DOCSLIB.ORG

Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, Published by Sydney University Press

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, Published by Sydney University Press This document is an extract from Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, published by Sydney University Press. ISBN: 9781743324738 (paperback) 9781743324745 (ebook: epub) 9781743325025 (ebook: PDF) All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA [email protected] sydney.edu.au/sup Parts of this work are available on the University of Sydney eScholarship Repository at hdl.handle.net/2123/15349. Please cite the full work as: Chen, Peter John (2016). Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press. The book may be purchased from Sydney University Press at the following link: http://purl.library.usyd.edu.au/sup/animalwelfareinaus. Animal welfare in Australia ANIMAL PUBLICS Melissa Boyde & Fiona Probyn-Rapsey, Series Editors Other titles in the series: Animal death Ed. Jay Johnston & Fiona Probyn-Rapsey Animals in the Anthropocene: critical perspectives on non-human futures Ed. The Human Animal Research Network Editorial Collective Cane toads: a tale of sugar, politics and flawed science Nigel Turvey Engaging with animals: interpretations of a shared existence Ed. Georgette Leah Burns & Mandy Paterson Fighting nature: travelling menageries, animal acts and war shows Peta Tait Animal welfare in Australia Policy and politics Peter John Chen First published by Sydney University Press © Peter John Chen 2016 © Sydney University Press 2016 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 The University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] sydney.edu.au/sup National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Creator: Chen, Peter J. (Peter John), 1972– author. Title: Animal welfare in Australia : politics and policy / Peter John Chen. ISBN: 9781743324738 (paperback) 9781743324745 (ebook: epub) 9781743324752 (ebook: Kindle) 9781743325025 (ebook: PDF) Series Animal Publics. Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Animal welfare—Government policy—Australia. Animal welfare—Political aspects—Australia. Animal welfare—Moral and ethical aspects—Australia. Human–animal relationships—Australia. Australia—Politics and government. Dewey Number: 636.0832 Cover image: Hand feeding sheep in feedlot at Connemara Station, Tarcutta, New South Wales. Photographer: Carl Davies. CSIRO Science Image, http://scienceimage.csiro.au. Used under CC Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0). Cover design by Miguel Yamin Contents Acknowledgements xi List of figures ix List of acronyms xiii Nomenclature xv Introduction xvii Part 1 1 1 History 3 2 Ethics 21 Part 2 37 3 Attitudes to animals 39 4 In the media 85 5 Mapping the policy domain 123 Part 3 149 6 Animal protectionism 151 vii Animal welfare in Australia 7 Animal-using industry 223 8 Political and administrative policy elites 275 Conclusion 319 Appendices Appendix A: Research methods 323 Appendix B: Major ethical positions regarding animals 326 Appendix C: Australian animal protection organisations – a 330 sample Appendix D: Animal-using industry in Australia – 334 representative bodies and their relationships with policy-makers Appendix E: Timeline of animal welfare policy in Australia 338 Appendix F: Significant legal instruments 350 Appendix G: Top Google queries relating to the 10 most 360 frequently searched-for animals Reference list 365 Index 401 viii Introduction The direct inspiration for this book was the temporary cessation of live animal exports to Indonesia in late 2011. This decision of the Gillard Labor government directly followed the broadcast of footage of slaugh- terhouse practices in Jakarta. In response to this footage, the websites of activist organisations crashed due to dramatic surges in traffic (AAP 2011a), and members of Parliament reported being deluged with calls about the show. Popular concern led some government backbenchers to advocate that the live-export industry be phased out, while competing legislative proposals emerged from the Australian Greens and inde- pendent senators to ban or restrict the practice. In the following two years, successive reports of animal mistreatment in Egypt and Pakistan sparked further unrest (Rout and Crowe 2012). A few years before these live-export scandals, PETA (USA) had led an influential campaign against the practice of mulesing in Australia, focusing particularly on the lack of pain relief during this invasive pro- cedure. In response, in 2004 the wool industry had agreed to invest in research that would allow mulesing to be voluntarily phased out (mulesing is defined by the Primary Industries Council as the surgi- cal removal of well-bearing skin from the tail and breech area of a sheep, and is performed to prevent insect infestation; Primary Indus- tries Ministerial Council 2006, 17). Between these two controversies, xvii Animal welfare in Australia by 2014 it appeared that a significant shift in the political balance over animal welfare standards had emerged in Australia. Since then, however, it is possible to see a shoring up of the pre- existing status quo towards policy regarding the treatment of animals. The government’s decision to temporarily halt live export negatively affected the operations of exporters and tested Australian–Indonesian relations, with wider implications for co-operation between the two nations that spilled over into debates about border protection and asylum seekers. However, exports resumed in 2013 and the live-export sector has since benefited from free-trade negotiations that look set to grow this agricultural subsector in Australia dramatically. In the same period, key members of the sheep industry abandoned their commit- ment to PETA to phase out mulesing in favour of a longer-term strategy of research and breeding (Jepson 2012). And although animal welfare activists have enjoyed other victories, such as a 2014 ban on the use of cages for chickens and pigs in intensive production in the Australian Capital Territory, this occurred only after the last of these industries had been paid by the ACT government to leave the jurisdiction. The policy landscape may shift, but one thing is constant: Aus- tralians’ attitudes to animals are complex and contradictory. In 2013 Australians directly consumed hundreds of millions of animals as meat while lavishing money and affection on their companion animals, 25 million of whom reside in 5 million (or 66 per cent of) Australian households (Animal Health Alliance 2013). Australians spend $8 billion annually on this subclass of favoured animals – four times the total amount individuals gave to charitable causes (McGregor-Lowndes and Pelling 2013). Another case that unfolded during the writing of this book captures this complexity. In 2014, following a slight rise in the small number of shark attacks (AAP 2014), the Western Australian govern- ment implemented a program of shark culling. In response, the public rallied to the largest pro-shark protests in Australian (and possibly international) history (ABC 2014). That sharks, the focus of a common, visceral phobia that is often seen as being hardwired and is far beyond a rational estimate of the actual risk of attack (Ritter et al. 2008, 47), mobilised so many, shows how complex our political relationship with animals can be. Millions of domesticated animals go to their deaths xviii Introduction annually in Australia largely unremarked, yet a small number of sharks prompted vigorous protests. These events demonstrate the difficulty of policy-making around animal welfare and protection issues. Add a scarcity of scholarship on policy-making pertaining to animal protec- tion in this country, and the political response to animal protection issues in Australia cannot be readily explained or understood. The status quo Where do animals fit in the Australian political landscape? If, as the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre argued, we are the sum of our actions, then the overwhelming majority of Australians would appear to support the idea that non-human animals should be subordinated to human desires. This status quo is what Joy (2010) calls ‘carnism’: an ideology that normalises animal use whether or not it is necessary for human survival. In giving a name to the ideology of animal use – just as those who avoid animal products are called vegetarians or vegans – Joy highlights a previously ‘unmarked category’. That we usually have no names for such categories reflects the tendency for the characteristics of the powerful (be that whiteness, maleness or adherence to a ‘normal’ diet) to neither have, nor need, a specific designator. This is an irony that sees the privileged as invisible, with only deviations from the norm marked out by special terminology. The assumption that the status quo is simply ‘normal’ conceals the power relations behind it. In the case of humans and animals, the per- sistent subordination of the species with which we share the planet is driven by two forces. The first is inertia. The consumption of ani- mals and animal products often occurs in the most intimate of settings, and forms the pattern of our daily lives and habits. Here Bourdieu’s
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Australian Shark Cull and the Convention on Migratory Species by Arie Trouwborst*
    Aussie Jaws and International Laws: The Australian Shark Cull and the Convention on Migratory Species by Arie Trouwborst* I. Introduction The debate concerning Western Australia’s controversial shark culling program is raging unabated.1 In order to protect swimmers and surfers, a plan to hook and kill large sharks—particularly Tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier), Bull sharks (Carcharhinas leucas) and Great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) over 3 meters in size—has been expressly authorized by the Australian central government.2 Recently, the Cornell International Law Journal Online published a piece that examined the national and international legal dimensions of the contested shark- culling program.3 This post builds on the previous piece by taking a closer look at the Bonn Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), the international legal instrument that is most on point regarding the culling program.4 In particular, it explores the merits of one of the allegations commonly voiced by conservationists, that the shark- culling program is at odds with Australia's obligations under the CMS.5 If this conservationist allegation is in fact true, then it would put quite a different perspective on the importance that the Australian government has traditionally placed on other states’ compliance with international marine megafauna protection requirements. If the Australian government is actually avoiding its obligations arising under the CMS, this would evidently affect its credibility when confronting * Arie Trouwborst (LL.M., Ph.D.) is an associate professor of environmental law at Tilburg Law School in the Netherlands. 1 See, e.g., Brendan Foster, WA Government Did Not Seek Advice from EPA over Shark Cull, Greens Say, THE GUARDIAN (March 14, 2014), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/wa-government- did-not-seek-advice-from-epa-over-shark-cull-greens-say.
    [Show full text]
  • Pua Ka Wiliwili, Nanahu Ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Pua Ka
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons@Wayne State University Wayne State University Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints WSU Press 7-1-2020 Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture Noelani Puniwai University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints Recommended Citation Puniwai, Noelani, "Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture" (2020). Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints. 174. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol_preprints/174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WSU Press at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Pua ka Wiliwili, Nanahu ka Manō: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture Noelani Puniwai1* 1Kamakakūokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, USA. *Correspondence to: Noelani Puniwai, Kamakakūokalani Center for Hawaiian Studies, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, 2645 Dole Street, Room 209BB, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA. E- mail: [email protected]. Short Title: Understanding Sharks in Hawaiian Culture KEY WORDS: SHARKS, WORLDVIEW, CLASSIFICATION, HAWAI’I, LANGUAGE. Abstract Kanaka maoli (Indigenous Hawaiians) are blessed with a written literature that documents observations and relationships with our environment in the form of chants, stories, and genealogies passed down orally for centuries. These literatures connect us to our ancestral knowledge and highlight species, places, and processes of importance. Sayings, such as this one from the Kumulipo (our creation story) Pua ka wiliwili, nanahu ka manō, is an example of the place of nature, man, and a specific creature the shark in ecological phenology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Rights Movement in Theory and Practice: a Review of the Sociological Literature Lyle Munro* School of Applied Media and Social Sciences, Monash University
    Sociology Compass 6/2 (2012): 166–181, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00440.x The Animal Rights Movement in Theory and Practice: A Review of the Sociological Literature Lyle Munro* School of Applied Media and Social Sciences, Monash University Abstract Traditionally, philosophers have had most to say about the ethics of our treatment of non-human animals (hereafter animals); it is only in recent years that social scientists have engaged with issues concerning humans and other animals. However, in the sociological literature and more generally in the emerging field of Human–Animal Studies (HAS), evidence of interest in the animal protec- tion movement is slight. This review of Eliasian theory, Marxist realism, feminism, ecofeminism, and social constructionist theory – along with key activist approaches to animal activism and advo- cacy – indicates the theoretical richness of the topic that is nonetheless empirically poor. The ani- mal protection movement is referred to here simply as the animal movement or where appropriate, as one of its three strands – animal welfare, animal liberation and animal rights. The article concludes with a discussion of how social movement theory (the ‘why’) and practice (the ‘how’) might be enhanced by social movement scholars working in collaboration with animal acti- vists. Introduction A number of writers including Tovey (2003), Hobson-West (2007), and Irvine (2008) have recently drawn attention to the rare appearance of human–animal topics in social science texts. Work in the field of Human–Animal Studies (HAS) has mainly been con- fined to specialist journals and more recently to edited anthologies of previously published articles (Arluke and Sanders 2009; Flynn 2008; Wilkie and Inglis 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Society Register
    ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN: 2544-5502 | DOI: 10.14746/sr EDITORIAL TEAM: Mariusz Baranowski (Editor-in-Chief), Marcos A. Bote (Social Policy Editor), Piotr Cichocki (Quantitative Research Editor), Sławomir Czapnik (Political Science Editor), Piotr Jabkowski (Statistics Editor), Mark D. Juszczak (International Relations), Agnieszka Kanas (Stratification and Inequality Editor), Magdalena Lemańczyk (Anthropology Editor), Urszula Markowska-Manista (Educational Sciences Editor), Bartosz Mika (Sociology of Work Editor), Kamalini Mukherjee (English language Editor), Krzysztof Nowak-Posadzy (Philoso- phy Editor), Anna Odrowąż-Coates (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Aneta Piektut (Migration Editor). POLISH EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland); Kazimierz Krzysztofek, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Roman Leppert, Kazimierz Wielki University (Poland); Renata Nowakowska-Siuta, ChAT (Poland); Inetta Nowosad, University of Zielona Góra (Poland); Ewa Przybylska, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland); Piotr Sałustowicz, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Bogusław Śliwerski, University of Lodz (Poland); Aldona Żurek, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland). INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Tony Blackshaw, Sheffield Hallam University (United King- dom); Theodore Chadjipadelis, Aristotle University Thessaloniki (Greece); Kathleen J. Farkas, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); Sribas Goswami, Serampore College, University of Calcutta (India); Bozena Hautaniemi, Stockholm University (Sweden); Kamel Lahmar, University of Sétif 2 (Algeria); Georg Kam- phausen, University of Bayreuth (Germany); Nina Michalikova, University of Central Oklahoma (US); Jaroslaw Richard Romaniuk, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); E.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Genetic Pro Ling for Improved Management of Shark Attacks on Humans
    Hunting the hunter: using genetic proling for improved management of shark attacks on humans CLUA ( [email protected] ) Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-2685 MEYER University of HAwaii LINNELL Norvegian Institute for NAture Research BAKSAY CRIOBE VIGNAUD CRIOBE VELY Direction Agriculture Aménagement et Forêt PLANES Centre NAtional Recherche Scientique Research Article Keywords: human–wildlife conict, problem individuals, barcoding, ngerprinting, eco-responsible management, selective removal Posted Date: May 25th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-549718/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License 1 Short communication 2 3 Title (max 15 words – n=14) 4 Hunting the hunter: using genetic profiling for improved management of shark attacks 5 on humans 6 7 Eric E. G. Clua1,2*, Carl Meyer3, John D. C. Linnell4,5, Sandra Baksay,1,2 Michel Vely6,7, Thomas Vignaud1,2, 8 Serge Planes1,2 9 10 1 PSL Université Paris: EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR 3278 CRIOBE, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France, 2 Laboratoire 11 d’Excellence “CORAIL,” Perpignan, France, 3 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology,University of Hawaii at Manoa, P. O. Box, 1346, 12 Kaneohe, Hawaii, USA, 4 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, PO Box 5685 Torgard, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway, 5 13 Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-2480 Koppang, Norway 6 Ministère de l’Agriculture, Direction de 14 l’Alimentation, de l’Agriculture et de la Forêt (DAAF), 21 rue de Spring, 97150 St-Martin, France 7 Megaptera association, 23 15 Rue Alexandre Dumas, 75011 Paris, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthrozoology and Sharks, Looking at How Human-Shark Interactions Have Shaped Human Life Over Time
    Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs University of Washington 2020 Committee: Marc L. Miller, Chair Vincent F. Gallucci Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Marine and Environmental Affairs © Copywrite 2020 Jessica O’Toole 2 University of Washington Abstract Anthrozoology and Public Perception: Humans and Great White Sharks (Carchardon carcharias) on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA Jessica O’Toole Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Marc L. Miller School of Marine and Environmental Affairs Anthrozoology is a relatively new field of study in the world of academia. This discipline, which includes researchers ranging from social studies to natural sciences, examines human-animal interactions. Understanding what affect these interactions have on a person’s perception of a species could be used to create better conservation strategies and policies. This thesis uses a mixed qualitative methodology to examine the public perception of great white sharks on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. While the area has a history of shark interactions, a shark related death in 2018 forced many people to re-evaluate how they view sharks. Not only did people express both positive and negative perceptions of the animals but they also discussed how the attack caused them to change their behavior in and around the ocean. Residents also acknowledged that the sharks were not the only problem living in the ocean. They often blame seals for the shark attacks, while also claiming they are a threat to the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilancio 2018
    SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 DIFENDERE CONSERVARE PROTEGGERE “Se gli oceani muoiono moriamo anche noi” Capitano Paul Watson SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 2 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 INDICE LA NOSTRA MISSION ...................................... 6 LA NOSTRA STORIA ......................................... 9 LA FLOTTA DI NETTUNO ............................... 56 CAMPAGNE GLOBALI ..................................... 60 SEA SHEPHERD DIVE .................................... 71 RACCOLTA FONDI ............................................. 72 SEA SHEPHERD GLOBAL ............................. 74 SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA.................................. 76 CAMPAGNE ITALIANE .................................... 84 ATTIVITÀ DI SSIO ............................................... 96 MEDIA communication .......................... 108 BILANCIO SOCIALE .......................................... 112 FONTI DI FINANZIAMENTO ......................... 119 SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 4 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 AAIU TENERET INA MARECI LE NAVI SOSTENENENDO SEA SHEPHERD, PUOI AIUTARCI A TENERE IN MARE LE NAVI E GLI EQUIPAGGI DI VOLONTARI, CHE OGNI GIORNO DIFENDONO LA VITA NEI NOSTRI OCEANI. economico necessario: • Donazione mensile (DAC) • Donazione tramite PayPal • 5x1000 • Versamento postale • Sea Shepherd Italia Onlus Via Rosso di San Secondo, 7 - 20134 Milano [email protected] http://www.seashepherd.it/aiutaci/ Codice Fiscale: 97560620151 LA NOSTRA MISSION SEA SHEPHERD ITALIA ONLUS 6 BILANCIO SOCIALE 2018 CHI SIAMO IL NOSTRO APPROCCIO Costituita
    [Show full text]
  • ANZSOG Case Program Off the Hook: Western Australia’S Shark Cull (A) 2015-171.1
    ANZSOG Case Program Off the hook: Western Australia’s shark cull (A) 2015-171.1 For Bryn Martin 10 October 2011 began, like most other days, in the sparkling waters of Cottesloe. The sixty-four year old swam out to a pylon about 400 metres from shore, just as he had done for more than a decade. In one direction, the Indian Ocean stretched uninterrupted to the horizon; in the other, locals and visitors were busy enjoying Perth’s most popular beach. Amongst those on shore were Martin’s wife and family. When he failed to arrive for breakfast as planned, they immediately suspected something was amiss. After more than an hour scanning the area, his wife reported him missing to emergency services. No trace of Bryn Martin could be found, save for a pair of slashed swimming trunks. Witnesses recalled seeing some splashing and a large shadowy shape near where he disappeared. The Western Australian coroner later heard that the damage to his bathing suit was consistent with a shark attack, most likely, a great white. The incident left local residents and the wider community shaken. Cottesloe was where Ken Crew bled to death on the sand after being attacked by a shark in waist-deep water. Onlookers likened the 2000 incident to a scene from the film Jaws and the government issued an immediate but unsuccessful catch-and-kill order.1 Meanwhile, less than a month prior to Martin’s disappearance, twenty-one year old Kyle Burden was attacked by a shark whilst body-boarding in the Margaret River region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ecotourism and Citizen Science
    ARTICLE IN PRESS The Economy of Shark Conservation in the Northeast Pacific: The Role of Ecotourism and Citizen Science Peter A. Mieras*,1, Chris Harvey-Clark†, Michael Bear‡, Gina Hodgin§, Boone Hodgin§ *Rendezvous Dive Adventures, Port Alberni, BC, Canada †Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, NS, Canada ‡Ocean Sanctuaries, San Diego, CA, United States § Ravencroft Lodge, Valdez, AK, United States 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] First Nation image of a six gill shark. Courtesy: Artist: Kelly Foxcroft-poirier. Contents 1. Introduction 78 2. Development of Shark-Based Ecotourism in the NEP 82 2.1 Recreational Fisheries for Sharks 83 2.2 Shark Encounters 85 2.3 Citizen Science 98 2.4 Case Studies 100 3. Conclusion 107 References 108 Abstract Historically sharks have been seen either as a source of income through harvesting, or as a nuisance and danger. The economic value of sharks has traditionally been measured as the total value of sharks caught for liver oil, fins, or meat for consumption. Sharks have also been killed to near extinction in cases where they were seen as a threat to fisheries # Advances in Marine Biology 2017 Elsevier Ltd 77 ISSN 0065-2881 All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.amb.2017.08.003 ARTICLE IN PRESS 78 Peter A. Mieras et al. on other species. This is illustrated by the mass extermination of Basking Sharks (Cetorhinus maximus) in British Columbia. They were seen as a nuisance to fishermen as they got entangled in gill nets during the salmon fishing season. However with the development of the SCUBA diving industry, and ecotourism in general, increased awareness of the role sharks play in marine ecosystems has resulted in changes in how they are perceived and utilized.
    [Show full text]
  • RESISTANCE in DYSTOPIAN FICTION a Thesis in Fulfilment Of
    RESISTANCE IN DYSTOPIAN FICTION A Thesis in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Creative Arts by Darren Dillman March 2020 Western Sydney University 1 Statement of Authentication The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original except as acknowledged in the text. I hereby declare that I have not submitted this material, either in full or in part, for a degree at this or any other institution. (signature) 2 Abstract This thesis attempts to answer the fundamental question, "How does resistance function in dystopian fiction?" and considers the value of memory and technology within this context. It also articulates the themes of the research within a creative work, a dystopian novel titled The Department of Retribution. With the rising popularity of dystopian fiction, the findings of this project attempt to provide timely insight into why resistance is essential to the genre and how it can be employed via memory and technology. Within the scope of authoritarian structures and their ideological origins, this thesis examines the methods protagonists of dystopian fiction use to push back against oppressive means of control. It discusses memory and its value to characters who resist the state's official narrative of the past, and it examines the ways in which the pitfalls of humanity's reliance on technology are portrayed in dystopian works. The Department of Retribution takes place in a future United States where hard drugs such as methamphetamine have been legalized, fatal combat sports dominate television, and a fourth branch of government, the Corporate Council, wields dominant power.
    [Show full text]
  • A Defense of a Sentiocentric Approach to Environmental Ethics
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2012 Minding Nature: A Defense of a Sentiocentric Approach to Environmental Ethics Joel P. MacClellan University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation MacClellan, Joel P., "Minding Nature: A Defense of a Sentiocentric Approach to Environmental Ethics. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1433 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Joel P. MacClellan entitled "Minding Nature: A Defense of a Sentiocentric Approach to Environmental Ethics." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Philosophy. John Nolt, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Jon Garthoff, David Reidy, Dan Simberloff Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) MINDING NATURE: A DEFENSE OF A SENTIOCENTRIC APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joel Patrick MacClellan August 2012 ii The sedge is wither’d from the lake, And no birds sing.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Senate Inquiry Into Shark Mitigation and Deterrent Measures
    Submission to the Senate Inquiry into Shark mitigation and deterrent measures Duncan Leadbitter March 2017 Overview The submission puts forward information to support the following claims and conclusions: 1. The beach meshing programs are culls designed to reduce shark numbers to an unspecified low level on regional scales of several hundreds of kilometres. 2. The recent growth in the number of culling programs carries the potential for cumulative impacts on targeted sharks and, in particular, the Great White Shark. 3. There is no publicly available assessment of the potential, cumulative impacts of the culls on the Great White Shark, which is listed under the EPBC Act. There is no estimate of what level of (non natural) mortality the shark population on the East Coast can withstand. 4. There is no evidence that culling has any measurable influence on the number of shark attacks and thus the culling may be putting sharks at risk for no benefit. 5. The Recovery Plan for the Great White Shark contains little more than a series of commitments to research and information gathering. Unlike the sorts of rigorous, accountable plans put in place to manage commercial fisheries, this vulnerable species is not protected from depletion to levels that may hinder reproductive capacity. 6. The Minister administering the EPBC Act may not be implementing Australia’s commitment to implement the Law of the Sea. Recommendations 1. Population models for the targeted species and in particular the Great White Shark should be prepared by independent scientists and used to evaluate the potential impacts of the growing number of culls; 2.
    [Show full text]