A Study of Problematisations in the Live Export Policy Debates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ANIMAL CRUELTY, DISCOURSE, AND POWER: A STUDY OF PROBLEMATISATIONS IN THE LIVE EXPORT POLICY DEBATES Brodie Lee Evans Bachelor of Arts (Politics, Economy, and Society; Literary Studies) Bachelor of Justice (First Class Honours) Graduate Certificate in Business (Accounting) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Queensland University of Technology 2018 School of Justice | Faculty of Law This page intentionally left blank Statement of Originality Under the Copyright Act 1968, this thesis must be used only under the normal conditions of scholarly fair dealing. In particular, no results or conclusions should be extracted from it, nor should it be copied or closely paraphrased in whole or in part without the written consent of the author. Proper written acknowledgement should be made for any assistance obtained from this thesis. The work contained in this thesis has not been previously submitted to meet requirements for an award at this or any other higher education institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made. Brodie Evans QUT Verified Signature ……………………………………………………………………….. Signature October 2018 ……………………………………………………………………….. Date i Dedication For Scottie. ii Abstract Since the release of video footage exposing the treatment of animals in the live export industry in 2011, ‘animal cruelty’ has increasingly been a major concern in mainstream Australian discourse. Critiques over the inadequacy of current legal protections afforded to animals have had a significant impact on how we debate animal welfare issues and the solutions to them. The dominant view of ‘animal cruelty’, as expressed in philosophy, ethics, and green criminology research, adopts an oppressor-victim narrative that suggests animals are victims of human oppression due to a ‘speciesist’ ideology fundamental to the treatment of animals in society. While ‘speciesism’ as a theoretical concept has been beneficial in providing insight into the human- animal power dynamic, methodologically it can be a blunt tool providing a blanket explanation for ‘animal cruelty’ that actually prevents a recognition and analysis of the complexities underpinning its governance in policy debates. An emerging body of literature on ethical issues in food systems positions particular groups of humans as ‘victims’ in capitalist food systems due to issues of class, race, gender, religion and culture. This expansion of who is understood to be a ‘victim’ in discussions about the ethics of food raises questions about how human-human power dynamics influence animal cruelty policy debates, and complicate attempts to achieve animal protectionist goals of reducing or eliminating animal use. iii This thesis offers a qualitative discourse analysis of public debates surrounding animal cruelty policy, specifically in the live export trade following the 2011 Four Corners documentary titled, “A Bloody Business”. Using Foucault’s work on discourse, power, and knowledge, this thesis argues that the problematisation of human-centred issues in the live export debate influenced how ‘animal cruelty’ as a discursive object was conceptualised, discussed, and governed. It challenges the common paths of animal activism that often take on the assumption that the way we talk about animal cruelty is because of a belief system of seeing animals subordinate to humans, and therefore requires an awakening or resistance to that indoctrination. Instead of solely focusing on the human-animal dynamic, this thesis refocuses the discussion towards human-centred issues to offer new paths of resistance. It expands understandings of ‘oppressor’ and ‘victim’ in these policy debates and provides an understanding of how human-human power relations shape how ‘animal cruelty’ is problematised and responded to. Human-human power relations are circulating within these debates and extending the targets of intervention and possibilities for action. This suggests there is potential to engage with human-centred problematisations more productively to achieve change for animals. iv Key Words Activism; animal agriculture; animal cruelty; animal rights; animal welfare; discourse; ethics; food security; knowledge; live export; Michel Foucault; morality; oppression; power; problematisation; speciesism; subjects; victim. v Acknowledgements I acknowledge the Indigenous owners of the land where Queensland University of Technology (QUT) now stands, where this work was produced. I wish to pay respect to their Elders – past, present and emerging – and acknowledge the important role Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to play within the QUT community. I also wish to acknowledge the important role Indigenous peoples play in Australian rural communities, and hope that Indigenous voices become centred in future policy decisions in Australia. I would like to acknowledge support offered by my supervisory team, both past and present, throughout my candidature. Even if we disagreed at times on the topic of animal cruelty, or the best ways to respond to it, your continual encouragement to follow my passion made this project possible. To my principal supervisor, Associate Professor Matthew Ball, thank you for bringing so much expertise to my research. Your influence is clear throughout the pages of this thesis. Thank you for encouraging me to become part of the Foucauldian Cult. I wonder what would have happened if you had never come to my Confirmation and asked “Why are you not using Foucault?” Thank you to my associate supervisor, Dr Erin O’Brien, for your support and guidance. We survived the ups and downs of an honours thesis and a PhD thesis together. I am so indebted for your confidence in me that sustained my drive throughout my candidature. Thank you to my associate supervisor, Professor Belinda vi Carpenter, for providing invaluable advice and pushing me to produce better work. To my former supervisor, Professor Reece Walters, from that initial first meeting, your encouragement to research crimes against animals and to tip my toes into the green criminology pond gave me the much needed confidence to embark on this journey. Additionally, I would like to thank Associate Professor Barbara Adkins and Dr Carol Richards for your contributions to my confirmation and final seminar respectively, which helped shape my thesis for completion. For the informal mentoring and friendship, especially in the early stages of my candidature, thank you my fellow law and justice post-graduate students and the C Block Writers Group. Special mention to Dr Amy Gurd, as the PhD struggle was lessened by getting to share this experience with you and knowing it was all possible. To the research support and administration staff at QUT, thank you for the crucial practical support throughout my candidature. I also want to thank and express my love and appreciation to my family, in particular my partner Jared Evans. I could not have survived this journey without your support and patience. Your continual words of encouragement when I felt like giving up or feeling pessimistic about ever getting to witness change in this world for the better, kept me going. I am so thankful to you, for being the best human with whom I share my life. Brodie Evans October, 2018 vii Table of Contents Statement of Originality……………............................................................................ i Dedication......................................................................................................................ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................iii Key Words .....................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................vi Table of Contents.....................................................................................................viii CHAPTER ONE: Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 1.2 RESEARCH CONTEXT .......................................................................... 2 1.3 CASE STUDY: AUSTRALIAN LIVE EXPORT DEBATE ................... 6 1.4 RESEARCH APPROACH ..................................................................... 11 1.4.1 Aims and objectives ................................................................................................ 11 1.4.2 A study of problematisations ................................................................................. 13 1.4.3 Research questions ................................................................................................. 14 1.4.4 Selection of material................................................................................................ 15 1.5 THESIS AND ARGUMENT STRUCTURE ......................................... 17 1.6 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER TWO: ‘Animal cruelty’ as an object of research .......................... 22 2.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 22 2.2 THE PROBLEM OF ANIMAL CRUELTY .........................................