DOCSLIB.ORG

TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS Final Report Central Oklahoma Transportation and Parking Authority (COTPA) TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS Final Report July 2013 TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS | FINAL REPORT COTPA Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 2 System Summary .............................................................................................................2-1 Existing Transit Services ........................................................................................................................ 2-1 Demographic and Land Use Characteristics ................................................................................... 2-14 Peer Review .......................................................................................................................................... 2-21 3 Community Input .............................................................................................................3-1 Stakeholder Interviews ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 Community Surveys ................................................................................................................................ 3-4 4 Existing Route Profiles .....................................................................................................4-1 5 Service Criteria .................................................................................................................5-1 6 Short Term Recommendations .........................................................................................6-1 Community Response ........................................................................................................................... 6-50 7 Long Term - Additional Resources Scenario ....................................................................7-1 8 Long Term - Unconstrained Resources Scenario ..............................................................8-1 Appendix A Route Scorecards Appendix B Ridership Maps Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS | FINAL REPORT COTPA Table of Figures Page Figure 2-1 Description and Service Type of Metro Transit Routes ................................................. 2-2 Figure 2-2 Metro Transit System Map .................................................................................................. 2-3 Figure 2-3 Span and Frequency of Weekday Routes by Time Period ......................................... 2-4 Figure 2-4 Span and Frequency of Weekday Routes ...................................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-5 Weekday Operating Statistics by Route......................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2-6 Weekday Boardings per Revenue Hour by Route ........................................................ 2-7 Figure 2-7 Weekday On Time Performance by Route ..................................................................... 2-7 Figure 2-8 Weekday On Time Percentage by Route ....................................................................... 2-8 Figure 2-9 Transfer Matrix of Weekday Trips at Downtown Transit Center ............................... 2-9 Figure 2-10 Saturday Span and Frequency ........................................................................................ 2-10 Figure 2-11 Saturday Operating Statistics by Route ........................................................................ 2-11 Figure 2-12 Saturday Boardings per Revenue Hour by Route ........................................................ 2-11 Figure 2-13 Operating Trends ............................................................................................................... 2-12 Figure 2-14 Annual Ridership: 2007 – 2011 ...................................................................................... 2-13 Figure 2-15 Passengers per Revenue Hour Systemwide: 2007 – 2011 ....................................... 2-13 Figure 2-16 Population Density, 2010 .................................................................................................. 2-15 Figure 2-17 Senior Density, 2010 ......................................................................................................... 2-16 Figure 2-18 Youth Density, 2010 ........................................................................................................... 2-17 Figure 2-19 Density of Household at or Below the Federal Poverty Line, 2006 - 2010 ........... 2-18 Figure 2-20 Density of Rental Households, 2006 - 2010 ................................................................. 2-19 Figure 2-21 Density of Zero Vehicle Households, 2006 - 2010 ..................................................... 2-20 Figure 2-22 Comparison of Key Operating Statistics – Central Oklahoma Transportation and Parking Authority (COTPA) and Peer Systems ..................................................... 2-21 Figure 2-23 Comparison of System Effectiveness – COTPA and Peer Systems ........................... 2-22 Figure 3-1 Comments from Intercept Survey at Transit Center ....................................................... 3-6 Figure 6-1 Proposed Route 1 Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 6-1 Figure 6-2 Proposed Changes to Route 1 ........................................................................................... 6-2 Figure 6-3 Proposed Route 2 Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 6-3 Figure 6-4 Proposed Changes to Route 2 ........................................................................................... 6-4 Figure 6-5 Proposed Route 3 Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 6-5 Figure 6-6 Proposed Changes to Route 3 ........................................................................................... 6-6 Figure 6-7 Proposed Route 4 Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 6-7 Figure 6-8 Proposed Changes to Route 4 ........................................................................................... 6-8 Figure 6-9 Proposed Route 5 Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 6-9 Figure 6-10 Proposed Changes to Route 5 ......................................................................................... 6-10 Figure 6-11 Proposed Route 7 Service Frequencies .......................................................................... 6-11 Figure 6-12 Proposed Changes to Route 7 ......................................................................................... 6-12 Figure 6-13 Proposed Route 8 Service Frequencies .......................................................................... 6-13 Figure 6-14 Proposed Changes to Route 8 ......................................................................................... 6-14 Figure 6-15 Proposed Route 9 Service Frequencies .......................................................................... 6-15 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | ii TRANSIT SERVICE ANALYSIS | FINAL REPORT COTPA Figure 6-16 Proposed Changes to Route 9 ......................................................................................... 6-16 Figure 6-17 Proposed Route 10 Service Frequency .......................................................................... 6-17 Figure 6-18 Proposed Changes to Route 10 ....................................................................................... 6-18 Figure 6-19 Proposed Route 11 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-19 Figure 6-20 Proposed Changes to Route 11 ....................................................................................... 6-20 Figure 6-21 Proposed Route 12 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-21 Figure 6-22 Proposed Changes to Route 12 ....................................................................................... 6-22 Figure 6-23 Proposed Route 13 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-23 Figure 6-24 Proposed Changes to Route 13 ....................................................................................... 6-24 Figure 6-25 Proposed Route 14 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-25 Figure 6-26 Proposed Changes to Route 14 ....................................................................................... 6-26 Figure 6-27 Proposed Changes to Route 15 ....................................................................................... 6-28 Figure 6-28 Proposed Route 16 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-29 Figure 6-29 Proposed Changes to Route 16 ....................................................................................... 6-30 Figure 6-30 Proposed Route 18 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-31 Figure 6-31 Proposed Changes to Route 18 ....................................................................................... 6-32 Figure 6-32 Proposed Route 19 Service Frequencies ........................................................................ 6-33 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oklahoma City 2011 Year–End Retail Market Summary TABLE of CONTENTS
    Oklahoma City 2011 Year–End Retail Market Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS Retail Market Summary 1-2 Sales Summary 3 North Submarket 4-5 Northwest Submarket 6-7 South Submarket 8-9 Edmond Submarket 10-11 West-Central Submarket 12-13 Moore / Norman Submarket 14-15 Eastern OK County Submarket 16-17 National Retail Review and Outlook Back Cover The information contained herein has been obtained from reasonably reliable sources. Price Edwards & Company makes no guarantee, either express or implied, as to the accuracy of such information. All data contained herein is subject to errors, omissions and changes. Reproduction in whole or in part, without prior written consent is prohibited. Oklahoma City 2011 Year–End Retail Market Summary THE Retail MARKet The Oklahoma City retail market has seen a Questions/Issues of Interest OKC TOTAL RETAIL MARKET INVENTORY continuation of a marked improvement this past year. This is borne out both in our firm’s As part of our year-end study, we wanted to 50 GLA SF Freestanding SF transactional activity and the year-end 2011 address a number of questions or issues about 40 survey results. Price Edwards manages and which we are frequently asked: leases nearly 7 million square feet of retail space 30 across Oklahoma; we generated a 20 percent Is all the news good news? In a word, no. increase in lease transactions this past year. There are a number of positives, as you would 20 The market vacancy at year–end dropped below expect during a general economic recovery. (millions of square feet) (millions of square 10 10 percent for the first time in years, ending the However, national retailers are still being year at 9.8 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • __History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
    HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Dallas Cowboys Training Camp Promo
    Training Camp Store Allocations Store Number Name Address 2685 The Parks Mall 3851 S Cooper St 2795 Stonebriar Mall 2607 Preston Rd 2434 Coronado Center 6600 Menaul Blvd NE Ste 3000 2939 North Star Mall 7400 San Pedro Ave 226 La Plaza 2200 S 10th St 2904 Southpark Meadows S/C 9500 S IH-35 Ste H 631 Ingram Park Mall 6301 NW Loop 410 702 Cielo Vista Mall 8401 Gateway Blvd W 1330 La Palmera Mall 5488 S Padre Island Dr Ste 4000 179 Timber Creek Crossing 6051 Skillman St 2946 Plaza at Rockwall 1015 E I 30 2877 The Rim Shopping Center 17710 La Cantera Pkwy 2338 Town East Mall 6000 Town East Mall 2055 Collin Creek Mall 821 N Central Expwy 1046 Golden Triangle Mall 2201 S Interstate 35 E Ste D 2410 Vista Ridge Mall 2401 S Stemmons Fwy Ste 4000 2884 Tech Ridge Center 12351 N IH-35 2826 Cedar Hill Village 333 N Hwy 67 2960 El Mercado Plaza 1950 Joe Battle Blvd 2969 Sherman Town Center 610 Graham Dr 2934 University Oaks Shopping Center 151 University Oaks 993 South Park Mall 2418 SW Military Dr 2982 Village at Fairview 301 Stacy Rd 2921 Robertsons Creek 5751 Long Prairie Rd 2105 Crossroads Mall 6834 Wesley St Ste C 1943 North East Mall 1101 Melbourne Dr Ste 5000 1419 Ridgmar Mall 1900 Green Oaks Rd 2093 Mesilla Valley Mall 700 Telshor Blvd Ste 2000 2021 Richland Mall 6001 W Waco Dr 579 Music City Mall 4101 E 42nd St 485 Mall of Abilene 4310 Buffalo Gap Rd 2682 Penn Square Mall 1901 NW Expwy Ste 1200 2833 Rolling Oaks Mall 6909 N Loop 1604 E 2806 Sunrise Mall 2370 N Expwy Ste 2000 712 Sikes Senter Mall 3111 Midwestern Pkwy 996 Broadway Square Mall 4401 S Broadway 450 Rio West Mall 1300 W Maloney Ave Ste A 1749 Central Mall 2400 Richmond Rd Ste 61 2905 Alliance Town Center 3001 Texas Sage Trl 658 Mall De Norte S/C 5300 San Dario 1989 Sunset Mall 6000 Sunset Mall 259 Colonial/Temple Mall 3111 S 31st St Ste 3301 1101 Valley Crossing Shopping Center 715 E Expressway 83 2036 Midland Park Mall 4511 N Midkiff Rd 304 Longview Mall 3550 McCann Rd 2110 Killeen Mall 2100 S W.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements
    Metro Transit Central-South (Sector 5) Final Plan 4.5 Public Outreach Conclusions Stakeholder and public comments provided guidance to improve various elements of the plan. About one fifth of the comments favored the plan. Four cities, one county and the University of Minnesota also supported the plan. Several neighborhood groups expressed concerns about specific elements of the plan. The majority of comments (over 60 percent) were in response to the proposed route elimination or service reductions on Routes 7, 8, 18, 19, 22, 52B, 84, 538 and 539. Another frequent comment was concern regarding increased transfers and loss of direct service to key destinations. For example, the proposed elimination of some direct service to the University of Minnesota was the source of many complaints. The Concept Plan was modified to address many of the stakeholder and customer concerns within the current operating budget and the tenants identified in the previous chapters. Of the 55 routes in the sector, 32 or 58 percent of routes were modified in response to public comment. The final plan preserves geographic coverage in all of the urban area, and most of the suburban areas, and direct service to the University of Minnesota from France Avenue/ W. 50th Street, Cedar Avenue/Portland Avenue and Snelling Avenue. This final plan, as modified to address the concerns raised during the public outreach phase, is supported by all five cities and the two counties found in the study area. 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements 5.1 Planned Transit Service Network The service improvement program begins with a high-to-medium frequency grid network of local service in high-density population and employment areas such as south Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Property Portfolio Simon Malls®
    The Shops at Clearfork Denver Premium Outlets® The Colonnade Outlets at Sawgrass Mills® 2019 PROPERTY PORTFOLIO SIMON MALLS® LOCATION GLA IN SQ. FT. MAJOR RETAILERS CONTACTS PROPERTY NAME 2 THE SIMON EXPERIENCE WHERE BRANDS & COMMUNITIES COME TOGETHER SIMON MALLS® LOCATION GLA IN SQ. FT. MAJOR RETAILERS CONTACTS PROPERTY NAME 2 ABOUT SIMON Simon® is a global leader in retail real estate ownership, management, and development and an S&P 100 company (Simon Property Group, NYSE:SPG). Our industry-leading retail properties and investments across North America, Europe, and Asia provide shopping experiences for millions of consumers every day and generate billions in annual sales. For more information, visit simon.com. · Information as of 12/16/2019 3 SIMON MALLS® LOCATION GLA IN SQ. FT. MAJOR RETAILERS CONTACTS PROPERTY NAME More than real estate, we are a company of experiences. For our guests, we provide distinctive shopping, dining, and entertainment. For our retailers, we offer the unique opportunity to thrive in the best retail real estate in the best markets. From new projects and redevelopments to acquisitions and mergers, we are continuously evaluating our portfolio to enhance the Simon experience—places where people choose to shop and retailers want to be. 4 LOCATION GLA IN SQ. FT. MAJOR RETAILERS CONTACTS PROPERTY NAME WE DELIVER: SCALE A global leader in the ownership of premier shopping, dining, entertainment, and mixed-use destinations, including Simon Malls®, Simon Premium Outlets®, and The Mills® QUALITY Iconic, irreplaceable properties in great locations INVESTMENT Active portfolio management increases productivity and returns GROWTH Core business and strategic acquisitions drive performance EXPERIENCE Decades of expertise in development, ownership, and management That’s the advantage of leasing with Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Statement
    Purpose and Need Statement South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project November 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: g PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK d PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Table of Contents Introduction 2 PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Introduction The South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project was initiated by the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) in partnership with Pace Suburban Bus to improve transit along approximately 11 miles of South Halsted Street, from the Pace Harvey Transportation Center to 79th Street. The corridor also includes segments of 79th and 95th Streets that provide connections to the CTA Red Line 79th and 95th Street Stations. For study purposes, the project area includes a half mile catchment area around the corridor as shown in Figure 1.1. The Purpose and Need Statement provides a foundation and justification for the project and is required for all projects going through the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.1 The South Halsted Bus Corridor serves the communities of Harvey, Phoenix, Dixmoor, Riverdale, Calumet Park, and the City of Chicago neighborhoods of West Pullman, Morgan Park, Roseland, Washington Heights, and Auburn Gresham. The project corridor aligns or intersects with multiple east-west and north-south arterial roadways, CTA and Pace bus routes, CTA and Metra rail stations, and shared-use paths. Transit improvements would complement CTA’s planned extension of the Red Line from 95th Street to 130th Street, as the preferred alignment is located a half mile or more from the Halsted Corridor. The Red Line Extension is currently undergoing the federal environmental review and planning process. The corridor is populated with mainly commercial businesses, surrounded by residential communities.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Department of Transportation
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FY 2018-2027 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DVRPC - FY 2018 Authorized and Unauthorized Projects (State Funds - $ millions) PROGRAM TRANSFER TRANSACTION TRANSACTION PROJECT NAME FUND PHASE AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL DATE BALANCE Center Square Rd (CR 620), Rt 295 Overpass (DB #D1719) STATE CD $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500 Duck Island Landfill, Site Remediation (DB #99334) STATE EC $0.100 $0.100 ($0.200) 11/27/2017 $0.000 DVRPC, Future Projects (DB #D026) STATE ERC $15.000 $0.000 $0.000 $15.000 Local County Aid, DVRPC (DB #X41C1) STATE ERC $30.040 $0.000 ($30.040) 10/17/2017 $0.000 Local Municipal Aid, DVRPC (DB #X98C1) STATE ERC $26.690 $0.000 ($26.690) 10/17/2017 $0.000 Route 1, Penns Neck Improvements (CR 571) (DB #17422) STATE PE $0.300 $0.173 $0.000 $0.473 Route 29, Cass Street to Calhoun Street, Drainage (DB # STATE ROW $0.250 $0.000 ($0.125) 10/24/2017 $0.125 07319B) Route 30, Gibbsboro Road (CR 686) (DB #16319) STATE DES $0.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.800 Route 38 and Lenola Road (CR 608) (DB #15353) STATE PE $0.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.600 Route 38, South Church Street (CR 607) to Fellowship Road STATE DES $2.500 $0.881 ($3.381) 6/20/2018 $0.000 (CR 673), Operational and Safety Improvements (DB #12307) Route 41 and Deptford Center Road (DB #15302) STATE PE $0.650 $0.000 $0.000 $0.650 Route 42, Ardmore Ave to Camden County Line, Pavement (DB STATE ROW $3.100 $0.000 ($1.478) 11/3/2017 $1.622 #12306) Route 42, Bridges over Blackwood Railroad Trail (DB #12313) STATE ROW $1.000 $0.000 ($0.246) 10/24/2017 $0.754 Route 45, Bridge over Woodbury Creek (DB #14348) STATE PE $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400 Route 47, Bridge over Route 295 (DB #15310) STATE ROW $0.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 Route 47, Grove St.
    [Show full text]
  • Citylink Route Booklet (PDF)
    SCHEDULE BOOKLET EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 2018 � REVISION: JUNE 2019 1 3. Group Transit Orientation A travel trainer provides an overview of accessibility features in transit vehicles and how to plan trips, pay and travel safely in the community while using fixed-route buses. Groups and Individuals can sign up for travel training by calling 325-676- 6BUS Option 2. Fixed-Route Service Fixed-route bus service is CityLink’s core service. In this service, ADA compliant transit buses are operated over an established route structure on a fixed schedule. There are 14 routes (8 weekday and 6 Saturday routes) on the Welcome to CityLink! CityLink route system. Transfers occur at CityLink at 1189 S. 2nd Street. This service is offered from 6:15 a.m. CityLink is the public transit system for the City of Abilene. We to 6:15 p.m. Monday through Friday, and Saturday from provide safe, reliable, and affordable transportation for the 7:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m., except for designated holidays. citizens of Abilene. For more information call 325-676-6BUS Option 1. What We Do ADA Paratransit We provide eight weekday and six Saturday fixed-route routes, which CityLink provides origin to destination transit service are distributed geographically across the city (See System Maps). In for persons with disabilities who are certified under addition, we provide door-to-door paratransit service and Evening the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Each curb-to-curb service. vehicle is equipped with wheelchair securement for Service Days passenger safety. Paratransit drivers are trained to assist passengers boarding and exiting the vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • City Commission
    City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 14, 2015 9:00 AM REGULAR City Hall Commission Chambers City Commission Tomás Regalado, Mayor Wifredo (Willy) Gort, Chair Keon Hardemon, Vice Chair Marc David Sarnoff, Commissioner District Two Frank Carollo, Commissioner District Three Francis Suarez, Commissioner District Four Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager Victoria Méndez, City Attorney Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 CONTENTS PR - PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS AM - APPROVING MINUTES MV - MAYORAL VETOES CA - CONSENT AGENDA PH - PUBLIC HEARINGS SR - SECOND READING ORDINANCES FR - FIRST READING ORDINANCES RE - RESOLUTIONS BC - BOARDS AND COMMITTEES DI - DISCUSSION ITEMS PART B PZ - PLANNING AND ZONING ITEM (S) MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS M - MAYOR'S ITEMS D1 - DISTRICT 1 ITEMS D2 - DISTRICT 2 ITEMS D3 - DISTRICT 3 ITEMS D4 - DISTRICT 4 ITEMS D5 - DISTRICT 5 ITEMS City of Miami Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2015 City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Chair Gort, Commissioner Sarnoff, Commissioner Carollo, Commissioner Suarez and Vice Chair Hardemon On the 14th day of May 2015, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, met at its regular meeting place in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, in regular session. The Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Gort at 9:04 a.m., recessed at 12:16 p.m., reconvened at 3:44 p.m., and adjourned at 8:14 p.m. Note for the Record: Commissioner Sarnoff entered the Commission chamber at 9:05 a.m., Vice Chair Hardemon entered the Commission chamber at 9:07 a.m., Commissioner Suarez entered the Commission chamber at 9:13 a.m., and Commissioner Carollo entered the Commission chamber at 9:38 a.m.
    [Show full text]