Origins of 21St Century Space Travel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Origins of 21St Century Space Travel O RIGINS of ORIGINS of 21st-Century Space Travel ASNER A History of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for & GARBER Space Exploration, 1999–2004 Glen R. Asner Stephen J. Garber ORIGINS of 21st-Century Space Travel A History of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for Space Exploration, 1999–2004 The Columbia Space Shuttle accident on 1 February 2003 presented the George W. Bush administration with difficult choices. Could NASA safely resume Shuttle flights to the International Space Station? If so, for how long? With two highly visible Shuttle trag- edies and only three operational vehicles remaining, administration officials concluded on the day of the accident that major decisions about the space pro- gram could be delayed no longer. NASA had been supporting studies and honing plans for several years in preparation for an opportu- nity to propose a new mission for the space program. As early as April 1999, NASA Administrator Daniel Goldin had established the Decadal Planning Team (DPT) to provide a forum for future Agency leaders to begin considering goals more ambitious than send- ing humans on missions to near-Earth destinations and robotic spacecraft to far-off destinations, with no relation between the two. Goldin charged DPT with devising a long-term strategy that would inte- grate the entire range of the Agency’s capabilities, in science and engineering, robotic and human space- flight, to reach destinations beyond low-Earth orbit. When the Bush administration initiated inter- agency discussions in 2003 to consider a new spaceflight strategy, NASA was prepared with tech- nical and policy options, as well as a team of individ- uals who had spent years preparing for the moment. Although elements of the policy that President Bush announced at NASA Headquarters in January 2004, the Vision for Space Exploration (VSE), differed from the plans developed by DPT and its successor, the NASA Exploration Team (NEXT), the benefits of preparation were unmistakable. continued on back flap continued from front flap From the moment President Bush announced the VSE, NASA stood ready to implement it. Key decisions, such as setting a termination date for Shuttle flights and initiating the development of technologies for deep space exploration, heralded a paradigm shift, allowing both NASA and the U.S. space community to move beyond the infrastructure, technologies, and institutional arrangements that had sustained low-Earth orbit operations for more than two decades. This book provides a detailed his- torical account of the plans, debates, and decisions that opened the way for a new generation of space- flight at the start of the 21st century. ABOUT THE AUTHORS GLEN R. ASNER is the Deputy Chief Historian for the Historical Office, Office of th e Se cretary of Defense (OSD), and general editor of the five-volume series History of Acquisition in the Department of Defense. Prior to joining the OSD Historical Office in 2008, Dr. Asner worked as a historian in the NASA Headquarters History Office and as the Executive Secretary for the International Space Station Advisory Committee. He holds a master of science degree and a doctoral degree, both in history and policy, from Carnegie Mellon University, along with a bach- elor of arts degree in history from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He has written on the societal impact of spaceflight, the organization of indus- trial research in the United States, and the history of defense research and development (R&D) and acquisition policy. STEPHEN J. GARBER works in the NASA History Division at Headquarters. He has also served in the Pentagon’s space policy office, the Congressional Research Service, and NASA’s Office of Space Science. He has done research and writing on a vari- ety of history and policy issues related to civilian and national security space policy, such as orbital debris, NASA’s organizational culture, the design of the Space Shuttle, and the Soviet Buran Space Shuttle. He has a bachelor of arts degree in politics from Brandeis University, a master’s degree in public and interna- tional affairs from the University of Pittsburgh, and a master’s degree in science and technology studies from Virginia Tech. ORIGINS of 21st-Century Space Travel ORIGINSof 21st-Century Space Travel A History of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for Space Exploration, 1999–2004 Glen R. Asner Stephen J. Garber National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2019-4415 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Asner, Glen R., 1970– | Garber, Stephen J. Title: Origins of 21st-century space travel: a history of NASA’s Decadal Planning Team and the Vision for Space Exploration, 1999–2004 / by Glen R. Asner and Stephen J. Garber. Description: Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Communications, NASA History Division, [2018] | Series: NASA history series | Series: NASA SP ; 2019-4415 Identifiers: LCCN 2015008003 Subjects: LCSH: Astronautics and state—United States—History—21st cen- tury. | Astronautics—United States—History—21st century. | Outer space— Exploration—Planning—History—21st century. | United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Decadal Planning Team. Classification: LCC TL789.8.U5 A77 2018 | DDC 629.40973/090511—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2015008003 ABOUT THE COVER: The background image depicting astronomical phenomena is from iStockPhoto. The image of a spacecraft is an artist’s conception of the Orion capsule, designed to carry humans into deep space, which evolved from the 2004 Vision for Space Exploration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. ISBN 978-1-62683-046-2 90000 9 781626 830462 v CONTENTS Foreword by William H. Gerstenmaier vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Context and Background of Exploration Planning 9 3 “Sneaking up on Mars”: Origins of the Decadal Planning Team 39 4 Change in Leadership, Continuity in Ideas 83 5 The Columbia Accident and Its Aftermath 99 6 “Bold in Vision and Cheap in Expense” 125 7 Implementing the Vision for Space Exploration 169 8 Conclusion 189 APPENDIX A A Brief Note on Sources and Acknowledgments 199 APPENDIX B Biographical Appendix 203 APPENDIX C Chronology 213 APPENDIX D Key Documents 215 APPENDIX E NASA Organizational Restructuring 221 APPENDIX F Acronyms 225 The NASA History Series 227 Index 239 vii FOREWORD William H. Gerstenmaier NASA ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR HUMAN EXPLORATION AND OPERATIONS MISSION DIRECTORATE “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.” —Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1957 LONG-TERM PLANNING is difficult for any organization, but a government organi- zation has a special set of challenges it must deal with. Congress, which appro- priates funding and dictates priorities for executive branch agencies, operates on a one-year financial cycle and a two-year political rhythm. The President, to whom all federal executive agencies are directly accountable, changes adminis- trations once every four years, even when the President is reelected. It is against this backdrop that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) seeks to develop systems that may take 1, 2, or even 10 or 20 years to develop. The technologies of these systems are independent of political whims, but their engineers, program managers, and agency leaders are not. Even the five-year budget planning horizon favored by government analysts is merely half that of the National Academies’ Decadal Survey, which is a key input for any NASA science mission. When developing a mission, it is NASA’s challenge to manage not only the immutable laws of physics, but also the (at times) impenetrable laws of politics that are equally important. The scale of a flagship-class science mission or a human exploration mission simply is not commensurate with the way most gov- ernment agencies are organized to operate. And yet, for nearly 60 years, NASA has continued to expand the presence of humans in the solar system, both robotically and in person, to become more capable in space than ever before. One reason for NASA’s success has been the hard-won and hard-earned lessons of the past. Experience time and again proved that even the best-laid plans, whose technical and engineering rationale were beyond reproach, could become increasingly vulnerable to charges of inefficiencies and irrelevancies over time. In the realm of human spaceflight, whose ultimate horizon goal is to land humans on the surface of Mars, NASA has embraced a more flexible viii Origins of 21st-Century Space Travel approach than ever before, seeking to execute what is possible in the near term, plan for what is likely in the midterm, and aim for what is desired in the long term. In this way, the program can move forward through technical and politi- cal challenges without losing its core mission. Glen R. Asner and Stephen J. Garber’s new volume is a timely, well- documented, and provocative account of exactly how NASA has begun embrac- ing flexibility. The book looks at one series of mission planning efforts, in a specific technical and political context, starting with the NASA Decadal Planning Team (DPT) and culminating in the 2004 Vision for Space Exploration (VSE). Asner and Garber put NASA’s past mission planning efforts into context, look- ing at both the effect of a change in administration on mission planning and the poignant and tragic effects of replanning after the Columbia accident in 2003. This book focuses on the period between 1999 and 2004, showing how the 2004 VSE was substantially shaped by internal NASA planning efforts, and is in many ways a cautionary tale reminding current managers and future leaders not to become complacent in their planning assumptions. Asner and Garber’s book also reflects on what NASA has accomplished through building the International Space Station (ISS) with the help of the Space Shuttle.
Recommended publications
  • International Space Exploration Strategy Group International Space Exploration
    INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP ADVANCING THE EXPLORATION FRONTIER For the last forty years, human In recent years multiple reports define exploration in the coming space exploration has made have recommended international decades. significant progress through partners come together for The group will bring together the international collaboration. The strategic planning activities. interests of all human spaceflight Apollo-Soyuz Test Project and However, many national partners, rather than national Shuttle-Mir Programs marked government planning activities interests subject to changing the end of the Space Race, are severely limited in their political influences. and advanced long duration consideration of international This project provides a unique spaceflight. The International partners. Furthermore, opportunity for current and Space Station (ISS) is now in its government and industry recent graduate student second decade as a continuously planners may not have access researchers to collaborate with occupied human outpost in Low- to the latest technologies being others from around the world. Earth Orbit (LEO). While we developed at leading research Most importantly, participants expect productive utilization of institutions around the world. will have the opportunity to ISS through at least 2020, there We believe an international influence the government and is currently no internationally graduate student working group industry decision makers that recognized program for human is well-suited to generate and define future human exploration exploration beyond LEO. communicate the ideas that will strategy. 3 INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP INTERNATIONAL SPACE EXPLORATION. STRATEGY GROUP LEADERSHIP Edward Crawley is President of the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech).
    [Show full text]
  • Report Resumes
    REPORT RESUMES ED 019 218 88 SE 004 494 A RESOURCE BOOK OF AEROSPACE ACTIVITIES, K-6. LINCOLN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, NEBR. PUB DATE 67 EDRS PRICEMF.41.00 HC-S10.48 260P. DESCRIPTORS- *ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCIENCE, *PHYSICAL SCIENCES, *TEACHING GUIDES, *SECONDARY SCHOOL SCIENCE, *SCIENCE ACTIVITIES, ASTRONOMY, BIOGRAPHIES, BIBLIOGRAPHIES, FILMS, FILMSTRIPS, FIELD TRIPS, SCIENCE HISTORY, VOCABULARY, THIS RESOURCE BOOK OF ACTIVITIES WAS WRITTEN FOR TEACHERS OF GRADES K-6, TO HELP THEM INTEGRATE AEROSPACE SCIENCE WITH THE REGULAR LEARNING EXPERIENCES OF THE CLASSROOM. SUGGESTIONS ARE MADE FOR INTRODUCING AEROSPACE CONCEPTS INTO THE VARIOUS SUBJECT FIELDS SUCH AS LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL EDUCATION, SOCIAL STUDIES, AND OTHERS. SUBJECT CATEGORIES ARE (1) DEVELOPMENT OF FLIGHT, (2) PIONEERS OF THE AIR (BIOGRAPHY),(3) ARTIFICIAL SATELLITES AND SPACE PROBES,(4) MANNED SPACE FLIGHT,(5) THE VASTNESS OF SPACE, AND (6) FUTURE SPACE VENTURES. SUGGESTIONS ARE MADE THROUGHOUT FOR USING THE MATERIAL AND THEMES FOR DEVELOPING INTEREST IN THE REGULAR LEARNING EXPERIENCES BY INVOLVING STUDENTS IN AEROSPACE ACTIVITIES. INCLUDED ARE LISTS OF SOURCES OF INFORMATION SUCH AS (1) BOOKS,(2) PAMPHLETS, (3) FILMS,(4) FILMSTRIPS,(5) MAGAZINE ARTICLES,(6) CHARTS, AND (7) MODELS. GRADE LEVEL APPROPRIATENESS OF THESE MATERIALSIS INDICATED. (DH) 4:14.1,-) 1783 1490 ,r- 6e tt*.___.Vhf 1842 1869 LINCOLN PUBLICSCHOOLS A RESOURCEBOOK OF AEROSPACEACTIVITIES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION K-6) THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. 1919 O O Vj A PROJECT FUNDED UNDER TITLE HIELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT A RESOURCE BOOK OF AEROSPACE ACTIVITIES (K-6) The work presentedor reported herein was performed pursuant to a Grant from the U.
    [Show full text]
  • To All the Craft We've Known Before
    400,000 Visitors to Mars…and Counting Liftoff! A Fly’s-Eye View “Spacers”Are Doing it for Themselves September/October/November 2003 $4.95 to all the craft we’ve known before... 23rd International Space Development Conference ISDC 2004 “Settling the Space Frontier” Presented by the National Space Society May 27-31, 2004 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Location: Clarion Meridian Hotel & Convention Center 737 S. Meridian, Oklahoma City, OK 73108 (405) 942-8511 Room rate: $65 + tax, 1-4 people Planned Programming Tracks Include: Spaceport Issues Symposium • Space Education Symposium • “Space 101” Advanced Propulsion & Technology • Space Health & Biology • Commercial Space/Financing Space Space & National Defense • Frontier America & the Space Frontier • Solar System Resources Space Advocacy & Chapter Projects • Space Law and Policy Planned Tours include: Cosmosphere Space Museum, Hutchinson, KS (all day Thursday, May 27), with Max Ary Oklahoma Spaceport, courtesy of Oklahoma Space Industry Development Authority Oklahoma City National Memorial (Murrah Building bombing memorial) Omniplex Museum Complex (includes planetarium, space & science museums) Look for updates on line at www.nss.org or www.nsschapters.org starting in the fall of 2003. detach here ISDC 2004 Advance Registration Form Return this form with your payment to: National Space Society-ISDC 2004, 600 Pennsylvania Ave. S.E., Suite 201, Washington DC 20003 Adults: #______ x $______.___ Seniors/Students: #______ x $______.___ Voluntary contribution to help fund 2004 awards $______.___ Adult rates (one banquet included): $90 by 12/31/03; $125 by 5/1/04; $150 at the door. Seniors(65+)/Students (one banquet included): $80 by 12/31/03; $100 by 5/1/04; $125 at the door.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXIX Number 1 January/February 2009 Beyond The Moon From The Editor he Internet has transformed the way science is On the Cover: Tdone—even in the realm of “rocket science”— The United States has the opportunity to unify and inspire the and now anyone can make a real contribution, as world’s spacefaring nations to create a future brightened by long as you have the will to give your best. new goals, such as the human exploration of Mars and near- In this issue, you’ll read about a group of amateurs Earth asteroids. Inset: American astronaut Peggy A. Whitson who are helping professional researchers explore and Russian cosmonaut Yuri I. Malenchenko try out training Mars online, encouraged by Mars Exploration versions of Russian Orlan spacesuits. Background: The High Rovers Project Scientist Steve Squyres and Plane- Resolution Camera on Mars Express took this snapshot of tary Society President Jim Bell (who is also head Candor Chasma, a valley in the northern part of Valles of the rovers’ Pancam team.) Marineris, on July 6, 2006. Images: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training This new Internet-enabled fun is not the first, Center. Background: ESA nor will it be the only, way people can participate in planetary exploration. The Planetary Society has been encouraging our members to contribute Background: their minds and energy to science since 1984, A dust storm blurs the sky above a volcanic caldera in this image when the Pallas Project helped to determine the taken by the Mars Color Imager on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shape of a main-belt asteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Space Law
    THE EMERGENCE OF SPACE LAW Steve Doyle* I. INTRODUCTION Space law exists today as a widely regarded, separate field of jurisprudence; however, it has many overlapping features involving other fields, including international law, contract law, tort law, and administrative law, among others.1 Development of space law concepts began early in the twentieth century and blossomed during the second half of the century into its present state. It is not yet widely taught in law schools, but space law is gradually being accorded more space in law school curricula. Substantial notional law and concepts of space law emerged prior to the first orbiting of a man made satellite named Sputnik in 1957. During the next decade (1958-1967), an intense effort was made to bring law into compliance with the realities of expanding spaceflight activities. During the 1960s, numerous national and international regulatory laws emerged to deal with satellite launches and space radio uses and to ensure greater international awareness and governmental presence in the oversight of ongoing activities in space. Just as gradually developed bodies of maritime law emerged to regulate the operation of global shipping, aeronautical law emerged to regulate the expansion of global civil aviation, and telecommunication law emerged to regulate the global uses of radio and wire communication systems, a new body of law is emerging to regulate the activities of nations in astronautics. We know that new body of law as Space Law. * Stephen E. Doyle is Honorary Director, International Institute of Space Law, Paris. Mr. Doyle worked fifteen years in federal civil service (1966-1981), fifteen years in the aerospace industry (1981-1996), and fifteen years in the power production industry (1996-2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration
    ICEUM4, 10-15 July 2000, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Baikonur-International Space Station : International Approach to Lunar Exploration Gulnara Omarova, National Aerospace Agency; Chinghis Omarov, ISU Summer Session '98 alumni On 20th November 1998 our aircraft made soft landing at the Baikonur airport. I was among onboard passengers - officials from Kazakhstan Space, press and diplomats. We all were invited to attend the launch of the International Space Station (ISS) first component (the Russian-made Zarya or Functional Cargo Module FGB) by Proton launch-vehicle at the Baikonur spaceport. Two hours before ISS first module launch we joined the official delegations from NASA, Russian Space Agency (RSA), ESA, Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and NASDA to see the modified facilities of both "Energiya" Corp. and Khrunichev's Proton assembly-and- test building. Mr. Yuri Koptev, Chief of RSA and Mr. Dan Goldin, NASA Administrator actively were drinking russian tea and talking about crucial issues of the International Space Station and the future of Space Exploration. In fact, Cold War is over and the world's top space powers accomplishments are stunning: • The first human flight in space in 1961; • Human space flight initiatives to ascertain if and how long a human could survive in space; • Project Gemini (flights during 1965-1966) to practice space operations, especially rendezvous and docking of spacecraft and extravehicular activity; • Project Apollo (flights during 1968-1972) to explore the Moon; • Space Shuttle's flights (1981 - present); • Satellite programs; • A permanently occupied space station "Mir" (during 1976-1999); • A permanently occupied International Space Station presently underway. We and a few people approached them to learn much more particulars of their talking and to ask them most interesting questions.
    [Show full text]
  • AIAA Fellows
    AIAA Fellows The first 23 Fellows of the Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences (I) were elected on 31 January 1934. They were: Joseph S. Ames, Karl Arnstein, Lyman J. Briggs, Charles H. Chatfield, Walter S. Diehl, Donald W. Douglas, Hugh L. Dryden, C.L. Egtvedt, Alexander Klemin, Isaac Laddon, George Lewis, Glenn L. Martin, Lessiter C. Milburn, Max Munk, John K. Northrop, Arthur Nutt, Sylvanus Albert Reed, Holden C. Richardson, Igor I. Sikorsky, Charles F. Taylor, Theodore von Kármán, Fred Weick, Albert Zahm. Dr. von Kármán also had the distinction of being the first Fellow of the American Rocket Society (A) when it instituted the grade of Fellow member in 1949. The following year the ARS elected as Fellows: C.M. Bolster, Louis Dunn, G. Edward Pendray, Maurice J. Zucrow, and Fritz Zwicky. Fellows are persons of distinction in aeronautics or astronautics who have made notable and valuable contributions to the arts, sciences, or technology thereof. A special Fellow Grade Committee reviews Associate Fellow nominees from the membership and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors, which makes the final selections. One Fellow for every 1000 voting members is elected each year. There have been 1980 distinguished persons elected since the inception of this Honor. AIAA Fellows include: A Arnold D. Aldrich 1990 A.L. Antonio 1959 (A) James A. Abrahamson 1997 E.C. “Pete” Aldridge, Jr. 1991 Winfield H. Arata, Jr. 1991 H. Norman Abramson 1970 Buzz Aldrin 1968 Johann Arbocz 2002 Frederick Abbink 2007 Kyle T. Alfriend 1988 Mark Ardema 2006 Ira H. Abbott 1947 (I) Douglas Allen 2010 Brian Argrow 2016 Malcolm J.
    [Show full text]
  • The SKYLON Spaceplane
    The SKYLON Spaceplane Borg K.⇤ and Matula E.⇤ University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA This report outlines the major technical aspects of the SKYLON spaceplane as a final project for the ASEN 5053 class. The SKYLON spaceplane is designed as a single stage to orbit vehicle capable of lifting 15 mT to LEO from a 5.5 km runway and returning to land at the same location. It is powered by a unique engine design that combines an air- breathing and rocket mode into a single engine. This is achieved through the use of a novel lightweight heat exchanger that has been demonstrated on a reduced scale. The program has received funding from the UK government and ESA to build a full scale prototype of the engine as it’s next step. The project is technically feasible but will need to overcome some manufacturing issues and high start-up costs. This report is not intended for publication or commercial use. Nomenclature SSTO Single Stage To Orbit REL Reaction Engines Ltd UK United Kingdom LEO Low Earth Orbit SABRE Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine SOMA SKYLON Orbital Maneuvering Assembly HOTOL Horizontal Take-O↵and Landing NASP National Aerospace Program GT OW Gross Take-O↵Weight MECO Main Engine Cut-O↵ LACE Liquid Air Cooled Engine RCS Reaction Control System MLI Multi-Layer Insulation mT Tonne I. Introduction The SKYLON spaceplane is a single stage to orbit concept vehicle being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd in the United Kingdom. It is designed to take o↵and land on a runway delivering 15 mT of payload into LEO, in the current D-1 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Apollo on The
    NASA HISTORY DIVISION Office of External Relations volume 27, number 1 Fourth Quarter 2009/First Quarter 2010 FROM HOMESPUN HISTORY: THE CHIEF DOCUMENTING APOLLO HISTORIAN ON THE WEB By David Woods, editor, The Apollo Flight Journal Bearsden, Scotland In 1994 I got access to the Internet via a 0.014 Mbps modem through my One aspect of my job that continues to amaze phone line. As happens with all who access the Web, I immediately gravi- and engage me is the sheer variety of the work tated towards the sites that interested me, and in my case, it was astronomy we do at NASA and in the NASA History and spaceflight. As soon as I stumbled upon Eric Jones’s burgeoning Division. As a former colleague used to say, Apollo Lunar Surface Journal (ALSJ), then hosted by the Los Alamos NASA is engaged not just in human space- National Laboratory, I almost shook with excitement. flight and aeronautics; its employees engage in virtually every engineering and natural Eric was trying to understand what had been learned about working on science discipline in some way and often at the Moon by closely studying the time that 12 Apollo astronauts had spent the cutting edge. This breadth of activities is, there. To achieve this, he took dusty, old transcripts of the air-to-ground of course, reflected in the history we record communication, corrected them, added commentary and, best of all, man- and preserve. Thus it shouldn’t be surprising aged to get most of the men who had explored the surface to sit with him that our books and monographs cover such a and add their recollections.
    [Show full text]
  • JHU/APL Colloquia
    JHU Applied Physics Laboratory Colloquia November 15, 2019 www.jhuapl.edu/colloquium/archive [email protected] 2019 – 2020 Stephen Moore (Author and Journalist) UNCOMMON VALOR: Recon Company Medal of Honor Heroes of FOB-2. November 8, 2019. Lawrence Goldstone (Author) Going Deep: John Philip Holland and the Invention of the Attack Submarine. November 1, 2019. David Blodgett (JHU/APL) Optical Imaging of the Brain: Is There Really Anything to See? October 25, 2019. Larrie D. Ferreiro (George Mason Univ.) Brothers at Arms: American Independence and the Men of France and Spain Who Saved It. October 18, 2019. Dr. Etta Pisano, M.D., FACR (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) The Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) – A Bridge to Personalized Breast Cancer Screening. October 16, 2019. Héctor L. Díaz (Hispanics In History Cultural Organization) The Hispanic Assistance to the American Revolution. October 11, 2019. Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo (Southwest Research Institute) How the Hemispheric Polar Field Reversal Sets the Timing and Shape of the Solar Cycle. October 9, 2019. Dave "Bio" Baranek (Author, "TOPGUN Days") Topgun and Tomcats: High Explosives, Type-A Personalities, and Prandtl–Meyer Expansion Fans. October 4, 2019. 2018 – 2019 Mojie Crigler (END Fund) Under the Big Tree: Extraordinary Stories From the Movement to End Neglected Tropical Diseases. September 27, 2019. CAPT Mercedes Benitez-McCrary, Dr.HSc, MA CCC-SLP (Chief Professional Officer - Chief Therapist Officer, United States Public Health Service) “Puentes Y Verjas” – Hispanic Health. September 20, 2019. Eric Haseltine (Analyst and Consultant) The Spy in Moscow Station: A Counterspy's Hunt for a Deadly Cold War Threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of S.P
    ANNUAL REPORT OF S.P. KOROLEV ROCKET AND SPACE PUBLIC CORPORATION ENERGIA FOR 2019 This Annual Report of S.P.Korolev Rocket and Space Public Corporation Energia (RSC Energia) was prepared based upon its performance in 2019 with due regard for the requirements stated in the Russian Federation Government Decree of December 31, 2010 No. 1214 “On Improvement of the Procedure to Control Open Joint-Stock Companies whose Stock is in Federal Ownership and Federal State Unitary Enterprises”, and in accordance with the Regulations “On Information Disclosure by the Issuers of Outstanding Securities” No. 454-P approved by the Bank of Russia on December 30, 2014 Accuracy of the data contained in this Annual Report, including the Report on the interested-party transactions effected by RSC Energia in 2019, was confirmed by RSC Energia’s Auditing Committee Report as of 01.06.2020. This Annual Report was preliminary approved by RSC Energia’s Board of Directors on August 24, 2020 (Minutes No. 31). This Annual Report was approved at RSC Energia’s General Shareholders’ Meeting on September 28, 2020 (Minutes No 40 of 01.10.2020). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT RSC ENERGIA ............................. 6 1.1. Company background .........................................................................................................................6 1.2. Period of the Company operation in the industry ...............................................................................6 1.3. Information about the purchase and sale contracts for participating interests, equities, shares of business partnerships and companies concluded by the Company in 2019 ..............................................7 1.4. Information about the holding structure and the organizations involved ...........................................8 2. PRIORITY DIRECTIONS OF RSC ENERGIA OPERATION ........................ 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Ghosts at Roswell
    PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS ROBERT SHEAFFER Alien Ghosts at Roswell an a pseudoscientific documen- html). * * * tary be so insulting to the viewer’s To exploit his remarkable “scoop,” Most people are totally unaware of what C intelligence that even the cable Marrs produced a forty-five-minute would surely be the most shocking event chan nel planning to run it turns it down? documentary titled “The Alien Ghosts in U.S. military history if it had actually Ap parently at least one was: “The Alien at Roswell.” However, after the folks occurred: the Flying Saucer Air Wars of Ghosts at Roswell,” produced by Jim Marrs, at the Discovery Channel saw the 1952. At last, this long-neglected history is a well-known author and conspiracy theo- video, they didn’t want it. Fortunately, finally revealed to the world in Shoot them rist. Marrs first made his reputation on JFK UFOlo gist James Moseley was able to Down: The Flying Saucer Air Wars of 1952 assassination conspiracy claims, then moved get a copy, which he reviewed in his by Frank C. Feschino, Jr. on to “the extraterrestrial presence,” psychic publication Saucer Smear (October 20, The book, which boasts of a foreword spies, secret societies, and Septem ber 11 2007). According to Moseley, the video (and an epilogue) by the “flying saucer conspiracies. The documentary was made was filmed at the old Roswell air base physicist” Stanton T. Friedman, explains for the Discovery Channel, which has not and “stars a group of psychic researchers how the Air Wars were somehow con- shied away from many other programs led by UFOlogist Nick Redfern.” One nected to the famous Flatwoods Monster making absurd claims about hauntings, life scene shows an animated alien walking of September 12, 1952, in which a twelve- after death, numerology, etc.
    [Show full text]