Why We Should Build a Moon Village

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why We Should Build a Moon Village MOON VILLAGE Why we should build a Moon village Ian Crawford explains how science would benefit from a human outpost on the Moon. he director general of the European kind of transportation and other infrastruc- Specific planetary science activities that Space Agency, Jan Wörner, has sug- ture required to establish a Moon village would benefit from such a lunar surface Tgested that the creation of a human– would likely facilitate human and robotic infrastructure include (see e.g. NRC 2007, robotic lunar outpost would be a logical operations at locations that may not be local Crawford & Joy 2014, Neal et al. 2014, and next step in human space exploration to the village itself. Moreover, references cited therein) (e.g. Wörner & Foing 2016). The creation in the fullness of time, just as “The lunar geological inner solar system bom- of such a Moon village (figure 1) would in Antarctica today, we might record still has much to bardment history, impact offer significant scientific opportunities by envisage multiple such out- tell us about the early cratering processes, the lunar providing an infrastructure on the lunar posts at different locations. solar system” interior including volatile surface, analogous to the way that human With these caveats in mind, content, regolith processes outposts in Antarctica (figure 2) facilitate we here address the major areas of science and serendipitous discoveries. research activities across multiple scien- that would benefit from the scientific infra- The lunar cratering rate is used to tific disciplines on that continent. In the structure represented by a Moon village. estimate the ages of cratered surfaces case of a Moon village, scientific fields that throughout the solar system, but it is not might benefit include planetary science, Planetary science well calibrated (e.g. Robbins 2014). Improv- astronomy, astrobiology, life sciences and As discussed by Crawford & Joy (2014), ing this calibration is a key objective of fundamental physics (e.g. Taylor 1985, the lunar geological record still has much planetary science, and requires sampling Ehrenfreund et al. 2012, McKay 2013, Craw- to tell us about the earliest history of the impact melt deposits from multiple (ideally ford & Joy 2014). In addition, a Moon village solar system, the origin and evolution of the hundreds) of impact craters of a wide range would help assess the economic potential Earth–Moon system, the geological evolu- of ages. In addition, recovering fragments of lunar resources, while also acting as a tion of rocky planets, and the near-Earth of the impacting bodies would reveal how market for them (e.g. Crawford 2015). cosmic environment throughout solar sys- and if the population of impactors has The extent to which different scientific tem history. Having humans operating on changed with time (Joy et al. 2012, 2016). fields would benefit from a lunar outpost the lunar surface would enable much better Accessing these materials requires a signifi- would, in part, depend on its location and access to this record, especially if supported cant transportation infrastructure (such as on the length of time for which it is occu- by a scientific infrastructure such as that pressurized rovers; figure 3) on the lunar pied. Some of the scientific areas discussed envisaged for the Moon village. A much surface, a significant sample return capacity below are more dependent on these factors wider range of rock and soil samples could and, ideally, in situ analytical instruments. than others. For example, science questions be collected, analysed (and, if necessary, Impact cratering is a fundamental plan- related to the lunar poles would clearly shipped to Earth), and the base would sup- etary process, but our understanding of it is benefit more from a polar Moon village port implementation of complex explora- limited by lack of access to pristine craters than an equatorial one. Nevertheless, the tory activities such as subsurface drilling. of a wide range of sizes. The lunar surface 6.18 A&G • December 2017 • Vol. 58 • aandg.org MOON VILLAGE 1 (Left) Artist’s impression of a Moon village. (ESA) facilitated by a human and 2 (Below) The Amundsen–Scott research station at Earth’s South Pole. robotic infrastructure on the Such outposts provide a scientific infrastructure that supports research Moon. Key aspects include in multiple disciplines (e.g. astronomy, atmospheric science, biology, low-frequency radio astron- glaciology, geology, magnetospheric physics, meteoritics and zoology) on omy, optical and infrared the Antarctic continent that would be difficult or impossible to sustain astronomy, high-energy otherwise. Lunar research stations will fulfil the same function astrophysics and funda- on the Moon. (NSF) mental physics. 3 (Right) The Lunar Electric Rover, under development by Radio wavelengths NASA. Many lunar science activities will require the ability to longer than about 10 m move away from the outpost, requiring pressurized rovers, cannot penetrate the but conversely a lunar outpost will provide the facilities to Earth’s ionosphere, yet maintain, recharge and upgrade such vehicles. (NASA) much valuable scientific information is expected to lie in this low-frequency range (e.g. Jester & Falcke 2009). The lunar farside, which is permanently shielded from the Earth, is probably the best location in the inner solar system for such observations and a human infrastructure on the Moon would assist in the setting up of the neces- sary equipment (although care would also be required to ensure that human opera- tions do not degrade the natural radio- quietness of the location). Although the Moon could in principle provide a platform for optical and infrared telescopes, there is a consensus that free- flying satellites (e.g. at the Earth–Sun L2 point) probably provide better platforms for such activities (Lester et al. 2004). It is certainly true that some aspects of the lunar surface environment (e.g. dust and, in most locations, extreme diurnal temperature clearly exhibits the required diversity of meteorites have played in delivering vola- ranges) are not ideal for astronomical obser- craters. Using these craters to improve our tile substances to the terrestrial planets. vations at these wavelengths. Nevertheless, knowledge of impact cratering processes Determining the nature and extent of these access to a scientific infrastructure able requires visiting many craters of a wide volatiles requires surface activities (includ- to emplace, maintain and upgrade such range of sizes and ages to conduct sam- ing sampling and near-surface drilling) at instruments (the value of which has been pling, geophysical surveys and, possibly, polar and high-latitude locations. demonstrated by multiple HST servicing subsurface drilling. The lunar surface is a natural labora- missions) might compensate for these dis- The Moon provides an excellent example tory for understanding space weathering advantages. Moreover, the stability of the of a small rocky body that largely preserves and regolith processes throughout the lunar surface may be enabling in the con- its internal structure from solar system, through time. text of building optical/IR interferometric shortly after its formation. As “The Moon could be Access to regoliths of differ- arrays, and permanently shadowed polar such it can provide insights a useful platform ent composition, thickness craters might enable passive cooling of IR into the early geological for astronomical and latitude are required to instruments. The pros and cons of the lunar evolution of larger and more observations” improve our knowledge of surface for optical/IR astronomy still need complicated planets. To bet- these processes. to be properly assessed and a lunar outpost ter understand the structure, composition Humans are unique in our ability to would at least facilitate such an assessment. and evolution of the lunar interior requires recognize the significance of new observa- As the lunar surface is not shielded by emplacement of geophysical tools (e.g. tions or phen om ena, even if they were not either an atmosphere or a magnetic field seismic networks and magnetic surveys), anticipated. Having humans living and (other than the Sun’s heliospheric mag- as well as sampling a wide range of lunar working on the lunar surface for long peri- netic field) it is an attractive location from crustal and volcanic rocks of diverse ages ods is likely to result in unanticipated dis- which to study the flux and composition and compositions. Such studies would also coveries that might not otherwise be made. of primary cosmic rays. This can also be help constrain theories of lunar origin. Although unquantifiable, such discoveries done in free space, but the existence of a There is now convincing evidence may ultimately prove to be among the most human and robotic infrastructure on the that water ice exists within permanently significant to result from a lunar outpost. lunar surface may facilitate the installation shadowed polar craters, and that hydrated of the required instrumentation. Similar materials also exist at high-latitude (but Astronomy arguments apply for gamma-ray and X-ray not permanently shadowed) localities (see The lunar surface is a potentially useful observations. Anand 2010 for a review). In addition to platform for astronomical observations Although not a major driver for lunar their possible value as resources (dis- (e.g. Burns et al. 1990, Crawford & Zarnecki exploration, several areas of fundamental cussed below), such deposits would inform 2008), and establishing the equipment physics research may benefit from the sci- our knowledge of the role comets and required for such observations would be entific infrastructure represented by a lunar A&G • December 2017 • Vol. 58 • aandg.org 6.19 MOON VILLAGE 4 Several lunar science objectives require accessing the subsurface and may require drilling to depths of tens or hundreds of metres (e.g. Crawford et al. 2010). A lunar outpost would provide the background supporting infrastructure required to enable such activities, just as Antarctic research stations are required to support scientific drilling on that continent.
Recommended publications
  • International Space Exploration Strategy Group International Space Exploration
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP ADVANCING THE EXPLORATION FRONTIER For the last forty years, human In recent years multiple reports define exploration in the coming space exploration has made have recommended international decades. significant progress through partners come together for The group will bring together the international collaboration. The strategic planning activities. interests of all human spaceflight Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and However, many national partners, rather than national Shuttle-Mir Programs marked government planning activities interests subject to changing the end of the Space Race, are severely limited in their political influences. and advanced long duration consideration of international This project provides a unique spaceflight. The International partners. Furthermore, opportunity for current and Space Station (ISS) is now in its government and industry recent graduate student second decade as a continuously planners may not have access researchers to collaborate with occupied human outpost in Low- to the latest technologies being others from around the world. Earth Orbit (LEO). While we developed at leading research Most importantly, participants expect productive utilization of institutions around the world. will have the opportunity to ISS through at least 2020, there We believe an international influence the government and is currently no internationally graduate student working group industry decision makers that recognized program for human is well-suited to generate and define future human exploration exploration beyond LEO. communicate the ideas that will strategy. 3 INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP LEADERSHIP Edward Crawley is President of the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech).
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Utilization and Site Selection for a Self-Sufficient Martian Outpost
    NASA/TM-98-206538 Resource Utilization and Site Selection for a Self-Sufficient Martian Outpost G. James, Ph.D. G. Chamitoff, Ph.D. D. Barker, M.S., M.A. April 1998 The NASA STI Program Office... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and the advancement of aeronautics and space technical findings by NASA-sponsored science. The NASA Scientific and Technical contractors and grantees. Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part in helping NASA maintain this important CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected role. papers from scientific and technical confer- ences, symposia, seminars, or other meetings The NASA STI Program Office is operated by sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. Langley Research Center, the lead center for NASA's scientific and technical information. SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program Office provides access technical, or historical information from to the NASA STI Database, the largest NASA programs, projects, and mission, often collection of aeronautical and space science STI concerned with subjects having substantial in the word. The Program Office is also public interest. NASA's institutional mechanism for disseminating the results of its research and • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. development activities. These results are English-language translations of foreign scientific published by NASA in the NASA STI Report and technical material pertinent to NASA's Series, which includes the following report mission. types: Specialized services that complement the STI TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of Program Office's diverse offerings include completed research or a major significant creating custom thesauri, building customized phase of research that present the results of databases, organizing and publishing research NASA programs and include extensive results.., even providing videos.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity and Space Design and Implementation of a Theoretical Martian Outpost
    Project Number: MH-1605 Humanity and Space Design and implementation of a theoretical Martian outpost An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Degree of Bachelor Science By Kenneth Fong Andrew Kelly Owen McGrath Kenneth Quartuccio Matej Zampach Abstract Over the next century, humanity will be faced with the challenge of journeying to and inhabiting the solar system. This endeavor carries many complications not yet addressed such as shielding from radiation, generating power, obtaining water, creating oxygen, and cultivating food. Still, practical solutions can be implemented and missions accomplished utilizing futuristic technology. With resources transported from Earth or gathered from Space, a semi-permanent facility can realistically be established on Mars. 2 Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 3 2.1 Kenneth Fong . .4 2.2 Andrew Kelly . .6 2.3 Owen McGrath . .7 2.4 Kenneth Quartuccio . .8 2.5 Matej Zampach . .9 3 Research 10 3.1 Current Space Policy . 11 3.1.1 US Space Policy . 11 3.1.2 Russian Space Policy . 12 3.1.3 Chinese Space Policy . 12 3.2 Propulsion Methods . 14 3.2.1 Launch Loops . 14 3.2.2 Solar Sails . 17 3.2.3 Ionic Propulsion . 19 3.2.4 Space Elevator . 20 i 3.2.5 Chemical Propulsion . 21 3.3 Colonization . 24 3.3.1 Farming . 24 3.3.2 Sustainable Habitats . 25 3.3.3 Sustainability . 27 3.3.4 Social Issues . 28 3.3.5 Terraforming . 29 3.3.6 Harvesting Water from Mars .
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Miners-Manifesto-Mars.Pdf
    http://www.moonsociety.org/mars/ Let’s make the right choice - Mars and the Moon! Advantages of a low profile for shielding Mars looks like Arizona but feels like Antarctica Rover Opportunity at edge of Endeavor Crater Designing railroads and trains for Mars Designing planes that can fly in Mars’ thin air Breeding plants to be “Mars-hardy” Outposts between dunes, pulling sand over them These are just a few of the Mars-related topics covered in the past 25+ years. Read on for much more! Why Mars? The lunar and Martian frontiers will thrive much better as trading partners than either could on it own. Mars has little to trade to Earth, but a lot it can trade with the Moon. Both can/will thrive together! CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX MMM THEMES: MARS MMM #6 - "M" is for Missing Volatiles: Methane and 'Mmonia; Mars, PHOBOS, Deimos; Mars as I see it; MMM #16 Frontiers Have Rough Edges MMM #18 Importance of the M.U.S.-c.l.e.Plan for the Opening of Mars; Pavonis Mons MMM #19 Seizing the Reins of the Mars Bandwagon; Mars: Option to Stay; Mars Calendar MMM #30 NIMF: Nuclear rocket using Indigenous Martian Fuel; Wanted: Split personality types for Mars Expedition; Mars Calendar Postscript; Are there Meteor Showers on Mars? MMM #41 Imagineering Mars Rovers; Rethink Mars Sample Return; Lunar Development & Mars; Temptations to Eco-carelessness; The Romantic Touch of Old Barsoom MMM #42 Igloos: Atmosphere-derived shielding for lo-rem Martian Shelters MMM #54 Mars of Lore vs. Mars of Yore; vendors wanted for wheeled and walking Mars Rovers; Transforming Mars; Xities
    [Show full text]
  • INTEGRATED SPACE PLAN (Preliminary)
    CRITICAL PATH AMERICAN SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM INTEGRATED SPACE PLAN Space Transportation (NSTS) Systems Division FIRST INTERNATIONAL RMS GENERATION EXPENDABLE LAUNCH (INTERNATIONAL) OF VEHICLE FLEET (Preliminary) IUS UNITED STATES LAUNCH VEHICLE CAPABILITES REUSABLE SPACECRAFT PRIVATE LAUNCH VERSION 1.1 FEBRUARY, 1989 VEHICLE # TO LEO # TO GEO GEO-CIRCULAR FIRST FLIGHT VEHICLES ALS 200,000 1998 * THE AMERICAN SPACE SHUTTLE (ELV’S) EMU SHUTTLE C 150,000 20,000 (CENTAUR) 1994 1983 PRODUCED BY RONALD M. JONES D/385-210 SPACE 55,000 5,500 (IUS) 1981 1983 * CHALLENGER OV-099 SHUTTLE 6,500 (TOS) * COLUMBIA OV-102 ABOUT THIS DIAGRAM: TITAN 4 40,000 12,500 10,000 (CENTAUR) 1989 OV-103 * DISCOVERY GOVERNMENT - The Rockwell Integrated Space Plan (ISP) is a very long range systematic perspective of America’s and the TITAN 3 33,000 8,600 4,200 (IUS) 1965 MMU * ATLANTIS OV-104 COMMERCIAL SATELLITE Western World’s space program. Its 100-plus-year vision was created from the integration of numerous NASA ATLAS 2 14,400 5,200 2,500 1991 EARTH-TO-ORBIT * TBD OV-105 DEPLOYMENT long-range studies including the project Pathfinder case studies, recommendations from the National ATLAS 1 12,300 1959 AND IN-SPACE Commission on Space’s report to the President, the Ride report to the NASA Administrator, and the new DELTA 2 11,100 3,190 1,350 (PAM-D) 1988 SATELLITE RETRIEVAL * THE SOVIET SPACE SHUTTLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS National Space Policy Directive. Special initiatives such as the four Pathfinder scenarios or those described in DELTA 7,800 1960 AND SERVICING * BURAN the Ride Report (i.e., Mission To Planet Earth, Exploration of the Solar System, Outpost on the Moon, and TITAN 2 5,500 1965 DEFENSE SATELLITES Humans to Mars) are integral parts of the ISP.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight: Phobos Base
    2017 AIAA Student Design Competition HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT: PHOBOS BASE Timothy Bishop Victor Kitmanyen Thomas Lagarde Zachary Taylor Faculty Advisor: Olga Bannova, Ph.D. Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA) Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston Houston, Texas, USA ~ 2 ~ Copyright © 2017 by Timothy Bishop, Victor Kitmanyen, Thomas Lagarde & Zachary Taylor. All Rights Reserved. Published with express permission, by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. ~ 3 ~ Signature Page Timothy Bishop Project Manager AIAA #: 677333 Victor Kitmanyen Microgravity Countermeasures Architect AIAA #: 819885 Zachary Taylor Space Architect AIAA #: 819283 Thomas Lagarde RECLSS Architect AIAA #: 819864 Dr. Olga Bannova Faculty & Project Advisor Copyright © 2017 by Timothy Bishop, Victor Kitmanyen, Thomas Lagarde & Zachary Taylor. All Rights Reserved. Published with express permission, by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. ~ 4 ~ Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ___________________________________________________________________________ 6 ACRONYMS _________________________________________________________________________________ 8 1.0 ABSTRACT _______________________________________________________________________________ 9 2.0 PROJECT INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________________ 10 3.0 REQUIREMENTS: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION ____________________________________ 11 3.1 SITE ___________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Facts: Analog Missions & Field Tests
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Analog Missions and Field Tests NASA is actively planning for its return to analogs, which proved to be an effective the moon by 2020. The agency’s Exploration method for developing extravehicular activities Systems Mission Directorate is developing the (EVAs), surface transportation and geophysics architecture that will transport astronaut crews capabilities. to and from the moon and sustain a human presence there. NASA engineers and scientists, In preparation for upcoming lunar missions, government agencies and industry partners NASA is expanding its analog mission campaign have united to gather requirements and develop and will include international participation in the technologies necessary to ensure initial future missions. Today, analogs are conducted and continuing success for life and work on the to test robotics, vehicles, habitats, and in-situ moon. resource utilization in realistic environments that facts will aid astronauts, engineers, and scientists Because NASA’s field centers do not feature as they define ways to combine human and terrain comparable to that of the lunar surface, robotic efforts to enhance scientific exploration. NASA and its affiliates conduct analog missions. Analogs are remote field activities that map Multiple sites that replicate the lunar environment and integrate multiple features of a target have been added to those explored in the past. mission to gain an understanding of system-level The combination of the new technology and test interactions. Analog locations are identified sites has enhanced the experiments conducted based on their similarities to one or more at the sites and continues to provide NASA extreme characteristics of the target mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of 21St Century Space Travel
    O RIGINS of ORIGINS of 21st-Century Space Travel ASNER A History of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for & GARBER Space Exploration, 1999–2004 Glen R. Asner Stephen J. Garber ORIGINS of 21st-Century Space Travel A History of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for Space Exploration, 1999–2004 The Columbia Space Shuttle accident on 1 February 2003 presented the George W. Bush administration with difficult choices. Could NASA safely resume Shuttle flights to the International Space Station? If so, for how long? With two highly visible Shuttle trag- edies and only three operational vehicles remaining, administration officials concluded on the day of the accident that major decisions about the space pro- gram could be delayed no longer. NASA had been supporting studies and honing plans for several years in preparation for an opportu- nity to propose a new mission for the space program. As early as April 1999, NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin had established the Decadal Planning Team (DPT) to provide a forum for future Agency leaders to begin considering goals more ambitious than send- ing humans on missions to near-Earth destinations and robotic spacecraft to far-off destinations, with no relation between the two. Goldin charged DPT with devising a long-term strategy that would inte- grate the entire range of the Agency’s capabilities, in science and engineering, robotic and human space- flight, to reach destinations beyond low-Earth orbit. When the Bush administration initiated inter- agency discussions in 2003 to consider a new spaceflight strategy, NASA was prepared with tech- nical and policy options, as well as a team of individ- uals who had spent years preparing for the moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Wars the Rise and Fall of the Space Exploration Initiative
    Mars Wars The Rise and Fall of the Space Exploration Initiative Thor Hogan The NASA History Series National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Office of External Relations Washington, DC May 2007 NASA SP-2007-4410 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hogan, Thor. Mars wars : the rise and fall of the Space Exploration Initiative / Thor Hogan. p. cm. -- (The NASA history series) (NASA SP-2007-4410) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space Exploration Initiative (U.S.) 2. Space flight to Mars--Planning--History--20th century. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration--Management--History--20th century. 4. Astronautics and state--United States--History--20th century. 5. United States--Politics and government--1989-1993. 6. Outerspace--Exploration--United States--History--20th century. 7. Organizational change--United States--History--20th century. I. Title. TL789.8.U6S62 2007 629.45’530973--dc22 2007008987 Table of Contents Acknowledgements. iii Chapter 1: Introduction. 1 The Policy Stream and Punctuated Equilibrium Models. 2 Why Mars?. 5 Canals on Mars. 7 Mars in Popular Culture. 9 Mariner and Viking . 11 Chapter 2: The Origins of SEI . 15 Early Mission Planning . 16 Post-Apollo Planning. 21 Case for Mars. 25 National Commission on Space. 27 The Ride Report . 30 President Reagan and NASA’s Office of Exploration. 32 Chapter 3: Bush, Quayle, and SEI. 37 Bush-Quayle 1988. 39 Reagan-Bush Transition. 44 The Problem Stream: Providing Direction to a Directionless Agency. 47 The Policy Stream: The Ad Hoc Working Group. 57 The Political Stream: Briefing Key Actors. 64 Joining the Streams: Human Exploration of Mars Reaches the Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • How Technologies Shaped Beyond-Low-Earth-Orbit Exploration Roadmaps
    How Technologies Shaped Beyond-Low-Earth-Orbit Exploration Roadmaps Stuart M. Feldman, Erica A. Hampton, Keithe E. Baggett, Jason P. Hundley, and Karin A. Feldman Zero Point Frontiers Corp, Huntsville, AL, 35801 This paper provides an overview of key technologies for beyond-LEO human spaceflight for two different space exploration roadmaps: NASA’s Roadmap for Solar System Exploration (1970-1990) and Rockwell’s Integrated Space Plan (ISP) (1989-2100). Both plans were generated at dynamic points in U.S. space exploration history: the first developed in the midst of a successful Apollo lunar landing program, and the second during the first decade of the Space Shuttle program. The policies, research and development, technologies, funding and support of each era impacted each plan’s development and focus on technologies. The NASA Roadmap is technology-driving and outlines a specific plan for Martian exploration that uses technologies developed specifically for the leading missions. The ISP is technology-driven and provided a gradual plan for solar system exploration, implementing technologies as they are developed and defining new missions to make use of those technologies. This paper will discuss how existing technology development efforts and assumptions about future technologies shaped each roadmap. Six key technology areas have been identified: artificial gravity, environmental control and life support systems, radiation shielding, in space resource utilization, Earth-to-orbit propulsion, and beyond-LEO propulsion. How the current and planned developments in each of these areas influenced the design of the roadmaps and how those technologies shaped the proposed development of key infrastructure assets (space stations, launch vehicles, and surface bases) will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Human Spaceflight Past, Present, and Future: Where Do We Go from Here?
    NASA HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 Serial No. 112–038 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 68–319PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. RALPH M. HALL, Texas, Chair F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas Wisconsin JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland BRAD MILLER, North Carolina FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona W. TODD AKIN, Missouri DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia PAUL D. TONKO, New York SANDY ADAMS, Florida JERRY MCNERNEY, California BENJAMIN QUAYLE, Arizona JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland CHARLES J. ‘‘CHUCK’’ FLEISCHMANN, TERRI A. SEWELL, Alabama Tennessee FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi VACANCY MO BROOKS, Alabama ANDY HARRIS, Maryland RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana DAN BENISHEK, Michigan VACANCY (II) CONTENTS Thursday, September 22, 2011 Page Witness List ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]