DOCSLIB.ORG

Mars Wars the Rise and Fall of the Space Exploration Initiative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mars Wars the Rise and Fall of the Space Exploration Initiative Mars Wars The Rise and Fall of the Space Exploration Initiative Thor Hogan The NASA History Series National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Office of External Relations Washington, DC May 2007 NASA SP-2007-4410 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hogan, Thor. Mars wars : the rise and fall of the Space Exploration Initiative / Thor Hogan. p. cm. -- (The NASA history series) (NASA SP-2007-4410) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space Exploration Initiative (U.S.) 2. Space flight to Mars--Planning--History--20th century. 3. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration--Management--History--20th century. 4. Astronautics and state--United States--History--20th century. 5. United States--Politics and government--1989-1993. 6. Outerspace--Exploration--United States--History--20th century. 7. Organizational change--United States--History--20th century. I. Title. TL789.8.U6S62 2007 629.45’530973--dc22 2007008987 Table of Contents Acknowledgements. iii Chapter 1: Introduction. 1 The Policy Stream and Punctuated Equilibrium Models. 2 Why Mars?. 5 Canals on Mars. 7 Mars in Popular Culture. 9 Mariner and Viking . 11 Chapter 2: The Origins of SEI . 15 Early Mission Planning . 16 Post-Apollo Planning. 21 Case for Mars. 25 National Commission on Space. 27 The Ride Report . 30 President Reagan and NASA’s Office of Exploration. 32 Chapter 3: Bush, Quayle, and SEI. 37 Bush-Quayle 1988. 39 Reagan-Bush Transition. 44 The Problem Stream: Providing Direction to a Directionless Agency. 47 The Policy Stream: The Ad Hoc Working Group. 57 The Political Stream: Briefing Key Actors. 64 Joining the Streams: Human Exploration of Mars Reaches the Gov. Agenda . 68 Chapter 4: The 90-Day Study. 77 Waiting for NASA. 82 SEI Takes Shape. 85 Mars Wars . 92 Chapter 5: The Battle to Save SEI. 107 Presidential Decisions. 108 SEI Hits the Road . 114 Losing Faith in NASA . 120 The Augustine and Synthesis Group Reports. 125 SEI Fades Away . 130 Chapter 6: SEI, Policy Streams, and Punctuated Equilibrium. 137 Policy Streams, SEI, and the Space Policy Community. 138 Punctuated Equilibrium, Space Policy, and SEI . 143 Chapter 7: The Lessons of SEI . 159 NASA History Series. 167 Index. 178 Acknowledgements A great many people provided me with assistance during the preparation of this book. I am particularly indebted to John Logsdon and Roger Launius for their invaluable insights regarding the history of the American space program, the role of various actors within the space policy community, and the context in which Mars exploration should be viewed. I also owe a great deal to Steve Balla and Jeff Henig, who helped me employ the political science and public policy theories that are used in this book. I would also like to thank Ray Williamson and Joe Cordes for their support and helpful comments. I am also very grateful for all the hard work contributed by Steve Dick and Steve Garber getting this book ready for publica- tion. I would like to thank Heidi Pongratz at Maryland Composition, Angela Lane and Danny Nowlin at Stennis Space Center, and Jeffrey McLean at NASA Head- quarters for handling the copyediting, layout, and printing of the book. Finally, I would like to thank the dedicated archivists at both the NASA History Divi- sion in Washington, D.C. and the George Bush Presidential Library at Texas A&M – they were all crucial to the successful completion of this project. In particular, I would like to thank Colin Fries and Jane Odom at the NASA History Division and Debbie Carter, Bob Holzweiss, John Laster, Laura Spencer, and Melissa Walker at the George Bush Presidential Library. This book is dedicated to Joe Hogan, for teaching me how to dream big dreams; to Ron Beck, for believing in my potential when few others did; and to Kate Kuva- lanka, for inspiring me on a daily basis iii 1 Introduction “Why Mars? Because it is humanity’s destiny to strive, to seek, to find. And because it is America’s destiny to lead.” President George Bush, 20 July 19891 Sitting on the steps of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum on 20 July 2004, it was difficult to imagine that fifteen years earlier at this place the fiercest domestic political conflict of the first space age commenced. Bright-eyed children poured off tour buses and hurried to examine the museum’s wonders, teachers and parents close behind with digital cameras ready. They lined up to touch a four billion year-old lunar rock, clamored around the Apollo 11 Com- mand Module Columbia, and gazed up at an ungainly Lunar Module— monuments to past American triumphs in space. It was on a similarly hot and muggy Washing- ton morning that President George Bush had used this location to announce a renewed commitment to human exploration beyond Earth orbit. Even before this declaration, however, the winds of war had been swirling in the nation’s capital. On the 20th anniversary of the first human landing on the Moon, President Bush had stood atop these very steps and proposed a long-range exploration plan that included the successful construction of an orbital space station, a permanent return to the Moon, and a human mission to Mars—this enterprise became known as the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). The president charged the newly rees- tablished National Space Council with providing concrete alternatives for meeting these objectives. To provide overall focus for the new initiative, Bush later set a 30- year goal for a crewed landing on Mars. If met, humans would be walking on the red 1 Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, 20 July 1989, Remarks on the 20th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon Landing [http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/papers/] (accessed 18 May 2002). 1 Mars Wars Chapter 1: Introduction planet by 2019, which would be the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 lunar land- the government agenda and what factors led to its ultimate demise. John Kingdon’s ing. Within a few short years after President Bush’s Kennedyesque announcement, Policy Streams Model describes how problems come to the attention of policy makers, however, the initiative had faded into history—the victim of a flawed policy process how agendas are set, how policy alternatives are generated, and why policy windows and a political war fought on several different fronts. The failure of SEI, combined open.3 This theory will be utilized to develop the story of SEI’s rise and fall, and will with problems ranging from the Hubble Space Telescope’s flawed mirror to space more specifically be used to assess who the important actors are within the space shuttle fuel leaks to space station budget problems, badly damaged the National policy community. Frank Baumgartner and Bryan Jones’s Punctuated Equilibrium Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) image and prompted dramatic Model depicts the policy process as comprising long periods of stability, which are changes in the American space program. interrupted by predictable periods of instability that lead to major policy changes.4 The rise of SEI and its eventual demise represents one of the landmark episodes This model will be utilized to provide a better understanding of the larger trends in the history of the American space program—ranking with the creation of NASA, that led to SEI’s promotion to the government agenda and may explain its eventual the decision to go to the Moon, the post-Apollo planning process, and the space downfall.5 These two models contributed a number of descriptive statistics that station decision. The story of this failed initiative is one shaped by key protagonists were used to develop a collection of lessons learned from the SEI experience. and critical battles. It is a tale of organizational, cultural, and personal confron- In 1972, Michael Cohen, James March, and Johan Olsen introduced Garbage tation. Organizational skirmishes involved the Space Council versus NASA, the Can Theory in an article describing what they called “organized anarchies.” The White House versus congressional appropriators, and the Johnson Space Center authors emphasized the chaotic character of organizations as loose collections of versus the rest of the space agency—all seeking control of the national space policy ideas as opposed to rational, coherent structures. They found that each, organized process. Cultural struggles pitted the increasingly conservative engineering ethos of anarchy was composed of four separate process streams: problems, solutions, partici- NASA against the “faster, better, cheaper” philosophy of a Space Council looking pants, and choice opportunities. They concluded that organizations are “a collection for innovative solutions to technical problems. Personality clashes matched Vice of choices looking for problems, issues and feelings looking for decision situations in President Dan Quayle and Space Council Executive Secretary Mark Albrecht against NASA Administrator Dick Truly and Johnson Space Center Director Aaron Cohen. which they might be aired, solutions looking for issues to which they might be the In the final analysis, the demise of SEI was a classic example of a defective deci- answer, and decision makers looking for work.” Finally, a choice opportunity was: sion-making process—one that lacked adequate high-level policy guidance, failed to address critical fiscal constraints, developed inadequate programmatic alternatives, …a garbage can into which various kinds of problems and solutions and garnered no congressional support. Some space policy experts have argued that are dumped by participants as they are generated. The mix of garbage in SEI was doomed to fail, due primarily to the immense budgetary pressures facing a single can depends on the mix of cans available, on the labels attached to the nation during the early 1990s.2 This book will argue, however, that the failure the alternative cans, on what garbage is currently being produced, and on of the initiative was not predetermined; instead, it was the result of a deeply flawed the speed with which garbage is collected and removed from the scene.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Space Exploration Strategy Group International Space Exploration
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP ADVANCING THE EXPLORATION FRONTIER For the last forty years, human In recent years multiple reports define exploration in the coming space exploration has made have recommended international decades. significant progress through partners come together for The group will bring together the international collaboration. The strategic planning activities. interests of all human spaceflight Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and However, many national partners, rather than national Shuttle-Mir Programs marked government planning activities interests subject to changing the end of the Space Race, are severely limited in their political influences. and advanced long duration consideration of international This project provides a unique spaceflight. The International partners. Furthermore, opportunity for current and Space Station (ISS) is now in its government and industry recent graduate student second decade as a continuously planners may not have access researchers to collaborate with occupied human outpost in Low- to the latest technologies being others from around the world. Earth Orbit (LEO). While we developed at leading research Most importantly, participants expect productive utilization of institutions around the world. will have the opportunity to ISS through at least 2020, there We believe an international influence the government and is currently no internationally graduate student working group industry decision makers that recognized program for human is well-suited to generate and define future human exploration exploration beyond LEO. communicate the ideas that will strategy. 3 INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP LEADERSHIP Edward Crawley is President of the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech).
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate
    PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 AND 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Committee: Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Dr. John Makay Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Ron E. Shields Dr. Don McQuarie © 2007 Bradley C. Klypchak All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Between 1984 and 1991, heavy metal became one of the most publicly popular and commercially successful rock music subgenres. The focus of this dissertation is to explore the following research questions: How did the subculture of heavy metal music between 1984 and 1991 evolve and what meanings can be derived from this ongoing process? How did the contextual circumstances surrounding heavy metal music during this period impact the performative choices exhibited by artists, and from a position of retrospection, what lasting significance does this particular era of heavy metal merit today? A textual analysis of metal- related materials fostered the development of themes relating to the selective choices made and performances enacted by metal artists. These themes were then considered in terms of gender, sexuality, race, and age constructions as well as the ongoing negotiations of the metal artist within multiple performative realms. Occurring at the juncture of art and commerce, heavy metal music is a purposeful construction. Metal musicians made performative choices for serving particular aims, be it fame, wealth, or art. These same individuals worked within a greater system of influence. Metal bands were the contracted employees of record labels whose own corporate aims needed to be recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE for RESEARCH in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
    2015 Annual Report COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2015 annual report University of Colorado Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado Boulder 216 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0216 303-492-1143 [email protected] http://cires.colorado.edu CIRES Director Waleed Abdalati Annual Report Staff Katy Human, Director of Communications, Editor Susan Lynds and Karin Vergoth, Editing Robin L. Strelow, Designer Agreement No. NA12OAR4320137 Cover photo: Mt. Cook in the Southern Alps, West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island Birgit Hassler, CIRES/NOAA table of contents Executive summary & research highlights 2 project reports 82 From the Director 2 Air Quality in a Changing Climate 83 CIRES: Science in Service to Society 3 Climate Forcing, Feedbacks, and Analysis 86 This is CIRES 6 Earth System Dynamics, Variability, and Change 94 Organization 7 Management and Exploitation of Geophysical Data 105 Council of Fellows 8 Regional Sciences and Applications 115 Governance 9 Scientific Outreach and Education 117 Finance 10 Space Weather Understanding and Prediction 120 Active NOAA Awards 11 Stratospheric Processes and Trends 124 Systems and Prediction Models Development 129 People & Programs 14 CIRES Starts with People 14 Appendices 136 Fellows 15 Table of Contents 136 CIRES Centers 50 Publications by the Numbers 136 Center for Limnology 50 Publications 137 Center for Science and Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Phobos, Deimos: Formation and Evolution Alex Soumbatov-Gur
    Phobos, Deimos: Formation and Evolution Alex Soumbatov-Gur To cite this version: Alex Soumbatov-Gur. Phobos, Deimos: Formation and Evolution. [Research Report] Karpov institute of physical chemistry. 2019. hal-02147461 HAL Id: hal-02147461 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02147461 Submitted on 4 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Phobos, Deimos: Formation and Evolution Alex Soumbatov-Gur The moons are confirmed to be ejected parts of Mars’ crust. After explosive throwing out as cone-like rocks they plastically evolved with density decays and materials transformations. Their expansion evolutions were accompanied by global ruptures and small scale rock ejections with concurrent crater formations. The scenario reconciles orbital and physical parameters of the moons. It coherently explains dozens of their properties including spectra, appearances, size differences, crater locations, fracture symmetries, orbits, evolution trends, geologic activity, Phobos’ grooves, mechanism of their origin, etc. The ejective approach is also discussed in the context of observational data on near-Earth asteroids, main belt asteroids Steins, Vesta, and Mars. The approach incorporates known fission mechanism of formation of miniature asteroids, logically accounts for its outliers, and naturally explains formations of small celestial bodies of various sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C
    Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Scenario-Based Visioning: Logisitical Optimization of Transportation Architectures
    MARS SCENARIO-BASED VISIONING: LOGISITICAL OPTIMIZATION OF TRANSPORTATION ARCHITECTURES GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Contributors: Ashraf Charania Kris Cowart Brad St. Germain Tadashi Sakai Roberto Salinas Kirk Sorensen Jeffrey Tooley Shannan Wilson Advisor: Dr. John R. Olds Assistant Professor, School of Aerospace Engineering Director, Space Systems Design Lab (SSDL) Georgia Institute of Technology ABSTRACT The purpose of this conceptual design investigation is to examine transportation forecasts for future human missions to Mars. Scenario-Based Visioning is used to generate possible future demand projections. These scenarios are then coupled with availability, cost, and capacity parameters for indigenously designed Mars Transfer Vehicles (solar electric, nuclear thermal, and chemical propulsion types) and Earth-to-Orbit launch vehicles (current, future, and indigenous) to provide a cost-conscious dual-phase launch manifest to meet such future demand. A simulator named M-SAT (Mars Scenario Analysis Tool) is developed using this method. This simulation is used to examine three specific transportation scenarios to Mars: a limited "flags and footprints" mission, a more ambitious scientific expedition similar to an expanded version of the Design Reference Mission from NASA, and a long-term colonization scenario. Initial results from the simulation indicate that chemical propulsion systems might be the architecture of choice for all three scenarios. With this mind, "what if" analyses were performed which indicated that if nuclear production costs were reduced by 30% for the colonization scenario, then the nuclear architecture would have a lower life cycle cost than the chemical. Results indicate that the most cost-effective solution to the Mars transportation problem is to plan for segmented development, this involves development of one vehicle at one opportunity and derivatives of that vehicle at subsequent opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mobile Smoking Cessation Intervention for Mexico (Vive Sin Tabaco
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior 10-11-2018 A Mobile Smoking Cessation Intervention for Mexico (Vive sin Tabaco... ¡Decídete!): Single-Arm Pilot Study Ana Paula Cupertino Francisco Cartujano-Barrera Mariana Ramírez Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños James F. Thrasher See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ sph_health_promotion_education_behavior_facpub Part of the Public Health Education and Promotion Commons Author(s) Ana Paula Cupertino, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, Mariana Ramírez, Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños, James F. Thrasher, Gloria Pérez-Rubio, Ramcés Falfán-Valencia, Edward F. Ellerbeck, and Luz Myriam Reynales- Shigematsu JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH Cupertino et al Original Paper A Mobile Smoking Cessation Intervention for Mexico (Vive sin Tabaco... ¡Decídete!): Single-Arm Pilot Study Ana Paula Cupertino1, PhD; Francisco Cartujano-Barrera1, MD; Mariana Ramírez2, LSMW; Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños3, PhD; James F Thrasher4, PhD; Gloria Pérez-Rubio5, PhD; Ramcés Falfán-Valencia5, PhD; Edward F Ellerbeck2, MD, MPH; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu3, PhD 1Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States 2Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States 3Department of Tobacco Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico 4Department of Health Promotion, Education
    [Show full text]
  • WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8Th THURSDAY, AUGUST 9Th SUNDAY, AUGUST 12Th FRIDAY, AUGUST 10Th SATURDAY, AUGUST 11Th
    WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8th Main Stage hosted by: Sugar Slam and Chop 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM 12Mid 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM Kool George Main Stage Keith Static X Onyx Clinton Dark Lotus Hog Daddy's Hell Fire Mass Bobby Poe Liquid Psychopathic Underground Stage O-Villainz Murderaz Ryan Ho Kesto Sick Sedated 10/31 Whosaine Assassin AJAX Freddy Grimes Mastamind Rydas Bomb-House Lingerie Contest Dj Clay’s Juggalo Jump O! Wrestling Stage JCW Try Outs JCW Live! Seminar Tent Ralphie May Psychopathic Radio Psychopathic Radio Menace II Swollen Freakshow Stage Karaoke Contest Wet T-Shirt Comp Sobriety (hed) pe Slaine Members Merchandise starts 12 Noon Get merchandise from your favorite Psychopathic Records artists THURSDAY, AUGUST 9th Main Stage hosted by: Jumpsteady 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM 12Mid 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM Danny Main Stage Brown Fear Factory The Game DMX ABK Hog Daddy's Hell Fire Ruthless Dopesic Flagrant Kayla K Nukie Jimi Stranger J Dirty Smokehouse Doe Bukshot AMB Potluck Underground Stage Unda Ground The Carpathio Kanklez Haze Cognito Junkiez Dubbla Miss Juggalette Steel Cage Rap Battle Competition Violent J’s West Side Party Bomb-House Hosted By Awesome Dre & Doe Dubbla Glasses Malone, Lil Eazy E, The Pharcyde, Warren G Wrestling Stage JCW Try Outs Ladies of Wrestling Blaze ABK Jamie Cheech & Seminar Tent Kennedy Chong Psychopathic Radio Psychopathic Radio Critical So Sick Freakshow Stage Sideshow Magician Souly Bill Social Club Mushroomhead Autograph Tent Dj Clay Blaze Ya Dead Homie Twiztid
    [Show full text]
  • Mars, Phobos, and Deimos Sample Return Enabled by ARRM Alternative Trade Study Spacecraft
    Mars, Phobos, and Deimos Sample Return Enabled by ARRM Alternative Trade Study Spacecraft Jacob A. Englander,∗ Matthew A. Vavrina,† Bo Naasz ,‡ Raymond G. Merill,MinQu§ ¶ The Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission (ARRM) has been the topic of many mission design studies since 2011.1 The reference ARRM spacecraft uses a powerful solar electric propulsion (SEP) system and a bag device to capture a small asteroid from an Earth-like orbit and redirect it to a distant retrograde orbit (DRO) around the moon. The ARRM Option B spacecraft uses the same propulsion system and multi-Degree of Freedom (DoF) manipulators device to retrieve a very large sample (thousands of kilograms) from a 100+ meter diameter farther-away Near Earth Asteroid (NEA). This study will demonstrate that the ARRM Option B spacecraft design can also be used to return samples from Mars and its moons - either by acquiring a large rock from the surface of Phobos or Deimos, and/or by rendezvousing with a sample-return spacecraft launched from the surface of Mars. I. Introduction The Asteroid Robotic Redirect Mission (ARRM) Option A concept, first introduced in 2011,1 is a mission design to capture and return a small near-Earth asteroid (NEA) to cislunar space. The ARRM Option B concept is a similar spacecraft, but designed to return a very large sample from a more difficult to reach NEA.2 In this work we show that the spacecraft designed for ARRM Option B is also well-suited to sample return from Mars and its moons. This work presents low-thrust interplanetary trajectories from cislunar space to Mars and back, including descent from the Martian sphere of influence (SOI) to the desired orbit altitude and ascent to the SOI after the sample retrieval is complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the AES Candidates
    Rep ort on the AES Candidates 1 2 1 3 Olivier Baudron , Henri Gilb ert , Louis Granb oulan , Helena Handschuh , 4 1 5 1 Antoine Joux , Phong Nguyen ,Fabrice Noilhan ,David Pointcheval , 1 1 1 1 Thomas Pornin , Guillaume Poupard , Jacques Stern , and Serge Vaudenay 1 Ecole Normale Sup erieure { CNRS 2 France Telecom 3 Gemplus { ENST 4 SCSSI 5 Universit e d'Orsay { LRI Contact e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This do cument rep orts the activities of the AES working group organized at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. Several candidates are evaluated. In particular we outline some weaknesses in the designs of some candidates. We mainly discuss selection criteria b etween the can- didates, and make case-by-case comments. We nally recommend the selection of Mars, RC6, Serp ent, ... and DFC. As the rep ort is b eing nalized, we also added some new preliminary cryptanalysis on RC6 and Crypton in the App endix which are not considered in the main b o dy of the rep ort. Designing the encryption standard of the rst twentyyears of the twenty rst century is a challenging task: we need to predict p ossible future technologies, and wehavetotake unknown future attacks in account. Following the AES pro cess initiated by NIST, we organized an op en working group at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. This group met two hours a week to review the AES candidates. The present do cument rep orts its results. Another task of this group was to up date the DFC candidate submitted by CNRS [16, 17] and to answer questions which had b een omitted in previous 1 rep orts on DFC.
    [Show full text]
  • CYTECH Programme Grande École Ingénieur VF.Indd
    GRANDE ÉCOLE DE SCIENCES, D’INGÉNIERIE, D’ÉCONOMIE ET DE GESTION Programme grande école 2021-2022 d’ingénieurs - CY Tech Une nouvelle façon le pouvoir d’agir de comprendre le monde sur demain ! ans un environnement aux mutations rapides et permanentes, CY Tech propose des formations Radjesvarane ALEXANDRE qui regardent le monde sous un Directeur de CY Tech ©Christian Jacquet jourD nouveau et pensent la pédagogie différemment afi n d’accompagner ces Quelle formation choisir changements, avec un objectif principal cole publique interne de CY Cergy Paris Université, CY Tech est la Grande École en : vous permettre de bâtir le projet quand 60 % des métiers sciences, ingénierie, économie, gestion et design, en phase avec les attentes du XXIe siècle professionnel qui vous ressemble et vous 4 grands des entreprises, des laboratoires de recherche et de développement et surtout avec mener vers un avenir prometteur qui façonneront l’avenir domaines Évos attentes à vous, futurs étudiants de CY Tech. et ouvert aux enjeux de demain. n’ont pas encore été • Mathématiques Appliquées, CY Tech opère sur tous les domaines majeurs du monde d’aujourd’hui et de demain : Data science, inventés ? transformation numérique, systèmes intelligents, cybersécurité, intelligence artifi cielle, réalité • Informatique, virtuelle, IoT, business intelligence, biotechnologie et chimie, génie civil, construction et matériaux, • Génie Civil, architecture, géosciences, design, économie, ingénierie fi nancière, management... • Biotechnologie et Chimie Forte d’une histoire de plus de 35 ans, CY Tech est une école publique, rendant accessible à toutes et à tous, des formations d’excellence et de pointe dans toutes les disciplines qu’elle propose.
    [Show full text]