DOCSLIB.ORG

Society Register

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Society Register ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN: 2544-5502 | DOI: 10.14746/sr EDITORIAL TEAM: Mariusz Baranowski (Editor-in-Chief), Marcos A. Bote (Social Policy Editor), Piotr Cichocki (Quantitative Research Editor), Sławomir Czapnik (Political Science Editor), Piotr Jabkowski (Statistics Editor), Mark D. Juszczak (International Relations), Agnieszka Kanas (Stratification and Inequality Editor), Magdalena Lemańczyk (Anthropology Editor), Urszula Markowska-Manista (Educational Sciences Editor), Bartosz Mika (Sociology of Work Editor), Kamalini Mukherjee (English language Editor), Krzysztof Nowak-Posadzy (Philoso- phy Editor), Anna Odrowąż-Coates (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Aneta Piektut (Migration Editor). POLISH EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland); Kazimierz Krzysztofek, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Roman Leppert, Kazimierz Wielki University (Poland); Renata Nowakowska-Siuta, ChAT (Poland); Inetta Nowosad, University of Zielona Góra (Poland); Ewa Przybylska, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland); Piotr Sałustowicz, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Bogusław Śliwerski, University of Lodz (Poland); Aldona Żurek, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland). INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Tony Blackshaw, Sheffield Hallam University (United King- dom); Theodore Chadjipadelis, Aristotle University Thessaloniki (Greece); Kathleen J. Farkas, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); Sribas Goswami, Serampore College, University of Calcutta (India); Bozena Hautaniemi, Stockholm University (Sweden); Kamel Lahmar, University of Sétif 2 (Algeria); Georg Kam- phausen, University of Bayreuth (Germany); Nina Michalikova, University of Central Oklahoma (US); Jaroslaw Richard Romaniuk, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); E. Wayne Ross, University of British Columbia (Canada); Luca Salmieri, Sapienza University (Italy); Nora Schleicher, Budapest Metropolitan Uni- versity (Hungary); Angela Scollan, Middlesex University London (United Kingdom); Alan Segal, Grande Prairie Regional College, Alberta (Canada), Darrick Smith, University of San Francisco (US); Paul Spicker, Robert Gor- don University (United Kingdom); Wolfgang Streeck, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (Germany). Text revision: Kamalini Mukherjee DTP: SR team The original version of the journal is an online edition published on the following websites: http://societyregister.eu/ https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sr Society Register is co-financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (under the ‘Support for scien- tific journals’ programme). Abstracting/indexing services: ARIANTA, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), CEJSH (The Central Euro- pean Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities), CEON (Centrum Otwartej Nauki), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), EuroPub Database, PKP Index, IC Journals Master List, ROAD Directory of Open Access scholarly Resources, POL-index, SSOAR (Social Science Open Access Repository), Google Scholar, WorldCat, NUKAT. Published by: Editorial Office: Faculty of Sociology Faculty of Sociology Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-568 Poznań, Poland Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-568 Poznań, Poland E-mail: [email protected] Tel. +48 61 8292227 SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / VOL. 3, NO. 3 EDITED BY HANNA MAMZER CONTENTS #INTRODUCTION HANNA MAMZER ANIMAL TURN AS A META-TURN? . 07 #ARTICLES YOTAM WERZANSKY-ORLAND WHAT IS AN ANIMAL: LEARNING FROM THE PAST – LOOKING TO THE FUTURE . 19 AMY P. WILSON (NON) HUMAN(IMAL) RIGHTS: DISMANTLING THE SEPARATENESS IN LAW AND POLICY . 39 GEETA SHYAM HOW COMMUNITY ATTITUDES CAN STRENGTHEN ARGUMENTS FOR CHANGING THE LEGAL STATUS OF ANIMALS . 67 AVIVA VINCENT, SHELBY MCDONALD, BETHANIE POE & VICKI DEISNER THE LINK BETWEEN INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE AND ANIMAL ABUSE . 83 AGNIESZKA BIELSKA-BRODZIAK, MARLENA DRAPALSKA-GROCHOWICZ & MAREK SUSKA SYMBOLIC PROTECTION OF ANIMALS . 103 BIRGITTA WAHLBERG RE-EVALUATION OF ANIMAL PROTECTION BY THE FINNISH ANIMAL RIGHTS LAWYERS SOCIETY . 123 #DISCUSSIONS AND RESEARCH NOTES DAVID FAVRE THE GROWING REALITY OF LEGAL RIGHTS FOR COMPANION ANIMALS . 143 TOMASZ PIETRZYKOWSKI ANIMAL LAW: ETHICS, SOCIETY AND CONSTITUTIONS . 151 SACHA LUCASSEN ANIMAL-BASED MEASURES: A STEP TOWARDS RIGHTS FOR FARM ANIMALS? . 159 HANNA MAMZER ANINAL AS AN ALIEN . 167 AGNIESZKA ŻOK & EWA BAUM SOMEONE BETWEEN: ETHICAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS OF HUMAN AND (NON)HUMAN ANIMAL ENHANCEMENT . 179 SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / 3(3): 7-17 ISSN 2544–5502 DOI: 10.14746/sr.2019.3.3.01 ANIMAL TURN AS A META-TURN?1 HANNA MAMZER1 1 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Szamarzewskiego 89 C, 60-568 Poznań, Poland. ORCID: 0000- 0002-2251-7639, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Human sciences as a reflection of social transformations fluctuate with dynamic changes of current cognitive paradigms. Following the textual and visual turn and the turn towards things (objects), there are intensified tendencies to think in terms of an “animal turn”, which becomes close not only to activists and pro-ani- mal activists but also to scientifically engaged humanists. I believe, however, that the animal turn should be treated as a meta-turn: a process that requires a change in the relationship between the reflecting subject and the object of reflection, and not only as a specific kind of representation of the surrounding world. In the proposed text, I attempt to analyze the causes of the turn towards animals. I also address the theme of cognitive resistance in view of the recognition of animal studies as a fully-fledged theoretical and research area of contemporary humanities. KEYWORDS: animal turn, turn to animals’ relations, man, animal, animal studies Nowadays, humanities and social sciences when attempting to describe and analyze the social and cultural reality are guided by cognitive pluralism, embedded in a post- modern perspective which proposes to adopt the assumptions of the process of inter- 1 This article was published in Polish as subchapter titled “Zwrot animalistyczny jako meta-zwrot” in Mamzer Hanna and Isański Jakub. 2018. Socjologia kultury w świecie inteligentnych zwierząt i uczących się maszyn. Bydgoszcz: Epigram. 8 SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / VOL. 3., NO. 3 preting reality for all the reflections. We must however be ready to accept the conse- quences of these assumptions: the obvious existence of many interpretations of the world. Each of these interpretations is realized through a unique kind of discourse based on a peculiar metaphor and a peculiar language. The multitude of the created mental worlds makes us realize that the reflecting subject has no access to the world as such - it has access only to the representation of the world, created through the mind that discovers this world. As I wrote in another place: “The concept of repre- senting reality through various forms of reflection arises in humanistic discourse from the approach proposing the assumption as the basic thesis that objective recreation of reality is not possible, that it always requires the use of a kind of “community” per- spectives (borrowed, of course, from the influence of culture and social context) that alter not only the form but also the meaning of the analyzed phenomena. Psycholog- ically, this is a universally accepted process when considering the accuracy of human perception. However, the popularization of approaches emphasizing the importance of interpretation has also allowed to propagate the idea of transforming the perceived world, not only on the level of mental processes taking place in the mind of the sub- ject, but above all on the level of socially regulated cultural processes that influence the way of seeing, writing and understanding the world and the way of transferring the knowledge about it” (Mamzer 2008: 62). The representation of the reality through the metaphors of discourses has until now taken two significantly visible forms - textual turn embedded in poststructural- ism and carrying a rational message, and the opposite visual turn embedded in post- modernism, which restores intuition and emotions and their role in human percep- tion of the world. This opposition was formed on the basis of the Cartesian concept of psycho-physical dualism: not only antagonizing these two ways of cognition, but also hierarchizing them in such a way that the discredited emotional cognition was for many years removed from research practice as inferior, unworthy and… feminine. The Descartes’ way of looking at the world of living beings only strengthened the vi- sion already proposed in ancient times, especially by Aristotle: “The post-humanistic perspective is associated with animal studies only when it implies a critical attitude towards anthropocentrism and not an anticipation of the post-human or the post-hu- man era. In our culture, the privileged status of man inherited from the Greeks and strengthened by Christianity involves the glorification of the mind, the language and the immortal soul” (Bakke 2011:199). Thus, both the hierarchical perception of the world built on anthropocentrism and the strengthening of psychic-somatic opposi- tion (and thus: emotional opposition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Progressivism Cass R
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2005 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cass R. Sunstein, "A New Progressivism" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 245, 2005). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO JOHN M. OLIN LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 245 (2D SERIES) A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO May 2005 This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Chicago Working Paper Series Index: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html and at the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=726443 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein* Abstract Based on an address for a conference on Law and Transformation in South Africa, this paper explores problems with two twentieth-century approaches to government: the way of markets and the way of planning. It urge that the New Progressivism simultaneously offers (1) a distinctive conception of government’s appropriate means, an outgrowth of the late-twentieth-century critique of economic planning, and (2) a distinctive understanding of government’s appropriate ends, an outgrowth of evident failures with market arrangements and largely a product of the mid-twentieth-century critique of laissez faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals and Ethics Fall, 2017, P
    Philosophy 174a Ethics and Animals Fall 2017 Instructor: Teaching Fellow: Chris Korsgaard Ahson Azmat 205 Emerson Hall [email protected] [email protected] Office Hours: Mondays 1:30-3:30 Description: Do human beings have moral obligations to the other animals? If so, what are they, and why? Should or could non-human animals have legal rights? Should we treat wild and domestic animals differently? Do human beings have the right to eat the other animals, raise them for that purpose on factory farms, use them in experiments, display them in zoos and circuses, make them race or fight for our entertainment, make them work for us, and keep them as pets? We will examine the work of utilitarian, Kantian, and Aristotelian philosophers, and others who have tried to answer these questions. This course, when taken for a letter grade, meets the General Education requirement for Ethical Reasoning. Sources and How to Get Them: Many of the sources from we will be reading from onto the course web site, but you will need to have copies of Singer’s Animal Liberation, Regan’s The Case for Animal Rights, Mill’s Utilitarianism and Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals. I have ordered all the main books from which we will be reading (except my own book, which is not yet published) at the Coop. The main books we will be using are: Animal Liberation, by Peter Singer. Updated edition, 2009, by Harper Collins Publishers. The Case for Animal Rights, by Tom Regan. University of California Press, 2004. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals, by Christine M.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Survey of Perceptions of the 2014 FIFA World
    An international survey of perceptions of the 2014 FIFA World Cup: National levels of corruption as a context for perceptions of institutional corruption John Nezlek, David Newman, Astrid Schütz, Roy Baumeister, Joanna Schug, Mohsen Joshanloo, Paulo Lopes, Nicholas Alt, Marzena Cypryańska, Marco Depietri, et al. To cite this version: John Nezlek, David Newman, Astrid Schütz, Roy Baumeister, Joanna Schug, et al.. An international survey of perceptions of the 2014 FIFA World Cup: National levels of corruption as a context for per- ceptions of institutional corruption. PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2019, 14 (9), pp.e0222492. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222492. hal-02415439 HAL Id: hal-02415439 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02415439 Submitted on 6 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License RESEARCH ARTICLE An international survey of perceptions of the 2014 FIFA World Cup: National levels of corruption as a context for perceptions of institutional corruption 1,2 3 4 5 John B. NezlekID *, David B. Newman , Astrid SchuÈ tz , Roy F. Baumeister , 2 6 7 8 Joanna SchugID , Mohsen Joshanloo , Paulo N.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M
    Boston College Law Review Volume 43 Article 2 Issue 3 Number 3 5-1-2002 Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M. Wise Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Wise, Rattling the Cage Defended, 43 B.C.L. Rev. 623 (2002), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol43/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RATTLING THE CAGE DEFENDED STEVEN M. WISE* Abstract: In Rattling the Cage: Toward Levi Rights for Animals, the author advocated basic legal rights—specifically common law rights—for chimpanzees, bonobos, and other nonhuman animals. In this Article, the author responds to many of the major criticisms of Rattling the Cage. The author confronts critics of his historical arguments for legal rights for nonhuman animals, tracing those arguments through ancient philosophy and nineteenth century English statutes. The author also expands upon his legal arguments for animal rights, reexamining various theories of rights and justifications for treating animals as property, Finally, borrowing from his upcoming book Drawing the Line: Science and The Case for Animal Rights, the author defends his advocacy of legal rights for nonhuman animals based on the relative autonomy nonhuman animals possess. INTRODUCTION "The 'animal rights' movement is gathering steam and Steven Wise is one of the pistons."l Thus Judge Richard Posner began a Yale Law Journal review of my book, Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals, published in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Program Here
    Memory Studies Association Third Annual Conference Complutense University Madrid 25 - 28 June 2019 PROGRAM Original title: Memory Studies Association Third Annual Conference Program Edited by: Ministerio de Justicia, Secretaría General Técnica NIPO (paper): 051-19-021-7 NIPO (pdf): 051-19-022-2 Depósito Legal: M 21979-2019 Catálogo de publicaciones de la Administración General del Estado: http://cpage.mpr.gob.es Program cover by Jimena Diaz Ocón, CC-BY-NC Index Index Welcome .............................................................................................. 5 About the MSA ................................................................................... 11 Conference venues ............................................................................. 15 Instructions to access the Conference WIFI ....................................... 29 Preconference events ......................................................................... 31 Program overview .............................................................................. 37 Keynotes and Special sessions ...........................................................43 Parallel sessions I ................................................................................ 49 Parallel sessions II ............................................................................... 63 Parallel sessions III .............................................................................. 77 Parallel sessions IV ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights
    Book Review Animal Rights Richard A. Posner' Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rightsfor Animals. By Steven M. Wise. Cambridge,Mass.: PerseusBooks, 2000. Pp. 362. $25.00. The "animal rights" movement is gathering steam, and Steven Wise is one of the pistons. A lawyer whose practice is the protection of animals, he has now written a book in which he urges courts in the exercise of their common-law powers of legal rulemaking to confer legally enforceable rights on animals, beginning with chimpanzees and bonobos (the two most intelligent primate species).' Although Wise is well-informed about his subject-the biological as well as legal aspects-this is not an intellectually exciting book. I do not say this in criticism. Remember who Wise is: a practicing lawyer who wants to persuade the legal profession that courts should do much more to protect animals. Judicial innovation proceeds incrementally; as Holmes put it, the courts, in their legislative capacity, "are confined from molar to molecular motions."2 Wise's practitioner's perspective is, as we shall see, both the strength and the weakness of the book. f Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School. I thank Michael Boudin, Richard Epstein, Lawrence Lessig, Martha Nussbaum, Charlene Posner, and Cass Sunstein for their very helpful comments on a previous draft of this Review. * Adjunct Professor, John Marshall Law School; Adjunct Professor, Vermont Law School; President, Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights; Partner, Wise & Slater-Wise, Boston. 1. These are closely related species, and Wise discusses them more or less interchangeably.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Rights Movement in Theory and Practice: a Review of the Sociological Literature Lyle Munro* School of Applied Media and Social Sciences, Monash University
    Sociology Compass 6/2 (2012): 166–181, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00440.x The Animal Rights Movement in Theory and Practice: A Review of the Sociological Literature Lyle Munro* School of Applied Media and Social Sciences, Monash University Abstract Traditionally, philosophers have had most to say about the ethics of our treatment of non-human animals (hereafter animals); it is only in recent years that social scientists have engaged with issues concerning humans and other animals. However, in the sociological literature and more generally in the emerging field of Human–Animal Studies (HAS), evidence of interest in the animal protec- tion movement is slight. This review of Eliasian theory, Marxist realism, feminism, ecofeminism, and social constructionist theory – along with key activist approaches to animal activism and advo- cacy – indicates the theoretical richness of the topic that is nonetheless empirically poor. The ani- mal protection movement is referred to here simply as the animal movement or where appropriate, as one of its three strands – animal welfare, animal liberation and animal rights. The article concludes with a discussion of how social movement theory (the ‘why’) and practice (the ‘how’) might be enhanced by social movement scholars working in collaboration with animal acti- vists. Introduction A number of writers including Tovey (2003), Hobson-West (2007), and Irvine (2008) have recently drawn attention to the rare appearance of human–animal topics in social science texts. Work in the field of Human–Animal Studies (HAS) has mainly been con- fined to specialist journals and more recently to edited anthologies of previously published articles (Arluke and Sanders 2009; Flynn 2008; Wilkie and Inglis 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot
    A Backdoor to Policy Making: The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot The Supreme Court's decisions in Vacco v Quill' and Wash- ington v Glucksberg2 held that a state can ban assisted suicide without violating the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. In these high profile cases, six phi- losophers filed an amicus brief ("Philosophers'Brief') that argued for the recognition of a constitutional right to die.3 Although the brief was written by six of the most prominent American philoso- phers-Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson-the Court made no mention of the brief in unanimously reaching the oppo- site conclusion.4 In light of the Court's recent failure to engage philosophical arguments, this Comment examines the conditions under which philosophy does and should affect judicial decision making. These questions are relevant in considering the proper role of the Court in controversial political questions and are central to a recent de- bate focusing on whether the law can still be considered an autonomous discipline that relies only on traditional legal sources. Scholars concerned with law and economics and critical legal studies have argued that the law is no longer autonomous, but rather that it does and should draw on many external sources in order to resolve legal disputes. Critics of this view have main- tained that legal reasoning is distinct from other disciplines, and that the law has and should maintain its own methods, conven- tions, and conclusions. This Comment follows the latter group of scholars, and ar- gues that the Court should, as it did in the right-to-die cases, stay clear of philosophy and base its decisions on history, precedent, and a recognition of the limits of judicial authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetics of the Encounter: Animals, Ethics, and God by Brandi Estey-Burtt
    The Poetics of the Encounter: Animals, Ethics, and God By Brandi Estey-Burtt A Thesis Submitted to Atlantic School of Theology, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Theology and Religious Studies March, 2014, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright Brandi Estey-Burtt, 2014 Approved: Dr. Alyda Faber Supervisor Approved: Dr. Susan Slater Reader Approved: Dr. Alice Brittan Examiner Date: 14 March 2014 The Poetics of the Encounter: Animals, Ethics, and God by Brandi Estey-Burtt Abstract Despite growing interest in the past two decades, animal ethics remains a relatively minute area of theology. Some writings have emerged in theological circles arguing for animal rights or even for how to conceive of animals in terms of conventional theological notions such as souls and salvation. However, not many examine ideas and ways of living and being with animals in the ordinary, even mundane, situations of daily life. I suggest we need to cultivate ethical imagination in our interaction with animals, and that one way to do this involves coming face-to-face with them and being attentive to our embodiment. I draw on philosopher Emmanuel Levinas as well as theopoetics to represent the ethical experience of the encounter. Texts such as The Lives of Animals and Disgrace by JM Coetzee provide examples of how we may engage our ethical and theological imagination in day-to-day encounters with animals. 14 March 2014 Table of Contents Acknowledgements Introduction: Animal Ethics and Christian Theology..........................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • A EUROPEAN SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCE for SPORT and PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (ESSA-Sport)
    A EUROPEAN SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCE FOR SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (ESSA-Sport) NATIONAL REPORT POLAND Agreement reference number – 2016-3283/001-001 Project number – 575668-EPP-1-2016-1-FR-EPPKA2-SSA-N TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 2 1. THE ESSA-SPORT PROJECT AND BACKGROUND TO THE NATIONAL REPORT ............................................ 4 2. NATIONAL KEY FACTS AND OVERALL DATA ON THE LABOUR MARKET ................................................... 8 3. THE NATIONAL SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SECTOR ...................................................................... 13 4. SPORT LABOUR MARKET STATISTICS ................................................................................................... 28 5. NATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM .................................................................................. 46 6. NATIONAL SPORT EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM ....................................................................... 52 7. FINDINGS FROM THE EMPLOYER SURVEY............................................................................................ 57 8. REPORT ON NATIONAL CONSULTATIONS ............................................................................................ 98 9. NATIONAL CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................. 102 10. NATIONAL ACTION PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, Published by Sydney University Press
    This document is an extract from Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy, published by Sydney University Press. ISBN: 9781743324738 (paperback) 9781743324745 (ebook: epub) 9781743325025 (ebook: PDF) All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA [email protected] sydney.edu.au/sup Parts of this work are available on the University of Sydney eScholarship Repository at hdl.handle.net/2123/15349. Please cite the full work as: Chen, Peter John (2016). Animal Welfare in Australia: Politics and Policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press. The book may be purchased from Sydney University Press at the following link: http://purl.library.usyd.edu.au/sup/animalwelfareinaus. Animal welfare in Australia ANIMAL PUBLICS Melissa Boyde & Fiona Probyn-Rapsey, Series Editors Other titles in the series: Animal death Ed. Jay Johnston & Fiona Probyn-Rapsey Animals in the Anthropocene: critical perspectives on non-human futures Ed. The Human Animal Research Network Editorial Collective Cane toads: a tale of sugar, politics and flawed science Nigel Turvey Engaging with animals: interpretations of a shared existence Ed. Georgette Leah Burns & Mandy Paterson Fighting nature: travelling menageries, animal acts and war shows Peta Tait Animal welfare in Australia Policy and politics Peter John Chen First published by Sydney University Press © Peter John Chen 2016 © Sydney University Press 2016 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission.
    [Show full text]