including the Saugus branch of the railroad, to provide rapid transit service to Everett, Malden, Maplewood, the Linden section of Malden and Medford, Somerville, Belmont, Arlington, Watertown, North Cambridge, West Everett, Chelsea and Revere. Under this proposal plans shall include the razing of the Elevated structure from North station to Everett station and the elimination of the Sullivan square and Everett terminals. Under either of these plans, the plans shall provide a large terminal at or near 9Malden square with adequate parking facilities, and arrangements shall include terminal facilities for other street railway buses which now use the Everett station terminal of the Metropolitan Transit Authority, and in estimating the cost of this particular extension, the commission shall include in its plans the cost of depressing the present Saugus branch right of way to below ground level, in order that all gate crossings now existing along that right of way shall be eliminated by overpasses, and the entire right of way shall be enclosed in a continuous chain link fence on both sides of the right of way. 6 SENATE No. 585. [Jan. Section 3. For the purpose of providing funds for, or of restoring to the treasury of the Authority funds expended for, the purpose of this act, the Authority shall from time to time issue, and the Boston metropolitan district, hereinafter referred to as the district, shall purchase, bonds of the Authority to a totalprincipal amount of not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars under and in accordance with sec- tion six of chapter six hundred and forty-nine of the acts of nineteen hundred and forty-nine, as amended. All of the provisions of said section six and of section seven of said chapter six hundred and forty-nine, as now or hereafter amended, shall apply to the issue, refunding and payment of the bonds which the Authority and the district are authorized to issue by this act in the same manner and to the same extent as though the issue of such bonds was specifically authorized by said section six. Section 4. The commission shall file with the clerk of the house of representa- tives, on or before April fifteenth, nineteen hundred and fifty-seven, a report as to the progress made with reference to said studies, preliminary plans and estimates of cost, together with drafts of any necessary legislation. Section 5. This act shall take effect upon its passage. * 7 SENATE No. 585. i HOUSE No. 1736 By Messrs. Moakley of Boston and Hickey of Boston, petition of Edmond J. Donlan and other members of the House for an investigation by a special com- mission (including members of the General Court) of the transportation facilities in the Boston metropolitan area. Transportation. * Cfte CommontoealtJ) of e^assadjusetts In the Year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty-Seven. Resolve providing for an investigation and study by a special commission RELATIVE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE BOSTON METROPOLITAN AREA.
Recommended publications

  • In the Heart of Boston Stunning Waterfront Location

    IN THE HEART OF BOSTON STUNNING WATERFRONT LOCATION OWNED BY CSREFI INDEPENDENCE WHARF BOSTON INC. independence wharf 470 atlantic avenue • Boston, MA Combining a Financial District address with a waterfront location and unparalleled harbor views, Independence Wharf offers tenants statement-making, first-class office space in a landmark property in downtown Boston. The property is institutionally owned by CSREFI INDEPENDENCE WHARF BOSTON INC., a Delaware Corporation, which is wholly owned by the Credit Suisse Real Estate Fund International. Designed to take advantage of its unique location on the historic Fort Point Channel, the building has extremely generous window lines that provide tenants with breathtaking water and sky line views and spaces flooded with natural light. Independence Wharf’s inviting entrance connects to the Harborwalk, a publicly accessible wharf and walkway that provides easy pedestrian access to the harbor and all its attractions and amenities. Amenities abound inside the building as well, including “Best of Class” property management services, on-site conference center and public function space, on-site parking, state-of-the-art technical capabilities, and a top-notch valet service. OM R R C AR URPHY o HE R C N HI IS CI ASNEY el CT ST v LL R TI AL ST CT L De ST ESTO ST THAT CHER AY N N. ST WY Thomas P. O’Neill CA NORTH END CLAR ST BENN K NA ST E Union Wharf L T Federal Building CAUSEW N N WASH ET D ST MA LY P I ST C T NN RG FR O IE T IN T ND ST ST S FL IN PR PO ST T EE IN T RT GT CE ST LAND ST P ON OPER ST ST CO
  • Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

    Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

    y NOTE WONOERLAND 7 THERE HOLDERS Of PREPAID PASSES. ON DECEMBER , 1977 WERE 22,404 2903 THIS AMOUNTS TO AN ESTIMATED (44 ,608 ) PASSENGERS PER DAY, NOT INCLUDED IN TOTALS BELOW REVERE BEACH I OAK 8R0VC 1266 1316 MALOEN CENTER BEACHMONT 2549 1569 SUFFOLK DOWNS 1142 ORIENT< NTS 3450 WELLINGTON 5122 WOOO ISLANC PARK 1071 AIRPORT SULLIVAN SQUARE 1397 6668 I MAVERICK LCOMMUNITY college 5062 LECHMERE| 2049 5645 L.NORTH STATION 22,205 6690 HARVARD HAYMARKET 6925 BOWDOIN , AQUARIUM 5288 1896 I 123 KENDALL GOV CTR 1 8882 CENTRAL™ CHARLES^ STATE 12503 9170 4828 park 2 2 766 i WASHINGTON 24629 BOYLSTON SOUTH STATION UNDER 4 559 (ESSEX 8869 ARLINGTON 5034 10339 "COPLEY BOSTON COLLEGE KENMORE 12102 6102 12933 WATER TOWN BEACON ST. 9225' BROADWAY HIGHLAND AUDITORIUM [PRUDENTIAL BRANCH I5I3C 1868 (DOVER 4169 6063 2976 SYMPHONY NORTHEASTERN 1211 HUNTINGTON AVE. 13000 'NORTHAMPTON 3830 duole . 'STREET (ANDREW 6267 3809 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ricumt inoicati COLUMBIA APFKOIIUATC 4986 ONE WAY TRAFFIC 40KITT10 AT RAPID TRANSIT LINES STATIONS (EGLESTON SAVIN HILL 15 98 AMD AT 3610 SUBWAY ENTRANCES DECEMBER 7,1977 [GREEN 1657 FIELDS CORNER 4032 SHAWMUT 1448 FOREST HILLS ASHMONT NORTH OUINCY I I I 99 8948 3930 WOLLASTON 2761 7935 QUINCY CENTER M b 6433 It ANNUAL REPORT Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/annualreportmass1978mass BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1978 ROBERT R. KILEY Chairman and Chief Executive Officer RICHARD D. BUCK GUIDO R. PERERA, JR. "V CLAIRE R. BARRETT THEODORE C. LANDSMARK NEW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD — 1979 ROBERT L. FOSTER PAUL E. MEANS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 20, 1979 - January 29.
  • Reports of Select Board and Advisory Committee Special

    Reports of Select Board and Advisory Committee Special

    TOWN OF BROOKLINE MASSACHUSETTS REPORTS OF SELECT BOARD AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE on the Articles in the Warrant for the SPECIAL TOWN MEETING to be held in the High School Auditorium Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 7:00 P.M. (Please retain this copy for use at the Town Meeting) Town of Brookline SELECT BOARD Bernard W. Greene, Chair Benjamin J. Franco Nancy S. Heller Heather Hamilton Raul A. Fernandez Melvin A. Kleckner, Town Administrator "The Town of Brookline does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admission to, access to, or operation of its programs, services or activities. Persons with disabilities who need auxiliary aids and services for effective communication in programs, services and activities of the Town of Brookline are invited to make their needs and preferences known to Lloyd Gellineau, Town of Brookline, 11 Pierce Street, Brookline, MA 02445, 730-2328 Voice, 730-2327 TDD, or email at [email protected]." MODERATOR Edward N. Gadsby, Jr. ADVISORY COMMITTEE Michael Sandman, 115 Sewall Ave., No. 4, Chair, Street ................................................. 232-7125 Carla Benka, Vice-Chair, 26 Circuit Road ........................................................................ 277-6102 Benjamin Birnbaum, 15 Feneno Terrace, ......................................................................... 276-5944 Harry Bohrs, 27 Toxeth Street ........................................................................................... 566-3556 Clifford M. Brown, 9 Hyslop Road ..................................................................................
  • Retail/Restaurant Opportunity Dudley Square

    Retail/Restaurant Opportunity Dudley Square

    RETAIL/RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITY 2262 WASHINGTON STREET DUDLEY ROXBURY, MASSACHUSETTS SQUARE CRITICALDates NEIGHBORHOODOverview MONDAY • DECEMBER 9, 2013 Distribution of Request for Proposals (RFP) • Located at the junction of Washington and Warren Streets with convenient access to Interstates 93 and 90 (Massachusetts Bid Counter • 26 Court Street, 10th floor Turnpike) Boston, MA • Dudley Square has a population of approximately 80,000 people and 28,000 households within a one mile radius • Retail demand and spending by neighborhood residents is upwards of $610 million annually TUESDAY • JANUARY 14, 2014 • Approximately $300 million in public/private dollars have been invested in the neighborhood since 2000 Proposer Conference • 2:00 P.M. Central Boston Elder Services Buliding • Dudley Square is within a mile of Boston’s Financial District, blocks away from the South End and is within walking distance to 2315 Washington Street Northeastern University, Roxbury Community College, Boston Medical Center and BU Medical School and in proximity to Mission Hill and WARREN STREET Roxbury, MA Jamaica Plain • Dudley Square Station is located adjacent to the site and provides local bus service that connects Dudley to the MBTA’s Ruggles Station MONDAY • FEBRUARY 10, 2014 Orange Line stop and Silver Line service to Downtown Boston. Dudley Square Station is the region’s busiest bus station and Completed RFP’s due by 2:00 P.M. averages 30,000 passengers daily SEAPORT BOULEVARD BACK BAY SUMMER STREET Bid Counter • 26 Court Street, 10th floor COMMONWEALTH
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS

    Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS

    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
  • Dubai: CREATING the WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 Special

    Dubai: CREATING the WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 Special

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Paris tram network reaches 65km l AnsaldoBreda enters Chinese LRT market l Edinburgh tramway to open early? DUBAI: CREATING THE WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 special Olsztyn Halberstadt Poland’s first How do you new-build sustain a system tramway in with a declining over 50 years population? DECEMBER 2012 No. 900 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 PESA Bydgoszcz SA 85-082 Bydgoszcz, ul. Zygmunta Augusta 11 tel. (+48)52 33 91 104 fax (+48)52 3391 114 www.pesa.pl e-mail: [email protected] Layout_Adpage.indd 1 26/10/2012 16:15 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 448 News 448 DECEMBER 2012 Vol. 75 No. 900 Three new lines take Paris tram network to 65km; www.tramnews.net Mendoza inaugurates light rail services; AnsaldoBreda EDITORIAL signs Chinese technology partnership; München orders Editor: Simon Johnston Siemens new Avenio low-floor tram. Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. 454 Olsztyn: Re-adopting the tram Associate Editor: Tony Streeter Marek Ciesielski reports on the project to build Poland’s E-mail: [email protected] first all-new tramway in over 50 years. Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. 457 15 Minutes with... Gérard Glas 454 E-mail: [email protected] Tata Steel’s CEO tells TAUT how its latest products offer News Editor: John Symons a step-change reduction in long-term maintenance costs.
  • W:\Data\DOT\Box 2\12245\12245D.Txt

    W:\Data\DOT\Box 2\12245\12245D.Txt

    Word Searchable Version not a True Copy National Transportation Library Section 508 and Accessibility Compliance The National Transportation Library (NTL) both links to and collects electronic documents in a variety of formats from a variety of sources. The NTL makes every effort to ensure that the documents it collects are accessible to all persons in accordance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 (29 USC 794d), however, the NTL, as a library and digital repository, collects documents it does not create, and is not responsible for the content or form of documents created by third parties. Since June 21, 2001, all electronic documents developed, procured, maintained or used by the federal government are required to comply with the requirements of Section 508. If you encounter problems when accessing our collection, please let us know by writing to [email protected] or by contacting us at (800) 853- 1351. Telephone assistance is available 9AM to 6:30PM Eastern Time, 5 days a week (except Federal holidays). We will attempt to provide the information you need or, if possible, to help you obtain the information in an alternate format. Additionally, the NTL staff can provide assistance by reading documents, facilitate access to specialists with further technical information, and when requested, submit the documents or parts of documents for further conversion. Document Transcriptions In an effort to preserve and provide access to older documents, the NTL has chosen to selectively transcribe printed documents into electronic format. This has been achieved by making an OCR (optical character recognition) scan of a printed copy.
  • EA Cover Jan 2012 No Cut Lines

    EA Cover Jan 2012 No Cut Lines

    US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Department of Transportation Highway Division and Programmatic Section 4(f) Evaluation Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge Bridge No. B-16-009 = C-01-002 (4FO) January 2012 Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge (cover photo and historic photo below courtesy of Historic New England) 3.14.1 Endangered Species 25 How to Read this Environmental Assessment and Programmatic 3.14.2 Fisheries and Wildlife 25 Section 4(f) Evaluation iii 3.14.3 Vegetation 25 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Project Summary 1 Chapter 4 Alternatives Evaluation 27 1.1 Overview 1 4.1 Introduction 27 1.2 Project History 5 4.1.1 Constraints 27 1.2.1 History of the Bridge 5 4.2 Alternatives 31 1.2.2 History of the Project 5 4.2.1 No Build 31 1.2.3 Longfellow Bridge Inspection and Interim Repairs 5 4.2.2 Bridge Demolition and Replacement 31 1.2.4 Additional Studies Completed 6 4.2.3 Bridge Superstructure Replacement 32 1.2.5 State and Federal Documentation 6 4.2.4 Rehabilitation and Restoration 32 1.2.6 Longfellow Early Action Contract 6 4.2.5 Options for Allocation of User Space 35 1.3 Condition of the Bridge 7 4.3 Options for Addressing Pinch Point Restrictions 42 1.4 The Accelerated Bridge Program 9 4.4 Traffic Summary 47 1.5 Conformance with Transportation Improvement Plans and Land Use 4.5 Maintenance of Services During Construction 48 Plans 9 4.6 Conclusion and Definition of
  • Time Line Map-Final

    Time Line Map-Final

    RAILROAD/TRANSIT HIGHWAY/BICYCLE/AIRPORT LEGISLATIVE Green Line to Medford (GLX), opened 2021 2021 2020 2019 Mass Central Rail Trail Wayside (Wayland, Weston), opened 2019 Silver Line SL3 to Chelsea, opened 2018 2018 Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Phase 2A (Westford, Carlise, Acton), opened 2018 Worcester CR line, Boston Landing Station opened 2017 2017 Eastern Massachusetts Highway/Transit/Bicycle/Airport Timeline Fitchburg CR line (Fitchburg–Wachusett), opened 2016 2016 MassPike tollbooths removed 2016 2015 Cochituate Rail Trail (Natick, Framingham), opened 2015, Upper Charles Rail Trail (Milford, Ashland, Holliston, Hopkinton), opened 2015, Watertown Greenway, opened 2015 Orange Line, Assembly Station opened 2014 2014 Veterans Memorial Trail (Mansfield), opened 2014 2013 Bay Colony Rail Trail (Needham), opened 2013 2012 Boston to Border South (Danvers Rail Trail), opened 2012, Northern Strand Community Trail (Everett, Malden, Revere, Saugus), opened 2012 2011 2010 Boston to Border Rail Trail (Newburyport, Salisbury), opened 2010 Massachusetts Department of TransportationEstablished 2009 Silver Line South Station, opened 2009 2009 Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Phase 1 (Lowell, Chelmsford Westford), opened 2009 2008 Independence Greenway (Peabody), opened 2008, Quequechan R. Bikeway (Fall River), opened 2008 Greenbush CR, reopened 2007 2007 East Boston Greenway, opened 2007 2006 Assabet River Rail Trail (Marlborough, Hudson, Stow, Maynard, Acton), opened 2006 North Station Superstation, opened 2005 2005 Blackstone Bikeway (Worcester, Millbury, Uxbridge, Blackstone, Millville), opened 2005, Depressed I-93 South, opened 2005 Silver Line Waterfront, opened 2004 2004 Elevated Central Artery dismantled, 2004 1 2003 Depressed I-93 North and I-90 Connector, opened 2003, Neponset River Greenway (Boston, Milton), opened 2003 Amesbury Silver Line Washington Street, opened 2002 2002 Leonard P.
  • Ellin Reisner, Ph.D. 51 Mt. Vernon Street Somerville, MA 02145 Reisnere51@Gmail.Com

    Ellin Reisner, Ph.D. 51 Mt. Vernon Street Somerville, MA 02145 [email protected]

    Ellin Reisner, Ph.D. 51 Mt. Vernon Street Somerville, MA 02145 [email protected] July 23, 2010 Secretary Ian Bowles Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs MEPA Office Attn: Holly Johnson, MEPA Analyst EEA #13886 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 RE: EEA #13886 Dear Secretary Bowles, I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Green Line Extension (GLX) FEIR. First, as a strong advocate for the project I want to note that I am appreciative that MassDOT has heard the concerns of the community and agreed to relocate the Maintenance Facility to Option L and has worked to respond to requirements set forth in the certificate that was previously issued. I look forward to continue working with Mass DOT, the MBTA, and fellow members of the Design Working group to ensure that the best decisions are made to move the project forward successfully and on time. There are still a number of important issues that need to be addressed to fully comply with the Certificate and move the project forward successfully, but none that should result in delaying the project any further. My comments will address the following: Ensuring maximum accessibility to stations Integrating design and construction of the Community Path with the GLX Refinement of Option L Maintenance facility Design (incorporating Option L alternative configuration Compliance with public participation requirements set forth in the Certificate and in 301 CMR 11.01 (1) (a). o Mitigation for businesses and residents during construction and when service is operating o Public Involvement from Design through construction Designing GLX to enable future expansion to Porter Square, as well as adding an interim station between Lechmere and Washington St.
  • GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Transit Oriented Development Best Practices February 2007

    GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Transit Oriented Development Best Practices February 2007

    FEBRUARY GREATER CLEVELAND 2007 REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY TOD in Practice San Francisco, CA Dallas, TX Boston, MA Baltimore, MD St.Louis, MO Portland, OR Washington DC Lessons Learned Establishing Roles Developing the Development Using Regional Strengths 1240 West 6th Street Cleveland, OH 44113 216.566-5100 TRANSIT ORIENTED www.gcrta.org DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES 2007 Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority 1240 West 6th Street, Cleveland, OH 44113 216.566.5100 www.gcrta.org Best Practices Manual GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Table of Contents PAGE Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 TOD in Practice .................................................................................................................3 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA): San Francisco Bay Area, CA................................................................................5 Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART): Dallas, TX..............................................................15 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA): Boston, MA................................23 Metro: Baltimore, MD ..................................................................................................32 Metro: St. Louis, MO....................................................................................................36 Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (Tri-Met):
  • Red Sox Foundation R.B.I. 2018 Rules & Scorebook

    Red Sox Foundation R.B.I. 2018 Rules & Scorebook

    RED SOX FOUNDATION R.B.I. 2018 RULES & SCOREBOOK Special thanks to Copy Makers Inc. RED SOX FOUNDATION RBI 2018 RULES RBI OVERVIEW The Red Sox Foundation’s Reviving Baseball in Inner Cities (RBI) is the recreational cornerstone program aimed at inner-city boys and girls. To the Foundation, RBI is more than simply increasing the participation in baseball and softball in the neighborhoods we serve. It’s about coming together as a team, encouraging school attendance and achievement, developing self-esteem and life skills, promoting positive attitudes, instilling values of teamwork, tolerance, and teaching safe and healthy choices to at-risk youth. RBI emphasizes the importance of good decision-making through development of good nutrition, leadership, respect for others, nonviolent conflict resolution, and an overall commitment to one’s potential and to the community. Organized and operated by the official team charity of the Boston Red Sox, the Foundation’s RBI program serves approximately 700 inner-city boys and girls, aged 9-18, in 13 neighborhoods including Allston, Brighton, Dorchester, Hyde Park, Jamaica Plain, Mattapan, Mission Hill, the North and South Ends, Roslindale, Roxbury, South Boston, and West Roxbury. With many neighborhoods plagued by high crime, gang activity, and youth violence, we encourage RBI players to stay in school and resist drugs, alcohol, violence, and other damaging influences in their lives while providing a safe and vital alternative. The Red Sox Foundation is proud to fund the RBI program in its entirety without support from MLB. Our youth are the future and we understand the importance of providing a program that delivers on their needs as well as provides a safe and fun extra-curricular activity.