DOCSLIB.ORG

Bourdieu's Secret Admirer in the Caucasus Derluguian.Qxd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bourdieu's Secret Admirer in the Caucasus Derluguian.Qxd Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page I Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page II Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page III Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus GEORGI M. DERLUGUIAN Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page IV First published by Verso 2004 © Georgi Derluguian 2004 All rights reserved The moral rights of the author have been asserted 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Ve r s o UK: 6 Meard Street, London W1F 0EG USA: 180 Varick Street, New York,NY 10014 –4606 www.versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Left Books ISBN 1–85984– 567–3 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Derluguian, Georgi Bourdieu’s secret admirer in the Caucasus 1. Shanib, Musa 2. Bourdieu, Pierre – Influence 3. Caucasus – History 4. Caucasus – Politics and government I.Title 947.5'2085 ISBN 1859845673 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Derluguian, Georgi M. Bourdieu’s secret admirer in the Caucasus / Georgi Derluguian. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1–85984–567–3 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Chechnëiìa (Russia) – History – Autonomy and independence movements. 2. Shanibov, ëIìU. M. (ëIìUriæi Mukhamedovich) 3. Revolutionaries – Russia (Federation) – Chechnëiìa – Biography. 4. Chechnëiìa (Russia) – Ethnic relations. 5. Chechnëiìa (Russia) – Relations – Russia (Federation) 6. Russia (Federation) – Relations – Russia (Federation) – Chechnëiìa. 7. National liberation movements – Russia (Federation) – Chechnëiìa. I. Title. DK511.C37D47 2004 947.5'2–dc22 2004006919 Typeset in Garamond Printed in the USA by R. R. Donnelley & Sons Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page V CONTENTS MAPS vii INTRODUCTION DOES GLOBALIZATION BREED 1 ETHNIC VIOLENCE? 1 THE FIELD 29 2 COMPLEX TRIANGULATIONS 65 3 THE DYNAMICS OF DE-STALINIZATION 84 4 FROM 1968 TO 1989 104 5 SOCIAL STRUCTURE 129 6 THE NATIONALIZATION OF PROVINCIAL 166 REVOLUTIONS 7 THE SCRAMBLE FOR SOVIET SPOILS 219 THEORETICAL REPRISE POSSIBILITY 287 Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page VI TABLES 325 FIGURES 331 NOTES 335 BIBLIOGRAPHY 377 INDEX 395 Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page VII Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page VIII Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page 1 INTRODUCTION Does Globalization Breed Ethnic Violence? “In the Caucasus all good stories acquire the tendency to branch out.” Fazil Iskander, Sandro of Chegem, New York: Vintage Books, 1983 The empirical story to be told in this book until now remained buried in my files and for a variety of reasons. The immediate issue was one of personal ethics, insofar as the story involves passionately contested events and contemporary personalities, some of whose names have become notorious in their parts of the world. Secondly, there were complex conceptual–theoretical problems posed by the underlying narra- tive: its empirical richness called for an extensive and varied theoretical apparatus that took some years to assemble. Thirdly, the problem was political, insofar as the material to be presented had to do with phenomena commonly described as ethnic conflict, Islamic militancy, and international terrorism. Let me begin then with the personal, and with what pertains to my title: Bourdieu’s secret admirer in the Caucasus. AN UNCOMMON MAN The basis for my story originated in a chance encounter with one Musa Shanib, a fearsome Circassian rebel from the North Caucasus, whose lieutenants once Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page 2 2 INTRODUCTION included the even more fearsome Chechen fighters Shamil Basayev and Ruslan Gelayev.1 In the course of our meeting, which I describe in greater detail in chapter one, I discovered that Shanib was a much more complex figure than one might have at first assumed. To my no little astonishment, at some point in our conversation (or, rather, his monologue) Shanib suddenly revealed himself to be an enthusiastic student of the sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. This proved to be just the first of many ironies that marked out Shanib’s life story as being of unique interest. Shanib’s biography, suffused as it is with paradoxes and bitter disillusionments, seemed to summarize the trajectory of a whole generation of Soviet citizens who were born under Stalin, came of age in the expansive and wildly optimistic atmosphere of Khrushchev’s Thaw, spent the long uneventful years of Brezhnev’s “stagnation” in a kind of internal exile, and finally reemerged during Gorbachev’s perestroika in an ebullient surge of public activism that led, tragically, to a disastrous climax. It turned out that in Shanib’s native town of Nalchik, the small provincial capital of the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria, the 1989–1992 protests against the Soviet regime were organized and headed by largely the same network of people who had organized the previous wave of revolutionary contention between 1968 and 1972. Musa Shanib himself – or rather, Yuri Muhammedovich Shanibov, as he was known in a Russified form for much of his life – turned out to be a local version of what the French call a soixante-huitard: one of the New Left rebels of 1968. Shanibov’s circle of rebels consisted of educated men and a few formidable women connected through the local university, mostly via the departments of history, philosophy, and philology. They were characteristic examples of the upwardly mobile cadres, special- ists, and national intellectuals produced during the tremendous expansion of Soviet higher education in the 1950s. The dazzling career prospects which opened up in the wake of Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization program soon brought this group to the threshold of the Soviet bureaucratic elite: the so-called nomenklatura. However, in the momentous year of 1968, they were still considered too junior to be fully inducted into this elite group; and, besides, many of them nurtured different aspi- rations in the fields of social research and artistic creativity. Yuri Shanibov himself forfeited a promising career as a law enforcement official (already in his twenties he had served as a district attorney, or prokuror), and instead became a junior lecturer working towards his dissertation on the role of law in socialist self-governance – a distinctly anti-Stalinist topic. In the meantime, nomenklatura positions were rapidly being filled as the old Stalinist stalwarts came to be replaced by a new cohort of bureaucrats. Towards the mid-1960s there emerged all over the Soviet provinces closed networks of Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page 3 INTRODUCTION 3 bureaucratic patronage and privilege that would hold their grip on power for years to come – in a refashioned form, these bureaucratic networks still proved able to provide the basis for the post-communist oligarchic restoration of the 1990s. In the small world of Nalchik, when I first visited there in 1997 and met Musa Shanib, this phenomenon was particularly transparent – the local rulers were still the same communist bureaucrats of the late 1950s and early 1960s, or else their personally selected successors. On the other side of the barricades, the local opposition was also still made up of mostly the same sixties intellectuals, or their former students. Back in 1968, the suppression of the democratic movement in Czechoslovakia had signaled to the Soviet nomenklatura the urgency of aborting any movement that might have developed similar demands for “socialism with a human face.” It was in this climate that the energetic young lecturer Yuri Shanibov was selected for a show of punishment, and subsequently became regarded locally as kind of a dissi- dent, or at least as a troublemaker possessing unusual ideas. After a hiatus of nearly two decades, Gorbachev’s program of reform from above offered people like Shanibov a second chance to engage in public debate and to organize reform movements from below. But in a few years, as Gorbachev’s half- hearted liberalization fell further and further behind the exploding expectations of Soviet citizenry, Shanibov’s circle of friends, colleagues, and former students radi- calized their political demands to include the wholesale removal of the old nomenklatura from power. They first sought to achieve this goal through the compet- itive elections of 1989 and 1990 – elections that soon turned into street protests as it became clear that the electoral process had been brazenly manipulated by local officials. Street politics, however, were a quite different matter from debating in intellectual clubs. It now proved necessary to mobilize people from other classes of society against the intractable nomenklatura. In the process, a totally new kind of protestor, with totally new demands, emerged from the poor and disorderly semi- rural suburbs. These were much cruder, less disciplined people, who soon showed themselves prone to direct action which was characteristically violent in nature. Their idea of democratization may have boiled down to punishing the “fat bureau- crats and official thieves,” but these masses were a real force – so, like many revolutionaries before them, Shanibov and his companions decided to ride the tiger of popular wrath. The protagonists during the stormy events of 1989 to 1992 were still the same network of local bureaucrats who had ruled in Nalchik for decades, versus the same oppositional network of alienated intellectuals and junior specialists whose careers had been blocked by the corrupt nomenklatura. But the character of Bourdieu’s Secret Admirer in the Caucasus_Derluguian.qxd 5/21/2004 12:49 Page 4 4 INTRODUCTION contention and its ideology had changed radically.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Batumi Guidebook.Pdf
    About Georgia 10 10 О Грузии General Information 10 11 Краткая информация о Грузии About Ajara 13 13 Аджария General Information 13 13 Краткая информация об Аджарии Population 14 15 Население Nature - Geography 14 14 Природа – география Climate 14 15 Климат Flora and Fauna 16 16 Флора и фауна Protected Areas 16 16 Охраняемые территории Kobuleti Protected Areas 16 18 Охраняемые территории Кобулети Kintrishi Protected Areas 16 18 Кинтришская охраняемая территория Mtirala National Park 19 19 Национальный парк Мтирала Machakhela Transboundary Protected Areas 21 21 Трансграничная охраняемая территория Мачахела Natural Treasures 21 21 Природные богатства Botanical Garden 21 21 Ботанический сад Green Lake (“Mtsvane Tba”) 22 22 Озеро Мцване Goderdzi Petried Forest 22 22 Ископаемый лес Годердзи Coastal Sand Dunes 22 22 Прибрежные песчаные дюны History 24 25 История History of Ajara (Review) 24 25 Исторический обзор Аджарии Ajara as an Autonomous Republic Аджария как автономная республика within Georgia 27 27 в составе Грузии Religion and Traditions 28 28 Религия и традиции Christian Orthodoxy in Ajara 28 28 Православие в Аджарии Other Religious Denominations in Ajara 28 28 Другие религии и конфессии в Грузии Religious Monuments 30 30 Религиозные памятники Cuisine 40 39 Кухня Ajarian Cuisine 40 40 Аджарская кухня Ajarian Wine 40 40 Аджарское вино Culture and Art 43 42 Искусство и культура Architecture 43 43 Архитектура Arched Bridges 44 44 Арочные мосты Archaeology 47 47 Археология Craft 48 49 Ремесла Folklore 51 51 Фольклор Theatres, Cinema, Circus
    [Show full text]
  • Ajara - Eng Opt.Pdf
    , 2018 2 • • • • • • • • • • • 3 Non-resident traveler of Georgia, aged 15 or older, who has visited Heritage Foundation Georgia from his usual environment for the duration less than a year. The average number of persons employed in the enterprise Employees in the enterprise whose labor relations are regulated by (employee, employed founders and family members in the case an agreement or contract with the enterprise, and who have been paid of family enterprise) during the reporting period Network Readiness Index Foreign Direct Investments A non-resident person of any age who travels at different geographical areas of any kind , for any duration and purpose. It excludes residents of Legal entities and individual entrepreneurs (including local Georgia who are citizens of other country and includes citizens of units and branches) registered under the Georgian legislation. Georgia, who are residents of foreign countries Freedom act Gross Domestic Product Business tourism Travel and tourist competitiveness index Assess the strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and Global peace index threats of the company National statistics office of Georgia Georgian National Tourism Administration Includes all visits which are not included in the number Georgian National Communications Commission of visits made by international visitors. This includes traveler visits for younger than 15 year olds. Institute for Development of Freedom of Information The symbol represents the source of statistical information 4 Within the framework of the project, it was
    [Show full text]
  • "Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict" by H
    University of California, Berkeley Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict Harsha Ram Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ Prisoners of the Caucasus: Literary Myths and Media Representations of the Chechen Conflict Harsha Ram Summer 1999 Harsha Ram is an assistant professor in the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures at UC Berkeley Edited by Anna Wertz BPS gratefully acknowledges support from the National Security Education Program for providing funding for the publication of this Working Paper .
    [Show full text]
  • Recasting Russia
    georgi derluguian RECASTING RUSSIA midst the clouds of apocalyptic farrago surrounding the attacks of September 11, the most significant immediate Achange in world politics has been largely obscured. The American bombardment of Afghanistan has relocated Russia within the international geopolitical order. Putin’s accession to power on the last day of 1999 was welcomed by Western capitals from the start. Blair sped to embrace him on Clinton’s behalf before he had even been installed by the manipulated popular vote of spring 2000, while relations between Moscow and its creditors in Berlin and Washington were held on an even keel throughout. But the operation that secured Putin’s domestic victory at the polls—the unleashing of a murderous second war in Chechnya—remained something of a foreign embarrass- ment. Although Clinton could freely hail the ‘liberation of Grozny’, for European sensibilities—at any rate on the continent—the mass killings and torture of Chechens was a troubling spectacle. Germany did its best to smooth over such misgivings, pentito Foreign Minister Fischer acting in the best traditions of the Wilhelmstrasse during the Armenian massacres. But public opinion—even occasionally the European Parliament—remained uneasy. Republican victory in the Presidential elections of 2000 promised fur- ther difficulties. Where Clinton and Gore had been intimately connected to Yeltsin and protective of his successor, Bush’s programme was critical of American complicity with the kleptocracy in Russia, and dismissive of the need to save Moscow’s face, pressing ahead regardless with the new version of Star Wars on which Washington had already embarked. Between European humanitarian hand-wringing and American real- politiker cold-shouldering, Russia under its former KGB operative was little more than an uncomfortable guest at the banquets of the G7.
    [Show full text]
  • I Am Falling Behind the Happenings
    The Diary of Anatoly S. Chernyaev 1985 Donated by A.S. Chernyaev to The National Security Archive Translated by Anna Melyakova Edited by Svetlana Savranskaya http://www.nsarchive.org Translation © The National Security Archive, 2006 The Diary of Anatoly S. Chernyaev, 1985 http://www.nsarchive.org January 4th, 1985. I am falling behind the events. And they are bustling. Before the New Year’s I was distressed for Ponomarev:1 Kosolapov asked for permission to print in Communist the conclusion we wrote for B.N. [Ponomarev] for the eight-volume International Labor Movement. In response, he received instructions from Zimyanin2 to remove the footnote that it was the conclusion—let it, he says, be just an article... This is how Zimyanin now gives orders to B.N., being lower in rank than him! But something else is the most important—he reflects the “opinion” that it is not necessary to establish the connection (for many decades into the future) between Ponomarev and this fundamental publication in an official Party organ... That is, they are preparing our B.N. for the hearse. I think he will not survive the XXYII Congress; in any case not as CC [Central Committee] Secretary. At work, almost every day brings evidence of his helplessness. His main concern right now is to vindicate at least something of his self-imagined “halo” of the creator of the third (1961) Party Program. In no way can he reconcile himself to the fact that life has torn “his creation” to pieces. He blames everything on the intrigues of either Gorbachev3 or Chernenko4; but mainly on “the curly one” (this is how he calls Chernenko’s assistant Pechenev); and also in part on Aleksandrov5 and Zagladin.6 He complains to me, seeking in me somebody to talk to, a sympathizer.
    [Show full text]
  • Gorbachev and the Dynamics of Change *
    GORBACHEV AND THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE * K.S. Karol By six in the morning, queues are already beginning to form in front of the news-stands in Moscow and Leningrad. People may be queuing to buy Ogonek, a popular illustrated weekly which had no great readership until very recently, or a literary review which is publishing a work that has been held up by the censors for decades, or a long-awaited critical novel. They may even be queuing to make sure of getting hold of their usual daily, or sometimes even Pravda, if it contains an article or an interview that is out of the ordinary: they are afraid that it will be sold out within a few hours. Live television programmes are also becoming more common and the public, who are often invited to take part in them, follow them with an attention that was unknown in the past. Although they have a world-wide reputation for being indigestible, the Soviet press and mass media are suddenly enjoying immense public popularity, thanks to the policy of glasnost (openness) introduced by Mikhail Gorbachev. Is this phenomenon really only the tip of an iceberg? Are profound changes really at work in Soviet society? How far can the perestroika (reconstruct- ion) inspired and led by the new General Secretary actually go? For the first time since the Revolution of October 1917-and on the eve of its seventieth anniversary-censorship has been virtually abolished in the Soviet Union. Editors of various publications, who are assumed to know just how far they can go, have sole responsibility for what they publish.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 1 the Curse of Displacement
    1 2 The curse of displacement: Local narratives of forced expulsion and 3 the appropriation of abandoned property in Abkhazia 4 5 Andrea Peinhopf, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London 6 7 8 Abstract. Since the end of the Georgian-Abkhaz war, the often-precarious status of the Georgians 9 displaced from Abkhazia has received significant academic attention. In contrast, the 10 consequences of displacement from the reverse perspective – how it has affected the people who 11 stayed behind – remains underanalysed. Drawing on narratives collected during several months 12 of ethnographic fieldwork, this paper argues that although ethnic Abkhazians see themselves as 13 victims of ethnic violence rather than perpetrators, the re-distribution of Georgian property 14 nevertheless caused significant distress. Many condemned the practice of appropriation, 15 suggesting that taking what is not one’s own is not only a violation of the property of the original 16 owner, but also of the Abkhaz moral code and therefore shameful. To them, the trophy houses 17 were a curse, both literally – as spaces haunted by former occupants – and metaphorically, as a 18 source and reminder of a certain “moral corruption” within Abkhazian society. However, while 19 the stories around the trophy houses reflect substantial intra-communal divisions, I suggest that 20 they are also an expression of a shared post-war experience. Like the horror stories of Georgian 21 violence, and those of Abkhaz heroism, they have become part of an intimate
    [Show full text]
  • 'Populism': Armenia's “Velvet Revolution”
    The Armenian Studies Program and the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies present the 42nd Educator Outreach Conference Authoritarianism, Democratization, and ‘Populism’: Armenia’s “Velvet Revolution” in Perspective Saturday, May 1, 2021 Livestream on YouTube University of California, Berkeley From end March to early May 2018, a series of peaceful protests and demonstration led to the resignation of Prime Minister (PM) Serzh Sargsyan, whom the then ruling Republican Party he chaired had newly nominated for that office. Having completed his two terms as President, from 2008 to 2018, Serzh Sargsyan’s attempt to remain in power became obvious. This attempt also made it evident that the amended 2015 Constitution, which he had promoted to invigorate democratization by shifting power from the office of the President to the Parliament and the office of the Prime Minister, was merely a ploy to extend his rule. It was also the proverbial “last straw that broke the camel’s back.” A kleptocratic, semi-authoritarian regime that appeared to control all the levers of power and of the economy suddenly, and unexpectedly, collapsed. This regime change—which the leader of the protests and incoming new prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, referred to as a “Velvet Revolution”—was peaceful, something unusual for a post-Soviet republic. Subsequent parliamentary elections brought to power a new generation, younger deputies mostly between the ages of twenty-five to forty. A similar generation change also characterized the formation of the government. Youth, however, also means inexperience as almost none of the new deputies and ministers had held any political position in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • “Why It Is Difficult to Be a Chechen”
    “Why It Is Difficult To Be A Chechen” Dr. Georgi M. Derluguian Assistant Professor of Sociology, Northwestern University Russia and Eurasia Program Center for Strategic and International Studies Caucasus Initiative Monday, December 9, 2002 Seminar Summary In his remarks, Georgi Derluguian set out to explain what macro- and micro-sociological mechanisms have led to the tragic situation in which the Chechen people find themselves today. One of the main factors suggested was the negative impact of romanticized and often ignorant stereotypes placed upon the region largely by outsiders. Since these stereotypes continue to inform the analyses of the Chechen war, they become a major obstacle to formulating political alternatives. As an example, Derluguian cited a definition of “Chechens” from a recently published American encyclopedia describing them as a small, fiercely Muslim, mountainous people from the Caucasus, most remarkable for their hatred of Russians. This definition, Derluguian argued, is a pile of false clichés. Derluguian argued that stereotypes such as this adversely impact a population because they inform the way people behave, including the Chechens themselves—how they view themselves, what they see as acceptable, and what they see as desirable. A peaceful resolution to the conflict of Chechnya would involve teaching history—a responsibility that is largely neglected and left to nationalists. Derluguian traced the origins of the Russian–Chechen conflict to the Russian conquest of the north Caucasus in the late eighteenth century. Unlike other peoples of the region, the Chechens historically had no aristocratic class willing to cooperate with the Russian empire in return for privilege. The Chechens, rather, were a largely self-sufficient population (independent small- holding farmers), well armed with locally manufactured and thus cheap but deadly effective rifles.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and Islamic Practices in Georgia
    University of California, Berkeley Islam and Islamic Practices in Georgia George Sanikidze and Edward W. Walker Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPS’s mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ Islam and Islamic Practices in Georgia George Sanikidze and Edward W. Walker Fall 2004 George Sanikidze is the director of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Georgian Academy of Sciences in Tbilisi. He was a visiting scholar at Berkeley during 2003–2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt7hc733q3.Pdf
    UC Berkeley GAIA Research Series Title The Myth of "Ethnic Conflict": Politics, Economics, and "Cultural" Violence Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7hc733q3 Journal Research Series, uciaspubs/research/98 Authors Crawford, Beverly Lipschutz, Ronnie D. Publication Date 1998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Edited by Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz Description: In the last decade, discourses of economic and political liberalization and globalization have swept the world. Yet during this same period and all across the globe, many states are fragmenting and more than 30 ethnic and sectarian conflicts have displaced or killed millions of people — and far more civilians than soldiers. The authors in this volume argue that much of this violence is closely linked to those globalizing forces and demands for economic liberalization which have weakened states' capacities, both political and financial, for redistributing resources. As a result, many states have been forced to break established social contracts, often dramatically changing power relations in heterogeneous societies that previously had been relatively stable. Drawing on case studies from Asia, Eastern Europe, North Africa, the former Soviet Union, and the United States, the authors demonstrate how these distributional issues and power shifts have been experienced as ethnic and religious discrimination and are often at the root of identity politics and violent, so-called “cultural,” conflicts. RESEARCH SERIES / NUMBER 98 The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Editors UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The myth of “ethnic conflict” : politics, economics, and “cultural” violence / Beverly Crawford and Ronnie D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Analysis of the Russo-Soviet Anekdot
    A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSO-SOVIET ANEKDOT by Seth Benedict Graham BA, University of Texas, 1990 MA, University of Texas, 1994 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2003 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Seth Benedict Graham It was defended on September 8, 2003 and approved by Helena Goscilo Mark Lipovetsky Colin MacCabe Vladimir Padunov Nancy Condee Dissertation Director ii Copyright by Seth Graham 2003 iii A CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSO-SOVIET ANEKDOT Seth Benedict Graham, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2003 This is a study of the cultural significance and generic specificity of the Russo-Soviet joke (in Russian, anekdot [pl. anekdoty]). My work departs from previous analyses by locating the genre’s quintessence not in its formal properties, thematic taxonomy, or structural evolution, but in the essential links and productive contradictions between the anekdot and other texts and genres of Russo-Soviet culture. The anekdot’s defining intertextuality is prominent across a broad range of cycles, including those based on popular film and television narratives, political anekdoty, and other cycles that draw on more abstract discursive material. Central to my analysis is the genre’s capacity for reflexivity in various senses, including generic self-reference (anekdoty about anekdoty), ethnic self-reference (anekdoty about Russians and Russian-ness), and critical reference to the nature and practice of verbal signification in more or less implicit ways. The analytical and theoretical emphasis of the dissertation is on the years 1961—86, incorporating the Stagnation period plus additional years that are significant in the genre’s history.
    [Show full text]