DOCSLIB.ORG

Name 1 Student Name Jill Fennell English 102 7 April 2015 Annotated Bibliography Adams, Carol J. “Ecofeminism and the Eating O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Name 1 Student Name Jill Fennell English 102 7 April 2015 Annotated Bibliography Adams, Carol J. “Ecofeminism and the Eating O Name 1 Student Name Jill Fennell English 102 7 April 2015 Annotated Bibliography Adams, Carol J. “Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals.” Hypatia 6.1 (1991): 125-145. JSTOR. Web. 26 March 2015. This essay criticizes ecofeminist for not being more inclusive of animals in their practices. This is done by analyzing statements made by feminists about not explicitly including animals. Adams traces the history of ecofeminists back to female vegan communities and address women being natural more sensitive towards nonhuman animals. Adams argues that feminists know what it’s like to be exploited and use their compassion and understanding to identify with animals. Adams also addresses the environmental cost or eating animals, semantics which contrite to the acceptance of eating animals, and the traditions of patriarchy and meat eating. Carol Adams is a well-respected leader of the ecofeminist movement. She uses this essay to confront opposing arguments of the ecofeminist movement. Adams is tying to persuade feminists to also stand up for nonhuman animal rights. This essay is relevant to my project because it provides examples how nonhuman animals are being oppressed and how that relates to the oppression women have suffered. Adams, Carol J. “Why Feminist-Vegan Now?” Feminism & Psychology 20.3 (2010): 302-317. Sage Journals. Web. 26 March 2015. Name 2 This article offers a further reflection on The Sexual Politics of Meat. Adams examines animals and women as an absent referent. This applies to women as women are objectified, and seen as a sex object for men’s consumption and no longer human. Adams goes on to further explain the link of animals being feminized and sexualized, and women being animalized. Adams supports this by using the “Cattle Queen” image of a woman being cut up into meat. She discusses the repercussions the animalization of women has on society. Carol Adams wrote this further explanation of her book “The Sexual Politics of Meat” to examine some of the main topics and how they hold true 20 years from the original publication date. She is a highly respected feminist and animal rights activist. She was a pioneer of the eco- feminist movement and made breaking ground with The Sexual Politics of Meat. In this reflection, Adams is not trying to persuade her audience but provide further explanation to eliminate confusion surrounding her work. This article was written in 2010 and focuses on how her theories can be applied in today’s society, making this work highly relevant to my paper. Calvert, Amy. “You Are What You (M)eat: Explorations of Meat-eating, Masculinity and Masquerade.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 16.1 (2014): 18-33. EBSCO. Web 26 March 2015. The link between mistreatment nonhuman animals and women is explored by the analysis of the television reality series “Man Vs. Food.” Calvert examines the show to find representations of masculine performance and sexualization of women and meat across cultures. This article is concerned with the genderization of food and men’s resistance to the vegetarian/vegan movement led by ecofeminists. Calvert address that meat in particular is seen Name 3 as giving the man dominion and power over the animal. Seeing women as meat gives men power over women and dehumanizes women. Calvert suggests what we eat is directly tied to our identity, and eating meat provides power over others. This article is relevant because it applies ecofeminist topics to modern culture. This proves that’s the issue of women being seen, as meat is not going away. I plan to use this sources to prove that eating meat has been culturally tied to power Calvert proves that this issue exists across cultures and writes to inform the reader than dehumanization of women is currently happening. Amy Calvert is a rising ecofeminist activist and challenges traditional gender roles. Gaarder, Emily. “The Animals Come First.” Women and the animal rights movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011. 117-147. Print. Chapter six focuses on using sexualized images of women to sell animal rights. The chapter mostly references the ads by PETA, which try to promote the animal rights movement by demeaning the feminist movement by objectifying women. Animal rights group such as PETA marginalize women’s rights activists by making women play the role of sex objects. PETA is reinforcing the cycle of oppression and speciesism by ignoring women’s rights. PETA gives a bad name to animal rights, and many feminists are turned off by their ads and are not interested in animal rights. This chapter is relevant to my project because it proves that even animal rights activists are not immune to objectifying women. Mainstream animal rights groups who use a sex sells approach often work against ecofeminist. Gaarder is a ecofeminist and animal rights expert advocating for all species. This chapter was meant to persuade the reader to advocate for Name 4 women’s right as well as animals rights because the cycle of oppression cannot be broken without standing up for all species. Gaard, Greta Claire. “Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 23.3 (2003): 117-146. JSTOR. Web. 26 March 2015. Gaard address the topic of vegetarian ecofeminism, addresses it’s misconceptions and explains why ecofeminism is the third wave of feminism. This wave of feminism puts feminist ideals into practice by standing up for animals and addressing non-human rights. It also connects the oppression of animals to the oppression of women. This essay explores ecofeminists’ motivations, and the path they took to reach their conclusion. It provides insight into the minds ecofeminists by explaining why animals are worth defending. Gaard is an ecofeminist expert whose work is widely cited by scholars in her field. This essay was written in 2003 and provides modern examples relevant to my topic pertaining to unethical treatment of animals. She writes this essay to persuade readers that animals are being abused and that needs to stop in order to have an ethical society. This articles gives insights into the many ways animals are being mistreated. I find this useful because women will be suffering the same fate as animals, if no progress is made to stop animalizing women. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEMINISM, ECOFEMINISM, & VEGETARIANISM Intersections
    Running head: FEMINISM, ECOFEMINISM, & VEGETARIANISM Intersections: Vegetarianism from an Ecofeminist Perspective Anne Proescholdt Luther College FEMINISM, ECOFEMINISM, & VEGETARIANISM 2 When I was about a month into a semester-long college course called “Buddhism, Animals, and Animal Welfare,” I noticed that I was no longer eating meat. After watching and reading about the slaughter of animals for food, I was faced with the reality of what exactly I had been eating for two decades of my life, and I could not stomach it anymore. I was forced to acknowledge that I had been eating individual beings who had eyes like my cats’ but who did not get to live out the same long and happy life. American cultural norms dictate that we are not supposed to think of pet animals as food, but I began to question how and why we make distinctions between certain animal species and how we use them to our “benefit.” Dogs and cats are supposed to love us; cows, pigs, chickens, and turkeys are meant to feed us; primates, rats, and mice are science experiments; rabbit eyes are for chemical testing; horses are for laboring; and the list goes on. When I used to eat meat, I always requested my portion “well-done,” as I did not want to cut or bite into something that would bleed. “That’s not blood,” I was told. “Those are juices.” I decided to accept the euphemism—thinking about it too much would ruin my appetite (which, in hindsight, was a big clue). The myths we tell ourselves in order to assimilate to cultural norms operate to silence dissension, critical thought, questioning of any kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Femminismo E Questione Animale: Bibliografia Orientativa E Strumenti Di Ricerca Nel Web
    Femminismo e questione animale: bibliografia orientativa e strumenti di ricerca nel web a cura di Annalisa Zabonati Sul pensiero ecovegfemminista, che accoglie le istanze dell’ecofemminismo a- nimalista e vegano, c'è ormai una bibliografia vastissima. In questa breve rassegna ci limitiamo ad indicare le opere essenziali per accostarsi all’argomento. Per quanto riguarda la sitografia proponiamo una scelta dei siti web principali con una breve descrizione. Bibliografia Adams Carol J., The Oedible Complex: Feminism and Vegetarianism, in The Lesbian Reader, Covina Gina - Galana Laurel (eds.), Amazon Press, Los Angeles 1975, pp. 145-152. Adams Carol J., The Sexual Politics Of Meat, Continuum, New York 1991. Adams Carol J., The Feminist Traffic in Animals, in Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, Gaard Greta (ed.), Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1993, pp. 195-218. Adams Carol J., Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the defense of animals, Continuum, New York 1994. Adams Carol J., ‘Mad Cow’ Disease and the Animal Industrial Complex: An Ecofeminist Analysis, in “Organization and Environment”, 10, 1997, pp. 26-51. Adams Carol J., Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals: feminism and the de- fence of animals, Black Powder Press, Sacramento 2000. Adams Carol J., Pornography of Meat, Continuum, New York 2004. Adams Carol J.-Donovan Josephine Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, Continuum, New York 1995. Adams Carol J.-Donovan Josephine, Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animal, Continuum, New York 1996. Adams, Carol J.-Tyler Tom, An Animal Manifesto: Gender, Identity, and Ve- gan-Feminism in the Twenty-First Century, in “Parallax 38”, XII, 1, 2006, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Trans-Feminism: Berlin's Transgender Individuals' Narratives As Contributions to Ethics of Vegetarian Eco- Feminism
    ETHICAL TRANS-FEMINISM: BERLIN’S TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS’ NARRATIVES AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO ETHICS OF VEGETARIAN ECO- FEMINISMS By Anja Koletnik Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Assistant Professor Eszter Timár CEU eTD Collection Second Reader: Professor Allaine Cerwonka Budapest, Hungary 2014 Abstract This thesis will explore multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non- consumption and cisgender non-conformity. My argument will present how applying transgender as an analytical category to vegetarian eco-feminisms, can be contributive in expanding ethical and political solidarity within feminist projects, which apply gender identity politics to their conceptualizations and argumentations. I will outline the potential to transcend usages of gender identity politics upon a cisnormative canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms lead by Carol J. Adams’ The Sexual Politics of Meat (1990). Adams’s canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms appropriates diet as a central resource of their political projects, which contest speciesism and cis-sexism. Like Adams’ canon, my analysis will consider diet as always having political connotations and implications, both for individuals and their embodiments, within broader socio-political realms. Alongside diet, transgender as an analytical category will be employed within analysis, due to its potential of exposing how genders as social categories and constructs are re-formed. My analysis will be based on narrative interviews, which will explore the multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non-consumption and cisgender non-conformity among members of Berlin’s transgender / cisgender non-conforming and meat non-consuming subcultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Freaks, Elitists, Fanatics, and Haters in Us
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ ANIMAL PEOPLE: FREAKS, ELITISTS, FANATICS, AND HATERS IN U.S. DISCOURSES ABOUT VEGANISM (1995-2019) A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in LITERATURE by Samantha Skinazi June 2019 The Dissertation of Samantha Skinazi is approved: ________________________________ Professor Sean Keilen, Chair ________________________________ Professor Carla Freccero ________________________________ Professor Wlad Godzich ______________________________ Lori Kletzer Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Samantha Skinazi 2019 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES IV ABSTRACT V DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT VII INTRODUCTION: LOVING SPECIES 1 NOTES 21 FREAKS 22 RIDICULE: THAT JOKE ISN'T FUNNY ANYMORE 28 EMPATHY AND SHAME: OMNIVORE DILEMMAS IN THE VEGAN UTOPIA 41 TERRORS: HOW DO YOU KNOW IF SOMEONE'S VEGAN? 64 CONCLUSION: FROM TEARS TO TERRORISM 76 LIST OF FIGURES 79 NOTES 80 ELITISTS 88 LIFESTYLE VEGANISM: GOOP AND THE WHITE WELLNESS VEGAN BRAND 100 BLINDSPOTTING VEGANISM: RACE, GENTRIFICATION, AND GREEN JUICE 112 DEMOCRATIC VEGANISM: OF BURGERS AND PRESIDENTS 131 CONCLUSION: THE SPECTER OF NATIONAL MANDATORY VEGANISM 153 NOTES 156 FANATICS 162 WHY GIVE UP MEAT IN THE FIRST PLACE? 170 MUST IT BE ALL THE TIME? 184 WHY TELL OTHERS HOW TO LIVE? 198 CONCLUSION: MAY ALL BEINGS BE FREE FROM SUFFERING? 210 NOTES 223 CONCLUSION: HATERS 233 NOTES 239 REFERENCES 240 iii List of Figures Figure 1.1: Save a cow eat a vegetarian, bumper sticker 79 Figure 1.2: When you see a vegan choking on something, meme 79 Figure 1.3: Fun prank to play on a passed out vegan, meme 79 Figure 1.4: How do you know if someone's vegan? 79 Don't worry they'll fucking tell you, meme iv Abstract Samantha Skinazi Animal People: Freaks, Elitists, Fanatics, and Haters in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecofemminismo E Questione Animale: Una Introduzione E Una Rassegna
    Ecofemminismo e questione animale: una introduzione e una rassegna a cura di Annalisa Zabonati La “questione animale” ha accompagnato la riflessione femminista fin dai suoi esordi. Le appassionate campagne antivivisezioniste di Anna B. Kingsford, Frances Power Cobbe, Lizzy Lind af Hageby nell’Inghilterra vittoriana, hanno infiammato – attraverso opuscoli, volantini, immagini proiettate dalle lanterne magiche – ampi strati dell’opinione pubblica. A queste autrici, poco note o dimenticate, sarà dedicata una piccola antologia in uno dei prossimi numeri della rivista. In questa introduzione mi limito a tracciarne brevemente i profili. Anna B. Kingsford si laureò in medicina nel 1880, rifiutandosi di praticare la vivisezione, con una tesi sull’alimentazione vegetariana e per tutta la vita si dedicò alla denuncia dello sfruttamento degli animali. Instancabile antivivisezionista, convinta suffragista, affermò: “Flesh-eating and vivisection are in principle closely related, and both are defended by their advocates on common premises, of which the catch-cries are Utility and the Law of Nature”1. Frances Power Cobbe, scrittrice e riformatrice sociale di origine irlandese, femminista e lesbica, fondò nel 1875 la National Anti-Vivisection Society, e nel 1898 la British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, entrambe tutt’ora attive. In uno dei suoi numerosi pamphlet contro la vivisezione, scrisse: The vindication of the rights of the weak, it is not too much, I think, to insist that the practice of vivisection, in which this tyranny of strength culminates, is a retrograde step in the progress of our race; a backwater in the onward flowing stream of justice and mercy, no less portentous than deplorable2. Lizzy Lind af Hageby, femminista e animalista di origine svedese, cofondatrice dell’Animal Defense and Anti-Vivisection Society, si infiltrò durante le lezioni di 1 A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Problematisations in the Live Export Policy Debates
    ANIMAL CRUELTY, DISCOURSE, AND POWER: A STUDY OF PROBLEMATISATIONS IN THE LIVE EXPORT POLICY DEBATES Brodie Lee Evans Bachelor of Arts (Politics, Economy, and Society; Literary Studies) Bachelor of Justice (First Class Honours) Graduate Certificate in Business (Accounting) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Queensland University of Technology 2018 School of Justice | Faculty of Law This page intentionally left blank Statement of Originality Under the Copyright Act 1968, this thesis must be used only under the normal conditions of scholarly fair dealing. In particular, no results or conclusions should be extracted from it, nor should it be copied or closely paraphrased in whole or in part without the written consent of the author. Proper written acknowledgement should be made for any assistance obtained from this thesis. The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made. Brodie Evans QUT Verified Signature ……………………………………………………………………….. Signature October 2018 ……………………………………………………………………….. Date i Dedication For Scottie. ii Abstract Since the release of video footage exposing the treatment of animals in the live export industry in 2011, ‘animal cruelty’ has increasingly been a major concern in mainstream Australian discourse. Critiques over the inadequacy of current legal protections afforded to animals have had a significant impact on how we debate animal welfare issues and the solutions to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Veganism As Affirmative Biopolitics: Moving Towards a Posthumanist Ethics?
    Veganism as Affirmative Biopolitics: Moving Towards A Posthumanist Ethics? Eva Giraud Animal studies, as an academic field, emerged from a conceptual and political demand to re-evaluate (and potentially contest) existing human-animal relations, by creating new ethical frameworks that do not automatically privilege the human.1 Recent theoretical trends in the field, however, have led to criticisms that it has betrayed this original aim. The most pointed criticism is that the field’s engagement with posthumanist concepts, which ostensibly de-centre the human and dislodge the epistemological structures of humanist thought, have (paradoxically) resulted in the emergence of a new, subtle form of anthropocentrism that is difficult to challenge.2 Thinkers from Critical Animal Studies (CAS), for instance, have suggested that influential theorists, such as Donna Haraway, have led to the depoliticization of animal studies by leaving cultural practices that treat animals as “legitimately” exploitable intact (including meat consumption and animal breeding), while displacing the conceptual frameworks that have conventionally been used to contest these practices (namely animal rights discourses).3 The problem is that critical arguments such as this tend to be by-passed without full consideration. Thinkers from the wider field of animal studies, for instance, have argued that CAS perspectives are grounded in totalising rights discourses, which derive from a humanist lineage and are thus intrinsically anthropocentric, undercutting their intended purpose.4 In sum, these debates have resulted in tensions between “mainstream” and critical animal studies, which hinge on questions of rights. PhaenEx 8, no. 2 (fall/winter 2013): 47-79 © 2013 Eva Giraud - 48 - PhaenEx On the one hand, “mainstream” animal studies have increasingly taken up theoretical frameworks from posthumanist thought; they argue that appeals to animal rights are self- defeating because they reinforce ethical frameworks that privilege the human.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegan Values, Religious Rights: a Cultural Critique of Entrenched Ethics
    Cara Hunt - Presentation for Lewis & Clark Animal Law Conference – October 2010 Page 1 of 36 Vegan Values, Religious Rights: A Cultural Critique of Entrenched Ethics “Non-injury to living beings is the highest religion.” 1 —Jain Maxim INTRODUCTION People adopt vegetarian diets for numerous reasons, including but not limited to, environmental protection, animal welfare, aesthetics, health, and religion; however, when someone chooses to become vegan, thereby avoiding all use of animal products, ethical justifications often become paramount.2 Despite being rooted in morality and ethics, veganism is not commonly considered a religion, and therefore receives no protection under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.3 Without constitutional protection, vegans may be at risk from practicing their veganism. For example, they may be denied employment for refusing to receive vaccinations that have been cultured in nonhuman animal cells.4 Additionally, vegan 1 Sri Swami Sivananda, Jainism, online: The Divine Life Society http://www.dlshq.org/religions/jainism.htm at para. 25. 2 See generally Erik Marcus, Meat Market: Animals, Ethics, & Money (Boston: Brio Press, 2005); Sarah Soifer, “Vegan Discrimination: An Emerging and Difficult Dilemma” (2003) 36 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1709; Karen Iacobbo & Michael Iacobbo, Vegetarians and Vegans in America Today (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2006); Greta Gaard, “Vegetarian Ecofeminism” (2002) 23:3 Frontiers 117. Many people describe their journey to veganism as a continuum beginning with vegetarianism and resulting in veganism. See, for example, Jeffrey M. Freedman, “Why I Am Vegan” Religion for Vegetarians and Vegans, online: Vegetarian/Vegan Society of Queensland http://www.vegsoc.org.au/religion_whyiamvegan.asp.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMAN's STRUGGLE AGAINST OPPRESSIONS AS VIEWED by TRANSFORMATIVE ECOFEMINISM in HAN KANG's the VEGETARIAN THESIS By: Izzul M
    WOMAN’S STRUGGLE AGAINST OPPRESSIONS AS VIEWED BY TRANSFORMATIVE ECOFEMINISM IN HAN KANG’S THE VEGETARIAN THESIS By: Izzul Millati Umami NIM 14320049 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2018 WOMAN’S STRUGGLE AGAINST OPPRESSIONS AS VIEWED BY TRANSFORMATIVE ECOFEMINISM IN HAN KANG’S THE VEGETARIAN THESIS Presented to Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra (S.S) By: Izzul Millati Umami 14320049 Advisor: Dr. Mundi Rahayu, M. Hum NIP. 196802262006042001 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG 2018 i ii iii iv MOTTO Life is sharing and caring v DEDICATION Millions and billions thanks towards my mother and my father, Siti Munawaroh and Sapari the greatest parent in the world, my two brothers, Hamami Nasirudin and Kholidul Azhari who have brought me up till I can run my campus life. ‘BSI Heroes 2014’,’Kowah-Kowoh Kreatif’, M2Pro Squad, and KKM 220 Squad who will always be my second family. Thanks for being my mental survivor, mood booster, and anything I cannot say. ‘Ikatan Alumni Al-Kamal Blitar’ as the place for me to remember with my origin ‘Pesantren Putri al-Hikmah Al-Fatimiyyah’ as my place to learn diversity and upgrade myself. A Million thanks to my supervisor, Mrs. Mundi Rahayu as the second mother who guide us till I can finish this task. And also billion thanks to those who always beside me, you all are the rainbow that colour my bore life.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Periodicals
    The Un vers ty of W scons n System Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents WOMEN'S STUDIES Volume 22, Number 3, Fall 2002 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard LIBRARIAN Women's Studies Librarian Feminist Periodicals A current listing of contents Volume 22, Number 3 Fall 2002 Periodical literature is the culling edge of women's scholarship, feminist theory, and much of women's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing pUblic awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table of contents pages from current issues of major feminist journals are reproduced in each issue of Feminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As pUblication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. subscription price(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking and Acting Feminist - Animal Rights Discourse Online
    for(e)dialogue Volume 3, Issue 1 (2019): Media and Gender An Interspecies Internet? Thinking and Acting Feminist - Animal Rights Discourse Online Rebecca Jones Abstract: As contemporary feminist discourse continues to utilize online and digital media and technologies as platforms and tools for debate and information sharing, the reality of who - a n d what - has access and makes contributions to this discourse is changing. The perception of online and digital communication and debate as accessible, intersectional and democratizing forces has also meant that the conceived relationship between theoretical discourse and feminist praxis in a global forum has been made more mutable, and the distinctions between what is theory and what is praxis have become more blurred. Whether we regard digital media as trans or post-human, disembodied or decentralized, it does at least represent a form of conversation that blurs the boundaries of how we communicate, who (and what) is considered to have subjectivity, the impact of geographical location and embodiment and corporeality. These have also underpinned feminist animal rights and feminist vegetarian/vegan discourse, especially around our feminist understanding of what it means to be human. This paper references feminist- vegetarian, feminist-vegan and ecofeminist theory alongside theoretical work from animal studies across a range of disciplines to analyze feminist intersections with animal rights and veganism. In doing this I hope to offer an introduction to how online context influences feminist animal rights discourse. By considering this topic through a lens of ecofeminist and vegetarian/vegan feminist theory, what we think about when we think about ‘the animal’, and an examination of the role and function of digital media in feminist discourse, this paper offers some reflections on the online contribution being made to feminist animal rights and vegan discourse, and how digital media are shaping and influencing this discourse and its wider impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Una Biopolítica Feminista De La Carne: La Gestación Subro- Gada Como Ejemplo De Los Vínculos De Opresión Entre Las Mujeres Y Los Animales No Humanos
    ISABEL BALZA MÚGICA1 Una biopolítica feminista de la carne: la gestación subro- gada como ejemplo de los vínculos de opresión entre las mujeres y los animales no humanos A Feminist Biopolitics of Flesh: Surrogate Pregnancy as an Example of the Links between the Oppression of Women and Nonhuman Animals RESUMEN Desde diversos paradigmas teóricos, el feminismo examina las distintas discriminacio- nes entrelazadas (sexismo, racismo, clasismo, capacitismo, homofobia o especismo). Entre éstas, voy a fijarme en este artículo en los vínculos teóricos y prácticos entre la dominación de las mujeres y la de los animales no humanos. Para ello propongo una distinción biopolí- tica, cuerpo/carne, frente a las oposiciones zoé/bíos (Agamben) o persona/no persona (Esposito). A partir de aquí articularé el esquema de lo que llamaré una biopolítica feminista de la carne para, por una parte, analizar la categoría de carne en su aspecto más negativo y cosificador, examinando la gestación subrogada como ejemplo de una biopolítica de la carne que mues- tra las semejanzas entre la opresión de las mujeres y la de los animales no humanos. Por otra parte, y a modo de conclusión, plantearé un sentido positivo del concepto de encarnación. Palabras clave: biopolítica feminista, carne, cuerpo, ética animal, gestación subrogada. ABSTRACT From different theoretical paradigms, feminism examines the different interconnected discriminations (sexism, racism, classism, capacitism, homophobia or speciesism). Among these, in this paper I will focus on the theoretical and practical links between the domination of women and that of nonhuman animals. For this I propose a biopolitical distinction, body/ flesh, in opposition to zoé/bíos (Agamben) or person/non-person (Esposito) distinctions.
    [Show full text]